Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sem V - Family Law
Sem V - Family Law
Case laws
Sources of Hindu law
1. In the case of Subbane v. Nawab, Privy Council observed that a custom gets its force
due to the fact that due to its observation for a long time in a locality, it has obtained the
force of law.
2. In the case of Soorendranath v. Heeramonie and Bikal v Manjura, Privy Council
observed that customs followed by a family have long been recognized as Hindu law
3. In the case of Chitty v. Chitty, a custom that permits divorce by mutual consent and by
payment of expenses of marriage by one party to another was held to be not immoral.
4. In the case of Gopikrishna v. Mst Jagoo, a custom that dissolves the marriage and
permits a wife to remarry upon abandonment and desertion of the husband was held to
be not immoral.
5. Prakash v. Parmeshwari: If a custom is against any statutory law, it is invalid.
6. In Kanchava v. Girimalappa, (before the passing of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956) it
was laid down by the Privy Council that the murderer was disqualified from inheriting the
property of the victim.
The rule of English Law was applied to Hindus on grounds of justice, equity, and good
conscience
Conditions for valid marriage
7. SC held in Sarla Mudgal v Union of India that, when one is already married under the
Hindu Law, he by embracing Islam cannot solemnize a second marriage under Muslim
Law, which permits polygamy.
8. In R. Lakshmi Narayan v. Santhi, it was held that to brand the wife as unfit for marriage
and procreation of children on account of a mental disorder, it needs to be established
that the ailment suffered by her is of such a nature that, it is impossible to lead a normal
married life with her, making the standard of proof quite strict.
9. In Gnanasoundari vs. Nallathambi and Others, the Madras HC clarified that section
88 of the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 Act shall cover prohibitions based on blood
relations and affinity.
Solemnisation of marriage - Hindu law
10. In Deivani v. Chindavdram held that the two essential ceremonies to be performed for
the solemnization of a Hindu Marriage are namely, kanyadaan or the gift of the girl and
the saptapadi and if saptapadi is omitted and all other ceremonies are performed then it
cannot be a valid marriage.
11. In Tarapada Jana v. Kumar Bhawani Giri it was held that if Saptapadi is duly
performed, the mere allegations that shlokas were not recited would not invalidate the
marriage.
Divorce under muslim law
12. Triple talaq was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Shayara Bano v.
Union of India.
Unisex marriages
13. National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India & Ors.. It was the first attempt to
legally recognize their gender and the fundamental rights which conferred to all
irrespective of an individual’s sex.
14. Olga Tellis and Ors. v. Bombay Municipal Corporation and Ors held, Article 21
confers freedom of life and liberty, which doesn’t merely amount to physical existence
but a qualitative and meaningful life with dignity.
15. In the case of Shakti Vahini v. Union of India and others the court held that the right to
choose a partner is a fundamental right.
Dower
16. In Abdul Kadir vs Salima, Justice Mahmood also cautioned that Dower (Mahr) in
Muslim marriage should not be confused with consideration in the context of civil
contract.
17. In Nasra Begum v. Rizwan, it was that a woman’s family can refuse to send her to her
matrimonial home if dower is not given
18. In Marina Jatoi v. Nuruddin Jatoi, a Muslim married a Christian woman in England.
The Court observed that the marriage was governed by Muslim law, and therefore, the
husband could divorce his wife by talak. The Court also held that the wife, in turn, could
also claim dower, although no dower was initially fixed at the time of the marriage.
Factum Valet
19. In Rabia Khatoon v. Mukhtar Ahmed, it was observed that the wife may refuse to live
with her husband and to admit him to sexual intercourse, so long as the prompt dower is
not paid.
20. In Deivanai Achi And Another v. R.M.Al.Ct Chidambaram Chettiar And Others, the
doctrine of factum valet was also invoked to validate the marriage. The doctrine, it must
be remembered, enables to cure the violation of a directory provision or a mere matter of
form but does not cure the violation of the fundamental principles or the essence of the
transaction. As in the present case, no ceremonies have been observed; the doctrine of
factum valet cannot help the plaintiffs. The parties deliberately chose to deviate from law
and usage and adopted a marriage ceremony not recognised by either. The doctrine of
factum valet cannot, in our opinion, apply to such a case of deliberate transgression.
21. In Parvathy Ammal v. Gopala Gounder, the omission to do the Sapthapathi, another
equally essential thing like tying the thali has been done. The doctrine was applied and
the marriage was held valid.
22. In Hem Singh And Mula Singh v. Harnam Singh, the texts are merely directory, the
principle of factum valet was said to apply, and the act done is valid and binding. The
case was regarding adoption.
23. In Gopal Narain v. Hanmant Ganesh, a girl was allowed to be given away by her
mother as long as the other ceremonies were performed.
Divorce under Hindu and Christian law
24. Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash: living separately does not necessarily mean living in
different places. The parties can be living together but not as spouses.
25. In the case of Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur and K. Omprakash v. K. Nalini, SC
waived off cooling period
26. In Saumya Ann Thomas vs. The Union of India, the court further held that the “two
year” period in the section 10A(1) of the Divorce Act, shall be read down to a period of
“one year”. It made an exception for the christian couple.
27.
Question paper
Part - A
1. Sources of Hindu law
2. Schools of Muslim law
4. Condition for valid mrg - Hindu and Christian law
5. Solemnisation of mrg - Hindu law
10. Divorce under Muslim law
B
7. Legality and consequences of unisex marriage
8. Concept of dower and types - muslim law
12. Doctrine of factum vallet
14. Divorce by mutual consent - Hindu and Christian
21. Self respect marriage
C
3. Ceremonies of Hind mrg
6. Void and voidable mrg - Hindu law
9. Judicial separation - Hindu and spl mrg act
11. Salient features of family courts act
13. In camera proceedings
15. Iddat period
16. Anuloma and Pratiloma mrg
17. Lilly Thomas v. UOI
18.Sarla Mudgal v. UOI
19. Gowri Ammal v. Tulasi Ammal
20. Demand of dowry
1. Shrutis
- The word is derived from the root “shru” which means “to hear”.
