Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Original Paper

Nephron 2000;85:207–214 Accepted: November 18, 1999

Increased Excretions of ß2-Microglobulin,


IL-6, and IL-8 and Decreased Excretion of
Tamm-Horsfall Glycoprotein in Urine of Patients
with Active Lupus nephritis
Chang-Youh Tsai a Tsai-Hung Wu b Chia-Li Yu c Jia-Yu Lu a
Ying-Yang Tsai a
Sections of a Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, and b Nephrology, Department of Medicine,
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, and c Department of Medicine,
National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Key Words with LN was significantly higher than that in normal indi-
Interleukin 6 W Interleukin 8 W Lupus nephritis W viduals. The excretion of ß2M in patients with active or
ß2-Microglobulin W Renal tubular function W inactive LN was not significantly different. The THG
Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein excretion was lower in patients with active LN and tubu-
lointerstitial inflammation as compared with patients
with inactive LN or normal individuals. Six patients
Abstract underwent pulse cyclophosphamide therapy during the
Tubulointerstitial nephritis is a less frequently recog- course of experiments. Five of them showed a decrease
nized but important complication of systemic lupus ery- in IL-8 and IL-6 excretions in urine after the treatment.
thematosus. We have investigated the cytokine ß2-micro- The excretions of ß2M and THG in urine, in addition to
globulin (ß2M) and Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein (THG) IL-6 and IL-8, can reflect the renal inflammatory activity
excretions in the urine of systemic lupus erythematosus in patients with lupus tubulointerstitial nephritis as well
patients to identify indices for evaluation of tubulointer- as in those having lupus glomerulonephritis.
stitial inflammation in lupus nephritis (LN). Daily urine Copyright © 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

was collected from 15 patients with active LN, from 12


patients with inactive LN, and from 17 normal subjects.
The amounts of soluble interleukin (IL) 2 receptor, IL-6, Introduction
IL-8, ß2M, and THG in urine were measured. ß2M and
THG were regarded as indicators of proximal and distal Glomerulonephritis (GN) is a common complication
renal tubule function, respectively. The urinary excre- in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The
tions of IL-6 and IL-8 were significantly higher in patients severity of the glomerular lesions may determine the prog-
with active LN than in those with inactive LN and in nor- nosis of the patients with SLE [1, 2]. Tubulointerstitial
mal individuals. The excretion of soluble IL-2 receptor in involvement of the kidneys is another well-recognized but
all three groups of subjects was not significantly differ- less frequently emphasized abnormality in SLE [3–6].
ent. On the other hand, the excretion of ß2M in patients The lesion occurs rarely in SLE without glomerular in-
Siriraj Medical Library, Mahidol University

© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel Chang-Youh Tsai, MD, PhD


ABC
202.28.191.34 - 2/26/2015 6:39:03 AM

0028–2766/00/0853–0207$17.50/0 Section of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine


