Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2017 Hok Design Annual
2017 Hok Design Annual
2 0 1 7
HOK
2 0 1 7
Published by ORO Editions
Publishers of Architecture, Art, and Design
Publisher: Gordon Goff
www.oroeditions.com
info@oroeditions.com
You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.
PREFACE
“Achieving great design with technical Achieving great design with technical excellence
excellence means setting bold design means setting bold aspirations that are achieved
by independent thinking, building science and
aspirations ...”
sound judgment—all supported by a collaborative
team and advanced digital technology. We
Great design is realized at the intersection of
provide the best service to both our contractual
art, craft and science. Technical excellence is
and extended clients by realizing great designs
critical to that realization and it is important
that are enjoyed by those who experience them,
that everyone understands the difference
and whose elegant expression is informed by
between technical competence and technical
intelligence, efficiency and craft.
excellence, as well as the importance of each
to our aspirations for our constantly developing
The 2017 Design Annual illustrates a diverse
practice.
range of building typologies and scales, from
concepts to completed works that exemplify the
Technical competence is essential to the delivery
integration of design ambition with technical
of good projects and forms the foundation
excellence. The places and spaces we create
of our professional responsibilities: code
combine imagination and knowledge to make the
compliance, interdisciplinary coordination, good
world a better place. Ours is a constant endeavor
specifications, clear documents and effective
to evolve and improve, informed by optimism and
construction phase services.
the thrill of creative effort.
AVIATION + TRANSPORTATION LaGuardia Airport Central Terminal B New York, New York, USA 12 HEALTHCARE Center for Academic Medicine for Confidential Client California, USA 220
New LaGuardia Airport Master Plan New York, New York, USA 38 Ng Teng Fong General and Jurong Community Hospitals Jurong, Singapore 236
COMMERCIAL 1101 16th Street NW Washington, D.C., USA 54 HOSPITALITY Fogo de Chao Brazilian Steakhouse San Francisco, California, USA 248
The Allen Mixed-Use Development Houston, Texas, USA 64 Jacob K. Javits Convention Center Design Competition New York, New York, USA 256
Ghirardelli Square Plaza San Francisco, California, USA 78
Mixed-Use Development Design Competition Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 88 JUSTICE Davidson County Criminal Justice Center Nashville, Tennessee, USA 274
Our Urban Midwest Chicago, Illinois, USA 100
Tower Design Competition Sydney, Australia 114 PRODUCT DESIGN Scientific Lab Furniture System 288
CORPORATE Bentall Kennedy Office Toronto, Ontario, Canada 128 RESIDENTIAL 633 S. LaSalle Street Tower Chicago, Illinois, USA 296
Corporate Amenities Building for Confidential Client Texas, USA 136 Sutton Place Design Competition New York, New York, USA 304
Dairy Farmers of America Headquarters Kansas City, Kansas, USA 146
Dentsu Aegis Network Office Los Angeles, California, USA 160 SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY Education Building for Confidential Client California, USA 316
Polsinelli Offices Dallas, Texas, USA / Denver, Colorado, USA 168 The Francis Crick Institute London, UK 326
White & Case Office New York, New York, USA 184 Medical Research Building for Confidential Client California, USA 348
University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine Tampa, Florida, USA 358
CULTURAL Al Fozan Mosque Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia 196
Nile Valley Aquaponics Facility Kansas City, Missouri, USA 206 SPORTS + RECREATION + Major League Soccer Stadium St. Louis, Missouri, USA 368
ENTERTAINMENT Miami Dolphins Hard Rock Stadium Miami, Florida, USA 376
GOVERNMENT Central Bank of Kuwait Headquarters Kuwait City, Kuwait 212
PROJECT LOCATIONS
HOK 2017 Design Annual Projects
HOK Office
Tower Design
Competition
AVIATION +
TRANSPORTATION
13
departures hall concept LAGUARDIA
AIRPORT
CENTRAL TERMINAL B
New York, New York, USA
CONCEPT
1. terminal layout
2.
3.
“The design is intended as a commentary on the contemporary expectation of air travel—a celebration of
view from departures road
movement utilizing an architecture of transparency and fluidity. The terminal is a civic building serving as a noble
welcome to New York. In the spirit of the city’s great high-rises like the Woolworth and Chrysler buildings, which in
their time were considered cathedrals of commerce, we see the new terminal as a cathedral of mobility.”
1.
2.
20 21
SECTION
1. north-south section
2. east-west section
1.
2.
1. feature wall study model 2. arrivals level
24 25
1. pedestrian bridges + airfield 2. concessions + bridge floor
2.
1.
pedestrian bridge
28 29
1. pedestrian bridge + headhouse connection 2. departures hall
30 31
1. pedestrian bridge structural model 2. concourse entry
headhouse view of airfield
34 35
1. departures hall 2. departures floor
2.
1.
aerial view of central terminal b
AVIATION +
TRANSPORTATION
39
conceptual aerial view looking east NEW
LAGUARDIA
AIRPORT
MASTER PLAN
New York, New York, USA
CONCEPT
A. concourse a
B. concourse b
C. west parking garage
D. terminal b
E. central hall
F. grand central parkway
G. concourse d
H. concourse e
I. concourse f
J. concourse g
K. concourse connector
G
L. east parking garage H
M. terminal c
A B
I
J
00
-9
737
D E
L
M
�
VAN
��
DN
C
44 45
SITE STRATEGY 2. redefined airside/landside boundary
3.2.1 CORE
3.2 GATE AREA REDEVELOPMENT
TERMINAL AREA Tab
3.2 CORE
TERMINAL B TERMINAL AREA
The Redevelopment
3.2.1 GATE AREA of Terminals
REDEVELOPMENT B and C involves moving the terminals closer to
Tab
Grand Central Parkway to provide increased airside operational areas; the basic
3.2.1
TERMINAL
premise of this
GATE AREA REDEVELOPMENT
B approach being a recognized need to improve the flow of aircraft Tab
Nu
TERMINAL
traffic
The on the B
Redevelopment airfieldof and apron parking
Terminals B and C areas.
involves moving the terminals closer to
Grand
The Central Parkway
Redevelopment to provideBincreased
of Terminals and C involvesairside operational
moving areas; the
the terminals basic
closer to
An
premise
Grand island-gate
Central concept
of thisParkway
approachto for Terminal
being
provide B of 35 gates
a recognized
increased need to
airsidewill providethe
improve
operational increased
flow of
areas; aircraft
the basic Nu
Nu
maneuverability
traffic
premise onofthethis and flexibility
airfield
approach beingfor
and apron aircraft
aparking
recognized movements
areas. around the
need to improve the flow
terminal for the
of aircraft
multiple Nu
traffic onairlines and numerous
the airfield and apronaircraftparkingtypesareas.operating at LaGuardia Airport. With the
elimination
An island-gate of dead-end
concept for alleyways,
Terminalaircraft
B of 35operation
gates willatprovide
Terminal B will have flow-
increased De
Nu
through
maneuverability
An island-gate capability andwith
concept provide
flexibility for
for Terminal a more
aircraft
B ofefficient
movements
35 gatesoperation
will around andthe
provide reduced
terminal
increased ground delays.
for the
Nu
multiple
maneuverabilityairlines and and numerous
flexibility for aircraft
aircrafttypes operatingaround
movements at LaGuardia
the terminal Airport.
forWith
the the
The 35 gates
elimination at and
Terminal
of dead-end B are aircraft
alleyways, made uptypes
aircraftof operation
17operating
gates on the
at at west B
Terminal most concourse
willAirport.
have flow- RO
De
multiple airlines numerous LaGuardia With the
A,
through and 18
elimination gates
capability onwith
of dead-end the adjacent
provide
alleyways, aconcourse
more B. Each
efficient
aircraft ofatthese
operation
operation andconcourses
Terminal reduced canflow-
ground
B will have delays. De
accommodate
through capability twowithADGprovide
IV aircraft within
a more an otherwise
efficient operation ADG andIIIreduced
fleet. Anground
alternatedelays.
layout
The 35has gatesalsoatbeen developed
Terminal B are madesuch thatup ofall17gates
gates atonTerminal
the west B would accommodate
most concourse RO
as
A, a 35
anddesign
18 aircraft
gates ADG
on the III,
adjacentandmadeno ADG
concourse IV 17
gates.
B. Each In of
this case, and as illustrated in the Figure 3.2: Masterplan, Redefined Airside/Landside Boundary
The gates at Terminal B are up of gates onthese
the concourses
west most can
concourse RO
adjacent
A, and 18Figure
accommodate gates 3.6:
twoonADG New
the IVLaGuardia
aircraft
adjacent Airport
within
concourse anB. Gate Area
otherwise
Each Redevelopment
ADG
of these III fleet. An Plan,
concourses can a total of
alternate
38
layout gates
accommodate hascanalsobe twoaccommodated,
been developed
ADG IV aircraft 19
such gates
that
within allatotherwise
an eachat
gates ofTerminal
the
ADG twoIIIconcourses.
Bfleet.
would Anaccommodate
alternate
as a design aircraft Figure 3.2: Masterplan, Redefined Airside/Landside Boundary
layout has also beenADG III, andsuch
developed no ADG thatIVallgates.
gatesInatthis case, B
Terminal andwouldas illustrated
accommodate in the2.
adjacent Figure
as a design
TERMINAL C 3.6:ADG
aircraft NewIII, LaGuardia
and no ADG Airport Gate Area
IV gates. In thisRedevelopment
case, and as illustratedPlan, a total
in theof Figure 3.2: Masterplan, Redefined Airside/Landside Boundary
38
adjacent gatesFigure
can be3.6: accommodated,
New LaGuardia 19 Airport
gates atGate eachArea
of the two concourses.
Redevelopment Plan, a total of
Terminal C adopts a modified pier layout incorporating dual taxilanes between the
38 gates can be accommodated, 19 gates at each of the two concourses.
concourses, versus the single taxilane operation today. This layout represents the
TERMINAL
most efficientClayout as there is insufficient space to use the island concourse
TERMINAL
concept.