- It is the primary and paramount source of Hindu law and is believed to be the
language of divine revelation through the sages.
- The material heard by people constitutes Shruti. It is believed that Shruti contains
the very words of the Deity.
- The Shruti comprise the four Vedas (Rig-Veda, Sum-Veda, Yajur-Veda and
Atharva-Veda), the six Vedangas and eighteen Upanishads.
- Rigveda is first and foremost among the Shrutis for the knowledge of the law. It
comprehensively deals with the duties of a king.
- It is believed that the Rishis and Munis had reached the height of spirituality
where they revealed the knowledge of Vedas. Vedas primarily contain theories
about sacrifices, rituals, and customs.
- Since Vedas had a divine origin, the society was governed as per the theories
given in them and they are considered to be the fundamental source of Hindu
Vedangas.
- The Upanishads are known as Vedantas or concluding portions of the Vedas and
embody the highest principles of Hindu religion.
- Vedas do refer to certain rights and duties, forms of marriage, the requirement of
a son, exclusion of women from inheritance, and partition but these are not very
clear-cut laws.
2. Smriti
A. The word Smriti is derived from the root “smri” meaning “to remember”.
B. Traditionally, Smritis contain those portions of the Shrutis which the sages forgot
in their original form and the idea whereby they wrote in their own language with
the help of their memory.
C. Through a series of meditation, the words were recollected by the Rishis.
D. So, the basis of the Smritis is Shrutis but they are human works.
E. The rules laid down in Smritis can be divided into three categories viz. Achar
(relating to morality), Vyavahar (signifying procedural and substantive rules which
the King or the State applied for settling disputes in the adjudication of justice)
and Prayaschit (signifying the penal provision for commission of a wrong).
F. Dharmasutras are written in prose, in short maxims (Sutras).
- The Dharmasutras were written from 800 to 200 BC.
- They were meant to be training manuals of sages for teaching students.
- They incorporate the teachings of Vedas with local customs.
- They generally bear the names of their authors and sometimes also
indicate the shakhas to which they belong.
- Some of the important sages whose Dharmasutras are known are:
Gautama, Baudhayan, Apastamba, Harita, Vashistha, and Vishnu. They
explain the duties of men in various relationships.
G. Dharmashastras are composed in poetry (Shlokas).
- Dharmashastras were mostly in metrical verses and were based on
Dharmasutras.
- They were a lot more systematic and clearer.
H. Smritis are a written memoir of the knowledge of the sages.
I. Immediately after the Vedic period, a need for the regulation of the society arose.
Thus, the study of Vedas and the incorporation of local culture and customs
became important.
J. It is believed that many Smritis were composed in this period and some were
reduced into writing, however, not all are known.
K. Vedas were divine laws, while the Smritis were more of secular laws dealing with
morality and religion.
L. The laws laid down in Smritis included law on morality, procedural and
substantive rules applied in the adjudication of disputes and penal provisions
meted out as punishments on wrong doers.
M. Smritis are the foundation of Hindu Law. Juristically they occupy an important
position.
3. Customs:
A. Customs are a principle source
B. usage of custom prevails over the Smritis.
C. It is superior to written law.
D. From the earliest period custom (‘Achara’) is regarded as the highest ‘dharma’.
E. As defined by the Judicial Committee custom signifies a rule which, in a particular
family or in a particular class or district has from long usage obtained the force of
law.
F. Most of the Hindu law is based on customs and practices followed by the people
all across the country.
G. Even smritis have given importance to customs. They have held customs as
transcendent law and have advised the Kings to give decisions based on
customs after due religious consideration.
H. Customs are of four types:
- Local Customs:
These are the customs that are followed in a given geographical area.
In the case of Subbane v. Nawab, Privy Council observed that a custom
gets its force due to the fact that due to its observation for a long time in a
locality, it has obtained the force of law.
- Family Customs:
These are the customs that are followed by a family for a long time.
They can be more easily abandoned than other customs.
In the case of Soorendranath v. Heeramonie and Bikal v Manjura,
Privy Council observed that customs followed by a family have long been
recognized as Hindu law.
- Caste and Community Customs:
These are the customs that are followed by a particular caste or
community.
It is binding on the members of that community or caste.
By far, this is one of the most important sources of laws.
Most of the law in Punjab belongs to this type.
Ex. Custom to marry a brother's widow among certain communities is
also of this type.
- Guild Customs:
These are the customs that are followed by traders.
I. Requirements of a valid custom
- Ancient: 40 years is ancient enough
- Continuous
- Reasonable
- Not against morality:
In the case of Chitty v. Chitty, a custom that permits divorce by mutual
consent and by payment of expenses of marriage by one party to another
was held to be not immoral.
In the case of Gopikrishna v. Mst Jagoo, a custom that dissolves the
marriage and permits a wife to remarry upon abandonment and desertion
of the husband was held to be not immoral.
- Not against law
Prakash v. Parmeshwari: If a custom is against any statutory law, it is
invalid.
- Certainty
- Consistency
J.
4. Digests and commentaries
A. Commentaries (Tika or Bhashya) and Digests (Nibandhs) covered a period of
more than a thousand years from the 7th century to 1800 A.D.
B. In the later period, the works were in the nature of digests containing a synthesis
of the various Smritis and explaining and reconciling the various contradictions.
C. The work done to explain a particular smriti is called a commentary.
D. Commentaries were composed in the period immediately after 200 AD.
E. Digests were mainly written after that and incorporated and explained material
from all the Smritis.
