Consumer Reports - April 2017

Mazda MX-5
10 TOP
245 RATINGS & THE TRUTH ABOUT Miata
REVIEWS SELF-DRIVING TECH PICKS
2017 Annual
AUTO
SMARTER CHOICES FOR A BETTER WORLD
ISSUE
BEST&
WORST
New &
Used Cars
GREAT
VALUES
across
brands
2017
Honda
CR-V
SMALL
SUVs
THE
PERFECT
CAR?
APRIL 2017 CR.ORG
Find just what you need.
Right when you need it.
SEARCH ALL PRODUCTS A - Z
Get instant access to 7,000+ product reviews

Consumer Reports Digital is ready when you are. Wherever you are. Always
find reviews and ratings you can trust. No stressing. No second-guessing.
• Get unlimited access to reviews, ratings, and product and service

comparisons all in one place
• Check out ratings on the go with mobile access
• Take a virtual look inside our tests with exclusive 360° videos
Go to cr.org/digital now to subscribe
CRM0317C2
Contents APRIL 2017, VOL. 82 NO. 4
2017 Annual
Auto Issue
R ATI N G S A N D M O R E 40 New Car Ratings 10 Driving Into the Future

4 Why Our Car By the numbers, our Will self-driving cars ever
Testing Is Unique independent evaluations of live up to the promise of
245 brand-new vehicles. safer, simpler transport?
Rigor and independence
R ATI N G S
make our track testing tops. 17 Where the Rubber
49 Used Car Winners Meets the Road
22 10 Top Picks & Losers Take your tire tread
This year’s outstanding Which secondhand rides are seriously, for safety’s sake.
vehicles, according to most and least reliable? Plus, pick a top performer.
CR’s comprehensive and R ATI N G S R ATI N G S
stringent criteria. A B O U T T H E COV E R
52 New Car Profiles 20 Proceed With Caution
30 Best & Worst Lists The all-new 2017 Honda
Our vivid and detailed Automatic shifters are causing CR-V reflects the continuing
Which vehicles are hits and descriptions of 260 models. confusion—and crashes. evolution of the small SUV
which are misses? R ATI N G S segment. Our cover car was
R ATI N G S shot by Nigel Cox, whose
I N E V E RY I S S U E
strong signature lighting
86 New & Used Car
showcases the vehicle’s bold
36 Brand Report Card Reliability 5 From the President: angles. Learn more about the
Find out which manufac- Our reliability survey Steering You Right CR-V on page 65, and go to
CR.org/cr-v to see our “First
turers consistently make reveals which new and used We at CR continue to work
Drive.” Watch for full ratings
high-performing cars across autos go the distance—and to make sure automotive in coming months.
model lines. which lag behind. advances put safety first.
R ATI N G S R ATI N G S
6 Building a Better
38 10 Cars Worth INSIGHTS World, Together
Waiting For CR’s recent vehicle victories—
These intriguing new entries
7 The People’s Choice and new challenges for 2017.
are coming soon. SUVs are now America’s best-
selling vehicles. Here’s what 99 Selling It
39 Cars Your Way makes them worthy. Goofs and gaffes.
APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 3

2017 Annual Auto Issue
Burning Rubber insights from

We evaluate factors our car experts
including acceleration,
braking, and handling
on various courses at
our 327-acre test center
in Connecticut.
Cars with an “eco” label

aren’t always more
fuel efficient. See our
fuel-economy ratings to
know for sure.
—Jake Fisher,
director of auto testing
Why Our Car Testing Is Unique Don’t rely on blind-

spot detection in bad
weather. Snow or rain
CR’s car team drives nonstop and digs deep into data so you can can hinder its function.
make a fully informed choice on your next auto purchase. —Jennifer Stockburger,
test center director
of operations
TO REALLY PUT an automobile engineers, editors, statisti- that includes a 4,400-foot-long
through its paces, you have cians, technicians, photog- main straight, a 3,500-foot
to cover a lot of ground. Good raphers, videographers, and handling course, an accident-
thing the Consumer Reports support staff, to keep the Auto avoidance course, a 33-degree
Auto Test Center sprawls across Test Center running. rock hill, and a brake-test
327 acres in rural Connecticut, Most automotive publica- straightaway to gauge stopping
where we push the cars and tions evaluate cars and trucks distances on dry and wet pave-
trucks we test to their limits to lent to them by manufacturers. ment. To evaluate ride comfort, For added safety, make
get all of the information and But we purchase every vehicle we use surrounding public sure any pre-2012 car
insights you need to make a we test from a dealership, roads that are studded with the you buy has electronic
smart auto purchase. just like you do. (Last year type of bumps and ruts that stability control
The cars team tests about we spent $2.1 million buying drivers encounter every day. by checking our used-
60 vehicles per year, driv- cars.) That way, we can Because your safety is car ratings.
ing them a total of about maintain our independence always our fi rst priority, we —Gabe Shenhar,
900,000 miles. We also churn and test cars with the trim evaluate headlights on moon- program manager,
through reams of reliability and options people actually less nights and use carlike tar- vehicle dynamics
and satisfaction survey data buy rather than the special gets to check automatic braking
collected from our subscribers versions that manufacturers systems. We also use infotain-
to supplement the analysis, want to showcase. ment systems thoroughly and
evaluations, and ratings from Here’s something else that share our experience.
the track. It takes a full-time sets us apart: We’re thorough. In addition to testing cars,
staff of almost 30, including The staff at most publications we also operate an extensive
PHOTOS, PORTR AITS: JOHN POWERS
spends a day to a week getting child-seat program at our Auto

to know a car. We drive each ve- Test Center. For our current A pricey tire with a long
Go to CR.org/video to hicle we rate for 2,000 break-in ratings, we crash-tested 580 tread life may actually
watch car videos, which miles over several weeks before seats. Plus we’re the only be a better value than a
include Top Picks and less expensive choice.
we even start formal testing. organization that provides
WATCH “Talking Cars.” For a —Ryan Pszczolkowski,
look at how we put cars After that, we do more than independent tire ratings for
through their paces 50 tests using state-of-the-art consumers. Each year we test automotive and
at our test track, go to measurement tools. Our trained about 600 tires and rate more tire test technician
CR.org/autotest.
staffers use a test-track facility than 150 models.
4 CR.ORG APRIL 2017

From the President
President and CEO Marta L. Tellado

Senior Vice President, Brand & Strategy Leonora Wiener Steering
Editor in Chief Diane Salvatore
Executive Editor Kevin Doyle You Right
Senior Editor Jessica Branch
Design Director Matthew Lenning
FOR MORE THAN a century,
Associate Design Director Mike Smith
through countless trends,
Manager, Art Operations Sheri Geller
Art Directors Tammy Morton Fernandez, Janice Hogan, Ewelina Mrowiec,
triumphs, and innovations,
Lisa Slater, Tracy Stora, Joseph Ulatowski, Sarah Viñas the central premise of the
Photo Editors Emilie Harjes, Karen Shinbaum relationship between
Vice President, Content Gwendolyn Bounds humans and cars has always
Vice President, Publishing & Marketing Operations Brent Diamond remained the same: We are
Vice President, Chief Digital Officer Jason Fox in the driver’s seat. Should
Vice President, Consumer Policy & Mobilization Laura MacCleery
self-driving vehicles someday
Vice President, Research, Testing & Insights Liam McCormack
replace the model we’ve always
Vice President & Chief Marketing Officer Kim Miller
known, it would arguably
Director, Content Development Glenn Derene
be the most significant step off the line and onto our streets,
Senior Director, Product Testing Mark Connelly
Director, Content Impact & Corporate Outreach Jen Shecter
forward in the automotive there is so much potential to
Director, Special Projects Sandy Keenan field since the advent of the look forward to. After all, here
Deputy, Special Projects Joel Keehn internal combustion engine. at CR we’re as excited as anyone
Associate Director, Content Development Scott Billings As exciting, daunting, or about visionary products that
Cars Editors: Jeff S. Bartlett, Jonathan Linkov, Mike Monticello, unwelcome as that prospect exceed our expectations. But
Michelle Naranjo, Jeff Plungis might be for American we’ll also be keeping our eyes
Auto Test Center: Jake Fisher, Jennifer Stockburger, Directors
Product Testers: Mike Bloch, John Ibbotson, Chris Jones, Anita Lam, Tom drivers, one thing is certain: on the road ahead, riding
Mutchler, Gene Petersen, Ryan Pszczolkowski, Mike Quincy, Gabe Shenhar, Breakthroughs in autonomous alongside you to ensure that,
Shawn Sinclair, Emily A. Thomas, Joe Veselak, Seung Min “Mel” Yu
technology are opening up as new technologies shake
Electronics Jerry Beilinson, Content Lead
Editors: Tercius Bufete, Michael Gikas, Christopher Raymond, entirely new sets of questions up the auto market and stoke
Terry Sullivan, James Willcox and concerns when it comes our imaginations, they always
Product Testers: Maria Rerecich, Testing Lead; Elias Arias, Claudio Ciacci,
Charles Davidman, Richard Fisco, Dean Gallea, Richard Sulin, Maurice Wynn to keeping consumers safe live up to the standards of
Health & Food Ellen Kunes, Content Lead on the road. safety and performance that
Editors: Orly Avitzur, M.D.; Trisha Calvo; Julia Calderone; Lauren F. Friedman;
Chris Hendel; Jeneen Interlandi; Marvin M. Lipman, M.D.; Catherine Roberts;
This month, as we reveal consumers demand.
Diane Umansky our 10 top vehicle picks and
Product Testers: Maxine Siegel, Testing Lead; Amy Keating, Ellen Klosz our best and worst lists of
Health Ratings Doris Peter, Director
Best Buy Drugs Lisa Gill, Deputy
new and used cars, we’re
Editors: Teresa Carr, Ginger Skinner also bringing you up to speed
Consumer Safety and Sustainability Doris Sullivan, Henry Akinleye on the state of self-driving
Home & Appliance Eric Hagerman, Content Lead
Editors: Daniel DiClerico, Mary Farrell, Paul Hope, Kimberly Janeway
vehicles. We’re breaking
Marta L. Tellado,
Product Testers: John Galeotafiore, James Nanni, Testing Leads; Peter down the complex technology President and CEO
Anzalone, John Banta, Susan Booth, Tara Casaregola, Lawrence Ciufo,
Enrique de Paz, Bernard Deitrick, Cindy Fisher, Emilio Gonzalez, Ginny Lui,
to let you know exactly where Follow me on Twitter
Joan Muratore, Joseph Pacella, Christopher Regan, Peter Sawchuk, things stand, from astonishing @MLTellado
Frank Spinelli, David Trezza, Michael Visconti innovations on the software
Money Margot Gilman, Content Lead
Editors: Jeffrey Blyskal, Anthony Giorgianni, Nikhil Hutheesing, side to sensors that can
Lauren Lyons Cole, Donna Rosato, Tobie Stanger replicate and outperform the
Content Systems & Operations Strategy Peter Meirs, Director nuances of human sight. As
Content Operations David Fox, Director; William Breglio; Anthony Terzo autonomous features and self-
Production Eric W. Norlander; Letitia Hughes, Terri Kazin driving cars continue to roll
Imaging Francisco Collado, Mark Linder
Content Coordination Nancy Crowfoot; Diane Chesler, Aileen McCluskey
Copy Editing Leslie Monthan, Copy Chief; Noreen Browne,
Alison France, Wendy Greenfield
Fact Checking David Schipper, Manager; Kathleen Adams, Tracy Anderman,
Kevin Garnett, Sarah Goralski, Sharon Riley
Administration Decarris Bryant, Elizabeth Scotton
FOLLOW US
Consumer Engagement Testing Charu Ahuja, Director;
Linda Greene, Adam Kaplan
FACEBOOK TWITTER
Statistics Michael Saccucci, Director;
Keith Newsom-Stewart, Martin Romm, Andrew Cohen fb.com/consumerreports @consumerreports
Survey Research Steven Witten, Director; Karen Jaffe, fb.com/SomosCR @SomosCR
Simon Slater; Mei Fong, James David Gopoian, Kendra Johnson,
PHOTO: MEL ANIE DUNEA
Debra Kalensky, Martin Lachter, Olufemi Olu-Lafe, Adam Troy

YOUTUBE PINTEREST
Administration John McCowen /consumerreports /consumerreports
Consumer Insight Monica Liriano, Associate Director; Frank Yang; Chris
Holmes, Rachel Lynch, Teneisha Thomas
INSTAGRAM LINKEDIN
Newsstand Marketing Patricia McSorley, Associate Director
@consumerreports /company/
Procurement Operations Steven Schiavone, Associate Director consumer-reports
APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 5

Building a Better World, Together Join with us to make a safer,
healthier marketplace
protection from future spikes

in gas prices. Automakers are
already beating fuel-economy
standards even as they enjoy
record sales. And though new
EPA leadership may seek to
reverse the standards, CR
will continue to work hard to
protect them.
Fairness for Fraud Victims

AFTER VOLKSWAGEN WAS
exposed for intentionally
installing software to circumvent
emissions control systems,
CR vehemently called for
a settlement that ensured
that Volkswagen owners got
restitution. The final agreement
did give them the choice of
what to do with their faulty cars
while getting significant cash
compensation regardless of
their decision. We also commend
Rolling Back the Year the Justice Department for
its ongoing investigation
In 2016, Consumer Reports’ policy and mobilization experts of executives.
fought hard to help ensure that you and your loved ones But in the wake of this
settlement, the EPA accused
would be safe on the road. We campaigned for protection Fiat Chrysler of installing
similar software in 2014-2016
from faulty cars, fought for tougher tests, and championed Jeep Grand Cherokees and
stricter accountability for companies that were intentionally Dodge Ram 1500 trucks with
3.0-liter diesel engines sold
deceiving consumers. Here are highlights of our efforts and in the U.S. Consumer Reports
victories throughout this past year, as well as a review of our will be watching this troubling
case of déjà vu.
ongoing work on your behalf.
More Challenges for 2017
THE PROTECTION OF our
Making Recall Reform Real announce a plan to bolster its creating a powerful incentive personal data is now a critical
AS RECENTLY AS early 2016, New Car Assessment Program, for automakers to make the element of motor vehicle safety,
it was still legal for car-rental or NCAP, which evaluates latest lifesaving technology particularly as cars come to rely
companies to let customers new automobile designs for available on more vehicles on electronics and software-
drive off the lot in vehicles with performance against various more quickly. We commend based systems. CR submitted
open recalls. That changed on safety threats. NHTSA for hearing the comments to NHTSA as it
June 1, when the Raechel and In recent years, a high criticism and taking action, sets guidelines for car-based
Jacqueline Houck Safe Rental percentage of vehicles have and urge the agency to finalize cybersecurity.
Car Act of 2015 took effect. received four or five stars in the changes. What’s more, emerging
As part of the legislation, the NCAP five-star safety ratings. technology now allows cars to
rental cars under a safety As a result, we expressed Fuel-Efficiency Victory drive themselves or operate
recall must be repaired before concern to NHTSA that THE ANNOUNCEMENT BY the semi-autonomously. This
a customer is handed the keys. these ratings were no longer Environmental Protection technology may be promising
Consumer Reports was an meaningful to consumers and Agency (EPA) finalizing the in the long term, but in the
aggressive advocate for the encouraged the agency to make fuel-economy standards for immediate future, without
law, working with members the program more rigorous. passenger cars and trucks proper oversight, it raises
of Congress and allied safety The government’s proposed through model year 2025 serious safety concerns. And
groups to generate support. changes would be the most is a big win for consumers. new federal guidelines on
significant enhancements to With these strong, achievable automated systems are neither
Tougher Safety Scores the program since its creation targets, consumers can expect comprehensive nor mandatory.
CR WAS PLEASED to see the in 1979 and would make the a significant reduction in Turn to page 10 to read more
National Highway Traffic ratings easier for consumers fuel expenses, more choice about how CR is pushing for
Safety Administration (NHTSA) to understand, all while in fuel-efficient vehicles, and better answers.
6 CR.ORG APRIL 2017 ILLUSTRATION BY JOHN RITTER

Insights
SALES OF SMALL , MIDSIZED, AND
LARGE SUVs SURGE SK Y WARD*
MARKET SHARE ■ CAR ■ SUV
75%
60
Notable news and smart solutions 45
30
15
0
’96 ’00 ’04 ’08 ’12 ’16
The People’s
Choice
SUVs have gone from being
trucky, niche vehicles to the
nation’s favorite car. Here’s
why they’re outselling sedans.
by Mike Monticello
ILLUSTRATION BY PETER CROWTHER *Sources: Ward’s Automotive Yearbook, Automotive News Data Center. 7
Insights
SUVs ARE THE NEW KING of the road. In from electronic stability control,
2016 they outsold sedans for the very
first time, knocking that category off
a technology proven to prevent
rollovers. ESC has been required on Features That
its long-held throne and becoming the all vehicles weighing 10,000 pounds Small SUVs combine carlike road manners
best-selling segment in America. or less—which includes all passenger
Much of the credit for this ascension vehicles—since the 2012 model year,
goes to small SUVs. Car buyers greatly increasing their safety. Today’s
Generous Cargo Room
purchased more than 2 million of them SUVs are also designed to do less An SUV’s tall roofline and expansive
last year, including the Ford Escape, damage to cars in a collision. cargo opening provide more
Honda CR-V, Nissan Rogue, Subaru Myth: SUVs perform poorly. luggage space than even most
large sedans. Split-folding rear
Forester, and Toyota RAV4. Reality: Today it’s common for a seats increase flexibility.
What’s the appeal? Unlike old- small SUV to meet or even exceed the
school full-sized SUVs, which were performance of a comparably priced
built on truck platforms and usually midsized sedan. A couple of examples:
had a rough ride to match, today’s The Kia Sportage slices through our
small SUVs are built on car platforms, accident maneuver test at 52.5 mph vs.
giving them carlike road manners. the Optima’s 51.5 mph, and the Subaru
They also offer more cargo room and Forester shot to 60 mph 1.5 seconds
versatility than sedans yet are easier quicker than the Legacy yet required
to park and maneuver thanks to their 1 foot less to stop from 60 mph.
compact footprint. Other selling Myth: Cars are more comfortable
points are available all-wheel drive than SUVs.
and an elevated ride height that offers Reality: Because small SUVs are
a commanding view of the road you basically tall-roof versions of compact
won’t find in a sedan. cars, most have the ride comfort of
Here, we bust a few of the more cars and drive much like them. Our
persistent myths and offer an SUV top-rated small SUV, the Subaru
reality check. Forester, has a spacious interior, a
Myth: SUVs are gas hogs. supple ride, and secure handling. The
Reality: Small SUVs approach the fuel upscale and inviting cabin of the
economy of midsized cars. The current new Honda CR-V, which we’re testing,
Toyota RAV4 manages a respectable puts many cars to shame. Apart from
24 mpg overall. The Subaru Forester being taller, it will make you swear
Available All-Wheel Drive
does even better at 26 mpg, and the you’re in a car. It helps keep a car sure-footed in
RAV4 Hybrid gets an impressive 31 mpg. snow and on slick roads. Rare
on compact and midsized sedans,
Myth: SUVs aren’t as safe as sedans.
all-wheel drive is available on
Reality: CR has raised concerns We have ratings, full road-test
every small SUV.
reports, a buying guide, and videos
about SUV handling and safety since at CR.org/suvs.
LEARN
the 1980s, but today’s models benefit
Jeep Wagoneer Jeep Cherokee

The Evolution The first family-sized The first unibody (rather
4WD SUV, a trailblazer than body-on-frame) SUV.
of the SUV we reported on in our Progress, but it still rode
Today’s SUV has June 1963 issue. like a truck.
roots dating back to
WW II. It did plenty 1941 1963 1980 1984
of shape-shifting Willys MB AMC Eagle
before becoming the Bred for battle and Half wagon/half truck,
largest-selling used by the Army, with full-time 4WD,
automotive segment this 4WD light-utility this crossover was
in the country. vehicle started it all. way ahead of its time.
8 CR.ORG APRIL 2017 ILLUSTRATION BY T.M. DETWILER

Make a Favorite
with added utility. Here are attributes that have made them the most popular type of SUV.
Parking-Friendly Size Elevated Driving Position

Although small SUVs are often Small SUVs may be compact
a good 6 inches to 10 inches taller but they ride high and give a
than sedans, they’re the length commanding view of the road.
of a compact car, making them Tall windows offer excellent
relatively easy to squeeze into front and side views, although
tight parking spots. thick roof pillars typically
compromise rearview glances.
Increased Ground Clearance Easy Cabin Access

A taller ride height than the average You have to duck to enter sedans
car makes SUVs better at coping and climb up to get into old-school
with dirt roads and modest off-road SUVs. But the seat height and tall
trails, and provides room to manage roofline of small SUVs make them
daily challenges from curbs, potholes, easy to slide in and out of, which is
snow, and road debris. one reason they’re a hit with seniors.
Toyota RAV4 SUVs Lead Sales

This game changer They overtake sedans
ushered in the era of the for the first time ever
small car-based SUV. in the U.S., led by the
Honda CR-V.
1991 1996 1999 2016

Ford Explorer Lexus RX Toyota
Popularized the midsized The dawn of the luxury RAV4 Hybrid
SUV. “The ride is about as car-based SUV. The RX The most fuel-efficient
quiet as in most sedans,” set a new standard for non-plug-in SUV CR has
we reported in 1990. comfort and quiet. tested, at 31 mpg overall.
APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 9

Insights
Driving Into the Future

The promise of self-driving cars is that they will see better than
humans, never get lost, and almost never crash. Solving
the technical, legal, and ethical challenges to get us there is
more complicated—and fascinating—than most people
realize, and the stakes for consumer safety are quite high.
by Jeff Plungis
IN WHAT WAS ONCE an industrial-age military ground vehicle), Chimp (a And in places like Mountain View, Calif.,
foundry along the Allegheny River in robot with thumbs that can grasp Pittsburgh, and Phoenix, this is already
Pittsburgh, Carnegie Mellon University tools), and Boss (a 2007 Chevy Tahoe happening in the form of on-the-road
has created a long-standing hub for the modified to drive itself). testing. Pittsburgh was also the place
development of autonomous vehicle Some of the center’s major clients— Uber chose to launch its prototype test
technology—the National Robotics including NASA, Caterpillar, Ford fleet of self-driving taxis last year.
Engineering Center. Motor Co., John Deere, and multiple Philip Koopman is a computer and
The university’s pioneering work arms of the Defense Department— electrical engineering professor at
with the government’s Defense are underwriters of advanced Carnegie Mellon who often spots Uber’s
Advanced Research Projects Agency autonomous vehicle technology. self-driving taxis while riding a bus
dates back to 1984 and has led to the Although much of this technology downtown. These days, his job at NREC
creation of many of the vehicles that was originally intended for the is to stress-test the software that guides
occupy the facility today. battlefield, it has become increasingly the center’s self-driving car prototypes.
The building’s high bay has a crane clear in recent years that self-driving He and his team of computer wizards
capable of lifting 10 tons, and the huge cars and trucks—animated by computer throw dilemmas at the vehicles in the
open space is littered with prototypes code—will be sharing the roads with form of confounding nuggets of code.
with names like Crusher (an unmanned ordinary drivers in the near future. One day they might try to ensure a
10 CR.ORG APRIL 2017

Sights Unseen
Sensors, radar, and cameras
allow the Ford Fusion
research vehicle to scan the
environment in real time.
programmed speed limit holds steady moments of progress for the evolution that people might assume the full
in self-driving mode. On another, of machine-driven vehicles. deployment of self-driving cars is all but
they’ll corrupt map data to see how This kind of work takes time, Koopman inevitable, and near-term.
the vehicles respond. Do the cars stop says, and is important, especially Most experts consulted for this story
entirely, or crash? Or act confused? when you’re dealing with “a shiny toy tend to agree that, technologically, we are
Sometimes Koopman’s team’s that can kill people.” about 85 to 90 percent of the way to
experiments are simulated inside the perfecting the hardware, guidance sys-
enormous facility. Other times they tems, and software to make vehicles that
work around the country at their Are We There Yet? can reliably and safely drive themselves.
clients’ testing facilities, riding alongside Fully self-driving technology is at a Almost all of the fully autonomous
vehicles they are trying to befuddle. critical juncture in its development. For vehicles currently allowed on public roads
It’s a lopsided competition, for a few years now, test fleets have been are still under the direct supervision of
sure. “We’ve broken everything we’ve operating on public roads, and, for the human pilots, and they’re only driving
touched,” says Koopman. most part, those fleets have coexisted on roads that have been heavily studied
Although that sounds like bad news, fairly well with human drivers and and mapped in three dimensions.
Koopman’s crew prefers to interpret pedestrians. That alone can seem like Ford Motor Co. executive vice
the failures it causes as counterintuitive such a miracle of modern engineering president Raj Nair says you get to 90
APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 11

