CEO's Overseas background and Corporate Value: A Study

based on Listed company data

Abstract

The greater part of the current examinations on the affecting elements of Finance
investor relations are directed according to the viewpoints of corporate qualities,
corporate administration and value structure, overlooking the heterogeneity of the
subject of Finance investor relations choice — CEO. As per the highest level
hypothesis, the CEO's Abroad Conduct foundation will impact their mental premise
and values, which thus influences their choices on the organization's procedure. Brand
hypothesis More show, because of the undeniable social contrasts between nations,
CEO abroad review or work period is a "touchy period", the CEO will encounter the
course of "brand", framed with the abroad climate of mental qualities and capacity
qualities, regardless of whether the CEO home, the abroad experience "brand"
attributes actually endure, influence the CEO the executives choice of the
organization. In light of this, in view of the hypothetical examination, this paper lays
out A different straight relapse model in view of the management information of a-
share non-monetary recorded organizations in 2009-2018 to examine the effect of
CEO's Abroad Conduct foundation on the Finance investor relationship of endeavors.
That's what the exact outcomes show: (1) the CEO's Abroad Conduct foundation can
fundamentally further develop the corporate Finance investor relations, and the end is
as yet substantial in the wake of adding apparatus factors to control endogenous
issues, changing the Finance investor relationship organization factors, Really
including the Individual Capital Construction Hypothesis attributes of the CEO, and
controlling the common fixed effect.(2) More examination results demonstrate the
way that the abroad working foundation of CEO can altogether further develop the
Finance investor relations of undertakings, while the abroad learning foundation of
CEO essentially affects the Finance investor relations.(3) On account of enormous
CEO the management independence and low straightforwardness of the organization,
the positive effect of CEO Abroad Social foundation on corporate Finance investor
relations is more huge. The examination in this paper not just enhances the research
study aftereffects of the affecting variables of corporate Finance investor relations, yet
in addition features the significance of CEO heterogeneity to corporate choice
according to the point of view of the Individual Capital Construction Hypothesis
attributes of the CEO. What's more, the research study consequences of this paper
likewise give a Meaning of pertinent ideas for reinforcing the security of Finance
investors in China's capital market, and give a possible approach to recorded
organizations to work on the administration of Finance investor relations, which has
solid hypothetical worth and down to earth importance.
Key words: Overseas Behavioral background; Finance investor relations; CEO
echelon theory; Imprinting Theory
 Table of content

CEO's Overseas background and Corporate Value: A Study based on Listed company data...................1

Abstract......................................................................................................................................................1

1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................4

1.1 Research Background..........................................................................................................................4

1.2 Study significance................................................................................................................................6

1.2.1 Theoretical Significance...................................................................................................................6

1.2.2 Practical significance........................................................................................................................7

1.3 Study content and methods..................................................................................................................8

1.3.1 Research content...............................................................................................................................8

1.3.2 Research methods.............................................................................................................................9

1.4 Research and innovation....................................................................................................................10

2. Related concepts and theoretical foundations......................................................................................11

2.1 Definition of relevant concepts..........................................................................................................11

2.1.1 CEO echelon theory........................................................................................................................11

2.1.2 Imprinting theory............................................................................................................................12

2.1.3 Power theory of management.........................................................................................................13

2.2 Theoretical basis results of CEOs......................................................................................................14

2.2.1 Personal Capital Structure Theory characteristics of CEOs...........................................................14

2.2.2 Overseas Behavioral background of CEOs.....................................................................................16

2.3 Finance investor relations research results.........................................................................................18

2.3.1 Definition and measurement methods of Finance investor relations..............................................18

2.3.2. Communication mode and positioning of Finance investor relations............................................21

2.3.3 The role and economic consequences of Finance investor relations..............................................23

2.4 CEO background and Finance investor relations...............................................................................24

2.5 Related concepts and theoretical foundations....................................................................................25

3. Theoretical analysis and research hypotheses......................................................................................27

4. Research Assumptions and Model Design...........................................................................................29

4.1 Research Assumptions, Sample Selection and Data Sources............................................................29

4.2 Variable Selection..............................................................................................................................29

4.2.1 The explained Model (1) Variables................................................................................................29

4.2.2 The explanatory Model (2) Variables.............................................................................................30

4.2.3 Control variables.............................................................................................................................31

4.3 Empirical model design.....................................................................................................................34

5. The empirical results and analysis.......................................................................................................35

5.1 Descriptive statistics..........................................................................................................................35

5.2 Correlation analysis............................................................................................................................37

5.3 Analysis of the regression results.......................................................................................................38

5.4 More analysis.....................................................................................................................................40

5.4.1 Group by Overseas Behavioral background of CEO..............................................................41

5.4.2 Group by CEO management autonomy..........................................................................................42

5.4.3 Group by company transparency....................................................................................................45

5.5. Robustness test..................................................................................................................................48

5.5.1 endogeneity test...............................................................................................................................48

5.5.2 Replace the Finance investor relations measurement method........................................................50

5.5.3 Replace the control variables..........................................................................................................52

6. Study conclusions, recommendations, and limitations........................................................................55

6.1 Study Conclusion...............................................................................................................................55

6.2 Policy recommendations....................................................................................................................56

6.3 Study Limitations...............................................................................................................................57

Reference documentation.........................................................................................................................59
1. Introduction

1.1 Research Background

With the ceaseless turn of events and improvement of monetary business sectors and
awesome, esteem speculation idea increasingly more by the consideration of the
Money investors, the organization's monetary circumstance, vital goals, corporate
administration data bit by bit become a significant reference element of Money
investors choice, the rising Money investor data interest, anxious to comprehend
organization data however much as could be expected, anticipating direct discourse
with organization the management. To reinforce the data correspondence with Money
investors and meet the data needs of Money investors, the recorded organizations
started to set up full-time divisions or staff to complete the Money investor relations
work. Finance investor relations (IR-Money investor Relations) alludes to the drawn
out connection between recorded organizations and Money investors, in 1953, general
electric, administrator of the Ralph Cordiner previously proposed the idea of Money
investor relations the executives, used to characterize the recorded organization to
decrease the data deviation, Money investors' acknowledgment and backing of the
organization, dynamic collaboration with Money investors or willful data divulgence
the management conduct. In 1969, the Public Relationship for Money investor
Relations (NIRI) was laid out, and afterward recorded organizations in the UK, Japan,
Germany, France and different nations additionally contended to direct Fund investor
relations exercises.
In 2001, the financial fraud scandal of Enron company was exposed, which triggered
a crisis of trust in the information disclosure of listed companies, and the stock index
fell continuously. To rebuild Finance investor confidence, the following year
sarbanes-oxley act, to strengthen the disclosure of listed companies authenticity,
comprehensiveness, accuracy, corporate Finance investor relations management get
rapid development, listed companies generally began to set up Finance investor
relations management professional department or personnel, responsible for
interactive communication with Finance investors, answer Finance investors
questions, enhance Finance investors understanding of the company, reshape the
market confidence (Feng Yanjie and Xu Bo, 2014). At the same time, Mr Banes-oxact
before, most Finance investor relations management report to the CFO or corporate
public relations department, after the bill, most of the company's Finance investor
relations work directly affiliated to the CEO, by the CEO of corporate Finance
investor relations work directly arrangement and deployment (Bloomberg, 2013).
Advancement up until this point, created nations Money investor relations the
management has become experienced, the executives means and ways additionally
keep an eye on enhancement and normalization, liable for the work typically have
high expert level, the organization the executives circumstance and future turn of
events, acquainted with finance, bookkeeping, endeavor the management and
showcasing and other related proficient information, can all the more likely speak
with Money investors for the organization monetary data (Laskin, 2009). Conversely,
the Money investor relations work began moderately late in China. In 2001, a few
homegrown undertakings recorded abroad started to complete the Money investor
relations work to meet the abroad administrative necessities. In 2005, the protections
and fates commission gave the Money investor relations between recorded
organizations and work rules "(hereinafter alluded to as the" rules ") 1, document
brings up:" to safeguard the interests of Money investors, improve the data
correspondence between Money investors, recorded organizations ought to be joined
with the particular circumstance, decide to set up Money investor relations division,
completely, consistence, fair, dynamic revelation of data, through multi-channel,
staggered two-way correspondence with Money investors, diminish the data hole,
structure the harmless cooperation, upgrade Money investors to the organization,
structure a steady quality Money investor base."Up to now, China's Money investor
relations work is still in the beginning phase of advancement, and more hypothetical
outcomes and observational outcomes are direly expected to help Greater turn of
events (Chen Dongjie et al., 2018).
At present, most of the studies on the influencing factors of Finance investor relations
are conducted from the perspectives of corporate characteristics, corporate
governance and shareholding structure. Forker (1992) Research shows that when the
chairman of the management of directors serves as CEO, that is, the two positions are
combined, the separation of decision management and control is absent, the
company's information disclosure will decrease, and the Finance investor relations
activities cannot be well implemented. Wallace and Naser (1995) believe that
companies with high liquidity will be more motivated to communicate with Finance
investors in order to attract Finance investors' attention. Similarly, Ettredge et al.
(2001) showed that companies with good performance will also actively engage in
Finance investor relations activities. Zhao Ying (2009) took a sample of 800 listed
companies on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and found that the size of the company
would have a positive effect on Finance investor relations, but the debt level would
have a negative effect on Finance investor relations. Xiao et al. (2004), taking the 300
largest Chinese a-share listed companies in China, found that state-owned holdings
were significantly negatively correlated with the disclosure level of the company. In
addition, compared with other industries, the level of Finance investor relations in the
information technology industry was significantly higher.
Li Zhibin (2013) utilized the poll testing overview to fabricate the Money investor
relations markers for observational proof and observed that the interior control of the
organization was essentially decidedly associated with the Money investor
relationship, and when the value fixation was low, the connection was more self-
evident. In any case, Money investor relations are impacted by these variables, yet
additionally by the organization's top supervisors. Truth be told, as the subject of key
choices, leaders vitally affect Money investor relations. As per the senior echelon
hypothesis, the Individual Capital Design Hypothesis qualities of CEOs, for example,
orientation, mature, Abroad Social foundation, profession foundation, political
relationship, and so on, can impact their mental examples and values, which thus can
impact their choices on corporate procedure (Hambrick and Artisan, 1984). More,
Chen Dongjie (2018), brings up that Abroad Social foundation is one of the regular
Individual Capital Design Hypothesis qualities of leaders, with Abroad Conduct
foundation by unfamiliar high level Money investor relations framework and
straightforward corporate culture, have more grounded mental premise of Money
investor relations, and has a more grounded Money investor relations the management
insight, when they returned as homegrown CEOs, will contact the Money investor
relations information, experience applied to the administration choices of
neighborhood organizations. Braguinsky And Mityakov (2015) likewise brought up
that for developing business sectors, the germination of Money investor relations
exercises from unfamiliar high level Money investor relations framework climate to
the homegrown dispersion, with Abroad Social foundation, will bring more grounded
Money investor security cognizance and further developed Money investor relations
the management insight, advance the fast improvement of the relationship in
developing business sectors and Money investors. CEO at the highest point of the
organization the executives structure, is the genuine CEOs of activity the
management, and, contrasted and the created nations, the customary centralization,
progressive culture, the CEO in the organization choice more grounded (Wei and
Ling, 2015), it tends to be construed that CEO Abroad Social foundation will
essentially affect the organization's Money investor relations choices.
In light of the above examination, this paper looks at whether the CEO emphatically
affects the Abroad Social foundation of the organization's Money investor relations. In
particular, this paper depends on the highest level hypothesis, Engraving Hypothesis,
the executives power hypothesis, with each of the a-share non-monetary recorded
organizations in 2009-2018 CEO Abroad Social foundation information, Money
investor relations information and monetary information as tests, lay out different
direct relapse model, experimental test CEO Abroad Conduct foundation effect on
corporate Money investor relations.
1.2 Study significance

Recorded organizations in created nations have commonly set up full-time divisions

or faculty of Money investor relations, and Money investor relations have been
exceptionally esteemed by recorded organizations. In our nation, nonetheless, the
investigation of Money investor relations began late, the hypothesis of Money
investor relations, has not yet framed a brought together hypothetical framework, and
the exact likewise very need, Money investor relations of recorded organizations is
still in the beginning phase of improvement, its Greater improvement direly needs
more hypothetical outcomes and experimental outcomes. Subsequently, this paper
utilizes the numerous direct relapse model to investigate the impact of the CEO
foundation attributes on the Money investor relationship, and checks the connection
between the two, which has solid hypothetical worth and down to earth importance.

1.2.1 Theoretical Significance

First, it provides a new research perspective for studying the influencing factors of
Finance investor relations. Eng and Mak (2003) called attention to that Money
investor relations have turned into a basic piece of corporate administration and are
firmly connected with other corporate administration components. In the moderately
experienced and created unfamiliar capital market, Money investor relations have
turned into the focal point of hypothetical research study and useful utilization of
numerous researchers. With the continuous increment of the size of recorded
organizations and the rising number of investors, Money investor relations have
become progressively convoluted, making it the center examination subject of
corporate administration. Ebb and flow research on the impacting variables of Money
investor relations, generally from the organization qualities, corporate administration,
the point of view of value structure, hardly any writing examines the impact of
ranking directors on Money investor relations, this paper according to the point of
view of CEO abroad Hypothetical premise, can More enhance the examination
aftereffects of the affecting elements of Money investor relations. Furthermore, to
More improve and extend the CEO echelon hypothesis. In the flow research on the
CEO echelon hypothesis, the directors' orientation, age, instructive foundation and
work insight. In any case, the Abroad Social foundation of directors has drawn in
broad consideration of researchers as of late. Through sorting out the Overseas
Behavioral background literature of managers, it is found that most of the influences
of Overseas Behavioral background on the company's decision-making, operation and
performance, innovation and research and development, investment efficiency, and
internationalization process are discussed, rarely involving Overseas Behavioral
background and Finance investor relations. This paper empirically tests the influence
of CEO's Overseas Behavioral background on Finance investor relations, which can
enrich the research results of CEO echelon theory, and supplement new evidence for
the research of managers' Overseas Behavioral background characteristics.

1.2.2 Practical significance

To start with, it gives a Meaning of significant ideas for reinforcing Money investor
security in China's capital market. The opening up of China's capital market has been
progressively sped up, the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Interface and Shenzhen-Hong
Kong Stock Associate have been advanced without a hitch, and the Shanghai-London
Stock Associate has likewise been sent off. Abroad capital has been entering, and the
quantity of abroad institutional Money investors has been expanding, which advances
higher necessities for the assurance component of Money investors' privileges and
interests in China's capital market. As a communication tool, Finance investor
relations can realize effective communication with Finance investors, which is a key
mechanism for the protection of Finance investors 'rights and interests. It can build
Money financial's comprehension backers might interpret the organization, diminish
data deviation and decrease the office cost. Reinforcing the investigation of Money
investor relations is helpful for working on the act of safeguarding partners in China's
capital market.
Second, to give pragmatic approaches to recorded organizations to further develop
Money investor relations. Finance investor relations is a significant key exercises of
recorded organizations, great correspondence and cooperation with Money investors
can assist with companying procedure execution, upgrade the seriousness of the
recorded organization in the capital market, embrace Money investors defense
proposition can likewise further develop organization the executives, work fair and
square of corporate administration, lay out a decent corporate picture, reinforce
Money investors acknowledgment of the organization, improve organization funding
capacity, further develop the organization esteem, Money investor relations has turned
into a significant apparatus of recorded organizations to rival one another. Through
the study of this paper, emphasizes the importance of managers personal background
characteristics, for Chinese listed companies to enhance Finance investor relations
management provides a practical method: listed companies can hire with Overseas
Behavioral background CEO, rely on the returnees CEO stronger cognitive basis of
Finance investor relations and more rich management experience, improve corporate
Finance investor relations.

1.3 Study content and methods

1.3.1 Research content

This paper mainly studies the CEO of Overseas Behavioral background on Finance
investor relations, on the basis of the relevant theory and literature review, put
forward the research hypothesis of this paper, and select all a-share non-financial
listed companies in 2009-2018 panel data for samples, through multiple linear
regression to hypothesis test, specifically, this paper is divided into the following
parts: the first is divided into the preface. This segment fundamentally presents the
research study foundation, research importance, research content and techniques for
the effect of CEO Abroad Conduct foundation on Money investor relationship, and
makes sense of the development of this paper. The subsequent part is for the writing
Corporate Value. This segment initially presents the senior echelon hypothesis,
Engraving Hypothesis and the management power hypothesis connected with the
examination of this paper, then, at that point, surveys the research study results
connected with the CEO foundation and Money investor relations, lastly Corporate
Values the writing. The third part is the hypothetical examination and the research
study speculation. Based on a full comprehension of significant writing speculations,
this part alludes to the current research study and advances the examination theory of
this paper: the CEO's Abroad Social foundation will further develop the Money
investor relations of ventures. The fourth part is separated into the research study
Suspicions and Model Plan. In light of the past examination speculations, we will
choose and characterize The logical Model (2) Factors, made sense of factors and
control factors, develop the experimental examination model, and make sense of the
information source and test handling process. The fifth part is the observational
outcomes and examination of the effect of CEO's Abroad Social foundation on
corporate Money investor relations. In this part, enlightening measurements and
relationship examination were directed on the factors in this paper, and afterward as
per the past research study model, numerous straight relapse was utilized to test the
speculation proposed above, and make sense of and break down the important
experimental outcomes. On this premise, this paper likewise More dissects the impact
of various sorts of Abroad Conduct foundation on the Money investor relations, and
the CEO administration independence, organization straightforwardness of the CEO
Abroad Social foundation impact Money investor relations, at last, to keep away from
inclination brought about by endogenous, this paper join the device variable, utilizing
two phases of least squares More relapse, additionally changed the Money investor
relations intermediary factors, supplant control factors again relapse, to guarantee the
end is more hearty. The 6th part is separated into ends, suggestions, and limits.
Through a series of regression results mentioned above, we draw the research
conclusions of this paper, put forward policy suggestions, and point out the limitations
of this paper. The research idea diagram of this paper is shown in Figure 1-1.

Figure 1-1:, Research idea diagram

1.3.2 Research methods

As indicated by the examination content of this paper, the research study strategies took on are as
per the following.

1. Writing enlistment technique

Via cautiously perusing an enormous number of writing, coordinate the important Meaning of

significant ideas, the Money investor relations and CEO foundation writing and enlistment, sum

up the current writing, comprehend the flow research circumstance and the issue of Money

investor relations, investigation of directors Abroad Social foundation and other Individual Capital

Design Hypothesis qualities of the impact of big business key choice, starter development of

Chinese recorded organization CEO Abroad Conduct foundation and Money investor relations of

exact examination framework, trust that through hypothesis to direct practice, get logical,

thorough research study results.

2. factual investigation technique

Subsequent to building the CEO Abroad Conduct foundation and Money investor relations after

exact investigation framework, joined with various means, through different ways of gathering the

first information and information, and utilize spellbinding measurements, connection examination,

management information relapse investigation and other factual techniques for information

examination, get the research study results. On this premise, the vigor test is then directed by the

instrumental variable relapse investigation to guarantee the dependability of the relapse results.