F. Some of the commentaries were, Manubhashya, Manutika, and Mitakshara.
G. While the most important digest is Jimutvahan’s Dayabhaga which is applicable
in the Bengal and Orissa area.
H. “Mitakshara” literally means “New Word” and is the paramount source of law in all
of India. It is a very exhaustive treatise of law and incorporates and irons out
contradictions existing in Smritis.
I. The Dayabhaga and Mitakshara are the two major schools of Hindu law.
J. The Dayabhaga School of law is based on the commentaries of Jimutvahana and
the Mitakshara is based on the commentaries written by Vijnaneshwar on the
Code of Yajnavalkya.
5. Principles of equity, justice and good conscience
A. Our judicial system greatly relies on being impartial. True justice can only be
delivered through equity and good conscience.
B. Not every kind of fact or situation that arises, can have a corresponding law
governing it. The Courts cannot refuse to settle the dispute in the absence of law
and they are under an obligation to decide such a case also.
C. For determining such cases, the Courts rely upon the basic values, norms, and
standards of fair play and propriety. This is known as principles of justice, equity,
and good conscience.
D. They may also be termed Natural law.
E. In Kanchava v. Girimalappa, (before the passing of the Hindu Succession Act,
1956) it was laid down by the Privy Council that the murderer was disqualified
from inheriting the property of the victim.
The rule of English Law was applied to Hindus on grounds of justice, equity, and
good conscience, and this was statutorily recognized in the Hindu Succession
Act of 1956.
6. Precedent:
A. The doctrine of stare decisis started in India under British rule.
B. All cases are now recorded and new cases are decided based on existing case
laws.
C. The doctrine of precedent based on the principle of treating cases alike was
established.
D. Today, the judgement of the SC is binding on all courts across India (article 141)
and the judgement of the HC is binding on all courts in that state, except where
they have been modified or altered by the Supreme Court whose decisions are
binding on all the Courts except for itself.
7. Legislations
A. Legislations are Acts of Parliament which have been playing a profound role in
the formation of Hindu law.
B. The Legislations have the effect of reforming the law and in certain respects have
superseded the textual law.
C. After India achieved independence, some important aspects of Hindu Law have
been codified. Few examples are The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, The Hindu
Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, The
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, etc.
D. After codification, any point dealt with by the codified law is final.
E. The enactment overrides all prior law.
F. In matters not specifically covered by the codified law, the old textual law
contains application.
8. .
Effects of migration
1. Although it was held in Moolchand v. Marita Bai that personal law moves with whom it
covers, however, it is important to know that migration plays a huge role in determining
what school of thought governs a person.
2. From case laws, the conclusion that can be drawn is that where a Hindu migrates, he is
likely to be governed by the school of thought predominant within his new location.
3. He, therefore, has the option to adopt the law of the new place where he resides – this
was held in Notraz v. Sunbathing Raya.
4. However, before this can be obtainable, there must be an actual migration. A mere
temporary relocation does not count.
5. As observed in Keshavarao v. Swadeshrao, migration is moving to another place. If a
place is divided into two administrative areas, that will not be regarded as migration.
6. In Gope v. Manjura Goralin, it was held that the burden of proving migration lies on him
who pleads.
Christian law
1. Section 4 of Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 specifies that any marriage between
Christians, including a marriage where one of the parties is a Christian, must be
solemnised according to the provisions of the Act else it shall be considered as void.
2. Section 60 of the Act specifies the following conditions for a valid Christian marriage:
A. the groom must not be below 21 years of age and the bride must not be below 18
years of age;
B. neither of the parties must have a spouse still living at the time of marriage;
C. The marriage ceremony must take place in presence of the person licensed
under section 9 and at least two credible witnesses.
3. In Gnanasoundari vs. Nallathambi and Others, the Madras HC clarified that section
88 of the Act shall cover prohibitions based on blood relations and affinity.
Essential conditions
1. It was Prophet Mohammad who brought a complete change in the status of women. He
advocated for almost equal rights for women in the exercise of all legal powers and
functions.
2. In pre-Islamic Arabia, women were treated as movable possession of men and were not
given any right of inheritance, and were totally dependent on men
3. Marriage or ‘nikah’ under Muslim law bears much resemblance to a civil contract.
4. Its essential conditions involve:
A. A clear offer and acceptance, which must be given in the same meeting
B. A consideration from the husband’s side to the wife’s known as mehr or mahr,
C. Between parties competent to contract
D. Following Islam as a religion, or even those devoted to similar scriptures in the
Sunni sect
5. This is subject to certain prohibitions under the law, such as:
A. Bar to marriage during the period of iddat
B. Bar by Consanguinity
C. Bar by Affinity
6. Offer and acceptance
A. In Abdul Kadir v. Salima: An offer is called ijab in Muslim law and an
acceptance is called qubul. Hence, a marriage is similar to a contract
B. The offer is made by the husband. It can be either made by the man or a person
who has been authorised by the man
C. since a Muslim marriage is a contract, it is allowed to have certain pre-conditions
to the marriage and on the fulfillment of the same, the marriage can be accepted
by both the parties.
D. These terms and conditions should be in consonance with legal principles and
public policy.
E. These terms and conditions are to ensure that the rights of the woman in the
marriage are safeguarded. Because, the man has the right to divorce the woman
by way of talaq which is wider in effect than a Muslim woman’s right to divorce,
called ‘khula’.
F. the man or someone on his behalf and the woman or someone on her behalf
needs to give their acceptance to the marriage. This needs to be taken in the
presence of at least one male and two female witnesses who should be adult,
sane Mohammedan.
G. The Shia sect of Muslims does not mandatorily require the norm of witnesses
H. Moreover, if there is no witness to the marriage, it becomes a mere irregularity
and not invalidation.