Insights
percent automation pretty quickly once of global strategy at General Motors, The second type of object-detecting
you understand the technology you says GM expects to see more industry sensors includes radar and lidar. They
need. “It takes a lot, lot longer to get to change over the next five years than use radio waves or light pulses to scan
96 or 97,” he says. “You have a curve, in the last 50. “We’ve solved a lot of the road ahead for potential obstacles.
and those last few percentage points the really hard problems as far as This can work in tandem with cameras,
are really difficult.” the environment we operate in,” he leveraging the strengths and weaknesses
Almost every time auto executives talk says of reaching the threshold of full of each technology. Researchers and
about the promise of self-driving cars, driving automation. “There’s not a lot automakers are still working out what
they cite the National Highway Traffic of fundamental invention that’s got combination of sensors creates the best
Safety Administration statistic that shows to go on. It’s more development and balance of capability, complexity, and cost.
human error is the “critical reason” for refinement and validation.” Human vision at night is limited,
all but 6 percent of car crashes. For all the uncertainty, there’s a reduced to whatever headlights can
But that’s kind of misleading, says good deal of agreement on the biggest illuminate. Meanwhile, some sensors,
Nair. “If you look at it in terms of fatal technical issues that still need to be such as lidar, and more traditional
accidents and miles driven, humans are solved, which boil down to three main radar, don’t need light to see, according
actually very reliable machines. We need areas: sensor technology (for “seeing” to Michael Jellen, president and chief
to create an even more reliable machine.” the road and any potential obstacles), operating officer of Velodyne LiDAR, a
Some of the gnarliest issues are mapping (for spatial orientation), leading industry supplier.
still to be solved. There are technical and software (for thinking and “Driving into the sunrise or sunset,
hurdles for the industry to overcome, problem-solving). of course, night driving—these are all
like perfecting the sensors that enable extremely tough challenges for anything
cars to “see” in all conditions. There that’s not lidar-based,” Jellen says.
are legal questions, such as whether
1
Sensor Technology Radar is adept at calculating speed and
a car company will accept liability Just like a human driver uses eyes to see distance. But it still has some limitations,
when the driver is its software. Ethical the road ahead and transfers visual data including not being able to distinguish
challenges may prove even harder. to the brain, an automated vehicle will whether an upcoming obstacle is a
Should a self-driving car swerve to have to use a combination of sensors living thing or a similarly sized rock, or
avoid a young child, risking the life of to transmit data about the nearby whether a traffic light is red or green.
its owner-occupant? And for every real- environment to its computer processors. Lidar has been perhaps the
life situation researchers like Koopman Think how much safer a human driver most exotic, costly, and important
and his team identify, there are likely would be if she had eight eyes, not two. technological piece of the self-driving
hundreds and thousands of others no Prototype vehicles today are equipped puzzle. Pulsating lasers bounce off
one has yet thought of. with bulky equipment on the roof, where surrounding objects to generate a three-
As daunting as that sounds, it’s easier for sensors to get a 360-degree dimensional map. The third dimension
there has been a lot of progress in view of the vicinity. All that gear is is key because it gives the car the depth
the technological foundation of basically a collection of two different perception we humans naturally have,
autonomous driving in the last few types of sensors. First is an array of which is necessary to avoid crashes. Lidar
years. And even more hype. So how cameras, which takes in the same type systems are accurate, but cost as much
long will it take to get from test cars to of visual information that the human eye as $7,500 per car. And they can be easily
real-world autonomous vehicles? does—only in multiple directions at the flummoxed by commonly occurring
Most industry analysts believe it will same time—then feeds that information events such as rain and snow.
take many more years—even decades— to a computer. With enough cameras, Some newer vehicles, such as the 2017
before they replace human-driven blind spots are eliminated. Narrower- Cadillac CTS, are already equipped with
cars in significant numbers. Market range cameras can clearly see distances a radio technology known as vehicle-
forecaster Moody’s projects they won’t beyond human vision. Wide-angle to-vehicle or vehicle-to-infrastructure,
be a majority of active cars before 2045. cameras offer superior peripheral vision. which lets vehicles communicate with
Still, driverless technology is one of Mobileye, a company based in Israel the infrastructure around them or
the major trends in the auto world, along that develops cameras, hardware, and directly with other cars on the road. An
with the rise of electric vehicles, the software for much of the auto industry, Audi system on some Q7 and A4 models
growth of ride sharing, and increasing is marketing systems that use eight already communicates with certain
Internet connectivity. cameras spaced around the vehicle, “smart stoplights” and tells drivers the
It seems an autos revolution is upon us. along with chips and software to seconds until a light will turn green.
Mike Ableson, the vice president process that visual data. Federal safety regulators see enormous

ways to crowdsource data so that have some autonomous driving
cars can access continuously features on the market by 2021.
What Manufacturers updated maps, and says artificial
intelligence is needed to enable
In the works are “Guardian,”
which is designed to engage
Have in Store car decision-making. only as crash-avoidance
technology, and “Chauffeur,”
Here is a look at some of the plans, actions, and promises Mercedes-Benz which would be on all the time.
from many of the auto, software, and technology Toyota unveiled an experimental
Daimler AG, the company behind
companies working to develop machine-driven vehicles prototype car, Concept-i, that
that may one day render human drivers obsolete. Mercedes-Benz luxury cars, has
agreed to produce autonomous uses artificial intelligence to
vehicles for Uber in the next few drive itself while also monitoring
years. It has declared self-driving the moods and needs of its
technology to be one of the pillars human passengers.
of its business strategy, and is
Apple in a fleet of self-driving Ford
testing one vehicle on public Uber
The company signaled its interest Fusion sedans. Ford is involved
roads in California. Uber is running an experiment
in producing an autonomous in Mcity, a simulated city in Ann
in Pittsburgh with a fleet of self-
Arbor, Mich., designed to let
Apple Car with “Project Titan” Nissan driving taxis, each equipped
around 2014. Now it’s focusing automakers evaluate and develop
Nissan’s ProPILOT system—a suite with a human driver for backup.
more on the software brain that their automated vehicles, and has
of crash-avoidance technologies Uber has hired many employees
self-driving cars need to make an R&D facility in Silicon Valley.
that allow for limited autonomous from the robotics lab at Carnegie
decisions on the road. Apple Mellon University and has
highway driving—is now in use
has reportedly postponed its acquired deCarta, a mapping
in Japan and is expected to roll
software launch date to 2021. startup, along with associated
out in Europe this year. Nissan
is adapting NASA’s Mars rover mapping assets from Microsoft.
BMW technology to create self-driving It has set no timetable for a
BMW unveiled an i8 self-driving programming called Seamless permanent rollout.
concept car last year. The Autonomous Mobility. It’s
automaker has set a 2021 goal targeting 2018 for launching
for autonomous vehicle limited self-driving capability
delivery. BMW is partnering
Google/Waymo for highway driving. Nissan
with Intel and Mobileye to plans to have 10 models with
develop more-advanced photo- In December, Waymo became
some autonomous capabilities
recognition systems. the name of the Google self-
worldwide by 2020.
driving car project. The new
company’s goal is to release fully
autonomous ride-sharing cars
Tesla
as soon as this year. It’s testing Tesla announced in October 2016 Volvo
in four cities, including its home that all cars going forward would
have all the hardware needed for The automaker is marketing
base, Mountain View, Calif. In
autonomous driving—including its autonomous efforts as
January, Waymo announced
cameras, radar, and sonar—and “IntelliSafe,” with its stated vision
advances in sensor technology
that software will be rolled out in to eliminate all fatalities related
and software.
phases. The company expects to its cars by 2020. Volvo plans
to give 100 autonomous XC90
Fiat Chrysler GM that fully self-driving Teslas will
SUVs to customers in Sweden
be possible in two to three years,
The automaker has partnered Last year GM bought Cruise and expects to introduce a self-
pending regulatory approval.
with Waymo, formerly the Automation, a technology driving car by 2021.
Google self-driving car project, startup based in San Francisco,
outfitting 100 of its Chrysler and is applying its software to Volkswagen
Pacifica minivans with self- fully autonomous Chevy Bolt
The automaker has a software
driving equipment. Waymo’s electric cars currently being
program for some semi-
test vehicles have been under tested in three states. GM’s semi-
autonomous driving features in
development in four states. autonomous “Super Cruise”
partnership with Mobileye.
Fiat Chrysler has a semi- technology will appear on some
VW says it will gradually introduce
autonomous concept car, the Cadillac models this year.
self-driving capabilities to its
Portal, aimed at millennials. fleet with advanced safety
Mobileye Toyota systems that continue to rely
Ford The company supplies cameras The automaker has invested on humans in an emergency.
Ford announced its goal of and software for much of the $1 billion in artificial intelligence Volkswagen unveiled an all-
selling robotic taxis by 2021. Ford auto industry, and is marketing labs on both coasts, and is electric, self-driving concept
is demonstrating its updated systems that use eight cameras. hiring professors from Stanford, version of its iconic bus, the
autonomous-driving technology Mobileye is concentrating on Michigan, and MIT. It aims to I.D. Buzz, earlier this year.

Insights
potential safety benefits to V2V and have scanned roads using lidar. data for 3D maps instead of doing it all
V2I technologies, and have proposed These high-definition maps have been themselves. Newer-model cars already
that all cars eventually come with V2V shown to be accurate to within a few have built-in cameras for active-safety
equipment, enabling cars to talk centimeters. They can help self-driving systems such as automatic braking and
to one another by broadcasting a stream cars navigate when conditions make it lane-change assist that are generating
of speed, acceleration, location, and difficult for sensors to see the road. And huge amounts of this kind of data.
braking information. they can assist self-driving cars in cutting Even temporary construction zones,
through the chaos while merging onto a potholes, and sinkholes could be
highway entrance ramp, joining a traffic identified and marked very quickly with
2
Mapping circle, or traversing a bridge. crowdsourcing of real-time conditions,
Right now, GPS systems can pinpoint Ford’s test vehicles, for example, says Jim Zizelman, a vice president for
locations of phones and cars to within scan every road they drive to pinpoint electronics and safety at Delphi, an
about 2 meters roughly 95 percent of the locations of trees, fire hydrants, automotive and technology company.
time. That’s accurate enough to navigate buildings, stop signs, and traffic lights— This is one reason companies like Tesla
in traffic, but not good enough to let the anything within 200 meters of the are willing to roll out cars equipped with
car drive on its own. moving car. Once roads—and larger autonomous-vehicle hardware before
That’s why researchers and carmakers areas such as towns and cities—are fully having corresponding software written.
are embarking on a massive endeavor mapped, cars will know whether a By using the cars’ cameras to record data
to create high-definition 3D maps of the crosswalk exists even when painted lines about accidents and near misses, Tesla
nation’s roads. Some of this mapping is are worn thin or covered by snow. says it can evolve and validate self-driving
already under way in cities where self- Some companies have begun technology before activating it.
driving fleets and research vehicles crowdsourcing the job of gathering Other companies like Mobileye are
planning a similar effort to gather data
from the nearly 14 million newer-model
cars already using their sensors for other
From Human to Machine semi-autonomous features.
The levels of automation have been established by automotive engineers One of the challenges of 3D maps
and federal auto safety regulators. Here’s what they mean. using lidar is that they’ll need storage
and processing powers well beyond
what could fit in a car today. The crowd-
LEVEL 1 Autopilot and similar systems routes or areas. The human
sourced maps would transmit data
Driver from Mercedes-Benz, BMW, driver does not need to
and Volvo are good examples pay attention until the car asks 100,000 times faster than the 3D maps
Assistance of partial automation. him to. The car is expected using lidar, says Zizelman, and they’ll
This describes many of to have backup systems so
be continually updated.
today’s new cars. The human LEVEL 3 that if one technology fails, it
driver is responsible for the will still be operational. If the
safety and operation at all Conditional car determines it’s not safe
times, but the car can take Automation to continue, it will pull over
3
Software
over at least one vital function: and shut down. Automakers
The car can drive itself, but Today’s self-driving cars are sometimes
steering or speed control. predict this type of car will
the human driver must still pay described like teenagers: relatively safe in
Adaptive cruise control is become available, probably
attention and take over at any
the best example of existing
time. The car is supposed to as part of ride-sharing or taxi limited situations, not nearly as safe as an
technology at this level. fleets, in the next few years. experienced human driver.
notify its driver if intervention
is needed. This may be the Programming cars to make them safe
LEVEL 2 most difficult level to manage LEVEL 5
enough to be let loose on busy roads
Partial because experiments have
shown people tend to put too
Full Automation requires painstaking programming of
Automation much trust in the technology The car controls itself under real-life situations, machine learning,
Today’s more advanced cars and stop paying attention. all circumstances, in all the and artificial intelligence so that they
qualify as Level 2. The driver places a human could drive,
can recognize what’s happening in every
is still responsible for the LEVEL 4
with no expectation of human
safe operation of the vehicle, intervention. These cars won’t conceivable circumstance. They have
but it can take over steering,
High Automation need steering wheels, brake to process their environment and make
braking, and acceleration Here, the human driver pedals, or accelerators. This safe decisions even about things they’re
under certain conditions. has handed over control to level would open up vast
encountering for the first time.
The driver is expected to do the computer driver under opportunities for people who
everything else and monitor certain situations, such can’t drive today, such as the There are essentially two ways to
road conditions. Tesla’s as highway driving or set blind, the disabled, and kids. train a vehicle to anticipate the
Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and SAE International.

How Safe Is Safe Enough?
Manufacturers are pursuing their own distinct strategies for self-driving cars; meanwhile, who’s looking out for consumers?
WHEN IT COMES to autonomous year. “But we expect machines to

vehicles, the fundamental be much better than us.”
question the auto industry The fatal crash last May
is asking and government involving a Tesla Model S owner
regulators and safety advocates using “Autopilot” mode was a
are now mulling is this: “How safe wake-up call for the industry and
is safe enough?” regulators. The National Highway
But there’s a bit of a strategy Traffic Safety Administration’s
battle going on among automakers (NHTSA) investigation into the
and the wide range of approaches incident said it did not find any
they’re taking to develop and safety defect at the time.
introduce these new technologies. It was the first death involving
Tesla is rolling out autonomous a car with Tesla’s Autopilot
Street Smarts
features to its cars incrementally engaged. Tesla contends neither
Waymo’s fleet of
when the company decides the driver nor the car could driverless cars has
they’re road-ready. To do distinguish or respond to a white been tested on
otherwise, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tractor-trailer crossing the road more than 2 million
says, would result in more overall up ahead, against a bright sky. miles of roads.
driving fatalities. Tesla’s Autopilot and similar
“It would be morally wrong systems—including those by
to withhold functionalities that Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Volvo
improve safety simply in order to —are considered early steps the car controls both speed and The Future of Safety
avoid criticisms or for fear of being toward automation. But even steering, it’s unreasonable to So far, the industry reaction to
involved in lawsuits,” Musk says. these modest steps can be safety assume the driver will be alert the guidelines has been positive.
Then there’s the company risks if drivers aren’t aware of their enough to take over again in a And during her confirmation
Waymo, formerly the Google car’s capabilities and limitations. moment’s notice.” hearing, Transportation Secretary
self-driving car project, which is Early levels of automation rely Consumer Reports supports any Elaine Chao hinted at the new
abiding by a more conservative on drivers to take over control in new technology that advances the administration’s approach, saying
premise that self-driving cars an emergency. Some automakers, needs and interests of consumers, she sees the government’s
shouldn’t be sold until human like Tesla, Nissan, and Audi, but at CR, we’re always going to role as “a catalyst for safe,
action isn’t required at all. consider human drivers their make safety our priority. efficient technologies, not as
Other companies actively backup-safety system. Their logic: Waymo is focused on creating an impediment.”
developing self-driving vehicles If humans can be relied upon to self-driving cars without pedals or Finally, there are differences of
or technology (see page 13) fall take over, then the technology steering wheels—or human drivers opinion about how much testing
somewhere in the middle of can be rolled out incrementally as backup. Its cars are expected is needed. Philip Koopman,
those two approaches. and doesn’t have to be perfect to have enough safety technology associate professor of electrical
They’re all trying to answer the right away. that a sensor failure won’t bring and computer engineering at
basic questions that need to be them to a grinding stop. The Carnegie Mellon University, says
worked out for the technology to Clarity for Consumers downside is it will take longer to there’s so much uncertainty
develop: Is it okay to use human Consumer Reports believes perfect and bring to market. around the technology that you
drivers as test subjects? How do automakers are sending a mixed NHTSA’s approach to regulating might need close to a billion miles
humans react when a self-driving message by rolling out these this area of innovation has been of test-driving data to ensure
system fails? And would delaying systems in a way that makes to stay out of the way as much as safety on roads populated with
an imperfect system that is, on drivers falsely believe they can possible. Automakers say they both human and machine-driven
average, better than a human take their hands off the wheel welcome some basic federal cars. Koopman also says he
driver but not fully tested result in despite warnings to do the ground rules so states don’t come worries the industry is seriously
more or fewer deaths on roads? opposite. We don’t think humans up with their own laws. underestimating how hard it will
There’s no way we as a society should be used as test subjects. NHTSA unveiled a voluntary be to build innate safety features
would accept self-driving cars Automakers need to do a better set of 15 safety measures in into artificially intelligent cars.
that cause the same number of job at communicating system September that it would like any “There’s a possibility at least
fatalities as humans, says Gill capabilities and limitations. company bringing a self-driving some companies are just going
Pratt, CEO of the Toyota Research As Jake Fisher, director of auto car to market to address, such as to put the technology out there
Institute, referring to the roughly testing at CR, explains, “It’s very how and in what circumstances and roll the dice,” Koopman
35,000 traffic deaths in the U.S. easy to get distracted when you the vehicle drives itself, how says. “My fear is this will really
in 2015. “Society tolerates a lot of are no longer directly responsible it was tested, and how it was happen, and it will be bad
human error,” Pratt said earlier this for driving the car. And when engineered to be safe. technology.” — J.P.

Insights
unexpected: Program in every possible

eventuality, or teach a vehicle to learn Where the Driverless Cars Are
and think for itself. Here are some of the states where automated prototype cars are already
The system has to be one that sees being tested on roads, usually with humans at the ready as backup.
pedestrians, bicyclists, and lanes and
understands driver behavior, says
Ford’s Nair. “It’s not just recognizing WAYMO FORD FORD
(Google)
GM GM
there’s a vehicle in front of it,” he says,
WAYMO
explaining that it learns through driving (Google)
UBER
experience, like people do.
WA
A lot of the progress has come via
analysis of test cars on actual roads and
MI
in programmed simulations of road PA
BMW
driving. Programmers have worked out
BOSCH
a lot of the basics of ordinary driving. *CA
DELPHI
AZ UBER
The trick is getting those rare FORD
WAYMO
situations, ones that might occur only (Google) TX
once in a lifetime, written into code. GM
Researchers scan for weird incidents MERCEDES-
BENZ
among the millions of test-car miles. NISSAN * The California Department of Motor
Vehicles reports that 21 companies have WAYMO
This has yielded oddities, such as the TESLA obtained permits to test autonomous (Google)
vehicles on public roads there.
Google car that stopped cold while a
woman in an electric wheelchair did
circles in the road ahead. She was
chasing a duck with a broom. The poor sharing the road with unpredictable Ford hopes to use its partnership
car had never seen anything like it. human drivers for decades, at least. with Nirenberg to bring humanlike
Ford’s test fleet of self-driving Fusion That’s where Waymo, a new company intelligence to driverless cars.
sedans are all learning from each other that was formerly Google’s self-driving Nirenberg says she figured out that the
at the same time, Nair says. When one car project, believes it has an edge. human eye transmits to the brain only
vehicle encounters a situation and a With deep roots in software, it has what it needs to know. The key to the
software engineer figures out a solution, experimented with machine learning artificial intelligence she’s developing is
it is then learned by every other self- in projects like Google Translate and how to be just as effective working with a
driving car Ford owns, he says. Google Photos. “To navigate city much smaller amount of data.
It’s a daunting task imagining and streets, we’ve had to train our software Evolution built that editing process over
writing all that code, then testing it in labs to be able to understand and predict millions of years, Nirenberg told CR. “I
and on roads. “We’re trying to replicate how drivers and other users of the figured out what evolution did and turned
your brain,” Nair says. The auto industry road will behave,” says Johnny Luu, it into equations.” It’s nearly impossible
seems unfazed that the human brain, a spokesman for Waymo. to map all circumstances in all weather
which works so well to process data it Ford’s recent partnership with a small conditions, she says. Humans didn’t evolve
absorbs, evolved over millions of years. visual-software company echoes the with highly detailed maps in their heads.
It won’t take anywhere near that long to industry’s growing interest in artificial We can function in places we’ve never
get a functional computer brain for self- intelligence. Nirenberg Neuroscience, been before because our brains focus only
driving cars, Nair says, because engineers a New York-based company founded by on what they need to know at the moment.
will rely on experimenting and testing, Weill Cornell Medical College professor Likewise, cars must be able to respond
and not random genetic mutation. Sheila Nirenberg, has developed to something on the fly, to handle the
“Mother Nature, as good as she is, software meant to mimic the code unexpected, she says.“You want the
does a lot of work by accident,” Nair transmitted from the human eye to the flexibility to be like we are; you don’t
says. “If something doesn’t work, we brain. Nirenberg’s research is already have to know everything.”
can make a design change right away.” helping robots recognize objects, read
The challenge might be easier if self- faces, and navigate complex situations.
driving cars only had to worry about Her company has also developed a For our ongoing coverage of self-
driving technology, including articles,
other predictable self-driving cars. “bionic eye” to restore sight to patients videos, and car safety ratings, go to
But that won’t be the case. They’ll be with degenerative retinal diseases. LEARN CR.org/selfdriving.

From top:
For Long
Tread Life
MICHELIN
DEFENDER
$120
0
70
OVERALL
SCORE
For Excellent
Rolling
Resistance
CONTINENTAL
TRUECONTACT
$106
0
68
OVERALL
SCORE
For Low
Ownership
Costs
GENERAL
ALTIMAX RT43
$91
0
66
OVERALL
SCORE
Where the
Rubber Meets
the Road
Nine percent of car, SUV,
truck, and van crashes are
caused by tires that aren’t
up to snuff. Here’s how to
determine whether the ones
on your car need to be
replaced—before they fail.
by Jon Linkov
PHOTO: JOHN POWERS

Insights
YOU’RE DRIVING AT 65 mph with the and how resistant they are to rolling,
kids in the back and the rain pouring which affects fuel mileage.
down when a deer dashes across the
Tire Value: We also evaluate tread life—by
highway. You nail the brakes and ... Why Type Matters driving thousands of miles on a road
what happens next may hinge on how course in western Texas—and use that
worn your tires are. And now isn’t the information, along with the price we
EACH TIRE TYPE has strengths
time to realize you need new ones. and limitations.
paid for the tire, to estimate the cost
Too many drivers don’t think about All-season tires are made to per 100 miles.
their tires until they have to swerve perform well in a wide range of The cheapest tire isn’t always the
or brake suddenly, or they have a flat— conditions and achieve a long best value. A significant factor in
often with serious consequences. tread life. getting a good idea of the true cost
Performance all-season tires
About 9 percent of vehicle crashes are over a tire’s life span is how long it
tend to grip better and provide
tire-related, according to estimates better handling—but sometimes will last before wearing out.
from a study by the National Highway at the expense of longevity.
Traffic Safety Administration. But UHP all-season and UHP Be an Informed Buyer
many could be prevented just with summer tires deliver the Before you start shopping, it’s good
ultimate in road holding but
proper tire maintenance. to know some tire basics.
have an even shorter tread life.
So it’s important to inspect your The general rule is that For one, tires carry a speed rating,
tires every month for wear. To gauge higher-performance tires cost usually from S (112 mph) to Y (186 mph),
tread depth, all you need is a quarter. more and wear faster, leading with some winter tires having a
Put George Washington’s head into to a greater cost per mile, as lower speed rating. That indicates
shown below.
one of the big grooves. If the top the tire’s maximum speed when
But it’s usually best to stick
of his head is flush with the tread, with the type of tire that came
carrying a load. Higher speed-rated
you have about 4/32 inch of tread left, on your car when you bought tires tend to have better grip and
meaning you have some grip remaining it. Downgrading to another tire handling but wear out sooner, generally
for rainy or snowy conditions. That’s type to save money could hurt making them more expensive. (See
the time when you should start your car’s braking and handling “Tire Value: Why Type Matters,”
performance. The figures below
shopping for new tires. If you can at left.)
are averages for the category,
see space above Washington’s head, which includes all tested tires, Tires come in a variety of sizes, so
you may need to replace your not just those on the facing page. it’s important that you get the right
tires immediately. one for your car.
There are lots of good tire choices, On the side of each tire are numbers
WEAR COSTS
but the right one depends on your PER 100 MILES like this: 215/60R16. The 215 refers to
car, where you live, and your driving FOR DIFFERENT the width of the tread in millimeters;
TIRE TYPES
needs and style. 60 is the ratio of sidewall height to tire
width; and 16 is the size of the wheel
The CR Testing Difference in inches. Most cars also list this on
Consumer Reports tests more the driver’s doorjamb.
than 50 tire models every year— Online retailers usually offer some
for cars, SUVs, and trucks—putting of the lowest prices. But you may have
them through their paces in up to to pay for shipping the tires to you,
14 tests, mostly on our test track plus installation and balancing costs.
in Connecticut. Local car dealers and tire retailers
Some of these tests tell us how well may match those prices or give you
tires grip, brake, and handle; how a deal on installation. Keep an eye
Performance All-Season
they perform on snowy or wet roads; out for promotions, too, including
manufacturer rebates and sales.
Last, note that price varies by size
UHP All-Season
UHP Summer
For full ratings on all tested tires, a as much as by brand and model.
All-Season
26 CENTS
18 CENTS
41 CENTS
14 CENTS
buying guide, and videos on all that

you need to know about tires, go to
Expect to pay more for larger tires.
LEARN CR.org/tires. To get started, check the ratings
on the facing page, where we identify
the top performers from our tests.