3. Subjective investigation technique is joined with the quantitative examination strategy

In the investigation of this paper, joining subjective examination and quantitative investigation

technique, this paper embraces the writing examination of the subjective investigation strategy for

the Money investor relations of recorded organizations and CEOs to pass judgment on the

connection between the two, under the reason of subjective investigation, quantitative

investigation by utilizing measurable relapse, fabricate comparing factual model investigation

information, research end, the consequences of subjective examination of explicit test, make the

subjective investigation more logical and precise.

1.4 Research and innovation

In light of past examinations, this paper exactly tests the effect of the Abroad Social foundation of

CEOs of Chinese recorded organizations on Money investor relations. The potential developments
of this paper are as per the following:

(1) Money investor relations has turned into the focal point of corporate administration, the

research study on the variables of Money investor relations, for the most part according to the

viewpoint of corporate qualities, corporate administration, value structure, barely any writing

examines the impact of ranking directors on Money investor relations, this paper depends on the

viewpoint of highest level hypothesis, the CEO Abroad Conduct foundation because of Money

investor relations, for the impact of leaders on Money investor relations.

(2) Abroad Social foundation is one of the significant Individual Capital Design Hypothesis

attributes of CEOs, existing research study, just Chen Dongjie (2018) concentrated on CEO

Abroad Conduct foundation and the association between Money investor relationship, however

interestingly, the examination of alternate point of view, this paper depends on highest level

hypothesis, Engraving Hypothesis, from Abroad Conduct foundation of mental brand and

capacity, itemized investigation of the CEO Abroad Social foundation impact instrument of

Money investor relations.

(3) This paper completely breaks down the impact of various CEO Abroad Social foundation on

the Money investor relations, in the observational part, the CEO Abroad Conduct foundation into

abroad growth opportunity and abroad work insight, investigate the various kinds of CEO Abroad

Social foundation because of Money investor relations, to extend the comprehension of Abroad

Conduct foundation type heterogeneity, separated ability presentation strategy, to more readily

advance the improvement of Money investor relations in China.

(4) This paper More inspects the CEO Abroad Social foundation to work on the interior

instrument of Money investor relations, from the CEO administration independence,

straightforwardness, enhance the leaders Abroad Conduct foundation assume the part of brand

factors, found that main the CEO face more modest limitations and imperatives, the organization

straightforwardness is low, Abroad Conduct foundation to the CEO "mental brand" and "brand"

capacity " to work, influence the organization Money investor relations choice.
 2. Related concepts and theoretical foundations

2.1 Definition of relevant concepts

2.1.1 CEO echelon theory

Since Adam Smith put forward the hypothesis of "economic man", "economic rationality" has

become the mainstream of corporate governance theory. It is addressed by the head researcher

hypothesis, and accepts that supervisors are totally normal and settle on the corporate key choice

fully intent on seeking after the boost of monetary utility. The customary standard group accept

that CEOs go with key choices by the organization confronting the financial climate, like the

organization's business seriousness, modern construction qualities, evaluating system, like outer

circumstances, and directors as homogeneous, totally levelheaded researcher, the impact of not

choices, they are viewed as the equivalent thinking skill and dynamic inclination, settle on any

essential choice depends on the organization at the hour of the economy, can pick the ideal design.

Yet, with the extending of the examination, an ever increasing number of researchers observed that

corporate vital choice is a complicated program, during the time spent key direction, directors face

numerous forthcoming complex data, can't to all parts of discernment, frequently not complete and

unbiasedly handle the data, likewise can't answer ecological changes whenever, the outcome can't

get a handle on the worldwide dynamic deviation. In this way, directors don't have the

circumstances to turn out to be completely levelheaded merchants, they are possibly restricted

reasonable researchers while settling on essential choices of the organization.

In light of the above foundation, Hambrick and Artisan (1984) officially proposed the CEO

echelon hypothesis (Higher classes Hypothesis). This hypothesis concentrates because of

supervisors' Very own Capital Construction Hypothesis attributes on their mental premise, and

applies this relationship to the models of corporate key direction, authoritative design, and

corporate execution. The hypothesis that the organization's essential choice is really directors

notwithstanding a particular association circumstance of sifting process, since they are restricted
levelheaded entertainer, existing mental design and values decide they can see in the circumstance

and data translation and handling, ultimately structure the mental and social choices.

Witteloostuijn and Boone (2006) More make sense of what the administrators' insight means for

the course of their conduct choice: First, the current mental premise restricts the regions,

consideration, vision and aversion to the climate. Then, the CEOs produce "particular insight",

focus on the data inside their delicate reach, lastly, the administrators pursue conduct choices in

view of the data handled by mental "separating". Among them, the CEOs mental premise

including mental examples, values, mental qualities and perceivability experience, Individual

Capital Design Hypothesis qualities is a sort of perceivability experience, this component is firmly

connected with the mental qualities of directors, the mental qualities is challenging to notice and

get, Individual Capital Construction Hypothesis qualities into the intermediary variable of mental

attributes, is viewed as supervisors portrayal of mental cognizance and direction.

According to the point of view of senior echelon hypothesis, CEOs are not totally levelheaded in

that frame of mind in the real organization the management cycle. Every one of their decisions are

affected by different complex conditions, yet in addition confined by their Own Capital Design

Hypothesis attributes. Overseas Behavioral background as one of the CEO Personal Capital

Structure Theory characteristics, will make the returnees CEO form with local CEO different

cognitive basis, for different information "selective perception", and sensitive to the scope of

information to attention and corresponding explanation, in the end, the CEO according to the

cognitive "filtering" processing information to make behavioral decisions.

Figure 2-1 Theoretical schematic diagram of the CEO echelon

2.1.2 Imprinting theory

Imprinting Theory (Imprinting Theory) first put forward by biologists,the hypothesis depicts the

natural subject in a particular climate, will encounter a "climate delicate" period, during this

period, the primary body will shape adjusted to the ecological qualities of "brand", these "brand"

attributes with dormancy, regardless of whether the outside climate changes, likewise will have

constant impact on center subject (Marquis and Tilcsik, 2013). The central issues of marking

system are: ① experience delicate period; ② development brand adjusted to the climate; and ③

constant impact. Then, at that point, Engraving Hypothesis is applied to the investigation of the

executives, used to make sense of in the improvement cycle of the association, impacted by the

previous history, will shape and establish the climate of "brand", the "brand" qualities can battle

the outer climate change, after the advancement phase of association actually have enduring effect

on the association (Greenwood, and so on, 2010). This examination result opened a novel thought

for the research study of the management science. Researchers were enlivened to do investigate

according to the point of view of Engraving Hypothesis, and framed rich research study results. At

first, researchers applied marking hypothesis to hierarchical hypothesis and authoritative

environment, accepting ventures as the research study article, and zeroing in on how the ensuing

effect of "brand" and "brand" on endeavors (Mathias et al., 2015). Afterward, with the extending

of research study, researchers started to zero in on Engraving Hypothesis from endeavors to

people, with individual business visionaries as the examination object, zeroing in on how the

"brand" shaped by early encounters lastingly affects the resulting profession of administrators

(Azoulay et al., 2017). In view of the hypothesis, the CEO to abroad, by the abroad friendly

culture, monetary climate, the overall set of laws, will encounter a "delicate" climate, the first

mental design and values tested, to reduce the tension of the new climate, CEO mental idea,

dynamic reasoning and inclinations will create massive changes, bit by bit with new climate,

framed with the abroad climate "brand" qualities. Even after they return to China, this "brand" of

overseas experience continues, affecting the management of the company through the inertial
decision-making mode (Dokko et al., 2009).

Through brushing, the highest level hypothesis proposes that Abroad Social foundation, as one of

the Individual Capital Construction Hypothesis qualities of the CEO, will influence its mental

premise, and afterward influence the organization choice; Engraving Hypothesis, because of the

conspicuous framework and culture contrasts between nations, it is clearly a "delicate period",

during this touchy period, the CEO will encounter the most common way of being "marked",

which is viable with the abroad climate, and impact organization choice (Du Yong et al., 2018). By

examination, it very well may be observed that the Engraving Hypothesis is really the epitome of

the senior echelon hypothesis, which centers around the impact of the previous experience of the

CEOs on its mental premise. The thing that matters is that the CEO echelon hypothesis mirrors a

last static outcome, while the Engraving Hypothesis stresses the dynamic "marking" process.

Through this cycle, what the component of CEOs' previous experience means for their mental

premise and the instrument of activity is investigated (Du Yong et al., 2019).

2.1.3 Power theory of management

The CEO, in particular the CEO Boss (CEO Top dog), is the most noteworthy CEO leader

accountable for the everyday activity the executives of the organization. The CEO started in the

US and is the result of the partition of the management and ownership under the corporate

framework. In the customary corporate administration structure, the governing body is liable for

the organization navigation, senior supervisor is answerable for dynamic execution, yet with the

improvement of monetary globalization, worldwide organizations business advancement, outside

financial circumstance changes quickly, the partition of direction and leader data slack, block the

CEOs of the organization's significant choices quick, exact execution. In this specific situation, a

few organizations break the conventional administration design of the directorate senior

supervisor, set up simultaneously and the CEO of the CEO, the first piece of the management

choice exchange to the CEO, CEO become venture activity the executives genuine leaders, the

elements of the governing body to give need to with determination, assessment administrators

(Dalton and Kesner, 1985).

In the conventional head researcher hypothesis, the governing body has the outright ability to
settle on corporate choices. The hypothesis that in the two rights partition of current corporate

undertakings, investors and CEO (CEOs) has a place with the head researcher relationship, in this

legally binding relationship, the CEO ought to boost the guideline of investor intrigues choice, yet

determined by the inspiration, CEO will generally seek after private utility expansion, for instance,

to reinforce their power and grow the organization size, exorbitant hands on utilization, and so on,

bringing about the head researcher issue. To reduce the researcher issue, investors can through the

leading body of the CEO, the governing body to the arrangement and evacuation of the CEO and

oversight, conclude the CEO compensation, the CEO just inside the extent of the leading group of

approval, hence, the CEO interests and investor interests will generally be steady, the CEO for

their own advantages, harm investors can be actually smothered (Jensen and Meckling, 1976).

Afterward, the administration power hypothesis (Administrative Power Approach) group set

forward various perspectives, accepting that the governing body will most likely be unable to

frame compelling management and limitation on the CEO. The CEO can "catch" the top

managerial staff through the power in his grasp, and impact the choice of the CEOs, with the goal

that the directorate can turn into a "embellishment". Finkelstein (1992) brings up that the principal

obligation of the management is to manage vulnerabilities from inside and outside the

organization, which normally causes the centralization of organization capacity to the CEO.

Likewise, in the genuine organization undertakings, in light of data deviation, the management

individuals ride, value structure is too dispersed, two solidarity, the management to the CEO have

compelling imperatives, can't actually take care of the issue of researcher, at the highest point of

the administration construction of the CEO frequently has the outright power over the top

managerial staff. Bebchuk and Broiled (2003) that's what more expressed, The justifications for

why the load up can't successfully control the CEO are: ① Load up individuals are typically

named by CEOs, The appointment of CEOs might be manipulated by the CEO; ② Albeit the

governing body can designate or eliminate the CEO, However the power isn't by and large

practiced effectively, The explanation is that leader change flags that the organization is

struggling, simultaneously, it is challenging to questionnaire down a more reasonable CEO in a

brief time frame; ③ Organization the executives content is complicated, CEOs frequently have

more grounded administration experience and expert abilities, And the load up, Get more drive in
corporate direction. In view of this hypothesis, the more impressive the CEO is, the more

"hostage" the management is. Whenever the organization is profoundly brought together, the CEO

is at the most noteworthy place of the organization's power, has the dynamic power and inner data

of the organization's activity and the executives, and his own inclinations will impact the

significant key choices of the organization (Haynes and Hillman, 2010).

2.2 Theoretical basis results of CEOs

As indicated by the highest level hypothesis, the CEO's Abroad Conduct foundation is one of the

ordinary Individual Capital Design Hypothesis qualities of CEOs. It is the "reflect" hidden the

cognizance of ranking directors. It is firmly connected with their aversion to the climate and the

understanding of data, and at last figures out what choices they will take. Hence, this segment will

initially present the Individual Capital Design Hypothesis qualities of CEOs, and afterward

Corporate Value the pertinent writing of their Abroad Social foundation exhaustively.

2.2.1 Personal Capital Structure Theory characteristics of CEOs

Hambrick And Finkelstein (1987), in view of the highest level hypothesis, said that when the more

prominent the caution of administrators in direction, the more noteworthy the impact of their Own

Capital Construction Hypothesis attributes on the organization's way of behaving. The Individual

Capital Design Hypothesis qualities of CEOs include: first, normal ascribes. That is, the normal

organic attributes supplied to people, like orientation, age, level, weight, and so on, are steady and

won't be quickly different. Second, social ascribes. In other words, the properties framed by a

specific territorial economy because of the different social relations of people frequently change,

including the director's expert foundation, instructive foundation, political affiliation, scholarly

experience, term length, misfortune experience and different qualities.

1. Normal property qualities of CEOs

As far as orientation, Lam et al. (2013) noticed that female CEOs for the most part require lower

pay than male CEOs, and that there is a critical connection between's CEO orientation and

company execution. Carter et al. (2017) shows that the hazard avoidance of female CEOs is higher
than that of men, and they will generally be more gamble aversion. As far as the compensation

motivating force method of undertakings, they are more disposed to pick the blend of high extent

of fixed compensation with low extent of value compensation. Thomas et al. (2012) called

attention to that the orientation variety of the individuals in the senior supervisory crew can

fundamentally work on the corporate execution. Zeng Sanyun et al. (2015), Yao Zhenhua and Sun

Haifa (2011) additionally observed that the orientation of the CEO was altogether connected with

the organization's money holding level and the recurrence of group correspondence.

Regarding age, Bertrand and Schoar (2003) showed that there are massive contrasts in supervisor

dynamic styles among various ages, with more seasoned CEOs generally moderate, while more

youthful CEOs favoring more forceful speculation ways of behaving from the get-go in their

professions to earn respect and amassing notoriety. Serfling (2014) likewise noticed that more

seasoned CEOs will generally have safer speculation strategies to lessen the organization's

gamble, explicitly diminishing R and D venture, making acquisitions in an enhanced way,

diversithe organization's administration and tasks, and keeping up with low working influence.

Tanikawa And Jung (2016) found that the period of CEOs adversely affects their assurance and

reaction speed, and more seasoned leaders will generally stay away from hazard and make the

organization botch outer open doors; youthful CEOs are more imaginative, have progressed

thoughts, can stay up with The Times, immediately ace new information, and handle the

organization potential open doors. Chinese researchers Zhong Haiyan and Zhang Meng (2014)

have reached comparative resolutions.

2. Social trait qualities of CEOs

According to the viewpoint of expert foundation, Malmendier and Tate (2005) brought up that

CEOs who have concentrated on in finance or have worked in finance before are more moderate

in pursuing corporate venture choices and are less delicate to income from corporate speculation.

Yang and Wang (2014) took the recorded organizations on China's little and medium management

as an example, and found that the expert experience of CEOs would influence the essential

situating choice of ventures, in this manner influencing the presentation of organizations.

Regarding schooling, Bertrand and Schoar (2003) showed that CEOs with a MBA are bound to

show carelessness in corporate decision-production for more forceful corporate way of behaving.
Smith and Tushman (2005) exactly found that the training level decides the data source and

considering cognizance administrators. When confronted with the functional issues of the

organization, the more instructed CEOs will have more data sources and more different

arrangements, which can fundamentally work on the nature of authoritative direction and work on

the presentation of the endeavor.

According to the viewpoint of political connection, Fisman (2001) research shows that the

political relationship of CEO is an asset for endeavors, which can essentially decrease the

supporting expense and lessen the duty pace of organizations, and is more clear in immature

nations with serious unofficial law. Fan et al. (2007) took the information of China's A-share

recorded organizations as An example, however found that CEOs with political pertinence

adversely affected the organization's activity. The explanation might be that administration

intercession causes these undertakings to take on additional social obligations and assist the public

authority with practicing social capabilities. Wen-feng wu (2008) based on the confidential

recorded organizations, and the CEO and director, experimental found that the top administration

foundation of nearby government foundation to work on the worth of the organization more self-

evident, and senior administration neighborhood government foundation will improve the

organization's advance accommodation.

According to the viewpoint of scholarly experience, Francis et al. (2015) brought up that

supervisors with scholarly experience have more thorough preparation, rationale and conduct, and

will quite often utilize proficient information to handle data and settle on corporate choices. Cho et

al. (2017) experimentally shows that CEOs who have worked in a college have higher moral

principles and a more grounded feeling of social obligation, and their scholarly foundation is

essentially decidedly related with the organization's social obligation execution rating. Zhou

Kaitang et al. (2017) brought up that the scholastic experience of CEOs can decrease the

administrations level of the income of endeavors, diminish the data hazard of undertakings, work

fair and square of bookkeeping strength, and make it simpler for ventures to acquire advances

from banks and lessen the supporting expenses of undertakings.

According to the viewpoint of CEO residency, Bain (2015) experimentally found that the

residency of ranking directors can altogether further develop their administration level, The more
extended the term of office, the more grounded the administration capacity. Zhang Ping (2006)

shows that the higher the residency heterogeneity between individuals in the senior supervisory

crew, the more probable the distinctions of sentiments in the organization's essential choices,

which will ultimately adversely affect the organization's exhibition. Li Weining and Li (2015)

additionally questionnaireed down that the more prominent the residency distinction between

CEO individuals, the more clear the adverse consequence on the organization's methodology,

however no huge effect on the organization's presentation. According to the viewpoint of

misfortune experience, Bernile et al. (2017) shows that the early affliction experience of the CEO

will change the reasoning mode and upsides of the later days, and influence their singular ways of

behaving in adulthood. In particular, CEOs who have encountered lethal cataclysmic events and

seen serious outcomes are more moderate in settling on venture choices, more wary in utilizing

influence, holding money and acquisitions, and CEOs who have not experienced serious

calamities are more forceful and dangerous. Xu years line and li zhe (2016) brought up that the

individual early injury will keep on influencing their psyche and conduct, More exact shows that

adolescence was brought into the world in unfortunate regions or experienced "starvation" CEO,

hands on utilization CEO lower than conceived rich regions, and the CEO spot undertaking more

friendly obligation, will be more altruistic gifts.

2.2.2 Overseas Behavioral background of CEOs

In light of highest level hypothesis and Engraving Hypothesis, Abroad Social foundation as a

unique encounter, CEOs will shape adjusted to the abroad climate "brand", influence its mental

idea, the "brand" qualities after directors will keep on influencing its conduct choice, numerous

researchers research demonstrated that supervisors Abroad Social foundation can essentially

influence the organization's administration (melody Lin and zhang, 2019). With regards to

organization execution, Suutari and Makela (2007) brought up that the Abroad Social foundation

influences CEOs to various societies, has a more significant level of information and expert

abilities, is great at reflection, and is more worried about the drawn out improvement of the

organization while deciding, which can work on the drawn out execution of the organization. Day
to day et al. (2000) Taking the worldwide top 500 endeavors as tests, the observational outcomes

demonstrate the way that the CEO's Abroad Social foundation can decidedly affect the

organization's monetary exhibition. Essentially, Woodworker and Fredrickson (2001) found that

employing CEOs with Abroad Social foundations upgraded the presentation of global

organizations. Wang Xueli et al. (2013) utilized a-share data innovation industry information to

illustrate, and found that employing CEOs with Abroad Conduct foundation can fundamentally

improve the present moment and long haul execution of the organization.