I. acceptance can also be made by way of accepting the dower.
J. the offer and acceptance must occur in the same meeting.
K. offer of marriage should begin the marriage immediately i.e., an offer of marrying
someone the next month is not a valid offer.
7. Consideration
A. woman must receive as a matter of right, a sum of money from the husband’s
side called mehr or dower.
B. According to the prophet, this dower is a form of honour and respect given to a
woman when she agrees to marry a man by way of accepting the dower.
C. The practical purpose is to ensure the financial security of the woman in and after
marriage.
D. The right to the dower of a woman can be exerted before cohabitation.
E. Nasra Begum v. Rizwan Ali: a woman’s family can refuse to send her to her
matrimonial home if dower is not given. Once the dower is accepted by the
woman, she in return agrees to marry the man. Therefore, the contract is
complete.
8. Competency of parties
A. Two factors decide the competency: the age, and soundness of mind.
B. Once the girl and boy have attained puberty, they become competent to be a
party to the institution of marriage.
C. This also means that when the girl and the boy are sexually competent to
consummate a marriage, they are allowed.
D. Hence, difficult to ascertain the exact age at which it would be a valid marriage.
E. Throughout history, the usual age is 9 for a girl and 12 for a boy.
F. In Muhammad Ibrahim v. Atkia Begum & Anr. has set the maximum age at
fifteen years and this age criterion applies to both the man and the woman. The
Privy Council gave two conditions:
- Attainment of the age of 15 years of the woman
- Attaintment of puberty, whichever is earlier
G. Once puberty is attained, the power of authorization either by self or to whoever
is accepting on their behalf arises.
H. Soundness of mind, where it must be seen whether it is a case of idiocy, i.e.,
consistent and permanent unsoundness, or lunacy, i.e., acquired unsoundness
with periods of sanity in between.
I. The former is entirely incompetent to contract but the latter may marry by giving
consent in the period of sanity.
J. In the case of a minor or a lunatic person who is not capable to authorise, then
the power of guardians, parents and family can be regarded.
K. The guardians who are allowed to authorise the marriage of a minor are:
- The father
- The paternal grandfather or anyone higher
- Brother
- Mother
- Maternal uncle or aunt or someone from the family.
- But when none of the guardians mentioned above is there, then a qazi or
any government authority can assume the position of a guardian in the
case of a minor child.
L. The offer and acceptance on their behalf can be given by the guardian in the
hierarchy above
9. Religion of the parties
A. Since the marriage will be governed by Muslim laws, it needs to be given a
certain status.
B. However, the rules and sunnah (tradition) differ in the communities of Sunni
Muslims and Shia Muslims
C. Sunni law:
- when a man marries a woman from another sect, then such a marriage is
purely an inter-sect marriage. Such marriages are perfectly valid.
- However, there is a difference when a woman is a Christian or a Jew.
These are called the kitabia communities.
- such marriages are allowed and are valid as well.
- However, if the woman is a non-Muslim and also does not belong to the
kitabia community, then the marriage is a ‘Fasid’. Such marriages are
irregular though they are not void.
- This irregularity can also be done away with if the woman converts into a
Muslim woman. Thereby, the irregularity is removed and the marriage
automatically becomes a valid marriage.
D. Shia law:
- The Shia man traditionally can only marry a Muslim girl.
- this would include inter-sect marriage.
- Shia man cannot marry a kitabi or a Hindu girl.
- And if such marriage takes place, then it automatically becomes void in
Muslim law.
- However, if the girl converts into a Muslim, this deformity can be removed.
- Shia law allows muta marriages. Muta marriage is one that is temporary
or for a limited period of time.
10. Free consent
A. For a valid marriage, the free consent of the parties is a must.
B. If the consent is obtained by means of coercion, fraud, or mistake of fact, it is
considered invalid and the marriage is considered void.
C. Mohiuddin v. Khatijabibi: a marriage is invalid if it is held without the free
consent of the parties.
11. Certain Prohibitions to Marriage
A. Marriage during Iddat
- Iddat is a time period after the divorce or death of the husband in which
the wife is not allowed to marry anyone else.
- The purpose behind this is to see whether the woman remains pregnant
with that husband’s child or not, so as to avoid any doubts regarding
parentage.
- The period is 3 months in case of divorce, and 4 lunar months and 10
days in case of death.
- The status of marriage entered into during iddat differs in the case of the
Sunni and the Shia sects of Muslims.
- The Sunni men are not allowed to marry during the iddat period.
- However, if they do, then the marriage shall assume the status of a mere
irregularity and the validity of such a marriage cannot really be
questioned. What this means is that the marriage will be deemed as
invalid till the irregularity, i.e., till the period of iddat exists and upon its
end, the irregularity will be removed and the marriage will become valid.
- In the Shia sect, men are prohibited to marry during the iddat period. If a
man does so, then such a marriage is considered void. This disability
cannot be removed. It needs to be highlighted that the period of iddat is
only for a specific period of time.
- As soon as the expiry of this period, the women are allowed to remarry
and there is no prohibition or restriction for the same either in the Sunni
sect or in the Shia sect.
B. Consanguinity:
- Marriage between people within the prohibited degree of blood relation is
barred in Muslim law as well.
- This means that marriage between people in blood relation up to a certain
number of generations is invalid.
C. Affinity:
- Some other relationships are also considered void based on the
closeness of the relationship. For example, a man cannot marry his wife’s
grandmother.
- Similarly, relationships based on fosterage are also barred to some
extent.
- A man cannot marry one’s foster grandmother or foster sister.
- Under Sunni law, some relationships in fosterage are allowed. In the Shia
sect, fosterage and consanguinity are on the same pedestal and both
render a marriage invalid.
D.
12.