Ratings Tops in Tires These are the highest-scoring models 1 2 3 4 5 !
from our tests of 87 tires. WORSE BETTER RECOMMENDED
Overall Three-Season Winter

Brand & Model Price Driving Comfort Ownership Factors
Score Driving
100 Miles (Cents)

Tread Life (Miles)
Recommended
Snow Traction
Hydroplaning
Wet Braking
Dry Braking
Ice Braking
Resistance
Handling
Cost Per
Rolling
Noise
Rank
Ride
ALL-SEASON TIRES
!
0 1 Michelin Defender $120 70 0
4 0
3 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
3 0
3 0
5 0
4 90,000 13
!
0 2 Continental TrueContact $106 68 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 60,000 18
!
0 3 General Altimax RT43 $91 66 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 65,000 14
!
0 4 Pirelli P4 Four Seasons Plus $100 66 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 100,000 10
5 Nexen Aria AH7 $119 64 4

0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 75,000 16
PERFORMANCE ALL-SEASON TIRES (H-RATED: 130 MPH)
!
0 1 Continental PureContact $113 70 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
2 0
4 0
4 0
4 55,000 21
!
0 2 Pirelli Cinturato P7 All Season Plus $106 70 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 5 70,000 15
!
0 3 Michelin Premier A/S $136 70 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 85,000 16
4 Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max $98 68 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 60,000 16
5 General Altimax RT43 $92 68 4

0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 65,000 14
PERFORMANCE ALL-SEASON TIRES (V-RATED: 149 MPH)
!
0 1 Continental PureContact $111 70 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
2 0
4 0
4 0
4 55,000 20
!
0 2 Michelin Premier A/S $141 70 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 80,000 18
!
0 3 Pirelli Cinturato P7 All Season Plus $110 70 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 65,000 17
4 General Altimax RT43 $94 68 4

0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 55,000 17
5 Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season $116 64 4

0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 70,000 17
UHP ALL-SEASON
!
0 1 Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ $152 78 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
4 0
3 0
3 0
3 0
4 0
2 55,000 28
!
0 2 Pirelli P Zero All Season Plus $126 76 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 50,000 25
!
0 3 Continental ExtremeContact DWS06 $141 76 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 45,000 31
!
0 4 BFGoodrich g-Force Comp-2 A/S $116 74 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 60,000 19
5 Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season $144 72 4

0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 70,000 21
UHP SUMMER
!
0 1 Michelin Pilot Super Sport $167 82 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 NA NA
0
2 0
4 0
1 40,000 42
!
0 2 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 $177 80 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 NA NA
3
0 4
0 3
0 35,000 51
!
0 3 Nokian zLine $129 80 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 NA NA
3
0 4
0 3
0 35,000 37
!
0 4 Yokohama Advan Sport V105 $225 78 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 NA NA
2
0 4
0 1
0 35,000 64
!
0 5 Pirelli P Zero $114 78 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 NA NA
2
0 2
0 1
0 35,000 33
Online subscribers can go to CR.org for complete up-to-date ratings.
HOW WE TEST: Price is what we paid Handling for many tires combines denotes a tire’s ability to resist roads. Rolling Resistance, as
per tire in the tested size. Overall how well a tire did in wet and dry skimming along the surface of measured on a dynamometer,
Score is based on up to 14 tests, cornering grip, steering feel, and standing water. Snow Traction tests is a factor in fuel economy. Tread
with braking, handling, and hydro- an emergency handling maneuver. denote how far a vehicle has to travel Life indicates wear potential from
planing resistance more heavily For UHP tires, handling includes to accelerate from 5 to 20 mph on our 16,000-mile mixed-vehicle
weighted for most tires. Braking dry-cornering grip, avoidance- flat, moderately packed snow. Ride driving test. Cost Per 100 Miles is
tests on ice are from 10 mph; on dry maneuver performance, and sub- Comfort and Noise are evaluated the price of the tire divided by its
and wet pavement, from 60 mph. jective steering feel. Hydroplaning subjectively, on rough and smooth tread-life miles.

Insights
Proceed With Caution

Automatic shifters used to be familiar, intuitive, and
generally safe. Now that carmakers are striving
for stylistic differences, the results are sometimes
confusing and potentially dangerous.
MANY NEW-CAR BUYERS over the past have introduced new takes on the vehicle does not automatically return to
few years have probably been surprised conventional PRNDL shifter in more Park or engage the parking brake when
to find a dial or a row of buttons where mainstream cars. the engine is shut off, or when the driver’s
they expected to find the automatic Some cars have built-in safeguards to door is opened with the engine running.
transmission lever. Some cars have prevent rollaways. But other vehicles Some vehicles, from manufacturers such
shifters that look—at first glance—like have needed fixes to their transmissions as Ford and Honda, already employ both
familiar gear selectors in the center after problems surfaced in the field. In of these fail-safes.
console or on the steering column, April 2016, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles While more than 50 vehicles are
but which function in complicated or (FCA) had to recall 1.1 million vehicles affected, Consumer Reports is no longer
counterintuitive ways. after 41 people were reported injured. recommending the following cars
The result is that one of the most In June of that year, actor Anton because their specific deductions from
fundamental systems in a car can end Yelchin was killed when his Jeep Grand among our criteria drop their Overall
up being confusing to drivers, and, Cherokee rolled into him. Score below our threshold: the Chrysler
if used improperly, dangerous. Since Consumer Reports believes so 300, Lexus CT 200h, and the Mercedes-
it’s not always immediately obvious strongly that these types of shifters Benz E-Class and GLE.
whether these unfamiliar transmissions have the potential for harm that we are We reached out to those automakers
are in gear, Neutral, or Park, it’s possible now deducting points from the Overall for a response. Chrysler told us it plans
for rollaways to happen after a driver Score of any vehicle we determine has changes in the design of the shifter
exits the car. a shifter that is difficult to operate or function in the Chrysler 300 that will
BMW began to deploy unusual that can be confused for other controls. address the issues we raised. Neither
shifter designs in the early 2000s. We are also now deducting additional Mercedes-Benz nor Lexus indicated any
Since then, many other manufacturers points from the Overall Score if a tested plans to change its vehicles. Both
companies point to safeguards they do
employ, such as audible and visual alerts.
“If done right, new shifter designs
The Right can actually result in safer cars,” says
Way Forward CR’s director of auto testing, Jake
Fisher. “CR encourages innovations
in design and engineering, but safety
The 2017 Ford Fusion’s rotary shifter needs to be a priority.”
represents an innovation that actually
improves safety. Ford’s system is easy to
use and will automatically return to
Park if the engine is shut off or the door is For a full listing of the vehicles
with confusing or dangerous
opened while the engine is running.
shifters, go to CR.org/carsafety.
LEARN

A Daunting Dozen
A sampling of shifters that may leave you dazed and confused
W H AT ’ S
P RO B L E M ATI C
Can be
confusing
to use.
Acura TLX Cadillac XT5 Lincoln Continental
W H AT ’ S
P RO B L E M ATI C
Lack automatic
rollaway
preventions
when the
driver exits
or tries to
shut down
the vehicle.
Chrysler Pacifica Chrysler 300 Jaguar XF
W H AT ’ S
P RO B L E M ATI C
Lack automatic
rollaway
preventions
when the
driver exits
or tries to
shut down
the vehicle,
and can
be confusing
to use.
Audi A4 BMW i3 BMW 3 Series
Nissan Leaf Mercedes-Benz GLC Toyota Prius

10 Top
Picks
The best new cars of 2017
are outstanding all-around
performers—shown to be
reliable, safe, and satisfying.
That means they have scored
high in our stringent track
tests and extensive owner
surveys. They have won our
admiration, and we recommend
them with confidence.
by Jeff S. Bartlett
WHAT IT TAKES TO BE TOPS
Overall score To be a Top Pick, a Road Test Performance for each Reliability We predict how trouble- Owner Satisfaction Simply put,
model has to have an exemplary car is rated based on more than free new cars will be based on a good car should make its owner
Overall Score in its category. This 50 evaluations conducted at our actual problems reported by happy. We rate owner satisfaction
single number consolidates the 327-acre Auto Test Center, ranging subscribers in our 2016 auto based on the percentage of
findings from four key pillars: from instrumented track tests to survey on more than half a million surveyed owners who say that
road-test performance, predicted assessments of comfort and vehicles. Predictions for new or if they had to do it all over again,
reliability, owner satisfaction, convenience while in daily use by redesigned models depend on they would definitely buy the same
and safety. A car that bests the our staff. the manufacturer’s track record car. Our latest subscriber survey
competition by these measures or previous generations. collected data on more than
is truly extraordinary. 300,000 vehicles from model
years 2014 and later.
22 CR.ORG
Sports Car
Mazda MX-5 Miata
PRICE AS TESTED $29,905 OVERALL MPG 34
0 0
80 ROAD TEST
79
OVERALL
4 RELIABILITY
0
SCORE 5 OWNER SATISFACTION
0
The Mazda MX-5 Miata is the

embodiment of driving pleasure.
Its alchemical formula has been
honed since 1990, with the core
ingredients consistently being a
pliant four-cylinder engine, rear-
wheel drive, sharp handling,
and light weight. The real magic
is in how the machine responds
to the driver. The modest power
is harnessed to great effect with a
slick-shifting manual transmission
with closely spaced gear ratios.
The Miata truly comes alive on
winding roads, with immediate
steering response and a handling
balance that will make you grin.
On top of all that, it gets impressive
fuel economy. Fantastically fun and
frugal, the Miata is spellbinding.
Safety All cars recommended by

Consumer Reports must perform
satisfactorily in accident-avoidance
tests at our track and provide effective
occupant protection based on crash
tests conducted by the government
and/or insurance industry (if tested). See the Top Picks in action
We give credit to models that have at CR.org/toppicks and
standard forward-collision warning learn more about them
(FCW) systems or automatic WATCH in extended-length road
emergency braking (AEB) systems. tests, available to online
subscribers.
APRIL 2017 23
Large Sedan
Chevrolet Impala
0 0
91 ROAD TEST
84
3 RELIABILITY
0
OVERALL
0
The Impala continues to reign

as the leading large sedan. Slide
behind the wheel and you can
see why. Roomy, supportive seats
put you in the perfect position
to access the intuitive controls.
Despite its prodigious size, the
Impala’s handling is responsive
and secure. Road imperfections
are effectively absorbed, resulting
in a ride reminiscent of a pricier
luxury sedan. The rear seat is roomy
enough for three adults, and the
ample trunk can swallow their bags
with ease. Sedan shoppers browsing
upmarket choices would be wise to
give this smart, competitively priced
alternative serious consideration.
24 CR.ORG
1 2 3 4 5
WORSE BETTER
Compact Hybrid
The car that pioneered the hybrid complexity of its hybrid powertrain.
Toyota Prius movement and has defined fuel- It has improved even more with
efficiency for four model generations its recent redesign, reducing cabin
PRICE AS TESTED $27, 323 OVERALL MPG 52
still stands tall as an innovative green noise, improving ride comfort,
0 0
75 ROAD TEST machine. Its fuel economy in our tests and making handling more
77 was a staggering 52 mpg overall—the responsive. Sweetening the deal,
5 RELIABILITY
OVERALL highest we’ve ever recorded in a car the new Prius comes standard
SCORE 5 OWNER SATISFACTION that doesn’t plug in. Prius also touts with a comprehensive suite of
excellent reliability, a remarkable safety features. Being green has
accomplishment given the inherent never been so easy or smart.
Luxury SUV
The seven-passenger Q7 is the infotainment system provides
Audi Q7 highest-rated SUV we’ve recently seamless interaction with phone,
tested. Sumptuous and pampering, audio, and other functions. Despite
PRICE AS TESTED $68 ,695 OVERALL MPG 20
it feels more like a luxury sedan its generous size, the Q7 has
0 0
96 ROAD TEST than an SUV. The quiet interior genuine agility, with road-hugging
90 coddles riders, and it’s decked chops, a settled ride, and excellent
5
96 RELIABILITY
OVERALL out with premium trimmings and brakes for rapid stops. Sure, it’s
SCORE 5 OWNER SATISFACTION road-trip-friendly seats. The pricey, but it’s also rich in rewards.

Compact Pickup
Innovation abounds in this adventures, but this smartly
Honda Ridgeline suburbia-targeted pickup, proving designed truck more than makes
that trucks can be both refined up for that with other benefits.
and versatile. The Ridgeline glides The lockable in-bed trunk and
0 0
80 ROAD TEST along, more akin to a sedan than its dual-mode tailgate add to its
76 roughneck rivals. It also handles flexibility. Many truck buyers
3 RELIABILITY
OVERALL far better than any compact or dream of a large, rugged behemoth,
SCORE 5 OWNER SATISFACTION full-sized pickup, and it shames but the Ridgeline excels at
all nondiesel trucks for fuel the factors most noncommercial
economy. The Ridgeline isn’t up drivers with weekend warrior
for big-time towing or off-road aspirations will appreciate.
Midsized SUV
In this competitive segment, Throw in good performance, fuel
Toyota Highlander midsized SUVs have to do it all economy, and long-term reliability,
well, and none do it better than the and Highlander’s appeal is clear.
Toyota Highlander. Expectations The 2017 update sees 25 more
0
here are high, with buyers looking horsepower for the V6 engine, two
85 0
84 ROAD TEST
for family-friendly functionality, additional gears, and advanced
4 RELIABILITY all-weather traction, three-row safety equipment made standard. In
OVERALL
SCORE 4 OWNER SATISFACTION seating, generous cargo space, other words, this gem of an SUV has
and the capability of light towing. all the right moves.
26 CR.ORG
1 2 3 4 5
WORSE BETTER
Compact Car
This redesigned sedan and enough to be a budget-friendly
Chevrolet Cruze hatchback bests two segment alternative to a midsized car. The
stalwarts, the Honda Civic and the polished 153-hp turbocharged
Toyota Corolla, with an Overall Score four-cylinder engine is lively yet
0 0
77 ROAD TEST at the top of the class. The formula frugal. The Cruze we tested returned
78 is simple: Put the Malibu and Impala a good 30 mpg overall, but look
5 RELIABILITY
0
in a shrink ray, reducing scale but deeper into the data and you find
3 OWNER SATISFACTION
0
OVERALL
SCORE
preserving the commendable driving that it achieved 47 mpg on the
manners and generous available highway. Given that impressive
features. The result is a hushed, figure, it might not be worth waiting
smooth-riding sedan that’s roomy for the diesel engine.

Subcompact Car
Toyota Yaris iA
0 0
60 ROAD TEST
67
5 RELIABILITY
OVERALL
Developed by Mazda, launched by

Scion, and now marketed as a Toyota,
the Yaris iA proves that subcompact
cars can delight. A different model
from the Toyota Yaris hatchback,
the frisky iA sedan stands out in a
segment filled with insubstantial
models. It feels refined for this
entry-level class, with a smooth and
willing four-cylinder engine, slick six-
speed automatic transmission, and
relatively compliant ride. Mazda’s
sporty DNA shines through the well-
tuned steering and eager handling to
bring playfulness to this affordable
party. A full-featured infotainment
system and standard low-speed
automatic emergency braking add
further appeal, making the Yaris iA a
desirable no-excuses budget sedan.
28 CR.ORG
1 2 3 4 5
WORSE BETTER
Small SUV The Subaru Forester sets the inspires driving confidence.
Subaru Forester standard for small SUVs, combining Secure handling and a supple
relatively roomy packaging, fuel ride add to the appeal. Performance
PRICE AS TESTED $27,14 5 OVERALL MPG 26
efficiency, solid reliability, and is decent from the standard
0
easy access. Large windows and 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine,
83 0
85 ROAD TEST
a boxy shape maximize room for and fuel economy is excellent at
4 RELIABILITY passengers and gear in sharp 26 mpg overall. And last, safety
OVERALL
SCORE 4 OWNER SATISFACTION contrast to style trends exhibited technology like forward-collision
by competitors that compromise warning and automatic emergency
practicality. Big square doors aid braking is available on all but the
access, and the unmatched visibility base trim level.
Midsized Sedan
Move over Honda Accord and controls, and a roomy backseat.
Kia Optima Toyota Camry: The Kia Optima The Optima is a vehicle that delivers
rocks the midsized sedan all of these virtues in a stylish,
segment as a smart alternative value-laden package that’s filled
0 0
86 ROAD TEST to the me-too mainstream. It with features usually found on
85 checks all of the right boxes pricier cars. With outstanding
5 RELIABILITY
OVERALL for family-sedan buyers, with reliability and extensive warranty
SCORE 5 OWNER SATISFACTION responsive handling, a steady ride coverage, savvy sedan shoppers
and pleasant powertrain, short should take this recently
stopping distances, easy-to-use redesigned car for a test drive.

Best
& Worst
Lists
From road tests and fuel economy to owner
satisfaction and reliability, we consider many factors
when identifying the best vehicles. These handy
charts show you at a glance which models come out
on top, and which you should skip.
A GOOD CAR CHOICE scores high on all of the attributes

that matter, from how it drives to how safe it is, from fuel
economy to reliability. But the reality is that buyers
usually have to prioritize these attributes when making
a decision. To help you easily do this, we’ve created lists
taking into account what matters to consumers. All of
our ratings are based on deep and broad data collection
from our extensive track testing, as well as our annual
Owner Satisfaction and Reliability surveys.
This year, we’ve included some new features. We’ve
listed carmakers that offer active safety features as
standard on all trim lines rather than reserving those
features for the most expensive versions. And we’ve
added used cars—at 4-, 8-, and 12-year milestones—to our
reliability list, so you can make a convenient comparison
of older and new cars in one spot.
30 CR.ORG APRIL 2017 ILLUSTRATION BY TK

1 2 3 4 5
WORSE BETTER
Cars With Advanced Standouts From Our Road Tests,

Safety Systems as and Those That Come Up Short
Standard Features This list quickly shows you the winners and losers in our road tests.
Scores are based on ride, handling, braking, acceleration, fuel
At CR, we believe so strongly that forward- economy, quietness, interior room, and ease of use, among other factors.
collision warning and automatic emergency For full new-vehicle ratings, see page 40.
braking should be standard on every new car—
and not just on the most expensive trims—that
we give additional points to the Overall Score of
Highest Score Lowest Score Highest Score Lowest Score
models that include these features as standard
equipment. Below are the 2017 and early 2018
models that come with FCW and/or AEB on SUBCOMPACT CARS SUBCOMPACT SUVs
every trim level. Learn more at CR.org/carsafety. Honda Fit Mitsubishi Subaru Crosstrek Fiat 500X
EX Mirage ES Premium Easy
Acura Mercedes-Benz 0
67
0
29
0
74
0
50
ROAD -TEST ROAD -TEST ROAD -TEST ROAD -TEST
MDX B-Class ED SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE
RLX C-Class COMPACT CARS COMPACT SUVs

CLA
Volkswagen Golf Fiat Subaru Forester Jeep Cherokee
Audi CLS SE (1.8T) 500L* 2.5i Premium Laredo (4-cyl.)
A3
A4
E-Class
GLA
0
82
0
50
0
85
0
58
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE
A5 GLC
Allroad GLE MIDSIZED CARS MIDSIZED SUVs
Q5 GLS
Subaru Legacy Nissan Toyota Highlander Jeep Wrangler
Q7 S-Class 2.5i Premium Altima 2.5 SV Hybrid Limited Unlimited Sahara
Chevrolet Tesla
0
89
0
71
0
85 0
20
SS Model S
Model X LARGE CARS LARGE SUVs
Genesis
Chevrolet Impala Ford Taurus Dodge Toyota
G80 Toyota Premier (V6) Limited (V6) Durango GT (V6) Sequoia Limited
G90 Avalon
C-HR
0
91
0
72
0
83 0
60
Honda Corolla
Clarity Corolla iM LUXURY COMPACT CARS LUXURY COMPACT SUVs
Highlander Audi A4 Lexus IS Porsche Land Rover
Land Rover Land Cruiser Premium Plus 300 (AWD) Macan S Discovery Sport
HSE
Range Rover Mirai 0
88
0
56
0
85
0
58
Range Rover Sport Prius ROAD -TEST ROAD -TEST
SCORE SCORE ROAD -TEST ROAD -TEST
Prius C SCORE SCORE
Lexus Prius Prime LUXURY MIDSIZED/LARGE CARS
LUXURY MIDSIZED/LARGE SUVs
ES RAV4 Tesla Model S Maserati Ghibli
GS Yaris P85D* S Q4 Audi Q7 Cadillac Escalade
0 0
Premium Plus Premium
IS Yaris iA 100 71
LC ROAD -TEST ROAD -TEST 0
96
0
61
SCORE SCORE ROAD -TEST ROAD -TEST
LX Volkswagen SCORE SCORE
RX Passat SPORTY CARS

PICKUP TRUCKS
Touareg BMW Fiat 500
M235i * Abarth Ram 1500 Big Toyota Tacoma
0 0
Horn (V6, diesel) SR5 (V6)
Volvo 98 66
S60 ROAD -TEST
SCORE
ROAD -TEST
SCORE
0
82 0
46
ROAD -TEST ROAD -TEST
S90 SCORE SCORE
V60 MINIVANS
V90 Chrysler Pacifica Kia Sedona

*Powertrain has changed since last test.
Touring L EX
XC60
XC90 0
85
0
70
ROAD -TEST ROAD -TEST
SCORE SCORE

Best and Worst Fuel Economy

For buyers who put fuel costs at the top of their concerns, start with this list of the most fuel-efficient vehicles in our tests.
Below you’ll find vehicles with the highest overall mpg and, shaded in red, those with the lowest overall fuel economy for their
category. To highlight the best, we’ve selected miles-per-gallon cutoffs that are relative to each category. For example,
a vehicle that gets 21 mpg would not be a standout among compact SUVs but would be among luxury midsized or large SUVs.
Overall City Highway Overall City Highway

Make & Model Make & Model
MPG MPG MPG MPG MPG MPG
ELECTRIC CARS AND PLUG-IN HYBRIDS LUXURY COMPACT CARS
BMW i3 Giga 139* 135* 141* Lexus CT 200h Premium 40 31 47
Mitsubishi i-MiEV SE 111* 104* 116* BMW 328d xDrive 35 24 49
Ford Focus Electric 107* 108* 107* Mercedes-Benz CLA 250 28 19 39
Nissan Leaf SL 106* 86* 118* Acura ILX Premium 28 18 42
Chevrolet Volt LT 105* 99* 109* Acura TLX 2.4L 27 18 41
Audi A3 Premium 27 18 40
SUBCOMPACT CARS
Toyota Prius C Two 43 37 48 Audi A4 Premium Plus 27 18 40
Mitsubishi Mirage ES 37 28 47 Lexus IS 300 (AWD) 20 14 28
Smart ForTwo Passion 36 25 48 LUXURY MIDSIZED AND LARGE CARS
Ford Fiesta SE (3-cyl., MT) 35 25 46 Lexus ES 300h 36 28 44
Toyota Yaris iA 35 24 48 Lincoln MKZ Hybrid 34 29 38
Chevrolet Sonic sedan (1.8L) 28 19 38 Nissan Maxima Platinum 25 17 36
Lexus ES 350 25 17 35
COMPACT CARS
Toyota Prius Three 52 43 59 Infiniti Q70 Hybrid 25 17 33
Mercedes-Benz S550 (AWD) 18 12 28

Mazda3 i Touring 33 23 45
Chevrolet SS 17 12 23
Hyundai Elantra SE 33 21 49
Toyota Corolla LE Plus 32 23 43 SPORTY CARS/ROADSTERS
Volkswagen Jetta SE (1.4T) 32 21 47 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club 34 25 42
Honda Civic LX 32 21 45 Mini Cooper S 30 23 38
Mitsubishi Lancer ES 25 17 34 Toyota 86 30 23 37
Subaru BRZ Premium 30 23 37

MIDSIZED CARS
Ford Fiesta ST 29 21 36
Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid 41 33 49
Volkswagen GTI 29 20 39
Ford Fusion Hybrid SE 39 35 41
Ford Mustang GT Premium (V8) 19 13 27
Hyundai Sonata Hybrid SE 39 31 46
Toyota Camry Hybrid XLE 38 32 43
Mazda6 Sport 32 22 44
Honda Accord LX (4-cyl.) 30 21 40
Volkswagen Passat (V6) 23 16 33

CAR ICONS: T.M. DET WILER
*Miles per gallon equivalent (MPGe) when running on electricity.