Fax + 41 61 306 12 34 Taipei Veterans General Hospital
E-Mail karger@karger.ch Accessible online at: No. 201, Sec 2, Shih-Pai Road
www.karger.com www.karger.com/journals/nef Taipei 112 (Taiwan)
Downloaded by:
volvement [7, 8]. Clinically, renal biopsy is usually per- diagnosed by renal biopsy. The activity of LN at the time of study
formed for the diagnosis and therapeutic guidance for was judged by the following indices: (1) the presence of proteinuria;
(2) abnormal urinary sediments; (3) increased serum titer of anti-
lupus nephritis (LN). Results from renal biopsies have
dsDNA; (4) decreased serum levels of complements, and (5) presence
indicated that LN often presents with transition from one of GN and tubulointerstitial changes including tubular dilatation or
histologic class to another at successive follow-ups [1, 2, atrophy, inflammatory cell infiltration, and/or interstitial fibrosis as
9–11]. Consequently, serial renal biopsies are necessary to demonstrated by renal biopsy. Fifteen patients were classified as hav-
evaluate the accurate activity of LN. However, perform- ing active LN, while 12 patients were classified as having inactive
LN. Findings of urinary sediments, serum titers of anti-dsDNA, cre-
ing sequential renal biopsies in SLE patients is neither
atinine clearance rates, and histopathological classifications of these
desirable nor practical. Some of the routine laboratory patients are listed in table 1. Seventeen normal individuals served as
parameters such as urinary sediments, serum level of controls. Twenty-four-hour urine was collected from patients and
DNA-anti-DNA immune complexes, and complements controls. After pooling and recording the volume of the urine, 5-ml
may be helpful in determining the activity of LN [12–14]. urine samples were stored at –20 ° C for enzyme-linked immunosor-
bent assay (ELISA).
Nevertheless, the parameters are not always easy to obtain
because serial blood drawings are necessary for some of ELISA for IL-6, IL-8, sIL-2R, and ß2M
these items. Besides, fluctuations of these parameters are ELISA kits for IL-6 and IL-8 were purchased from R & D Systems
frequently reflecting overall renal inflammation including (Minneapolis, Minn., USA), for sIL-2R from AMAC (Westbrook,
glomerular as well as tubulointerstitial pathology. Deter- Me., USA), and for ß2M from T Cell Sciences (Cambridge, Mass.,
USA). The minimal detectable doses were 3.5 pg/ml for IL-6,
mination of the amount of immune process related mole-
18.1 pg/ml for IL-8, 210 pg/ml for sIL-2R, and 0.25 Ìg/ml for ß2M.
cules in urine would thus be an alternative way to evaluate The detailed procedures for the detection of these molecules were
the severity of renal inflammation in LN. These mole- described in individual instructions provided by the manufacturers.
cules include interleukin (IL) 1, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis
factor alpha (TNF-·), transforming growth factor beta, Purification of THG from Pregnancy Urine
Urine was collected from normal pregnant women after the 6th
IL-2 receptor (IL-2R), TNF inhibitors, and type IV colla-
month of conception. The purification of THG was carried out as
gen [15–22]. described previously [30, 31]. Briefly, a batch volume of pregnancy
Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein (THG), a 7 ! 107-dalton urine was made 0.58 M with NaCl and stirred for 30 min, centri-
macromolecule, is synthesized exclusively by epithelial fuged at 2,000 g for 10 min, and the supernatant discarded. The pre-
cells in thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle and early cipitate was dissolved in alkaline distilled water (pH 9.0, adjusted
with 1 M NaOH) and centrifuged to remove insoluble substances.
distal convoluted tubule of the kidney [23, 24]. The
The supernatant was then made 0.58 M NaCl. The precipitate was
macromolecule is directly excreted in the urine [25] and again dissolved in alkaline distilled water (pH 9.0) and left stirred
can be used as a specific marker for distal renal tubular overnight at 4 ° C, centrifuged, and the precipitate discarded. The
cells. ß2-Microglobulin (ß2M), a low molecular weight pro- solution was dialyzed extensively against distilled water at 4 ° C,
tein (11,818 daltons), forming the light chain of the major lyophilized, weighed, and dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS; pH 9.0). This THG solution was used for standard curve titra-
histocompatibility complex class I molecule [26], is nor-
tion in the ELISA of THG. The identification of THG including its
mally eliminated by glomerular filtration followed by purity and molecular weight was made using 10% sodium dodecyl
reabsorption and catabolism in the proximal renal tubular sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
cells [27]. The increased urinary excretion of ß2M has
been used to diagnose tubulointerstitial renal lesions [28]. ELISA for THG
Polystyrene microtiter plates (Corning Glass Works, Corning,
In the present study, we measured the proinflammatory
N.Y., USA) were incubated with 100 Ìl/well of sheep IgG antihuman
cytokines or cytokine receptor such as IL-8, IL-6, soluble uromucoid antibodies (20 Ìg protein/ml; Biodesign International,
IL-2R (sIL-2R), and renal tubule associated molecules, Kennbunk, Me., USA) in coating buffer (50 mM ) carbonate buffer,
THG and ß2M, in the urine of patients with LN in order pH 9.6) at 4 ° C for 24 h before washing three times with 0.05%
to understand further the pathophysiology of the disease. Tween 20 in 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.2). The wells were subsequently
coated with 0.2% bovine serum albumin in PBS (pH 7.2) at room
temperature for 4 h. After washing three times, to each well was add-
ed 100 Ìl of standard THG solutions (5, 25, 125, and 625 ng/ml) or
Patients and Methods 1:4 diluted (PBS) urine and incubated at 37 ° C for additional 2 h.
After washes, each well was filled with 100 Ìl of 1:4,000 diluted
Patients and Controls horseradish peroxidase conjugated sheep antiuromucoid antobodies
Twenty-seven patients (female:male ratio 25:2) fulfilling four or (Biodesign International) and incubated at 37 ° C for 2 h. After three
more of the 1982 American Rheumatism Association revised criteria times of washing, color was developed by reacting wells with 100 Ìl
for the classification of SLE [29] were enrolled in the present investi- of substrate solution (0.01 g o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride in
gation. All of the patients had disease complicated by nephritis as 19 ml of PBS and 1 ml of 0.3% H2O2). The mixture was incubated at