Terminal C Dual Ctaxi alanes
adopts between
modified pier the
layoutconcourses provide
incorporating dual increased
taxilanestaxiing between capacity
the
and
Terminal bypass
concourses, capability
versusathe
C adopts for aircraft
single
modified in
taxilane
pier theoperation
layout terminal area,
today.allowing
incorporating Thistaxilanes
dual layoutfor reduced
represents
betweentaxi-in
the and
the
taxi-out
most
concourses, times
efficient and
layout
versus reduced
as single
the there gate
is delays.operation
insufficient
taxilane Thespace
introduction
to use
today. of
thedual
This island
layout and flow-through
concourse
represents the
taxilanes
concept.
most efficient moretaxi
Dual thanlanes
layout doubles
between
as there the airside areaspace
the concourses
is insufficient for aircraft,
to usegreatly
provide increased
the island increasing
taxiing gate
concourse use
capacity
flexibility.
and
concept. bypass Incapability
Dual addition,
taxi lanes the new taxilane
forbetween
aircraft in
the the configuration
terminal area,
concourses allows
provideallowingfor for
increasedmore flexibility
reduced
taxiing during
taxi-in
capacity and
irregular
taxi-out
and bypassevents
times andlikereduced
capability adverse weather
gate
for aircraft delays.
in the or terminal
ground holds.
The introduction of dualfor
area, allowing and flow-through
reduced taxi-in and
taxilanes
taxi-out times moreand thanreduced
doublesgate the delays.
airside area for aircraft, greatly
The introduction of dual increasing
and flow-throughgate use
Additionally,
flexibility.
taxilanes more each
In addition,
than new gate
the
doubles new will be
taxilane
the ableconfiguration
airside to
areaaccommodate allows
for aircraft, any for
greatlyaircraft
more up to ADG
flexibility
increasing gate III,
during
use
and
irregular someevents
flexibility. willaddition,
In accommodate
like adverse
the new ADG
weather IV, assuring
taxilane groundthat
orconfiguration there
holds. allowsis always
for more a gate available
flexibility during for
the aircraft
irregular types
events that
like are arriving
adverse weather at the terminal.
or ground holds.
Additionally, each new gate will be able to accommodate any aircraft up to ADG III,
In
and summary,
some willthe
Additionally, each main
newbenefits
accommodate gate willADGofbethis
IV, approach
assuring
able to gate
that
to accommodate there area
is
any improvements
always
aircraft a gate will be:
up toavailable
ADG III, for Figure 3.3: Masterplan, Increased Circulation Capacity of Taxilanes
•the An increase
and aircraft
some types
will ofthat
approximately
accommodate ADG 2
are arriving atmiles
IV, the in taxilane
terminal.
assuring length
that there available
is always for ground
a gate available for
maneuvering;
the aircraft types that are arriving at the terminal. 3.
•In summary,
Decongestion the main of maneuvering
benefits of this aircraft on and
approach to off
gate stand
areaby implementing
improvements dual
will be:or Figure 3.3: Masterplan, Increased Circulation Capacity of Taxilanes
loop
•In summary, taxilanes;
An increase of approximately
the main benefits of this 2 miles in taxilane
approach to gatelength
areaavailable
improvements for ground
will be: Figure 3.3: Masterplan, Increased Circulation Capacity of Taxilanes
•• Ability of every
maneuvering;
An increase gate to be able2to
of approximately accommodate
miles minimum
in taxilane length ADG IIIfor
available aircraft,
ground
• whereas
Decongestion
maneuvering; currently
of a number
maneuvering of gates
aircraft are
on restricted
and off to
stand regional
by jets
implementing only; dual or
•• Availability
loop taxilanes;
Decongestion of some dedicated aircraft
of maneuvering deicing positions
on and offthat standwillbyallow aircraft todual
implementing move oroff
• stand
Ability sooner
of every
loop taxilanes; making
gate to forbemore
ableefficient use of gates.
to accommodate minimum ADG III aircraft,
• whereas
Ability of currently
every gate a number
to be able of togates are restricted
accommodate to regional
minimum ADGjets only;
III aircraft,
By
• providing
whereas more
Availability areaaon
of some
currently the airside
dedicated
number to improve
ofdeicing
gates aircraft
positions
are thatto
restricted operational
will allow aircraft
regional areas,
jets the
to
only; move off
footprint
• stand area
sooner
Availability available
somefor
of making forboth
more
dedicated passenger
efficient processing
use of gates.
deicing positions thatfacilities
will allow andaircraft
supporting
to move off
roadway,
standtransportation
sooner makinginfrastructure
for more efficient and car
useparking
of gates. has naturally been modified
as
By well. The requirements
providing more area onfor thethis program
airside has not
to improve been reduced,
aircraft operational butareas,
a combined
the
solution
footprint of
By providing redistribution
area available
more area on ofthe
for some
both functions,
passenger
airside car parking
processing
to improve aircraft for example,
facilities
operational and greater
and supporting
areas, the
vertical
footprintdevelopment
roadway, transportation
area available is being
for proposed.
infrastructure
both passenger and processing
car parking facilities
has naturally been modified
and supporting
as well. The
roadway, requirementsinfrastructure
transportation for this program andhascar not beenhas
parking reduced,
naturally butbeen
a combined
modified
Further
solution details
as well. The of how each
of redistribution
requirements offorofthis
these
some projects
functions,
program function
car
has parking
not been andfor work
example,
reduced, together
but and as one
greater
a combined
airport
solutionwill
vertical follow.
development
of redistribution is being
of someproposed.
functions, car parking for example, and greater
1. vertical development is being proposed.
Further details of how each of these projects function and work together as one
airport will follow. 4.
Further details of how each of these projects function and work together as one Figure 3.4: Masterplan, Increased Gate Flexability
airport will follow.
1.
2.
conceptual view of central hall airtrain lga station from the grand central parkway
“The vision for a single, unified airport presented design and implementation challenges. By condensing the primary elements of the
conceptual view of the east airtrain lga station and landside connector from the grand central parkway
new Central Terminal B into three key components―a ‘big roof,’ a continuous brow and a continuous enclosure language―we were
able to establish parameters for a single language across all the varied aspects of the Grand Central Parkway frontage. This also
reinforced linking Terminal B to Central Hall, existing and new parking structures, AirTrain stations and the new Terminal C.
We worked extensively with the Port Authority, airport stakeholders and Governor Cuomo’s Airport Advisory Panel to ensure the
guidelines illustrated great design for the airport of tomorrow, consistency and achievable programs for all parties.”
C
PLAN
B A D
1. west elevation 3. trellis with hydroponics vegetation 5. plan view of curtain wall with trellis
2.
4.
3. 5.
view of penthouse lounge + terrace “The building sits within the historic context of 16th Street, which frames the vista to the White House. It combines
contextual massing with contemporary details and provides a complete surprise in the lobby.”
3. 5.
CONCEPT
1. massing sketch
1. 2. 4.
68 “We sought to connect and expand Buffalo Bayou Park into the project 69
SITE STRATEGY 3. building location studies 4. elevated park studies 5. landscape studies
and organize the mixed uses around the creation of activated outdoor
1. location map spaces on multiple levels. The project’s signature elements—the mixed-
2. site plan
use hotel and residential tower and the retail pavilion—engage the city
at the skyline and at the ground level to provide both a landmark and a
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
PRECEDENTS - STREETSCAPE + PARK
70 71
SITE PLAN 2. concept landscape 3. landscape activity diagram
ODES
A. retail pavilion
FARMER’S MARKET
OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE
DECEMBER 01, 2016
OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE
E
DECEMBER 01, 2016 DECEMBER 01, 2016 ALLEN PARKWAY MIXED USE _ HOUSTON, TX
3.
2. facade studies
HOTEL/CONDOOPTION
HOTEL/CONDO OPTIONCOMPARISON
COMPARISON
1.
74 75
1. view from allen parkway 2. view into park 4. view from condominium
2.
3. 4.
aerial view
COMMERCIAL
79
1. central plaza transformation 2. view from the water GHIRARDELLI
SQUARE
PLAZA
San Francisco, California, USA
HISTORY
G H
1. Woolen Mill Era: 1858-1889 2. Chocolate Factory Era: 1892–1962 3. Mixed-Use Development Era: 1962-1967
E
Pioneer Woolen Mills circa 1862-1899 at the Ghirardelli complex circa 1911. The Pioneer Ghirardelli Square 1965. The property was J beach street
original shoreline. Woolen Mills were originally built in 1862. designed for adaptive reuse and rebranded
Between 1893 and 1919, the D. Ghirardelli Ghirardelli Square by Lawrence Halprin and
company developed the site with several new architects Wurster, Bernardi and Emmons.
larkin street
hyde street
polk street
buildings.
F
I
The city-approved vision plan identified 14 ongoing projects focused on improving public access; day, night High-performance design elements include the introduction of stormwater treatment gardens to reduce runoff and improve water
82 83
1. site plan and year-round uses; transportation connections; regional plantings; and thoughtful choreography of historic 2. sustainability quality returning to the Bay. Reclaimed redwood timbers are used for sculptural seating, tables and other amenities that link the Square
and modern material and furnishing palettes. to the Bay Area. Low-voltage, high-efficiency LED fixtures replace the historic incandescent masts, maintaining their character while
A. upper plaza improving energy performance. Heat island reduction is achieved through new, high-reflectivity precast concrete pavers that decrease
B. fountain plaza The vision plan, master plan, design guidelines and implementation projects reconnect the Square to its the Square’s overall cooling and energy demands. Regionally native and adaptive vegetation replace the previous English garden
C. larkin street context, transportation lines and extraordinary views. New gateway design elements such as monolithic, plantings to reduce water demand and increase regional biodiversity.
D. west plaza reclaimed redwood timber seating, pedestal paving and regional plantings enable fresh uses and functions
E. larkin street + beach street stairs while complementing the historic factory material palette. Because sustainability and accessibility go hand-in-hand, the design introduces universally accessible routes and systems that ensure
access to these new amenities and sustainable features across the Square.
UNIVERSALLY LOW-VOLTAGE,
ACCESSIBLE LED HIGH
beach street ROUTES AND EFFICIENCY
SYSTEMS FIXTURES
REUSED,
RECLAIMED
REDWOOD
TIMBER
E BENCHES
STORMWATER
TREATMENT
GARDENS
larkin street
B
polk street
D
C
A
HEAT ISLAND
REDUCTION REGIONALLY
north point street NATIVE AND
THROUGH HIGH
REFLECTIVITY ADAPTIVE
HARDSCAPE VEGETATION
A. cast-in-place concrete
B. brick inlay
C. corrugated steel
D. i-beam
E. remnant foundation wall
F. i-beam pedestal
G. cast-in-place concrete 1
H. cast-in-place concrete 2
I. deteriorated waterproofing
J. garage structural slab
K. drainage pipe
L. 6” x 12” concrete modular pavers
M. 12” x 48” concrete modular pavers
N. paving pedestal
O. new waterproofing
P. concrete structural slab
Q. reuse existing drainage
R. additional drainage
A C
1.
