Ascetic Shadows in Pulp Fiction:

Unveiling Self-Mortification in Dan

Brown's The Da Vinci Code
Abstract
Dan Brown's novel, The Da Vinci Code, explores the theme of self-mortification through the
character of Silas. Contrary to traditional portrayals, Brown presents these acts as a spectacle
that intersects with identity and secret societies. The novel raises questions about the nature of
religious fanaticism and compels a re-evaluation of self-inflicted pain in the pursuit of spirituality.
Despite critiques, The Da Vinci Code sheds light on an obscure practice and serves as both a
literary exploration and cultural case study. Also Compare it with other religious practices
worldwide.

The essay explores the theme of self-mortification in Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code, focusing
on the character of Silas and its intersection with identity, secret societies, and religious
fanaticism. It also compares this practice with other religious practices worldwide.

1. Introduction
Undoubtedly, Dan Brown's novel The Da Vinci Code has made an enduring impact on popular
culture. Having sold over 60 million copies worldwide, the novel has generated widespread
interest and controversy. The narrative revolves around Opus Dei, a small Catholic religious
organization, and its portrayal in the novel has garnered significant attention. Silas, an albino
monk who goes to extremes, including murder, in the name of Opus Dei, emerges as a central
antagonist in the story.
The success of The Da Vinci Code has prompted a reassessment of historical and religious
narratives. While the novel blends fact and fiction, it challenges long-standing beliefs about
religion and history. Brown's assertions about the factual basis of the story have been met with
criticism for blurring the boundaries between reality and imagination.
The exploration of self-mortification in The Da Vinci Code intersects with themes of identity,
clandestine societies, and religious fanaticism. It raises inquiries about the historical context of
self-inflicted pain in spiritual practices and its influence on spiritual growth. Furthermore,
considerations of criticisms of self-mortification practices and their cultural significance are
crucial aspects to ponder.
The popularity of The Da Vinci Code has also sparked comparisons with other religious
practices around the world. By exposing a wider audience to non-canonical literature and
alternative interpretations of historical events, the novel has brought diverse religious
perspectives to light.
In summary, Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code challenges traditional narratives about religion
and history. It encourages readers to question deeply held beliefs while sparking discussions
about truth and fiction. See references: (Biondich, 2007, pages 76-80)[6], (da4db484d6b03ae8,
2012, pages 1-5)[7].
Figure 1: Cryptex Da Vinci Code Mini Cryptex Lock Puzzle Box (source: reference (Dutta &
Lealos, 2023)[12])

2. Self-mortification in The Da Vinci

Code

2.1. Introduction to self-mortification

The practice of self-mortification, commonly linked to religious rituals, has been a topic of
interest in various literary and historical settings. The term "self-mortification" refers to the act of
inflicting pain or suffering on oneself as a form of religious devotion or spiritual discipline. This
concept has been deeply examined by Dan Brown in his novel The Da Vinci Code, particularly
through the character of Silas.
In the book, Silas is portrayed as a devoted member of the Catholic group Opus Dei, who
engages in self-flagellation as a means of atonement for his perceived sins. His extreme acts of
self-mortification emphasize the intersection between identity and clandestine societies, as well
as the portrayal of religious fanaticism. Silas's character serves as a lens through which Brown
examines the impact of self-inflicted pain on spiritual growth and the psychological motivations
behind such practices.
The historical context of self-inflicted pain in spiritual practices provides valuable insight into the
importance of self-mortification in The Da Vinci Code. Throughout history, various religious
traditions have embraced forms of self-mortification as a means of achieving spiritual
enlightenment or demonstrating devotion to a higher power. This historical backdrop adds depth
to the portrayal of Silas and his radical beliefs in the novel.
Critiques and cultural implications surrounding self-mortification practices are also worth
considering within the context of The Da Vinci Code. While some may view such practices as
expressions of extreme faith and dedication, others criticize them as harmful and unnecessary.
The cultural significance of self-inflicted pain is evident in the varied interpretations and
reactions to Silas's actions within the novel.
Comparisons with other religious practices worldwide highlight contrasting views on the
significance of self-inflicted pain across different cultures. By examining various religious
traditions involving self-mortification, it becomes evident that such practices elicit diverse
responses and hold different meanings within specific cultural contexts.
In conclusion, The Da Vinci Code provides a thought-provoking exploration of self-mortification,
particularly through its depiction of Silas and his extreme acts of penance. By delving into this
theme, Dan Brown raises important questions about spirituality, identity, and the cultural
significance of self-inflicted pain within religious contexts. See reference (us, 2014, pages 196-
200)[11].

