1.

Types of Conflicts at NOVATEC

At NOVATEC, two primary types of conflicts are evident: Conflict of Objectives,

Strategies, and Procedures and Role Conflict.

Conflict of Objectives, Strategies, and Procedures:

This type of conflict occurs when there are disagreements on what actions to take,
how to implement these actions, and the strategies to achieve organizational goals.
In the case of NOVATEC, the operations director has proposed hiring new
consultants to handle the excessive workload and address past due bills. This
proposal has sparked a significant disagreement between the sales director and
the consulting director, leading to a conflict of objectives, strategies, and
procedures.

The sales director opposes the idea of augmenting staff. His primary concerns are
twofold. First, he believes that there isn't enough time to train new consultants
adequately, which could jeopardize the success of new projects. This concern
highlights a strategic disagreement on how to manage the introduction of new staff
and maintain project quality. Second, the sales director fears that paying new
consultants the same salary as senior consultants could lead to dissatisfaction
among experienced staff, who might feel undervalued despite their years of
experience. This points to a procedural conflict in how compensation and
recognition are managed within the organization.

On the other hand, the consulting director supports the proposal to hire additional
staff. He argues that the current consultants are overburdened with projects,
leading to delays and past due bills. From his perspective, augmenting the staff is
essential to distribute the workload more evenly, ensuring timely completion of
ongoing projects and enabling the company to take on new projects that could
generate additional revenue. This viewpoint underscores a different strategic
approach to achieving the organizational goals of efficiency and profitability.

The conflict between these two directors over the proposed solution to the
company's operational challenges exemplifies a classic conflict of objectives,
strategies, and procedures. Their differing perspectives on how to manage the
workload, train new staff, and compensate employees highlight the complexity of
aligning individual departmental goals with the overall organizational strategy.

Role Conflict:

A potential role conflict arises from the issue of salary equity. The sales director's
concern that senior consultants might feel undervalued if new consultants are hired
at the same salary level is indicative of a role conflict. Role conflicts occur when
there is ambiguity or disagreement about job responsibilities, expectations, and the
distribution of rewards.

In this case, senior consultants may feel that their experience and long-term
contributions are not being adequately recognized if new hires receive the same
salary. This could lead to dissatisfaction, decreased morale, and potentially
increased turnover if senior consultants seek employment elsewhere where their
experience is more valued. The role conflict here is not just about the financial
compensation but also about the recognition and appreciation of the senior
consultants' roles and contributions within the company.

Addressing role conflicts requires clear communication and transparent policies

regarding job roles, responsibilities, and reward systems. It is essential to ensure
that all employees feel valued and fairly compensated for their contributions to
maintain a positive and productive work environment.

2. Key Variables in the Conflict

The conflict at NOVATEC is driven by three key variables: workload distribution,

training and readiness of new staff, and compensation and recognition. Each
of these variables plays a crucial role in shaping the perspectives and concerns of
the directors involved.
Workload Distribution:

The primary issue identified by the consulting director is the excessive workload
carried by the current consultants. He argues that the team is overburdened,
leading to delays in project completion and an accumulation of past due bills. This
workload imbalance affects the efficiency and effectiveness of the consultancy
office. By advocating for the hiring of new consultants, the consulting director aims
to redistribute the workload more evenly, ensuring that ongoing projects are
completed on time and new projects can be undertaken to generate additional
revenue.

This variable highlights the operational inefficiencies within the current system.
Overworked employees are likely to experience burnout, which can decrease
productivity and job satisfaction. Proper workload distribution is essential for
maintaining a healthy work environment and ensuring that projects are managed
effectively. Addressing this variable requires a strategic approach to resource
allocation and project management.

Training and Readiness of New Staff:

The sales director raises a critical concern regarding the readiness of new
consultants to handle projects effectively. He believes that there is insufficient time
to train new hires adequately, which could jeopardize the success of ongoing and
new projects. This concern reflects a significant risk associated with bringing in
new staff without proper preparation and integration into the company’s workflow.

The training and readiness of new staff is a crucial variable because it directly
impacts the quality of service delivery and the company's reputation. Inadequately
trained consultants may make errors, leading to client dissatisfaction and potential
financial losses. Effective training programs are essential to ensure that new hires
can perform at the expected level and contribute positively to the company's goals.
This variable requires a detailed plan for onboarding, training, and monitoring new
staff to ensure they are adequately prepared for their roles.

Compensation and Recognition:

Another critical variable is the compensation and recognition of senior consultants.
The sales director is concerned that hiring new consultants at the same salary level
as experienced staff could lead to feelings of unappreciation among the senior
consultants. This issue touches on the fairness and equity of the company’s
compensation practices and the recognition of employees’ contributions and
experience.

