MATRIX FOR CHAPTER 5

Below is a sample of matrix in preparation to chapter 5

- You can use other terms to make your manuscript appealing but it should be simple

and direct to the point

- This is guide to make your judgments in proper sequence and organized

 Problem/objectives Findings Conclusion Recommendations
(You answer the question “so what?)
1. To Design a …. The device was successfully planned according to The device may not be applicable to those who
the established parameters The design of the device met all the established want a permanent drawing table.
parameters.
2. To Fabricate … The device was successfully built based from the The tabletop is not stable. It is recommended to
plan and suggestions of panel of experts were The fabrication/construction of the device is use light-weight materials.
considered acceptable.
3. To Evaluate in terms of: The device had a rating of 4.60 and interpreted as It is concluded that the device having a rating of The tabletop is built for its functionality wherein
a. Functionality Highly Acceptable. 4.60 in the functionality parameter indicates that the angle can be adjusted. It is recommended to
it effectively meets user needs and expectations. put lock for safety.
b. Stability The device had a rating of 4.48 and interpreted as With a result of 4.48 in the rating concluded that The device took a lot of time when adjusting the
Very Acceptable. the device’s stability is sufficient to keep the height. It is recommended to use automatic lock or
device sturdy and balanced. easy-to-use locks for time saving.
c. Durability The device had a rating of 4.50 and interpreted as Having a result of High Acceptable in the The device's functionality has been rated highly by
Highly Acceptable. durability parameter, the device could withstand both students and evaluators. However, a minor
wear and tear during long-term use. issue has been noted regarding the table's stability,
as it tends to shake slightly during use.
d. Portability The device had a rating of 4.27 and interpreted as It is concluded that with the result of Very The device is collapsible and space-saving but it is
Very Acceptable. Acceptable in the portability parameter, the difficult to move and transfer due to the materials
device is convenient, collapsible and space- used.
saving.
4. Over-all Performance The device had a rating of 4.46 and interpreted as With the result of Very Acceptable, the device Future researchers are encouraged to evaluate and
Very Acceptable. performs the features that is mentioned and study further the other performance aspects of the
expected. Multifunctional Drawing Table that is not covered
by the study.

* Do not include over-all performance if it is not asked/included in your objectives (chapter 1}.