Overall City Highway Overall City Highway
Make & Model Make & Model
MPG MPG MPG MPG MPG MPG
MINIVANS LUXURY COMPACT SUVs
Ford Transit Connect XLT (2.5L) 21 15 27 Lexus NX 300h 29 23 34
Toyota Sienna XLE (FWD) 21 14 27 Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 26 19 35
Chrysler Pacifica Touring-L 21 13 33 BMW X1 xDrive28i 26 17 37
Honda Odyssey EX-L 21 13 31 Infiniti QX30 Premium 25 17 32
Dodge Grand Caravan GT 17 11 27 Lexus NX 200t 24 17 33
Lincoln MKC Reserve 19 13 27

SUBCOMPACT SUVs
Honda HR-V LX 29 20 39 Porsche Macan S 19 13 26
Mazda CX-3 Touring 28 20 36 LUXURY MIDSIZED AND LARGE SUVs
Subaru Crosstrek Premium 26 19 34 Lexus RX 450h 29 24 33
Fiat 500X Easy 23 16 31 Lexus RX 350 22 14 31
Acura MDX Tech 21 14 31

COMPACT SUVs
Toyota RAV4 Hybrid XLE 31 26 36 BMW X5 xDrive35i 21 14 28
Hyundai Tucson Sport (1.6T) 26 18 35 Nissan Armada 14 10 20
Subaru Forester 2.5i Premium 26 18 35 Toyota Land Cruiser 14 10 20
Mazda CX-5 Touring (2.5L) 25 19 32 Ford Expedition Limited EL 14 10 19
Hyundai Tucson SE (2.0L) 24 17 32 PICKUPS
Toyota RAV4 XLE 24 17 32 Chevrolet Colorado LT (diesel) 24 15 34
Mitsubishi Outlander SEL (4-cyl.) 24 17 30 Ram 1500 Big Horn (diesel) 20 14 27
Nissan Rogue SV 24 17 30 Honda Ridgeline RTL 20 13 29
Jeep Cherokee (V6) 21 14 29 Toyota Tacoma SR5 (V6) 19 14 25
Chevrolet Colorado LT (V6) 18 13 26

MIDSIZED SUVs
Toyota Highlander Ram 1500 Big Horn (V8) 15 10 21

25 18 32
Hybrid Limited
Nissan Titan XD (diesel) 15 10 20
Jeep Grand Cherokee
24 17 32
Limited (diesel)
WAGONS AND HATCHBACKS
Hyundai Santa Fe Sport (2.4L) 23 17 30 Toyota Prius V Three 41 33 47
Mazda CX-9 Touring 22 15 32 Ford C-Max Hybrid SE 37 35 38
Nissan Murano SL 21 15 29 Mini Clubman Base (3-cyl.) 28 18 40
Ford Edge SEL (2.0 EcoBoost) 21 14 31 Fiat 500L Easy 27 18 37
Kia Sorento EX (V6) 21 14 30 Kia Soul Plus 26 19 33
Dodge Journey (V6) 16 11 25 Volvo V60 Cross Country 21 14 29

Best New Cars Under $30,000 Cars That Owners Say Are the
If your budget is driving your decision, have no fear. Best—and Worst—Value
You can still get solid performance, safety, fuel economy,
and reliability from the cars below. All of these We ask owners every year in our annual Satisfaction
vehicles have earned Consumer Reports’ recommendation. survey which cars won—or broke—their hearts. This year,
we also asked whether owners thought their cars
delivered value for the money. Here, we present satisfaction
with the value of their 1- to 3-year-old vehicles.
SUBCOMPACT SPORTS/SPORTY
CARS CARS
Category Best Value Worst Value

Chevrolet Sonic LT (1.8L) Mazda MX-5 Miata Club
Honda Fit EX Subaru BRZ Premium SUBCOMPACT

CARS
Toyota
Prius C 4
0 Nissan
Versa Note 3
0
Toyota Yaris iA Toyota 86
COMPACT
CARS WAGON
COMPACT
CARS
Hyundai
Elantra* 5
0
Fiat
500L* 2
0
Subaru Outback
Chevrolet Cruze LT 2.5i Premium
Kia Chevrolet
5 3
0
MIDSIZED
Ford C-Max Hybrid SE SUBCOMPACT CARS Optima* Malibu*
SUVs
Hyundai Elantra SE
Honda HR-V LX
Chevrolet Nissan
4
0 3
0
LARGE
Kia Forte LX CARS Impala Maxima*
Mazda CX-3 Touring
Kia Soul Plus Subaru Crosstrek
Premium LUXURY Buick
Infiniti
Mazda3 Touring (2.0L) COMPACT
CARS
Regal
4
0 Q50 1
0
COMPACT
SUVs
Toyota Corolla iM
LUXURY
Ford Escape SE (1.5T) Hyundai Cadillac
Toyota Corolla LE MIDSIZED/
LARGE CARS
Genesis 5
0 XTS 1
0
Hyundai Tucson SE (2.0L)
Toyota Prius Three
Mazda BMW 2
5
0 2
0
Hyundai Tucson Sport (1.6T) SPORTY
Toyota Prius V Three CARS MX-5 Miata* Series
MIDSIZED
Kia Sportage LX (2.4L)
CARS Ford Transit
Chrysler
Chevrolet Malibu 1LT (1.5T)
Mazda CX-5 Touring (2.5L) MINIVANS
Pacifica* 4
0 Connect/
Toyota Sienna
2
Nissan Rogue SV
Ford Fusion SE (1.5T)
Subaru Forester Subaru Jeep
4
0 2
0
COMPACT
2.5i Premium SUVs Forester Cherokee
Ford Fusion SE Hybrid
Toyota RAV4 XLE
Honda Accord LX (4-cyl.)
Hyundai Nissan
4
0 1
0
MIDSIZED
Hyundai Sonata MIDSIZED SUVs Santa Fe Pathfinder
SUV
Hybrid SE
Hyundai Santa Fe Sport
(4-cyl.) Ford Toyota
3
0 1
0
LARGE
SUVs Flex Sequoia
LUXURY
Infiniti
COMPACT
SUVs
QX50 3
0 BMW X1* 1
0
LUXURY
Lincoln Tesla
MIDSIZED/LARGE
SUVs
MKX* 3
0 Model X* 1
0
Nissan Ford
3
0 2
0
PICKUP
TRUCKS Frontier F-250
*Based on one model year of data.

Most and Least Reliable New and Used Vehicles
A worry-free car is a priority for many. To help in your search, we analyzed data on more than 500,000 vehicles from our Annual Auto Survey to
not only showcase new cars with the best predicted reliability (based on the three newest model years) but also to highlight 4-, 8-, and 12-year-old
models. Cars commonly come off lease after three years, so that means there are always 4-year-old used cars on the market. We spotlight those
that are the more trouble-prone over the same time periods. The eight years of reliability data by trouble spot are found in our charts on page 86.
4-Year-Old Cars 8-Year-Old Cars 12-Year-Old Cars

Category New Cars
(2013 models) (2009 models) (2005 models)
Most Least Most Least Most Least Most Least
Reliable Reliable Reliable Reliable Reliable Reliable Reliable Reliable
COMPACT/
Toyota Ford Toyota Ford Toyota Subaru Toyota Chrysler
SUBCOMPACT
Prius* Focus Corolla Fiesta Yaris Impreza Corolla PT Cruiser
CARS
MIDSIZED Kia Volkswagen Toyota Chevrolet Chevrolet Volkswagen

Mazda6 Toyota Camry
CARS Optima* Passat Camry Malibu Malibu Passat
LARGE Toyota Dodge Toyota Chrysler Toyota Chevrolet Toyota Chevrolet

CARS Avalon Charger Avalon 300 Avalon Impala Avalon Impala
LUXURY
Acura Lexus BMW
COMPACT Lexus IS Cadillac ATS Infiniti G Audi A4 Acura TSX
TLX CT 200h 3 Series
CARS
LUXURY
Mercedes-
MIDSIZED/ Infiniti Volvo
Benz Audi A6 Lincoln MKS Lexus ES Lincoln MKS Lexus ES
LARGE Q70* V70/XC70
S-Class*
CARS
SPORTY Ford Mazda Volkswagen Mazda MX-5 Mini

CARS Lexus RC* Mustang MX-5 Miata GTI Miata
Mini Cooper Ford Mustang
Cooper
Chrysler Chrysler Chrysler

Dodge Town & Town & Town &
Toyota Toyota Toyota Toyota
MINIVANS Grand Country/ Country/ Country/
Sienna Sienna Sienna Sienna
Caravan Dodge Grand Dodge Grand Dodge Grand
Caravan Caravan Caravan
Ford Escape/
SMALL Toyota Jeep Hyundai Volkswagen Mercury Subaru
Honda CR-V Honda CR-V
SUVs RAV4 Cherokee Tucson Tiguan Mariner/Mazda Forester
Tribute
MIDSIZED Toyota Jeep Grand Toyota Nissan Toyota Jeep Grand Toyota Chrysler
SUVs 4Runner Cherokee Highlander Pathfinder Highlander Cherokee Highlander Pacifica
Chevrolet Chevrolet GMC Chevrolet

Chevrolet
LARGE Ford Suburban/ Dodge Suburban/ Acadia/ Toyota Suburban/
Tahoe/
SUVs Expedition* GMC Durango GMC Saturn Sequoia GMC
GMC Yukon
Yukon XL Yukon XL Outlook Yukon XL
LUXURY Cadillac Buick Buick

Lexus GX Lexus RX Infiniti JX Lexus RX Lexus RX
SUVs Escalade Enclave Rainier
PICKUP Toyota Ram Honda Ford Honda Dodge Ram Toyota Nissan
TRUCKS Tundra 2500 Ridgeline F-350 Ridgeline 1500 Tundra Frontier
*Based on one model year of data.

Brand
Report
Card
Building one great vehicle is easy. Making a
whole portfolio of excellent ones is hard. We tell you
which manufacturers stand out.
by Jeff S. Bartlett
CONSISTENCY IS KEY. Our annual analysis reveals that some them. Brands with just one tested model were omitted.
brands exhibit high-level performance across their lines. The Overall Score is the combination of our road tests,
Many others do not. predicted reliability, owner satisfaction, and safety. For
In our 2017 brand analysis, Audi takes the top position for each brand we indicate the percentage of tested models
the second year in a row, followed by Porsche, BMW, Lexus, that earned a recommended designation. This percentage
and Subaru. Although these are the same top five as last year, reveals a meaningful differentiation. Only Porsche, BMW,
Porsche and BMW rose, and Lexus and Subaru moved down. and Mazda earned a recommendation on every model we
This year Chrysler, Acura, Infiniti, and Cadillac were the tested. Audi, Honda, and Hyundai lead the other brands,
most upwardly mobile. Chrysler rose seven places, and with 86 percent of their tested lines being recommended.
the other three brands each moved up six places compared From year to year we see movements in brand rankings
with last year. because of changes in reliability and new road tests.
Some of the standout brands benefit from a tiny roster. Subaru dropped from second to fifth place because the
Tesla, the highest-ranked American brand, earns its previously very reliable Legacy and Outback are now rated
position based on just two models. Likewise, Chrysler only average, and the WRX/STI dropped to below average.
has one of the higher average road-test scores, but that’s Similarly, Mini dropped 11 places because the unreliable
also based on just two models: the 300 and Pacifica (low Cooper and Clubman weighed down the average Overall
Overall Scores keep both from being recommended). Score. Volkswagen tumbled eight spots because its reliability
Fiat, Jeep, Mitsubishi, and Land Rover remain stubbornly slid from average last year to below average for 2017.
stuck at the bottom of the list. Finally, the rankings do not reflect corporate behavior.
To arrive at the rankings, we averaged the Overall Scores Consumer Reports continues to push for consumers to be
for new cars from every major automotive brand based on fully compensated for Audi, Porsche, Volkswagen, and other
the vehicles we have purchased and tested, then we ranked vehicles potentially affected by emissions cheating scandals.

1 0
0 2 0
3 0
4 0
5
WORSE BETTER
Top—and Bottom—of the Class

Analyzing our exclusive test and survey data across the car model lines
allows us to rank the brands and provide valuable insights into how they
compare on several key factors.
Overall Road-Test Predicted Owner % of Tested Models

Rank Brand Score Score Reliability Satisfaction Recommended
1 Audi 81 86 4
0 4
0 86
2 Porsche 78 88 0
3 0
5 100
3 BMW 77 86 3
0 4
0 100
4 Lexus 77 74 0
5 0
4 75
5 Subaru 74 81 3
0 4
0 83
6 Kia 74 77 4
0 3
0 71
7 Mazda 73 75 4
0 4
0 100
8 Tesla 73 88 2
0 5
0 50
9 Honda 72 77 3
0 4
0 86
10 Buick 72 72 4
0 3
0 67
11 Toyota 71 68 4
0 4
0 78
12 Hyundai 70 73 4
0 3
0 86
13 Acura 68 73 3
0 2
0 40
14 Volvo 68 77 2
0 3
0 40
15 Lincoln 68 80 2
0 4
0 25
16 Infiniti 67 77 3
0 2
0 17
17 Chevrolet 67 74 3
0 4
0 47
18 Cadillac 66 79 2
0 3
0 33
19 Chrysler 66 84 2
0 5
0 0
20 Mercedes-Benz 66 80 3
0 4
0 13
21 Ford 65 74 3
0 3
0 46
22 Nissan 64 69 3
0 3
0 33
23 Volkswagen 64 78 2
0 3
0 25
24 Mini 60 71 2
0 4
0 0
25 GMC 60 73 2
0 4
0 20
26 Jaguar 59 79 2
0 4
0 0
27 Dodge 56 74 2
0 3
0 0
28 Land Rover 52 71 1
0 4
0 0
29 Mitsubishi 51 46 3
0 2
0 0
30 Jeep 45 55 2
0 3
0 0
31 Fiat 41 52 1
0 2
0 0
*A brand must have at least two tested models to be included. Alfa Romeo, Genesis, Maserati, Ram, and Smart lack sufficient data. CR.ORG 37
10 Cars Worth Potent Pickup

Ford F-150
Lively Luxury
Lexus LS
The F-150’s evolution continues Longer, lower, wider, and report-
Waiting For with a styling refresh and more
advanced safety features.
edly 200 pounds lighter, the new
LS is poised to remain a top choice
The base engine is now a 282-hp, in the ultraluxury sedan segment.
We have our eye on this promising group 3.3-liter V6, and more engines The V8 has been replaced with a
in the lineup will be teamed with a twin-turbo 3.5-liter V6 producing
of new and redesigned models coming later this 10-speed automatic. Fuel-saving 415 hp, hooked to a new 10-speed
year. If you’re in the market now, keep these on automatic start/stop is standard automatic. Lexus claims a
your consideration list until we test their claims. across the range. The F-150 gains 0-60 mph time of 4.5 seconds.
automatic emergency braking The high-tech cabin features
and adaptive cruise control. a 12.3-inch infotainment screen
Going Uptown A 3.0-liter turbodiesel engine is along with a massive available
Toyota Camry coming for 2019. 24-inch color head-up display.
AVAILABLE: Fall 2017 AVAILABLE: November 2017
The top-selling midsized sedan in
the land rides on a new platform Sport Appeal
that Toyota claims is more fuel
Kia Stinger
efficient, and it rocks a sleeker,
more sophisticated look for 2018. Kia is boldly reaching for the
The 2.5-liter four-cylinder and enthusiast driver with the sleek,
Family-Friendly the 3.5-liter V6 will be paired to a low-slung 2018 Stinger hatchback.
Honda Odyssey new eight-speed automatic; as Engines include a 255-hp, 2.0-liter
The fifth-generation Odyssey before, a four-cylinder hybrid turbo four-cylinder and a twin-
packs a stronger 3.5-liter V6 with will be available. An upgraded turbo 365 hp, 3.3-liter V6, driving
Roomier Recreation the rear or all wheels through an
280 hp, paired with a nine- or interior gives the Camry a more
10-speed automatic, depending premium feel and features the Volkswagen Tiguan eight-speed automatic transmis-
on trim. The second-row outboard next generation of Toyota’s Entune The new long-wheelbase sion. The suspension and steering
seats not only slide fore and infotainment system. Tiguan has an extra 10.7 inches of will have five settings, from com-
aft but also side to side, aiding AVAILABLE: Summer 2017 length and features an available fort to hard-core performance.
AVAILABLE: December 2017
child-seat usability and rear third-row seat, a rarity among
access. A single infotainment small SUVs. Cargo space, a former
screen replaces the previous shortcoming, has been improved.
complicated dual screen. A Power comes from a 184-hp,
ceiling-mounted camera displays 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder with
on the center screen what an eight-speed automatic; AWD
the kids are up to in the back. is available. VW’s optional Digital
AVAILABLE: Spring 2017 Cockpit lets drivers reconfigure
the 12.3-inch instrument panel for
Modern Machine easy viewing of navigation and
GMC Terrain other key data. Perky Urbanite
AVAILABLE: Summer 2017 Ford EcoSport
Like its sibling, the Chevy Equinox,
the Terrain now squarely fits in the The Fiesta-based EcoSport is
Well-Mannered Mover
small SUV class rather than half tasked with bringing driving zest
Chevrolet Traverse to the expanding subcompact
a size up. The Terrain brings an
advanced infotainment system and Even though the previous model SUV segment. Ford’s smallest-
many safety features. In an effort was commodious, the Traverse ever SUV has a choice of a turbo
Bite-Sized Beauty has become roomier for 2018,
to improve fuel economy, GMC 1.0-liter three-cylinder or a 2.0-
Nissan Rogue Sport offers a choice of two four-cylinder devoting more space to the liter four-cylinder, both paired with
The Rogue Sport is 1 foot shorter turbos plus a diesel, ditching the second and third rows and more a six-speed automatic; the 2.0-liter
than the Rogue small SUV but previous V6. The gas engines will cargo room behind the raised third comes standard with AWD. The
larger than the whimsical Juke. All be coupled with a nine-speed auto- row. Power comes from a 2.0-liter EcoSport’s awkward side-hinged
Rogue Sports come with a 141-hp, matic; the diesel gets a six-speed. four-cylinder turbo or a 3.6-liter tailgate reflects considerations in
2.0-liter four-cylinder mated to a AVAILABLE: Summer 2017 V6, each paired with a new nine- other markets; it’s already on sale
continuously variable transmission speed automatic. The V6 will elsewhere in the world.
driving either the front or all produce an estimated 305 hp with AVAILABLE: Spring 2018
wheels. Available features include a claimed 3-mpg improvement in

the NissanConnect navigation/app highway fuel economy.
system with a 7-inch screen and a AVAILABLE: Fall 2017
360-degree-view camera system.

AVAILABLE: Spring 2017

Cars
New Car
Ratings
pg. 40
Used Car
Winners &
Losers pg. 49
Your New Car

Profiles
pg. 52
New &
Way
Used Car
Reliability
pg. 86
WE’RE AT YOUR SERVICE . Buying a car should be easy and Road-Test Score, Reliability and Satisfaction survey results,
rational and make you feel as in control as you’d be at the overall fuel economy, and more. Our New Car Profiles cover
wheel of a terrific car. But car-dealer come-ons and a raft 260 cars, SUVs, trucks, and vans currently on sale. Each
of biased, incomplete info flooding the internet can make profile contains our expert review, the Overall Score for
the process nerve-wracking and even risky. tested vehicles, and key data from our testing and surveys.
So take a deep breath and relax, because in these sections Used Car Winners & Losers is a curated list of the most
we do what we do best: deliver authoritative, comprehensive, reliable and affordable vehicles from $5,000 to $30,000.
unbiased data based on consumer-relevant measures and We’re the only place you’ll find an unapologetic list of the
unparalleled testing, so you can choose a car with confidence. unreliable vehicles you should stay far away from.
Our New Car ratings provide a handy reference to all And last, turn to our reliability charts for new and used
of the vehicles Consumer Reports has recently tested. cars to see what might go wrong—and when—with the model
At a glance you can see how each model matches up with you currently own as well as how trouble-prone your next
its competitors in key areas including Overall Score, car, SUV, or truck might be.
ILLUSTRATIONS BY PATRICK HRUBY APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 39

New
Car
Ratings
Nowhere else will you find such comprehensive,
independent ratings of 245 new cars. All ratings are
based on the proprietary performance and fuel-
economy tests gathered at our world-class test track,
along with extensive subscriber surveys and
government and insurance-industry safety data.
Don’t buy a new car without them.
HOW TO READ Recommended Vehicles did well in they would definitely buy the same most relevant to each vehicle category.
THE RATINGS CHARTS testing, have average or better pre- car again. The information is drawn We buy and test about 60 vehicles
dicted reliability, and performed ad- from feedback on more than each year, driving them for thousands
Overall Score reflects a vehicle’s equately if included in crash tests. A 300,000 vehicles less than 3 years of miles and putting them through
performance in our road tests, results model that scores Poor in the Insur- old. Partial or limited data may be more than 50 tests. Some tests, such
from our Reliability and Owner ance Institute for Highway Safety nar- used for either survey if the car is as those for braking and fuel economy,
Satisfaction surveys, the availability of row-offset crash test can’t be new or redesigned, or if we have are empirical and measured with
a frontal crash prevention system, recommended. insufficient survey responses. instruments; those for seat comfort
and, if applicable, results from crash Survey Results reflect findings of Safety identifies whether a vehicle and agility are graded by our experts.
tests by government and insurance- annual Reliability and Owner has one or more frontal crash The energy consumption of electric
industry agencies. We now deduct Satisfaction surveys taken by prevention systems, such as forward- vehicles is expressed in a miles-per-
points if a vehicle’s shifter lacks fail- Consumer Reports subscribers. collision warning and automatic gallon equivalent rating (MPGe). Energy
safes, is difficult to operate, and/or Predicted Reliability is based emergency braking. NA means no consumption for plug-in hybrids is
can be confused with other controls. on about 500,000 vehicles owned by such system is offered. Opt. means listed in both electric and gas modes.
(See “Proceed With Caution,” starting subscribers who reported problems it’s available on some versions but not
on page 20.) with their vehicles in our 2016 Annual necessarily on the one we tested. WE RATE CARS USING
Make, Model & Trim reflect the Auto Survey. It covers a model’s latest Models with standard systems are THESE SYMBOLS
particular vehicle we tested. three years of data. rated from 3 to 5 based on how
We expect similar new models to Owner Satisfaction is based on many of these features are standard. 1 2 3 4 5
perform comparably. the percentage of owners who said Road-Test Results display test findings WORSE BETTER
Go to CR.org/newcarbuyingguide for our comprehensive guide to buying a new car, including the best deals, advice on negotiating
the price, tips on trade-ins, the pros and cons of leasing vs. buying, and a video on the most reliable brands.
LEARN
40 CR.ORG APRIL 2017 ILLUSTRATION BY PATRICK HRUBY

Ratings Electric, hybrid, subcompact, small, and compact cars 1 2 3 4 5 !
WORSE BETTER RECOMMENDED
Overall Survey
Make, Model & Trim Price Safety Road-Test Results
Score Results
Maneuver Speed,
Road-Test Score
0-60 MPH, Sec.