For the organization's research study and development, Yuan and Wen (2018) accept that the

Abroad Social foundation empowers CEOs to dominate progressed science and innovation, which

will upgrade the advancement of the undertaking and advance the improvement of the venture,

and the high level administration experience they bring will help the entire business through the

type of information overflow. Luo Siping and Yu Yongda (2012) took the information of recorded

organizations in China's photovoltaic industry as an example, and experimentally found that

directors with Abroad Social foundation have a more grounded consciousness of patent security,

higher mechanical development capacity, and will bring innovation overflow impact. Yang Lin et

al. (2018) took 275 Pearl recorded organizations in China as tests, and found that the Abroad

Social foundation of CEOs impacted the organization's advancement execution by expanding the

organization's R and D venture power. Liu Fengchao et al. (2017) More brought up that the higher

the extent of faculty with Abroad Conduct foundation in the senior supervisory group, the more

the quantity of patent utilizations of the organization.

For the internationalization cycle of the organization, Woodworker and Fredrickson (2001)

observed that the CEO Abroad Social foundation is a significant consider the organization's

internationalization choice. The CEO abroad experience can help the organization rapidly get in

good shape in a new and unsure climate, and the Abroad Social foundation of the CEO is

essentially decidedly related with the global broadening of the organization. Ge Yuhui and Shin

(2011) called attention to that the Abroad Conduct foundation of CEOs can build their

involvement with taking care of the organization's foreign relations, bring them progressed

abilities, the executives experience and direct data in the worldwide market, and assist the

organization with bettering survey market amazing open doors and expected dangers. Giannetti et
al. (2015) Taking the information of recorded organizations in China's A-share market as tests, the

investigation discovered that the extent of staff with Abroad Social foundation in the directorate is

essentially related with the benefit of the organization and the organization esteem. Besides, the

abroad CEOs can altogether advance the internationalization cycle of the organization, and the

organization has more cross-line consolidations and acquisitions and cross-line funding.

For organization venture, Zhang charming (2015) to a-share recorded organizations in China in

2003-2013 information as the example, questionnaireed down supervisors Abroad Conduct

foundation and the organization's unfamiliar direct speculation, and contrasted and the

administration doesn't have Abroad Social foundation, with abroad CEOs organization unfamiliar

speculation execution is better, More, gathering relapse results show that abroad work foundation

than abroad learning foundation of venture execution advancement impact is more huge. Dai

Yunhao and Kong Dongmin (2017) analyzed the connection between the Abroad Social

foundation and venture proficiency of ranking directors. The observational outcomes

demonstrated the way that the Abroad Social foundation of CEOs can altogether further develop

the venture proficiency of the organization. Contrasted and neighborhood state-claimed endeavors

and different sorts of ventures, it assumes a more huge part in advancing the speculation

effectiveness of focal undertakings.

Concerning Money investor security and social obligation, Conyon et al. (2019) brought up that

the Abroad Conduct foundation empowers CEOs to have a more grounded feeling of Money

investor security and can more readily shield the genuine freedoms and interests of Money

investors. Zhang (2018) information of recorded organizations as tests, the investigation

discovered that CEOs Abroad Conduct foundation through the method of oversight and guidance

administrators, can essentially work on the social obligation of recorded organizations to take part

in, and More calls attention to that when the organization for non-state-claimed ventures or CEO

more seasoned, Abroad Social foundation and corporate social obligation to take part in the

positive relationship is more critical. Wen and Tune Jianbo (2017) found that western created

nations generally have an experienced social obligation schooling system and join significance to

the development of understudies' business morals. CEOs with Abroad Conduct foundation have

been penetrated by such high upright norms for quite a while and will have a more grounded
social obligation than neighborhood directors. Consequently, among the senior supervisory group

of the organization, the more staff with Abroad Conduct foundation, the more grounded the

awareness of certain expectations, the more disposed to satisfy social obligation, and the higher

the public score of the organization.

For organization risk taking, Melody Jianbo (2017) observational outcomes demonstrate the way

that senior administration Abroad Conduct foundation can fundamentally upgrade the

organization's gamble taking level, and leader group with Abroad Social foundation the higher the

extent, the organization risk bearing capacity, however Seriously gathering test results show that

when and just when the returnees have home for the more evolved economy, Money investor

security cognizance more grounded nations, Abroad Conduct foundation can essentially influence

the organization risk taking level.

For the compensation hole of the organization, Liu Guangqiang and Kong Gaowen (2018)

contemplated according to the viewpoint of social struggle, and observed that the abroad

experience of the administrator or the head supervisor was fundamentally associated with the

compensation hole. At the point when the Abroad Social foundation comes from the high

independence culture, the improvement of the compensation hole is more huge; additionally, the

compensation strategy formed by the administrator or the head supervisor meaningfully affects

representatives, which will fundamentally decrease the exhibition of the organization and restrain

the development capacity of the venture. Xiang Huiling (2019) accepts that the governing body is

the fundamental body of the organization's remuneration, thusly, utilizing comparable strategies to

analyze the effect of autonomous CEOs' Abroad Conduct foundation on the organization's

compensation hole. The outcomes show that the two are fundamentally decidedly related, and

when the organization is a state-claimed venture, the connection between's the two is more

grounded.
2.3 Finance investor relations research results

2.3.1 Definition and measurement methods of Finance investor

relations

1. Definition of Finance investor relations

Finance investor relations (IR-Money investor Relations) alludes to the drawn out connection

between recorded organizations and Money investors, this relationship is a wide idea, not just with

the organization stock existing Money investors and potential Money investors, likewise

incorporates with the remainder of the capital market members, like go-betweens, store CEOs,

investigators (Preiholt, 2004). In spite of the fact that from the mark of grammatical form, Money

investor relations is a thing, however through the writing found that in the concentrate at home

and abroad, the idea frequently incorporates the relationship of an arranged and long haul the

executives, so a few researchers during the time spent research study will likewise utilize "Money

investor relations the management" (IRM-Money investor Relations The management), the two

words generally confounded, there is no fundamental distinction (Yang Deming and spring, 2006).

The Public Money investors Affiliation (NIRI) 2 characterized Money investor relations the

management in 2001 as: " to understand the honest evaluation of protections and diminish the

gamble of Money investor holding, the organization utilizes finance, monetary administration,

correspondence, showcasing and other mastery to uncover the activity and improvement of the

organization to the current and potential Money investors."The affiliation accepts that Money

investor relationship is a by and large essential market movement that consolidates the two

elements of organization money and correspondence. Through such exercises, it can give Money

investors right data on the organization's administration and improvement, and guarantee that

Money investors can have adequate data while settling on speculation choices and decrease

venture costs. In China, in the Rules 3 gave by the CSRC in 2005, the meaning of Money investor

relations is given as: "to work on corporate administration, recorded organizations reinforce

correspondence with Money investors through data divulgence and trade, decrease data
unevenness, and upgrade how they might interpret the organization". Subsequently, Money

investor relations exercises should be visible as focused on and exact data delivery to improve

Money investors' comprehension and acknowledgment of the organization and settle the stock

value (Marston, 1996). Its fundamental work incorporates data revelation, correspondence and

collaboration with Money investors, emergency advertising, examination and research study of

Money investors, and support in the definition of the organization's improvement system (Yang

Deming and Xin Qingquan, 2006). According to the point of view of organization hypothesis, the

fundamental explanation of Money investor relationship is the common interest between recorded

organizations and Money investors.one side, Money investors to harvest significant yields from

recorded organizations, Put Money in corporate protections, in any case, There is extraordinary

vulnerability about this increases, To lessen the gamble, Money investors will intently screen

corporate monetary and non-monetary data, Focus on the organization's business execution and

improvement pattern; then again, The organization's day to day activity and scale improvement

should back to the capital market, Let Money investors face some challenge, Need to upgrade

corporate credit, Get long haul Money investor help, thusly, Recorded organizations endeavor to

meet Money investors' data revelation assumptions, because of Money investor worries,

Endeavors to resolve the issues confronting Money investors, Working on corporate

administration, Send a "signal" of high straightforwardness in the organization to Fund investors

(Mama Lianfu and Zhao Ying, 2006).

2. The way that the Finance investor relations are measured

The idea of Money investor relations is more hard to straightforwardly portray and gauge it, as of

now, the scholastic local area has not yet framed a bound together perceived estimation record

(Chen Dongjie, 2018), While assessing the Money investor relations of recorded organizations,

There are in many cases enormous contrasts between the assessment subject and the substance of

consideration (Li Xindan et al., 2006), In the unfamiliar created capital business sectors, Have an

expert Money investor relations assessment office, For example, NIRI 4, Reuters, IR Magazine,

To build the Money investor relations assessment file by utilizing poll study information and

company IR site data, These expert establishments are more definitive, The distributed IR record

has areas of strength for a (Muggy, 2003). In any case, in China, there are not many examinations
on Money investor relations. In the current writing, the accompanying pointers fundamentally

measure Money investor relations:

In the first place, utilize the poll review or the got to information to construct the Money investor

relations record. Chinese researcher Li Xindan et al. (2006) allude to unfamiliar examinations,

Along With Nanjing College and the China Protections Administrative Commission, Information

were gotten by utilizing a poll review, Taking the 2004 yearly information of 563 A-share

recorded organizations as An example, A few markers, including the nature of correspondence

relationship, data revelation quality, and the level of CEO cooperation in IRM, Contains the

assessment of the corporate Money investor relations the management cycle and the executives

results, Give the pointers various loads, Framed the Nanjing College Money investor Relations

The executives File (CIRINJU), The research study of Xiao Binqing et al. (2007) follows the

CIRINJU file to gauge corporate Money investor relations. Likewise, Zhao Ying (2009) utilized

the master quality assessment technique to choose 42 Money investor relationship assessment

markers, and built the Money investor relations file by getting to and unveiling data information.

Nonetheless, this file development technique has two impediments: first, the poll review strategy

or access is troublesome, and the quantity of tests acquired is restricted; second, the setting of

certain markers in the survey major areas of strength for has. 5. There is estimation mistake, which

creates endogenous issues and prompts relapse as one-sided assessment.

Second, utilize the organization's site to reveal data to fabricate the Money investor relations file.

Lin Receptacle (2005), Yang Deming and Xin Qingquan (2006) to beat the estimation blunder

brought about by the previously mentioned poll study and interview, While developing the IR

record, The chose markers chose are all from the organization site, These measurements

incorporate normal and trade data revealed on the organization's site, Utilizing the 0-1 scoring

models, 1 moment that it exists on the organization's site, Doesn't exist to give 0 focuses, The all

out scores are the organization's Money investor Relations File (IIRI), This approach guarantees

the objectivity of the information somewhat, Yet very much like Li Xin-dan (2006), In light of the

fact that the development pointers are for the most part 0-1 factors, Consequently, they just utilize

the information of a specific year, Mirroring the successions in corporate Money investor relations

over the course of the years is troublesome.

Third, utilize a solitary marker intermediary variable. Construct the IR file way albeit logical and

extensive, yet restricted by the capital market improvement, no expert Money investor relations

assessment establishments, absence of dynamic following report of the organization throughout

the long term, in this way, for the investigation of the organization Money investor relations,

researchers started to search for a solitary researcher factors to quantify Money investor relations.

Chen Dongjie et al. (2018) accept that data revelation is a significant piece of Money investor

relations the executives. The current writing afbusiness that the quantity of examiners following

and the quantity of big business revelation are essentially emphatically corresponded with the

organization's Money investor relations exercises, so the quantity of non-obligatory divulgence

declarations and the quantity of investigator reports are utilized as intermediary factors for Money

investor relations. Feng Yanjie et al. (2019) accept that disconnected Money investor relations

exercises are completed for an enormous scope with a large number of crowds and contain a lot of

data, which will influence Money investors' assessment of the organization. In this manner, the

quantity of disconnected collaborations between the organization and Money investors, the

quantity of connections and correspondence in the movement and the quantity of expressions of

inquiries addressed are taken as the intermediary factors of Money investor relations. With the

improvement of Money investor relations the management of recorded organizations to the third

phase of Hedlin (1999) division, Online back and forth discussion in light of the intelligent stage

has turned into the most significant and helpful intelligent correspondence channel between

recorded organizations and little and medium Money investors, Numerous researchers started

utilizing on the web question and answer information to quantify Money investor relations, Wang

Bing and Dish Yan (2017) The quantity of inquiries addressed by recorded organizations on the

intelligent stage to gauge Money investor relations, Wang Tiejun (2020) takes the organization's

reaction rate to Fund investors' inquiries on the intuitive stage as the intermediary variable of

Money investor relations, that's what the explanation is, The more organizations answer Money

investors' inquiries, The more powerful the collaborations, there are, It shows that the organization

connects more significance to the development of Money investor relations, Solid administration

drive, Can all the more likely play out the correspondence capability, Give successful channels to

Fund investors to arrive at the organization, It gives them simple admittance to organization data.
Jiang Yanhui and Zheng Jia emergency room (2017), Gong Guangming and Yang Lu (2018)

accept that the more noteworthy how much data sent by the recorded organization to Back

investors on the intelligent stage, the better the organization answers and the higher the nature of

intuitive correspondence. In this manner, the quantity of words answered by the organization on

the intuitive stage is utilized as the intermediary variable of Money investor relations. Zhang Jixun

and Han Dongmei (2015) accept that the reaction season of recorded organizations on the

intelligent stage mirrors the drive of the organization's Money investor relations the executives.

The more convenient the reaction, the more grounded the drive of Money investor relationship the

executives, so it very well may be utilized as an intermediary variable for Money investor

relations.

Complete research study above, and joined with the information accessibility, the organization on

the intuitive stage for Money investors answer questions as an intermediary variable of Money

investor relations, and toward the rear of the review utilizing the intelligent stage answer number

lmean _ words and intelligent stage answer lmean _ day to quantify Money investor relations, the

comparing heartiness test.

2.3.2. Communication mode and positioning of Finance investor

relations

1. Communication of of Finance investor relations

The specialized technique utilized in the Money investor relations work is multi-channel and

staggered. Brennan and Kelly (2000) partition them into two kinds: one is formal correspondence.

Predominantly including fiscal reports and investors' gathering goals. Second, casual

correspondence. This technique can be isolated into private correspondence and public

correspondence. The previous fundamentally sends data to investigators, answers examination

reports, gives criticism to Back investors, meets with individual organizations, and holds explicit

Money investors. The last option essentially holds question and answer sessions, freely answers

corporate popular assessment, and deliveries data through media public statements.

Then, with the Greater improvement of the capital market, contest, Money investors interest for
data revelation of recorded organizations, is this time, the fast advancement of the Web, lessen the

Money investors access, the expense of the executives and improvement of data, create Money

investors can be more helpful to comprehend the organization, network has turned into the

principal method of correspondence of Money investor relations work, it gets through the

impediment of existence, for worldwide Money investors gives a better approach for

correspondence (Jones, 2002). Network Money investor relationship the management enjoys clear

benefits in decreasing expenses and working on the speed and recurrence of data update. Hedlin

(1999) partitions the organization Money investor relations into three phases: the primary stage,

the public revelation of budget reports; the subsequent stage, the web-based exposure of the

organization's stock cost and official statement, the reconciliation of the current data hotspots for

Money investors to get data; the third stage, the organization advantage, giving data intuitive

correspondence administrations, including mail, network questions and replies, and so on.

Up to now, the internet based Q & An acknowledged through the intuitive foundation of Money

investor relations has turned into the most significant and helpful intelligent correspondence

channel between recorded organizations and little and medium-sized Money investors. Online data

is confounded, and it is challenging to recognize the valid and the bogus, so Money investors

earnestly need an authority and ideal data check channel. Consequently, the intuitive foundation of

Money investor relations emerges at the noteworthy second. The intuitive stage is a valuable

instrument to the compulsory data revelation framework. It is a microblog site that coordinates

data administration works, for example, Money investors' inquiries, organization answer and

general assessment explanation. It is checked by administrative researchers and the Q & An

information is standardized (Gong Guangming and Yang Lu, 2018). Intelligent stage for Money

investors gives a better approach for the executives contact, expanded the little and medium-sized

Money investors and the organization the management communication, tong, intuitive stage,

Money investors can advance data interest, prepared to the organization the management, ask,

counseling organization the executives circumstance, or the check of tattle validness, work on the

precision of Money investors admittance to data (melody tao tan, and so on, 2016).

Simultaneously, the "shared" correspondence way create the organization the management can

straightforwardly get to Fund investors data necessities and criticism, need not depend on outsider
media intercession, immovably handle the cooperation with Money investors, the organization can

straightforwardly, completely, top to bottom to Back investors questions and unveiled data for

more point by point answer and directions, altogether further develop the organization

straightforwardness (tie-jun wang, 2020).

2. The positioning of Finance investor relations

From the beginning, crafted by Money investor relations essentially included outside data

exposure, and the revelation content was generally restricted to the monetary data revealed

obligatory by regulation. Its motivation was to give organization activity and improvement data

for institutional Money investors, investigators and individual Money investors, in order to work

with their assessment of the organization. The individual accountable for this work is normally the

organization's monetary staff. At this stage, the CEO of the organization didn't understand that

Money investor relations really has advertising capabilities (Marston, 1996). With the rising data

interest, Money investors are not generally just happy with the organization one-sided data

divulgence, and more anxious to speak with recorded organizations, Money investor relations

work into the organization and Money investors through the data correspondence foundation of

two-way correspondence, cheng, like through the organization site, phone, two-way cooperation,

this stage, Money investor relations, is characterized as a sort of data specialized devices, is the

organization practice a significant piece of exhaustive data incorporation correspondence

capability, is a sort of useful layer work (Preiholt, 2004). In the later stage, Money investor

relations have been characterized as a corporate methodology joining money and promoting,

which can help CEOs all the more precisely judge market reactions to corporate data, assist

organizations with figuring out Money investors, and fabricate a corporate procedure well known

with Money investors (Coyne and Witter, 2002). Corridor (1992) called attention to that Money

investor relations work is a significant capability of recorded organizations, is the eyes and ears,

from one perspective, it is liable for outer, Money investors declared the organization the

management results and vital preparation, then again, it can advertise data quick criticism to

organization supervisors, so the organization procedure opportune change. Organization leaders

progressively engaged with the movement, Money investor relations in created nations has turned

into the undertaking of CEOs, Marston (1998) to the UK 500 recorded organizations as an
example, the overview found that not set up Money investor relations supervisor represented just

48%, CEO and financier is the most effectively engaged with Money investor relations exercises,

the CEOs to take part in the exercises of Money investor relations for 37 days every year.