208 Nephron 2000;85:207–214 Tsai/Wu/Yu/Lu/Tsai


Siriraj Medical Library, Mahidol University
202.28.191.34 - 2/26/2015 6:39:03 AM
Downloaded by:
Table 1. Comparisons of renal pathology, urine sediment, serum level of anti-dsDNA, and creatinine in active and
inactive LN

Patient Renal pathology Urine sediment, cells high-power field Anti-dsDNA Creatinine
No. IU/ml clearance
classa ICIb TICc red white casts
ml/min
blood cells blood cells

Active LN
1 III + D/F 3–5 6–10 – 90 58
2 IV + D/F 1+ 11–20 granular 1–2 74 81
3 IV ++ D/F 6–10 1+ – 1300 60
4 IV +++ F 1+ 6–10 granular 0–2 1300 80
5 IV + F 1+ 8–10 – 220 5.5
6 IV + F 0–2 11–20 – 1300 113
7 III + D 10–12 1–3 – 105 33
8 IV +++ D 4+ 6–10 – 91 58.6
9 IV +++ F 0 1+ – 1300 27
10 IV ++ F 0–2 36–50 – 1300 26.2
11 IV ++ 10–12 2+ – 1300 47
12 IV ++ F 6–10 6–10 hyaline 0–2 1300 12
13 III + D 6–10 6–10 – 280 85
14 IV ++ F 1+ 3–5 – 1300 37
15 III ++ D 3–5 11–20 epithelial 6–10 290 34.9
Inactive LN
1 V + F 0–2 0–2 – 64 11
2 II – 0 3–5 – !30 30
3 II – D 0–2 0–2 – !30 56
4 II – 0–2 3–5 – !30 94
5 II – 0 3–5 – !30 10
6 II – 0–1 1–2 – !30 42
7 II + 0–2 3–5 – !30 33
8 II – 0–2 3–5 – !30 67
9 V ++ D 0–2 3–5 – 50 69.8
10 II – 0 0–2 – !30 52
11 II – 0 0 – !30 57
12 V + F 3–5 3–5 – !30 110

a According to the WHO classification for lupus nephritis.


b Interstitial cell infiltration: – = No significant cellular infiltration in interstitium; + = a few mononuclear cells; ++ =
scattered mononuclear cells and polymorphonuclear cells; +++ = heavy mononuclear as well as polymorphonuclear
cell infiltration.
c Tubulointerstitial change: D = Tubular dilatation/atrophy; F = interstitial fibrosis.

37 ° C for 20 min, and the reaction was stopped by adding 50 Ìl of Results


4 M H2SO4. The concentration was measured by a spectrophotome-
ter at OD492 nm.
Active and Inactive LN
Statisticals Conspicuously abnormal urinary sediments (erythro-
The results are presented as mean values B SD. Differences cytes, white blood cells, or casts) were present in active
among groups were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test for nonparamet- but not in inactive LN (table 1). The serum titer of anti-
ric analysis of variance or Wilcoxon rank sum test using SPSS com- dsDNA antibodies in the active LN group was much high-
puter software. Significance was set at p ! 0.05.
er than in the inactive LN group. However, the creatinine
clearance rate was variable in either group (table 1). The

Cytokines and Renal Tubular Function in Nephron 2000;85:207–214 209


Lupus nephritis
Siriraj Medical Library, Mahidol University
202.28.191.34 - 2/26/2015 6:39:03 AM
Downloaded by:
Fig. 1. Comparison of daily protein excretions in urine in patients Fig. 2. Comparison of daily urinary IL-6 excretions in patients with
with active and inactive LN. The mean value in each group is shown active and inactive LN and in normal subjects. The mean value in
by a horizontal line. The p value was calculated by the Wilcoxon rank each group is shown by a horizontal line. The p values were calcu-
sum test. lated by the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

daily amount of proteinuria in active LN was significantly that immunological and inflammatory reactions are
higher (p = 0.0025 as calculated by nonparametric present in the kidneys of patients with LN and can be
Wilcoxon rank sum test) than in inactive LN (fig. 1). reflected by the amount of IL-6 and IL-8 in the urine.

