MSH SHS FallsFromHeights

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Government of Western Australia

Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety Safety and Health Snapshot
for the Western Australian minerals sector

Fall from heights Issued December 2019

Mining operations in Western Australia Injuries by severity Part of body (top 5)


frequently require workers to perform
duties at height, or where there is a
risk of falling from one level to another Shoulder 17%
or into openings. This may be on the
surface or underground, with each Back 17%
situation offering its own unique set of 34 of the 36 injuries Arm 11%
circumstances.
identified as fall from height injuries Knee 8%
The snapshot covers the period from were classified as serious
June 2018 to May 2019 (unless stated Ankle 19%
otherwise), when there were 36 injuries
and 34 notifiable incidents identified as 20 of the 36 injuries
fall from heights. were lost time injuries Injuries by days lost
For more information about
occupational safety and health, visit
our website www.dmirs.wa.gov.au Injuries by nature 104 work days lost
@DMIRS_WA
10 of the 36 injuries 159 work days on
Department of Mines,
were sprains alternative duties
Industry Regulation and Safety

8 were fractures
Injuries by activity
Injuries by area
Operations had the highest
33 of the 36 injuries Injuries by occupation
proportion of injuries at 56%
occurred during surface operations
Processing plant operators
had the highest proportion
Maintenance was the 2nd
of injuries at 14%
highest at 28%

Fitters had the 2nd highest


at 11%
3 of the 36 injuries
occurred during underground operations
Fall from height injuries over 5-year period from June 2014 to May 2019
40

35

30
Number of injuries

25
Injuries by employment type
20

15

10

16 20
5

0
Company Contractor Jun 14 - May 15 Jun 15 - May 16 Jun 16 - May 7 Jun 17 - May 18 Jun 18 - May 19
Fall 0.5-2 metres Fall 2-5 metres Fall >10 metres

Note: The information in this snapshot has come from a keyword search of incident reports.
Some recent incidents Spotlight on Mines Safety Spotlight on Mines Safety
Significant Incident Report Significant Incident Report
No. 271 No. 276
Dislodged panel 20/05/19
Near miss when latch fails and gate Fall from height after failure of
A worker fell approximately 3.5 metres swings open on a haul truck retractable type lanyard
to the level below of a tower when the 23 November 2018 28 May 2019
panel he was standing on dislodged.
The worker was replacing expanded
mesh panels. At the time of the fall, he
was relocating his position and had
detached his fall protection lanyard
from an overhead static line. The
worker was treated for a broken ankle.

Step broke 01/07/18

At the end of the shift the drilling


team arrived back at camp and
parked the support truck. As one of Contributory causes
the crew exited the cab, the vehicle •• The site's routine maintenance
step broke at one of the top mounting Contributory causes
program and prestart inspection
points causing the step to give regime for the plant didn't prompt •• Higher level risk mitigation
way. The worker fell to the ground workers to inspect the latch. measures (e.g. a stairway) were
(approximately 1.5 metres), landing on not in use.
their feet then fell onto their side using •• The original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) released •• The fall arrest equipment was not
their arm to break the fall. used in a way to reduce, so far as
a service bulletin in April 2017
relating to the latch; however, the is practicable, the possibility of
recommended works were not injury to the user.
actioned on this vehicle. •• The anchor point selection was
Fall into void 05/06/18 incorrect for the application and
•• The OEM's service bulletin didn't
identify the hazard relating to outside the maximum of 30°
A boilermaker was scoping work to a failure of the latch. Nor did it offset recommended in AS/NZS
be completed on the top deck of an communicate this as a mandatory 1891.4:2009, Part 5.1.2.
excavator. The boilermaker moved improvement or a priority for the •• The lanyard integrity was
around two fitters on the right hand recommended works. compromised at the connection
side of the excavator's main walkway between the inertia reel and the
to access the other side of the top shock absorber with the webbing
deck. The boilermaker did not see that material worn and/or damaged.
a hatch had been opened and stepped Safe work practices •• The scaffolder's lateral swing (the
into the void between the engines and pendulum effect) extended the fall
battery box, falling approximately 2.4 Provide safe means of
distance, likely exceeding free fall
metres. access and exit from any
limits, before the lanyard took up
workplace and area from
the load.
which a person could fall.

If it is not reasonably
Useful online resources practicable to eliminate the
Assess work area and
risk of a fall, minimise the
•• ‘Down to Earth’ hazard awareness take proper precautions.
risk of falls by using a fall
video series Conduct risk assessments
prevention device, work
(e.g. JSA) prior to work
•• Prevention of falls at workplaces – positioning system or fall
when necessary.
code of practice arrest system. Be mindful
•• Managing the risk of falls at that fall restraint systems Ensure workers undergo
workplaces – model code of are not suitable if: working at heights training.
practice (Safe Work Australia) •• a person can reach fall
•• FAQs on working at height position
Maintain equipment in
•• Department of Employment, Skills, •• the slope is > 15o good working order. Always
Small and Family Business •• a person can fall inspect anchorages and
through the surface (e.g. equipment before use.
roof).

For more information see our safety alerts and summaries for industry awareness at www.dmirs.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety
Past issues of monthly safety and health snapshot series can be viewed at www.dmp.wa.gov.au/SafetySnapshots

You might also like