2.3.3 The role and economic consequences of Finance investor

relations

1. Diminish data unevenness and lessen supporting expenses

Through Money investor relationship the executives, there are two following ways of diminishing

data deviation and lessen supporting expenses: First, the organization's immediate data divulgence

and intelligent correspondence. Bushee and Mill operator (2012) research results demonstrate the

way that adequate, fair, clear and straightforward data can empower Money investors to

convenient and precisely comprehend the organization's genuine business circumstance and vital

targets, Money investors' venture dangers and vulnerability are extraordinarily diminished, the

necessary profit from speculation is decreased, lessening the organization's capital expenses.

Second, the circuitous effect of the examiner's way of behaving. Brockman And Chung (2003)

brought up that the investigator report is a significant way for some little and medium Money

investors to comprehend the organization, an elevated degree of Money investor relations can

further develop examiner consideration, the more the organization's experts, the more reliable

examination report, expectation precision, the better the stock liquidity, the lower the speculation

risk, Money investors require stock premium, in this manner enormously lessen the organization's

supporting expenses. Homegrown researchers Yang Deming and Xin Qingquan (2006) involved

each of the a-share recorded organizations in 2004 to study according to the viewpoint of

regulation and money, and furthermore arrived at the resolution that Money investor relations can

further develop Money investors' on the whole correct to be aware, lessen the capital expense of

ventures and improve the worth of organizations.

2. Right market deviations and guarantee that stocks really mirror the worth of the organization

According to the viewpoint of the powerful market speculation, Zhu Konglai and Li Jingjing

(2013) brought up that China's capital market is still in a feeble and successful state, and the
market worth of organizations for the most part digresses from the natural worth. Possibly it is

underestimated to genuinely esteem the organization in the financial exchange; or it is exaggerated

and increment the market chance of the organization's stock. Finance investor relationship the

executives depends on the viable premise of market shortcoming. For this situation, Money

investors have restricted reason, nature and market data imbalance. Right market deviation centers

around data revelation, and organizations can influence the stock cost by giving new data to Back

investors. Finance investor relations exercises can upgrade the correspondence and

communication between recorded organizations and Money investors, diminish data imbalance,

further develop market productivity, and guarantee that the organization's protections are in a

sensible market esteem. The research study consequences of Conger (2004) show that great

Money investor relations work will upgrade data divulgence, give data to Fund investors, work on

the straightforwardness of the organization, and assist with supporting investors to assess the

organization accurately. Through powerful data correspondence, those recorded organizations with

great Money investor relations the executives can let Money investors figure out the capacity and

anticipated execution of the organization, so the organization shares bought by Money investors

can really mirror the worth of the organization, successfully right the market valuation deviation,

and actually safeguard the genuine privileges and interests of Money investors.

3. Upgrade corporate validity and work on corporate worth

Argenti et al. (2005) show that the worth of an organization is firmly connected with the level of

trust of Money investors. In 2001, the monetary misrepresentation outrage of Enron set off an

emergency of trust of market Money investors in recorded organizations, and the vulnerability of

the financial climate expanded. Notwithstanding the obscure and wild monetary circumstance

looked by the organization's future turn of events, there was additionally whether the view of the

organization's presentation was in the public assumptions. For this situation, reinforcing the

correspondence with Money investors and upgrading data revelation has turned into the way to

reshaping the believability of the organization. Finance investor relations exercises can

fundamentally build Money investors' confidence in the organization, advance the stock cost rise,

and increment the worth of the organization. Mama Lianfu and Zhao Ying (2006) brought up that

great Money investor relations can assist recorded organizations with keeping up with long haul
great connection between Money investors, gather great monetary standing, in the capital market,

lay out a decent organization picture, get steady market support, open funding channels, make

serious boundaries, at last makes the organization business and stock worth. Quan Xiaofeng et al.

(2016) additionally called attention to that in brain science, the reason of laying out feeling and

trust is commonality. Finance investor relations can work on the nature of data exposure,

increment Money investors' experience with the organization, and improve the validity of

recorded organizations in the hearts of Money investors.

2.4 CEO background and Finance investor relations

The Money investor relationship of recorded organizations not just relies upon the inborn qualities

of the organization, for example, organization size, monetary influence proportion, productivity

and corporate administration, yet in addition is firmly connected with the subject of Money

investor relationship navigation — — ranking directors. Gu Wenjun (2004) called attention to that

the absence of cognizance of CEOs is a significant variable limiting the advancement of Money

investor relations in China. As indicated by the hypothesis of senior echelon, the Individual

Capital Construction Hypothesis attributes of supervisors will influence their mental premise,

different aversion to outer climate and data handling, and afterward influence the directors 'choice

on the organization's Money investor relations technique. Based on this hypothesis, Braguinsk and

Mityakov (2015) accept that the fast improvement of corporate Money investor relations in

developing business sectors originates from the disease of the high level institutional climate

abroad. With the improvement of financial globalization, between economies in view of assets,

labor, capital, innovation and components, for example, participation and correspondence,

worldwide organizations and cross-line ability not just bring trend setting innovation, and the

executives experience, additionally brought more grounded Money investor security awareness

and more straightforward venture culture, the high level unfamiliar Money investor relations

framework climate to the homegrown dissemination, advance the germination of neighborhood

Money investor relationship exercises. Chen Dongjie et al. (2018) accept that the secretary of the

management is the immediate top of the Money investor relations, and the secretary is named by
the top managerial staff. Accordingly, the directorate is the genuine leader of the Money investor

relations of the organization. On this premise, with a-share recorded organization information for

exact examples, the end shows that the returnees CEOs and Money investor relations

fundamentally sure, have, Abroad Social foundation CEOs by the western high level Money

investor relations framework, comprehend the high level abroad Money investors, the

administration experience, when they become A homegrown undertaking CEOs, will apply the

information and experience to the general population, the choice judgment, to work fair and

square of Money investor relations, and, the CEOs had abroad, home Money investor relations

framework is more grounded, the head of Abroad Conduct foundation and Money investor

relations more critical.

Notwithstanding Abroad Social foundation, Jiang Fuxiu (2016) likewise concentrated on the CEO

monetary foundation because of Money investor relations, the outcomes show that the monetary

foundation will further develop administrator secretary monetary proficiency, increment, the

organization's monetary commonality, comprehend the public data divulgence needs, in this

manner, with the monetary experience of the director secretary can all the more profoundly

correspondence with Money investors, make the data conveyed to Fund investors more expert,

sound, straightforward, to upgrade correspondence association with Money investors and the

nature of data exposure, diminish data deviation, improve Money investor relations, and lessen the

expense of supporting, ease organization funding limitations. The more extended the management

secretary is participated in monetary work, the less delicate his organization is to venture income,

and the more prominent the alleviation impact on the organization's supporting limitations.

2.5 Related concepts and theoretical foundations

The Money investor relationship of recorded organizations not just relies upon the innate attributes

of the organization, for example, organization size, monetary influence proportion, productivity

and corporate administration, yet additionally is firmly connected with the subject of Money

investor relationship navigation — — ranking directors. Gu Wenjun (2004) brought up that the

absence of discernment of CEOs is a significant variable confining the improvement of Money

investor relations in China. As indicated by the hypothesis of senior echelon, the Individual
Capital Construction Hypothesis attributes of CEOs will influence their mental premise, different

aversion to outer climate and data handling, and afterward influence the supervisors 'choice on the

organization's Money investor relations technique. Based on this hypothesis, Braguinsk and

Mityakov (2015) accept that the quick improvement of corporate Money investor relations in

developing business sectors originates from the disease of the high level institutional climate

abroad. With the improvement of monetary globalization, between economies in view of assets,

labor, capital, innovation and components, for example, collaboration and correspondence,

worldwide organizations and cross-line ability not just bring cutting edge innovation, and the

management insight, additionally brought more grounded Money investor assurance awareness

and more straightforward undertaking society, the high level unfamiliar Money investor relations

framework climate to the homegrown dissemination, advance the germination of nearby Money

investor relationship exercises. Chen Dongjie et al. (2018) accept that the secretary of the

management is the immediate top of the Money investor relations, and the secretary is delegated

by the top managerial staff. Consequently, the directorate is the genuine leader of the Money

investor relations of the organization. On this premise, with a-share recorded organization

information for experimental examples, the end shows that the returnees CEOs and Money

investor relations fundamentally sure, have, Abroad Conduct foundation CEOs by the western

high level Money investor relations framework, comprehend the high level abroad Money

investors, the administration experience, when they become A homegrown undertaking CEOs, will

apply the information and experience to people in general, the choice judgment, to work fair and

square of Money investor relations, and, the CEOs had abroad, home Money investor relations

framework is more grounded, the overseer of Abroad Social foundation and Money investor

relations more huge.

Notwithstanding Abroad Conduct foundation, Jiang Fuxiu (2016) additionally concentrated on the

CEO monetary foundation because of Money investor relations, the outcomes show that the

monetary foundation will further develop director secretary monetary proficiency, increment, the

organization's monetary commonality, comprehend the public data revelation needs, in this

manner, with the monetary experience of the executive secretary can all the more profoundly

correspondence with Money investors, make the data conveyed to Fund investors more expert,
believable, straightforward, to improve correspondence connection with Money investors and the

nature of data exposure, decrease data unevenness, upgrade Money investor relations, and lessen

the expense of supporting, ease organization funding limitations. The more extended the

management secretary is participated in monetary work, the less delicate his organization is to

venture income, and the more noteworthy the relief impact on the organization's funding

limitations.

Third, in the investigation of Money investor relations, a few researchers have arrived at similar

resolutions, while some have extraordinary contrasts. The justification for the distinction might lie

in the absence of ① research hypothesis. Hamid (2003) brought up that as of now, there are not

many hypothetical examinations on Money investor relations, there is no extraordinary hypothesis

to make sense of Money investor relations, and there is no brought together and legitimate norm

for the estimation of Money investor relations. There are extraordinary contrasts in the

consideration content of researchers while assessing Money investor relations. ② Estimation

blunder of the information. In many Money investor relations research information, the

information of arbitrary meetings and surveys are utilized to build IR pointers, and these

information have solid subjectivity and estimation error.③ The research study subjects are situated

in various capital market conditions.

 3. Theoretical analysis and research hypotheses

As per the administration power hypothesis, when the organization is profoundly unified, the CEO

is at the highest point of the organization's power and has the most elevated dynamic force of the

organization's activity and the management (Haynes and Hillman, 2010). The highest level

hypothesis shows that the CEO's Abroad Conduct foundation is an extraordinary individual

trademark, which influences his mental premise, changes his aversion to the outer climate and the

translation and handling of data, and hence influences corporate choices (Hambrick and

Bricklayer, 1984). By laying out the dynamic "marking" process, the Engraving Hypothesis More

explains the component of the CEO's Abroad Conduct foundation affecting the organization's

navigation. The printing hypothesis expresses that, Because of the conspicuous institutional and

social contrasts between nations, The period when the CEO studies or work abroad is a "delicate

period," Will be influenced by the abroad friendly culture, the monetary climate, the general set of

laws, The first mental construction and values are being tested, During this delicate period, To

facilitate the tension emerging from this new climate, The CEO goes through the method involved

with being "marked," Structure the mental qualities and capacity qualities that are adjusted to the

abroad climate, Even after the CEO gets back, The "engrave" of this abroad experience proceeds,

Influthe CEO, the executives choices on the organization (Dokko et al., 2009).

As per the above examination, the Abroad Social foundation basically impacts the CEO's

administration choice on the organization's Money investor relations from the accompanying two

angles:

From one perspective, the Abroad Social foundation makes the CEO structure a "mental brand"

and has a more grounded mental reason for Money investor relations. Finance investor relations in

China is still in its earliest stages, the capital market assurance of Money investors still needs to be

reinforced, and in abroad evolved nations, Money investor relations framework more awesome,

Money investor security cognizance more grounded (Chen Dongjie, 2018), simultaneously, the

western created nations have mature social obligation school system, joins extraordinary

significance to the understudy business morals (Wen and Melody Jianbo, 2017), with Abroad
Conduct foundation of CEO long high level Money investor relations framework and high upright

guidelines, in mental slowly with abroad assembly, focus harder on the organization

straightforward culture and Money investor assurance. Furthermore, the Abroad Conduct

foundation can improve the CEO's self-reflection and foreknowledge and spotlight on the drawn

out advancement of the organization (Suutari and Makela, 2007). Finance investor relationship

development is a drawn out venture of the organization, which can assist the organization with

laying out a decent picture of the capital market, diminish supporting expenses and upgrade the

worth of the organization. Abroad experience provides the CEO with a more profound

comprehension of the significance of Money investor relations, more prescience in direction, and

more thoughtfulness regarding the Money investor relations the management of the organization.

Then again, the Abroad Social foundation makes the CEO structure a "capacity brand" and has a

more grounded capacity to oversee Money investor relations. CEO with Abroad Social foundation

is generally considered to have a more wonderful information structure, more grounded proficient

abilities and higher administration capacity (Duan and Hou, 2015), is bound to ensure the

organization Money investor relations exercises framework the management, by refreshing the

hierarchical construction, plan severe working framework and working determination, choose

related dependable faculty, work fair and square of the organization's Money investor relations.

Likewise, in the abroad experience, the CEO can contact the very front of Money investor

relations hypothesis and the management work on, learning the high level abroad Money investor

relations the executives experience, which improves the CEO Money investor relations the

executives capacity, when they get back, will apply the learned information and experience to the

organization choice, subsequently bound to appropriately deal with the Money investor relations

the management cycle of a succession of complicated issues.

To summarize, Abroad Conduct foundation will leave "mental brand" and "capacity brand" on the

CEO, with the goal that the CEO will have a more grounded mental establishment and higher

administration capacity for Money investor relations, in this manner influencing the Money

investor relations of the organization. Consequently, the accompanying examination speculations

are proposed. Research speculation: the CEO's Abroad Social foundation will further develop the

Money investor relations of ventures.

 4. Research Assumptions and Model Design

4.1 Research Assumptions, Sample Selection and Data Sources

This paper concentrates on the effect of CEO Abroad Conduct foundation on corporate Money

investor relations. Beginning around 2009, China research study Information Administration Stage

(CNRDS) has distributed the intuitive information of recorded organizations on the intelligent

Money investor relations stage. Hence, this paper chooses the management information of each of

the a-share non-monetary recorded organizations from 2009 to 2018 as the essential example. The

intuitive information of Money investor relations expected in this paper comes from the Money

investor relations the management data set of China research study Information Administration

Stage (CNRDS), CEO. The Abroad Social foundation information comes from the person

attributes data set of Taian recorded organizations, and the other monetary information is likewise

from the Taian data set. As indicated by the review practice, the Succeed and Stata 14.0

programming were utilized to handle the accompanying measures:

(1) Eliminate the observed value of the undisclosed Overseas Behavioral background data of the

CEO required in the study.

(2) Eliminate the observed values specially treated during the sample period.

(3) Excluding the data of the year when the company is listed.

(4) All continuous variables are reduced in a proportion of 1%.

After processing, the sample contained 17,641 company-annual observations.

4.2 Variable Selection

4.2.1 The explained Model (1) Variables

Finance investor Relations IR. In this paper, the reaction pace of recorded organizations to Fund

investors' inquiries on the intelligent stage fills in as the intermediary variable of Money investor
relations. The explanations behind estimating Money investor relations by this variable are as per

the following:

① Unbiasedly, the essential motivation behind Money investor relations is to lay out and keep up

with long haul significant relationship with Money investors, and lay out and keep up with the

relationship is correspondence (Mama Lianfu and Zhao Ying, 2006), the CSRC gave the "rules" 6

showed, intuitive correspondence standard is the fundamental guideline of Money investor

relations, acknowledge Money investor interview is the principal obligation of Money investor

relations the management, the organization on the intelligent stage for Money investors answer

questions as intermediary factors of Money investor relations, adjust to the definition and

undertone of Money investor relations. Moreover, China research study Information

Administration Stage (CNRDS) has set up a section on Money investor relations the management,

in which Money investor organization connection is a significant part module. CNRDS As a great

complete information stage for monetary and monetary research study, it is incorporated by

colleges, and the information is cited by numerous researchers and has significant position. This

paper takes the Money investor relationship cooperation information acquired on CNRDS as the

researcher variable of IR, covering many organizations and huge measure of information, and the

information is completely evaluated by CNRDS and of high quality. ② From the reason behind

existing research study, acknowledge Money investor counseling is the principal obligation of

Money investor relations, intuitive correspondence quality is a significant record of Money

investor relations of recorded organizations (Li Xinda, 2006), Chen ya (2016) will pay all due

respects to Fund investors FAQ as a significant part of building IR pointers, Feng Yanjie (2019) to

the organization and Money investors disconnected connection number, exercises of intelligent

issues as Money investor relations. With the improvement of the Web, the Money investor

relationship the management of recorded organizations has created to the third phase of Hedlin

(1999): give full play to the upsides of the organization and give data intelligent correspondence

administrations. Online inquiries and answers in view of the intelligent foundation of Money

investor relations has turned into the primary method of collaboration and correspondence

between recorded organizations and Money investors, and the different sides comprise a total

communication (Wang Tiejun, 2020). The higher the reaction pace of the organization to Back
investors' inquiries, the more the viable associations between the two gatherings, the more the

organization connects significance to the development of Money investor relations, has solid

administration drive, and can practice the correspondence capability. It gives a compelling channel

to Fund investors to contact the organization and gives advantageous circumstances to them to

acquire organization data (Quan Xiaofeng et al., 2016). According to one more perspective,

Money investor relationship the management takes time and cost. Very much oversaw

organizations for the most part contribute more and are bound to fabricate an ideal correspondence

system, so they like to answer to Fund investors' inquiries on the intuitive stage; in any case,

unfortunate administration organizations don't contribute time and cost to lay out Money investor

relations the executives component without the assurance of good correspondence with Money

investors, so the inspiration to answer Money investors on the intelligent stage is frail. In light of

this, wang bing and Dish Yan (2017) to the recorded organization on the intuitive stage answer

question number of Money investor relations, yet the quantity of recorded organizations answer to

a great extent relies upon the quantity of Money investors questions, so tie-jun wang (2020) to

make improvement, to the organization on the intelligent stage for Money investors questions

reaction rate as an intermediary variable of Money investor relations. In view of the above

research, this paper utilizes the reaction pace of recorded organizations 'reactions to Back

investors' inquiries on the intuitive stage to gauge Money investor relations. Among them, the

particular estimation strategy for the reaction rate is as per the following:

It should be noted that in the following research, the interactive platform reply number lmean _

words and the interactive platform reply timeliness lmean _ day were also used to measure

Finance investor relations and conduct the corresponding robustness test.

4.2.2 The explanatory Model (2) Variables

CEO Overseas Behavioral background oversea. Referring to Giannetti et al. (2015), if the CEO of

the company has studied or worked outside of mainland China, he is considered to have an

Overseas Behavioral background. At the same time, to ensure that overseas work experience truly

reflects the impact of the foreign environment, people working in a foreign branch of a Chinese

enterprise, a domestic branch of a foreign or joint venture are not considered to have an Overseas

Behavioral background. This variable is a virtual variable, assigned a value of 1 when the CEO of

the listed company has an Overseas Behavioral background, or 0 otherwise.

