Professional Documents
Culture Documents
List of Cases Appearance and Jid
List of Cases Appearance and Jid
TUTORIAL/PRACTICAL
STATUTES& CASES
CLPE OUTLINE
WEEK 6-7
O. 12 & 13 ROC
• Appearance shows intention to defend and submission to the jurisdiction of the court
• Form 11
• O. 12 r. 2 and 3 ROC
• O. 12 r. 9 ROC
o O. 12 r. 1(2) ROC
o O. 76 r. 6 ROC
o O. 12 r. 4 ROC
Note that the time limit specified in O. 12 r. 4 ROC does not mean that if D has not entered
appearance within the prescribed time he cannot enter an appearance at all (but see rule 5(2)
ROC)
Note: Judgment in default of appearance cannot be entered in all cases e.g. (1) account (2)
injunction (3) specific performance (4) declaration (5) rectification
o Leong Seng Kiat v Khaw See Song [1988] 2 MLJ 365 (specific performance)
o Matland Sdn. Bhd. v Timatch Sdn. Bhd. [2014] 4 AMR 645 (injunction))
(b) Documents: Original writ duly indorsed as to service (O. 10 r. 1(4) - day, date, time, on
whom), affidavit verifying service (Form 135), two completed judgment forms duly stamped
(Form 75), certificate of non-appearance (Form 12)
• See also
(a) Final
o O. 13 r. 1 and r. 4 ROC
(b) Interlocutory
• O. 13 r. 2 and r. 3 ROC
• Procedure: O. 37 r. 1 ROC
o Amalan Tepat Sdn. Bhd. v Panflex Sdn. Bhd. [2011] 7 CLJ 121
"The principle obviously is that unless and until the Court has pronounced a judgment upon the
merits or by consent, it is to have the power to revoke the expression of its coercive power where
that has been obtained by a failure to follow any of the rules of procedure."
• Tuan Haji Ahmad Abdul Rahman v Arab Malaysian Finance Berhad [1996] 1 CLJ 241.
o Ban Huat Seng Co Ltd v Lee Poh Soo [1967] 1 MLJ 145
o Tian Yan Onn etc v National Holdings Ltd [1988] 2 MLJ 669 (7 months 12 days - too late)
o Cheung Kong Plantations Sdn Bhd v Malayan United Finance Bhd [2000] 3 MLJ 265
• Delay merely a factor to be taken into account. Other factors, e.g. irregularity, defence on the
merits must be taken into account
• Fira Development Sdn Bhd v Goldwin Sdn Bhd [1989] 1 M.L.J. 40 (Decided before 0. 42 r. 13
ROC).
• Lai Yoke Ngan & Anor v Chin Teck Kwee & Anor [1997] 2 MLJ 565
• Lee Tain Tshung v Hong Leong Finance Bhd [2000]3 MLJ 364
(e) If P's judgment is a regular judgment in default D must show some evidence of prima facie
defence
• Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation v Ismail bin Daud & Anor [1978] 2 MLJ 160
• Dialdas & Co (Pte) Ltd v Sin Sin & Co [1984] 2 MLJ 223
12. "Except with the leave of the Court, no judgment in default of appearance or of pleading
shall be entered against the Government in civil proceedings against the Government or in third
party proceedings against the Government"
• O. 73 r. 7 ROC
o Philip Securities (Pte) v Yong Tet Miaw [1988] 3 MLJ 61 (Court has discretion).
o Cheow Chew Khoon v Abdul Johari [1995] 1 MLJ 457(judgment is irregular; to be set aside)
o Development & Commercial Bank Berhad v Aspatra Corporation Sdn Bhd & Anor (1996) 1
CLJ 141
o Lee Tain Tshung v Hong Leong Finance Bhd [2000] 3 MLJ 364
14. Costs
THANK YOU.