RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)

For Master Teacher - ANNOTATIONS

KRA 1: CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY

OBJECTIVE 1: Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum
teaching areas (PPST 1.1.3)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 in COT – Outstanding
For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I
applied high level knowledge of content and pedagogy within and across curriculum teaching areas to
empower learners to acquire and apply successful learning strategies to assist in the development of
learners. It is evident that I have met the objective, as shown by a rating of 8 under Indicator 1 –
Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas.
This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 7 in COT – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. When
delivering the lesson, I motivated learners to investigate the content area to expand their knowledge and
satisfy their natural curiosity. It is evident that I have met the objective, as shown by a rating of 7 under
Indicator 1 – Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum
teaching areas. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 in COT – Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. When
delivering the lesson, I address content accurately and its focus is congruent with the big ideas and/or
structure of the discipline. It is evident that I have met the objective, as shown by a rating of 6 under
Indicator 1 – Modeled effective applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum
teaching areas. This is equivalent to 3 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 in COT – Unsatisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. When
delivering the lesson, I address content accurately and make connections across disciplines. It is evident
that I have met the objective, as shown by a rating of 5 under Indicator 1 – Modeled effective
applications of content knowledge within and across curriculum teaching areas. This is equivalent
to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

OBJECTIVE 2: Evaluated with colleagues the effectiveness of teaching strategies that promote learner
achievement in literacy and numeracy skills (PPST 1.4.3)
MOVs:
1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC sessions/FGDs/meetings/other collegial discussions
2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/FGDs/other collegial discussion

ASHLEY GUINOO
3. Reflection Notes of teachers on coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/other collegial
discussions that highlights the objective with practice proof of attendance
4. Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form (PMCF)

ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 in COT - Outstanding
For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached Performance Monitoring Coaching Form (PMCF)
which showed how I guided my colleagues in the planning for the evaluation of the effectiveness of
teaching strategies that promote learner achievement in literacy and numeracy across all quarters. Since
I was able to meet the objective, a rating of 8 under Indicator 2 – Evaluated with colleagues the
effectiveness of teaching strategies that promote learner achievement in literacy and numeracy
skills, which is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale where given.

Rating of 7 in COT – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached reflection notes of teachers on the coaching and
mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions that highlights how I
synthesized discussions on the evaluation of effectiveness of teaching strategies that promote learner in
literacy and numeracy across 3 quarters. A rating of 7 under Indicator 2 – Evaluated with colleagues
the effectiveness of teaching strategies that promote learner achievement in literacy and numeracy
skill, which is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale where given.

Rating of 6 in COT – Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached minutes/notes of coaching and mentoring
sessions/meetings/FGDs/other collegial discussion that highlights how I evaluated with my colleagues
the effectiveness of teaching strategies that promote learner in literacy and numeracy across 2 quarters.
A rating of 6 under Indicator 2 – Evaluated with colleagues the effectiveness of teaching strategies
that promote learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skill, which is equivalent to 3 points
(Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale where given.

Rating of 5 in COT – Unsatisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached proof/s of attendance in coaching and mentoring
sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussion that highlights how I evaluated
effectiveness of teaching strategies that promote learner in literacy and numeracy in 1 quarter only. A
rating of 5 under Indicator 2 – Evaluated with colleagues the effectiveness of teaching strategies that
promote learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skill, which is equivalent to 2 points (Very
Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale where given.

OBJECTIVE 3: Developed and applied effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative
thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills (PPST 1.5.3)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. When
delivering the lesson, a learning environment for higher order thinking skills that enables learners to
evaluate their thinking and to seek constructive feedback were evident. I clearly fulfilled the goal, as
evidenced by a rating of 8 under Indicator 3 – Developed and applied effective teaching strategies to
promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills. This is
equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
ASHLEY GUINOO
Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory
For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. Using
a well-directed questions and activities, I challenged learners to justify their thinking and successfully
engaged most of them during the teaching and learning process. It is evidenced by a rating of 7 under
Indicator 3 – Developed and applied effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative
thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills which is equivalent to 4 points (Very
Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Satisfactory
For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I
employed range of teaching strategies to ensure that most learners are given opportunities to give their
opinions/ideas about the lesson and to react to the opinions of their classmates. A rating of 6 under
Indicator 3 – Developed and applied effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative
thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills which is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in
the RPMS Rating Scale were given.