Figure 2: Langdon kneels in front of the Louvre in The Da Vinci Code (source: reference (Dutta
& Lealos, 2023)[12])

2.2. Character of Silas

Silas is a multifaceted character in The Da Vinci Code, depicted as an albino Catholic monk
who practices self-flagellation and belongs to Opus Dei, a secretive faction of the Catholic
Church. His troubled upbringing in Marseilles, where he was rejected by his father for his
albinism and witnessed his mother being brutally beaten, likely influenced his inclination towards
self-mortification. Silas’s commitment to Opus Dei is evident through his practice of corporal
mortification, which includes wearing a spiked metal discipline belt called a cilice around his
thigh. However, it is noted that Silas sometimes takes his devotion to extremes, resulting in
significant pain and bloodshed.
The driving force behind Silas’s self-mortification seems to be his unwavering religious faith and
desire to demonstrate his dedication to God and Bishop Manuel Aringarosa. This fervent
religious zeal compels him to endure intense suffering as a means of drawing closer to God. His
level of devotion to Opus Dei surpasses that of his fellow numeraries, leading him to engage in
excessive corporal mortification as a way of proving his allegiance.
In terms of self-mortification methods, Silas practices corporal mortification by wearing the
spiked metal discipline belt and engaging in self-flagellation. This involves using a cordlike whip
to strike himself on the back or buttocks while reciting prayers. It is evident that this form of self-
inflicted pain takes both a physical and emotional toll on Silas, underscoring the depth of his
religious fervor.
Overall, Silas’s character in The Da Vinci Code serves as a representation of the extreme
measures individuals may undergo in expressing their religious devotion through self-
mortification. His background, motivations, and methods shed light on the intersection between
identity, religious fanaticism, and self-inflicted pain within the context of clandestine societies
like Opus Dei. See references: (No pain, no gain: A brief look at religious self-flagellation, 2014)
[4]
, (Biondich, 2007, pages 16-20)[6], (Shepherd Me As Your Heart Commands, A
Silas/Aringarosa 'Ship Manifesto, 2024)[14].

Figure 3: A discipline. A cordlike whip used during corporal mortification. Newly appointed Opus
Dei spokesperson Terri Carron tackled the topic of corporal mortification in an interview with
Diane Sawyer. (source: reference (Biondich, 2007)[6])

Figure 4: Silas points a gun in The Da Vinci Code (source: reference (Dutta & Lealos, 2023) [12])
2.3. Intersection with identity and secret societies
The topic of self-mortification and its connection to identity in Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code is
a multifaceted and intricate issue. The character of Silas, an albino Opus Dei monk, plays a
pivotal role in the novel, embodying the extreme practices of self-mortification. Silas partakes in
acts of self-flagellation and corporal mortification as a way to purify himself and showcase his
dedication to his beliefs. This intense form of self-inflicted pain is deeply intertwined with Silas'
identity as a devout follower of Opus Dei, emphasizing the correlation between self-mortification
and religious zeal.
Moreover, the involvement of clandestine societies in self-mortification practices adds another
dimension to the exploration of this theme. In the novel, Opus Dei is depicted as a secretive and
influential organization within the Catholic Church, with members like Silas engaging in extreme
acts of self-mortification to demonstrate their loyalty to the group. This portrayal raises inquiries
about the intersection between identity, religious convictions, and group affiliation, as well as the
cultural significance of self-inflicted pain within certain secretive organizations.
The depiction of self-mortification within the context of secret societies also highlights the
cultural implications of these practices. It raises significant questions about power dynamics
within these organizations and how extreme forms of self-inflicted pain are utilized to showcase
allegiance and dedication. Additionally, it encourages critical contemplations on the role of
secrecy and ritualistic practices within religious institutions, shedding light on how such
practices can intersect with personal identity and group membership.
In conclusion, The Da Vinci Code offers a thought-provoking examination of self-mortification in
relation to identity and secretive societies. Through its portrayal of characters like Silas and their
involvement in extreme acts of self-inflicted pain within covert religious organizations like Opus
Dei, the novel encourages critical reflections on religious fanaticism, group membership, and
cultural implications of such practices. See references: (The Da Vinci Code: Fact, Fiction, and
Religious Friction, 2024)[1], (News, 2024)[8], (Truth Is Stranger than Fiction: The Da Vinci Code
and Early Christianity, 2024)[9], (Dutta & Lealos, 2023)[12].