Recommended
Volume, Cu. Ft.

Duffels/Cargo
Seat Comfort,
60-0 MPH, Ft.
Acceleration,
Overall MPG
Dry Braking,
Satisfaction
Front Crash
Suitcases +
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Front/Rear
Avoidance
Reliability
As Tested
Predicted
Luggage,
Handling
Controls
Routine
Owner
MPH
CARS: COMPACT ELECTRICS AND HYBRIDS
0
! Toyota Prius Three $27,323 77 5
0 5
0 Std. / z
0 75 52 10.3 135 53.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 3/ 0
0 3 4
0 2+2
!
0 Ford C-Max Hybrid SE $26,685 73 3
0 4
0 Opt. 77 37 8.4 138 53.0 4
0 40
0/ 4 40
0/ 4 3
0 28.0
!
0 Ford C-Max Energi $34,940 73 3
0 4
0 Opt. 77 94/37 8.1 136 50.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 3
0 1+1
!
0 Toyota Prius V Three $28,217 71 5
0 4
0 Opt. 73 41 10.7 138 55.0 3
0 4/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 4 4
0 32.0
!
0 BMW i3 Giga $50,450 71 3
0 3
0 Opt. 79 139 7.5 131 55.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 5 4/ 0
0 3 3
0 1+1
Toyota Prius C Two $20,850 63 4

0 3
0 Std. / x
0 55 43 11.3 135 51.5 3
0 20
0/ 2 40
0/ 3 4
0 1+1
Nissan Leaf S $29,860 62 4

0 3
0 NA 71 106 10.3 136 52.5 4
0 40
0/ 4 40
0/ 3 4
0 2+1
Chevrolet Volt LT $35,890 54 1

0 5
0 Opt. 70 105/38 8.0 133 52.5 3
0 40
0/ 4 30
0/ 2 5
0 2+0
Ford Focus Electric $40,990 50 1

0 2
0 NA 72 107 10.2 140 52.5 5
0 50
0/ 4 40
0/ 3 2
0 1+1
Mitsubishi i-MiEV SE $33,630 44 3

0 2
0 NA 35 111 14.7 132 52.0 2
0 2/ 0
0 3 3/ 0
0 3 3
0 1+1
CARS: SUBCOMPACT
0
! Toyota Yaris iA $17,570 67 0
5 3
0 Std. / c
0 60 35 10.3 139 55.0 5
0 3/ 0
0 3 3/ 0
0 2 3
0 3+0
!
0 Honda Fit EX $19,025 66 3
0 4
0 NA 67 33 10.0 132 55.0 4
0 20
0/ 2 40
0/ 4 4
0 2+2
!
0 Chevrolet Sonic LT
(1.8L)
$17,290 64 3
0 1
0 Opt. 66 28 9.3 128 54.0 4
0 30
0/ 3 30
0/ 2 4
0 3+0
Nissan Versa Note SV $17,495 62 4

0 1
0 NA 61 31 10.9 135 54.5 4
0 30
0/ 3 30
0/ 4 5
0 1+2
Hyundai Accent SE $16,050 61 4

0 2
0 NA 65 31 10.3 134 51.5 4
0 30
0/ 3 40
0/ 3 5
0 3+1
Kia Rio EX $17,275 60 3

0 1
0 NA 64 30 9.5 138 55.0 4
0 20
0/ 3 40
0/ 3 5
0 2+3
Toyota Yaris LE $17,290 57 5

0 3
0 Std. / x
0 47 32 10.8 137 54.0 3
0 30
0/ 2 30
0/ 3 4
0 1+1
Nissan Versa SV (sedan) $15,490 56 3

0 1
0 NA 56 32 10.6 140 54.5 3
0 30
0/ 2 30
0/ 4 4
0 4+0
Chevrolet Spark 1LT $16,660 50 3

0 3
0 Opt. 47 33 12.0 129 57.5 3
0 20
0/ 2 30
0/ 2 4
0 1+1
Ford Fiesta SE
(hatchback, 4-cyl., MT)
$17,795 48 1
0 2
0 NA 66 32 10.7 134 55.0 5
0 30
0/ 4 40
0/ 2 3
0 1+2
Ford Fiesta SE
(3-cyl., MT)
$18,720 47 1
0 2
0 NA 66 35 9.0 125 56.0 4
0 30
0/ 3 40
0/ 1 3
0 1+3
Ford Fiesta SE
(sedan, 4-cyl.)
$16,595 46 1
0 2
0 NA 64 33 10.9 142 52.5 4
0 40
0/ 4 40
0/ 2 3
0 3+1
Smart ForTwo Passion $18,730 41 2

0 4
0 Opt. 41 36 11.2 132 52.5 3
0 20
0/ 1 4/ –
0 3
0 1+1
Mitsubishi Mirage ES $16,050 37 3

0 2
0 NA 29 37 12.1 138 52.5 2
0 30
0/ 1 3/ 0
0 3 4
0 1+1
CARS: SMALL 2-DOOR
!
0 Hyundai Veloster
(base, MT)
$20,340 63 3
0 3
0 NA 67 31 9.2 131 54.0 4
0 3/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 1 4
0 1+3
Mini Cooper (base, AT) $27,400 58 2

0 4
0 Opt. 68 31 8.3 133 54.5 5
0 3/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 1 3
0 1+1
Volkswagen Beetle S
1.8T (AT)
$22,485 46 1
0 2
0 NA 59 27 8.4 136 51.0 4
0 3/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 2 4
0 2+1
Fiat 500C Pop (MT) $21,000 44 1

0 2
0 NA 52 34 11.0 129 53.0 4
0 2/ 0
0 3 3/ 0
0 1 3
0 0+2
Fiat 500 Sport (MT) $18,600 40 1

0 2
0 NA 54 33 11.3 134 55.0 5
0 2/ 0
0 3 3/ 0
0 1 3
0 1+0
CARS: COMPACT
0
! Chevrolet Cruze LT $23,145 78 5
0 3
0 Opt. 77 30 8.5 125 56.0 3 0
0 4/ 0
4 0
3/ 0
3 0
5 3+1
!
0 Toyota Corolla LE $20,652 77 5
0 4
0 Std. / z
0 71 32 9.9 138 54.5 3 0
0 40
/ 3 0
30
/ 4 0
4 3+1
!
0 Kia Forte LX $19,570 73 4
0 2
0 Opt. 80 33 10.1 128 52.5 4 0
0 40
/ 4 0
40
/ 3 0
5 3+1

Ratings Compact and midsized cars
Overall Survey
Score Results
Maneuver Speed,
Road-Test Score
0-60 MPH, Sec.

Recommended
Volume, Cu. Ft.

Duffels/Cargo
Seat Comfort,
60-0 MPH, Ft.
Acceleration,
Overall MPG
Dry Braking,
Satisfaction
Front Crash
Suitcases +
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Front/Rear
Avoidance
Reliability
As Tested
Predicted
Luggage,
Handling
Controls
Routine
Owner
MPH
CARS: COMPACT (Continued)
0
! Mazda3 Grand Touring
(hatchback, 2.0L, MT)
$24,040 72 4
0 4
0 Opt. 73 32 8.2 133 54.0 5
0 3/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 3 3
0 2+2
!
0 Mazda3 Touring (2.0L) $21,740 72 4
0 4
0 Opt. 72 33 8.3 133 54.5 5
0 30
0/ 3 40
0/ 3 4
0 2+3
!
0 Kia Soul Plus $24,115 71 3
0 4
0 Opt. 74 26 8.8 127 53.5 4
0 30
0/ 3 40
0/ 4 5
0 24.5
!
0 Toyota Corolla iM $19,995 70 5
0 3
0 Std. / x
0 64 31 10.0 133 52.5 4
0 3/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 3 4
0 1+3
!
0 Hyundai Elantra SE $20,090 69 4
0 5
0 Opt. 66 33 9.9 133 54.0 3
0 3/ 0
0 3 3/ 0
0 3 5
0 3+1
Volkswagen Golf SE
(1.8T)
$25,315 64 2
0 4
0 Opt. 82 28 8.7 130 54.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 5
0 2+1
Mitsubishi Lancer ES $17,515 61 3

0 2
0 NA 62 25 9.8 144 49.5 4
0 40
0/ 3 40
0/ 3 5
0 3+1
Nissan Sentra SV $20,125 61 3

0 1
0 Opt. 62 31 10.4 129 56.0 3
0 30
0/ 3 30
0/ 4 5
0 3+2
Volkswagen Jetta SE
(1.4T)
$21,235 59 1
0 2
0 Opt. 79 32 9.1 131 53.0 4
0 40
0/ 4 40
0/ 4 4
0 3+2
Honda Civic LX $20,275 58 1

0 4
0 Opt. 76 32 8.7 129 56.0 4
0 40
0/ 3 30
0/ 3 5
0 3+1
Mini Clubman Base
(1.5T)
$31,550 57 2
0 4
0 Opt. 67 28 10.5 129 56.5 4
0 30
0/ 3 40
0/ 2 3
0 1+2
Honda Civic EX-T $23,035 57 1

0 4
0 Opt. 75 31 7.1 129 54.5 4
0 40
0/ 3 30
0/ 3 3
0 3+1
Ford Focus SE (2.0L) $20,485 47 1

0 2
0 NA 67 29 9.8 128 51.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 3/ 0
0 3 4
0 2+1
Ford Focus SE (1.0T) $21,455 45 1

0 2
0 NA 62 29 11.0 128 51.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 3/ 0
0 3 4
0 2+1
Fiat 500L $24,595 35 1

0 1
0 NA 50 27 9.5 132 51.5 4
0 20
0/ 3 30
0/ 4 3
0 2+2
CARS: MIDSIZED
0
! Kia Optima EX (2.4L) $25,860 85 5
0 5
0 Opt. 86 28 8.0 130 51.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 5 5
0 3+2
!
0 Toyota Camry Hybrid
XLE
$29,052 85 5
0 4
0 Opt. 87 38 7.6 133 51.0 4
0 40
0/ 4 40
0/ 4 4
0 3+1
!
0 Toyota Camry XLE (V6) $32,603 84 5
0 4
0 Opt. 86 26 6.4 136 50.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 4
0 4+0
!
0 Toyota Camry LE (4-cyl.) $24,089 83 5
0 4
0 Opt. 84 28 8.6 131 53.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 4
0 4+0
!
0 Honda Accord LX
(4-cyl.)
$23,270 82 4
0 4
0 Opt. 85 30 7.7 136 53.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 4
0 3+2
!
0 Honda Accord EX-L (V6) $30,860 81 4
0 4
0 Opt. 84 26 6.3 139 52.5 4
0 40
0/ 4 50
0/ 4 4
0 3+2
!
0 Subaru Legacy 2.5i
Premium
$24,837 79 3
0 4
0 Opt. 89 26 10.2 128 55.5 4
0 50
0/ 4 40
0/ 4 5
0 3+1
!
0 Ford Fusion SE (1.5T) $27,720 77 4
0 3
0 Opt. 81 24 9.2 125 52.5 5
0 50
0/ 4 30
0/ 4 4
0 3+2
!
0 Mazda6 Sport $23,590 77 4
0 4
0 Opt. 79 32 7.5 132 53.0 4
0 30
0/ 3 40
0/ 4 4
0 3+2
!
0 Ford Fusion SE Hybrid $28,290 76 4
0 3
0 Opt. 80 39 8.3 140 52.0 4
0 50
0/ 4 30
0/ 4 4
0 2+3
!
0 Chevrolet Malibu 1LT
(1.5T)
$26,790 76 3
0 4
0 Opt. 80 29 8.4 130 53.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 3/ 0
0 4 5
0 3+2
!
0 Chevrolet Malibu
Hybrid
$30,735 75 3
0 4
0 Opt. 79 41 8.0 135 55.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 3/ 0
0 4 5
0 1+2
!
0 Ford Fusion Titanium
(2.0T)
$33,180 75 4
0 3
0 Opt. 78 22 7.4 130 53.5 5
0 40
0/ 4 40
0/ 4 2
0 3+1
!
0 Hyundai Sonata
Hybrid SE
$26,950 75 3
0 4
0 Opt. 80 39 8.2 140 51.0 3
0 40
0/ 4 40
0/ 5 5
0 2+2
!
0 Hyundai Sonata SE
(2.4L)
$23,315 73 3
0 4
0 Opt. 78 28 9.2 139 50.5 3
0 40
0/ 4 40
0/ 5 5
0 3+2
Nissan Altima 3.5 SL $31,610 72 3

0 2
0 Opt. 80 24 6.3 133 52.0 3
0 30
0/ 4 40
0/ 4 5
0 3+1
Nissan Altima 2.5 SV $26,890 67 3

0 2
0 Opt. 71 29 8.4 135 52.0 3
0 30
0/ 4 40
0/ 4 5
0 3+2
Volkswagen Passat SE
(1.8T)
$27,485 65 2
0 2
0 Std. / x
0 82 28 8.6 129 52.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 5 4
0 3+1
Volkswagen Passat SEL
Premium (V6)
$33,720 64 2
0 2
0 Std. / x
0 79 23 6.8 132 52.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 5 4
0 3+0

Ratings Large, luxury entry-level, luxury compact, and luxury midsized cars 1 2 3 4 5 !
Overall Survey
Score Results
Maneuver Speed,
Road-Test Score
0-60 MPH, Sec.

Recommended
Volume, Cu. Ft.

Duffels/Cargo
Seat Comfort,
60-0 MPH, Ft.
Acceleration,
Overall MPG
Dry Braking,
Satisfaction
Front Crash
Suitcases +
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Front/Rear
Avoidance
Reliability
As Tested
Predicted
Luggage,
Handling
Controls
Routine
Owner
MPH
CARS: LARGE
0
! Chevrolet Impala
Premier (V6)
$39,110 84 3
0 4
0 Opt. 91 22 6.9 130 54.0 4
0 5/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 4 4
0 4+2
!
0 Toyota Avalon Limited
(V6)
$42,010 83 5
0 4
0 Std. / z
0 80 24 6.6 135 52.0 3
0 40
0/ 4 50
0/ 4 4
0 4+0
!
0 Nissan Maxima Platinum $41,995 72 3
0 4
0 Opt. 81 25 6.5 132 53.0 4
0 30
0/ 4 50
0/ 3 5
0 3+0
Chrysler 300 C (V8) $45,650 66 3

0 4
0 Opt. 84 20 6.1 134 49.5 4
0 40
0/ 5 50
0/ 5 4
0 3+1
Chrysler 300 Limited
(V6)
$38,335 66 3
0 4
0 Opt. 83 22 7.4 137 50.0 4
0 40
0/ 5 50
0/ 5 4
0 3+1
Ford Taurus Limited
(3.5, V6)
$37,885 66 3
0 3
0 Opt. 72 21 7.2 135 50.0 3
0 40
0/ 4 40
0/ 4 3
0 4+2
Dodge Charger R/T
Plus (V8)
$40,375 61 1
0 4
0 Opt. 85 20 6.1 128 50.5 4
0 40
0/ 5 50
0/ 4 5
0 2+3
Dodge Charger SXT
(V6)
$34,510 60 1
0 4
0 Opt. 82 22 7.4 134 52.0 4
0 40
0/ 4 50
0/ 4 5
0 3+1
CARS: LUXURY ENTRY-LEVEL
!
0 Volkswagen CC Sport
(2.0T)
$32,800 70 3
0 2
0 Opt. 78 26 7.5 133 52.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 3 4
0 3+1
Audi A3 Premium $31,495 69 2

0 4
0 Std. / x
0 77 27 8.3 124 53.0 4
0 30
0/ 3 40
0/ 2 3
0 2+1
Lexus CT 200h
Premium
$32,012 66 5
0 2
0 Opt. 65 40 11.0 133 54.5 4
0 20
0/ 3 40
0/ 3 4
0 1+1
Acura ILX Premium $30,820 64 4

0 1
0 Opt. 61 28 7.5 132 54.5 3
0 20
0/ 2 40
0/ 3 3
0 2+2
Volkswagen Jetta GLI
SE (MT)
$27,740 57 1
0 2
0 Opt. 74 27 7.2 132 54.5 4
0 3/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 4 4
0 3+2
Mercedes-Benz
CLA250
$36,500 51 2
0 1
0 Std. / x
0 64 28 6.6 124 54.0 4
0 2/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 2 2
0 2+2
CARS: LUXURY COMPACT
0
! Buick Regal Premium I $34,485 81 5
0 4
0 Opt. 83 24 7.4 125 53.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 3 4
0 3+1
!
0 Audi A4 Premium Plus $48,890 81 4
0 4
0 Std. / x
0 88 27 6.3 135 53.5 5
0 5/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 5 3
0 2+2
!
0 BMW 328d xDrive $50,475 77 3
0 3
0 Opt. 86 35 8.5 132 54.0 5
0 40
0/ 4 50
0/ 3 3
0 2+1
!
0 BMW 330i xDrive $51,745 76 3
0 3
0 Opt. 86 26 6.9 129 55.0 5
0 40
0/ 4 50
0/ 3 3
0 2+2
!
0 Volvo S60 T5 $39,925 73 3
0 3
0 Std. / c
0 80 25 7.9 128 54.0 4
0 30
0/ 4 50
0/ 3 4
0 3+0
Infiniti Q50 3.0t
Premium (AWD)
$48,775 71 2
0 1
0 Opt. 85 22 5.7 126 56.0 4
0 40
0/ 4 40
0/ 3 3
0 2+1
Mercedes-Benz C300
(4Matic)
$47,560 67 2
0 3
0 Std. / x
0 85 26 6.8 136 55.5 4
0 50
0/ 4 50
0/ 3 2
0 2+1
Lexus IS300 (AWD) $48,149 66 5

0 2
0 Std. / z
0 56 20 6.5 139 53.0 4
0 30
0/ 4 40
0/ 2 3
0 2+1
Cadillac ATS Luxury
(2.0T)
$43,295 60 1
0 2
0 Opt. 79 23 6.5 125 57.5 5
0 4/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 2 1
0 2+1
Acura TLX 2.4L $35,920 60 1

0 3
0 Opt. 79 27 7.4 129 54.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 3 3
0 2+2
Acura TLX SH-AWD $42,345 57 1

0 3
0 Opt. 75 25 6.5 129 55.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 3 2
0 2+2
CARS: LUXURY MIDSIZED
0
! Infiniti Q70 (V6) $53,825 88 5
0 4
0 Opt. 90 21 5.8 128 54.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 5 4
0 3+2
!
0 Lexus GS 350 $58,858 85 5
0 4
0 Std. / z
0 83 21 6.2 137 53.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 4 3
0 3+1
!
0 Audi A6 3.0 Premium
Plus Quattro
$56,295 84 4
0 4
0 Opt. 90 22 5.7 132 52.5 4
0 5/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 4 3
0 3+1
!
0 Infiniti Q70 Hybrid $58,655 83 5
0 4
0 Opt. 83 25 5.6 131 52.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 4
0 2+1
!
0 Lexus ES 350 $43,702 82 5
0 4
0 Std. / z
0 78 25 6.7 139 51.5 3
0 40
0/ 5 50
0/ 4 3
0 3+2
!
0 Lexus ES 300h $44,017 81 5
0 4
0 Std. / z
0 77 36 8.2 140 51.0 3
0 40
0/ 4 50
0/ 4 3
0 3+1
!
0 Lincoln MKZ 2.0
EcoBoost
$41,990 81 3
0 4
0 Opt. 88 23 7.4 124 53.0 5
0 50
0/ 5 50
0/ 3 4
0 3+2
ALERT This vehicle can be outfitted with a semi-autonomous driving package. Consumer Reports believes automakers should take stronger steps to ensure
that vehicles with those systems are designed, deployed, and marketed safely. Please heed all warnings and keep your hands on the wheel. CR.ORG 43
Ratings Luxury midsized, ultra-luxury, and sports/sporty cars
Overall Survey
Score Results
Maneuver Speed,
Road-Test Score
0-60 MPH, Sec.

Recommended
Volume, Cu. Ft.

Duffels/Cargo
Seat Comfort,
60-0 MPH, Ft.
Acceleration,
Overall MPG
Dry Braking,
Satisfaction
Front Crash
Suitcases +
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Front/Rear
Avoidance
Reliability
As Tested
Predicted
Luggage,
Handling
Controls
Routine
Owner
MPH
CARS: LUXURY MIDSIZED (Continued)
0
! Lincoln MKZ Hybrid $41,990 81 3
0 4
0 Opt. 88 34 9.2 129 53.0 5
0 5/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 3 4
0 2+2
!
0 Cadillac CT6 Luxury
(3.6, AWD)
$64,485 81 3
0 4
0 Opt. 95 22 6.5 125 52.0 5
0 5/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 4 3
0 3+2
!
0 Genesis G80 3.8 (AWD) $52,450 80 3
0 5
0 Std. / z
0 89 20 7.2 129 53.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 4 5
0 3+1
!
0 Buick LaCrosse
Essence
$43,225 78 3
0 4
0 Opt. 85 24 6.3 127 54.0 3
0 5/ 0
0 5 4/ 0
0 4 4
0 3+2
!
0 Cadillac XTS Premium $57,200 77 4
0 3
0 Opt. 82 22 7.2 128 53.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 4 1
0 4+1
Acura RLX Tech $55,345 75 4

0 1
0 Std. / z
0 75 23 6.5 128 51.5 3
0 3/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 4 2
0 2+3
Mercedes-Benz E300
(4Matic)
$69,585 74 3
0 4
0 Std. / z
0 85 24 7.1 128 54.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 3 1
0 2+2
Chevrolet SS $47,170 74 2
0 5
0 Std. / c
0 87 17 5.1 118 56.0 5
0 3/ 0
0 3 5/ 0
0 4 5
0 3+1
Cadillac CTS Luxury
(V6, AWD)
$58,780 71 3
0 3
0 Opt. 83 22 6.5 127 54.5 5
0 4/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 3 1
0 2+2
Volvo S90 T6
Momentum (AWD)
$61,855 62 2
0 4
0 Std. / z
0 73 23 7.2 130 52.5 4
0 3/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 4 2
0 2+2
Jaguar XF Prestige (V6) $66,586 61 2

0 4
0 Opt. 83 21 5.8 128 51.0 5
0 5/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 4 3
0 2+1
Maserati Ghibli S Q4 $89,010 48 1

0 2
0 Opt. 71 19 5.4 115 53.5 4
0 20
0/ 3 40
0/ 3 3
0 2+2
CARS: ULTRA-LUXURY
0
! Tesla Model S P85D $127,820 87 3
0 5
0 Std. / z
0 100 87 3.5 118 55.5 5
0 4/ 0
0 5 4/ 0
0 3 2
0 4+3
!
0 Lexus LS 460L $82,504 87 5
0 5
0 Opt. 89 21 6.2 140 48.5 4
0 50
0/ 5 50
0/ 5 3
0 3+2
!
0 BMW 750i xDrive $110,645 85 3
0 4
0 Opt. 99 21 5.3 131 52.5 4
0 50
0/ 5 50
0/ 5 3
0 2+4
!
0 Audi A8 L $91,275 82 4
0 4
0 Opt. 91 21 5.5 126 52.0 4
0 50
0/ 5 50
0/ 5 2
0 3+1
Mercedes-Benz S550
(4Matic)
$114,475 68 1
0 4
0 Std. / x
0 96 18 5.1 128 51.0 4
0 50
0/ 5 50
0/ 5 2
0 2+3
Jaguar XJL
Portfolio $81,575 61 2
0 4
0 NA 82 19 5.5 138 52.5 4
0 40
0/ 5 50
0/ 5 3
0 2+1
Overall Survey
Score Results
Quarter Mile, Sec.
Routine Handling
Road Test Score
Driving Position
0-60 MPH, Sec.
Recommended
60-0 MPH, Ft.