Daily Urinary Excretions of IL-6, IL-8, and sIL-2R Daily Urinary Excretions of ß2M and THG in Patients
in Patients with Active and Inactive LN and in with Active and Inactive LN and in Normal Subjects
Normal Subjects We measured the urinary excretions of ß2M and THG
IL-6, IL-8, and sIL-2R are frequently found at the site as the indices for proximal and distal tubule functions,
of immune system-mediated inflammation. The amount respectively. As shown in table 2, the urinary ß2M excre-
of the molecules can reflect the severity of the inflamma- tion in patients with active and inactive LN was much
tory reaction. As shown in figures 2 and 3, the daily uri- higher than in normal controls. On the other hand, the
nary excretions of IL-6 and IL-8 were significantly higher urinary excretion of THG in patients with active LN was
in patients with active LN than in those with inactive LN significantly lower than in normal subjects. Among 15
(p = 0.034 with regard to IL-6; p = 0.0034 with regard to patients with active LN, there were 9 patients with in-
IL-8) or in normal controls (p ! 0.001 with regard to both tense cellular infiltration in the interstitium (++ or +++;
IL-6 and IL-8; calculations by nonparametric Wilcoxon table 1). The THG excretion in the urine of these patients
rank sum test). The sIL-2R excretion in urine was not sig- was significantly lower than that of the other 6 patients
nificantly different among the three groups of subjects without significant interstitial cell infiltration (989.28 B
(nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance by 66.38 vs. 1705.28 B 193.16 Ìg/day; p ! 0.01 as calculated
rank), as shown in figure 4. The results have indicated by nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test). Although, the

210 Nephron 2000;85:207–214 Tsai/Wu/Yu/Lu/Tsai


Siriraj Medical Library, Mahidol University
202.28.191.34 - 2/26/2015 6:39:03 AM
Downloaded by:
Fig. 3. Comparison of daily urinary excretions of IL-8 in patients Fig. 4. Comparison of daily urinary excretions of sIL-2R in patients
with active and inactive LN and in normal subjects. The mean values with active and inactive LN and in normal subjects. The mean value
in patients with active and inactive LN are shown by a horizontal in each group is shown by a horizontal line. The global p value which
line. The p values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. was statistically insignificant was calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis
test for nonparametric analysis of variance.

Table 2. Comparison of daily urinary


excretions of ß2M and THG in controls and Controls Inactive LN Active LN
patients with inactive and active LN (n = 17) (n = 12) (n = 15)

ß2M, Ìg/day 202.10B107.57 2,840.38B1,110.50 4,025.56B1,456.53


p ! 0.001a 1 0.05b ! 0.0001a
THG, Ìg/day 2,286.47B79.77 1,654.02B248.90 1,275.69B384.28
p 1 0.05a 1 0.05b ! 0.01a

a Compared with the controls; the p value was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn
procedure.
b Comparison between inactive and active LN; the p value was calculated by Kruskal-
Wallis test with Dunn procedure.

differentiation of proximal from distal tubular damage Consecutive Determination of Daily Urinary
could not be definitely performed on the basis of histo- Excretions of IL-6 and IL-8 in Patients with Active LN
pathological observations, these results have suggested before and after Immunosuppressive Therapy
that the impairment of renal tubular function exists more Because IL-8 is a potent amplifier of acute inflamma-
or less in patients with LN in addition to GN. tion [32] and is rarely found in normal urine (as shown in

Cytokines and Renal Tubular Function in Nephron 2000;85:207–214 211


Lupus nephritis
Siriraj Medical Library, Mahidol University
202.28.191.34 - 2/26/2015 6:39:03 AM
Downloaded by:
Discussion