Void and Voidable marriages
1. Sahih Nikah (Valid Marriage) Batil Nikah (Void Marriage) Fasid Nikah (Irregular
Marriage) Muta Marriage
2. Sahih Nikah (Valid Marriage):
A. sahih is an Urdu term for the word ‘correct’ or ‘valid’
B. When all the essential conditions of a Muslim marriage are duly fulfilled
C. social and legal implications of a valid marriage
- The spouses become legally married owing to which they can legally
consummate their marriage.
- parties acquire the rights of inheritance over the properties which can be
inherited.
- the wife has to right to alimony and maintenance for her and the children.
- The right to maintenance is an independent right beside the right to
receive the promised dower.
- The spouses have to be loyal and faithful to each other.
- However, a Muslim man is allowed to commit polygamy
- The Quran allows a man to reprimand or chastise his wife by reasonable
means if the wife is disobedient or disloyal towards him.
- The kids, if any, who are born due to the consummation of a sahih
marriage are considered to be legitimate children.
- In case of the wife being a widow or being divorced by her husband, she
is obliged under the Muslim law to perform the ritual of Iddat
D.
3. Batil Nikah (Void Marriage)
A. According to the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an agreement that is not legally
enforceable is a void agreement.
B. Similarly, an agreement between a prospective bride and a groom which does
not meet all the essential conditions of a Muslim marriage is a void agreement
and any marriage that takes place in furtherance of a void agreement is called a
void marriage or Batil nikah.
C. In Munshi v. Mst. Alam Bibi, when there is a permanent or perpetual prohibition
from marriage due to non-adherence of a condition, it is void marriage.
D. When one or more of the prerequisites to a valid marriage mentioned above are
not fulfilled by the spouses before marriage, the marriage is void and not binding.
E. The following are certain situations in which a Muslim marriage is void:
- When a marriage takes place between persons who are absolutely
incapable.
- When a person marries the wife of another man when the marriage of the
lady was subsisting.
- Marrying more than four wives. In such a case, the fifth marriage and so
on becomes void.
- Marriage with a Non-Muslim.
- In Tanjela Bibi v. Bajrul Sheikh, a marriage with a woman who is
pregnant from before the marriage is void.
- mere examples and not an exhaustive list of void marriages.
F. The essential social and legal implications of void marriage are:
- The marriage is void-ab-initio, i.e. void from the very first day of the
marriage even if the marriage is consummated.
- A void marriage does entitle the parties to any legal right or bestow any
legal duties upon them.
- If the marriage turns out to be void, the right to receive maintenance after
divorce is lost.
- The kids, if any, born from the consummation of a void marriage are
considered illegitimate and have no right of succession or inheritance.
- The spouses do not require to obtain a decree of divorce in case of void
marriages. They can simply part without any legal formalities.
4. Fasid Nikah (Irregular Marriage)
A. In Ata Mohammed. v. Saiqul Bibi, when a marriage is temporarily prohibited
and not certainly restricted it is merely irregular or fasid and not void.
B. Irregular marriages exist only in the case of Sunni Muslims
C. an irregular marriage, under Shia law, is void marriage.
D. When a marriage is conducted by violating certain or partial conditions of a valid
marriage, it is called an irregular marriage.
E. The best instance of an irregular marriage is the marriage between a Muslim and
a Christian or a Jew.
F. an irregular marriage is voidable marriage and not void-ab-initio.
G. If the irregularity can be removed from an irregular marriage, the marriage
becomes valid when it is removed.
H. So, if a Muslim man of the Sunni sect marries a Jewish woman but gets her
converted to Islam, the marriage is valid.
I. The social and legal implications of an irregular marriage depend upon the
question of whether the marriage was consummated or not.
J. Implications if the marriage is not consummated:
- wife has no right to receive a dower from the husband in case he divorces
- The wife is not bound to follow the rule of iddat
- wife has no right to claim maintenance from the husband during the iddat
period of three months.
- If the irregular marriage is consummated and results in the birth of
children, the children will be considered legitimate and shall have all rights
of inheritance of properties.
- Those marriages which are irregular under Sunni law are void under Shia
Law.
- However, under Shia Law marriage contracted without witnesses is valid.
it is not void.
5. Muta marriages
A. occurs only in Shia Muslims and not Sunni
B. Most of the Arabian countries have Shia sects of Muslims. The people usually
called the Sheikhs were involved in the business of oil-producing, refining and
exporting. Due to business agreements, they were required to travel far places
and stay there for several days or even months.
C. During this period, the Sheikhs were required to fulfil their sexual needs and
desires but, however, Islam does not allow cohabitation with any woman other
than a person’s own wife. Therefore, the Sheikhs used to marry the women for a
temporary period till they were in that town and at the time of leaving, they get
divorced and the dower was paid as the consideration for marrying.
D. recognized in Muslim personal law by the Shia sect and is called Muta marriage.
E. temporary marriage between a Shia Muslim man and a woman of Islam, Jew or
Christian religion for a fixed period of time and in return of the payment of a fixed
amount of dower at the time of divorce.
F. The time period and the dower must be informed and accepted by the bride as
well.
G. This marriage is not followed in Sunni Muslims which consider marriage to be a
permanent union and not a temporary affair.
H.
6.
Unisex marriage
1. The right to marriage is considered a human right. However, there exists no law nor any
legislation which legally enforces such right of transgenders. They were given a hope
when Supreme Court delivered the NALSA judgement, ie, National Legal Services
Authority v. Union of India & Ors.. It was the first attempt to legally recognize their
gender and the fundamental rights which conferred to all irrespective of an individual’s
sex.
2. Olga Tellis and Ors. v. Bombay Municipal Corporation and Ors held, Article 21
confers freedom of life and liberty, which doesn’t merely amount to physical existence
but a qualitative and meaningful life with dignity.