Figure 5: The Holy Grail The Da Vinci Code (source: reference (Dutta & Lealos, 2023)[12])
Figure 6: A woman protesting against The Da Vinci Code film outside a movie theater in Culver
City, California. The TFP acronym in the banner stands for the American Society for the
Defense of Tradition, Family and Property. (source: reference (Criticism of The Da Vinci Code -
Wikipedia, 2024)[5])

2.4. Religious fanaticism

The theme of self-mortification and its connection to identity in Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code
is a complex and intricate issue. The character of Silas, an albino Opus Dei monk, plays a
crucial role in the novel, embodying the extreme practices of self-mortification. Silas engages in
acts of self-flagellation and corporal mortification as a way to purify himself and demonstrate his
dedication to his beliefs. This intense form of self-inflicted pain is deeply intertwined with Silas'
identity as a devout follower of Opus Dei, highlighting the correlation between self-mortification
and religious zeal.
Furthermore, the involvement of clandestine societies in self-mortification practices adds
another layer to the exploration of this theme. In the novel, Opus Dei is depicted as a secretive
and influential organization within the Catholic Church, with members like Silas participating in
extreme acts of self-mortification to show their loyalty to the group. This portrayal raises
questions about the intersection between identity, religious convictions, and group affiliation, as
well as the cultural significance of self-inflicted pain within certain secretive organizations.
The depiction of self-mortification within the context of secret societies also emphasizes the
cultural implications of these practices. It raises significant questions about power dynamics
within these organizations and how extreme forms of self-inflicted pain are used to demonstrate
allegiance and dedication. Additionally, it encourages critical contemplations on the role of
secrecy and ritualistic practices within religious institutions, shedding light on how such
practices can intersect with personal identity and group membership.
In conclusion, The Da Vinci Code offers a thought-provoking examination of self-mortification in
relation to identity and secretive societies. Through its portrayal of characters like Silas and their
involvement in extreme acts of self-inflicted pain within covert religious organizations like Opus
Dei, the novel prompts critical reflections on religious fanaticism, group membership, and
cultural implications of such practices. See references: (Operation-Lemonade-Opus-Dei-s-
public-relations-campaign-against-i-The-Da-Vinci-Code-i-, 2024, pages 51-55)[2], (The Da Vinci
Code: Separating Fact From Fiction, 2018)[3], (Biondich, 2007, pages 16-20)[6].

Figure 7: Tom Hanks and Audrey Tautou running down the street in the Da Vinci Code (source:
reference (Dutta & Lealos, 2023)[12])

Figure 8: The Da Vinci Code: Fact, Fiction, and Religious Friction (source: reference (The Da
Vinci Code: Fact, Fiction, and Religious Friction, 2024)[1])
3. Re-evaluation of self-inflicted pain in
spirituality

3.1. Historical context of self-inflicted pain in spiritual

practices
The issue of self-inflicted pain as a spiritual practice is a complex and multifaceted topic that has
been examined from various angles. During the Victorian era, self-harming behaviors were
approached from a psychiatric perspective, with experts in mental health developing a
vocabulary to describe these behaviors based on literary examples and case studies. Violent
forms of self-harm, such as self-mutilation, were of particular interest to psychiatrists at the time.
The connection between self-harm and sexuality was also explored in the works of Richard Von
Kraft Ebbing and Sigmund Freud, who identified a correlation between violence and sexual
pleasure in their studies on masochism and sexual sadism.
Religious influences on self-inflicted pain were also significant during this period. Self-mutilation
was perceived as inherent to Christian religion, with nineteenth-century psychiatric assumptions
suggesting its link to religious traditions and indication of insanity. Acts of self-torture were often
associated with excessively fervent religious devotion or fanaticism, with monastic flagellations
in the Christian church serving as examples of self-torture for expiation of sin.
Furthermore, the representation of female corporeality and martyrdom in Victorian women's
writing added another dimension to the historical context of self-inflicted pain in spiritual
practices. Texts depicting acts of martyrdom simultaneously encompassed both traditional and
radical representations, underscoring the tension between conventional feminine ideals and the
dramatic portrayal of bodily suffering. The use of martyrdom and religious self-sacrifice as
literary devices reflected the complexity of female bodily display within Victorian patriarchy.
The interplay between spirituality, gender identity, and societal expectations played a pivotal
role in shaping the historical context of self-inflicted pain in spiritual practices during the
Victorian era. These influences continue to echo through contemporary discussions about self-
mortification and its implications for spiritual growth and personal identity. See reference (us,
2014, pages 186-190)[11].
Figure 9: Leigh Teabing and Robert Langdon Sir Ian McKellen Tom Hanks Da Vinci Code
(source: reference (Dutta & Lealos, 2023)[12])