The normal urine contains small amounts of IL-1 and


many kinds of cytokine inhibitors including IL-1 inhibi-
tor, sIL-2R, and TNF-R [33–37]. In diseases of the kidney
and the urinary tract, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-·, and trans-
forming growth factor beta can be detected in the urine
[15–19]. Apparently, these cytokines are derived from
local production of various types of cells participating in
inflammatory reactions in the renal parenchyma.
Glomerular hypercellularity during the acute phase of
glomerular diseases is caused predominantly by intra-
glomerular infiltration of polymorphonuclear neutrophils
and mononuclear cells. However, the precise mechanism
eliciting the infiltration of these cells remains to be solved.
Accumulating evidence has indicated the inflammatory
cytokines such as IL-1 [38], TNF-· [38, 39], and IL-6 [40]
may play important roles in the pathogenesis of glomeru-
lar diseases and are involved in the acute exacerbation of
proliferative GN [15]. Recently, many authors reported
Fig. 5. Daily urinary IL-8 excretion in 6 patients with active LN an elevation of urinary IL-6 and IL-8 in active LN [17,
before and after two courses of immunosuppressive treatment (cyclo- 18]. IL-6 is one of the cytokines involved in the inflamma-
phosphamide 0.5 g/m2 within 6 months). The excretion of IL-8 in the
tory response as well as in the defense mechanisms of the
urine decreased in 5 patients. However, the IL-8 excretion in urine
remained high in 1 patient who was treated ineffectively. host [41]. Our results also showed that the urinary IL-6
excretion can be a good indicator for the activity of LN.
IL-8, a specific and potent neutrophil chemotactic cyto-
kine, acts as a driving force for neutrophil activation dur-
figure 3), we measured this molecule in urine as an indica- ing the acute inflammatory reaction [32]. Thereby, the
tor for renal inflammation. Also, previous investigations detection of these proinflammatory cytokines in the urine
[17] have demonstrated the usefulness of urinary IL-6 might be useful for detecting and monitoring the inflam-
measurement in LN. We determined the urinary IL-6 and matory activity of LN. Histologically, LN is not confined
IL-8 excretions in 6 patients with active LN before and to the glomerular lesions. 38–66% of the kidney biopsy
after treatment with cyclophosphamide. As shown in fig- specimens from SLE patients are found to have GN in
ure 5, the daily urinary IL-8 excretion decreased after conjunction with tubulointerstitial involvement [3–6].
treatment in 5 of the 6 patients. The decrease was also in The extraglomerular deposition of immune complexes at
parallel with the decrease of anti-dsDNA antibodies and the tubular and interstitial sites is believed to mediate the
fading out of urine sediments (data not shown). The only development of different degrees of renal tubule impair-
patient who did not show a decrease in the excretion of ment in SLE [3, 4, 7]. In the present study, several inter-
IL-8 was found to be refractory to the immunosuppressive esting findings have been observed in those with active
therapy because she subsequently developed neurological LN with tubulointerstitial inflammation: (1) elevated uri-
symptoms that were likely to be relevant to lupus activity. nary excretion of IL-6 and IL-8, but not sIL-2R, in active
The urinary IL-6 excretion also showed a similar de- rather than in inactive LN; (2) increased urinary ß2M
crease, as the patient underwent immunosuppressive excretion in patients with LN as compared with normal
treatment (data not shown). These results suggested that individuals, and (3) decreased urinary THG excretion in
the urinary excretion of IL-6 and/or IL-8 is a good indica- active LN with tubulointerstitial disease. These results
tor of the severity of renal inflammation and can have have suggested that both glomerular and tubular lesions
therapeutic implications in monitoring the disease activi- exist in LN and that the lesions are more prominent in
ty in patients with LN. active nephritis. In addition, both proximal and distal
renal tubule functions are impaired in patients with LN,
and the impairment seems to be relevant to the severity of