3. Although the right to marry according to one’s will have been recognized as a
fundamental right the current scenario doesn’t allows homosexuals to exercise their
rights.
4. Various advantages which are available to heterosexual couples like maintenance,
succession, pension rights are denied to homosexual couples.
5. After the decision in Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation which upheld
constitutional validity of section 377 of Indian Penal Code criminalising carnal intercourse
against nature’s order, most of the arguments have focused around the efficient ways to
overturn the decision of the court.
6. Discrimination on the basis of sex is violative of our fundamental rights enshrined under
Article 15. Sex includes sexual orientation within it and discrimination based on an
individual’s sexual orientation is objectionable under criminal as well as civil laws.
7. The current legislations on personal laws only recognizes heterosexual marriages, which
undoubtedly denies homosexual couples of the legal and social recognition as well as
the benefits which is conferred by these legislations to married people.
8. Most personal laws describe marriage as sacrament and union of two souls between
individuals belonging to different sex. Same sex relationships are considered grossly
immoral and violative of custom and religious beliefs.
9. The Rigveda mentions, ‘Vikriti Evam Prakriti’ which means what seems to be unnatural
is also natural.
I. Under Hindu Marriage Act
1. Hindu Marriage Act governs the marriage and related aspects like divorce etc, of
any two individuals belonging to the Hindu religion. It is applicable to any other
person who is by religion Jain, Buddhist or Sikh within the territory of India
2. The Hindu Marriage Act very specifically states that at the time of marriage the
bridegroom must be of twenty-one years of age bride of eighteen years of age. A
similar provision is made in the Christian Marriage Act using the term man and
woman. Almost every Indian personal law considers marriage as union of
heterosexuals. However, same sex marriages are not expressly prohibited Hindu
Marriage Act.
3. Approaches to accommodate same sex marriage
A. One person identifies as the groom, the other as the bride. This is against
the rules of interpretation of statute.
B. recognise LGBT community as a separate community, one which have its
own customs and practices allowing same sex marriage.
C. interpretating the Act in such a manner so as to allow same sex marriage.
If not, then the Act may be held unconstitutional on the ground it
discriminates on basis of sex and denies them of their basic right.
D. make desired amendments in the respective personal laws: controversial
4. Hindu Marriage Act says “Union of spirits”, “between 2 hindus” and does not have
any express prohibition which allows accommodative interpretation
II. Under Special Marriage Act
1. The Special Marriage Act, 1954 allows for a special type of marriage between
parties irrespective of their faith and religion who don’t wish to be bound by their
personal laws.
2. An alternative which ought not to incite religious hatred is make amendment in
the Special Marriage Act to facilitate same-sex marriages.
3. Marriages under this Act don't require religious rites and practices to be
performed for a valid marriage unlike marriages under Hindu Marriage Act.
4. However, the current form of the Act is only applicable to heterosexual couple as
it describes the age criteria by using words such as “male” and “female”.
5. To incorporate homosexual marriages under the Act an amendment to section 4
(c) is required or it may add a specific provision to expressly allow the same.
6. The decision of Naz Foundation stressed on Article 15 of the Constitution which
prohibits discrimination on the ground of caste, race, sex, religion and place of
birth. The court observed that the term “sex” in Article 15 included sexual
orientation within it. Several foreign judgments were cited in this case for
supporting the propositions. It will be discriminating and violative of Article 15
against homosexual couples if the legislation and personal laws prohibited them
based on their sexual orientation.
7. Hence, it’s clear that if Special Marriage Act permitted same sex marriages, an
argument could have been made.
8. In the case of Shakti Vahini v. Union of India and others the court held that the
right to choose a partner is a fundamental right.
9.
Living together
1. There is no particular law as specified with regards to “live-in relationships” in India and
no enactments to define the rights and liabilities of the partners cohabiting in a live-in
relationship.
2. There is no particular law as specified with regards to live-in relationships in India and no
enactments to define the rights and liabilities of the partners cohabiting in a live-in
relationship. The law is unclear on this but over the period live-in relationships have been
recognized by the courts. The legal recognition of live-in relationships was for the first
time acknowledged in the Protection of Women from the Domestic Violence Act, 2005
extending protection to those women who are not legally married but living with a male
individual in a relationship. Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, lays down that, the
court may presume the existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have happened,
regard being given to the common course of natural events, human conduct, and public
and private business, in a relationship as to the facts of the particular case. Therefore,
where a man and a lady live respectively for a long spell of time as a couple then there
would be an assumption of marriage. Where independent evidence of solemnization of
marriage is not available, it will be presumed to be a valid marriage by continuous
cohabitation between the parties unless the contrary is proved. It was held in Madan
Mohan Singh v. Rajni Kant[12] by the Supreme Court that law presumes in favour of
marriage against concubinage. Therefore, going by the principle, where a man and a
woman have cohabited for a long time they are presumed to be married. It has been also
observed that a long-continued live-in relationship cannot be just a walk-in-and-walk-out
relationship and children out of such relationships are legitimate. It was held in Anandi v.
Onkar[13] that, if a community of neighbours treats a couple as husband a wife, they are
thus reputed to be married and the burden of proof that they were not properly married
lies on the party asserting so. In a landmark judgment of S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal,
The Supreme Court broadened the horizons and held, that live-in relationships come
within the ambit of the right of life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and
recognized it as a permissible act of two major living together which cannot be
considered illegal or unlawful.
3. In the case of Indira Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma(2013), 15 SCC 755 the Supreme Court
observed that a live-in or marriage-like relationship is neither a crime nor a sin though
socially unacceptable in the country. The decision to marry or not marry or to have a
heterosexual relationship is intensely personal. In this case, the court gave out five
categories of life in relationships which can be considered and proved in the court: ▪
Domestic relationship between an adult unmarried man and an adult unmarried woman.