4.2.3 Control variables

In addition to using industry virtual variable ind and year virtual variable year to control industry

and time effect, this paper also selects the following control variables:

(1) Company size size. This variable takes the natural logarithm of the total assets at the end of the

year. Gao Chunyan (2016) pointed out that smaller companies are more willing to use Finance

investor relations management in various ways and means, aiming to improve corporate

transparency and competitiveness to attract more analysts and institutional Finance investors.

(2) Financial leverage ratio lev. This variable is the total liabilities / total assets of the company at

the end of the year. Craven And Marston (1997) believes that Banks and other creditors will be

focused on the financial health of debt company, if they produce the company solvency trust

crisis, will be a fatal blow to the company, in order to avoid, avoid the serious consequences, high

financial leverage, high debt level companies tend to more Finance investor relations activities.

However, Zhao Ying (2009) took a sample of 800 listed companies on the Shanghai Stock

Exchange and found that the debt level would have a negative effect on Finance investor relations,

which is significantly different from the conclusions of foreign studies.

(3) Age of the listed company is listage. This variable is taken as the report year-the listing year of

the company + 1. Chen Dongjie et al. (2018) showed that the age of listed companies was

significantly negatively correlated with Finance investor relations.

(4) Return on total assets roa. This variable measures the profitability of the company and taking
the average balance of the company's net profit / total assets. Ettredge et al. (2001) studies show

that in order to attract Finance investors 'attention, companies with good performance distinguish

themselves from companies with poor performance, attract Finance investors to buy stocks,

increase the liquidity of the company's securities, and will be more motivated to communicate and

interact with Finance investors. Lin Bin et al. (2005) took the listed companies on the main

management of Shenzhen Stock Exchange as samples to construct the Finance investor relations

index of the company's website, and conducted empirical tests on the factors affecting the

disclosure level of the company's website. The results also showed that the disclosure level of the

company's website was significantly positively correlated with the profitability of the company.

(5) Tobin Q value total. Tobin Q value can measure the company growth and investment

opportunities, this variable is based on the company market value / total assets.

(6) Enterprise free cash flow, fcf. This variable measures company liquidity as (operating cash

flow-capital expenditure) / total assets. Wallace and Naser (1995) studied from the perspective of

corporate liquidity and found that Finance investors tend to choose companies with high liquidity

and good future development in the investment. When the current and dynamic liabilities mature,

the company only needs to use current assets to repay, rather than selling other long-term fixed

assets to raise funds. Therefore, companies with high liquidity will take the initiative to carry out

Finance investor relations activities to attract Finance investors' attention.

(7) The shareholding ratio of the largest shareholder is top1hold. This variable measures the

concentration degree of equity, taking the number of shares held by the largest shareholder / the

number of shares of the company. Eng and Mak (2003) research shows that the first big

shareholders usually have greater control of the company, they can put pressure on managers,

conspired with managers or, control the management of directors for their own interests, obtain

internal information, the company with small and medium-sized Finance investors interactive

communication will reduce, namely the first big shareholder stake and the company Finance

investor relations.

(8) Two posts in one, dua. This variable is a dummy variable, assigning a value of 1 when the

CEO and the general manager are one person, or 0 otherwise. Forker (1992) Research shows that

when the chairman of the management of directors serves as CEO, that is, the two positions are
combined, the separation of decision management and control is absent, the company's

information disclosure will decrease, and the Finance investor relations activities cannot be well

implemented.

(9) Management shareholding ratio of manage. This variable takes the number of management

holdings / the number of shares of the company. Zhao ying (2009) of the empirical results show

that the management stake with Finance investor relations, and significant in the new listed

companies and small companies, this is because the insider in order to improve stock liquidity,

attract Finance investors to buy its selling shares, will pay more attention to information

disclosure, Finance investor relations activities.

(10) Equity nature of soe. This variable is a dummy variable assigned a value of 1 when the

company is a state-owned enterprise or 0 otherwise. Specific definitions of each variable are given

in Table 4-1.

Table 4-1 Variable Selection

type of variable Variable name variable symbol Variable definition

explained variable Finance investor IR Listed companies in

relations the Finance investor

relations interactive

platform

Question response

rate, take the number

of company responses

The annual number of

questions asked by

Finance investors

explanatory variable The CEO has an oversea Virtual variable, when

Overseas Behavioral the CEO of a listed

background company, has the sea

The value is assigned

 to 1 on the outer

background, or to 0

otherwise

controlled variable company size size Natural log of the

company's total assets

at the end of the year

Financial leverage lev Total liabilities / total

ratio assets at the end of the

year

The company's listing listage Year of report-Year of

age company listing + 1

all capital earnings roa Average balance of

rate net profit / total assets

Tobin Q value tobin Company market

value / total assets

Corporate free cash fcf (Operating cash flow-

flow capital expenditure

Out) / Total assets

The largest top1hold Number of shares held

shareholder holds the by the largest

stake shareholder / total

scale shares of the company

quantity

Two jobs in one dua Virtual variables,

when the chairman

and CEO, is one

person

Assigned a value of 1,

and 0 otherwise

Management manage Number of

 shareholding management

holdings / number of

company shares

nature of stock rights soe Virtual variable, when

the equity nature is a

state-owned enterprise

Assigned a value of 1,

and 0 otherwise

Industry dummy ind According to the

variable to level 2 CSRC 2001 version of

code the industry code

setting

Virtual variables, of

which, manufacturing

takes

Vintage virtual year Take 2009 as the

variable benchmark, 2010-

2018

Set up to 9 dummy

variables

4.3 Empirical model design

To test the impact of CEO Abroad Social foundation on corporate Money investor relations,

alluding to Li Xindan et al. (2006), Zhao Ying (2009), Chen Dongjie et al. (2018), corporate

Money investor relations IR as the reliant variable and CEO Abroad Conduct foundation oversea

as the free factor, and the previously mentioned control factors were added to lay out a various

direct relapse model. The particular numerical articulation of the model is as per the following:
 (1)

Where i is the company, t is the year, which is a constant term and an error term. For the

coefficient of the explanatory variable oversea, this assumption holds when significantly positive.
 5. The empirical results and analysis

5.1 Descriptive statistics

Descriptive statistics of the main variables of the selected samples in this paper are
shown in Table Table 5-1.

Table 5-1: Descriptive Statistics

variable N mean sd min p25 p50 p75 max

IR 11311 0.747 0.365 0 0.667 0.942 1 1
oversea 17641 0.069 0.253 0 0 0 0 1
size 17640 22.063 1.311 19.546 21.129 21.885 22.797 26.008
lev 17640 0.447 0.210 0.051 0.281 0.446 0.611 0.892
listage 17641 10.854 6.529 0 5 10 16 24
roa 17640 0.039 0.053 -0.161 0.014 0.035 0.065 0.194
tobin 16798 2.552 1.784 0.921 1.400 1.976 3.026 10.981
fcf 17640 0.004 0.100 -0.370 -0.028 0.015 0.054 0.251
top1hold 17641 0.355 0.153 0.088 0.233 0.336 0.461 0.757
dua 17459 0.236 0.424 0 0 0 0 1
manage 16991 0.113 0.192 0 0 0.000 0.159 0.682
soe 17388 0.443 0.497 0 0 0 1 1

As can be seen from Table 5-1, The mean of Finance investor relations IR was 0.747,
The median value was 0.942, in other words, On the interactive Finance investor
relations platform, The average response rate was 74.7%, The median response rate
was 94.2%, At a higher level, It shows that China's listed companies as a whole, Good
at using network channels for Finance investor relations management, Can better
exercise the function of Finance investor relations communication, Provide an
effective channel for Finance investors to reach the company, Strong willingness to
interact with Finance investors; The maximum value of IR is 1, The minimum value is
0, Between the individual companies, Using interactive platforms in Finance investor
relations management, Some listed companies can respond 100% to questions from
Finance investors on the interactive platform, Active communication with Finance
investors, Some companies completely ignore Finance investor questions, Low level
of Finance investor relations management, This difference provides a good
opportunity for the present study.
The mean worth of CEO Abroad Conduct foundation oversea was 0.069,
demonstrating that 6.9% of the example of noticed values had abroad review or work
foundation. The 75th score is 0. By and large, the extent of CEOs of Chinese recorded
organizations with Abroad Conduct foundation is currently at a low level. In the
control factors, as far as the normal organization attributes, Organization size
somewhere in the range of 19.546 and 26.008, Mean of 22.063;, monetary influence
lev somewhere in the range of 0.051 and 0.892, The mean worth was 0.447, Showed
that the resource risk proportion of each organization in the example fluctuates
enormously, However by and large, The normal obligation level of China's recorded
organizations isn't high; The typical age listage of recorded organizations was 10.854;
Return on all out resources roa somewhere in the range of 0.161 and 0.194, The mean
worth was 0.039; The Tobin Q esteem tobin is somewhere in the range of 0.921 and
10.981, The mean worth was 2.552, It shows that the development of China's
recorded organizations shifts significantly; Corporate free income fcf is somewhere in
the range of 0.370 and 0.251, The mean worth was 0.004, It shows that the general
liquidity of recorded organizations in China isn't high.
In terms of corporate governance and equity characteristics, The average top1hold
shareholding ratio of the largest shareholder is 0.355, The maximum value was 0.757,
The minimum value is 0.088, 25 A quantile value greater than 0.2, Suggest that, in the
sample data, The phenomenon of "one dominant company" is more common; The
mean of the two-duty dua is 0.236, That is, in the sample, The CEO and chairman
concurrently accounted for 23.6%; The average management shareholding ratio
manage is 0.113, The minimum value is 0, The maximum value is 0.682; Equity
nature soe with a mean of 0.443, Suggest that, in the sample, 44.3 percent of the
companies were state-owned enterprises. In addition, this paper also groups the
samples according to whether the CEO had the Overseas Behavioral background, and
tested for the mean and median differences between the groups. The descriptive
statistical results of the groups are shown in Table 5-2.

Table 5-2 Descriptive statistics of sample grouping

mean median

oversea=0 oversea=1 MeanDiff oversea=0 oversea=1 Chi2

IR 0.74 0.821 -0.081*** 0.94 0.961 16.445***
size 22.068 21.996 0.072* 21.895 21.763 9.553***
lev 0.451 0.394 0.057*** 0.451 0.387 48.364***

listage 11.006 8.802 2.204*** 11 7 175.050***

roa 0.039 0.043 -0.004*** 0.035 0.038 6.840***
tobin 2.511 3.109 -0.599*** 1.954 2.393 60.030***
fcf 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.015 0.013 1.413
top1hold 0.355 0.349 0.006 0.337 0.328 2.082
dua 0.229 0.318 -0.088*** 0 0 48.445***
manage 0.109 0.161 -0.051*** 0 0.017 124.722***
soe 0.458 0.236 0.223*** 0 0 223.040***

From table 5-2 grouping test results, compared with hire local CEO company, hire
with Overseas Behavioral background CEO company Finance investor relationship
level is higher, smaller enterprises, lower financial leverage, the company listed
younger, total assets yield is higher, Tobin Q value, two and higher, higher
management shareholding, lower proportion of state-owned enterprises.
5.2 Correlation analysis

The connection investigation can make a starter judgment on the connection between
the factors and test the multicollinearity. Table 5-3 shows the consequences of the
Pearson relationship coefficient of the primary factors in this paper. As should be
visible from Table 5-3, Money investor relationship IR and CEO Abroad Conduct
foundation oversea are essentially decidedly connected at the importance level of 1%,
demonstrating that CEO Abroad Social foundation will altogether further develop the
Money investor relations and upgrade the cooperation and correspondence between
the organization and Money investors, which is reliable with the speculation of this
paper; all the control factors, with the exception of the undertaking free income fcf,
have critical connection with The made sense of Model (1) Variabless.

Table 5-3 Correlation coefficient matrix

IR over size lev lista roa tobi fcf top1 dua man s
sea ge n hold age o
e
IR 1
ove 0.06 1
rsea 2**
*
size - - 1
0.26 0.01
6** 4*
*
lev - - 0.48 1
0.22 0.06 3**
6** 9*** *
*
lista - - 0.30 0.33 1
ge 0.32 0.08 0** 5***
3** 6*** *
*
roa 0.05 0.02 - - - 1
3** 1*** 0.02 0.37 0.20
* 6** 6*** 0***
*
tobi 0.13 0.08 - - - 0.20 1
n 8** 5*** 0.45 0.36 0.13 6***
* 9** 3*** 0***
*
fcf - - - - - 0.12 - 1
0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 7*** 0.00
4 2 9** 6 8*** 4
top - - 0.20 0.08 - 0.12 - 0.05 1
1ho 0.05 0.01 6** 0*** 0.09 5*** 0.10 8**
ld 7** 0 * 0*** 5** *
* *
dua 0.12 0.05 - - - 0.05 0.12 0.00 - 1
6** 3*** 0.16 0.14 0.21 6*** 7** 4 0.04
* 4** 3*** 0*** * 9***
*
man 0.26 0.06 - - - 0.18 0.22 0.04 - 0.26 1
age 7** 8*** 0.30 0.34 0.55 7*** 4** 0** 0.08 1***
* 8** 7*** 9*** * * 3***
*
soe - - 0.35 0.31 0.40 - - - 0.19 - - 1
0.26 0.11 0** 0*** 2*** 0.13 0.26 0.00 7*** 0.29 0.49
9** 5** 4**
 * 3*** * 0*** * 5 0*** *

Except for the Pearson correlation coefficient of all the variables in the table, and the
correlation coefficient of the correlation coefficient of the other variables does not
exceed 0.5. It can be preliminarily judged that this model is not troubled by
multicollinearity problems. However, from the significance of the correlation
coefficients between the variables, most of the coefficients were significant at the
significance level of 1%. Therefore, for More judgment, the VIF test was conducted
for each variable in this paper, and the test results are shown in Table 5-4. VIF for
each variable, the mean value was 1.45 and the maximum value was 1.97, indicating
that the sample data have relatively high discrimination and there is no
multicollinearity.

Table 5-4, VIF for each variable

Variable VIF 1/VIF
oversea 1.02 0.9773
size 1.97 0.5077
lev 1.91 0.5236
listage 1.83 0.5474
fcf 1.03 0.9692
roa 1.36 0.7333
tobin 1.38 0.7254
manage 1.70 0.5889
dua 1.10 0.9091
top1hold 1.09 0.9146
soe 1.55 0.6442
Mean VIF 1.45
5.3 Analysis of the regression results

To More decide the examination speculation, in this paper, stata14.0 was utilized to
relapse the review model (1) to forestall heteroscedasticity or grouping
autocorrelation, the accompanying returns the bunching hearty standard blunder at the
organization level. Table 5-5, shows the relapse consequences of the effect of CEO
Abroad Conduct foundation on corporate Money investor relations. Table 5-5
columns (1) shows the regression results controlling only for fixed effects of industry
and year, and the coefficient of CEO Overseas Behavioral background oversea is
0.069 and is significant at the significance level of 1%. Table 5-5 columns (2) After
the inclusion of other control variables, Adjusted R 2 was increased from 0.20 to 0.28,
The model's interpretation of the dependent variable Finance investor relationship IR
is enhanced; The coefficient of oversea was decreased to 0.038, As yet being critical
at the importance level of 1%, In accordance with the assumptions, From a financial
perspective, Contrasted with the organizations that utilize nearby CEOs,
Organizations that enlist abroad CEOs got 3.8 percent more reactions to Fund investor
inquiries on intelligent stages, as such, The CEO's Abroad Social foundation can
altogether further develop the organization's Money investor relations, Organizations
that employ abroad CEOs are more proactive to involve intelligent stages for Money
investor relationship the management, Bound to answer Money investor inquiries,
More readiness to collaborate with Money investors, Can more readily practice the
correspondence capability, Give powerful channels to Back investors to arrive at the
organization, To work with their admittance to organization data.

Table 5-5 Overseas Behavioral background of the CEO vs

(1) (2)
IR IR
oversea 0.069 *** 0.038 ***
(5.22) (2.94)
 size -0.034 ***
(-4.71)
lev -0.059 *
(-1.83)
listage -0.009 ***
(-7.79)
roa 0.187 *
(1.92)
tobin -0.012 ***
(-4.17)
fcf -0.043
(-1.42)
top1hold -0.053
(-1.41)
dua 0.020 **
(2.18)
manage 0.092 ***
(4.46)
soe -0.047 ***
(-2.95)
_cons 0.741 *** 1.644 ***
(130.26) (10.94)
ind Yes Yes
year Yes Yes
r2_a 0.20 0.28
F 27.21 37.25
N 11311 10396

From the relapse consequences of the control factors, The organization size
coefficient is altogether regrettable, Proposing that the more modest the organization
is being found, The higher the degree of Money investor relationship the executives,
Predictable with the finish of Gao Chunyan (2016), Little organizations, contrasted
with huge ones, The opposition pressure is much more noteworthy, to improve their
own intensity, More inspiration to speak with Money investors; The monetary
influence proportion lev coefficient is essentially negative, Steady with the review
finish of Zhao Ying (2009), The conceivable explanation is that profoundly obligated
organizations are accustomed to giving securities, getting from banks or neglecting to
meet the value supporting circumstances, The main goal is to assemble great
associations with lenders, Speak with loan bosses through interviews and discussions,
Won't zero in on the correspondence and connection with little and medium-sized
Money investors; The RA ROA coefficient was significantly positive, Consistent with
the previous studies, Profitable companies try to differentiate themselves from those
with poor performance, Attract Finance investors to buy shares, Strong motivation for
Finance investor management; The fcf coefficient of corporate free cash flow is not
significant, Perhaps because of the majority of retail Finance investors in China's
stock market, Generally by examiners, Without an essential speculation vision,
Absence of consideration regarding the liquidity of recorded organizations, hence,
Highliquid organizations have minimal motivator to oversee Money investor
relations; The top1hold coefficient of the biggest investor is negative, However not
fundamentally, that's what it shows albeit the significant investors have more
prominent command over the organization, Yet the organization doesn't zero in on the
interests of significant investors, Disregarding the development of Money investor
relations. The oversee coefficient of the administration shareholding proportion is
fundamentally certain, which is reliable with the experimental consequences of Zhao
Ying (2009). To work on the stock liquidity and draw in Money investors to purchase
the stocks offered, the administration will focus closer on data exposure and do Fund
investor relations exercises. The soe coefficient of value nature is altogether
regrettable, showing that the degree of Money investor relationship the executives of
non-state-claimed undertakings is higher.

5.4 More analysis

In order to More investigate the internal function mechanism of CEO Overseas

Behavioral background to improve the company's Finance investor relations, this
paper also conducts an in-depth analysis from the perspectives of Overseas
Behavioral background type difference, CEO management autonomy difference and
company transparency difference.