Acceleration,
Acceleration
Overall MPG
Dry Braking,
Speed, MPH
Satisfaction
Front-Crash
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Avoidance
Maneuver,
Reliability
Predicted
As tested
Controls
Owner
SPORTS/SPORTY CARS OVER $40,000 Equipped with manual transmission.
!
0 BMW M235i $50,400 92 5
0 4
0 Opt. 98 25 5.2 13.8 115 58.5 5
0 3/ 0
0 4 4
0 4
0
0
! Chevrolet Corvette
Stingray 3LT
$73,260 83 3
0 5
0 NA 92 20 4.3 12.6 107 57.5 5
0 2/ 0
0 2 3
0 5
0
0
! Porsche 911 Carrera S $110,630 82 3
0 5
0 Opt. 95 23 4.1 12.4 108 59.5 5
0 2/ 0
0 2 4
0 3
0
0
! Porsche 718 Boxster
(base, AT)
$69,790 82 3
0 5
0 Opt. 95 26 4.5 13.0 108 59.0 5
0 20
0/2 3
0 3
0
0
! Audi TT 2.0T (AT) $50,600 81 4
0 4
0 NA 84 26 6.3 14.8 113 58.0 5
0 3/ 0
0 3 4
0 2
0
0
! Chevrolet Camaro 2SS
(V8)
$47,020 76 3
0 5
0 NA 85 20 4.4 12.7 112 56.0 5
0 3/ 0
0 3 2
0 4
0
Ford Mustang GT
Premium (V8)
$43,295 62 1
0 5
0 Opt. 84 19 4.9 13.4 121 54.5 5
0 3/ 0
0 3 4
0 3
0
Dodge Challenger R/T
Plus (V8)
$40,860 53 1
0 5
0 Opt. 70 20 5.5 13.9 119 51.5 4
0 3/ 0
0 3 3
0 4
0

Ratings Sports/sporty cars, wagons, minivans, and subcompact SUVs 1 2 3 4 5 !
Overall Survey
Score Results
Quarter Mile, Sec.

Road Test Score
Driving Position
0-60 MPH, Sec.
Recommended
60-0 MPH, Ft.

Acceleration,
Routine Han-
Acceleration
Overall MPG
Dry Braking,
Speed, MPH
Satisfaction
Front-Crash
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Avoidance
Maneuver,
Reliability
Predicted
As tested
Controls
Owner
dling
SPORTS/SPORTY CARS UNDER $40,000 Equipped with manual transmission.
0
! Mazda MX-5 Miata Club $29,905 79 4
0 5
0 NA 80 34 6.7 15.1 124 57.5 5
0 2/ 0
0 1 2
0 3
0
0
! Nissan 370Z Touring
(coupe)
$38,565 75 3
0 3
0 NA 81 23 5.3 13.9 120 58.0 5
0 20
0 / 2 2
0 4
0
!
0 Subaru BRZ Premium $27,117 73 3
0 3
0 NA 79 30 7.2 15.6 126 56.0 5
0 20
0 / 2 4
0 4
0
0
! Toyota 86 $25,025 73 3
0 3
0 NA 78 30 7.2 15.5 126 56.5 5
0 2/ 0
0 2 4
0 4
0
Volkswagen GTI
Autobahn
$31,730 71 2
0 4
0 Opt. 82 29 6.6 15.2 132 55.0 5
0 30
0 / 4 4
0 5
0
Mini Cooper S $29,945 66 2
0 4
0 Opt. 81 30 7.2 15.5 130 56.0 5
0 30
0 / 3 4
0 4
0
Buick Cascada Premium $37,385 60 4
0 4
0 Opt. 53 22 8.9 17.0 134 54.0 4
0 40
0 / 2 3
0 2
0
Subaru WRX Premium $29,742 59 2
0 4
0 Opt. 75 26 6.0 14.5 120 59.0 5
0 2/ 0
0 2 4
0 5
0
Ford Mustang Premium
(4-cyl., AT)
$33,080 58 1
0 5
0 Opt. 76 25 6.4 14.9 125 53.0 5
0 30
0 / 3 4
0 3
0
Fiat 500 Abarth $26,050 52 1
0 2
0 NA 66 28 8.0 16.1 125 55.5 5
0 10
0 / 2 3
0 3
0
Ford Fiesta ST $24,985 52 1
0 2
0 NA 74 29 7.3 15.6 118 57.0 5
0 1/ 0
0 3 3
0 3
0
Ford Focus ST $28,270 51 1
0 2
0 NA 74 26 6.6 15.1 122 53.0 5
0 2/ 0
0 3 3
0 4
0
Overall Survey
Score Results
Road-Test Score
0-60 MPH, Sec.

Recommended
Cargo Volume,
Seat Comfort,
60-0 MPH, Ft.
Acceleration,
Overall MPG
Speed, MPH
Satisfaction
Front-Crash
Dry Braking
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Front/Rear
Avoidance
Maneuver,
Reliability
Predicted
As tested
Handling
Controls
Routine
Owner
Cu. Ft.
WAGONS (ALL-WHEEL DRIVE)
0
! Subaru Outback 3.6R
Limited
$36,835 75 0
3 0
5 Opt. 85 22 7.4 134 55.0 0
3 0/ 0
4 4 0/ 0
4 4 0
5 34.0
!
0 Subaru Outback 2.5i
Premium
$28,852 73 3
0 5
0 Opt. 82 24 10.5 133 53.5 3
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 5
0 34.0
Volvo V60 Cross
Country
$46,475 68 3
0 3
0 Std. / c
0 73 21 8.1 127 49.5 4
0 30
0 / 4 50
0/ 3 4
0 26.0
Volkswagen Golf
Alltrack SE
$32,515 66 1
0 3
0 Opt. 89 25 8.5 124 56.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 5
0 30.5
MINIVANS
0
! Toyota Sienna XLE
(FWD)
$35,810 80 0
5 0
5 Opt. 80 20 8.8 134 49.0 0
3 0/ 0
4 4 0/ 0
4 5 0
4 70.5
!
0 Honda Odyssey EX-L $38,055 79 3
0 4
0 Opt. 84 21 8.4 136 47.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 5 4
0 61.5
!
0 Toyota Sienna XLE
(AWD)
$38,201 78 5
0 5
0 Opt. 78 19 8.5 139 48.5 3
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 5 4
0 70.5
Ford Transit Connect
XLT (2.5L)
$28,015 68 3
0 2
0 NA 76 21 10.9 132 53.0 4
0 30
0 / 3 30
0/ 5 4
0 61.0
Kia Sedona EX $34,795 67 3

0 4
0 Opt. 70 20 8.0 133 48.0 3
0 30
0 / 4 40
0/ 5 4
0 46.0
Chrysler Pacifica
Touring L
$38,245 66 2
0 5
0 Opt. 85 21 8.0 136 51.5 3
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 5
0 66.0
Dodge Grand Caravan
GT
$37,295 62 3
0 3
0 NA 72 17 8.1 141 49.0 3
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 3
0 61.5
SUVs: SUBCOMPACTS
0
! Subaru Crosstrek
Premium
$24,215 76 0
5 0
4 Opt. 74 26 9.7 130 53.0 0
4 0/ 0
3 3 0/ 0
4 4 0
5 23.0
!
0 Honda HR-V LX $22,045 69 4
0 3
0 NA 66 29 10.5 132 55.0 4
0 20
0 / 2 20
0/ 4 5
0 32.0
!
0 Mazda CX-3 Touring $25,800 64 3
0 3
0 Opt. 64 28 9.6 135 53.5 5
0 30
0 / 3 30
0/ 2 3
0 18.0
Chevrolet Trax LT $25,560 62 5

0 2
0 Opt. 55 25 10.8 130 54.0 3
0 2/ 0
0 3 3/ 0
0 3 3
0 26.0
Fiat 500X Easy $26,600 42 1

0 4
0 Opt. 50 23 9.8 130 52.5 3
0 2/ 0
0 2 3/ 0
0 3 4
0 19.5
Jeep Renegade Latitude $27,525 42 1

0 3
0 Opt. 56 24 9.9 130 51.5 3
0 20
0 / 3 30
0/ 3 4
0 30.5
Ratings Compact, midsized, and large SUVs
Overall Survey
Score Results
Road-Test Score
0-60 MPH, Sec.

Recommended
Cargo Volume,
Seat Comfort,
60-0 MPH, Ft.
Acceleration,
Overall MPG
Speed, MPH
Satisfaction
Front-Crash
Dry Braking
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Front/Rear
Avoidance
Maneuver,
Reliability
Predicted
As tested
Handling
Controls
Routine
Owner
Cu. Ft.
SUVs: COMPACT
0
! Subaru Forester 2.5i
Premium
$27,145 83 0
4 0
4 Opt. 85 26 8.7 127 52.0 0
4 0/ 0
3 3 0/ 0
4 5 0
5 35.5
!
0 Toyota RAV4 XLE $29,014 79 5
0 3
0 Std. / z
0 75 24 9.3 135 51.0 4
0 40
0 / 4 30
0/ 4 4
0 37.0
!
0 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid XLE $29,753 78 5
0 3
0 Std. / z
0 74 31 8.7 136 49.5 4
0 40
0 / 4 30
0/ 4 4
0 30.0
!
0 Kia Sportage LX (2.4L) $26,720 76 4
0 4
0 Opt. 78 23 9.6 128 52.5 4
0 3/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 4 5
0 29.5
!
0 Hyundai Tucson Sport
(1.6T)
$28,670 75 3
0 4
0 Opt. 79 26 8.4 128 53.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 5
0 29.5
!
0 Mazda CX-5 Touring
(2.5L)
$28,090 74 4
0 4
0 Opt. 74 25 8.0 133 52.5 4
0 30
0 / 3 40
0/ 4 4
0 33.0
!
0 Hyundai Tucson SE
(2.0L)
$25,920 73 3
0 4
0 Opt. 76 24 11.0 129 54.0 4
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 5
0 29.5
!
0 Volkswagen Tiguan SEL $37,020 72 4
0 3
0 NA 74 21 8.5 140 53.5 4
0 20
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 4
0 30.0
!
0 Ford Escape SE (1.5T) $29,630 71 3
0 3
0 Opt. 75 23 10.1 132 50.0 4
0 40
0 / 4 30
0/ 3 5
0 34.0
!
0 Nissan Rogue SV $29,920 71 4
0 2
0 Opt. 74 24 9.5 134 54.0 3
0 4/ 0
0 3 3/ 0
0 4 5
0 31.5
Mitsubishi Outlander
SEL (4-cyl.)
$28,405 60 3
0 2
0 Opt. 59 24 10.0 132 50.5 2
0 3/ 0
0 3 3/ 0
0 4 4
0 32.5
Jeep Cherokee Limited
(V6)
$37,525 55 2
0 2
0 Opt. 71 21 7.7 133 51.5 3
0 30
0 / 4 40
0/ 5 5
0 31.0
Jeep Cherokee Latitude
(4-cyl.)
$27,490 47 2
0 2
0 Opt. 58 22 10.9 138 51.5 3
0 30
0 / 4 30
0/ 4 4
0 31.0
SUVs: MIDSIZED
0
! Toyota Highlander
Hybrid Limited
$50,875 86 0
4 0
4 Std. / z
0 85 25 8.3 138 49.0 0
3 0/ 0
4 4 0/ 0
5 4 0
4 40.5
!
0 Toyota Highlander XLE
(V6)
$38,941 85 4
0 4
0 Std. / z
0 84 20 7.5 134 50.5 3
0 4/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 4 4
0 40.5
!
0 Kia Sorento EX (V6) $37,915 82 4
0 5
0 Opt. 84 21 7.4 131 49.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 5
0 37.5
!
0 Hyundai Santa Fe SE
(V6)
$36,290 78 4
0 3
0 Opt. 81 20 7.6 133 51.0 3
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 5 5
0 40.5
!
0 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport
(4-cyl.)
$28,370 75 5
0 4
0 Opt. 73 23 9.7 132 50.5 3
0 40
0 / 3 40
0/ 4 5
0 35.5
!
0 Honda Pilot EX-L $39,585 75 3
0 4
0 Opt. 80 20 7.5 136 49.5 3
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 5 3
0 48.0
!
0 Mazda CX-9 Touring $40,470 74 3
0 4
0 Opt. 80 22 7.9 139 50.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 5 3
0 34.0
!
0 Ford Edge SEL
(2.0 EcoBoost)
$39,755 73 3
0 4
0 Opt. 84 21 8.8 132 51.5 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 5 4
0 39.0
!
0 Nissan Murano SL $42,065 73 3
0 4
0 Opt. 77 21 7.7 131 50.5 3
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 4
0 33.5
Toyota 4Runner SR5
(V6)
$37,425 62 5
0 4
0 NA 55 18 7.7 131 48.0 2
0 20
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 4
0 44.5
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Limited (diesel)
$49,780 61 1
0 4
0 Opt. 84 24 8.6 132 50.5 3
0 40
0 / 4 50
0/ 4 5
0 36.5
Ford Explorer XLT (V6) $39,275 59 2

0 3
0 Opt. 67 18 7.9 135 49.5 3
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 2
0 42.0
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Limited (V6)
$41,375 58 1
0 4
0 Opt. 80 18 8.0 134 50.0 3
0 4/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 4 5
0 36.5
Nissan Pathfinder SL $40,470 56 2

0 1
0 Opt. 72 18 7.7 137 47.0 2
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 5
0 39.5
Dodge Journey GT (V6) $36,975 49 2

0 1
0 NA 64 16 8.1 139 50.0 3
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 4
0 37.0
Jeep Wrangler
Unlimited Sahara
$36,340 28 2
0 4
0 NA 20 17 8.9 151 45.0 2
0 10
0 / 2 30
0/ 3 3
0 34.5
SUVs: LARGE
0
! Chevrolet Traverse LT $39,920 76 0
4 0
3 Opt. 77 16 7.9 141 50.0 0
4 0/ 0
4 4 0/ 0
4 4 0
4 48.5
!
0 Ford Flex SEL $42,155 74 4
0 5
0 Opt. 73 18 8.5 141 48.0 3
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 5 3
0 47.5
!
0 Ford Expedition EL
Limited
$63,080 67 5
0 5
0 NA 61 14 7.2 136 45.0 2
0 4/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 4 4
0 71.0
!
0 Toyota Sequoia Limited $54,005 65 4
0 4
0 NA 60 15 7.1 146 47.0 3
0 20
0 / 4 40
0/ 5 4
0 61.0
Nissan Armada Platinum $63,020 59 2

0 4
0 Opt. 69 14 6.7 133 50.5 2
0 40
0 / 5 40
0/ 4 4
0 46.5

Ratings Large, luxury entry-level, luxury compact, and luxury midsized SUVs 1 2 3 4 5 !
Overall Survey
Score Results
Road-Test Score
0-60 MPH, Sec.

Recommended
Cargo Volume,
Seat Comfort,
60-0 MPH, Ft.
Acceleration,
Overall MPG
Speed, MPH
Satisfaction
Front-Crash
Dry Braking
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Front/Rear
Avoidance
Maneuver,
Reliability
Predicted
As tested
Handling
Controls
Routine
Owner
Cu. Ft.
SUVs: LARGE (Continued)
Dodge Durango GT (V6) $43,525 58 0

2 0
5 Opt. 83 18 8.3 134 48.0 0
3 0/ 0
4 5 0/ 0
5 4 0
5 44.0
Chevrolet Suburban
LTZ
$69,790 54 1
0 4
0 Opt. 74 16 7.9 139 47.0 2
0 40
0 / 5 40
0/ 4 5
0 62.5
Chevrolet Tahoe LT $60,100 51 1

0 4
0 Opt. 67 16 7.7 136 45.0 2
0 30
0 / 5 40
0/ 4 5
0 47.5
GMC Yukon SLT $62,125 51 1

0 4
0 Opt. 67 16 7.7 136 45.0 2
0 3/ 0
0 5 4/ 0
0 4 5
0 47.5
GMC Yukon XL SLT $67,370 50 1

0 4
0 Opt. 67 16 7.9 139 45.0 2
0 3/ 0
0 5 4/ 0
0 4 5
0 62.5
SUVs: LUXURY ENTRY-LEVEL
0
! Audi Q3 Premium Plus $40,125 80 0
5 0
4 NA 77 22 8.4 132 51.5 0
4 0/ 0
4 4 0/ 0
4 4 0
3 24.5
! BMW X1 xDrive28i $44,745 72 4

0 4
0 Opt. 74 26 7.9 134 53.0 4
0 30
0 / 3 30
0/ 3 4
0 27.0
! Buick Encore Leather $30,555 71 4

0 3
0 Opt. 69 23 11.0 127 55.0 3
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 3 4
0 26.0
Mercedes-Benz
GLA250
$42,210 66 3
0 3
0 Std. / x
0 70 26 6.9 128 54.5 4
0 3/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 2 2
0 23.0
Infiniti QX30 Premium $43,745 65 3

0 3
0 Opt. 71 25 7.1 122 57.0 4
0 3/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 2 3
0 21.5
SUVs: LUXURY COMPACT
0
! Mercedes-Benz GLC
300
$49,105 79 0
5 0
4 Std. / x
0 81 22 6.8 132 50.0 0
4 0/ 0
4 4 0/ 0
5 4 0
2 28.0
!
0 Lexus NX 200t $43,284 76 5
0 3
0 Opt. 74 24 7.5 132 49.5 4
0 30
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 3
0 28.5
!
0 Lexus NX 300h $51,224 74 5
0 3
0 Opt. 71 29 8.9 136 49.5 4
0 30
0 / 3 40
0/ 4 3
0 28.5
!
0 Porsche Macan S $63,290 74 3
0 5
0 Opt. 85 19 6.4 130 51.0 5
0 3/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 4 3
0 29.0
!
0 Acura RDX $38,990 72 4
0 3
0 Opt. 75 22 6.6 132 51.0 3
0 3/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 4 3
0 31.5
!
0 BMW X3 xDrive28i
(2.0T)
$44,595 72 3
0 3
0 Opt. 82 23 7.3 130 53.0 4
0 30
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 3
0 33.0
!
0 Volvo XC60 T6 $42,245 71 3
0 3
0 Std. / c
0 74 20 7.4 132 52.5 4
0 30
0 / 4 40
0/ 3 3
0 32.5
Cadillac XT5 Luxury $51,025 67 3

0 4
0 Opt. 76 20 7.1 132 53.5 4
0 30
0 / 5 40
0/ 4 2
0 33.0
Buick Envision Premium $45,380 66 3

0 4
0 Opt. 67 21 7.9 128 55.0 3
0 3/ 0
0 3 3/ 0
0 4 5
0 32.5
Jaguar F-Pace
Prestige
$53,895 56 2
0 4
0 Opt. 72 20 6.0 129 50.5 4
0 3/ 0
0 3 5/ 0
0 4 3
0 28.5
Lincoln MKC Reserve $46,485 54 1

0 3
0 Opt. 72 19 7.8 125 54.0 3
0 30
0 / 4 40
0/ 3 3
0 30.5
Land Rover Discovery
Sport HSE
$49,895 43 1
0 3
0 Opt. 58 21 8.6 136 50.5 3
0 20
0 / 3 40
0/ 5 3
0 33.0
SUVs: LUXURY MIDSIZED
0
! Audi Q7 Premium Plus $68,695 90 0
5 0
5 Std. / x
0 96 20 6.7 127 50.0 0
4 0/ 0
4 5 0/ 0
5 5 0
3 35.5
!
0 Lexus RX 450h $57,565 81 4
0 5
0 Std. / z
0 80 29 7.5 138 50.0 3
0 5/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 4 3
0 30.0
!
0 Lexus RX 350 $51,630 79 4
0 5
0 Std. / z
0 77 22 7.5 139 49.0 3
0 5/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 4 3
0 30.0
!
0 GMC Acadia Denali $51,585 76 3
0 4
0 Opt. 83 19 6.8 130 53.5 4
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 5 5
0 40.5
!
0 Lexus GX 460 $58,428 75 5
0 4
0 Opt. 70 17 7.5 136 48.0 3
0 30
0 / 4 50
0/ 4 4
0 36.5
!
0 Buick Enclave CXL $43,260 74 3
0 4
0 Opt. 77 15 7.9 142 50.0 4
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 4
0 44.0
!
0 Acura MDX Tech $51,410 73 3
0 3
0 Std. / z
0 79 21 6.8 135 52.0 3
0 40
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 2
0 34.0
!
0 Porsche Cayenne (V6) $63,805 72 3
0 4
0 Opt. 78 19 7.8 134 50.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 5 1
0 33.0
!
0 BMW X5 xDrive35i $70,050 72 3
0 4
0 Opt. 84 21 7.4 137 52.0 4
0 4/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 4 2
0 34.5
Mercedes-Benz
GLE350 (ML)
$56,960 68 3
0 5
0 Std. / x
0 75 18 6.8 138 48.0 4
0 40
0 / 5 50
0/ 4 3
0 37.5
Lincoln MKX
(2.7 EcoBoost)
$54,945 66 2
0 4
0 Opt. 87 18 7.2 128 53.5 4
0 50
0 / 5 40
0/ 5 4
0 32.5
Ratings Luxury midsized and luxury large SUVs, and compact 1 2 3 4 5 !
and full-size pickup trucks WORSE BETTER RECOMMENDED
Overall Survey
Score Results
Road-Test Score
0-60 MPH, Sec.