Rating of 5 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. In
delivering the lesson, I personally ask questions and provided activities that mostly require learners to
interpret, explain or just describe ideas they have learned. A rating of 5 under Indicator 3 – Developed
and applied effective teaching strategies to promote critical and creative thinking, as well as other
higher-order thinking skills which is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale
were given.

KRA 2: LEARNING ENVIRONMENT & DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS

OBJECTIVE 4: Worked with colleagues to model and shared effective techniques in the management
of classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical environments (PPST 2.3.3)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation.
During classroom observation, I facilitated well-planed learning activities appropriate to individual and
group needs within the available physical space and resources. As demonstrated by a score of 8 on
Indicator 4, I certainly met the objective – Worked with colleagues to model and shared effective
techniques in the management of classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in
groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical
environments. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory

ASHLEY GUINOO
 For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation.
During classroom observation, all learners were fully engaged in all activities utilizing the space and
time appropriate to their needs. As demonstrated by a score of 7 on Indicator 4, I certainly met the
objective – Worked with colleagues to model and shared effective techniques in the management of
classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical environments. This is equivalent to 4
points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 6 - Satisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation.
During classroom observation, it is evident that most learners work productively within allotted time,
physical space and resources. A score of 6 on Indicator 4, I certainly met the objective – Worked with
colleagues to model and shared effective techniques in the management of classroom structure to
engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on
activities within a range of physical environments. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 5 - Unsatisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation.
Classroom layout is simple and somewhat suitable for different learning activities. A score of 5 on
Indicator 4, – Worked with colleagues to model and shared effective techniques in the management
of classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical environments were given. This is
equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

OBJECTIVE 5: Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying positive
and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-focused environments (PPST 2.6.3)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 2 - Objective 5, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I
constructively managed learner behavior by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure a
learning-focused environment. The fact that I received a rating of 8 on Indicator 5 indicates that I
achieved the goal. – Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by applying
positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-focused environments. This is equivalent to 5
points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 2 - Objective 5, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet from an
Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I responded
appropriately to the misbehavior of my learners at all times without any loss of instructional time. A
rating of 7 on Indicator 5 indicates that I achieved the goal. – Exhibited effective and constructive
behavior management skills by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-
focused environments. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 - Satisfactory

ASHLEY GUINOO
For KRA 2 - Objective 5, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet from an
Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I frequently
manage learners’ behavior against established rules of conduct and most of learners follow such. A
rating of 6 on Indicator 5 – Exhibited effective and constructive behavior management skills by
applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-focused environments. were given.
This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 - Unsatisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 5, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet from an
Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation I occasionally managed misbehavior of my pupils against established rules of
conduct and majority of them follow such rules. A rating of 5 on Indicator 5 – Exhibited effective and
constructive behavior management skills by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure
learning-focused environments. were given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.

OBJECTIVE 6: Worked with colleagues to share differentiated developmentally appropriate learning

experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences (PPST 3.1.3)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, differentiated and developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address
the diverse learning needs were evident. As indicated, I received a rating of 8 on Indicator – Used
differentiated developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender,
needs, strengths, interests and experiences. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS
Rating Scale.

Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
the delivery of lesson, differentiated strategies that motivate and engage group of learners at their
cognitive levels, allowing them to achieve the learning outcomes were provided. A rating of 7 on
Indicator 6 – Used differentiated developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences were given. This is equivalent to 4
points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 - Satisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, differentiated and developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address
the diverse learning needs were evident. A rating of 6 on Indicator 6 – Used differentiated
developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths,

ASHLEY GUINOO
interests and experiences were given. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating
Scale.

Rating of 5 - Unsatisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, differentiated and developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address
the learning needs for most were evident. A rating of 5 on Indicator 6 – Used differentiated
developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences were given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS
Rating Scale.

KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning

OBJECTIVE 7: Developed and applied effective strategies in the planning and management of
developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied
teaching contexts (PPST 4.1.3)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 3 - Objective 7, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. As a
teacher, I managed well-structured lessons with emphasis on explicit connections between previous
learning and new concepts and skills. The fact that I received a rating of 8 on Indicator 7 indicates that
I achieved the goal. – Developed and applied effective strategies in the planning and management
of developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements
and varied teaching contexts. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 3 - Objective 7, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
the delivery of lesson, the sequenced of activities purposely scaffolds learners toward achieving the
lesson’s objectives. A rating of on Indicator 7 indicates that I achieved the goal. – Developed and
applied effective strategies in the planning and management of developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts.
This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Satisfactory
For KRA 3 - Objective 7, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
the delivery of lesson, I managed to implement lessons with appropriate elements of developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning processes. A rating of 6 on Indicator 7 indicates that I achieved the
goal. – Developed and applied effective strategies in the planning and management of
developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and
varied teaching contexts. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

ASHLEY GUINOO
Rating of 5 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 3 - Objective 7, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
the delivery of lesson, I was not able to demonstrate understanding of the pre-requisite relationships
when planning and there where some problems with the lesson strategies that negatively impacted
learning. A rating of 5 on Indicator 7 – Developed and applied effective strategies in the planning
and management of developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts. were given. This is equivalent to 2 points
(Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 8: Reviews with colleagues, teacher and learner feedback to plan, facilitate, and enrich
teaching practice (PPST 4.4.3)
MOVs:
1. Approved LAC Plan
2. Minutes of LAC, FGD session, or other collegial discussions with proof of attendance
3. Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 3 - Objective 8, I have attached my approved LAC Plan, minutes of meeting conducted
together with PMCF across 4 quarters highlighting how I guided my colleagues in planning for coaching
and mentoring sessions to plan, facilitate and enrich their teaching practice using teacher and learner
feedback. The fact that I gained a rating 8 on Indicator 8 implies that I accomplished the objective –
Reviews with colleagues, teacher and learner feedback to plan, facilitate, and enrich teaching
practice. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 3 - Objective 8, I have attached minutes of LAC/FGD session/other collegial
discussions with proof of attendance highlighting agreements and recommendations on the review of
teacher and learner feedback across 3 quarters. A rating of 7 on Indicator 8 – Reviews with colleagues,
teacher and learner feedback to plan, facilitate, and enrich teaching practice. were given. This is
equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Satisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 8, I have attached minutes of collegial discussions attended showing that
how I facilitated with my colleagues teacher and learner feedback across 2 quarters. A rating of 6 on
Indicator 8 – Reviews with colleagues, teacher and learner feedback to plan, facilitate, and enrich
teaching practice. were given. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 8, I have attached my approved LAC Plan showing how I planned the
conduct of coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions to
review teacher and learner feedback for 1 quarter only. A rating of 5 on Indicator 8 Reviews with
colleagues, teacher and learner feedback to plan, facilitate, and enrich teaching practice were
given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

