Name : FEBI IWAN JASADI

Nim : E1D022189

Class : IV C

The Debate on Moving Indonesia's Capital to

Kalimantan
The decision to move Indonesia’s capital from Jakarta to East Kalimantan has
sparked significant debate. This bold move, driven by various socio-economic and
environmental motivations, is met with both enthusiasm and skepticism. To
understand the full scope of this decision, it is essential to delve into the
arguments presented by skeptics, assess the government’s position, and examine
the rebuttals and supports for this monumental shift.
Skeptical Viewpoint
Critics argue that moving the capital is an unnecessary and overly ambitious
project that diverts attention and resources from more pressing issues. Jakarta,
despite its challenges, remains the economic and cultural heart of Indonesia.
Relocating the capital could lead to economic disruptions and significant costs.
The environmental concerns are also prominent, as the construction of a new city
in East Kalimantan could lead to deforestation and harm the local ecosystem.
Moreover, there is skepticism about whether the move will truly alleviate the
problems faced by Jakarta, such as congestion, pollution, and sinking land.
Position of the Government
The Indonesian government posits that moving the capital to East Kalimantan is a
strategic decision aimed at promoting more equitable development across the
country. Jakarta’s population density and environmental degradation have
reached critical levels, making it increasingly unsustainable as a capital city. The
new location in Kalimantan offers a less congested, more geographically central
location that can foster growth and development in less-developed regions.
Additionally, this move is seen as a step toward diversifying economic activities
away from the dominant Java island, thereby reducing regional disparities.
Rebuttal to Skeptics
Addressing the skeptics, proponents argue that the move is not only feasible but
necessary. The cost concerns, while valid, are countered by the potential long-
term benefits of decongesting Jakarta and stimulating economic growth in
Kalimantan. The environmental risks associated with construction are being
mitigated through careful planning and sustainable practices. Furthermore, the
argument that Jakarta will continue to face its problems without the capital status
overlooks the potential for more targeted interventions once the administrative
burden is lifted.
Support for the Move
Supporters highlight the potential for a more balanced national development. East
Kalimantan’s selection is strategic due to its lower risk of natural disasters
compared to Jakarta, which is prone to flooding and earthquakes. The new capital
is envisioned as a smart, sustainable city, incorporating green technology and
infrastructure. This initiative aligns with global trends where countries relocate
their capitals to address congestion, distribute population, and stimulate
economic growth in underdeveloped areas.
Rebuttal to Supporters
Despite these assurances, some argue that the challenges of relocating a capital
are immense. Historical precedents, such as Brazil’s move to Brasília or Myanmar’s
shift to Naypyidaw, illustrate mixed outcomes. Concerns remain about the actual
execution of such a complex project in terms of logistical, financial, and social
aspects. Additionally, there is skepticism about the government’s ability to
maintain focus and commitment over the long duration required to complete such
an extensive undertaking.
Further Support
In response, further support for the move points to successful capital relocations
in other nations, which have led to significant long-term benefits. The
government’s comprehensive planning and phased approach to the move aim to
mitigate initial disruptions. Furthermore, the creation of a new capital provides a
unique opportunity to implement modern urban planning principles from the
ground up, potentially setting a new standard for Indonesian cities. The move is
also expected to attract international investments, boosting the national economy
and creating jobs.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while skepticism about moving Indonesia's capital to East
Kalimantan is valid, the government's position presents a compelling case for the
potential benefits. The initiative promises to address Jakarta’s overcrowding and
environmental challenges while promoting regional development and national
unity. Despite the formidable challenges, the strategic advantages and long-term
vision underpinning the move offer a hopeful outlook. Thus, the decision to
relocate the capital, while fraught with complexities, represents a bold step
towards a more sustainable and balanced future for Indonesia.