3.2. Impact of self-mortification on spiritual growth

In Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code, the portrayal of self-mortification serves as a profound
exploration of the impact of self-inflicted pain on spiritual growth. Through the character of Silas,
the novel delves into the intricate intersection of religious fanaticism, identity, and secret
societies. Silas embodies a fervent believer who engages in self-mortification as a means of
atonement and purification, shedding light on the historical context where self-inflicted pain was
deeply intertwined with spiritual practices across different cultures.
The depiction of self-mortification raises crucial questions about its impact on spiritual
development, challenging conventional notions of sacrifice and penance. It urges readers to
reconsider the motivations behind such practices and brings to the forefront the historical
significance of self-inflicted pain in spirituality, illuminating its role in shaping religious traditions
and beliefs.
Critiques and cultural implications surrounding self-mortification are also explored through Silas'
character, prompting an examination of the cultural significance of self-inflicted pain. The novel
encourages engagement with criticisms and alternative perspectives on this practice, inviting
readers to consider diverse viewpoints on the role of self-mortification in spiritual growth.
Furthermore, The Da Vinci Code offers a platform for comparing self-mortification with other
religious practices worldwide, providing an overview of various religious traditions involving self-
inflicted pain and contrasting views on its significance across different cultures. This
comparative analysis enriches the exploration of self-mortification by situating it within a global
religious context.
Ultimately, Brown's portrayal prompts a re-evaluation of self-inflicted pain in spirituality by
weaving together historical, cultural, and critical perspectives. It challenges readers to confront
the complexities surrounding self-mortification and its implications for spiritual growth. See
references: (No pain, no gain: A brief look at religious self-flagellation, 2014)[4], (us, 2014, pages
41-45)[11].
4. Critiques and cultural implications

4.1. Criticisms of self-mortification practices

Critiques of self-mortification practices can be found in a multitude of literary and historical
settings. One area where criticism is particularly prevalent is in the Victorian religious context,
where self-starvation, self-mutilation, and alcoholic bodies were depicted as forms of self-harm.
The use of these practices as narrative tropes in literature has been condemned for
romanticizing and idealizing women's bodily suffering, blurring the boundaries between
spirituality and violent sexual desire, and eroding the distinctions between private and public
exhibition.
Feminist writers like Mona Caird have also censured the portrayal of sacrificial women in mid-
Victorian novels, arguing against the glorification of self-sacrifice and submission as virtues.
Caird's works challenge traditional forms of marriage and socially-enforced motherhood, holding
them responsible for the anguish endured by her characters. She contends that the merging of
Christian ideas of divine surrender with bodily obligations required by marriage and motherhood
is deeply problematic.
Moreover, criticism can be found in contemporary literature that depicts alcoholism as a means
of fleeing societal pressures. Authors such as Mary Angela Dickens depict alcoholic self-harm
as a subversive yet hazardous strategy for female rebellion. These texts sensualize the
damaged female body under patriarchy, blurring the lines between public and private spaces.
In addition to literary critiques, there have been allegations of plagiarism surrounding Dan
Brown's The Da Vinci Code. These allegations have raised doubts about the factual foundation
of Brown's novel and its depiction of history. Critics argue that Brown has presented his novel
as an accurate representation of historical facts while blending truth and fiction to create a
clever mix that may mislead readers about what is historically accurate.
In conclusion, criticisms of self-mortification practices exist in a variety of literary, historical, and
factual contexts. They address issues such as glorification of suffering, erasure of personal
agency, misrepresentation of history, and distortion of past reality for artistic purposes. See
references: (The Da Vinci Code: Fact, Fiction, and Religious Friction, 2024)[1], (Criticism of The
Da Vinci Code - Wikipedia, 2024)[5], (us, 2014, pages 186-190)[11], (Boyer, 2006)[13].
Figure 10: Cryptex in The Da Vinci Code Tom Hanks (source: reference (Dutta & Lealos, 2023)
[12]
)