“The revitalized Square serves multiple roles at multiple scales at the intersection of land, water, city and nature.”
hotel 35 floors
office 32 floors
B
CONCEPT
1. precedent
A
92 93
DESIGN 3. model photo - view from south
1.
SOUTHWEST FACADE
SOUTHWEST FACADE
EFFICIENCY EFFICIENCY
I.2. extrusion twist
II. stepping
III. self-shading
IV.
NORTHWEST FACADE
3. hotel: north and south hotel: east and west office: east and west office: north and south
19
NORTHEAST FACADE
FACADE DESIGN
PRINCIPLES The character of the building’s STUDY After settling upon a final massing strategy, FACADE
PRINCIPLESDESIGN The character of the building’s STUDY After settling upon a final massing strategy,
envelope is one of the most impactful aspects of the the same tools that informed the selection of this 4. envelope is one of the most impactful aspects of the the same tools that informed the selection of this
building aesthetic, perhaps only second to the building massing have also been used to examine the effects building aesthetic, perhaps only second to the building massing have also been used to examine the effects
form. However, it is also a critical component69 of the of the facade and shading systems for each building. form. However, it is also a critical component of the of the facade and shading systems for each building.
building design impacting
PRINCIPLES a wide range
The character of theofbuilding’s
building Going
STUDY forward,
After these tools
settling uponwilla also
finalbe used to
massing analyze
strategy, building design impacting
PRINCIPLES a wide range
The character of theof building
building’s Going forward,
STUDY these tools
After settling will
upon afi also be used to
nal massing analyze
strategy,
performance metrics,
envelope is one of theincluding: daylight
most impactful availability;
aspects of the and
the optimize subsequent
same tools studies
that informed the during theof
selection schematic
this performance
envelope metrics,
is one of the including: daylight
most impactful availability;
aspects of the and same
the optimize subsequent
tools studies
that informed during theofschematic
the selection this
96 97
1. view from west 2. aerial view of the development
1. 2.
drop-off + entry
COMMERCIAL
101
regional growth of chicago OUR
URBAN
MIDWEST
Chicago, Illinois, USA
CLIENT HOK
our practice, we must understand the context in which we work and live
Working within this context helps us identify and prioritize projects that
SHIFTING POPULATIONS
3
MINNEAPOLIS
CHICAGO INDIANAPOLIS COLUMBUS DETROIT MILWAUKEE CHICAGO INDIANAPOLIS COLUMBUS DETROIT MILWAUKEE 3,000,000
OMAHA CHICAGO
2,719,000 852,000 822,000 688,000 599,000 610,552MCLEVELAND 125,864M 117,824M 236,500M 97,307M CH
(≈19
2,896,000 792,000 715,000 945,000 597,000 476,446M 110,943M 96,482M 197,789M 86,779M Pote
WICHITA
COLUMBUS
CHICAGO
2010 (2,697,300)
INDIANAPOLIS
KANSAS CITY
ST LOUIS KANSAS CITY OMAHA MINNEAPOLIS CLEVELAND ST LOUIS
2,500,000
28 14 27 21
468,000 29
434,000 400,000 392,000 318,000
442,000 410,000 382,000 476,000 347,000
KANSAS CITY MINNEAPOLIS CLEVELAND ST LOUIS CINCINNATI KANSAS CITY MINNEAPOLIS CLEVELAND ST LOUIS CINCINNATI
468,000 400,000 392,000 318,000 299,000 121,638M 235,733M 124,609M 149,951M 121,407M 1950
442,000 382,000 476,000 347,000 296,000 107,411M 200,768M 109,190M 134,290M 104,120M
2,000,000
1950
Population 2013
1. Population 2000 (Decline / Growth)
SOUTH
MIDWEST
3
21.7%
NE 1,500,000
26 30 13 36
1950
WEST
1950
MILWAUKEE CHICAGO INDIANAPOLIS COLUMBUS DETROIT MILWAUKEE IND
1960 CO
599,000 610,552M 125,864M 117,824M 236,500M 97,307M DE
1,000,000
597,000 476,446M 110,943M 96,482M 197,789M 86,779M 1950 MI
19501950 1970
1950 KA
Midwest INDIANAPOLIS
Populatio 1970 CL
29% n Percent 1960 COLUMBUS MI
1960 21% DETROIT
OMAHA TOLEDO
ST
CIN
28 14 27 21 29
2015
1950 1950 1970
1960
MILWAUKEE DE
GDP Growth Rate Below National Average (Number is National Total GDP Ranking)
2. GDP Growth Rate Above National Average (Number is National Total GDP Ranking)
1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
106 107
INDUSTRY CONCENTRATION
Transportation
ties
CHICAGO
CHICAGO CHICAGO DETROIT DETROIT MINNEAPOLIS
MINNEAPOLIS NEW YORK NEW YORK
DETROIT
Mining, Logging Mining, Logging Mining, Logging Mining, Logging Mining, Logging Mining, Logging Mining, Logging Mining, Logging
MINNEAPOLIS and Construction and Construction and Construction and Construction and Construction and Construction and Construction and Construction
ST LOUIS 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Government Government Manufacturing Manufacturing Government Government MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURING Government Government MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURING Government Government Manufacturing Manufacturing
KANSAS CITY
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
ORMATION CINCINNATI
COLUMBUS 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
CLEVELAND Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation
Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0 Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0 Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0 Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0
& Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities
INDIANAPOLIS
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NEW YORK
LOS ANGELES
SAN FRANCISCO
Leisure and Leisure and Information Information Leisure and Leisure and Information Information Leisure and Leisure and Information Information Leisure and Leisure and INFORMATION INFORMATION
Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality
Education and Education and FINANCIAL FINANCIAL Education and Education and Financial Financial Education and Education and FINANCIAL FINANCIAL Education and Education and FINANCIAL FINANCIAL
Health Services Health Services Health Services Health Services Activities Activities Health Services Health Services Health Services Health Services
ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES
PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & Professional & Professional &
Business Service Business Service
BUSINESS SERVICES
BUSINESS SERVICES BUSINESS SERVICES
BUSINESS SERVICES BUSINESS SERVICES
BUSINESS SERVICES
Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Other Services Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation
Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0 Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0 Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0 Other Services
1.0 1.0
& Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities
LEISURE & LEISURE & Information Information Leisure and Leisure and Information Information LEISURE & LEISURE & Information Information LEISURE & LEISURE & INFORMATION INFORMATION
HOSPITALITY HOSPITALITY Hospitality Hospitality HOSPITALITY HOSPITALITY HOSPITALITY HOSPITALITY
Education and Education and Financial Financial Education and Education and FINANCIAL FINANCIAL Education and Education and FINANCIAL FINANCIAL Education and Education and Financial Financial
Health Services Health Services Activities Activities Health Services Health Services Health Services Health Services Health Services Health Services Activities Activities
ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES
Professional & Professional &
PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & Professional & Professional & Business Service Business Service
BUSINESS SERVICES
BUSINESS SERVICES BUSINESS SERVICES
BUSINESS SERVICES Business Service Business Service
Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation Trade, Transportation TRADE, TRANS TRADE, TRANS Trade, Transportation CHICAGO
Trade, Transportation CHICAGO
Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0 Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0 Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0 Other Services Other Services
1.0 1.0
& Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & Utilities & UTILITIES & UTILITIES & Utilities & Utilities DETROIT DETROIT
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MINNEAPOLIS MINNEAPOLIS
ST LOUIS ST LOUIS
KANSAS CITY KANSAS CITY
Leisure and Leisure and Information Information Leisure and Leisure and Information Information Leisure and Leisure and Information Information Leisure and Leisure and INFORMATION INFORMATION
CINCINNATI CINCINNATI
Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality Hospitality
COLUMBUS COLUMBUS
CLEVELAND CLEVELAND
INDIANAPOLIS INDIANAPOLIS
Education and Education and FINANCIAL FINANCIAL EDUCATION EDUCATION Financial Financial Education and Education and Financial Financial Education and Education and Financial Financial
NEW YORK NEW YORK
Health Services Health Services
ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH SERVICES Activities Activities Health Services Health Services Activities Activities Health Services Health Services Activities Activities
LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES
PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & Professional & Professional & PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & PROFESSIONAL & SAN FRANCISCO SAN FRANCISCO
Business Service Business Service
BUSINESS SERVICES
BUSINESS SERVICES BUSINESS SERVICES
BUSINESS SERVICES BUSINESS SERVICES
BUSINESS SERVICES
108
+89,600 San Francisco Bay Area
Ranked
In Chicago,
+25,500 Dallas/Ft.Worth
+24,700 Seattle
+2,300 Detroit
+2,100 Denver
BRAIN GAIN
20
0
20 6 Ja
06 nu
20 Feb ary
0 r
20 6 Mauary
0 r
20 6 Ap ch
0 r
20 6 Ma il
BRAIN DRAIN 0 y
20 6 Jun
20 06 Ju e
20 06 A ly
06 ug
20 Sep ust
0
20 6 Octemb
0 t e
20 6 No ober r
06 v
20 Decembe
07 em r
20 Ja be
07 nu r
20 Feb ary
0 r
20 7 Mauary
0 r
20 7 Ap ch
0 r
20 7 Ma il
0 y
20 7 Jun
20 07 Ju e
20 07 A ly
07 ug
20 Sep ust
0
20 7 Octemb
0 t e
20 7 No ober r
07 v
20 Decembe
0
20 8 Ja ember
08 nu r
20 Feb ary
0 r
20 8 Mauary
-700 Indianapolis 0 r
20 8 Ap ch
0 r
20 8 Ma il
0 y
20 8 Jun
20 08 Ju e
20 08 A ly
- 1,300 Chicago 08 ug
S
20 ep st u
0
20 8 Octemb
0 t e
20 8 No ober r
08 v
20 Decembe
0
20 9 Ja ember
- 1,600 Madison, Wisconsin 09 nu r
20 Feb ary
0 r
20 9 Mauary
0 r
20 9 Ap ch
0 r
number of jobs in major u.s. cities 2012-2016
20 9 Ma il
0 y
20 9 Jun
20 09 Ju e
20 09 A ly
09 ug
20 Sep st u
0
20 9 Octemb
0 t e
20 9 No ober r
09 v
20 Decembe
1
20 0 Janember
10 u r
20 Feb ary
10 ru
20 Mar ary
10 c
20 Apr h
10 il
20 Ma
10 y
- 4,400 Philadelphia 20 Jun
20 10 Ju e
20 10 Au ly
10 g
20 Sep ust
1
20 0 Octemb
- 5,100 Miami 1 t e
20 0 Nov ober r
10 e
20 Dec mbe
1 e r
20 1 Jan mbe
11 u r
20 Febr ary
11 ua
20 Mar ry
11 c
20 Apr h
11 il
20 May
11
20 Jun
20 11 Ju e
20 11 Au ly
11 g
20 Sept ust
1
20 1 Octemb
1 e
20 1 Nov ober r
11 e
20 Dec mbe
1 e r
20 2 Jan mbe
12 ua r
F
20 eb ry
12 ru
20 Mar ary
12 c
20 Apr h
1
20 2 Ma il
12 y
20 Jun
- 10,000 Pittsburgh 20 12 Ju e
20 12 Au ly
12 g
20 Sep ust
1
20 2 Octemb
1 t e
20 2 Nov ober r
12 em
- 11,200 Los Angeles 20 ec beD
1 e r
20 3 Jan mbe
13 u r
20 Feb ary
13 ru
20 Mar ary
13 ch
20 Apr
1
20 3 Ma il
13 y
20 Jun
20 13 Ju e
20 13 Au ly
13 g
20 Sep ust
1
20 3 Octemb
1 t e
20 3 Nov ober r
13 e
20 Dec mbe
1 r
20 4 Ja embe
14 nu r
20 Feb ary
14 r
20 Mauary
14 rc
20 Ap h
1 r
20 4 Ma il
14 y
20 Jun
20 14 Ju e
20 14 A ly
14 ug
20 Sep ust
1
20 4 Octemb
1 t e
20 4 No ober r
14 ve
20 Dec mbe
1 e r
20 5 Jan mbe
15 ua r
20 Jan ry
1
20 5 Feb uary
15 r
20 Feb uary
1 r
20 5 Mauary
15 r
20 March
15 ch
20 Ap
15 r
20 April
1 il
20 5 Ma
1 y
20 5 Ma
1 y
20 5 Jun
15 e
20 Jun
1 e
20 5 Jul
20 15 Ju y
1 l
20 5 Au y
20 15 August
1
20 5 Sep gust
15 t
- 17,200 Boston 20 Sep embe
1 t
20 5 Octember
1
20 5 Oc ober r
15 to
20 Nov ber
1
20 5 Novembe
1 r
20 5 Decembe
15 e r
20 Dec mbe
1 e r
20 6 Jan mbe
16 u r
20 Feb ary
16 ru
20 Mar ary
16 c
20 Apr h
16 il
20 Ma
16 y
20 Jun
LOS ANGELES
16 e
NEW YORK
CHICAGO
INDIANAPOLIS
SAN FRANCISCO
Jul
y
D.C.
0
Miami
Dallas
4000k
DETROIT 2000k
6000k
8000k
Boston
MINNEAPOLIS Seattle
Phoenix
10000k
Houston
CLEVELAND Columbus
Cincinnati
109
City
Philadelphia
110 111
CONNECTIVITY WITHOUT BORDERS 2. top airports for real estate investment 4. leverage our airports
1. regional highway + interstate network 3. high-speed railway possibilities 5. capitalize on our regional rail
160
AIR CARGO REAL ESTATE
SCORE SCORE
140
76.5
120
62.7
100
55.3
MSP
48.4 62.7
38.4
66.9
50.4
DTW
80
ORD
MDW
23.0
53.2 29.2
60
42.3 43.8
CLE
CVG
20
68.1 58.2 61.9 64.2 49.5 62.1 25.5 41.1 53.2 46.9 28.6 26.3
ORD MIA LAX MEM DFW SDF EWR IND ANC JFK OAK ATL
2.
0-5K
5K - 10K
10K - 50K
50K - 80K
80K - 100K
100K - 150K
150K - 200K
200K - 250K
250K - 300K
4. 300K - 415K
433K
741K
1,538K
2,393K
MADISON MILWAUKEE
GRAND RAPIDS
re-invest in our civic assets
CHICAGO
re-position our economy DES MOINES TOLEDO
CLEVELAND
OMAHA
re-inhabit our city FORT WAYNE
COLUMBUS
INDIANAPOLIS DAYTON
BLOOMINGTON
KANSAS CITY CINCINNATI
TOPEKA
ST LOUIS
LOUISVILLE
WICHITA
OKLAHOMA CITY
COMMERCIAL
115
tower view from sydney harbor TOWER
DESIGN
COMPETITION
Sydney, Australia
natural ventilation.
CLIENT Confidential
The project brief requested that all teams work with
artists on their proposals. HOK elected to collaborate
with James Carpenter Design Associates to integrate art
DESIGN PRINCIPAL Peter Ruggiero, AIA
within the architecture. The design designates plazas as
public event spaces rather than just places for sculpture.
DIAGRAM
3.
4.
1. 2.
122 123
FACADE 3. north elevation 4. east elevation 5. south elevation 6. west elevation
3. 4. 5. 6.
1. 2.
124 125
1. multilevel office space PLAN
3. roof terrace
A. open office
A
B. atrium space
C. roof terrace B
2.
3.
view north toward the sydney opera house
“The icons of Sydney—the Harbour Bridge and Opera House—are defined by their
3.
130 “We wanted to pay homage to traditional business practice while 131
INFORMATION 3. interconnecting stair
acknowledging the changes taking place in a modern workforce. A rich material
CLIENT Bentall Kennedy Group palette creates a formal base to support a newly agile work environment.
PLAN
1. level 11
2. level 12
A. reception C D
B. interconnecting stair
C. conference area B
D. upper floor café A
E. lunchroom
1. 2.
132 133
1. café 3. interconnecting stair + conference area
2. stair detail
1.
2. 3.
interconnecting stair + reception
CORPORATE
137
view through breezeway CORPORATE
AMENITIES BUILDING
FOR CONFIDENTIAL
CLIENT
Texas, USA
CLIENT Confidential and functionality while creating an inspiring visitor experience 2. level 0
CONCEPT
C
1. massing diagram
building entrance
campus core B
A
140 141
FACADE 2. brick texture studies
2.
SCHEME 5 SCHEME 6 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 7 SCHEME
SCHEME 6 9 SCHEME 8
SCHEMESCHEME
5 5 SCHEME 5 SCHEMESCHEME
6 6 SCHEME 6 SCHEMESCHEME
7 7
CONRAD I EXTERIOR MATERIALITY
SCHEME 9 SCHEME 9
SCHEMESCHEME
9 9 SCHEME 9
CONRAD I EXTERIOR MATERIALITY CONRAD I EXTERIOR MATERIALITY HO
CONRADCONRAD
I EXTERIOR
I EXTERIOR
MATERIALITYCONRAD I EXTERIOR MATERIALITY
MATERIALITY
3.
142 143
1. fitness center from north campus 2. dining room 4. fitness center
3. lobby
2.
3. 4.
dining deck
CORPORATE
147
1. conference room + adjoining breakout spaces 2. milk bar DAIRY
FARMERS
OF AMERICA
HEADQUARTERS
Kansas City, Kansas, USA
“The inspiration of the project was driven by the desire to celebrate the story of milk from farm to table. Clean, modern elements are
DESIGN PRINCIPAL Peter Sloan, AIA
juxtaposed alongside reclaimed materials to reflect and communicate DFA’s global reach while honoring the local dairy farmer.”
110,000 sq. ft. / 10,220 sq. m. - Peter Sloan, AIA, Design Principal
CONCEPT
A. B. C.
D. E. F.
150 151
1. exterior courtyard 2. movable wall system connecting work café to building courtyard
152 153
PLAN 2. level 1 4. ground floor concept diagram
A. building reception
B. central three-story stair
C. milk bar
D. serving area + kitchen
E. work café
F. multipurpose rooms
G. fitness center
H. outdoor courtyard
I. bocce ball court
D
J. outdoor meeting rooms
K. interview rooms C
L. open workspace
B F
A E
4.
H 2.
L
K
J
I
5.
3.
boardroom in open configuration, maximizing space flexibility to host events
156 157
1. second-floor living room overlooking main lobby 2. open, family-style meeting room is located at each floor’s stair landing 3. open workspace includes demountable private offices
4. open workspace
3.
4.
2.
central stair + adjoining work café
CORPORATE
161
double-height workspace DENTSU
AEGIS
NETWORK
OFFICE
Los Angeles, California, USA
CONCEPT
1. 2. 3.
166 167
1. main pantry 2. lounge looking toward pantry
CORPORATE
169
DALLAS OFFICE POLSINELLI
OFFICES
main lobby + hospitality lounge
Dallas, Texas, USA
Denver, Colorado, USA
Dallas Office
Denver Office
and rock. Visitors must break through the fog, mimicked in the
etched glass accent wall, to reach the open mountain vistas
CLIENT Polsinelli PC
beyond.
Dark and light woods echo the forest, with charcoal-stained oak
DESIGN PRINCIPAL Peter Sloan, AIA symbolizing the deeper tones of the forest floor. The use of color
reinforces the contrast between darkness and light, creating a
dynamic found in nature. Various shades of green, yellow and
Dallas: 63,000 sq. ft. / 5,850 sq. m. blue simulate the colors found in evergreens, aspen leaves and
Denver: 86,600 sq. ft. / 7,990 sq. m. the sky.
DALLAS PLAN
1. level 21
D
A. reception
B. central stair
C. hospitality lounge E
D. conference center
E. rooftop terrace
F. attorney workspace F
A B
conference rooms were pulled inboard to connect hospitality spaces
to an outside terrace + views of dallas’s skyline
174 175
1. central stair + reception lobby 2. work café 4. client hospitality area with views of downtown dallas
2.
1. 3.