5.4.1 Group by Overseas Behavioral background of CEO

According to the research conclusions of Dai Junhao and Kong Dongmin (2017),
there may be differences in the degree of influence between overseas learning
experience and overseas work experience on CEO. In order to investigate the
influence of different types of CEO Overseas Behavioral background on corporate
Finance investor relations, this paper More constructs the virtual variable: ①
Overseas learning background oversea_edu. Assign a value of 1 when the CEO had an
overseas learning experience, and 0 otherwise. ② Overseas work background
oversea_work.1 when the CEO has overseas work experience, 0 otherwise. The
oversea of these two variables in the model (1) were regressed again to compare the
impact of different types of CEO Overseas Behavioral background on corporate
Finance investor relations. The regression results are shown in Tables 5 – 6.

Table 5-6 For the different types of CEOs

(1) (2)
IR IR
oversea_edu 0.021
(1.14)
oversea_work 0.046 ***

(2.59)

size -0.033 *** -0.033 ***

(-4.64) (-4.67)
lev -0.060 * -0.060 *
(-1.88) (-1.86)
listage -0.009 *** -0.009 ***
(-7.86) (-7.86)

roa 0.185 * 0.184 *

(1.89) (1.88)
tobin -0.011 *** -0.011 ***
(-4.00) (-4.06)
fcf -0.043 -0.042
(-1.39) (-1.37)
top1hold -0.053 -0.053
(-1.41) (-1.41)
dua 0.021 ** 0.020 **
(2.25) (2.13)
manage 0.090 *** 0.092 ***
(4.34) (4.43)
soe -0.049 *** -0.048 ***
(-3.05) (-3.02)
_cons 1.637 *** 1.639 ***
(10.89) (10.92)
ind Yes Yes
year Yes Yes
r2_a 0.28 0.28
F 36.48 36.94
N 10396 10396

As should be visible from the relapse brings about Table 5-6 (1), the coefficient of
oversea_edu isn't huge, showing that the CEO abroad learning foundation has no
critical impact on the corporate Money investor relationship; the coefficient of
oversea_work in Table 5-6 (2) is fundamentally certain at the importance level of 1%,
demonstrating that the CEO abroad work foundation can altogether further develop
the corporate Money investor relationship. At its root, The reason for this difference
may be that, Most CEOs with overseas learning experience only receive theoretical
knowledge education in school, Inadequate awareness of the Finance investor
relations system, And a lack of management experience, May place more emphasis on
information disclosure, And neglect to interact with Finance investors; While the
CEOs who have worked abroad can really partake in the capital market practice,
Contact with the neighborhood regulations, guidelines, strategies and frameworks,
Comprehension of state of the art Money investor relations hypothesis and the
management rehearses, Gain from the high level Money investor relations the
executives experience from abroad, The "mental brand" and "capacity brand" are
more self-evident, A more grounded mental reason for Money investor relations, I
likewise have greater administration experience, More combination with abroad in
genuine choices, Ttend to be more proactive in speaking with Money investors, Lay
out great Money investor relations.
5.4.2 Group by CEO management autonomy

The reason that the CEO's Abroad Social foundation can influence the organization's
Money investor relations is that the CEO has more prominent influence and can
impact the organization's choices. Wei and Ling (2015) called attention to that the
administration independence of the CEO is essentially decidedly related with the
effect of its social choices on the organization. Du Yong (2018), More called attention
to that the CEO administration independence will be impacted by outer monetary
elements and institutional variables, the less outside limitations, the CEO has the more
noteworthy administration independence, the higher the conduct opportunity, for this
situation, the CEO Abroad Social foundation left "mental" and "capacity" will have
more noteworthy effect on the organization choice. Subsequently, this segment will
look at whether the CEO and Abroad Social foundation further develops the corporate
Money investor relationship undeniably when the CEO has extraordinary
independence in administration.
In the first place, territorial CEOs with quick marketization process have more
prominent independence in administration. The course of marketization is very
divergent in China (Fan Posse et al., 2011). The external economy and institutional
environment can significantly interfere in the decision-making of senior managers,
restrain the behavior of companies, and influence the role of talents (Liu Qing et al.,
2013). In the provinces with rapid marketization process, the government has less
intervention in the company, while the judiciary is more fair and the intermediary
agencies are better developed. Right now, the CEO faces less outer obstruction while
deciding and has extraordinary administration independence (Zhang Sanbao and
Zhang Zhixue, 2012). Thusly, this paper analyzes the impact of CEO Abroad Conduct
foundation on Money investor relations under the state of quick marketization
process.
Also, the idea of the value will influence the CEO's capacity to go with choices on the
organization. Contrasted and non-state-possessed ventures, state-claimed undertakings
are more dependent upon government mediation, and their inner frameworks
ordinarily have authoritative variety. CEO choices face more noteworthy government
pressure and less administration independence (Liu Guangqiang and Kong Gaowen,
2018). At the point when the CEO needs to make the executives changes in the
organization's Money investor relations, it could be dismissed by higher controllers.
In this way, in state-claimed endeavors, albeit the Abroad Social foundation brand of
CEOs causes them to have a superior mental premise of Money investor relations and
more grounded Money investor relationship the management capacity, the impact of
their Abroad Conduct foundation on Money investor relations will debilitate after the
genuine situation cycle and government mediation. Hence, this paper analyzes the
impact of CEO Abroad Conduct foundation on Money investor relations in
organizations with various value properties. In light of the above examination, this
paper will gauge the distinction of CEO the management independence by the
marketization cycle and the idea of corporate value, and lead bunch relapse of the
examples as per model (1).The specific grouping method is: ① marketization process.
According to the ranking of the marketization index of 2000-2009 provided by Fan
Gang (2011), the average ranking of the marketization index in the past 10 years was
found, and then grouped according to the median of the average ranking, and the
samples were divided into slow marketization process (slow) and fast marketization
process (fast).② nature of stock rights. According to the nature of the company's
equity, the sample is divided into state-owned enterprise group (soe) and non-state-
owned enterprise group (non-soe). Group regression results are shown in Tables 5 – 7.

Table 5-7 CEO Overseas Behavioral background and Finance investor relations
considering management autonomy
(1) (2) (3) (4)
process of marketalization nature of stock rights
slow fast non-soe soe
oversea 0.064 0.035 ** 0.031 ** 0.043
(1.58) (2.54) (2.42) (1.09)
size -0.021 -0.037 *** -0.028 *** -0.035 ***
(-1.17) (-4.77) (-3.20) (-3.02)
lev -0.169 ** -0.024 -0.024 -0.117 *
(-2.18) (-0.69) (-0.74) (-1.71)
listage -0.004 -0.009 *** -0.013 *** -0.002
(-1.38) (-7.49) (-9.54) (-1.11)
roa -0.016 0.250 ** -0.105 0.583 ***
(-0.06) (2.37) (-1.03) (2.92)
tobin -0.008 -0.012 *** -0.006 ** -0.022 ***
(-1.11) (-4.09) (-2.25) (-2.67)
fcf -0.001 -0.044 -0.071 ** -0.023

(-0.02) (-1.32) (-2.14) (-0.35)

top1hold -0.024 -0.062 -0.001 -0.107

(-0.24) (-1.54) (-0.03) (-1.35)

dua 0.011 0.018 * 0.018 ** 0.022

(0.37) (1.90) (1.97) (0.72)

manage 0.331 *** 0.065 *** 0.064 *** 1.089 ***
(4.35) (3.05) (3.28) (3.91)
soe -0.019 -0.045 **
(-0.55) (-2.45)
_cons 1.280 *** 1.718 *** 1.529 *** 1.575 ***
(3.44) (10.58) (8.45) (6.15)
 ind yes yes yes yes
year yes yes yes yes
r2_a 0.19 0.31 0.27 0.22

F 11.53 25.97 18.11 8.82

N 2041 8163 6858 3537

Segment (1) and (2) in Table 5-7 show the relapse results assembled by marketization
process. It tends to be seen that in segment (1) slow gathering, the CEO Abroad
Conduct foundation oversea coefficient isn't critical, while in section (2) quick
gathering, the oversea coefficient is huge at the importance level of 5%. This shows
that in districts with quick market process, CEO Abroad Social foundation greaterly
affects Money investor relations. Table 5-7 columns (3) and (4) show the regression
results by equity nature. It can be seen that in the column (3) non-soe group, the CEO
Overseas Behavioral background oversea coefficient was significantly positive at the
5% significance level, but in column (4) the soe group. This shows that in non-state-
owned enterprises, THE Overseas Behavioral background of the CEO has a
significant effect on the Finance investor relations, while in state-owned enterprises,
restricted by the flexibility of decision-making, the CEO Overseas Behavioral
background has a weak impact on the corporate Finance investor relations. Through
the two gatherings of relapse results, CEO Abroad Conduct foundation influence
Money investor relations is the reason of the CEO has more noteworthy
administration independence, Abroad Social foundation to CEO left a "mental brand"
and "capacity", notwithstanding, just the CEO of the limitations and imperatives are
hours, its image qualities can work, influence the organization choice of Money
investor relations. All in all, when the CEO has greater administration independence,
the CEO Abroad Conduct foundation further develops the corporate Money investor
relationship.
5.4.3 Group by company transparency

Hutton (2009) calls attention to that when organizations are less straightforward,
there is more space for leaders to oversee data. For organizations with low
straightforwardness, the level of data deviation is more serious. The engraving left by
Abroad Social foundation understands Money investor security and focus closer on
the foundation of long haul relationship with Money investors, which will work on the
straightforwardness of the organization, fortify the cooperation and correspondence
with Money investors, and further develop the Money investor relationship the
management of the organization. For companies with high transparency, which can
actively interact with Finance investors, the impact of CEO Overseas Behavioral
background on Finance investor relations is relatively mild. In other words, in the
case of low corporate transparency, the CEO's Overseas Behavioral background
greatly improves the corporate Finance investor relations. To test this instrument, this
paper utilizes the accompanying three factors to gauge the straightforwardness of the
organization: the quantity of examiners followed, the extent of institutional Money
investors held, and the size of review foundations.
To begin with, the quantity of investigators following. Investigator following can
essentially lessen the organization data unevenness, the more experts follow, the
higher the straightforwardness of the organization (Hong et al., 2000). As
professionals, in order to maintain their reputation, analysts will improve their
analysis and prediction accuracy as much as possible, dig deep into the company's
information, and improve the information content of the company's stock price
(Chang et al., 2006). Subsequently, this paper looks at the effect of CEO Abroad
Conduct foundation on Money investor relations in various expert following
circumstances.
Second, institutional Money investors hold shares. Institutional Money investors can
really manage the organization, decrease data lopsidedness, and make the
organization's objectives bound to expand investor esteem (Klein, 2000). Institutional
Money investors in admittance to no undeniable benefit of insider data, yet generally
a bigger stake, at times have higher democratic control, could in fact purchase the
organization, which can create good imperatives for directors, driving the
organization to more data revelation, increment straightforwardness (XiaoBinQing,
and so on, 2007). Subsequently, this paper analyzes the impact of CEO Abroad
Conduct foundation on Money investor relations in various institutional Money
investors.
Third, the size of the review establishments. In the review cycle, enormous scope
bookkeeping business have more inspiration and capacity to questionnaire down the
data not convenient or genuinely unveiled in the fiscal summaries, and precisely
reflect it through review assessments to shape compelling oversight of the
organization (Color, 1993). Subsequently, organizations that utilize huge reviewers
are more straightforward and less data hilter kilter with Money investors than those
evaluated by little bookkeeping business (Bushman and Smith, 2001). Consequently,
this paper analyzes the effect of CEO Abroad Conduct foundation on Money investor
relations under various sizes of review establishments.
In this paper, the examples were assembled by the over three corporate
straightforwardness factors and relapsed out independently as per model (1). The
particular gathering strategy is: ① Number of expert following. As per the middle
number of experts followed by all organizations in the detailing year, the example is
separated into modest number of examiners (less) and different number of examiners
(more); ② shareholding proportion of institutional Money investors. As per the
middle shareholding proportion of institutional Money investors of all organizations
in the report year, the example is separated into low shareholding proportion (low)
and high shareholding proportion of institutional Money investors (high); ③ review
foundation size. Alluding to Jiang Fuxiu et al. (2016), the size of the inspectors
utilized by the organization are the huge Four bookkeeping business. The "four"
bunches address the huge size of review organizations, while the non-"four" bunches
address the limited scale of review foundations. Bunch relapse results are displayed in
Tables 5-8.
Table 5-8 sections (1) and (2) show the relapse results by number of examiner
followed, you can see that in the segment (1) less gathering, the CEO Abroad Conduct
foundation oversea coefficient was essentially certain at the 5% importance level,
while the segment (2) model gathering was not altogether not the same as zero in the
oversea gathering. This recommends that the CEO's Abroad Social foundation further
develops Money investor relations when the quantity of experts is low. Table 5-8
sections (3) and (4) show the relapse consequences of shareholding by institutional
Money investors. In section (3) low gathering, the CEO Abroad Social foundation
oversea coefficient was critical positive at 1% importance level, while in segment (4)
high gathering, the oversea coefficient was not essentially not the same as nothing.
This proposes that the CEO's Abroad Social foundation greaterly affects Money
investor relations when institutional Money investors hold low.
Table 5-8 sections (5) and (6) show the relapse results by reviewer size. In section (5),
the CEO Abroad Social foundation oversea coefficient was fundamentally certain at
the 1% importance level, while in segment (6), the oversea coefficient was not
altogether not quite the same as nothing. This recommends that the CEO's Abroad
Conduct foundation greaterly affects Money investor relations when the examiner is
little.
Table 5-8 A CEO considering company transparency
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Number of analyst Share ratio of institutional Scale of Corporate Value

questionnaires Finance investors institutions

less more low high Not the "speaking

"four big" out
freely"
oversea 0.047 ** 0.026 0.046 *** 0.026 0.040 *** -0.054
(2.49) (1.61) (2.92) (1.48) (3.31) (-0.39)
size -0.041 -0.049 -0.038 -0.035 -0.028 -0.066 **
 *** *** *** *** ***
(-3.86) (-5.06) (-4.07) (-3.70) (-3.68) (-2.57)
lev -0.081 * -0.012 -0.089 ** -0.020 -0.066 ** 0.053
(-1.95) (-0.28) (-2.25) (-0.47) (-2.04) (0.25)
listage -0.008 -0.008 -0.007 -0.011 -0.010 -0.002
*** *** *** *** ***
(-5.47) (-5.15) (-5.05) (-7.13) (-8.68) (-0.28)
roa 0.001 0.059 0.020 0.303 ** 0.144 0.732
(0.00) (0.41) (0.18) (2.02) (1.47) (0.95)
tobin -0.018 -0.007 * -0.015 -0.010 -0.010 -0.021
*** *** *** ***
(-4.43) (-1.91) (-3.77) (-2.62) (-3.64) (-0.80)
fcf -0.067 -0.025 0.015 -0.087 ** -0.037 -0.325
(-1.47) (-0.61) (0.32) (-2.18) (-1.18) (-1.39)
top1hold -0.025 -0.074 -0.032 -0.081 -0.044 -0.321
(-0.51) (-1.49) (-0.71) (-1.55) (-1.15) (-1.60)
dua 0.021 0.018 0.016 0.022 * 0.020 ** 0.075
(1.64) (1.42) (1.39) (1.66) (2.19) (1.16)
manage 0.105 *** 0.066 ** 0.089 *** 0.101 *** 0.081 *** 0.250
(3.63) (2.44) (3.43) (3.47) (3.93) (1.18)
soe -0.069 -0.018 -0.072 -0.023 -0.043 -0.020
*** *** ***
(-3.35) (-0.84) (-3.74) (-1.12) (-2.69) (-0.21)
_cons 1.811 *** 1.967 *** 1.733 *** 1.670 *** 1.535 *** 2.249 ***
(8.01) (9.76) (8.86) (8.44) (9.54) (4.01)
ind Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
year Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
r2_a 0.26 0.31 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.35
F 25.12 17.71 24.25 21.83 34.51 2.07
N 5126 5269 5007 5165 9962 431
To sum up, through the group regression of the above three scenarios, it can be
concluded that in the case of low corporate transparency and high degree of
information asymmetry, the CEO Overseas Behavioral background plays a greater
role in promoting the Finance investor relationship of enterprises.

5.5. Robustness test

5.5.1 endogeneity test

Albeit the above relapse results confirm the speculation of this paper and give a proof
to further develop the corporate Money investor relations of the CEO Abroad Conduct
foundation, the model utilized in this paper might have endogenous issues: ①
Recorded organizations with great Money investor relationship the executives
typically have more essential vision, such undertakings are bound to recruit gifts with
wide vision and exceptional capacity, like supervisors with Abroad Social foundation,
may have opposite and causal; ② Organization Money investor relationship choices
are impacted by different imperceptible elements, and there might be missing factors.
This paper utilizes the instrumental variable strategy to control the impedance of
endogeneity on the examination results and work on the dependability of the research
study ends. Alluding to the investigations of Ang et al. (2014), Liu Guangqiang and
Kong Gaowen (2018), the device factors chosen in this paper are: starting around
1920, the quantity of Western teacher ministers set up in different territories of China
8. The reasoning for choosing the apparatus variable is as per the following:
From one perspective, this variable will influence the organization to enlist CEO with
Abroad Conduct foundation, the importance of the apparatus variable: ①, individuals
of the Christian qualities, more open doors, contact with western culture, bound to
travel to another country later on, when these understudies, bound to get back to the
territory and utilized by nearby organizations. ② On the grounds that the western
culture, stoneware, will draw in gifts with Abroad Social foundation to work or live,
organizations situated in these regions are bound to employ abroad abilities. Then
again, this instrumental variable comes from the authentic information of quite a
while back. Aside from the circuitous impact of the organization's Money investor
relations choice through the CEO of returnees, there could be no alternate method for
partner with the reliant variable, which is in accordance with the exogenous idea of
the instrumental variable. Based on the above examination, the instrument variable
instrument was added to test the review ends utilizing the two-stage least squares
strategy, and the relapse results are displayed in Table 5-9.
Table 5-9 section (1) shows the principal phase of instrumental variable relapse. It
very well may be seen that the CEO Abroad Conduct foundation oversea as the reliant
variable, instrumental variable instrument as free factor relapse, instrument coefficient
is 0.002, and huge at the 1% importance level, demonstrating that the more number of
Christian college area, the more the nearby organization CEO have Abroad Social
foundation, in accordance with assumptions. Table 5-9 sections (2) shows the second
period of the coefficient of CEO Abroad Social foundation oversea remaining parts
fundamentally certain at the 1% importance level. It shows that in the wake of
controlling the expected endogenous issues, the CEO Abroad Social foundation still
altogether further develops the corporate Money investor relations. We can likewise
see from Table 5-9 segments (2) that the Cragg-Donald Wald F esteem is 23.85, which
dismissed the supposition of powerless instrumental factors, demonstrating the
legitimacy of the instrumental factors chosen in this paper. Likewise, to More affirm
the CEO Abroad Social foundation oversea as an endogenous variable, a husman-test
was additionally led, and the experimental outcomes showed that the chi2 esteem was
214.80, which essentially dismissed the invalid speculation of "all logical factors are
exogenous" at the 1% importance level, which affirmed the endogenous issue and the
utilization of the instrumental variable technique was sensible.
Table 5-9 Results of CEO Overseas Behavioral background and Finance investor
relations tool variable regression
(1) (2)
First-Stage Second-Stage
oversea IR
instrument 0.002 ***
(5.18)
oversea 0.995 ***
(3.30)
size 0.012 *** -0.047 ***
(3.34) (-7.37)
lev -0.041 ** 0.011
(-2.21) (0.35)
listage -0.002 *** -0.006 ***
(-4.08) (-5.15)
roa -0.108 0.363 ***
(-1.45) (3.54)
tobin 0.013 *** -0.024 ***
(5.43) (-4.92)
fcf 0.026 -0.074 *
(0.92) (-1.77)
top1hold -0.013 -0.034
(-0.61) (-1.14)
dua 0.013 * 0.003
(1.87) (0.24)
manage -0.059 *** 0.157 ***

