Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate Financial Management (CFM) - Module-06 - Capital Investment Appraisal - (Part-2) - NPV
Corporate Financial Management (CFM) - Module-06 - Capital Investment Appraisal - (Part-2) - NPV
CFM
Corporate Financial Management (CFM)
06. Capital investment appraisal (con...)
Module -06 (31) Accounting Rate of Return
(32) Payback Period
(33) Discounted Payback Period
402.06
(34) Net Present Value
Capital
(35) Internal Rate of Return and their comparison
investment
(36) Implications of taxation and inflation
appraisal
(37) Capital rationing
(con...)
(38) Capital budgeting under uncertainty
(39) Lease or buy decisions
Learning outcomes:
(b) Net Present Value
(c) Advantages and limitations of NPV
(d) Formulas of NPV
(e) Use of NPV
(f) Calculation of NPV
Net Present Value (NPV)
Net Present Value (NPV)
The net present value takes into account the Net present value (NPV) is the difference
profitability by analyzing cash flows over the life of between the present value of cash
the project. It uses the cost of capital to discount inflows and the present value of cash
the cash flows. Net present value (NPV) is the outflows over a period of time. NPV is used
difference between the present value of cash in capital budgeting and investment
inflows and the present value of cash outflows over planning to analyze the profitability of a
a period of time. projected investment or project
The net present value (NPV) method is a process of calculating the present value of cash
flows (inflows and outflows) of an investment proposal, using the cost of capital as the
appropriate discounting rate, and finding out the net profit value, by subtracting the
present value of cash outflows from the present value of cash inflows.
The equation for the net present value, assuming that all cash outflows are made in the initial year,
will be:
Where A1, A2…. Represent cash inflows, K is the firm’s cost of capital, C is the cost of the
investment proposal and n is the expected life of the proposal. It should be noted that the cost of
capital, K, is assumed to be known, otherwise the net present, value cannot be known.
Page # 150
12th Edition (September-2021)
Corporate Financial Management
By Md. Monowar Hossain, FCA, CPA,
FCMA,CISA,CPFA(UK),FCGA,FCS
md.monowar@gmail.com
NPV is calculated by discounting the future net cash flows after tax using the firm’s risk-adjusted
cost of capital. Then all the present values of the future cash flows are added up. Then the initial
outlay is subtracted from the sum of the present values. The decision rule is to accept all projects
if the NPV is equal to zero or greater than zero, provided there is no capital rationing.
Where ‘k’ is the opportunity cost of capital and ‘N’ is the time period of the project (years).
21
KEY POINTS:
• Net present value, or NPV, is used to calculate today’s value of a future stream of
payments.
• If the NPV of a project or investment is positive, it means that the discounted present value
of all future cash flows related to that project or investment will be positive, and therefore
attractive.
• To calculate NPV you need to estimate future cash flows for each period and determine the
correct discount rate.
If analyzing a longer-term project with multiple cash flows, the formula for the net present
value of a project is:
If you are unfamiliar with summation notation, here is an easier way to remember the concept
of NPV:
NPV=Today’s value of the expected cash flows−Today’s value of invested cash
21
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/032615/what-formula-calculating-net-present-value-npv.asp
Page # 151
12th Edition (September-2021)
Corporate Financial Management
By Md. Monowar Hossain, FCA, CPA,
FCMA,CISA,CPFA(UK),FCGA,FCS
md.monowar@gmail.com
Examle:
Examle:
Advantages: Limitations:
1. It recognizes the time value of 1. It is difficult to use
money 2. It presupposes that the discount rate which is
2. It considers all cash flows over the usually the firm’s cost of capital is known. But in
entire life of the project in its practice, to understand cost of capital is quite a
calculations. difficult concept.
3. It is consistent with the objective 3. It may not give satisfactory answer when the
of maximizing the welfare of the projects being compared involve different amounts
owners. of investment
a Initial investment purchase price does not directly affect net income and therefore is not
The positive net present value (computed above) indicates that the investment is profitable,
therefore the machine should be purchased.
The working capital required for project B will be released at the end of project life. MONYEM
company uses an 18% discount rate.
Required: Are the two projects comparable using net present value (NPV)? If yes, select the best
investment using net present value (NPV) method.
Page # 153
12th Edition (September-2021)
Corporate Financial Management
By Md. Monowar Hossain, FCA, CPA,
FCMA,CISA,CPFA(UK),FCGA,FCS
md.monowar@gmail.com
Yes, the two projects are comparable because both the projects require equal amount of initial
investment.
NPV of project A:
Amount
Present value
of 18%
Years of
cash Factor
cash flows
flows
Cost of equipment Now $600,000 1.000 $(600,000)
Annual cash inflow 1 – 8 $160,000 4.078* $652,480
Salvage value of the
8 $40,000 0.266** $10,640
equipment
Net present value (NPV) $63,120
NPV of project B:
Amount of Present value
18%
Years cash of
Factor
flows cash flows
Working capital needed Now $600,000 1.000 $(600,000)
Annual cash inflow 1 – 8 $120,000 4.078* $489,360
Release of working capital 8 $600,000 0.266** $159,600
Net present value
$48,960
(NPV)
According to NPV method, project A looks more desirable because its net present value is more
than project B.
