Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 3 - 2024
Lecture 3 - 2024
Lecture 3 - 2024
Business
Lecture 3
Wind resource modeling
Michael Child
Wind resource modeling
Wind resource assessment
Wind resource modeling?
What does it mean?
https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2020
Global Costs and Capacity Factors
https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2020
Wind resource modeling
How is it done?
1. Preliminary assessment
• Existing wind resource assessment
• Use any existing wind measurements made nearby
2. Wind measurements
3. Use of long-term wind and weather statistics
4. Wind farm modeling, including 'micrositing'
• Various wind farm modeling tools are in use (Wind
Farm Design tools, or WFD tools)
1. Preliminary assessment of wind resources
Finnish Wind Atlas
• Wind rose
developed
using the Wind
Atlas tool for
the forest at
the back of the
university
Activity:
https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/wind-atlas
2. Wind measurements at the site
Source: https://www.vaisala.com/en/products/instruments-
sensors-and-other-measurement-devices/weather-stations-and-
sensors/wa25
Ultrasonic anemometer
Image:
https://www.thiesclima.com/en/Products/W
ind-Ultrasonic-Anemometer/?art=350
Example
Thies Ultrasonic 2D anemometer
Image:
https://www.thiesclima.com/en/Products/W
ind-Ultrasonic-Anemometer/?art=350
Installation of sensors on the mast
• Anemometers are typically installed on
three levels
• The wind gradient is determined
(wind shear) and wind direction
variations at different altitudes
(wind veer)
• Also temperature measurements at 3
heights
• Atmospheric stability (vertical
temperature gradient)
• Double sensors at all heights, on both
sides of the mast to eliminate the
shading effect
• Pressure and humidity are also usually
measured
• Good accuracy requires calibrated
sensors and careful installation
LUT measurement arrangements used in wind
measurement projects in Puumala and Joutseno.
Installation Finnish Meteorological Institute
LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)
▪ The device emits a laser beam into the atmosphere and
measures the beam reflected from atmospheric particles
▪ Wind measurement is based on the Doppler phenomenon
▪ The device sends a laser beam at a certain frequency
into the atmosphere 200 - 300 m
▪ The beam is reflected back from atmospheric particles,
changing its frequency
▪ The change in frequency tells you the speed of the
particles and the wind
▪ Atmospheric particles are aerosols, dust particles, water
droplets
▪ LIDAR emits more rays into the atmosphere with different
orientations in order to determine
▪ Wind speed horizontally and vertically
TRANSMITTER
▪ Wind direction
RECEIVER
▪ Measurements are obtained from several heights up to
approx. 200 meters
▪ Today, LIDAR measurements are also bankable
LIDAR - example
Example: Zeph IR ZX300 onshore lidar
Source: https://www.vaisala.com/en/wind-lidars/wind-energy
LIDAR
• Challenges
• Power supply
• Snow and ice
• Window cleaning
• Vandalism
• Data transmission
• GSM network
Acoustic doppler-sensor
▪ WAsP (Wind Atlas Analysis and Application Program = WAAAP => WAsP)
▪ Developed at the RISØ Institute in Denmark
▪ Based on linear Navier Stokes equations
▪ Works well on flat terrain, but in complex terrain (hills, forest) may be
inaccurate
▪ Today, a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) option for complex
terrain modeling is also available
▪ Still the “de facto” modeling program in wind resource modeling
▪ www.wasp.dk
WFD (Wind Farm Design) tools
▪ Wind Sim
▪ Used in modeling WAsP - more complex flow model.
▪ CFDs give more reliable results in complex terrain.
▪ www.windsim.com
▪ Wind Farmer
▪ Provides tools for overall wind farm modeling
▪ https://www.dnvgl.com/services/windfarmer-3766
▪ Wind Pro
▪ Provides tools for overall wind farm modeling
▪ http://www.emd.dk/windpro/
WFD tools in modeling
Example
▪ VTT has analyzed Meri-Pori wind farm production by 4
different methods
1. Wind Sim analysis using local measurements
2. WAsP analysis using local measurements
3. WAsP analysis using Wind Atlas 2.5 km node wind
data
4. WAsP analysis using windmill 250 m node wind data
▪ The table shows the differences between actual and
modeled production
▪ Positive indicates production exceeded estimates
Menetelmä 1 2 3 4
Turbiinit 1-4, Hilska 8.10 % 23.80 % 46.30 % 33.70 % Turbines 1-4 @ Meri-Pori wind farm
Turbiinit 6-9 3.00 % -6,1% 15.50 % 12.90 %
Meri-Pori wind farm
Menetelmä 1 2 3 4
Turbiinit 1-4, Hilska 8.10 % 23.80 % 46.30 % 33.70 %
TURBINES 6-9 Turbiinit 6-9 3.00 % -6,1% 15.50 % 12.90 %
Tahkoluoto
TURBINES 1-4 + HS
Mäntyluoto
Source: Google Earth
Sources and other literature
Sources