(-2.96) (5.07)
soe -0.041 *** -0.002
 (-5.69) (-0.12)
_cons -0.233 *** 1.757 ***

(-2.95) (13.44)
ind Yes Yes
year Yes Yes
r2_a 0.03
F 10.89 57.92
Cragg-DonaldWald F 23.85
N 10046 10046

5.5.2 Replace the Finance investor relations measurement method

In the primary relapse of this paper, the reaction rate (IR) of the Money investor
intelligent stage for Money investor relations is utilized to gauge the Money investor
relations of recorded organizations. To guarantee the dependability of the above
research ends, this paper develops two new factors to gauge the corporate Money
investor relations by alluding to the current writing, as the elective variable of IR, to
test the strength of the past paper.
(1) The typical yearly number of answer words on the intelligent stage is lmean _
words
Jiang Yanhui and Zheng Jiaer (2017) brought up that, somewhat, the recorded
organization in the intelligent stage, the more word number, the more prominent how
much data to Fund investors, the more can work on the nature of the communication,
make speculation, see the organization of the serious and mindful, lay out a decent
picture of the organization, improve the fulfillment of the organization Money
investor relations the executives. Gong Guangming and Yang Lu (2018) likewise
utilize the quantity of characters of the organization answered by the administration
on the intuitive stage to quantify the Money investor relationship of the organization.
The more characters of the answer, the better the organization's response, the higher
the nature of intelligent correspondence. In view of this, this paper estimates the
Money investor relationship of the organization by the normal yearly number of
answers of the organization lmean _ words. The more the quantity of answers, the
more adequate and point by point the substance, the higher the collaboration and
correspondence quality between the organization and Money investors, and the better
the Money investor relationship among:

(2) The average annual reply and timeliness of the interactive platform is lmean _ day
The study of Zhang Jixun and Han Dongmei (2015) shows that the response time of
listed companies on the interactive platform reflects the initiative of the company's
Finance investor relationship management. The more timely the response is, the
stronger the initiative of Finance investor relationship management is. Quan Xiaofeng
et al. (2016) also believe that the response speed of listed companies to Finance
investors' questions can reflect the level of Finance investor relations management.
Therefore, in this paper, the response timeliness is measured by the average annual
response days of the company on the interactive platform. This index is a negative
indicator. The smaller lmean _ day is, the more timely the company replies.among:

When these two variables were used as new proxy variables for Finance investor
relations, and the CEO Overseas Behavioral background was the independent
variable, the regression was performed again according to model (1). The results are
shown in Table 5-10. In Table 5-10, in columns (1), The Overseas Behavioral
background oversea coefficient of the CEO was 0.082, Significant at the 1%
significance level, When indicating that the CEO has an Overseas Behavioral
background, The company replies to more words on the interactive platform, With a
richer content, Greater amount of information delivered to Finance investors,
Corporate and stronger management of Finance investor relations, Consistent with the
expectations; In Table 5-10, in columns (2), The coefficient of the CEO Abroad
Conduct foundation oversea is-0.077, Was critical at the 5% importance level,
Demonstrate the way that the CEO Abroad Social foundation can fundamentally
lessen the organization's reaction time on the intelligent stage, All the more opportune
reactions to inquiries from Money investors, High Money investor relations the
executives drive, Predictable with the past end. To summarize, the quantity of answer
words and practicality of recorded organizations on the intuitive stage as intermediary
factors of Money investor relations can in any case demonstrate the speculation of
research study, and the finish of this paper is solid.

Table 5-10 successor of Finance investor Relations

(1) (2)
lmean_words lmean_day
oversea 0.082 *** -0.077 **
(3.35) (-1.98)
size 0.046 *** 0.130 ***
(4.87) (8.02)

lev -0.078 * -0.138 *

(-1.75) (-1.83)
listage -0.004 *** 0.010 ***
(-2.95) (3.72)
roa -0.261 * -0.193
 (-1.85) (-0.77)
tobin -0.003 0.026 ***
(-0.77) (3.50)
fcf -0.035 0.144 *
(-0.83) (1.72)
top1hold 0.144 *** 0.009
(2.80) (0.10)
dua -0.028 * 0.036
(-1.90) (1.54)
manage 0.084 ** -0.129 **
(2.12) (-2.04)
soe 0.007 0.058 *
(0.38) (1.66)
_cons 3.201 *** -1.437 ***
(15.74) (-4.14)
ind Yes Yes
year Yes Yes
r2_a 0.06 0.16
F 7.76 15.29
N 10369 10394

5.5.3 Replace the control variables

To make the outcomes more strong, the accompanying changes to the control factors:
(1) More incorporate CEO attributes, including: ① CEO age. Take the age of the
CEO in the detailing year.② CEO sex orientation, this variable is a fake variable, and
relegates a worth of 1 when the CEO is male, and 0 in any case. ③ CEO, instructive
level edu. The worth of specialized auxiliary everyday schedule is 1,2, junior school,
3,4,5,6,9 in different structures, and MBA or EMBA is 7.
(2) More control the common fixed impact and take out the effect of the monetary
advancement contrasts in the region where the organization is found.
(3) Keep other control factors unaltered, supplant the benefit of ROA to gauge the
productivity of the organization, and supplant the development rate development
rather than tobin to quantify the development of the organization. The relapse results
are displayed in Table 5-11.
Table 5-11 Results of regression of successor control variables
(1) (2) (3)
IR IR IR
age -0.001 **
(-2.04)
gender -0.006
(-0.35)
edu 0.006 **
(1.97)
oversea 0.027 ** 0.037 *** 0.035 ***
(2.12) (2.97) (2.78)
size -0.041 *** -0.036 *** -0.024 ***
(-5.64) (-5.29) (-3.81)
lev -0.033 -0.053 * -0.069 **
(-1.05) (-1.71) (-2.26)
listage -0.006 *** -0.008 *** -0.009 ***
(-5.41) (-7.76) (-8.18)
roa 0.240 ** 0.190 **
(2.41) (2.03)
tobin -0.011 *** -0.011 ***
(-4.09) (-4.11)
fcf -0.052 * -0.028 -0.021
 (-1.74) (-0.94) (-0.71)
top1hold -0.033 -0.050 -0.056
(-0.91) (-1.38) (-1.50)
dua 0.017 * 0.020 ** 0.017 *
(1.84) (2.14) (1.84)
manage 0.069 *** 0.074 *** 0.087 ***
(3.53) (3.52) (4.31)
soe -0.046 *** -0.047 *** -0.045 ***
(-2.83) (-2.98) (-2.87)
roe 0.012
(0.26)
growth 0.017 **
(2.53)

_cons 1.848 *** 1.683 *** 1.422 ***

(11.72) (11.89) (10.83)
ind Yes Yes Yes
year Yes Yes Yes
prov No Yes No
r2_a 0.26 0.32 0.28
F 19.18 33.24 36.14
N 8802 10396 10748

Table 5-11 section (1) shows the relapse results after expansion of CEO age,
orientation, training level, The outcomes show that the CEO Abroad Social
foundation oversea coefficient is still fundamentally sure, from this, Whether to
control the CEO and Individual Capital Design Hypothesis qualities don't influence
the CEO's Abroad Conduct foundation in advancing Money investor relations; Table
5-11 segments (2) shows the consequences of the relapse after More controlling for
common fixed impacts, have the option to see, Subsequent to barring the monetary
improvement contrasts in the area where the organization is found, The research study
ends continue as before; Table 5-11 section (3) shows the relapse results after
substitution of roa and tobin, The oversea coefficient was still essentially certain at the
importance level of 1%, The review ends were powerful.
 6. Study conclusions, recommendations, and limitations

6.1 Study Conclusion

This paper mainly starts from the theory of senior echelon, Imprinting Theory and the
theory of management power, and discusses the influence of CEO Overseas
Behavioral background on corporate Finance investor relations. After analyzing the
data of a-share non-financial listed companies in 2009-2018, the following
conclusions are drawn:
(1) The Overseas Behavioral background of the CEO can significantly improve the
Finance investor relations of the company. The end is as yet substantial in the wake of
controlling the expected endogenous issues, changing the Money investor relations
organization factors, Really consolidating the Individual Capital Design Hypothesis
attributes of the CEO, and controlling the commonplace fixed impacts. The
explanation is that Abroad Social foundation will leave the CEO "mental brand" and
"capacity", improve the CEO of the comprehension of Money investor relations and
the executives capacity, when they get back, will become familiar with the high level
Money investor relations hypothesis information, the management insight to
organization direction, to focus harder on the straightforward culture, fortify
correspondence and communication with Money investors, and bound to
appropriately deal with the Money investor relations the management cycle of a
succession of complicated issues.
(2) This paper More CEO Abroad Conduct foundation into abroad learning
foundation and abroad work foundation, relapse found abroad work foundation can
essentially further develop the Money investor relations, and abroad learning
foundation on Money investor relations isn't critical, the imaginable explanation is
that contrasted and abroad opportunity for growth, had worked in abroad CEO can
really engaged with the capital market practice, contact with neighborhood
regulations and guidelines, strategy framework, comprehend the front of Money
investor relations hypothesis and the executives practice, left "brand" and "capacity"
is more self-evident, in the genuine choice with abroad more combination.
(3) When the CEO has a more noteworthy independence in administration, the CEO's
Abroad Social foundation enormously further develops the corporate Money investor
relationship. This paper estimates the distinction of the administration independence
of the CEO by utilizing the marketization cycle and the organization's value nature,
and finds that the Abroad Social foundation of the CEO essentially further develops
the Money investor relationship in the areas with quick marketization process and
non-state-possessed ventures, while in the locales with slow marketization cycle and
state-claimed undertakings, the effect on the Money investor relationship isn't critical.
The explanation might be that the Abroad Conduct foundation has left a "mental
engraving" and a "capacity engrave" on the CEO. Notwithstanding, just when the
limitations and requirements looked by the CEO are little can its image qualities
assume a part and influence the choice of Money investor relations.
(4) On account of low straightforwardness and serious level of data deviation, the
Abroad Conduct foundation of the CEO assumes a larger part in advancing the
Money investor relationship of the organization. This paper utilizes the examiner
following number, institutional Money investors property and review size three
factors measure organization straightforwardness, found that CEO Abroad Conduct
foundation in the expert following less, institutional Money investors ownerships,
evaluators size hours fundamentally further develop Money investor relations, and in
the investigator following number, institutional Money investors holding high, review
scale, the speculation relationship isn't critical, shows that in the organization
straightforwardness is low, Abroad Social foundation to CEO, leaving the "mental
brand" and "capacity" can work all the more really.
From the above end, it very well may be realized that the Abroad Social foundation of
the CEO can fundamentally further develop the Money investor relations of the
organization, which is of extraordinary importance to advance the improvement of
Money investor relations in China's capital market. This paper not just enhances the
examination consequences of the impacting elements of corporate Money investor
relations, yet additionally features the significance of CEO heterogeneity to corporate
choice according to the viewpoint of the Individual Capital Construction Hypothesis
attributes of the CEO.

6.2 Policy recommendations

The examination of this paper demonstrates the way that Chinese recorded
organizations can streamline corporate administration and improve Money investor
relations by recruiting CEOs with Abroad Social foundations. Great Money investor
relations can diminish the data imbalance, lessen the expense of supporting, right
stock worth market deviation, further develop the organization believability and stable
market, hold, as of now, the recorded organization Money investor relations the
management is still in its earliest stages, all degrees of government, on, city
organizations, controllers ought to put forth joint attempts to advance the
improvement of our capital market Money investor relations the executives
framework and awesome. Explicitly talking, the paper advances the accompanying
strategy ideas:
(1) The focal and neighborhood states can properly acquaint relating ability
presentation approaches with assistance homegrown undertakings draw in abroad
gifts. The finish of this paper shows that the CEO Abroad Social foundation has
tremendous impact to organization Money investor relations, thusly, to draw in more
ability, speed up the Money investor relations framework in China, notwithstanding,
the public authority ought to effectively as, the nearby government ought to likewise
change measures to neighborhood conditions, stay away from "one size fits all" and
aimlessly follow, make match what is happening in the area, for abroad ability
presentation strategy. Moreover, unique abroad encounters contrastingly affect Money
investor relations. While planning ability presentation approaches, the kinds of abroad
gifts ought to be completely thought of, and separated arrangements ought to be
executed for various kinds of abroad abilities, to all the more likely advance the
improvement of Money investor relations in China and reinforce the assurance of
Money investors in China's capital market.
(2) The Organization will effectively impart and associate with Money investors and
reinforce the Money investor relationship the executives. In this paper, observed that
Money investor relations is still in its earliest stages, there are as yet many
organization Money investor security, powerless cognizance, don't focus on Money
investor sentiments and issues, bad at utilizing network way into Money investor
relations, line the management, accordingly, the recorded organization ought to
completely focus on the organization Money investor relations, reinforce the
collaboration with Money investors, yet additionally can decide to recruit CEO with
Abroad Conduct foundation, depend on abroad CEO Money investor relations more
grounded mental premise and further developed Money investor relations the
executives experience, assist organizations with further developing Money investor
relations. What's more, the organization can likewise choose CEOs to work or
concentrate abroad, get in close contact with the Money investor relations framework
in abroad evolved capital business sectors, gain proficiency with the reasonable
experience of abroad Money investor relations, and assist the organization with
further developing the Money investor relationship the management rapidly and
productively.
(3) The administrative researchers ought to More work on the guidelines on the
Money investor relationship the executives of recorded organizations. To reinforce the
security of Money investors in China's capital market, Administrative researchers
ought to More further develop the correspondence component of recorded
organizations, Promoter recorded organizations to effectively keep up with great
correspondence and collaboration with Money investors, Guide recorded
organizations to utilize network channels to oversee Money investor relations, Update
the organization site data ideal, Convenient answer inquiries from Money investors on
the intuitive stage, Normalize the administration rules of intelligent stages, Construct,
" Money investors will ask, The organization will reply " a decent correspondence
environment, Taking the answer nature of the recorded organizations on the intelligent
stage as one of the assessment bases for the organization's data revelation, The
reaction pace of recorded organizations on the intelligent stage is too low,
Administrative researchers might give letters of request to the organization, Fortify its
oversight, More safeguard Money investors.

6.3 Study Limitations

This paper lays out a different direct relapse model to concentrate because of CEO
Abroad Social foundation on the Money investor relations of Chinese undertakings
exactly. Be that as it may, because of the impediment of individual examination level,
this paper might have the accompanying research study restrictions and regions to be
moved along:
(1) Better Money investor relations organization factors should be found. This article
takes on the reaction pace of recorded organizations in the intelligent stage as the
researcher variable of big business Money investor relations, lastly utilizing the
answer of the intelligent stage, the reaction as the Money investor relations measure
security, albeit the intuitive correspondence is the fundamental substance of Money
investor relations, network stage is the primary channel of correspondence between
recorded organizations and Money investors, the three researcher factors somewhat
mirror the endeavor Money investor relations the management drive and the
executives level. Be that as it may, the idea of Money investor relations is challenging
to straightforwardly portray and gauge, as Hamid (2003), the hypothetical research
study on Money investor relations is less, there is no extraordinary hypothesis to make
sense of Money investor relations, the proportion of Money investor relations no
brought together, definitive norm, researchers in the assessment of Money investor
relations content. The manner in which the organization does Fund investor relations
exercises includes the organization intuitive stage, yet in addition the disconnected
channels and other data revelation techniques, so the office variable actually has
specific constraints. With the extending of the investigation of Money investor
relations, it ought to have the option to see as a superior and reasonable for China's
capital market.
(2) The ecological force of the Money investor relations framework in the CEO's
Abroad Social foundation source isn't thought of. Chen Dongjie (2018) brought up
that the improvement of Money investor relations relies upon the spread of cutting
edge institutional climate to China. Hypothetically talking, the wellspring of the
CEO's Abroad Conduct foundation will influence the strength of this dispersion. The
more fostered the capital market in the home where the CEO has worked or
examined, the more grounded the institutional climate of Money investor relations,
and the more delicate the Money investor relations of neighborhood ventures to the
Abroad Social foundation of the CEO. Nonetheless, because of the information
impediment, this paper neglected to get the source data of the CEO's Abroad Conduct
foundation, so the Abroad Conduct foundation of the CEOs from various nations was
not More researched.
 Reference documentation