212 Nephron 2000;85:207–214 Tsai/Wu/Yu/Lu/Tsai


Siriraj Medical Library, Mahidol University
202.28.191.34 - 2/26/2015 6:39:03 AM
Downloaded by:
glomerular as well as tubulointerstitial inflammation in active LN. However, we could not find a similar differ-
the kidney. ence among patients with active or inactive LN as well as
Damage of distal renal tubules in LN has been rarely in normal subjects in the present study, although a ten-
reported in the literature. We have selected THG, a 7 ! dency of an increased urinary excretion of sIL-2R in
107-dalton macromolecule, as the indicator molecule be- patients with LN was noted. One possible reason for this
cause the protein is synthesized exclusively by the epithe- discrepancy is that sIL-2R may be a more sensitive index
lial cells of the thick ascending limb of Henle’s loop and for lupus GN than for lupus interstitial nephritis because
the early distal convoluted tubule [23, 24]. The macromo- involvement of humoral as well as cellular factors in these
lecule is directly excreted without catabolism in the urine. two conditions is different. Another reason might be that
Thus, a decrease in the excretion of THG may reflect measuring procedures are different in these two studies.
purely the abnormality of the distal renal tubules. Because In the previous sIL-2 study, we did not measure the
it is difficult to differentiate distal or proximal tubular amount of sIL-2R in fresh urine. Rather, we measured
damage even by histopathological examination, THG this molecule in partially purified urinary protein (5 mg/
quantitation in urine may be a good alternative way for ml). sIL-2R molecules might have been ‘refined’ or con-
evaluation of the distal tubular damage. Furthermore, centrated during these procedures. Conversely, in the
THG can bind to viruses [42, 43], bacteria [44], bacterial present study, we measured the total amount of sIL-2R in
extract [45], and extracellular matrix [46] and may modu- 24-hour urine regardless of protein concentration. So, sIL-
late immunologic [31] as well as inflammatory reactions 2R molecules were in ‘crude’ status which could lead to
[30]. Hence, the protein is regarded as an important con- difficulty for measurement. Despite these presumable
tributor to the defense mechanism in the urinary system. causes for discordance, there might be other reasons lead-
The decreased urinary excretion of THG in active LN ing to the disagreement which deserve further investiga-
with tubulointerstitial damage may represent two clinical tions.
meanings: (1) it reflects the severity of distal renal tubular In conclusion, the measurements of daily urinary IL-6
dysfunction in SLE patients, and (2) it may represent a and IL-8 excretions may be more practical methods for
possible etiopathologic factor rendering LN patients sus- monitoring the progression of LN as compared with serial
ceptible to urinary tract infections. More direct evidence renal biopsies. ß2M and THG can be used as sensitive
may be necessary to support these speculations. indicators reflecting the proximal and distal renal tubular
It is believed that the urinary excretion of ß2M is deter- damage in patients with SLE. In addition to glomerular
mined primarily by proximal renal tubular cells. More lesions, both proximal and distal tubular impairments are
than 99.9% of the filtered ß2M is reabsorbed and catabo- present in patients with active LN.
lized in the proximal convoluted tubule [27]. The in-
creased urinary excretion of ß2M in patients with SLE was
reported by Yeung et al. [5]. The present investigation Acknowledgments
also confirmed this finding. In addition, the urinary ex-
This work was supported by grants from National Science Coun-
cretion of ß2M is remarkable in patients with active LN. cil (NSC88-2331-B075-049), Taipei Veterans General Hospital
In a previous report [20], we have demonstrated an (VGH-305 and VGH-5), and Yen-Tjing Ling Medical Research
increased urinary excretion of sIL-2R in patients with Foundation (CI-87-3).

References

1 Appel GB, Silva FG, Pirani CL, Meltzer JI, 3 Brentjens JR, Sepulveda M, Baliah T, Bentzel 6 O’Dell JR, Hays RC, Guggenheim SJ, Steiger-
Estes D: Renal involvement in systemic lupus C, Erlanger BF, Elwood C, Montes M, Hsu KC, wald JC: Tubulointerstitial renal disease in sys-
erythematosus (SLE): A study of 56 patients Andres GA: Interstitial immune complex ne- temic lupus erythematosus. Arch Intern Med
emphasizing histologic classification. Medicine phritis in patients with systemic lupus erythe- 1985;145:1996–1999.
(Baltimore) 1978;57:371–410. matosus. Kidney Int 1975;7:342–350. 7 Tron F, Ganeval D, Droz D: Immunologically-
2 Adler SG, Cohen AH, Glassock RI: Secondary 4 Lehman DH, Wilson CB, Dixon FJ: Extra- mediated acute renal failure of nonglomerular
glomerular diseases; in Brenner BM (ed): The glomerular immunoglobulin deposits in human origin in the course of systemic lupus erythe-
Kidney, ed 5. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1996, pp nephritis. Am J Med 1975;58:765–786. matosus (SLE): Report of two cases. Am J Med
1498–1596. 5 Yeung CK, Wong KL, Ng RP, Ng WL: Tubular 1979;67:529–532.
dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Nephron 1984;36:84–88.