DENVER OFFICE
3. level 22
“Our design approach builds on Polsinelli’s national brand to create spaces that are both uniquely modern and
A. reception desk
hospitality-centered to encourage social engagement with clients and communities.”
B. central stair
- Peter Sloan, AIA, Design Principal C. main lobby
D. feature wall
E. roof terrace
F. hospitality lounge
G. attorney workspace
D
C
3.
2.
180 181
1. lobby outside multipurpose rooms 2. central stair section 3. central stair
3.
182 183
1. client hospitality lounge 2. main reception 4. custom feature wall in collaboration with amy ellingson
3. boardroom
2. 4.
3.
CORPORATE
185
1. reception with connecting stair + coffee / wine bar 2. smoked metal + glass stair with leather wrapped panel wall WHITE &
CASE
OFFICE
New York, New York, USA
PLAN
1. level 50
B C
A
A. multipurpose rooms
B. reception below
C. knowledge center
I
D. fitness center
E. wellness center
F. lounge / wine bar
H
G. casual dining
E
H. servery F D
I. display kitchen G
conference breakout space + historic artifacts display
190 191
1. typical practice floor office pantry 2. typical practice floor open collaboration
192 “As a leading international law firm, White & Case wanted a first-class executive conference center that fosters social and 193
1. knowledge center looking into the reading room
professional networking. Building on that idea, we enhanced the visitor and staff experience by connecting the top two
2. south gathering lounge floors and creating a dramatic reception. We also developed a diverse amenity program. The space is a beautiful balance
of natural textures and polish, reflecting light throughout the day and night.”
1. 2.
194 195
1. lounge + wine bar doubles as small event space 2. casual dining with end grain wood flooring +
large oak pivot doors open to the lounge
CULTURAL
197
1. view from southeast at dusk 2. aerial view AL
FOZAN
3. inner courtyard + daily prayer hall
MOSQUE
Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia
3.
198 199
INFORMATION 3. site plan
CONCEPT
2. design inspiration
1.
2.
200 201
DRAWING 3. level 1
D. ablution
E. imam’s residence
F. office lobby
B G
C K
E
I
F D J
1. 3.
2. 4.
202 203
1. the patterned facade glows at night, creating a beacon in the landscape 2. an iconic landmark in a residential neighborhood 4. detail of the facade concept
“The nautilus form pays homage to the site’s adjacency to the sea. It is referential to 3. shafts of light penetrate the interior of the main worship hall,
creating ever-changing patterns throughout the day
forms found in nature, with a spiraling geometry that indicates a center point from
which all movement radiates out. The form also references the crescent moon of
2. 4.
3.
aerial view at night
CULTURAL
207
front entry approach looking south from 29th street NILE
VALLEY
AQUAPONICS
FACILITY
Kansas City, Missouri, USA
CONCEPT
2. sketch diagrams
1. 2.
210 211
1. community plaza 3. aerial view 4. community raised beds + approach
the harvest.”
4.
1.
2. 3. 5.
GOVERNMENT
“Viewed from the city, the stone facades block 213
1. view from the gulf 2. detail of southeast facade CENTRAL BANK OF
the intense desert sun and reflect the solidity and
KUWAIT
permanence of the Central Bank. In contrast, the HEADQUARTERS
transparent north elevation looks out across the Gulf, Kuwait City, Kuwait
1. northeast elevation
216 217
1. north elevation 2. southeast elevation 3. banking hall entrance
218 219
1. main entrance reception 2. reception waiting area 3. auditorium
2. 3.
HEALTHCARE
221
1. southeast view 2. historic university campus CENTER FOR
ACADEMIC MEDICINE
3. massing concept sketch
FOR CONFIDENTIAL
CLIENT
California, USA
2. 3.
222 223
INFORMATION 1. concept models
Pro
je
Sit ct
e
Arboretum
2.
1.
Oak Woodlands - Trees
224 225
LANDSCAPE FLORA auercus agrifolia - coast live oak
G (not shown)
I native grass + wildflowers
graxinus uhdei - orange county evergreen ash
H Pinus torreyana Cercis occidentalis quercus agrifolia - coast
Bloom in spring Aesculus californica
live oak
Torrey Pine Western Redbud muhlenbergia dubia - pine muhly California buckeye
Native Grasses w/ Wildflowers carex divulsa - berkeley sedge
salvia spathacea - hummingbird sage
urban garden
L M
K cercis occidentalis - western redbud
(not shown)
B lavandula - goodwin creek lavender
J N erigeron karvinskianus - santa barbara daisy
carex divulsa - berkeley sedge
calamintha nepeta - lesser calamint
lupinus albifrons - silver bush lupine
penstemon margarita bop - foothill penstemon
achillea filipendulina - yarrow
courtyard
2.
Like the Gates of Janus in ancient Rome, the center for academic medicine The entrance lobby creates a gateway in four directions: north-south and
acts as a gate with multiple functions: from past to future, from historical east-west. A south-facing balcony overlooks the main campus and frames
campus to new medical school campus, and from university grounds to the the grand entry porch. These elements will become aspirational icons and
arboretum. landmarks for the expanding medical school campus.
The courtyard allows the arboretum to flow through the buildings toward The building’s access and collaborative zones occur at the corners and ends
the medical school hospitals. The narrow architectural forms grant efficient of the wings. The main entrance lobby and principal collaborative spaces
access to daylight and natural ventilation, serving as a connection to nature. are stacked along the southwest corner closest to the historic campus.
Conceived as a large hall overlooking the campus, this space will function as
A pinwheel rotation introduced to the wings embraces the dynamic site a central collaborative destination for the medical faculty.
conditions. This provides directionality, hierarchy and opportunities for
diverse outdoor spaces. Small gaps and extensions to the wings produce
and project the pinwheel effect along the vertical organization. The implicit 3.
ground-level rotation is slightly different than the rotation at upper levels,
increasing the sense of movement.
228 229
SUSTAINABILITY 3. response to climate
2. passive ventilation
external
2. 4.
230 231
1. southwest view of courtyard 2. east view of courtyard looking toward arboretum
Built above a parking structure, the courtyard is accessed from under the great The courtyard, which can be accessed from both the west and south, is
hovering west volume—a porch-like space that will host a range of functions and surrounded by activity. Faculty, students and staff from the more public north
frame a generous opening to the courtyard and arboretum. The courtyard features wing will be drawn to the space and its restaurant, auditorium and gymnasium.
a large ovoid lawn bound by a meandering path to the arboretum. Flanked by The walkways overlook the courtyard and allow for outdoor access while bridges
trees and shrubs of local species, this path extends the arboretum plants into the traverse its edges. Completely open to the arboretum, the courtyard is a visual
courtyard. and experiential vestibule to nature.
232 233
1. view from west 2. facade from main road
An enveloping strategy allays the horizontal proportions, directionality and proportioned cutouts that expose an inner layer of glass. The west bar
implicit rotation of the building’s volumes. Long sequences of repetitive articulates an expanded version of the layered facades. An additional layer
vertical elements are carefully adapted to the facade’s specific condition. of aluminum blades provides shading. A longer overhang recalls the pattern
The subtle, rotating architecture hovers above ground—except at the of articulated rooftops on the existing campus.
northwest corner, where it is rooted in the earth in a wide, terra-cotta plinth.
The diaphanous facades along the courtyard are more detailed and take
The long, hovering limestone volumes open to the landscape as balconies advantage of the climate and outdoor amenities. On the south facade, a
and terraces. The stone volumes are expressed as planes with vertical landscaped walkway provides solar shading.
breakout space
Design Principal
HEALTHCARE
237
1. community hospital multi-bed tower 2. acute care hospital NG TENG FONG
GENERAL AND JURONG
COMMUNITY HOSPITALS
Jurong, Singapore
CONCEPT
1. 2.
integrated sustainable strategies
242 243
hospital greening strategy
H C
B
G
F D E A F. sky gardens
D. patient wards
G. therapeutic garden
A. vertical planting
hospital campus as part of a new greenway connecting two existing green corridors and weaving hospital in access to the
transportation networks.”
1.
CONCEPT
2.
252 253
1. dining room 2. rope wall 3. bar
1. 2.
churrascaria + dining + bar
“The interior character pays homage to the owner’s first restaurant experience in the Brazilian countryside and fuses rural
JACOB K. JAVITS
CONVENTION CENTER
DESIGN COMPETITION
New York, New York, USA
A. ballroom
B. meeting rooms
C. exposition hall
e
av
h
12t
BOH
GREEN ROOF
MARSHALLING
2.
EXISTING NEW
BOH
MARSHALLING
3.
INDICATIVE
INDICATIVE
DESIGN
DESIGN ALT.
ALT.1 1 ALT.
ALT.22
262 263
CONCEPT 3. shifted for program + views 4. massing elements 5. massing elements
2. original massing reinterpreted C. illuminated graphic display cube F. illuminated graphic display cube
1.
A B C D E F
2. 3. 4. 5.
