Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HRMAProject 1-5 (Atul Prakash)
HRMAProject 1-5 (Atul Prakash)
Session 2023-24
PGDM HR 05 - HRMA
PROJECTS 1-5
1. The majority of participants believe that job satisfaction is crucial for the overall wellbeing and
performance of employees.
2. The majority of participants believe that job satisfaction impacts an employee’s performance.
4. Participants perceive that job satisfaction does affect employee retention and turnover rates within an
organization.
5. Most participants feel that job satisfaction significantly boosts employee morale.
6. Participants are optimistic that job satisfaction positively affects collaboration and teamwork.
7. A portion of participants feel that job satisfaction has a neutral impact on maintaining the physical
and mental health of employees.
8. A portion of participants feel that job satisfaction has a neutral impact on employees' ability to
deliver work efficiently.
9. A portion of participants feel that job satisfaction has a neutral impact on fostering innovation and
creativity within the organization.
10. Participants believe that job satisfaction is neutral or aligned in some way with achieving the
organization's goals and objectives.
11. Participants are optimistic that job satisfaction influences an organization’s investment in employee
development and training.
12. The majority of participants have given a rating of 5, indicating the overall importance of job
satisfaction in the workplace.
13. Participants feel that managers and supervisors play a moderate or significant role in influencing the
job satisfaction of their team members.
14. Participants feel that employee job satisfaction positively affects customer satisfaction.
15. Participants feel that employee job satisfaction significantly reduces workplace stress experienced
by employees.
16. Participants feel that employee job satisfaction is extremely crucial for the long-term success and
sustainability of the organization.
PROJECT - 3
Calculate eNPS score.
Numerical question 1 : eNPS (employee net promoter score) "Out of the 100 employees
surveyed, 70 gave a score of 9 or 10, 20 gave a score of 7 or 8, and 10 gave a score of 0 to 6
on the question: 'On a scale of 0-10, how likely are you to recommend our organization as a
great place to work to your friends or colleagues?' What is the eNPS score for the
organization?"
Ans. We have 100 employees, so if you have, for example, 70 Promoters, 20 Passives, and 10
Detractors:
= 70%
= 20%
D= (10/100) *100%
=10%
eNPS = 70 – 10
= 60
Numerical question 2: "Out of the 100 employees surveyed, 30 gave a score of 9 or 10, 25
gave a score of 7 or 8, and 45 gave a score of 0 to 6 on the question: 'On a scale of 0-10, how
likely are you to recommend our organization as a great place to work to your friends or
colleagues?' What is the eNPS score for the organization?"
Ans. We have 100 employees, so if you have, for example, 30 Promoters, 25 Passives, and 45
Detractors:
= 30%
= 25%
D= (45/100) *100%
= 45%
eNPS = 30 - 45
= -15
Numerical question 3: "Out of the 500 employees surveyed, 100 gave a score of 9 or 10,
150 gave a score of 7 or 8, and 250 gave a score of 0 to 6 on the question: 'On a scale of 0-10,
how likely are you to recommend our organization as a great place to work to your friends or
colleagues?' What is the eNPS score for the organization?"
Ans. We have 500 employees, so if you have, for example, 100 Promoters, 150 Passives, and
250Detractors:
= 20%
= 30%
D= (250/500) *100%
=50%
eNPS = 20 - 50
= -30
PROJECT 3
3. Analytics team was soon able focus on more "vable adding" analytics
5. the initial steps involved reducing the volume of routine reports by 70%.
6. The shift allowed CLE to develop key measures for the HR function
9. They were alble to segment tasks based on the Skill set of the team.
11. With the standards in place CLE then termed to estalilishing a basic scorecard
approach to illustrate the data.
12. CCE faced challenges such as technology barriers, the need for specialized analytics
Skills.
Regression Analysis
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.999928996
R Square 0.999857998
Adjusted R Square 0.998863981
Standard Error 701.713058
Observations 9
ANOVA
Significance
df SS MS F F
Regression 7 3467063154 495294736.3 1005.876347 0.024273173
Residual 1 492401.2158 492401.2158
Total 8 3467555556
Standard P- Lower Upper
Coefficients Error t Stat value Lower 95% Upper 95% 95.0% 95.0%
Brand value 4966.57 519.04 9.57 0.07 -1628.42 11561.55 -1628.42 11561.55
Interpretation:
• If a person has more experience which is an independent variable (X), then his salary
(X) would be higher.
• More the score of brand value, more would be the salary of the employee.
• Skills of an employee are also positively correlated with the salary of the employee.
• The higher the score of location (non- metro city), the less would be the salary of the
employee.
• Age and gender are also affecting the salary of the employee due to industry
benchmarking and the career growth.