▪ A domestic relationship between a married man and an adult unmarried woman
entered willingly. ▪ A domestic relationship between an adult unmarried man and a
married woman entered willingly. This kind of relationship was punishable under IPC
section 497-adultery but this section has been deemed unconstitutional since 2018. It is
still a ground to get divorced. ▪ A domestic relationship between a married man and an
adult unmarried woman entered unknowingly. ▪ Domestic relationships between
same-sex partners
4. In the case of Tulsa & Ors v. Durghatiya (2008), while referring to Section 114 of the
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 the court held that the provisions under the said section refer
to a common course of natural events, human conduct, and private business. The court
shall presume the existence of facts that are likely to have happened. While interpreting
Sections 50 and Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 combinedly, it is evident
that the act of marriage is to be presumed from the view of the common course of
natural events. In a landmark judgment of Dhannu Lal v. Ganeshram(2015), the
Supreme Court decided that couples living in live-in relationships will be presumed
legally married. It was also held that the woman in the relationship would be eligible to
inherit the property after the death of her partner.
5. Validity of living together and legitimacy of a child born out of them
A. There is no particular law as specified with regards to “live-in relationships” in
India and no enactments to define the rights and liabilities of the partners
cohabiting in a live-in relationship.
B. The legal recognition of live-in relationships was for the first time acknowledged
in the Protection of Women from the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 extending
protection to those women who are not legally married but living with a male
individual in a relationship.
C. S114 of the Indian Evidence Act:
Where a man and a lady live respectively for a long spell of time as a couple then
there would be an assumption of marriage. Where independent evidence of
solemnization of marriage is not available, it will be presumed to be a valid
marriage by continuous cohabitation between the parties unless the contrary is
proved
D. S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal: living together comes under the ambit of Art 21
E. Indira Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma: 5 categories of live in relationships
- Domestic relationship between an adult unmarried man and an adult
unmarried woman.
- A domestic relationship between a married man and an adult unmarried
woman entered willingly.
- A domestic relationship between an adult unmarried man and a married
woman entered willingly. This kind of relationship was punishable under
IPC section 497-adultery but this section has been deemed
unconstitutional since 2018. It is still a ground to get divorced.
- A domestic relationship between a married man and an adult unmarried
woman entered unknowingly.
- Domestic relationships between same-sex partners.
F. Dhannu Lal v. Ganeshram: couples in live-in relationships will be presumed
legally married. It was also held that the woman in the relationship would be
eligible to inherit the property after the death of her partner.
G. Bharatha Matha v. R Vijay Renganathan: children born through live-in relations
will be considered legitimate children and will be allowed share in the ancestral
undivided property.
6. .
Dowry
1. There is a thin line difference between gifts given under pressure and gifts given out of
good faith, and luckily, we don’t have to use the same word for both of them. Gifts given
under pressure, abuse or in a form of agreement for wedding amounts to dowry but gifts
given in good faith, without any undue-influence are treated as streedhan. It includes any
form of gift or valuables that are only given to the bride. Streedhan is also in accordance
with the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The husband or his relatives can be held liable in
case they deny to return this when the time comes under Section 405 and 406 of Indian
Penal Code. Even the courts have ensured that no woman should be denied her right
over Streedhan.
2. Dowry is defined, in simple words, as any form of money, goods or estate that a woman
brings at the time of marriage to her husband’s house
3. Gifts given under pressure, abuse or in a form of agreement for wedding amounts to
dowry but gifts given in good faith, without any undue-influence are treated as
streedhan.
4. In Pratibha Rani vs. Suraj Kumar case, the honourable Supreme court held that a
woman has every right over her Streedhan.
5. In Pandurang Shivram Kawathkar v. the State of Maharashtra, the SC held that
merely demand without any exchange of dowry amounts to an offence under Section 4
of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
6. In Bhoora Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, a wife was being ill-treated and even set on
fire. She wrote letters to her father explaining her condition and mentioning her inlaws’
demands for dowry. The court held that the husband and his family members were liable
under Section 4 of the Act.
7. Section 304(B) of IPC deals with matters of dowry deaths. If a wife dies within seven
years of the marriage with any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise under normal
circumstances and it is shown that she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her
husband or any relative of her husband or in connection with, for any demand of dowry,
such death will be considered as ‘dowry death’
8. They can be punished for imprisonment for seven years which may extend to
imprisonment for life.
9.
CHRISTIAN
10. A person professing Christian religion can get a divorce under the Divorce Act, 1869.
The act is applicable if one of the parties to the marriage is a Christian and the marriage
can be dissolved by bypassing a decree by the court under the Act.
11. The grounds provided by the Act for dissolution of a marriage under Section 10
12. The parties to the marriage can also file a petition together for seeking divorce by mutual
consent under Section 10-B on the ground that they have mutually agreed to divorce
after living separately for a period of two years or more and have not been able to live
together.
13. Under the Indian Divorce Act (Christian marriages), the parties need to live separately
for at least two years before filing the mutual consent petition.
14. The parties need to come to court twice – first to file the petition, and then six months
after the filing of the petition to record their evidence. This six-month period is known as
the “cooling off period”, for the parties to re-consider and think about their decision to
separate.
15. In 2017, the Supreme Court held that if parties have already been separated for over
one-and-a-half years (two-and-a-half years for Christian marriages), and do not wish to
wait for six months, they may be permitted to waive this six month waiting period after
fulfilling certain formalities.
16. In Saumya Ann Thomas vs. The Union of India, the court further held that the “two
year” period in the section 10A(1) of the Divorce Act, shall be read down to a period of
“one year”. It made an exception for the christian couple.
17. Same was followed in Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors.
In camera proceedings
1. Section 11 in The Family Courts Act, 1984: Proceedings to be held in camera.-In every
suit or proceedings to which this Act applies, the proceedings may be held in camera if
the Family Court so desires and shall be held if either party so desires.