S
S
S
SE VIEW- INCIDENT SOLAR RADIATION- WINTER (DEC - MAR)
INCIDENT
INCIDENT SOLAR ANALYSIS
INCIDENT SOLAR
INCIDENT SOLAR ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
INCIDENT SOLAR
SOLAR ANALYSIS
INCIDENT SOLAR
ANALYSIS
INCIDENT SOLAR ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
The Javits expansion structure has limited The Javits
The glazed
Javits areas on
expansion
expansion its facade
structure
structure has limited
has limited glazed
glazed areas
areas onon its
its facade
facade
The Javits expansion structure has limited glazed areas on its facade
The
The Javits
mainly dueexpansion
Javits expansion structure
structure
to the program has
has limited
The
limited
requirements
mainly glazed
Javits
glazed
ofduethe areas
expansion
areas
building.
to on
on
the program its
its facade
structure
The
program facade has limited
program limitedof
requirements glazed areas on
the building.
building. onTheits facade
facade
program
500 KWH/M2
mainly due to the program requirements The
mainlyJavits
due
of expansion
the to the
building. structure has
requirements
The program ofglazed
the areas its
The program
mainly
mainly
areas withdueglazed
due to the
to the facade
program
program requirements
include themainly
requirements main
areas
mainly of
ofduethe
the
entry
with
due tobuilding.
to theatrium
building.
and
glazedthe facade
programThe
program
The program
requirements
program
spaces
include the main
requirements mainof ofentry
the building.
the building.
and atrium
atrium The
The program
spaces
program
areas with glazed facade include the areas
main with
entryglazed
and facade
atrium include
spaces the entry and spaces
areas
facingwith
areas eastglazed
with glazed
and south,facade
facadetheinclude
include the
the
pre-function main
areas
main
facing
areas entry
with
entry
spaces
east
with at
andand
glazed
and
glazedboth atrium
facade
atrium
meeting
south,
facade thespaces
include
spaces rooms the main
pre-function
include the main entryatand
spaces
entry and
both atrium
meeting
atrium spaces
spacesrooms
facing east and south, the pre-function facing east and
spaces at bothsouth, the pre-function
meeting rooms spaces at both meeting rooms
a faceted surface that by virtue of its angles and self-shading reduce in-
facing east and
and south, the pre-function
pre-function spaces at both meeting rooms
from the meeting room and ballroom spaces. In addition smaller areas
glazing and facade design strategies that mitigate impact of direct and
impact of solar radiation must also allow for natural daylight and views
mainly due to the program requirements of the building. The program
facing east south, the facing east and
spaces and
at bothsouth, the
meeting pre-function
rooms spaces at both meeting rooms
radiation on the glazed surface. The south facing glazed areas employ
and ballroom levels facing south and the large west facing window
All of these areas combined still comprise of only about 30% of glazed
and ballroom levels facing south and thethe largeat west facing window
cident solar radiation on the facade. In addition to the design, the use
facing east and south, the pre-function spaces at both meeting rooms
through the glazed facade, our design ensures daylight availability for
facing east south, the pre-function spaces both meeting rooms
A major concern for solar radiation transmission was the west facing
in-direct solar radiation, we are able to reduce the actual solar trans-
The Javits expansion structure has limited glazed areas on its facade
and ballroom levels facing south and the large west facing window
the meeting room ballroom fromspaces.
the In addition
meeting room smaller
and areas
ballroom spaces. addition areas
areas with glazed facade include the main entry and atrium spaces
Its important to note that the facade design although must reduce
and ballroom levels facing south and large west facing window
window for the ballroom and meeting room areas. Our proposed
from the meeting room and ballroom spaces. In addition
design provides for a deep inset glazing with over 10 feet of over-
from
from the meeting
the
of vestibulemeeting room
facingroom and
northand ballroom
ballroom
adjacent tofrom
from spaces.
the
spaces.
ofthe green
vestibule
the Inroof
In addition
meeting
addition
facing
meeting room
decknorth
room smaller
and
smaller
are glazed.
adjacentareasto the
ballroom
areas spaces.
greenIn Inroof
addition
deck are smaller
are glazed.areas
of vestibule facing north adjacent to of vestibule
the green facing
roof deck areand
north ballroom
adjacent
glazed. to thespaces.
green addition
roof deck smaller
glazed.areas
of
Allvestibule
of vestibule facing
of these areas north
north adjacent
facingcombined adjacent to
toofthe
the
still comprise
All
of of green
vestibule
green
of
these
vestibule onlyroof
facing
roof
facing deck
deck
about
areas are
north glazed.
adjacent
areadjacent
30%
combined
north glazed.
of glazed
still to the
the green
comprise
to green
of roof
only
roof deck30%
about
deck are glazed.
are glazed.
of glazed
All of these areas combined still comprise All of these
of only areasaboutcombined
30% of stillglazedcomprise of only about 30% of glazed
All
All ofofthese
areaof these areasfacade
areas
the total combined
combined still
area.still comprise
All
comprise
Furthermore,
area
All ofof
of of
these
of only
only
using
the total about
areas
about 30%
combined
30%
high-performance
facade of still
of
area. glazed
still
glazedcomprise of
Furthermore, ofusing
only about
about 30%30% of
high-performance of glazed
glazed
area of the total facade area. Furthermore, area ofthese
the
using areas
total combined
facade area.
high-performance comprise
Furthermore, only
using high-performance
area
area of
of the
the total
total facade
facade area.
area.
glazing and facade design strategies Furthermore,
area
Furthermore,
that
glazing
area of
of using
the
using
mitigate
and
the total
totalhigh-performance
facade
high-performance
impact
facadefacade area.
of
design direct
area. Furthermore,
and
strategies
Furthermore,that using high-performance
mitigate
using high-performance
impact of direct and
glazing and facade design strategies glazing and facade
that mitigate impactdesign strategies
of direct and that mitigate impact of direct and
glazing and
glazing
in-direct and facade
facade
solar design
design
radiation, strategies
westrategies that
glazing
that
are ablein-direct
to
in-directmitigate
and
mitigate
reduce the
solar impact
facade
impact
actual
radiation, ofwe
design
of
solar direct
direct
trans- and to
strategies
and
are able
able that mitigate
reduce impactsolar
theVIEW-
actual of direct
direct
trans-and
in-direct solar radiation, we are ableglazing and facade design westrategies that mitigate impact of and
250
A
A major concern
major
window concern for solar
for
for the ballroomsolar and
radiation
radiation
meetingtransmission
A major
transmission
window concern
roomconcern wasballroom
was
areas.
for the Ourthesolar
for
the westradiation
solar
west
proposedfacing
radiation
facing
and meeting transmission
room areas. wasOur
areas. theproposed
west facing
facing
0
Its important that Natural
the facadeItsdesign
Its Daylight
although
important
important to note &
must
to note Views:
reduce
that
that
Its important to note that the facade design although must reduce
the facade
the facade design
design although
although must
must reduce
reduce
Its
Its important
important
impact toradiation
to
of solar note that
note thatmust
the facade
the facade Itsdesign
important
design
also impact
allow
impact for although
although
ofnatural
solar must
toradiation
note
must
daylight reduce
thatreduce
the facade
and
must facade
views design
also allow
allow although
for natural
natural must reduce
daylightreduce
and views
views
impact of solar radiation must also Its allowimportant
of
for to
solar
natural note
radiationthat
daylight the
must
and also
views design
for although must
daylight and
impact
impact of
of solar
solar radiation
for its occupants. radiation must
must also
While reducing allow
impact
alsothe
allow
forimpact
impact its for
ofnatural
for
of solar
natural
of solar
occupants.
solar daylight
radiation
daylight and
and views
must
transmission
While
radiation reducing
must alsothe
views
also allow for natural
impact
allow for natural
of solardaylight and views
transmission
daylight and views
for its occupants. While reducing the forimpact
its occupants. While reducing the impact of solar transmission
of solar transmission
for its
for its occupants.
through occupants.
the glazedWhile
While reducing
reducing
facade, the
the
our design
for impact
forimpact
its
ensures
through
its ofdaylight
of
the solar
occupants.
solar
glazed
occupants. transmission
While reducing
transmission
availability
facade,
While the impact
forthe
our design
reducing design ensures ofdaylight
solar transmission
transmission
availability for
for
through the glazed facade, our design throughensures the glazed
daylight facade, our
availability for impact
ensures of solar
daylight availability
through
the entirethe
through the glazed
glazed
depth facade,
facade,
of the our
our design
design
pre-function ensures
through
ensures
space
the
through as
entire the daylight
glazed
daylight
well
thedepthas
glazed availability
facade,
providing
of the
facade, our
availability
largefor
design
for space
pre-function
our design ensures
as
ensures daylight
well as availability
providing
daylight large
availability for
for
the entire depth of the pre-functionthe entire
space as depth
well asof the pre-function
providing large space as well as providing large
the entire
the
vistasentire depth
depth
to the of the
of the pre-function
city skyline pre-function
and the river. space
the
space
vistas
the entire as
entire
as
to well
depth
well
the as
as
city
depth providing
of the
providing
skyline and large
pre-function
large
the
of the pre-function space
river. as well as providing large
vistas to the city skyline and the river. vistas to the city skyline and the river.space as well as providing large
vistas
vistas toto the
the city
city skyline
skyline and
and the
the river.
vistas to
river.
vistas to the
the city
city skyline
skyline and
and the
the river.
river.
original Javits curtain wall design. The original Pei Cobb Freed convention center celebrated the latest in glass curtain wall
technology available in 1986―similar to London’s Crystal Palace of 1850. Our proposal adapts the current massing and
facades from the original 1986 structure―three decades later―while reimagining a glass building
using today’s glass technologies. This creates a new dynamic entry and integrates the expansion
2.
3.
aerial view
270 271
1. green roof + new marshalling garage 2. ballroom 4. view of circulation from meeting rooms
2. 4.
3.
view of new entrance from 11th ave
JUSTICE
275
1. main entry through the civic plaza 2. early concept model expressing facade articulation DAVIDSON COUNTY
CRIMINAL
3. massing study of building
JUSTICE
CENTER
Nashville, Tennessee, USA
3.
276 277
INFORMATION 2. southeast aerial
ELEVATION
A. plaza
B. entry lobby
C. visitation
D. work-release
E. lockers + gym
F. dayrooms
G. outdoor recreation yard
2.
F
G
C
C
A B
F
UP
E G
D
3.
282 283
DRAWING
1. west elevation
2. north-south section
1.
2.
284 285
1. west facade articulation from 3rd avenue 2. view into public rain gardens
civic plaza engages the community
“The success of the design for the Davidson Justice Center lies in the resolution of contemporary
attitudes of detention with the demands and expectations of significant civic urban buildings.”
DESIGN PRINCIPAL Matthew Hern allowing for openness between stations and promoting interaction among
researchers.
CONCEPT
2.
“The clean aesthetics and scale of the architectural structure foster interaction and
CLIENT Confidential
SECTION
A. entrance
B. parking
C. amenity
D. residential
A
300 301
CONCEPT 2. southwest view of elevated amenity space
“The design investigates a new paradigm for urban housing and a redefined utility of the urban elevated garage
1. typical residential floor on levels 8-24 E. main entrance I. coworking space N. 4-bedroom unit
F. bike room J. bar O. 2-bedroom unit
G. parking garage entrance K. outdoor lounge P. 3-bedroom unit
A. 4-bedroom unit
H. lobby L. flex + event space Q. water feature
B. 2-bedroom unit
M. parking R. terrace
C. 3-bedroom unit
D. studio unit
A R
G
J
N
D Q
L
E H I M O
B F K
N
P
2. 3. 4.