ASHLEY GUINOO
OBJECTIVE 9: Advised and guided colleagues in the selection, organization, development and use of
appropriate teaching and learning resources including ICT, to address learning goals (PPST 4.5.3)
MOVs:
1. Proof/s of attendance in coaching and mentoring sessions/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial
discussions that highlights the objective
2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/FGDs/other collegial discussions that
highlights the objective
3. Reflection Notes of teachers on the coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC
sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions that highlights the objective with proof/s of attendance.
4. Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form (PMCF) with annotations
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached a copy of my Performance Monitoring and Coaching
Form with annotations highlighting how I guided my colleagues in planning for the selection,
organization, development and use of appropriate teaching and learning resources including ICT, to
address specific goals during coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/FGDs/other
collegial discussion across 4 quarters. As a result, I obtained a rating of 8 on Indicator 9 which signifies
that I attained the objective – Advised and guided colleagues in the selection, organization,
development and use of appropriate teaching and learning resources including ICT, to address
learning goals. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory
For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached reflection notes of teachers on the coaching and
mentoring sessions/meetings/FGDs/other collegial discussions. To address specific learning goals,
discussion with colleagues across 3 quarters were evident. As a result, I obtained a rating of 7 on
Indicator 9 which signifies that I attained the objective – Advised and guided colleagues in the
selection, organization, development and use of appropriate teaching and learning resources
including ICT, to address learning goals. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 6 – Satisfactory
For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached minutes of coaching and mentoring
sessions/meetings/FGDs/other collegial discussions showing how I advised and guided colleagues in the
selection, organization, development and use of appropriate teaching and learning resources including
ICT, to address specific goals across 3 quarters. As a result, I obtained a rating of 6 on Indicator 9
which signifies that I attained the objective – Advised and guided colleagues in the selection,
organization, development and use of appropriate teaching and learning resources including ICT,
to address learning goals. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 5 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached proof of attendance in coaching and mentoring
sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions in 1 quarter only. A rating of 5 on
Indicator 9 – Advised and guided colleagues in the selection, organization, development and use of
appropriate teaching and learning resources including ICT, to address learning goals. were given.
This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
KRA 4: ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING
OBJECTIVE 10: Worked collaboratively with colleagues to review design, selection, organization and
used of a range of effective diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements (PPST 5.1.3)
ASHLEY GUINOO
MOVs:
1. Proof/s of attendance in coaching and mentoring sessions/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial
discussions that highlights the objective
2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/FGDs/other collegial discussions that
highlights the objective
3. Reflection Notes of teachers on the coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC
sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions that highlights the objective with proof/s of attendance.
4. Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form (PMCF) with annotations
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 4 - Objective 10, I have attached a copy of Performance Monitoring and Coaching
Form (PMCF)/ Reflection Notes of teachers on the coaching and mentoring sessions showing how I
guided them on planning of the design, selection, organization and used of a range of effective
diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with the curriculum requirements
across 4 quarters. As indicated, I received a rating of 8 on Indicator 10 – Worked collaboratively with
colleagues to review design, selection, organization and used of a range of effective diagnostic,
formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements. This is
equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory
For KRA 4 - Objective 10, I have attached reflection notes of teachers on the coaching and
mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussion showing how I synthesized
discussion with colleagues them on the design, selection, organization and used of a range of effective
diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with the curriculum requirements
across 3 quarters.. As indicated, I received a rating of 7 on Indicator 10 – Worked collaboratively
with colleagues to review design, selection, organization and used of a range of effective diagnostic,
formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements. This is
equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 6 – Satisfactory
For KRA 4 - Objective 10, I have attached reflection notes showing how I conducted coaching
and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions to review the design,
selection, organization and used of a range of effective diagnostic, formative and summative assessment
strategies consistent with the curriculum requirements across 2 quarters. A rating of 6 on Indicator 10 –
Worked collaboratively with colleagues to review design, selection, organization and used of a
range of effective diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements were given. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating
Scale.
Rating of 5 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 4 - Objective 10, I have attached proof/s of attendance/minutes of meeting showing
how I planned for the conduct of coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions, FGDs/other
collegial discussion in 1 quarter only . A rating of 5 on Indicator 10 – Worked collaboratively with
colleagues to review design, selection, organization and used of a range of effective diagnostic,
formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements were
given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 11: Interpreted collaboratively monitoring and evaluation strategies of attainment data to
support learner progress and achievement (PPST 5.2.3)
MOVs:
1. Approved LAC/FGD Plan
2. Any proof of communication with colleagues
3. Results of collaborative interpretation
4. Minutes of LAC, FGD session, or other meetings with proof of attendance
5. Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form with annotations