Compensation and recognition are fundamental to employee motivation and

retention. If senior consultants feel that their experience and loyalty to the company
are not valued, they may seek employment elsewhere, leading to a loss of valuable
talent and institutional knowledge. Addressing this variable involves ensuring that
the compensation structure reflects the different levels of experience and
contributions within the team. It also requires creating a system of recognition that
acknowledges and rewards the efforts and achievements of long-term employees.

3. Alignment of Directors' Positions with the Managing Director's

Objective

The positions of the three directors—operations, sales, and consulting—each

reflect distinct concerns and priorities within the overarching goal of improving
NOVATEC's profitability and efficiency. The managing director's primary objective is
to implement changes that will enhance the company's ability to collect past due
bills and manage new projects effectively, without causing dissatisfaction among
the current staff. To evaluate whether the positions of the three directors align with
this objective, we need to delve deeper into their respective viewpoints and
analyze how they intersect with the managing director’s goals.

Operations Director’s Position:

The operations director is focused on addressing the backlog of past due bills and
ensuring that the company can take on new projects. This perspective is driven by
the need to enhance cash flow and profitability. The operations director proposes
augmenting the staff to manage the workload more efficiently. This approach aligns
directly with the managing director’s objective of improving financial performance
through better resource management and increased project capacity.

However, the operations director must also consider the potential impact on current
staff morale and the integration of new consultants into the team. To fully align with
the managing director’s goals, the operations director's plan should include a
detailed strategy for onboarding and training new consultants, as well as measures
to ensure that the existing team feels valued and secure in their roles.

Sales Director’s Position:

The sales director is concerned about the risks associated with bringing in new
consultants. His primary worries include the potential for inadequate training
leading to project failures and the possibility of demoralizing senior consultants by
offering new hires the same salary. These concerns highlight the sales director's
focus on maintaining the quality of project execution and safeguarding the morale
and loyalty of experienced staff.

The sales director’s position, while protective of current staff and project quality,
appears to be at odds with the immediate need to increase capacity to manage
new and ongoing projects. However, this position also aligns with the managing
director’s objective in terms of risk management and employee retention. The
managing director does not want to provoke dissatisfaction that could lead to staff
turnover. To align more closely with the managing director’s goals, the sales
director’s concerns should be addressed through a structured training program for
new hires and a revised compensation strategy that differentiates between new
and experienced consultants.

Consulting Director’s Position:

The consulting director supports the augmentation of staff due to the excessive
workload borne by the current team. He argues that hiring new consultants is
essential to prevent burnout, meet project deadlines, and reduce the backlog of
past due bills. This position aligns with the managing director’s objective of
improving efficiency and increasing revenue by enhancing the company’s capacity
to handle more projects.

The consulting director's focus on workload management and operational

efficiency supports the managing director's goal of improving overall company
performance. However, the consulting director must also consider the sales
director's concerns about training and staff morale. By advocating for a phased
hiring approach, combined with a robust training program and clear communication
about the benefits of the new hires to the existing team, the consulting director can
help bridge the gap between immediate operational needs and long-term staff
satisfaction.

4. Comprehensive Proposal for Conflict Management at NOVATEC

To effectively address the conflicts at NOVATEC and implement a viable solution, it

is essential to apply a structured approach that encompasses the phases of
conflict, diagnosis of the conflict, resolution strategies, and mediation tactics. This
comprehensive proposal will guide the operations director in managing the
identified conflicts and aligning the directors' positions with the managing director's
objectives.

Phases of the Conflict

1. Escalation:

-Stage 1: Rationalization: The conflict begins with a disagreement, where

the operations director tries to rationalize the need for new hires to manage
the workload.

- Stage 2: Positioning: As disagreements intensify, the sales director and

consulting director solidify their positions, with the sales director expressing
concerns about training and morale, and the consulting director emphasizing
the necessity of additional staff.
 - Stage 3: Polarization: Hopes for easy resolution fade, and the parties
become more entrenched in their viewpoints.

- Stage 4: Breakdown: Respect and tolerance diminish, leading to heated

exchanges and a potential breakdown in communication.

- Stage 5: Confrontation: The conflict reaches its peak, with both sides
prepared for a prolonged standoff.

2. Stalemate:

- A period where neither party is willing to make concessions, but the high
cost of conflict begins to weigh on both sides. This phase presents an
opportunity for reflection and recalibration of strategies.

3. De-escalation:

- Step 1: Recognition: One or both parties recognize the need to move

toward a resolution.