Cytokines and Renal Tubular Function in Nephron 2000;85:207–214 213


Lupus nephritis
Siriraj Medical Library, Mahidol University
202.28.191.34 - 2/26/2015 6:39:03 AM
Downloaded by:
8 Makker SP: Tubular basement membrane anti- 20 Tsai C-Y, Wu T-H, Sun K-H, Lin W-M, Yu 33 Kimball ES, Pickeral SF, Oppenheim JJ, Ros-
body-induced interstitial nephritis in systemic C-L: Increased excretion of soluble interleu- sio JL: Interleukin 1 activity in normal human
lupus erythematosus. Am J Med 1980;69:949– kin 2 receptors and free light chain immuno- urine. J Immunol 1984;133:256–260.
952. globulins in the urine of patients with active 34 Liao Z, Grimshaw RS, Rosenstreich DL: Iden-
9 Baldwin DS, Gluck MC, Lowenstein J, Gallo lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1992;51:168– tification of a specific interleukin 1 inhibitor in
GR: Lupus nephritis: Clinical course as related 172. the urine of febrile patients. J Exp Med 1984;
to morphologic forms and their transitions. Am 21 Susuki J, Tomizawa S, Arai H, Seki Y, Maruya- 159:126–136.
J Med 1977;62:12–30. ma K, Kuroume T: Purification of two types of 35 Marcon L, Fritz ME, Kurman CC, Jensen JC,
10 Hill GS, Hinglais N, Tron F, Bach J-F: Sys- TNF inhibitors in the urine of the patient with Nelson DL: Soluble Tac peptide is present in
temic lupus erythematosus: Morphologic corre- chronic glomerulonephritis. Nephron 1994;66: the urine of normal individuals and at elevated
lations with immunologic and clinical data at 386–390. levels in patients with adult T cell leukaemia
the time of biopsy. Am J Med 1978;64:61–79. 22 Donovan KL, Coles GA, Williams JD: An (ATL). Clin Exp Immunol 1988;73:29–33.
11 Lee HS, Mujais SK, Kasinath BS, Spargo BH, ELISA for the detection of type IV collagen in 36 Novick D, Engelmann H, Wallach D, Rubin-
Katz AI: Course of renal pathology in patients human urine: Application to patients with glo- stein M: Soluble cytokine receptors are present
with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med merulonephritis. Kidney Int 1994;46:1431– in normal human urine. J Exp Med 1989;170:
1984;77:612–620. 1437. 1409–1414.
12 Kohler PF, Bensel RT: Serial complement 23 Hoyer JR, Resnick JS, Michael AF, Vernier 37 Engelmann H, Novick D, Wallach D: Two
component alterations in acute glomerulone- RL: Ontogeny of Tamm-Horsfall urinary glyco- tumor necrosis factor-binding proteins purified
phritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin protein. Lab Invest 1974;30:757–761. from human urine. J Biol Chem 1990;265:
Exp Immunol 1969;4:191–202. 24 Kumar S, Muchmore A: Tamm-Horsfall pro- 1531–1536.
13 Bardana EJ Jr, Harbeck RJ, Hoffman AA, tein: Uromodulin (1950–1990). Kidney Int 38 Boswell JM, Yui MA, Burt DW, Kelley VE:
Pirofsky B, Carr RI: The prognostic and thera- 1990;37:1395–1401. Increased tumor necrosis factor and IL-1ß gene
peutic implications of DNA:anti-DNA im- 25 Hoyer JR, Seiler MW: Pathophysiology of expression in the kidneys of mice with lupus
mune complexes in systemic lupus erythemato- Tamm-Horsfall protein. Kidney Int 1979;16: nephritis. J Immunol 1988;141:3050–3054.
sus (SLE). Am J Med 1975;59:515–522. 279–289. 39 Egido J, Gómez-Chiarri M, Ortı́z A, Bustos C,
14 Valentijn RM, van Overhagen M, Hazevoet 26 Cunningham BA, Wang JL, Bergård I, Peter- Alonso J, Gómez-Guerrero C, Gómez-Garre
HM, Hermans J, Cats A, Daha MR, van Es LA: son PA: The complete amino acid sequence D, López-Armada MJ, Plaza J, Gonzalez E:
The value of complement and immune com- of ß2-microglobulin. Biochemistry 1973;12: Role of tumor necrosis factor-· in the patho-
plex determinations in monitoring disease ac- 4811–4821. genesis of glomerular diseases. Kidney Int
tivity in patients with systemic lupus erythema- 27 Hall PW III, Chung-Park M, Vacca CV, Lon- 1993;43(suppl 39):59–64.