C
RESIDENTIAL
DESIGN
COMPETITION
New York, New York, USA
CONCEPT
“The new development visually anchors the neighborhood with an elegant tower
A. entry hall of full floor unit F. entry hall of full floor unit
B. master suite G. eat-in kitchen
C. living room H. dining room
D. dining room I. living room
E. eat-in kitchen J. master suite
B H I
A F
J
E
2. 3.
1. 4.
312 313
1. west elevation 2. street view 3. view from east river looking north
1. 2.
view from east river looking south
SCIENCE +
TECHNOLOGY
317
1. gateway to the campus EDUCATION
BUILDING
2. building geometry as a response to site
FOR CONFIDENTIAL
CLIENT
California, USA
2.
1.
318 “The design team set out to demonstrate our process and ability to harness cross- 319
INFORMATION PLAN
disciplinary thinking. Our process adapted the university’s research philosophy
CLIENT Confidential of thinking, observing, making and testing. The proposal embodies dualities of 2. level 3 + level 4
CONCEPT
A C
D
H
G
F
E
320 321
SITE STRATEGY 2. building concepts 3. gateway + heart 4. pathways
1. site concepts
1. 2. 3. 4.
322 323
MODEL 2. view across canyon 5. a new campus heart
2.
3.
1.
4.
324 325
1. interior activity hub 2. typical studio work space
2.
3.
SCIENCE +
TECHNOLOGY
327
1. view of main entrance from midland road 2. main east-west atrium THE
FRANCIS
CRICK
INSTITUTE
London, UK
DESIGN PRINCIPAL Larry Malcic, AIA The significant technical challenges of building on this
DESIGN TEAM LEADER David King, RIBA urban site required design measures that prevented
vibration and electromagnetic interference from local rail,
SCIENCE LEADER Bill Odell, AIA subway and truck traffic.
CONCEPT
1. design evolution
330
SITE
context map
I
A. the francis crick institute
B. british library
C. st pancras station
D. eurostar station
E. king’s cross station D
F. euston station
G. ucl campus
H. future turing institute
I. king’s cross development
G
F
332 333
CONCEPT 2. study model in site context
1. massing strategy
A. B.
C.
D. E.
aerial view of the crick
©Laing O’Rourke
336 337
PLAN 2. level 1
X
I K O Y
P T
P
T
Q Q
C
B
W
N M
V
view from lab write-ups toward central collaboration space
340 341
SECTION 2. glazing to transverse atrium 3. ground floor central collaboration space
1. longitudinal section through atrium 4. cross-atrium bridges provide opportunities for informal meetings
A. labs
B. mechanical
C. atrium
D. entrance
E. auditorium
F. loading bay
C C 3.
E F D
D
B
A
B
A
2. 4.
342 343
ATRIUM 2. main reception + auditorium entrance 4. elevator bank + call station
1. open stair connecting the central collaboration space at each level 3. central stair from above
2.
3. 4.
344 345
LABORATORY 2. perimeter circulation route with offices + write-ups 3. openable white walls create collaboration pods that encourage
spontaneous discussions + interaction
4. view from a write-up area with primary lab, shared support + mirrored
layout beyond
3.
2. 4.
ground floor view of auditorium + atrium
“Science is constantly evolving and therefore requires a highly collaborative environment to facilitate scientific
breakthroughs. We are delighted that our holistic design solutions will aid in these new discoveries and keep London at
3.
350 “Engaging the building plan and section into a synchronous design of simple 351
INFORMATION PLAN
folding planes of glass and vibrant colors, we reimagined how a 1960s
CLIENT Confidential 3. level 0
office building made up of opaque, cast concrete and stone panels could be
CONCEPT
E
2. health + wellness diagrams
B B
E
D
H
I G
A
wet
support
E C
wet
circulation
2.
352 353
1. phenotype models 3. lab
2. faculty phenotypes
1.
The team incorporated three of the school’s five faculty phenotype models into the research building. Investigating a wide variety of planning
scenarios enabled the team to create the optimal quantity and mix of wet and dry benches and desks.
2.
2. 3.
360 361
INFORMATION 2. early conceptual building section
CONCEPT
1. concept sketches
362 363
PLAN 2. diagram illustrating internal atria connectivity 3. level 0 4. level 1 5. level 2
mechanical
vivarium
shell
E
H
shell
office
D F
4.
labs
B
mcom*
C L
mcom*
K
2.
mcom*
A B J
I
public space 3. 5.
364 365
1. main lobby 2. cafeteria 4. west atrium
3. library
2.
3. 4.
366 367
1. view from channelside 2. main lobby + plaza
“The design provides the university with a setting for a new way of
2.
370 371
INFORMATION 2. site plan
CONCEPT
1. concept diagram A
B
B
B
G
372 373
1. aerial perspective looking east 2. seating views looking downtown
3. street-level approach
2.
3.
field level view of home team stands
“This project hearkened back to the original sports venues and how they were sited by using the natural topography and folding
the stadium’s natural bowl shape into an existing landscape. Unlike the ancients, however, who found hills and natural forms to
work with, our team discovered that repurposing the site of a highway interchange created the opportunity for a natural bowl.
By fitting the stadium into the local context and removing acres of barriers in the old highway network, we were able to connect
the fabric of the city with this new development. The final move is a gentle tilt to the east, shading the bowl and honoring views
1.2 million sq. ft. / 111,480 sq. m. Renovations for 2017 included comprehensive
updates to all existing premium spaces on the
200 Club and 200 Mezzanine Suite levels and
annual EUI: 28.5 kBtu/sf/yr distinct new designs for the sideline and end zone
45% below ASHRAE 2007 suites. Club interiors, designed in collaboration
with Rockwell Group, were refreshed to support
the Dolphins’ approach to the fan experience.
PLAN
A. support column
B. mast
C. circulation ramps A
D. open concourse
E. escalators
E
380 381
1. north club 2. public art in concourse 4. north club food + beverage
2.
3. 4.
382 383
1. structural drawing of mast 2. mast
A
A. upper node
B. tension support cable
C. the mast
D. etfe membrane
E. roof steel
F. lower node
G. tension bracing
H. concrete support column
I. upper concourse
F
I
SECTION
“The original stadium lacked identity and an architectural presence. We addressed this by
creating an expansive and iconic shade structure. This elegant open-air canopy, which was
erected in just seven months, includes more than 17,000 tons of steel and covers more than
AVIATION + TRANSPORTATION LaGuardia Airport Central Terminal B New York, New York, USA 12 Eunil Kim Juyoung Park
Peter Ruggiero (Design Principal) Gerard DeZern Joo Young Kim Jack Parker
Marie Achalabun Kholisile Dhliwayo Varun Kohli Amy Patel
Amir Aghajani Saad Dimachkieh Komal Kotwal Nishiel Patel
Roosevelt Alexandre Gregory DiRienzo Aman Krishan George Pavlovski
Zahra Ali Koriey Dixon Gary Kuzma Jennifer Pittenger
Marcus Allen George Dolidze OChong Kwon Mark Pritchard
Abdulaziz Almobarak Julie Donovan Joanna Lam Courtney Robinson
Robert Asselin Madeleine French Lamar Lane Alejandro Rodriguez
Paul Auguste Carl Galioto Julian Lawson Rene Ruiz
Cindy Bang Yu Gao Edward Ledoux Roberto Saldarriaga
Tom Bayer Cid Garcia Kanoknart (Noon) Leelardchareon Adriana Sangeorzan
Stephen Beacham Hyeongmo Goo Zifan Liu John Santoro
Matthew Breidenthal Apoorv Goyal Christopher Lodge Meiko Sato
Jose Briones Raul Guerrero Eugene Lund Gregory Schleusner
Ashlee Broadus Pawel Gurdak Shawn Lutz Darko Sefic
John Brocato Meredith Hall Al Lyons Jeannette Segal
Bart Butler Nancy Hamilton H. (Anu) Mahendra Mohammed Shuaib
Yuhong Cao Lawson Hanna Donald Marmen Simon Shim
Jeremy Charmchizadeh Mark Hendel Marissa Martorana Satomi Shimamura
Dany Chehade Brian Henkel Glenn McCann Francisco Silva
Robert Chicas Adriana Hernandez Charles McGrail Michael Smith
Ilya Chistiakov Julia Heutel Katherine McPhillips Julie Somarriba
James Christerson Eli Hoisington Francesca Meola Erica Srolovitz
Mario Claussnitzer Alyssa Horn Michael Miller Jacquelyn Suozzi
Leesa Coller Kyle Ingber Oritsegbegbemi Nanna Amer Taghlebi
Peter Costanzo Julie Janeo Alexander Nash Jiasi Tan
Ashley Craig Nathan Janicek Sergio Navarro Giacomo Tinari
Steven Danielpour Justin Jennings John Neary Enrico Tomassoli
Benjamin Denker Naomi Katlowitz Edgar Nunnelly Diana Ton
Devki Desai Hiroyuki Kawakami Anastasios Papadopoulos Abbeylane Torres
DESIGN TEAMS (CONT.)