ASHLEY GUINOO
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 4 - Objective 11, I have attached a copy of PMCF/Minutes of LAC/FGDs/or other
meetings showing how I guided colleagues in the planning for the application of results of interpretation
of monitoring and evaluation strategies of attainment data to support learner progress and achievement
during coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions. As a
result, I achieved a rating of 8 on Indicator 11, demonstrating that I reached the objective. – Interpreted
collaboratively monitoring and evaluation strategies of attainment data to support learner
progress and achievement. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 4 - Objective 11, I have attached a copy of PMCF/Minutes of LAC/FGDs/or other
meetings showing how I synthesized discussions with colleagues on monitoring and evaluation of
strategies of attainment data during coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC
sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions across 3 quarters. I achieved a rating of 7 on Indicator 11–
Interpreted collaboratively monitoring and evaluation strategies of attainment data to support
learner progress and achievement. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS
Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 - Satisfactory
For KRA 4 - Objective 11, I have attached a copy of minutes of LAC/FGDs/or other
meetings/results of collaborative interpretation showing how I conducted coaching and mentoring
sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions on monitoring and evaluation of
strategies of attainment data across 2 quarters. I achieved a rating of 6 on Indicator 11– Interpreted
collaboratively monitoring and evaluation strategies of attainment data to support learner
progress and achievement. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 - Unsatisfactory
For KRA 4 - Objective 11, I have attached proof of communication with colleagues/approved
LAC/FGD Plan showing how I planned the conduct of coaching and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC
sessions/FGDs/other collegial discussions on monitoring and evaluation of strategies of attainment data
to interpret collaboratively monitoring and evaluation strategies of attainment data in 1 quarter only. I
achieved a rating of 5 on Indicator 11– Interpreted collaboratively monitoring and evaluation
strategies of attainment data to support learner progress and achievement. This is equivalent to 3
points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 12: Applied skills in the effective communication of learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians (PPST 5.4.3)
MOVs: Any one (1) of the following:
1. Sample of learners’ test results signed by parents and corresponding evidence of improvement
2. Attendance sheets/Minutes of parent-teacher conference
3. Record of dialogue and/or parent-teacher or teacher conferences and corresponding evidence of
improvement
4. Anecdotal record
5. Sample of accomplished rubrics for learners at risk signed by parents
6. Signed report cards of student at risk
7. Accomplished home visitation forms

ASHLEY GUINOO
8. Proof of communication with wider school-community stakeholders
ANNOTATION:
For KRA 4 - Objective 12, I have attached a copy of (any one in the list) showing how I utilized
effective strategies to communicate learner needs, progress and achievement to wider school-community
stakeholders across 4 quarters. In Indicator 12, I got a rating of 8, demonstrating that I achieved the
objective – Applied skills in the effective communication of learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians This is equivalent to 5 points
(Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 4 - Objective 12, I have attached a copy of (any one in the list) showing how I utilized
effective strategies to communicate learner needs, progress and achievement to parents/guardians across
3 quarters. In Indicator 12, I got a rating of 7 – Applied skills in the effective communication of
learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians This
is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 6 - Satisfactory
For KRA 4 - Objective 12, I have attached a copy of (any one in the list) showing how I utilized
effective strategies to communicate learner needs, progress and achievement to internal stakeholders
across 2 quarters. In Indicator 12, I got a rating of 6 – Applied skills in the effective communication
of learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians
This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 5 - Unsatisfactory
For KRA 4 - Objective 12, I have attached a copy of (any one in the list) showing how I utilized
effective strategies to communicate learner needs, progress and achievement to learners within the class
in only 1 quarter. In Indicator 12, I got a rating of 5 – Applied skills in the effective communication
of learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians
This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

KRA 5: PERSONAL GROWTH AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

OBJECTIVE 13: Manifested a learner-centered teaching philosophy in various aspects of practice and
support colleagues in enhancing their own learner-centered teaching philosophy. (PPST 7.1.3)
MOVs:
A reflection/journal entry in the following documents that highlights the manifestation of a
learner-centered teaching philosophy in any of the following
1. PMCF
2. Sample lesson plans of colleague/s with annotations
3. Minutes of LAC sessions
4. Approved LAC Plan
5. Lesson plan exemplar during LAC Session
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 5 - Objective 13, I have attached a copy of (any of the MOVs listed) that details the
consistent involvement of learners in the teaching-learning process resulting from the application of a
personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-centered across 4 quarters. As a result, in Indicator 13, I
ASHLEY GUINOO
obtained a rating of 8 indicating that I met the objective – Manifested a learner-centered teaching
philosophy in various aspects of practice and support colleagues in enhancing their own learner-
centered teaching philosophy. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory
For KRA 5 - Objective 13, I have attached a copy of (any of the MOVs listed) that reflects
involvement of learners in the teaching-learning process resulting from the application of a personal
philosophy of teaching that is learner centered across 3 quarters. As a result, in Indicator 13, I obtained
a rating of 7 – Manifested a learner-centered teaching philosophy in various aspects of practice
and support colleagues in enhancing their own learner-centered teaching philosophy. This is
equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 6 - Satisfactory
For KRA 5 - Objective 13, I have attached a copy of (any of the MOVs listed) that shows the
application of a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-centered across 2 quarters. I obtained a
rating of 6 – Manifested a learner-centered teaching philosophy in various aspects of practice and
support colleagues in enhancing their own learner-centered teaching philosophy. This is equivalent
to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 5 - Unsatisfactory
For KRA 5 - Objective 13, I have attached a copy of (any of the MOVs listed) that it indicates a
personal philosophy of teaching that is not learner-centered in one quarter only. I obtained a rating of 5
– Manifested a learner-centered teaching philosophy in various aspects of practice and support
colleagues in enhancing their own learner-centered teaching philosophy. This is equivalent to 2
points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