tosus. Arthritis Rheum 1985;28:904–913. don M, Crowley AQ: The renal handling of 40 Horii Y, Iwano M, Hirata E, Shiiki H, Fujii Y,
15 Noble B, Ren K, Taverne J, Dipirro J, van beta2-microglobulin in the dog. Kidney Int Dohi K, Ishikawa H: Role of interleukin-6 in
Liew J, Dijkstra C, Janossy G, Poulter LW: 1982;22:156–161. the progression of mesangial proliferative glo-
Mononuclear cells in glomeruli and cytokines 28 Portman RJ, Kissane JM, Robson AM, Peter- merulonephritis. Kidney Int 1993;43(suppl
in urine reflect the severity of experimental son LJ, Richardson A: Use of ß2-microglobulin 39):71–75.
proliferative immune complex glomerulone- to diagnose tubulo-interstitial renal lesions in 41 Hirano T, Kishimoto T: Interleukin 6; in Sporn
phritis. Clin Exp Immunol 1990;80:281–287. children. Kidney Int 1986;30:91–98. MB, Roberts AB (eds): Handbook of Experi-
16 Ohta K, Takano N, Seno A, Yachie A, Miyawa- 29 Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, mental Pharmacology. Heidelberg, Springer,
ki T, Yokoyama H, Tomosugi N, Kato E, Tani- McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, Schaller JG, Talal 1990, vol 95/I, p 633.
guchi N: Detection and clinical usefulness of N, Winchester RJ: The 1982 revised criteria for 42 Tamm I, Horsfall FL Jr: A mucoprotein de-
urinary interleukin-6 in the diseases of the kid- the classification of systemic lupus erythemato- rived from human urine which reacts with
ney and the urinary tract. Clin Nephrol 1992; sus. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:1271–1277. influenza, mumps, and Newcastle disease vi-
38:185–189. 30 Yu C-L, Lin W-M, Liao T-S, Tsai C-Y, Sun ruses. J Exp Med 1952;95:71–97.
17 Iwano M, Dohi K, Hirata E, Kurumatani N, K-H, Chen K-H: Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein 43 Tamm I, Burgher JC, Horsfall FL Jr: Ultracen-
Horii Y, Shiiki H, Fukatsu A, Matsuda T, Hira- (THG) purified from normal pregnancy urine trifugation studies of a urinary protein which
no T, Kishimoto T, Ishikawa H: Urinary levels increases phagocytosis, complement receptor reacts with various viruses. J Biol Chem 1955;
of IL-6 in patients with active lupus nephritis. expressions and arachidonic acid metabolism 212:125–133.
Clin Nephrol 1993;40:16–21. of polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Immuno- 44 Gasth A, Ahlstedt S, Hanson LA, Jann B, Jann
18 Wada T, Yokoyama H, Tomosugi N, Hisada pharmacology 1992;24:181–190. K, Kaijser B: Cross-reactions between Tamm-
Y, Ohta S, Naito T, Kobayashi K-I, Mukaida 31 Yu C-L, Tasi C-Y, Lin W-M, Liao T-S, Chen Horsfall glycoprotein and Escherichia coli. Int
N, Matsushima K: Detection of urinary inter- H-L, Sun K-H, Chen K-H: Tamm-Horsfall uri- Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1980;63:303–311.
leukin-8 in glomerular diseases. Kidney Int nary glycoprotein enhances monokine release 45 Shachner MS, Miniter PM, Mayrer AR, An-
1994;46:455–460. and augments lymphocyte proliferation. Im- driole VT: Interaction of Tamm-Horsfall pro-
19 Kanai H, Mitsuhashi H, Ono K, Yano S, Na- munopharmacology 1993;26:249–258. tein with bacterial extracts. Kidney Int 1987;
ruse T: Increased excretion of urinary trans- 32 Baggiolini M, Walz A, Kunkel SL: Neutrophil- 31:77–84.
forming growth factor beta in patients with activating peptide-1/interleukin 8, a novel cy- 46 Lambert C, Brealey R, Steele J, Rook GAW:
focal glomerular sclerosis. Nephron 1994;66: tokine that activates neutrophils. J Clin Invest The interaction of Tamm-Horsfall protein with
391–395. 1989;84:1045–1049. extracellular matrix. Immunology 1993;79:
203–210.

214 Nephron 2000;85:207–214 Tsai/Wu/Yu/Lu/Tsai


Siriraj Medical Library, Mahidol University
202.28.191.34 - 2/26/2015 6:39:03 AM
Downloaded by:

You might also like