4.2. Cultural significance of self-inflicted pain

The portrayal of self-inflicted pain in literature and popular media is a contentious and intricate
subject, with Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code serving as a prime example. In the novel, the
character Silas engages in self-mortification as a display of his religious fervor, intersecting with
the identity of secret societies like Opus Dei. However, it should be noted that the depiction of
Opus Dei members engaging in bloody mortifications is inaccurate, leading to criticism of the
novel for perpetuating misconceptions about the organization.
The representation of self-inflicted pain in The Da Vinci Code prompts inquiry into its cultural
significance and impact on spirituality. Throughout history, self-inflicted pain has been
intertwined with spiritual practices, with some religious figures partaking in acts of self-harm.
Yet, the effect of such practices on spiritual development remains a topic of contention, as some
view it as a path to enlightenment while others condemn it as unnecessary and potentially
detrimental.
Moreover, the cultural implications of self-inflicted pain are evident in diverse religious traditions
worldwide, each with their own forms of self-mortification ranging from fasting to more extreme
practices. These variations underscore the cultural diversity in interpreting the significance of
self-inflicted pain within a spiritual framework.
In literature and art, depictions of self-harm have sparked controversy, often used as a tool to
challenge societal norms and patriarchal systems. However, there is also a risk of romanticizing
or sexualizing female self-harm, as evidenced in Victorian literature portraying martyrdom and
self-injury.
Overall, The Da Vinci Code's portrayal of self-mortification raises important questions about its
cultural significance and implications for spirituality. The interplay with secret societies adds
complexity to this discourse, shedding light on the intricacies surrounding perceptions of
religious fervor and identity within such organizations. See references: (607, 2018, pages 6-10)
[10]
, (us, 2014, pages 56-60)[11].
5. Comparison with other religious
practices worldwide

5.1. Overview of various religious practices involving

self-mortification
The practice of self-mortification has been a prevalent aspect of diverse religious traditions and
cultures across the globe. It has frequently served as a means to demonstrate dedication, seek
spiritual advancement, or seek penance for wrongdoing. In Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code,
this concept is prominently featured through the character of Silas, an albino monk who
engages in self-flagellation as a form of repentance.
The depiction of self-mortification in The Da Vinci Code intersects with themes of religious
extremism and identity. Silas' extreme acts of self-inflicted pain stem from his belief that he is
fulfilling God's will. This highlights the perilous consequences of religious fanaticism, as Silas
becomes a violent antagonist motivated by his fervent devotion.
When examining various religious practices involving self-mortification, it is essential to consider
the historical context and impact on spiritual development. The act of self-flagellation has been
observed in certain branches of Christianity during penitential processions, where it is intended
to symbolize the suffering of Jesus before his crucifixion. Individuals in other cultures engage in
painful practices as part of Passion Plays to demonstrate their steadfastness to their faith.
Critiques of self-mortification practices often focus on concerns about glorifying pain and
suffering. While some perceive it as a means to achieve spiritual enlightenment, others
condemn it for perpetuating harmful beliefs about the value of physical pain in religious
observance.
The cultural significance of self-inflicted pain varies widely across different societies and
religious traditions. While some cultures regard self-mortification as an integral part of their
spiritual rituals, others may reject it entirely. Understanding these diverse perspectives is crucial
in order to avoid misinterpretation or misrepresentation when discussing such practices.
Ultimately, the examination of various religious practices involving self-mortification offers
valuable insights into the complexities and diversity of human spirituality. It prompts us to
critically evaluate our perceptions and assumptions about these practices, while also
recognizing the deeply personal and cultural dimensions that shape them. See references: (No
pain, no gain: A brief look at religious self-flagellation, 2014)[4], (Dutta & Lealos, 2023)[12].

5.2. Contrasting views on the significance of self-

inflicted pain across different cultures
The practice of self-mortification differs widely across diverse cultures and religious traditions,
with varying perceptions of the significance of self-inflicted pain. In some societies, self-
mortification is considered a method for achieving spiritual purification and enlightenment. For
instance, in specific Hindu traditions, piercing the body with hooks or walking on hot coals is
believed to demonstrate the devotee's dedication to their faith and their ability to transcend
physical pain.
On the contrary, self-mortification has faced criticism in many Western societies, where it is
often seen as an extreme and harmful practice. Critics argue that inflicting pain on oneself can
lead to physical and psychological harm, and that true spiritual growth should not come at the
expense of one's well-being.
In The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown, the character of Silas illustrates a form of self-mortification
through his use of a cilice and a discipline. Silas engages in these acts as a means of
expressing his religious zealotry and dedication to his beliefs. However, this portrayal may be
seen as controversial due to its association with violent acts committed by Silas in the name of
his faith.
The contrasting perspectives on the significance of self-inflicted pain across different cultures
underscore the complexity of this practice. While some view it as a path to spiritual growth,
others see it as a harmful and extreme form of devotion. This raises questions about the cultural
significance of self-mortification and its role in shaping religious practices worldwide.
In conclusion, The Da Vinci Code offers a thought-provoking exploration of self-mortification
through its portrayal of Silas and his extreme acts of devotion. By examining these differing
viewpoints, we can gain a deeper understanding of how different cultures perceive the
significance of self-inflicted pain in their spiritual practices. See references:
(da4db484d6b03ae8, 2012, pages 6-10)[7], (Boyer, 2006)[13].