MUTTAKEEN company is trying to choose the best investment project from two alternative projects.
The company has $30,000 to invest. The information about two alternatives is given below:
Project Project
X Y
Investment required $30,000 $30,000
Annual cash inflows $8,000 0
Single cash inflow at the end of 8
– $120,000
years
Project life 8 years 8 years
Required: Give your recommendations to the company in selecting the best project to invest
$30,000.
Page # 154
12th Edition (September-2021)
Corporate Financial Management
By Md. Monowar Hossain, FCA, CPA,
FCMA,CISA,CPFA(UK),FCGA,FCS
md.monowar@gmail.com
Solution of problem no. 51(B): [Comparison of projects using net NPV method ]
(1) The present value of cash flows and the net present value of the proposed investment can be
calculated as follows:
Present Value Present Value
Year Cash Flow Interest Factor Cash Flow
0 ($25,000) 1.0000 ($25,000)
1 5,000 0.9091 4,545
2 5,000 0.8264 4,132
3 5,000 0.7513 3,757
4 5,000 0.6830 3,415
5 5,000 0.6209 3,105
6 5,000 0.5645 2,822
7 5,000 0.5132 2,566
8 5,000 0.4665 2,333
9 5,000 0.4241 2,120
10 5,000 0.3855 1,928
Page # 155
12th Edition (September-2021)
Corporate Financial Management
By Md. Monowar Hossain, FCA, CPA,
FCMA,CISA,CPFA(UK),FCGA,FCS
md.monowar@gmail.com
Cost of Capital 10.0%
Present Value of Benefits $30,723
Present Value of Cost $25,000
Net Present Value $5,723
(2 & 3) The cumulative cash flow of the proposed investment for each period in both nominal and
present-value terms is:
Cash Present Value Present Value Cumulative Cumulative
Year Flow Interest Factor Cash Flow Cash Flow PV Cash Flow
0 ($25,000) 1.0000 ($25,000) ($25,000) ($25,000)
1 5,000 0.9091 4,545 (20,000) (20,455)
2 5,000 0.8264 4,132 (15,000) (16,322)
3 5,000 0.7513 3,757 (10,000) (12,566)
4 5,000 0.6830 3,415 (5,000) (9,151)
5 5,000 0.6209 3,105 0 (6,046)
6 5,000 0.5645 2,822 5,000 (3,224)
7 5,000 0.5132 2,566 10,000 (658)
8 5,000 0.4665 2,333 15,000 1,675
9 5,000 0.4241 2,120 20,000 3,795
10 5,000 0.3855 1,928 25,000 5,723
Based on the information provided in part (2), it is clear that the cumulative cash
(4) flow in nominal dollars reached $0 at the end of Year 5. This means that the
nominal payback period is 5 years. The cumulative cash flow in present-value dollars
exceeds $0 when the Year 8 interest payment is received.
This means that the present-value payback period is roughly 7 years. If cash flows
were received on a continuous basis, the present-value payback period would be 7.28
years (=$658/$2,333).
(5)
Assuming a positive rate of interest, the present-value payback period is always longer than
the nominal payback period. This stems from the fact that present-value dollars are always
less than nominal dollars, and it therefore takes longer to receive a fixed dollar amount back
in terms of present-value dollars rather than in nominal terms.
Page # 156
12th Edition (September-2021)
Corporate Financial Management
By Md. Monowar Hossain, FCA, CPA,
FCMA,CISA,CPFA(UK),FCGA,FCS
md.monowar@gmail.com
Amount Present
16%
Item Years of value
Factor
cash flow of cash flow
Cost of equipment 0 $(30,000) 1.000 $(30,000)
Working capital requirement 0 $(40,000) 1.000 $(40,000)
Repair of equipment 5 $(2,500) 0.476* $(1,190)
Annual cash inflow from sale of new
1–6 $32,000 3.685** $117,920
product
Residual value of the equipment 6 $5,000 0.410* $2,050
Release of working capital 6 $40,000 0.410* $16,400
Net present value $65,180
*Value from “present value of $1 table”.
**Value from “present value of an annuity of $1 in arrears table”.
Conclusion: The new product should be introduced because its net present value is positive.
Page # 157
12th Edition (September-2021)
Corporate Financial Management
By Md. Monowar Hossain, FCA, CPA,
FCMA,CISA,CPFA(UK),FCGA,FCS
md.monowar@gmail.com
Required: Will it be advantageous to buy Plant-A or Plant-B? Substantiate your answer with help
of comparative unit cost of plants. Make other relevant assumption.
Decision: As the unit cost is less in proposed Plant-B, it may be recommended that it is
advantageous to acquire Plant-B.
Page # 158
12th Edition (September-2021)
Corporate Financial Management
By Md. Monowar Hossain, FCA, CPA,
FCMA,CISA,CPFA(UK),FCGA,FCS
md.monowar@gmail.com
Page # 159
12th Edition (September-2021)