AVIATION + TRANSPORTATION LaGuardia Airport Central Terminal B (cont.) The Allen Mixed-Use Development Houston, Texas, USA 64
(CONT.) John Tran Zhenhuan Xu Roger Soto (Design Principal) Raul Guerrero
Aaron Ricardo Vazquez Junko Yamakawa Kathrin Brunner Jenny Qualls
Hengfeng Wang Scott Yocom Zach Christeson Joseph Wilfong
Stephen Weinryb Deborah Young Jarrett Ewing
Elizabeth Weintraub Vincent Yu
Marion White Bashir Zivari Ghirardelli Square Plaza San Francisco, California, USA 78
Elizabeth Wu Christopher Zoog Brian Jencek (Design Principal) Xue Ling
Minyoung Choi Arthur Morrissey
New LaGuardia Airport Master Plan New York, New York, USA 38 Kathy Doi Beau Pesa
Gregory Cranford (Design Principal) James Mallory Joon Kim Robin Roderick
Matt Breidenthal Francesca Meola Ben Kuchinsky Joseph Schneider
Javier Buscaglia-Pesquera Daniel Ng
Kenneth Drucker Aneirin Owens Mixed-Use Development Design Competition Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 88
Anne Fletcher Isaac Plumb Roger Soto (Design Principal) Chris Oliver
Ely Fretz Casey Renner Kathrin Brunner Seonghyeak Won
Carl Galioto Maria Salazar
Lucy Gross Simon Shim Our Urban Midwest Chicago, Illinois, USA 100
Marc Gross Jiasi Tan Domenic Salpietra (Design Principal) Jiasi Tan
William Jenkinson Patrick Vokaty Baixin Ren
Kooho Jung Justin Warner
Nicolas Libeyre Zhaoyan Zheng Tower Design Competition Sydney, Australia 114
Peter Ruggiero (Design Principal) Farid Pour
COMMERCIAL 1101 16th Street NW Washington, DC, USA 54 Matt Breidenthal Sean Quinn
Bill Hellmuth (Design Principal) Emillio Stokes Allison Burrell Casey Renner
Mateusz Gawad Esther Wang Mark Hendel Domenic Salpietra
Chloe Hiyu Joe Winters Kyle Ingber Jiasi Tan
Amit Khanna Giacomo Tinari
CORPORATE (CONT.) Corporate Amenities Building for Confidential Client Texas, USA 136 White & Case Office New York, New York, USA 184
Roger Soto (Design Principal) Noon Leelardcharoen Tom Polucci (Design Principal) Rene Ruiz
Cindy Bang Wendy Niziol Gregory Bassiely Andrea Tambay
Kathrin Brunner Joseph Wilfong Elizabeth Marr Christine Vandover
Yelena Mokritsky
Dairy Farmers of America Headquarters Kansas City, Kansas, USA 146
Peter Sloan (Design Principal) Mark O’Hara CULTURAL Al Fozan Mosque Dhahran, Saudi Arabia 196
Jake Baker Zachary O’Keefe Roger Schwabacher (Design Principal) Mateusz Gawad
Lynn Carlton Sandy Price Olivia Calalo Leon Ge
Adam Guzman Molly Smith Andrea Feniak Oliver Vranesh
Eric Linebarger Tracy Stewart
JJ Nicolas Bridget Sturr Nile Valley Aquaponics Facility Kansas City, Missouri, USA 206
Chris DeVolder (Design Principal) Tony McGrail
Dentsu Aegis Network Office Los Angeles, California, USA 160 Jake Baker JJ Nicolas
Kristi Zoref (Design Principal) Erika Reuter
Kallie Ingersoll Meiko Sato GOVERNMENT Central Bank of Kuwait Headquarters Kuwait City, Kuwait 212
Justin Ping Anthony Spagnolo Larry Malcic (Design Principal) Simon Lawrence
Christopher Colosimo Tom Leung
Polsinelli Office Dallas, Texas, USA 168 Chris Fannin Mark O’Brien
Peter Sloan (Design Principal) David Roberts Ian Fleetwood Andy Warner Lacey
Eric Linebarger Shawn Sanem Daniel Hajjar
Emily Payne Tracy Stewart
Steven Roark HEALTHCARE Center for Academic Medicine for Confidential Client California, USA 220
Polsinelli Office Denver, Colorado, USA Paul Woolford (Design Principal) So Young Lee
Peter Sloan (Design Principal) Shannon Moore Julia Cooper Ali Nasiri
Erin Adcock Emily Payne Tom Fortier Ryan Nearman
Ashley Carter Steven Roark Emily Fowlkes Chris Patneau
Claire Dooley Danny Shervington Daniel Herriott Kyle Prenzlow
Aaron Godfrey Tracy Stewart Michele Hutchinson Philip Ra
Eric Linebarger Brian Jencek Ali Sedaqat
Tom Kaczkowski Rotimi Seriki
Randy Kray David Vogel
Ben Kuchinsky LiYan Yang
Minji Lee
DESIGN TEAMS (CONT.)
HEALTHCARE (CONT.) Ng Teng Fong General and Jurong Community Hospitals Jurong, Singapore 236 PRODUCT DESIGN Scientific Lab Furniture System 288
Henry Chao (Design Principal) Shiva Mendez Matthew Hern (Design Principal) Ami Shah
Mara Baum William Roger Virginia Byers Gordon Stratford
Michael Gould Paul Woolford Susan Grossinger
Brian Jencek
RESIDENTIAL 633 S. LaSalle Street Tower Chicago, Illinois, USA 296
HOSPITALITY Fogo de Chao Brazilian Steakhouse San Francisco, California, USA 248 Peter Ruggiero (Design Principal) Gaute Grindheim
Daniel Herriott (Design Principal) Anne Pradenas Allison Burrell Lou Oswald
Dimitri Avdienko Tambra Thorson Javier Buscaglia-Pesquera Domenic Salpietra
Casey Hagen Ashley Craig Dan Sullivan
Jacob K. Javits Convention Center Design Competition New York, New York, USA 256 Sutton Place Design Competition New York, New York, USA 304
Kenneth Drucker (Design Principal) Nathan Hoofnagle Kenneth Drucker (Design Principal) John MacCallum
Claudia Conde Varun Kohli Anne Fletcher James Mallory
Shayna Cooper Marina Mazin Kooho Jung Elizabeth Weintraub
Carl Galioto Marie-Paule Petitjean
Apoorv Goyal Maria Salazar SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY Education Building for Confidential Client California, USA 316
Greg Green Harsha Sharma Ernest Cirangle (Design Principal) Brian Jencek
Marc Gross Ashley Craig Randy Kray
Robert Cull Ken Sumner
JUSTICE Davidson County Criminal Justice Center Nashville, Tennessee, USA 274 Jessica Ginther LiYan Yang
Peter Ruggiero (Design Principal) Sue Kim
Julie (Hyun Jung) Cho Nareg Kurtjian
Gregory Cook Jourdon Miller
Jeff Davis Cory Murner
Fred Goebel Lou Oswald
Jeff Goodale George Pavlovski
Gerry Guerrero Casey Renner
Dan Hartmann Bob Schwartz
Larry Hlavacek Patrick Vokaty
Yongbeom Ji
DESIGN TEAMS (CONT.)
SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY The Francis Crick Institute London, UK 326 University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine Tampa, Florida, USA 358
(CONT.) Larry Malcic (Design Principal) Gethin Hemmings Roger Soto (Design Principal) Christopher Patterson
David King (Design Team Leader) Angus Kennedy Melissa Collazo Adriana Rojas
Bill Odell (S+T Leader) Yuan Liang Amelia Cubbage April Sun
Mujib Ahsan Tom Leung Jamie Inskeep Tom Thomas
Adrienne Bohan Liam Mannion Eddie Pabon Jonathan West
Joyce Chan Amy McGarry
Andrew Childs Beate Mellwig SPORTS + RECREATION + Major League Soccer Stadium St. Louis, Missouri, USA 368
Claire Cohen Mark O’Brien ENTERTAINMENT Eli Hoisington (Design Principal) Arno Sandoval
Christopher Colosimo Femi Oresanya Chris DeVolder Andrew Zell
Francesco Cortese Nilesh Patel
David Cutmore Adam Rigby Miami Dolphins Hard Rock Stadium Miami, Florida, USA 376
Mark Drew Shem Sacewicz George Heinlein (Design Principal) Chris King
Paul Duggleby Judith Sayers Scott Bond Halie McCarter
James Eggleton Jeff Strohmeyer Tyler Clark Kent McLaughlin
Jeongsu Eun Robert Studd Jeremy Crabb Erica Muhlenbruch
Ian Fleetwood Sarah Scarisbrick Jeff Davis Joe Nehama
Queralt Goni Jamie Taylor Micheal Day Mark O’Hara
Robert Gordon Alejandra Anguil Vanier Ewa Glebocka Zachary O’Keefe
Mark Kennedy Andy Warner Lacey Jeff Goode Michael Patterson
Hannah Grammon Emily Scaduto
Greg Green Jeff Sittner
Medical Research Building for Confidential Client California, USA
348 Sarah Hunter Lynn Shenk
Paul Woolford (Design Principal) Ben Kuchinsky
Ed Hurtig Danny Shervington
Tom Fortier Joseph Lewis
Erik Jertson Tracy Stearns
Emily Fowlkes Ryan Nearman
John Jesik Megan Weber
Daniel Herriott Kyle Prenzlow
Dean Jordon Kyle Wedel
Michele Hutchinson Susan Seastone
Kloe Katubig
Brian Jencek Rotimi Seriki
Randy Kray
IMAGE CREDITS
AVIATION + TRANSPORTATION LaGuardia Airport Central Terminal B Mir, HOK 12 HEALTHCARE Center for Academic Medicine for Confidential Client Foreground Visuals 220
New LaGuardia Airport Master Plan Arqui300, HOK 38 Ng Teng Fong General and Jurong Community Hospitals Rory Daniel 236
COMMERCIAL 1101 16th Street NW Neoscape, HOK 54 HOSPITALITY Fogo de Chao Brazilian Steakhouse Emily Hagopian 248
The Allen Mixed-Use Development ATCHAIN 64 Javits Convention Center Design Competition Shanghai Icon Digital Technology 256
Ghirardelli Square Plaza Jamestown, Marion Brenner 78
Mixed-Use Development Design Competition +imgs 88 JUSTICE Davidson County Criminal Justice Center ATCHAIN 274
Our Urban Midwest HOK 100
Tower Design Competition Doug and Wolf 114 PRODUCT DESIGN Scientific Lab Furniture System Kewaunee 288
CORPORATE Bentall Kennedy Office Tom Arban 128 RESIDENTIAL 633 S. LaSalle Street Tower HOK 296
Corporate Amenities Building for Confidential Client A-TRACE Digital Technology 136 Sutton Place Design Competition HOK 304
Dairy Farmers of America Headquarters Michael Robinson 146
Dentsu Aegis Network Office Benny Chan©Fotoworks 160 SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY Education Building for Confidential Client Steve Parker 316
Polsinelli Offices Michael Robinson 168 The Francis Crick Institute Chris Ansell, Paul Grundy 326
White & Case Office Eric Laignel 184 Medical Research Building for Confidential Client Bruce Damonte 348
University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine ATCHAIN 358
CULTURAL Al Fozan Mosque HOK 196
Nile Valley Aquaponics Facility HOK 206 SPORTS + RECREATION + Major League Soccer Stadium Pictury 368
ENTERTAINMENT Miami Dolphins Hard Rock Stadium Christy Radecic 376
GOVERNMENT Central Bank of Kuwait Headquarters Nick Merrick©Hedrich Blessing 212