Recommended
Cargo Volume,
Seat Comfort,
60-0 MPH, Ft.
Acceleration,
Overall MPG
Speed, MPH
Satisfaction
Front-Crash
Dry Braking
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Front/Rear
Avoidance
Maneuver,
Reliability
Predicted
As tested
Handling
Controls
Routine
Owner
Cu. Ft.
SUVs: LUXURY MIDSIZED (Continued)
Infiniti QX60 (3.5L) $51,920 65 0

2 0
2 Opt. 79 19 8.3 137 47.0 0
3 0/ 0
4 5 0/ 0
5 3 0
5 39.0
Volvo XC90 T6
Momentum
$56,805 65 1
0 4
0 Std. / z
0 84 20 7.7 126 52.5 3
0 3/ 0
0 4 5/ 0
0 5 2
0 35.0
Infiniti QX70 $51,635 60 2

0 2
0 Opt. 72 18 6.8 133 51.0 4
0 30
0 / 4 50
0/ 4 4
0 25.5
Tesla Model X 90D $110,700 58 1

0 5
0 Std. / z
0 77 92 4.9 127 53.5 4
0 40
0 / 4 50
0/ 3 2
0 2+2
Land Rover Range Rover

Sport HSE (3.0L)
$74,040 55 1
0 4
0 Std. / x
0 74 18 6.5 137 49.5 4
0 30
0 / 4 40
0/ 4 2
0 31.5
SUVs: LUXURY LARGE
!
0 Toyota Land Cruiser $84,820 74 0
4 0
5 Std. / z
0 68 14 7.3 140 46.0 0
3 0/ 0
4 4 0/ 0
5 4 0
4 43.0
Lincoln Navigator Base $68,895 69 3

0 4
0 NA 72 15 7.0 136 48.5 2
0 4/ 0
0 3 4/ 0
0 4 4
0 61.5
Land Rover Range

Rover HSE (3.0L)
$88,545 58 1
0 4
0 Std. / x
0 80 17 6.7 137 48.5 3
0 5/ 0
0 5 5/ 0
0 5 3
0 34.5
Infiniti QX80 $63,395 57 2

0 2
0 Opt. 68 15 6.9 139 48.0 2
0 4/ 0
0 4 4/ 0
0 4 4
0 49.5
Mercedes-Benz GLS
(GL) 350d
$73,020 57 1
0 3
0 Std. / x
0 82 20 8.2 136 44.5 3
0 55
0 / 50
0/ 5 3
0 47.0
Cadillac Escalade
Premium
$87,360 44 1
0 4
0 Opt. 61 16 6.1 142 45.0 2
0 3/ 0
0 5 50
0/ 4 1
0 48.0
Overall Survey
Score Results
Acceleration, 0-60
Road Test Score
Driving Position
Recommended
60-0 MPH, Ft.
Seat Comfort
Overall MPG
Dry Braking,
Speed, MPH
Satisfaction
Front-Crash
Ride/Noise
Prevention
Front/Rear
Avoidance
MPH, Sec.
Maneuver
Reliability
Predicted
As tested
Handling
Controls
Routine
Owner
COMPACT PICKUP TRUCKS
!
0 Honda Ridgeline RTL $36,480 76 0
3 0
5 Opt. 80 20 7.3 134 53.5 0
3 0/ 0
4 4 0
4 0/ 0
4 3 0
5
Chevrolet Colorado
LT (V6)
$34,300 57 2
0 3
0 Opt. 69 18 7.5 132 48.5 3
0 20
0/ 3 3
0 20
0/ 3 5
0
GMC Canyon SLE (V6) $35,835 57 2
0 3
0 Opt. 69 18 7.5 132 48.5 3
0 2/ 0
0 3 3
0 2/ 0
0 3 5
0
Chevrolet Colorado LT
(diesel)
$39,295 56 2
0 3
0 Opt. 67 24 10.3 134 49.0 3
0 2/ 0
0 2 3
0 2/ 0
0 3 5
0
GMC Canyon SLE
(diesel)
$40,895 56 2
0 3
0 Opt. 67 24 10.3 134 49.0 3
0 2/ 0
0 2 3
0 2/ 0
0 3 5
0
Toyota Tacoma SR5 (V6) $34,364 41 1
0 3
0 NA 46 19 8.2 146 46.0 2
0 20
0/ 2 2
0 20
0/ 2 4
0
FULL-SIZED PICKUP TRUCKS
!
0 Toyota Tundra SR5
(5.7L V8)
$38,715 67 0
5 0
4 NA 63 15 6.7 153 44.5 0
3 0/ 0
2 4 0
3 0/ 0
4 3 0
4
Ford F-150 XLT
(3.5L V6 EcoBoost)
$46,755 65 2
0 5
0 Opt. 80 16 7.2 139 46.5 2
0 2/ 0
0 5 4
0 4/ 0
0 5 4
0
Chevrolet Silverado
1500 LT (5.3L V8)
$42,070 65 2
0 3
0 Opt. 80 16 7.5 138 45.5 3
0 2/ 0
0 5 3
0 3/ 0
0 5 4
0
GMC Sierra 1500 SLT
(5.3L V8)
$43,200 65 2
0 3
0 Opt. 80 16 7.5 138 45.5 3
0 20
0/ 5 3
0 30
0/ 5 4
0
Ford F-150 XLT
(2.7L V6 EcoBoost)
$45,750 64 2
0 5
0 Opt. 78 17 7.0 137 46.0 2
0 20
0/ 5 4
0 40
0/ 5 4
0
Ram 1500 Big Horn
(V6, diesel)
$49,155 54 1
0 4
0 NA 82 20 9.5 143 47.0 2
0 4/ 0
0 4 3
0 4/ 0
0 5 4
0
Ram 1500 Big Horn
(5.7L V8)
$42,810 54 1
0 4
0 NA 81 15 7.1 141 47.0 2
0 4/ 0
0 5 3
0 4/ 0
0 5 4
0
Nissan Titan XD SV
(diesel)
$51,075 50 2
0 4
0 NA 55 15 10.6 147 45.0 1
0 2/ 0
0 3 3
0 3/ 0
0 3 5
0
48 CR.ORG that vehicles with those systems are designed, deployed, and marketed safely. Please heed all warnings and keep your hands on the wheel.
Used Car
Winners &
Losers
We’ve analyzed the data from our extensive
tests and from hundreds of thousands of vehicles
in our owner surveys to come up with this list
of the used cars that you can count on and those
to avoid at all costs.
BUYING PREOWNED is more than just a great way

to save money—it could get you into a car that has safety HOW WE RATE USED CARS and performed well in our road
tests—when tested as new cars—for
and luxury features you couldn’t afford in a new car. Best Used We selected the top the years shown. We’ve also high-
That’s why this year we’re including used models that cost 2007 to 2016 models based on lighted in green our very top picks,
subscriber responses to our Annual models that have much-better-than-
up to $30,000. A year or two ago these models might Reliability Survey, then cross- average reliability for most years.
have set you back $50,000, but today their safety features referenced those metrics with the Worst Used Each of these
availability of electronic stability 2007 to 2016 models has a record
are still up-to-date and they may have many years of control, a key safety feature that of well-below-average reliability.
reliable service left. What’s more, when it comes to became standard in 2012. These We advise taking a detour away
cars have above-average reliability from them.
savings, used cars not only are less expensive from the
get-go but also can cost less in taxes. Our “CR’s Best Used
Car Choices” and “Worst Used Cars” lists will guide Try our online used-car marketplace. Log on to search
used-car listings near you, augmented with CR reliability
you to smart options and help you steer clear of those that
ratings, allowing you to focus on vehicles that are known for
are likely to be troublesome. LEARN their good reliability. Go to CR.org/usedcarmarketplace.
ILLUSTRATION BY PATRICK HRUBY APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 49

Ratings CR’s Best Used Cars These 98 reliable models have key safety features, including electronic stability control (ESC),
so you can make a wise choice that meets your budget and your needs. Models highlighted in
green performed well in our testing when new and have multiple years of better-than-average reliability.
Prices ESC (’07-16) Prices ESC (’07-16)

Make & Model $5K- $10K- $15K- $20K- $25K- Opt. Std. Make & Model $5K- $10K- $15K- $20K- $25K- Opt. Std.
$10K $15K $20K $25K $30K From From $10K $15K $20K $25K $30K From From
CARS: SUBCOMPACT CARS: LUXURY
Honda Fit ’07-11 ’12-13 ’16 – – ’09 ’11 Acura ILX – – ’13 ’16 – – All
Hyundai Accent ’12 ’13-14 – – – – ’12 Acura TL – ’07-09 ’10 ’13 ’14 – All
Nissan Versa
’09, ’12 – – – – ’10 ’12 Acura TSX – ’07-10 ’11-13 – – – All
Hatchback
Nissan Versa Note – ’15 – – – – All Buick LaCrosse – – – ’14-15 – – All
Toyota Prius C – ’12-14 – – – – All Buick Regal – – ’14 ’15 – – All
Toyota Yaris ’07-10 – – – – – ’10 Buick Verano – ’12-13 ’14-15 – – – All
Cadillac CTS – – ’11 ’13 – – All

CARS: COMPACT
Hyundai Genesis – ’09 – ’13 – – All
Ford Focus ’08, ’11 – – – – ’09 ’10
Infiniti G – ’07-09 ’10-11 ’13 – – All
Honda Civic ’07-11 ’12-14 ’15 – – ’09 ’12
Infiniti M – ’07-08 – ’11-12 ’13 – All
Hyundai Elantra ’07-09 ’14-15 – – – ’08 ’11
Lexus CT 200h – – ’11-12 ’13, ’15 – – All
Kia Forte ’10 ’14 – – – – All
Lexus ES – ’07-09 ’10-11 ’12-13 ’14 – All
Kia Soul ’10-11 ’13-14 – – – – All
Lexus GS – ’07 ’08 – ’13 – All
Mazda3 ’08-12 ’13-14 ’15 – – ’07 ’11
Lexus HS Hybrid – ’10 – – – – All
Nissan Leaf ’11-12 ’13-14 ’15 – – – All
Lexus IS – – ’08, ’10 ’11-12 – – All
Pontiac Vibe ’07-10 – – – – ’07 ’09
Lexus LS – – – ’07 ’10 – All
Scion xB – ’12 – – – – All
Lincoln MKZ ’08-09 ’11-12 – ’15 – – ‘09
Subaru Impreza – ’11 ’14 ’16 – ’08 ’09
Mercedes-Benz
Toyota Corolla ’07-11 ’12-14 ’15-16 – – ’07 ’10 – ’08 – ’13 ’14 – All
C-Class
‘07-08, Mercedes-Benz
Toyota Matrix – – – – ‘07 ‘10 – ’08 – ’10-12 ’13 – All
‘10 E-Class
Toyota Prius ’07-09 ’10-12 ’13-15 ’16 – ’07 ’10 Volvo S60 – – ’12 ’13-14 – – All
CARS: MIDSIZED AND LARGE SPORTS CARS
Chevrolet Malibu – ’12 ’14-15 – – ’08 ’09 Chevrolet Corvette – – – ’07-08 – – All
Ford Fusion ’07-09 ’12 ’15-16 – – ’09 ’10 Mazda MX-5 Miata – ’07-11 ’12-13 – ’16 ’07 ’12
Honda Accord ’07 ’08-12 ’13-14 ’15-16 – ’07 ’08 WAGONS AND MINIVANS
Honda Accord
Hyundai Azera ’08 – ’12-13 ’14 – – All – – ’10 ’12-13 – – All
Crosstour, Crosstour
Hyundai Sonata ’08-09 ’13-14 – – – – All Honda Odyssey – ’09-10 – – – – All
Kia Optima – – ’13-14 ’16 – – All Mazda5 – ’12-13 ’14 – – – ’10
Mazda6 ’09-10 – ’14 ’15-16 – ’07 ’09 Subaru Outback – ’10 ’11-12 ’13-14 – ’07 ’09
Mercury Milan ’07-09 – – – – ’09 ’10 Toyota Prius V – – ’12-13 ’14-16 – – All
Nissan Altima – ’10-12 – – – ’07 ’10 Toyota Sienna – ’09 ’11 ’12-13 ’14 ’07 ’08
Nissan Maxima – ’09 ’12 ’14 – ’07 ’09 Toyota Venza – – ’09-11 ’12-13 ’14-15 – All
Subaru Legacy – ’10-12 ’13-14 – – ’07 ’09

SUVs: SMALL
Toyota Avalon – ’07-10 ’11-12 ’13-14 ’15-16 ’07 ’09
Buick Encore – – ’13-14 ’15-16 – – All
Toyota Camry ’07-08 ’09-12 ’13-14 ‘15-16 – ’07 ’10
BMW X1 – – – ’13-14 – – All
Chevrolet Equinox – – ’13 ’14-15 – – All
GMC Terrain – – – ’13-14 ’15 – All

Make & Model
Prices ESC (’07-16)
Worst Used Cars
$5K- $10K- $15K- $20K- $25K- Opt. Std.
$10K $15K $20K $25K $30K From From Listed alphabetically by make and model, these 108 vehicles
have records of much-worse-than-average reliability,
SUVs: SMALL (Continued) based on subscriber responses to our Annual Auto Survey.
Honda CR-V – ’07-10 ’11-13 ’14-15 ’16 – All
Honda HR-V – – – ’16 – – All

ACURA FIAT MAZDA
Hyundai Tucson ’07 ’10 ’12-13 ’15 – – All TLX ’15-16 500 ’12-13, ’15 Mazda3 ’16
500L ’14 Mazda5 ’08
Kia Sportage – – ’11-12 – – – All AUDI
A3 ’16 FORD MERCEDES-
Mazda CX-5 – – ’13 ’14-15 ’16 – All A4 ’09-10 Escape ’13 BENZ
Q7 ’15 Expedition ’12 C-Class ’15
Nissan Rogue – ’10-12 ’13 ’15-16 – – All
Explorer ’16 GL-Class ’14-15
BMW
Subaru Forester – – ’13 ’14-15 ’16 ’07 ’09 F-250 ’08, ’10, ’14 M-Class ’11
1 Series ’11 GLE ’16
F-350 ’08, ’13
Subaru XV/ 3 Series ’08-11
– – ’13 ’14-16 – – All Fiesta ’11-14 S-Class ’15
Crosstrek
4 Series ’14
Focus ’12-16 MINI
Toyota RAV4 – ’08-09 ’10-12 ’13-14 ’15-16 – All 5 Series ’08, ’12
Mustang ’15-16
X3 ’07-08, ’11 Cooper ’07-11, ‘15
Taurus ’10
SUVs: MIDSIZED AND LARGE X5 ’11-12 Countryman ’12
GMC
Acura MDX – – ’09-10 ’11-12 ’13 – All BUICK NISSAN
Acadia ’07-14
Enclave ’08-11 Juke ’12
Acura RDX – ’07-08 ’10-11 – ’14-15 – All Canyon ’15
LaCrosse ’07 Murano ’16
Sierra 2500HD
Lucerne ’08 Pathfinder ’13-14
Ford Edge – ’10 ’11 – ‘16 – All ’11-12, ’15-16
Rogue ’14
CADILLAC Sierra 3500HD ’15
Ford Flex – – ‘11 – ‘14-15 – All Sentra ’13
ATS ’13, ’15 Terrain ’10-11
Escalade ’15-16 Yukon ’14-16 RAM
Honda Pilot – ’07-08 ’09 ’12 ’14 – All
SRX ’13 Yukon XL ’08, ’14-16 1500 ’14, ’16
Hyundai Santa Fe – – – ’15 ’16 – All 2500 ’12, ’14-15
CHEVROLET HONDA
Hyundai Santa Fe Accord Crosstour ’11 SATURN
– – – ’15-16 – – All Camaro ’13
Sport
Colorado ’15 Civic ’16 Outlook ’07-09
Kia Sorento – – – – ’15 – All Corvette ’16 HYUNDAI SUBARU
Cruze ’11-13
Lexus GX – – – ’08 – – All Genesis ’16 Impreza ’09
Equinox ’10-11
Sonata ’11 Outback ’08
Lexus RX – ’07 ’08-09 ’10-11 ’12-13 – All HHR ’09
WRX/STi ’15
Impala ’10 INFINITI
Lincoln MKX – ’08 – – ’13-14 – All Malibu Limited ’16 JX ’13 TESLA
Silverado 2500HD QX60 ’14 Model S ’14
Mazda CX-9 – ’08 – ’13-14 ’15 – All
’11-12, ’15-16 Model X ’16
JEEP
Mercedes-Benz Silverado 3500HD ’15
– – – ’11 ’14-15 – All Cherokee ’14-15 TOYOTA
GLK-Class
Sonic ’12
Grand Cherokee Tacoma ’16
Nissan Murano – – ’10-11 ’12-13 ’14 ’07 ’09 Suburban ’08, ’14-16
’11, ’13-14, ’16
Tahoe ’14-16 VOLKSWAGEN
Toyota 4Runner – – ‘07-08 ‘10 ‘11-12 – All Liberty ’08
Traverse ’09-11, ’13 Beetle ’14
Renegade ’15
Volt ’16 CC ’10
Toyota Highlander – ’07-08 ’09-10 ’11-12 ’13 – All Wrangler ’07-08, ‘15
CHRYSLER Golf ’10, ’16
Toyota Sequoia – – ’07-08 – – – All KIA Golf SportWagen ’15
200 ’15
Rondo ’09 GTI ’12-13
Volvo XC60 – – – ’11, ’13 – – All 300 ’13-14
LINCOLN Jetta ’10, ’14-16
PT Cruiser ’07-08
Passat ’07, ’14
Town & Country MKC ’15-16
PICKUP TRUCKS Tiguan ’11, ’13
’08-12 MKS ’13
Chevrolet Touareg ’14
– – ’07-08 ’09-10 – ’09 ’10
Silverado 2500HD DODGE
GMC Sierra VOLVO
– – – ’07-09 ’10 ’09 ’10 Challenger ’15
2500HD S60 ’15
Charger ’14-15
Honda Ridgeline – – ’07-09 ’10-12 ’13 – All XC90 ’16
Dart ’13
Durango ’12-13, ’15
Nissan Frontier – – ’10-11 ’12 – ’07 ’12
Grand Caravan ’08-12
Toyota Tacoma – – ’07-09 ’11-13 ’14 ’07 ’09 Journey ’12-13, ’15
Ram 2500 ’07
Toyota Tundra – – ’07-08 ’10-11 ‘12 ‘07 ‘09

New
Car
Profiles
Dig in to detailed reviews from CR’s experts,
key results from our tests, and exclusive
reliability and owner-satisfaction
survey data for 260 new cars, SUVs,
trucks, and minivans.
HOW TO READ tests at government or insurance- Price is the manufacturer’s Reliability is our forecast of how
THE VEHICLE PROFILES industry crash-test facilities. suggested retail price for the vehicle, well a model is likely to hold up,
not including any options or based on our Annual Auto Survey.
! To earn this check mark 0

Recommeded Vehicles Overall Score is a compre- destination charges. An “E” indicates Detailed reliability history charts
76
hensive rating that incorpo- that the price is an estimated one. start on page 86.
from Consumer Reports, a vehicle rates road-test performance, Road-Test Score sums up how Owner Satisfaction is also based
must perform well in our testing, predicted reliability, owner satis- the vehicle performed in our on our Annual Auto Survey, in which
must have average or better faction, and safety results. If a range 50 tests, objective and subjective. we ask subscribers whether they
predicted reliability, and must of numbers is given, that signifies A range of numbers means we would definitely buy or lease their
have performed at least ade- that multiple versions of the vehicle tested multiple powertrains or current vehicle again. The top score
quately if it was included in safety or its powertrain were tested. versions of a vehicle. of 5 indicates that 80 percent or
To stay on top of the latest models as we road-test and/or recommend them, check out our New Cars: A to Z page on Consumer Reports’
website. Overviews are available for everyone; ratings for CRO subscribers. Go to CR.org/carsatoz.
LEARN

1 2 3 4 5 !
Acura ILX
0
Acura’s entry-level
64 compact sedan falls short
of bargain-luxury-sedan
OVERALL standards. The sole
SCORE
powertrain is a 2.4-liter
four-cylinder and an eight-speed
automated manual transmission. Acura PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
failed to address the stiff, jumpy ride, $27,990-$34,980 61
and handling is more mundane than Reliability 4 Satisfaction 1 MPG 28
sporty but ultimately secure. Road
noise is incessant, and the transmission makes the car hesitate off the line.
Once underway, the gearbox feels reluctant to downshift, lugging the engine
when you need power. The lack of lumbar support for the driver’s seat is
another knock, the infotainment system is not very intuitive, and the car’s low
owner-satisfaction score is noteworthy. Available safety features include
automatic emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, and lane-keep assist.
Acura MDX !
0
0
This functional, family-
73 friendly luxury SUV is
comfortable, quick, and
OVERALL quiet, with generous space
SCORE
for seven. The second row
folds and slides forward with the touch
of a button for easy access to the small PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
third row. The 3.5-liter V6 is silky smooth $43,950-$58,450 79
and delivers ample acceleration. We Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 21
measured a very commendable 21 mpg
overall, but the nine-speed automatic is not always smooth or responsive and
its push-button shifter is unintuitive to use. We also found it frustrating to use
the dual-screen control interface. The MDX has a comfortable ride, and the
cabin is quiet. Handling is mundane, but it’s ultimately secure. The 2017
freshening brings a hybrid version with a seven-speed automated manual,
as well as standard AcuraWatch, which includes safety features such as
automatic emergency braking and lane-departure warning.
Acura RDX !
0
0
Derived from the
72 previous-generation
Honda CR-V, the RDX has
OVERALL a more premium feel to
SCORE
compete among compact
luxury SUVs. The very smooth and
refined V6 gets 22 mpg overall, which PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
is on par with the turbocharged four- $35,370-$43,420 75
cylinder engines found in competing Reliability 4 Satisfaction 3 MPG 22
SUVs. Handling is not especially agile,
and the ride is a little stiff. We also found that the front wheels can easily spin
on wet pavement before the AWD system transfers power to the rear wheels.
Despite recent updates, the interior is rather forgettable for an upscale SUV,
lacking certain luxury features usually found on competitors. Acura’s
convoluted dual-screen control system is unintuitive to use. Still, the seats
are comfortable and the rear seat is roomy. The AcuraWatch safety package
is available on all trims.
more would do so. The lowest highway driving. A range of Acura RLX
score 1 means less
0
numbers for this score Acura’s flagship falls well
than 50 percent would. signifies that we tested mul- 75 short of its competitors
tiple power trains or versions. and misses some of the
1 2 3 4 5 Models that have not been OVERALL
SCORE
key attributes that make
WORSE BETTER tested will have an “NA” up a luxury sedan. The
for overall score, road-test ride is jumpy and unsettled,
MPG represents CR’s assess- score, and fuel-consumption undermining the car’s main mission. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
ment of a recently tested data. An asterisk (*) indicates Lack of handling agility makes the car $54,450-$65,950 75
model’s overall fuel consump- that the rating is based on feel ungainly. A high point is the Reliability 4 Satisfaction 2 MPG 23
tion, based on both city and limited data. responsive 310-hp V6 and six-speed
automatic transmission. Our tested front-wheel-drive model averaged
23 mpg overall. The pricey all-wheel-drive hybrid gets an EPA-rated
29 mpg combined. The spacious cabin is well-made, but it isn’t particularly
luxurious and the overly complicated controls serve as an ergonomics
lesson in what not to do. Safety features such as a surround-view camera
and cross-traffic alert are available.
CR.ORG 53
Profiles
Acura TLX Audi A3
0
The TLX has potential Audi’s A3 is a compelling
57
60 but lacks panache and 69 entry-level luxury car, but
ultimately falls short of it lacks some expected
OVERALL the best luxury compact OVERALL features for its price, and
SCORE SCORE
sedans. It’s available with the interior, although well
either a four- or a six-cylinder engine, made, feels austere. It’s solid and quiet,
but all-wheel drive is available only PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE and has a drum-tight body structure. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
with the V6. The 2.4-liter uses an $31,900-$44,800 75-79 Crisp handling and a firm, controlled $31,176-$48,650 77
eight-speed automated manual that Reliability 1 Satisfaction 3 MPG 25-27 ride make the A3 enjoyable to drive. Reliability 2 Satisfaction 3 MPG 27
delivers quick, direct shifts and We tested it with the now-discontinued
contributes to the very good 27 mpg overall. The V6 is a gem, with plenty 1.8-liter engine, which delivered a respectable 27 mpg in our tests. The cabin
of power, but its nine-speed automatic shifts roughly. Handling is responsive is quiet, and the front seats are comfortable and supportive. The rear seat,
but not sporty, although the ride is quite comfortable. The cabin is quiet, however, is tight. It takes a bit of time to get used to the MMI infotainment
but rear-seat room is so-so. A generous roster of advanced safety systems system, but it ultimately proves logical. It’s easy to hit $40,000 with just a few
includes automatic emergency braking and blind-spot monitors. Reliability options. A sporty S3 with a 292-hp, 2.0-liter turbo; a convertible; and a
has been well below average. hatchback plug-in hybrid are available.
Alfa Romeo 4C Audi A4 !

0
0 0
Alfa’s 4C is a superlight The A4 is our highest-
NA two-seat, midengine 81 ranked sports sedan
sports car for people who based, thanks in part to
OVERALL live more for the track OVERALL its satisfying driving
SCORE SCORE
than their commute. experience. Power comes
Though short on creature comforts, from a 2.0-liter turbocharged
the Alfa’s high points are style, agility, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE four-cylinder, mated to a standard PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
and sound. The 4C is powered by a $55,900-$65,900 NA seven-speed dual-clutch automatic. $37,300-$51,400 88
1.7-liter turbo four-cylinder that cranks Reliability 1* Satisfaction 3* MPG NA The engine is smooth and punchy, Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG 27
out 237 hp and uses a dual-clutch, and the transmission is slick. We got a
six-speed automated manual that can also be shifted manually via paddles commendable 27 mpg overall. Handling is nimble and precise, the ride is
behind the steering wheel. With its featherlike 2,500-pound weight, low supple, and the A4 feels tight-as-a-drum solid, with a very quiet cabin. The
center of gravity, and race car-like weight distribution, the 4C is a pure sports fully digital instrument panel shows pertinent information in front of the
car that’s fun to drive, with superlative handling and a thrilling exhaust note. driver in a clear, comprehensive way, and the center screen is compatible
However, the unassisted steering requires a high effort at low speeds, with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. Interior fit and finish is excellent and
visibility is challenging, and access is arduous. A Spider version is available the front seats are comfortable, although the rear seat is tight. The A4 has
with a removable fabric roof panel. good crash-test results and offers advanced safety features.
Alfa Romeo Giulia Audi A5
0 0
The new Giulia is Alfa’s The 2018 A5 and S5
NA entry in the compact- NA coupe and convertible
luxury-sport-sedan have been redesigned
OVERALL market. The top-trim OVERALL and go on sale this spring.
SCORE SCORE
Quadrifoglio version uses The A5 gets a 252-hp,
a 505-hp, 2.9-liter twin-turbo V6, which 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder matched to
Alfa claims will zip the car from 0 to PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
60 mph in just 3.8 seconds. If you $37,995-$72,000 NA The S5 is powered by a 354-hp, $42,010-$65,000E NA
don’t need all that dash, mainstream Reliability 1* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA 3.0-liter turbo V6 mated to an Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
editions feature a 280-hp, 2.0-liter eight-speed automatic. All-wheel drive
turbo four-cylinder, mated to an eight-speed automatic. Rear- and all-wheel- is standard. The Sportback, a four-door hatchback, will also be available.
drive versions will be available. In our experience with the Ti and Quadrifoglio Standard safety equipment includes forward-collision warning with automatic
versions, the car is nimble and fun to drive. The four adjustable driving braking. The outgoing A5/S5 coupe and convertible have quiet, luxurious
modes allow the driver to alter the Giulia’s character from docile to sporty. cabins. Although snug, the rear seat is one of the best in any convertible. The
The interior has supportive seats and decent rear passenger room. car drives well, with nimble handling and a firm yet supple ride. The
Infotainment functions are handled via a central control knob. Pricing starts convertible is almost devoid of wind buffeting, and you can operate the
at around $40,000, with typically equipped Ti versions selling at $50,000. insulated soft top up to 30 mph.
Alfa Romeo Stelvio Audi A6 !

