This is puzzling. It’s one page of an invoice, and I hesitate to describe it in any more detail for fear that I’m taking it out of context. In the motion, this is described as an invoice for “over $2.5 million in alleged ‘damages’ relating to the 2011 season.” The motion pegs the date on this invoice at Sept. 13 and says O’Sullivan and Fulmer said the league would not allow the team to play in 2012 if it didn’t pay. It did not. BUT ... the league denies that it asked Borislow to pay $2.5 million.
This is puzzling. It’s one page of an invoice, and I hesitate to describe it in any more detail for fear that I’m taking it out of context. In the motion, this is described as an invoice for “over $2.5 million in alleged ‘damages’ relating to the 2011 season.” The motion pegs the date on this invoice at Sept. 13 and says O’Sullivan and Fulmer said the league would not allow the team to play in 2012 if it didn’t pay. It did not. BUT ... the league denies that it asked Borislow to pay $2.5 million.
This is puzzling. It’s one page of an invoice, and I hesitate to describe it in any more detail for fear that I’m taking it out of context. In the motion, this is described as an invoice for “over $2.5 million in alleged ‘damages’ relating to the 2011 season.” The motion pegs the date on this invoice at Sept. 13 and says O’Sullivan and Fulmer said the league would not allow the team to play in 2012 if it didn’t pay. It did not. BUT ... the league denies that it asked Borislow to pay $2.5 million.