[1] Chen Ya. Board of directors characteristics, Finance investor relations

management and empirical analysis of company value [J]. Accounting
communication, 2016 (18): 61-65.
[2] Chen Dongjie, Chen Jia, Liu Li. Overseas directors and Finance investor relations
—— Based on the analysis of A-share listed companies from 2000 to 2012 [J].
Economic Science, 2018 (04): 103-116.
[3] Huang Qunhui. Theoretical Logic, Strategic Connotation, and Policy System of
the New Development Pattern: From the Perspective of Economic Modernization [J].
Economic Research, 2021, 56 (4): 4-23
[4] Dai Yun hao, Kong Dongmin. Whether the overseas experience of CEOs can
improve the investment efficiency of enterprises? [J]. World Economy, 2017 (1):
168192.
[5] Chen Qi, Feng Yuqiang, Liu Luning. Research on the Process of Strategic
Flexibility Promoting Enterprise Strategic Change from the Perspective of Duality [J].
Management Review, 2018, 30 (9): 275-291
[6] Du Yong, Xie Jin, Chen Jianying. The Financial background of the CEO and the
financialization of real enterprises [J]. Industrial Economy of China, 2019 (05): 136-
154.
[7] Zhang Ming, Lan Hailin, Chen Weihong, et al. Different paths lead to different
outcomes: a study on the antecedent configuration and performance of strategic
change [J]. Management World, 2020, 36 (9): 168-186
[8] Bednar M K，Boivie S，Prince N R.Burr under the saddle：how media coverage
influences strategic change [J].Organization Science，2013，24(3)：910-925.
[9] Feng Yanjie, Chen Min, You Ben. Offline Finance investor relations activities and
Stock Market Performance of Listed Companies —— Based on the Information of
Shenzhen Stock Exchange [J]. Shanghai Finance, 2019 (05): 46-54.
[10] Gao Chunyan. Review and Outlook on Finance investor Relations Research [J].
Modern Management Science, 2016 (02): 105-108.
[11] Du Yong, Zhang Huan, Chen Jianying. CEO Overseas experience and Corporate
earnings management [J]. Accounting Research, 2018,2:27-33.
[12] Gong Guangming, Yang Lu. Can good communication reduce the risk of a stock
price crash?[J]. Friends of the Accounting, 2018 (14): 30-36.
[13] Xue Youzhi, Zhou Jie, Chu Xu. Conceptual Framework of Enterprise Strategic
Transformation: Connotation, Path, and Model [J]. Economic Management, 2012, 34
(7): 39-48
[14] Jiang Fuxiu, Shi Beibei, Ma Yun Biao. Financial experience and corporate
financing constraints of information publishers [J]. Economic Research, 2016,51 (06):
83-97.
[15] Dai Yunhao, Kong Dongmin. Can overseas experience of executives improve
investment efficiency of enterprises [J]. World Economy, 2017, 40 (1): 168-192
[16] Li Weining, Li Li. Study on the relationship between TMT heterogeneity,
strategic change and performance improvement —— Based on data from non-
diversified enterprises with declining performance [J]. Management Science in China,
2015,23 (06): 153-161.
[17] Fan Gang, Wang Xiaolu, Zhu Hengpeng. China Market Index —— 2011 annual
report of regional marketization relative process [J]. Economic Science Press, 2011.
[18] Li Zhibin. Internal control, equity concentration and Finance investor Relations
Management —— Evidence from the Finance investor Relations Survey of A-share
listed companies [J]. Accounting Research, 2013 (12): 72-78 + 97.
[19] Jiang Yanhui, Zheng Jia'er. Research on the impact of new media information
disclosure on the stock market —— Evidence from the "interactive easy" platform
[J]. Friends of the Accounting, 2017 (8): 48-55.
[20] Liu Fengchao, Mo Jiaxin, Ma Rongkang. Study on the influence of Overseas
Behavioral background on enterprise innovation performance [J]. Management
Review, 2017,29 (7): 135-147.
[21] Liu Qing, Zhang Chao, Lu Ruosi, et al. Whether the business performance of
"returnees" is better: Evidence from Chinese private enterprises [J]. The World
Economy, 2013 (12): 70-89.
[22] Liu Guangqiang, Kong owen. Whether the overseas experience of CEOs raises
the salary gap [J]. Manage World, 2018,34 (08): 130-142.
[23] Luo Siping, Yu Yongda. Technology transfer, "Returnees" and enterprise
technology innovation —— Based on empirical research on China's photovoltaic
industry [J]. Managing the World, 2012,11:124-132.
[24] Gu Wenjun. Finance investor Relations Management of Listed Companies in
China: Conactors and Improvement [J]. Business Research, 2004 (09): 44-46.
[25] Quan Xiaofeng, Xiao Binqing, Wu Shinong. Can Finance investor relations
management stabilize the market?—— A comprehensive survey based on the Finance
investor relationship management of A-share listed companies [J]. Management
World, 2016 (01): 139-152 + 188.
[26] Song Jianbo, Wen Wen, Wang Dehong. Can overseas executives promote
corporate risk taking —— empirical evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies
[J]. Finance and Trade Economy, 2017,38 (12): 111-126.
[27] Song Lin, Zhang Dan. Study on the synergistic influence of executive political
correlation and Overseas Behavioral background on the innovation ability of
enterprises [J]. Contemporary Economic Science, 2019,41 (06): 98-107.
[28] Lin Bin, Xin Qingquan, Yang Deming, Chen Nian. Analysis of Finance investor
Relations Management and its influencing Factors —— Based on the empirical test of
Shenzhen listed companies [J]. Accounting Research, 2005 (09): 32-38 + 95-96.
[29] Wang Bing, Pan Yan. Internal control and company new media disclosure
behavior —— based on the empirical test of "interaction easy" of Shenzhen Stock
Exchange [J]. Internal Corporate Value of China, 2017 (05): 36-39.
[30] Wang Tiejun. Research on the motivation and influence of listed companies
participating in network interaction [J / OL]. Economics and Management, 2022 (02):
32-42 [2020-03-12].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/13.1032.f.202
00228.1032.010.html.
[31] Wang Xueli, Ma Lin, Wang Yanli. The impact of the functional background of
the senior management team on enterprise performance: Take the listed companies in
China's information technology industry as an example [J]. Nankai Management
Review, 2013,16 (04): 80-93.
[32] Wen Wen, Song Jianbo. Executive Overseas Behavioral background and
corporate social responsibility [J]. Management Science, 2017,30 (02): 119-131.
[33] Wu Wenfeng, Wu Charge, Liu Xiaowei. The government background and
corporate value of CEOs of private listed companies in China [J]. Economic
Research, 2008 (07): 130-141.
[34] Wang Xia, Ye Xingxing. Changes in National Governance and Corporate
Strategic Change: The Regulatory Effect of CEO Power and Openness Characteristics
[J]. Scientific Research Management, 2019, 40 (12): 234-242
[35] Lian Yanling, He Xiaogang, Gao Hao. Performance Expectation Gap and
Corporate Strategic Adjustment: An Empirical Study Based on Chinese Listed
Companies [J]. Management World, 2014 (11): 119-132
[36] Yunjiang, Wang Wenjing. Organizational Memory, Improvisation Ability, and
Strategic Change [J]. Nankai Management Review, 2015, 18 (4): 36-46
[37] Bai Jingkun, Li Hongyan, Qu Lingxia. How the Heterogeneity of Executive
Teams in Listed Companies in a Dynamic Environment Affects Strategic Change: An
Empirical Analysis Based on Data from Small and Medium sized Enterprise Board
Listed Companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen [J]. Macroeconomic Research, 2017 (2):
157-168
[38]Zhu Q，Hu S，Shen W.Why do some insider CEOs make more strategic changes
than others? the impact of prior board experience on new CEO insiderness
[J].Strategic Management Journal，2020，41(10)：1933-1951.
[39] Yao Zhenhua, Sun Haifa. The relationship between the characteristics of
executive team composition, communication frequency and organizational
performance [J]. Soft Science, 2011,25 (06): 64-68 + 75.
[40] Zhang Jixun, Han Dongmei. The timeliness and clarity of management reply and
Finance investor investment decision in the network interactive platform
communication —— an experimental evidence [J]. Management Review, 2015,27
(10): 70-83.
[41] Feng Yanjie, Xu Bo. Overview and Outlook of Finance investor relationship
function research —— Based on the balanced scorecard framework [J]. Journal of
Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, 2014,21 (02): 43-57.
[42] Zhang Rao. Whether the Overseas Behavioral background of CEOs helps
enterprises to make foreign direct investment [J]. Macroeconomic Research, 2015 (6):
107-116.
[43] Zhang Sanbao, Zhang Zhixue. Regional institutional differences, CEO
management autonomy and enterprise risk taking —— Evidence of high-tech
industries in 30 provinces of China [J]. Manage World, 2012 (04): 101-114 + 188.
[44] Zhao Ying. An Empirical Study on the Level of Finance investor Relations of
Listed Companies in China [J]. Economic Management, 2009,31 (2): 70-77.
[45] The Special Section of the Chinese Continuing Development Committee.
Chinese Christian Survey Data from 1901-1920 [M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences
Press.1987.
[46] Zhang Ping. Research on the relationship between the heterogeneity of senior
management team and enterprise performance [J]. Management Review, 2006,18 (5):
5460.
[47] Zhou Kai-Tang, Ma Zhiming, Wu Liansheng. CEO academic experience and
corporate debt financing costs [J]. Economic Research, 2017,52 (07): 169-183.
[48] Zhu Kong Lai, Li Jing Jing. Composite evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Chinese stock market [J]. Mathematical Statistics and Management, 2013,32 (01):
145-154.
[49]Ang J S, Cheng Y, Wu C.Does enforcement of intellectual property rights matter
in China?Evidence from financing and investment choices in the high-tech
industry[J].Review of Economics and Statistics, 2014, 96(2): 332-348.
[50]Argenti P A, Howell R A, Beck K A.The strategic communication
imperative[J].MIT Sloan management review, 2005, 46(3): 83.
[51]Azoulay P, Liu C C, Stuart T E.Social influence given (partially) deliberate
matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs[J].American
Journal of Sociology, 2017, 122(4): 1223-1271.
[52]Bain B.P.The role of the top management team tenure on corporate social
performance and its impact on profitability[D].Toronto: University of Guelph,2015.
[53]Bebchuk L A, Fried J M.Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem[J].Cepr
Discussion Papers,2003,17(3):71-92.
[54] Dong Jing, Deng Haoran. Chairman's Military Background, Management
Autonomy, and Strategic Change: Evidence from A-share Listed Companies [J].
Journal of Management Engineering, 2021, 35 (4): 29-39
[55]Hambrick D C，Mason P A.Upper echelons：the organization as a reflection of
its top managers [J].Academy of Management Review，1984，9(2)：193-206.
[56]Filatotchev I ， Liu X ， Buck T ， et al.The export orientation and export
performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets ： the effects of
knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs [J].Journal of International Business
Studies，2009，40(6)：1005-1021.
[57] Du Yong, Zhang Huan, Chen Jianying. CEO's Overseas Experience and
Enterprise Earnings Management [J]. Accounting Research, 2018 (2): 27-33
[58] Chen Yi'an, Yang Heqing. Empirical study on the impact of returnee return on
China's technological progress [J]. Economic Management, 2013, 35 (4): 82-93
[59] Zhang Fanghua, Lin Renfang, Chen Jin. Social Capital and tacit knowledge of
Enterprises [J]. Research and Development Management, 2003 (6): 67-72
[60] Li Ping, Xu Jiayun. Research on the Technology Diffusion Effect of International
Intellectual Reflux: An Empirical Analysis Based on Regional Differences and
Threshold Regression in China [J]. Economics (Quarterly), 2011, 10 (3): 935-964
[61] Dai Jiansheng, Niu Clean. decision analysis of Capital Constrained Retailers'
Order, Promotion and Financing Collaboration [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering,
2021, 36 (2): 171-189
[62]Carpenter M A, Fredrickson J W.Top management teams, global strategic posture,
and the moderating role of uncertainty[J].Academy of Management journal, 2001,
44(3): 533-545.
[63]Carter M E, Franco F, Gine M.Executive gender pay gaps: The roles of female
risk aversion and board representation[J].Contemporary Accounting Research, 2017,
34(2): 1232-1264.
[64]Chang X, Dasgupta S, Hilary G.Analyst coverage and financing decisions[J].The
Journal of Finance, 2006, 61(6): 3009-3048
[65]Chattopadhyay P, Glick W H, Miller C C, et al.Determinants of executive beliefs:
Comparing functional conditioning and social influence[J].Strategic management
journal, 1999, 20(8): 763-790.
[66]Cho C H, Jung J H, Kwak B, et al.Professors on the board: Do they contribute to
society outside the classroom?[J].Journal of Business ethics, 2017, 141(2): 393-409.
[67]Conger M.How a comprehensive IR program pays off: an Finance investor
relations veteran analyzes the advantages of taking a comprehensive and proactive
approach to Finance investor outreach[J].Financial Executive, 2004, 20(1): 30-35.
[68]Conyon M J, Haß L H, Vergauwe S, et al.Foreign experience and CEO
compensation[J].Journal of Corporate Finance, 2019, 57: 102-121.
[69]Coyne K R, Witter J W.Taking the Mystery Out of Finance investor
Behavior[J].Harvard Business Review, 2002, 80(9): 68-78.
[70]Craven B M, Marston C L.Finance investor relations and corporate governance in
large UK companies[J].Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1997, 5(3):
137-151.
[71]Daily,C.M, Certo,S.T, Dalton,D.R.International Experience in the Executive
Suite: The Path to Prosperity?[J] Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(4):515-
523.
[72]Dalton D R, Kesner I F.Organizational performance as an antecedent of
inside/outside CEO executive succession: An empirical assessment[J].Academy of
management Journal, 1985, 28(4): 749-762.
[73]Dokko G, Wilk S L, Rothbard N P.Unpacking prior experience: How career
history affects job performance[J].Organization Science, 2009, 20(1): 51-68.
[74]Duan T, Hou W.The curse of returnee CEOs[J].Unpublished Working Paper,
2015.
[75]Dye R A.Corporate Valueing standards, legal liability, and Corporate Valueor
wealth[J].Journal of political Economy, 1993, 101(5): 887-914.
[76]Eng L L, Mak Y T.Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure[J].Journal of
accounting and public policy, 2003, 22(4): 325-345.
[77]Ettredge M, Richardson V J, Scholz S.The presentation of financial information at
corporate Web sites[J].International Journal of Accounting Information Systems,
2001, 2(3): 149-168.
[78]Sharfman M P，Wolf G，Chase R B，et al.Antecedents of organizational slack
[J].Academy of Management Review，1988，13(4)：601-614.
[79]Singh J V.Performance ， slack ， and risk taking in organizational decision
making [J].Academy of Management Journal，1986，29(3)：562-585.
[80]Tang J ， Crossan M ， Rowe W G.Dominant CEO ， deviant strategy ， and
extreme performance ： the moderating role of a powerful board [J].Journal of
Management Studies，2011，48(11)：153-178.
[81]Forker J J.Corporate governance and disclosure quality[J].Accounting and
Business research, 1992, 22(86): 111-124.
[82]Francis B, Hasan I, Wu Q.Professors in the boardroom and their impact on
corporate governance and firm performance[J].Financial management, 2015,44(3):
547-581.
[83]Giannetti M, Liao G, Yu X.The brain gain of corporate boards: Evidence from
China[J].The Journal of Finance, 2015, 70(4): 1629-1682.
[84]Greenwood R, Díaz A M, Li S X, et al.The multiplicity of institutional logics and
the heterogeneity of organizational responses[J].Organization science, 2010, 21(2):
521-539.
[85]Hall R.The strategic analysis of intangible resources[J].Strategic management
journal, 1992, 13(2): 135-144.
[86]Hambrick D C, Finkelstein S.Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar
views of organizational outcomes[J].Research in organizational behavior, 1987.
[87]Hambrick D C, Mason P A.Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its
top managers[J].Academy of management review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206.
[88]Hamid F Z A, Salleh M S M, Mohd'Atef Md Yusof.Finance investor Relations in
Developing Countries: A Disclosure Strategy[M].Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia,
2003.
[89]Haynes K T, Hillman A.The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic
change[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(11): 1145-1163.
[90]Hedlin P.The Internet as a vehicle for Finance investor relations: the Swedish
case[J].European Accounting Review, 1999, 8(2): 373-381.
[91]Hong H, Lim T, Stein J C.Bad news travels slowly: Size, analyst coverage, and
the profitability of momentum strategies[J].The Journal of Finance, 2000, 55(1): 265-
295.
[92]Hutton A P, Marcus A J, Tehranian H.Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash
risk[J].Journal of financial Economics, 2009, 94(1): 67-86.
[93]Jensen M C, Meckling W.H.(1976)[J].Theory of the firm: managerial behavior,
agency costs and ownership structure En: Journal of Finance Economics, 1976, 3.
[94]Jones D.Best practices for online annual reports.(Finance investor Relations)
[J].Financial Executive, 2003, 19(2): 29-32.
[95]Klein A.Corporate Value Committee， Board of Director Characteristics， and
Earnings Management ［ J ］ .Journal of Accounting & Economics ， 2000 ，
33(3):375-400.
[96]Lam K C K, McGuinness P B, Vieito J P.CEO gender, executive compensation
and firm performance in Chinese ‐ listed enterprises[J].Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,
2013, 21(1): 1136-1159.
[97]Laskin A V.A descriptive account of the Finance investor relations profession: A
national study[J].The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 2009, 46(2): 208-
233.
[98]Malmendier U, Tate G.CEO overconfidence and corporate investment[J].The
journal of finance, 2005, 60(6): 2661-2700.
[99]Marquis C, Tilcsik A.Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory[J].Academy of
Management Annals, 2013, 7(1): 195-245.
[100]Marston C.The organization of the Finance investor relations function by large
UK quoted companies[J].Omega, 1996, 24(4): 477-488.
[101]Marston C., Leow, C.Y..Financial Reporting on the Internet by Leading UK
Companies.Paper Presented at Eaa’98, Antwerp,1998.
[102]Mathias,B.D, Williams,D.W.and Smith,A.R.Entrepreneurial Inception: The Role
of Imprinting in Entrepreneurial Action[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2015(30):11-
28.
[103]Preiholt H.Finance investor Relations, Financial Marketing and Target
Groups[J].Marketing Management Journal.Vol.14, 2004, 14: 128-132.
[104]Serfling M A.CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies[J].Journal of
Corporate Finance, 2014, 25: 251-273.
[105]Smith W, Tushman M.Management strategic contradictions:A top management
model for management innovation stream[J].Organization Science,2005,16(5):522-
536.
[106]Suutari V, Mäkelä K.The career capital of managers with global
careers[J].Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2007.
[107]Tanikawa T, Jung Y.Top management team(TMT) tenure diversity and firm
performance: Examining the moderating effect of TMT average age[J].International
Journal of Organizational Analysis,2016,24(3):454-470.
[108]Thomas D E, Arthur M, Hood JN.Internationalization, TMT gender diversity
and firm performancein mexican business[J].International Journal of Strategic
Management,2012,12(2):1555-2411.
[109]Van Witteloostuijn A, Boone C.A resource-based theory of market structure and
organizational form[J].Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(2): 409-426.
[110]Wallace R S O, Naser K.Firm-specific determinants of the
comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of
business listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong[J].Journal of Accounting and
Public policy, 1995, 14(4): 311-368.
[111]Wei L Q, Ling Y.CEO characteristics and corporate entrepreneurship in
transition economies: Evidence from China[J].Journal of Business Research, 2015,
68(6): 1157-1165.
[112] Ye Kangtao, Zhang Shanshan, Zhang Yixin. The Value Correlation between
Enterprise Strategic Differences and Accounting Information [J]. Accounting
Research, 2014 (5): 44-51
[113]Vanacker T ， Collewaert V ， Paeleman I.The relationship between slack
resources and the performance of entrepreneurial business：the role of venture capital
and angel investors [J].Journal of Management Studies，2013，50(6)：1070-1096.
[114] Zhu Zhenduo, Li Xinchun, Ye Wenping "Get on the horse and send off":
strategic change and paternalism in the intergenerational inheritance of family
businesses [J]. Management World, 2018, 34 (11): 65-79
[115]Richard O C ， Wu J ， Markoczy L A ， et al.Top ma-nagement team
demographic-faultline strength and stra-tegic change ：what role does environmental
dynamism play? [J].Strategic Management Journal，2019，40(6)：987-1009.
Yunjiang, Ning Xin Is it 'young and promising' or 'old and strong'—— CEO Career
Focus and Strategic Change [J]. Economic Management, 2020, 42 (6): 135-152
[116] Yin Zhiping, Zhang Zhaoguo. Management tenure, internal control and strategic
differences [J]. China soft science, 2016 (12): 132-143
[117] Liu Xin, Xue Youzhi. CEO Succession, Performance Deviation, and Company
R&D Investment - From the Perspective of Strategic Change Direction [J]. Nankai
Management Review, 2015, 18 (3): 34-47