OBJECTIVE 14: Reflected on the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers to plan personal
professional development goals and assist colleagues in planning and achieving their own goals. (PPST
7.5.3)
MOVs:
1. Certification from the ICT Coordinator/School Head/Focal person in-charge of e-SAT
2. IPCRF-DP
3. PMCF
4. Mid-Year Review Form (MRF)
5. Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II

ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 - Outstanding
For KRA 5 - Objective 14, I was able to prove that I set professional development goals based on
the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers by attaching a copy of my updated IPCRF-
Development Plan during the Phase II of the RPMS cycle and submitted all other acceptable MOVs
within the prescribed RPMS Phase. As a result, in Indicator 14, I obtained a rating of 8 signifies that I
obtained the objective – Reflected on the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers to plan
personal professional development goals and assist colleagues in planning and achieving their own
goals. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory

ASHLEY GUINOO
For KRA 5 - Objective 14, I was able to prove that discussed progress on professional development goals
with the rater during the mid-year review as evidenced by MOV No. 4. I obtained a rating of 7 on Indicator
14 – Reflected on the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers to plan personal professional
development goals and assist colleagues in planning and achieving their own goals. This is
equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 - Satisfactory
For KRA 5 - Objective 14, I was able to prove that I set professional development goals based on e-
SAT results as evidenced by MOV No. 2 or 3. A rating of 6 signifies that I obtained the objective –
Reflected on the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers to plan personal professional
development goals and assist colleagues in planning and achieving their own goals. This is
equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 5 - Objective 14, I was able to prove that I accomplished the e-SAT at the beginning of the
school year as evidenced by MOV No. 1. A rating of 5 on Indicator 14 – Reflected on the Philippine
Professional Standards for Teachers to plan personal professional development goals and assist
colleagues in planning and achieving their own goals. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory)
in the RPMS Rating Scale.

PLUS FACTOR
OBJECTIVE 15: Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching and
learning process
MOVs: Certificates
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 8 – Outstanding
For Objective 15, I have attached certificates with pictures of my active participation as I
performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching and learning process beyond
the School/Community Learning Center (CLC) across 4 quarters. As a result, in Indicator 15, I obtained
a rating of 8 implies that I achieved the objective – Performed various related works/activities that
contribute to the teaching and learning process. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 7 – Very Satisfactory

For Objective 15, I have attached certificates with pictures of my active participation as I
performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching and learning process within
the school / Community Learning Center (CLC) as evidenced by submitted MOV across 3 quarters.
As a result, in Indicator 15, I obtained a rating of 7– Performed various related works/activities that
contribute to the teaching and learning process. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in
the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 - Satisfactory

For Objective 15, I have attached certificates with pictures of my active participation as I performed
various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching and learning process within the learning
area / department as evidenced by submitted MOV across 2 quarters. As a result, in Indicator 15, I
ASHLEY GUINOO
obtained a rating of 6– Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching
and learning process. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 - Unsatisfactory

For Objective 15, I have attached certificates with pictures of my active participation as I performed
various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching and learning process within the class as
evidenced by submitted MOV in 1 quarter only. As a result, in Indicator 15, I obtained a rating of 5–
Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching and learning process.
This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

ASHLEY GUINOO