2. ‘in-camera’ proceeding is a proceeding carried out in private, in the absence of the public
and the press.
3. Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justice A.M. Khanwilkar on Monday agreed that
matrimonial disputes should be conducted in camera in the spirit of Section 11 of the
Family Courts Act of 1984 and video conferencing would destroy the privacy of the
proceedings and probably defeat the cause of justice.
Domestic violence
1. According to the United Nations, domestic abuse or violence means a relationship in
which a pattern of behaviour is used to gain power or dominance over an intimate
partner.
2. Abuse can be physical, economical, sexual, emotional or psychological. Also, a
dominative behaviour includes any act which frightens, hurts, humiliates, terrorizes,
injures, blames or wounds someone.
3. It can happen to anyone irrespective of race, gender, age or sexual orientation.
4. In India, we do not consider men to be the victims of domestic violence. Though in
different cases, respected courts have ruled that cruelty against men is a valid ground for
divorce, they do not consider it to be domestic abuse.
5. In Sanjay Yadav v. Anita Yadav, Bombay Hc ruled in favour of the husband and granted
divorce on the grounds of cruelty but the wife’s act did not amount to domestic abuse
which it would have if the scenario was opposite.
THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005
6. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was enacted by the
Parliament of India to provide for more effective protection of the rights of women
guaranteed under the Constitution who are victims of violence of any kind occurring
within the family and other related incidents.
7. Domestic violence: harms or injures or endangers the health, safety, life, limb or
well-being of the aggrieved person
8. Its a human right violation
9. Abuse maybe physical, sexual, verbal or emotional and economic
10. Salient features:
A. Recognising that a woman requires assistance with legal procedures and other
forms of support, the PWDVA allows for the appointment of Protection Officers
B. recognises the role of Service Providers in providing medical, shelter, legal,
counselling and other kinds of support services.
C. provides only temporary and emergency relief.
D. law in response to the needs of the woman.
E. It has certain crossovers from civil to criminal law – so when the protection order
or Magistrate’s order is violated, the criminal law will start.
F. The shelter homes and the medical facility are under a legal obligation to provide
shelter or medical facility to the aggrieved person.
G. The Act does not make any changes in the existing personal law regime on
family matters.
H. Having obtained relief under the law, a woman can still go for relief under other
laws later.
I. The Act includes provisions for making Domestic Incident Reports, which will
serve as important records at the stage of evidence taking.
J. the Act provides that the breach of an order obtained is a criminal offence
11. A child is also entitled to relief under the Domestic Violence Act.
Iddat period
1. Iddat is a time period after the divorce or death of the husband in which the wife (widow
or divorcee) is not allowed to marry anyone else.
2. The purpose behind this is to see whether the woman remains pregnant with that
husband’s child or not, so as to avoid any doubts regarding parentage.
3. The period is 3 months in case of divorce, and 4 lunar months and 10 days in case of
death.
4. The Sunni men are not allowed to marry during the iddat period. However, if they do,
then the marriage shall assume the status of a mere irregularity and the validity of such a
marriage cannot really be questioned.
5. What this means is that the marriage will be deemed as invalid till the irregularity, i.e., till
the period of iddat exists and upon its end, the irregularity will be removed and the
marriage will become valid.
6. In the Shia sect, men are prohibited to marry during the iddat period. If a man does so,
then such a marriage is considered void. This disability cannot be removed.
7. Iddat is only for a specific period of time. As soon as the expiry of this period, the women
are allowed to remarry and there is no prohibition or restriction for the same either in the
Sunni sect or in the Shia sect.
8. Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Women (Protection Of- Rights On Divorce) Act, 1986
lays down that a divorced Muslim woman is entitled to a reasonable and fair provision
and maintenance to be made and paid to her within the iddat period by her former
husband
- The Shruti comprise the four Vedas (Rig-Veda, Sum-Veda, Yajur-Veda and
Atharva-Veda), the six Vedangas and eighteen Upanishads.
- The rules laid down in Smritis can be divided into three categories viz. Achar (relating to
morality), Vyavahar (signifying procedural and substantive rules which the King or the
State applied for settling disputes in the adjudication of justice) and Prayaschit (signifying
the penal provision for commission of a wrong).
- Dharmasutras are written in prose, in short maxims (Sutras). Dharmashastras are written
in poetry (Shlokas)
- Customs are superior to written law and are of 4 types: Local, family, Caste and
Community and guild. Min 40 years to be considered ancient.
- Commentaries (Tika or Bhashya) explained a particular smriti. Ex Manubhashya,
Manutika, and Mitakshara.
- Digests (Nibandhs) Ex Jimutvahan’s Dayabhaga
- Our judicial system greatly relies on being impartial. True justice can only be delivered
through equity and good conscience. AKA natural law, rely upon the basic values,
norms, and standards of fair play and propriety.
- Precedent: The doctrine of stare decisis + Article 141 (SC is binding on all courts)
- Legislations are Acts of Parliament. Ex. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, The Hindu
Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, The Hindu
Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.
A.
5. Legality and consequences of Unisex marriage:
A. Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation upheld constitutional validity of section
377 of Indian Penal Code criminalising carnal intercourse against nature’s order
B. The Rigveda mentions, ‘Vikriti Evam Prakriti’ which means what seems to be
unnatural is also natural.
C. Hindu marriage Act: talks about groom and bride but also does not expressly
prohibit unisex marriages
D. An alternative which ought not to incite religious hatred is make amendment in
the Special Marriage Act to facilitate same-sex marriages. Currently, it makes
provisions for heterosexual marriages only.
E. In the case of Shakti Vahini v. Union of India and others the court held that the
right to choose a partner is a fundamental right.