6. Conclusion
To sum up, Dan Brown's novel The Da Vinci Code explores the concept of self-mortification
through the character of Silas, a devoted member of Opus Dei who inflicts physical pain on
himself as a form of religious devotion. This portrayal raises inquiries about the intersection of
identity, clandestine organizations, and religious fanaticism. The novel also reconsiders the
practice of self-inflicted pain in spirituality by examining its historical context in various religious
traditions. It implies that self-mortification can impact spiritual growth, but it also raises criticisms
and cultural implications surrounding such practices.
The depiction of self-mortification in The Da Vinci Code invites a comparison with other religious
practices globally, illuminating divergent perspectives on the significance of self-inflicted pain
across different cultures. This comparison helps to place the significance and implications of
self-mortification within the broader spectrum of religious beliefs and practices.
In general, Dan Brown's exploration of self-mortification in The Da Vinci Code presents a
thought-provoking portrayal that encourages readers to contemplate the complexities and
nuances surrounding this controversial practice within the context of spirituality and religious
devotion. See references: (The Da Vinci Code: Fact, Fiction, and Religious Friction, 2024) [1],
(Operation-Lemonade-Opus-Dei-s-public-relations-campaign-against-i-The-Da-Vinci-Code-i-,
2024, pages 66-70)[2], (Biondich, 2007, pages 36-40)[6].

References
● [1] The Da Vinci Code: Fact, Fiction, and Religious Friction. (2024).
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/da-vinci-code-fact-fiction-religious-friction-jeremy-muller
● [2] Operation-Lemonade-Opus-Dei-s-public-relations-campaign-against-i-The-Da-Vinci-
Code-i-. (2024). https://cedejbiblioteca.unav.edu/web/centro-de-estudios-josemaria-
escriva/biblioteca-virtual/high.raw?
id=0000013534&name=00000001.original.pdf&attachment=Operation+Lemonade
%3A+Opus+Dei%27s+public+relations+campaign+against+%3Ci
%3EThe+Da+Vinci+Code%3C%2Fi%3E..pdf
● [3] The Da Vinci Code: Separating Fact From Fiction. (2018).
 https://discoveryseries.org/courses/the-da-vinci-code-separating-fact-from-fiction/
lessons/16762-2/
● [4] No pain, no gain: A brief look at religious self-flagellation. (2014).
https://drmarkgriffiths.wordpress.com/2014/04/28/no-pain-no-gain-a-brief-look-at-
religious-self-flagellation/
● [5] Criticism of The Da Vinci Code - Wikipedia. (2024).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_The_Da_Vinci_Code
● [6] Kirsten Biondich. (2007). biondich_k.
https://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/uf/e0/02/10/07/00001/biondich_k.pdf
● [7] da4db484d6b03ae8. (2012). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/pdf/da4db484d6b03ae8
● [8] ABC News. (2024). Opus Dei Members Decry 'Da Vinci' Portrayal.
https://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=1863277&page=1
● [9] Truth Is Stranger than Fiction: The Da Vinci Code and Early Christianity. (2024).
https://www.elca.org/JLE/Articles/636
● [10] 607. (2018). https://acadpubl.eu/hub/2018-119-15/4/607.pdf
● [11] us. (2014). Spectacles of Suffering: Self-Harm in New Woman Writing 1880-1900.
https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/files/5948642/Alex_Messem_Thesis.pdf
● [12] Debopriyaa Dutta, Shawn S. Lealos. (2023). Da Vinci Code True Story: What's Real
& What's Fake. https://screenrant.com/da-vinci-code-movie-true-story-real-fake/
● [13] Peter J. Boyer. (2006). Marketing "The Da Vinci Code" to Christians.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/05/22/hollywood-heresy
● [14] Shepherd Me As Your Heart Commands, A Silas/Aringarosa 'Ship Manifesto. (2024).
https://ship-manifesto.livejournal.com/173731.html