- Step 2: Concessions: Initial concessions are made to build trust.

- Step 3: Negotiation: Detailed negotiations are conducted to address key

issues and find common ground.

Diagnosis of the Conflict

The conflict at NOVATEC can be diagnosed by examining the underlying issues

and identifying the key variables that need to be addressed:

1. Workload Management:

The consulting director highlights the excessive workload and the need for
additional staff to manage ongoing and new projects efficiently.

2. Training and Integration:

The sales director is concerned about the adequacy of training for new consultants
and the potential risk to project success. This variable also includes ensuring that
new hires are integrated smoothly into the team.
3. Staff Morale and Compensation:

The sales director’s worries about the morale of senior consultants due to equal
pay for new hires are crucial. Maintaining staff morale and ensuring fair
compensation practices are vital for retaining experienced employees.

Resolution of the Conflict

A successful resolution strategy will involve addressing the concerns of all parties
while aligning their interests with the managing director's objectives. The following
steps outline a potential resolution:

1. Phased Hiring Approach:

Implement a phased hiring plan to gradually integrate new consultants. This

approach allows for better management of training and reduces the immediate
impact on project quality.

2. Structured Training Program:

Develop a comprehensive training program for new hires, ensuring they are well-
prepared before taking on significant project responsibilities. This program should
involve mentorship from senior consultants.

3. Compensation Review:

Conduct a review of the compensation structure to differentiate between new and

senior consultants. Introducing performance-based incentives can also help
maintain morale.

4. Communication and Involvement:

Engage senior consultants in the hiring and training process, making them feel
valued and involved in the company's growth. Regular updates and transparent
communication about the changes can alleviate concerns.
Strategies of Mediation

Effective mediation strategies can help bridge the gaps between the directors’
positions and foster a collaborative environment:

1. Active Listening:

Encourage all parties to actively listen to each other's concerns and perspectives.
This practice helps build empathy and understanding, which are crucial for finding
common ground.

2. Neutral Facilitation:

Utilize a neutral facilitator to guide discussions and ensure that all voices are
heard. The facilitator can help keep the conversation focused and constructive.

3. Joint Problem-Solving:

Promote a collaborative approach to problem-solving, where all parties work

together to identify mutually beneficial solutions. This strategy reinforces the idea
that everyone is working towards a common goal.

4. Focus on Interests, Not Positions:

Shift the discussion from entrenched positions to underlying interests.

Understanding the core concerns of each director can reveal areas of agreement
and potential compromises.

5. Style of Negotiation for Achieving the Managing Director's Goal

The managing director at NOVATEC seeks to implement changes that will address
the issues of overdue bills and the burden of ongoing projects without alienating
the existing staff. To achieve this objective, it is crucial to adopt a negotiation style
that aligns with the desired outcomes and addresses the concerns of all parties
involved. Given the context and the nature of the conflicts, a collaborative
negotiation style, also known as integrative or win-win negotiation, is most
appropriate. This style can be supplemented with elements of the accommodating
and compromising styles to ensure a balanced and effective approach.

Collaborative (Integrative) Negotiation

The collaborative negotiation style focuses on finding solutions that satisfy the
interests of all parties involved. It is characterized by open communication, mutual
respect, and a commitment to finding a win-win outcome. This style is particularly
suitable for NOVATEC's situation for several reasons:

1. Aligning Interests:

The collaborative style allows the operations director to address the concerns of
both the sales and consulting directors by aligning their interests with the managing
director's goals. By understanding and addressing the underlying needs of each
party, a more sustainable and mutually beneficial solution can be developed.

2. Building Trust and Cooperation:

This style emphasizes transparency and trust-building. By fostering a cooperative

environment, the operations director can mitigate fears and resistance from the
sales director while gaining support from the consulting director. Trust is crucial for
ensuring that all directors feel their concerns are valued and addressed.

3. Comprehensive Problem Solving:

Collaborative negotiation encourages brainstorming and creative problem-solving.

This approach can lead to innovative solutions that might not be apparent through
other negotiation styles. For instance, the operations director can work with both
directors to develop a phased training plan that addresses the sales director's

By adopting a collaborative negotiation style, supplemented with elements of

accommodating and compromising styles, the operations director can effectively
navigate the conflicts at NOVATEC. This approach will help align the interests of all
directors with the managing director's objective of improving efficiency and
profitability without compromising staff morale. The structured and empathetic
approach ensures that all parties feel heard and valued, fostering a cooperative
environment that supports the company's growth and success. This
comprehensive negotiation strategy not only resolves the immediate conflicts but
also builds a foundation for ongoing collaboration and mutual respect within
NOVATEC's leadership team.