0
0 0
The first Alfa Romeo SUV, Audi’s A6 has a
NA called Stelvio, will be 84 comfortable ride and
based on the company’s agile handling, strong
OVERALL new Giulia sedan. The OVERALL performance, great seats,
SCORE SCORE
Stelvio is positioned to and excellent fit and
compete with high-end and sporty finish. It’s one of our highest ranked
SUVs such as the Audi Q5, BMW X3, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE sedans and is a perfect long-distance PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
and Porsche Macan. The standard $40,000-$70,000E NA cruiser with a whisper quiet, roomy $47,600-$74,100 90
powertrain is a 280-hp, 2.0-liter Reliability 1* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA cabin. The 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder Reliability 4 Satisfaction 4 MPG 22
four-cylinder turbo. The top works well but has a raspy, less-than-
Quadrifoglio model gets an all-aluminum 505-hp, 2.9-liter twin-turbo V6. Both luxurious engine sound. The 3.0-liter supercharged V6 we tested is
engines are matched to an eight-speed automatic transmission. All-wheel smooth and punchy, and returned a commendable 22 mpg overall. The
drive is standard. Like the Giulia, the interior includes Alcantara seats, carbon front seats are comfortable and supportive, and the rear seat is roomy for
fiber surfaces and a flat-bottomed steering wheel—complete with a red start three adults. An added plus is the large trunk. Although the infotainment
button. The infotainment system takes a page from BMW’s iDrive, with a system’s center controller and screen take some getting used to, the
center controller interfacing with a screen for audio, phone, navigation, and system ultimately proves logical.
other vitals. The Stelvio goes on sale in summer 2017.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Audi A7 Audi Q5
0 0
This stylish hatchback The redesigned Q5 gets
NA version of the A6 is an NA new styling, increased
impressive car, although performance promise,
OVERALL it sacrifices some access, OVERALL and a growing list of
SCORE SCORE
rear-seat room, and advanced safety features.
visibility in exchange for sportiness The new Q is also available with Audi’s
and looks. Its rear hatch and generous PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE Virtual Cockpit, which lets you expand PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
interior give it practicality, room, and $68,800-$129,500 NA the cluster between the instrument $42,000-$55,000E NA
comfort. Handling is responsive and Reliability 4 Satisfaction 5 MPG NA panel’s large gauges into a larger color Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
secure, and the ride is steady though screen that can display audio, phone,
firm, particularly on the optional 20-inch tires. The exquisite interior is navigation, and travel information. The standard audio system includes
very luxurious, and the infotainment system proves logical after a bit of Android Auto and Apple CarPlay compatibility. Like the A4, the Q5 is
familiarization. A midcycle freshening brought tweaks to almost every engine. powered by an updated 252-hp, 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine
The smooth, punchy 3.0-liter supercharged V6 is plenty powerful, and an that is coupled to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission.
even stronger 450-hp, 4.0-liter V8 powers the S7. If you need more gusto, All-wheel drive is standard. Available advanced safety features include
the RS 7’s engine puts out 560 hp. forward-collision warning with automatic braking, blind-spot monitoring,
rear-collision warning, and lane-keep assist.
Audi A8 !
0 Audi Q7 !
0
0 0
Audi’s top-level sedan Audi’s luxury three-row
82 delivers smooth and 90 SUV is an impressive
effortless acceleration yet vehicle, and among the
OVERALL attains commendable fuel OVERALL best we’ve ever tested. It
SCORE SCORE
economy even with employs a supercharged
all-wheel drive. The car handles crisply 3.0-liter V6 that is mated to a very
and holds the road tenaciously, making PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE smooth eight-speed automatic. This PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
it one of the sportiest luxury sedans $82,500-$115,900 91 results in effortless acceleration and $49,000-$64,300 96
we’ve tested. The ride is firm and Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4 MPG 21 fuel economy of 20 mpg overall in our Reliability 5 Satisfaction 5 MPG 20
steady but not as cushy as in the tests. The Q7 is very quiet, instilling a
Mercedes-Benz S-Class. Interior ambience, quality of materials, and sense of tranquility. The ride has an underlying firmness unless you splurge
craftsmanship are top-notch, and the cabin is quiet. The front seats are on the Prestige trim and the optional air suspension, which makes it as
exceptionally comfortable and supportive, with a variety of massage plush as a luxury car. Handling is responsive and confidence-inspiring.
settings. The rear seat is worthy of a limo, but the trunk is a bit small. The beautifully finished interior exudes luxury, with excellent seats and a
The infotainment system takes some getting used to but proves logical. vivid, high-tech digital instrument cluster. The controls prove logical with
The base supercharged V6 has ample power, but the 4.0-liter V8 turbo is a familiarity. Available advanced safety systems include automatic emergency
powerhouse worthy of such a flagship. braking and lane-keep assist.
Audi Allroad Audi TT !

0
0 0
An all-new Allroad is The TT coupe and
NA based on the redesigned 81 convertible use a 220-hp,
A4. Following the same 2.0-liter four-cylinder, and
OVERALL format as before, the OVERALL the TTS features a 292-hp
SCORE SCORE
Allroad features rugged version. The six-speed
styling details and slightly higher ride automated manual transmission swaps
height. The 2.0-liter, turbocharged PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE gears quickly, but some vibration is PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
four-cylinder engine was smooth and $44,000-$51,400 NA noticeable at very low speeds. The car $43,500-$52,500 84
punchy, and the seven-speed Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA feels nimble and entertaining, diving Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG 26
dual-clutch automatic was slick in the into corners with enthusiasm and a
A4 that we tested. Handling is nimble and precise, the ride is supple, and dash of steering feedback. The ride is quite firm but not punishing, and
the A4 feels tight-as-a-drum solid, with a very quiet cabin. A new interface noise is kept at bay. Inside the snug interior is Audi’s digital instrument
for the infotainment system is compatible with Android Auto and Apple panel, which incorporates all gauges and displays, and eliminates the
CarPlay. The Allroad is compelling for buyers who expect more agility and a center-dash screen. HVAC and seat-heat controls are incorporated into
greater level of interior quality than the Subaru Outback offers and are willing the different dash vents. Overall, the TT is more about style and technology
to put up with the Audi’s much higher price and tighter accommodations. than visceral sporty performance.
Audi Q3 !
0 BMW 2 Series !
0
0 0
A tidy, compact This small coupe is
80 crossover, the Q3 92 exhilarating to drive, with
competes with the BMW razor-sharp handling and
OVERALL X1 and Mercedes-Benz OVERALL a sporty feel that is
SCORE SCORE
GLA. Overall, it manages missing in other recent
to deliver a premium driving BMWs. For 2017, the 228i is renamed
experience similar to the Q5 but in a PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE the 230i and comes with a 248-hp, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
10-inch-shorter package. The energetic $31,800-$41,300 77 2.0-liter four-cylinder; the uplevel $33,150-$51,700 98
200-hp, 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder is Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 22 M235i we tested, now named M240i, Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 25
mated to a conventional six-speed has a terrific 320-hp, 3.0-liter turbo
automatic and returned 22 mpg overall in our tests. This is a quiet SUV with six-cylinder that responds instantly to every prod of the throttle. A 365-hp M2
a firm, comfortable ride and responsive handling. The cabin is a bit version with even sportier handling is available. The six-speed manual and
simplistic-looking, but it gives a sense of quality. Demerits include the tight eight-speed automatic transmissions are slick and super-responsive. The
quarters and cramped driving position. The controls are complicated at first, excellent front seats are very supportive, but the rears are very cramped.
but they prove logical with some familiarity. Front- and all-wheel drive are Interior appointments are first-rate, and the iDrive control system is logical
available. Reliability has been much better than average. once mastered. All-wheel drive and a convertible are available. Reliability has
been much better than average.

Profiles
BMW 3 Series !
0 BMW 7 Series !
0
0
The 3 Series has been Among ultraluxury
76
77 freshened for 2017, 85 sedans, the BMW 7 Series
receiving some has always played second
OVERALL suspension tweaks, OVERALL fiddle to the Mercedes-
SCORE SCORE
updated interior touches, Benz S-Class. But the
and a bit more horsepower for the current 7 aced our tests, with an
turbo four-cylinder, which is now PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE impressively steady ride, silky-smooth PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
called the 330i. We got a frugal $33,450-$64,000 86 powertrain, good handling, and $81,500-$153,800 99
26 mpg overall in the all-wheel-drive Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 26-35 a sumptuous cabin. The base 740i Reliability 3* Satisfaction 5 MPG 21
version we tested. Handling has been is powered by a 3.0-liter turbo
sharpened, giving back some of the agility the 3 Series had lost. The firm ride six-cylinder. Our typically equipped 750i, with the polished and punchy
is absorbent but can get choppy. The seats are supercomfortable, and the 445-hp, 4.4-liter turbo V8 and all-wheel drive, rang in at $110,645.
cabin is impeccably furnished. Despite some diesel clatter, the 328d gets a Although the controls have a steep learning curve, they prove logical
standout 35 mpg overall, and its 49 mpg on the highway gives it an once mastered. The luxurious interior is super-quiet, with impeccable
impressive range. You can also opt for a wagon or a less powerful, but more attention to detail and supremely comfortable seats. Interior quality
affordable, 320i. The M3 can give ultra-high-performance cars a run for their is superb, with the wood, leather, suede, and aluminum trim delivering
money. The plug-in hybrid version can cover 14 miles on electric power. a modern ambience without looking glitzy.
BMW 4 Series BMW X1 !

0
0 0
The 4 Series coupe, The X1 relies on a
NA convertible, and four-door 72 platform shared with the
Gran Coupe hatchback Mini Clubman and new
OVERALL based on the 3 Series OVERALL Countryman. Initially
SCORE SCORE
sedans pack in healthy offered only with all-wheel
doses of style, luxury, and exclusivity. drive, for 2017 a less expensive
Lower and wider than the 3 Series, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE front-wheel-drive version joins the line. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
the plush and comfortable 4 Series $42,150-$74,700 NA In our tests of the AWD X1 the $33,100-$35,100 74
is more of a grand touring car rather Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG NA responsive 228-hp, 2.0-liter turbo Reliability 4 Satisfaction 3 MPG 26
than a pure sportster. Yet it is quite four-cylinder engine returned 26 mpg
capable. Handling is lithe, the ride is steady, and the interior is luxuriant. overall. With a relatively low ride height, it feels almost like driving a BMW
The turbocharged, 2.0-liter four-cylinder is sparing with fuel; the 3.0- sedan. Although capable and responsive, ride and handling aren’t up to
liter, six-cylinder turbo is supersmooth and delivers effortless punch. BMW’s high standards. Road noise is rather noticeable. The interior is typical
All-wheel drive is optional. The convertible version uses a retractable BMW, with high-quality materials and switches, buttons, and knobs. The front
hardtop that can be operated at slow speeds. The ultra-high-performance seats are rather short and flat, however, and rear-seat passengers hit their
M4 is a track-ready version. shins against the backs for the front seats. Prices start at an inviting $33,100,
but a typically equipped X1 easily breaks the $40,000 mark.
BMW 5 Series BMW X3 !

0
0 0
BMW focused on adding This is one of the best
NA technology and on 72 upscale SUVs, melding
sharpening the handling utility with luxury-car
OVERALL of the 2017 5 Series OVERALL attributes and driving fun.
SCORE SCORE
redesign. The midsized It has precise handling
luxury sedan is essentially the same and a composed ride, although the
size as the outgoing model, but BMW PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE body tends to rock side to side on PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
says it’s lighter by 220 pounds and the $51,200-$72,100 NA uneven pavement. The 2.0-liter turbo $39,250-$47,950 82
rear seat and the trunk are marginally Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA four-cylinder returned a very good Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 23
roomier. Engines include a 2.0-liter 23 mpg overall, and the eight-speed
turbo four-cylinder with 248 hp in the 530i and a 335-hp, 3.0-liter turbo automatic shifts seamlessly. But this engine is a bit short on refinement, with
six-cylinder in the 540i, both mated to an eight-speed automatic transmission. a diesel-like clatter. The six-cylinder in the 35i is silky smooth. The interior is
All-wheel drive is optional but standard on the V8-powered 550i. A 530e beautifully finished, with firm and supportive front seats, and though the rear
plug-in hybrid goes on sale in April and commands a price premium of just seat is roomy, cargo capacity is modest. Once mastered, the iDrive control
$200 over the 530i. BMW’s gesture control, which lets occupants wave their system proves logical. Despite the X3’s price, the must-have rearview camera
hands to operate certain control functions, is optional. Available active safety is optional. A diesel and rear-drive versions are available.
systems include forward-collision warning and lane-keep assist.
BMW 6 Series BMW X4
0 0
Based on the outgoing Emphasizing sport over
NA 5 Series, this sleek grand NA utility, the X4 is a
tourer comes as a coupelike variant of the
OVERALL two-door coupe or OVERALL X3. It’s agile, rides tautly,
SCORE SCORE
convertible, as well as the and has a beautifully
four-door Gran Coupe version. Power trimmed cabin. Seating is a bit lower
comes from a 3.0-liter turbocharged PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE than in the X3, which instills a more PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
six-cylinder or a 4.4-liter V8, mated to $77,600-$122,500 NA sporty experience. Cargo and rear-seat $45,250-$57,800 NA
either an eight-speed automatic or a Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4 MPG NA space under the sloping roofline is Reliability 3* Satisfaction 3* MPG NA
seven-speed automated manual in the considerably smaller than in the X3,
M6. The V8 delivers ferocious acceleration and an invigorating exhaust note. making the X4 a less practical SUV. Engine choices are a 240-hp, 2.0-liter
But the gear selector in the M6 is unintuitive. Handling is much sharper than turbo four-cylinder and a 3.0-liter turbo six-cylinder that is particularly
the 5 Series, making the big coupe more of a driver’s car than its progenitor. smooth and powerful. An eight-speed automatic transmission and all-wheel
The M version is even more performance-oriented. It’s quick, capable, and drive are standard. In our brief time with the X4 we found that the optional
enjoyable to drive. 19-inch tires make the ride a bit too jiggly. A higher-performance M40i uses
a 355-hp version of the turbo six-cylinder.
56 CR.ORG that vehicles with these systems are designed, deployed, and marketed safely. Please heed all warnings and keep your hands on the wheel.
1 2 3 4 5 !
BMW X5 !
0 Buick Enclave !
0
0 0
The X5 delivers After almost a decade on
72 refinement, comfort, and 74 the market, the large
a high-quality interior Enclave is set to be
OVERALL laden with technology. Its OVERALL replaced by an all-new
SCORE SCORE
3.0-liter turbo six-cylinder, version. The outgoing
paired to a silky-smooth eight-speed model has a firm, comfortable ride and
automatic, supplies effortless PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE secure handling. The cabin is quiet, the PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
acceleration and a good 21 mpg $55,500-$98,800 84 interior is nicely finished, and the seats $39,065-$49,625 77
overall. In our tests we found the ride Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 21 are comfortable. But the Enclave Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 15
to be steady, with handling responsive shows its age through some of the
and secure. The interior is super-quiet and impeccably finished, but the outdated controls and limited feature content. The 3.6-liter V6 engine and
third-row seat is suitable only for kids. BMW’s iDrive infotainment system has six-speed automatic transmission are smooth and unobtrusive, but the
become more intuitive and, with familiarity, proves logical. Optional safety engine feels taxed and at times the powertrain has to work hard to move this
systems, such as automatic emergency braking, are comprehensive. large SUV. In our tests the Enclave returned a paltry 15 mpg overall. Adults
A 4.4-liter V8 and a diesel are available. A plug-in hybrid with a 2.0-liter can fit in the roomy third row, a plus. Forward-collision warning and
twin-turbo four-cylinder can drive on electric power for short distances. lane-departure warning systems are available.
BMW X6 Buick Encore !

0
0 0
This coupelike sporty SUV Derived from the small
NA is a derivative on the 71 Chevrolet Sonic, this
capable X5, which is a subcompact SUV feels
OVERALL good place to start. Unlike OVERALL relatively posh, with a
SCORE SCORE
its sibling, the X6’s styling well-finished, quiet cabin
severely hampers rear visibility, cabin and a ride that’s better than certain
access, and cargo room. More than PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE bigger SUVs. On the downside, the PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
just a new body, though, the X6 is $61,400-$102,200 NA little 1.4-liter turbo four-cylinder and $24,365-$31,965 69
sportier than the X5, with tauter Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA six-speed automatic deliver plodding Reliability 4 Satisfaction 3 MPG 23
handling and a stiffer ride. Most acceleration and just fair fuel economy.
versions are powered by a 3.0-liter turbocharged six-cylinder, which returned The Encore’s tidy size makes it easy to maneuver, and its handling is sound
21 mpg overall in our tested X5. A 4.4-liter turbocharged V8 is also offered. but unexceptional. The interior is narrow and cramped, and the swoopy
The interior is luxurious and well-crafted, and the seats are supportive for styling intrudes on the view aft. A more powerful Sport Touring version is also
long trips. The infotainment system takes time to master but ultimately available. Reliability has been above average.
proves logical. A rear-wheel-drive version is available, as is a high-
performance M version that commands a six-figure price.
BMW i3 !
0 Buick Envision
0 0
BMW’s electric car is Buick’s entry into the
71 a rear-wheel-drive, 66 luxury compact SUV
four-seat hatchback with segment sits between the
OVERALL rear-hinged back doors. OVERALL tiny Encore and giant
SCORE SCORE
The interior is striking Enclave. The new
in its simplicity and style, which is China-built Envision uses a smooth and
reminiscent of Scandinavian furniture. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE quiet 252-hp, 2.0-liter turbocharged PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
The electric motor produces the $42,400-$47,450 79 four-cylinder mated to a six-speed $34,065-$45,335 67
equivalent of 170 hp, which makes this Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 139 automatic transmission. Handling is Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG 21
tall, narrow car feel quick. An optional clumsy and the brakes are mushy, but
two-cylinder engine, which acts as an onboard generator rather than a ultimately the car is secure when pushed to its limits. Oddly, the ride is a
primary power source, extends the range beyond the typical 75 miles to mixed bag; it’s soft and unsettled, yet it allows impacts to punch through.
about 130 miles total. Charge times are about 4 hours with a 240-volt Wind noise is pronounced. The interior is well-finished and features a
connection. In our tests we measured the electric equivalent of 139 mpg. relatively roomy rear seat. Buick’s available safety equipment includes
Despite its tall stance the i3 is very agile and easy to maneuver, though the automatic emergency braking, lane-keeping assist, and blind-spot
ride is quite firm. It takes time to get used to the pronounced deceleration monitoring. A less expensive 2.5-liter four-cylinder and front-wheel-drive
when lifting off the accelerator pedal. versions are available for the 2017 model year.
Buick Cascada Buick LaCrosse !

0
0 0
The front-wheel-drive Buick’s flagship sedan
60 Cascada is a well- 78 delivers what you’d
thought-out, four-seat, expect. The new LaCrosse
OVERALL soft-top convertible that OVERALL rides comfortably and
SCORE SCORE
keeps wind buffeting to a features a well-trimmed
minimum. The ride is steady but can and quiet cabin with a spacious rear
be a bit stiff because of the standard PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE seat. Paired with an eight-speed PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
20-inch tires. Handling is responsive, $33,065-$37,885 53 automatic, the smooth 3.6-liter V6 $32,065-$43,265 85
but power is modest and fuel economy Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG 22 supplies plenty of power and a decent Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG 24
isn’t great. The leather seats are 24 mpg overall. The LaCrosse is one of
supportive, but it’s a long reach to access the touch-screen infotainment the few offerings in the large-sedan class that is available with all-wheel drive.
system, and the center dash is a mess of buttons. The power-operated, fully Handling is responsive but not sporty. The ride is cushy and absorbent, but
insulated fabric roof takes 17 seconds to open and can be operated when we would skip the optional 20-inch tires, which transmit too much harshness
the car is traveling at speeds up to 31 mph. Rear-seat access is made easier to the passengers. Cabin access and visibility are compromised by the car’s
by front seats that power-slide forward. Opting for the Premium trim brings low stance. Most controls are easy to use, including the IntelliLink touch-
advanced safety equipment including forward-collision warning and screen infotainment system, but the unintuitive shifter proves maddening.
lane-departure warning. Advanced electronic safety features are available only on high-end trims.

Profiles
Buick Regal !
0 Cadillac Escalade
0 0
This well-honed and The Escalade falls down
81 satisfying sports sedan 44 on the fundamentals as a
has a European feel, luxury SUV; it rides too
OVERALL thanks to its Opel roots. It OVERALL stiffly and can’t stop or
SCORE SCORE
is the antithesis of the handle with the grace of
whitewall-tired Buick of old. With its its peers. Despite casting a massive
agile handling, quick steering, and a PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE shadow, the Cadillac is not even that PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
taut, steady ride, the Regal is one of $27,065-$36,540 83 roomy inside. The second-row seats $73,395-$97,795 61
Buick’s best offerings. The 259-hp, Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 24 aren’t very comfortable, and the third Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 16
2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder delivers row is cramped. For those who want
strong performance and 24 mpg overall. High-quality materials are used more room, a longer ESV version that provides more cargo space is available.
throughout the cabin. The front seats are firm and supportive, though the The Cue infotainment system is confounding. The real strength of the
rear seat is quite snug. The large trunk is a bonus. Infotainment system Escalade lies in its work abilities, with a powerful 420-hp V8 and impressive
controls are mostly simple, and all-wheel drive is available on all trim lines. tow capacity. Reliability has been well below average, ranking worst in class.
Overall, this is a highly capable yet understated car. The GS is a sportier We consider a well-trimmed Chevrolet Suburban or GMC Yukon XL to be a
version with a tauter suspension. A redesign is imminent. smarter buy.
Cadillac ATS Cadillac XT5
0 0
Offered in rear- or The XT5 is Cadillac’s new
60 all-wheel drive, the ATS 67 luxury crossover and
has nimble, capable replaces the heavy and
OVERALL handling and sharp OVERALL dated SRX. It’s powered
SCORE SCORE
steering that makes it a by a new 3.6-liter V6
treat to drive. The 2.0-liter turbo is paired with an eight-speed automatic.
quick, but it doesn’t feel all that PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE Despite decent measured acceleration, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
powerful and got just 23 mpg overall $34,595-$62,895 79 it feels a bit lethargic in everyday $38,995-$62,500 76
when we tested it with the old Reliability 1 Satisfaction 2 MPG 23 driving. Cadillac’s convoluted Cue Reliability 3* Satisfaction 5 MPG 20
six-speed automatic, which has been infotainment system is a little more
supplanted by a better eight-speed unit. A smooth, refined 3.6-liter V6 is also manageable, but the unintuitive gear selector is maddening. A rear-camera
available. The ride is taut, and braking is excellent. However, the Cue system that displays in the rearview mirror comes on top versions. The XT5
infotainment system, with its flush buttons, is very convoluted and frustrating handles soundly, though the ride is too stiff unless you opt for the active
to use. The interior is well-finished but very snug, particularly in the back. The damping suspension that comes on top-trim versions. Occupants are treated
high-performance ATS-V gets a 464-hp twin-turbo V6, and a two-door coupe to a quiet cabin, supportive seats, and impressive cabin fit and finish.
is also available. Reliability has remained well below average.
Cadillac CT6 !
0 Cadillac XTS !
0
0 0
Cadillac’s new flagship fits This large sedan has a
81 above the CTS and is 77 beautifully executed
priced to compete with interior, perfect for limo
OVERALL the luxury-midsized OVERALL duty. The XTS is roomy,
SCORE SCORE
crowd. This large sedan luxurious, and quiet
possesses some athletic chops and inside, with comfortable seats. It
feels lively to drive. The firm ride is PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE comes as either front-wheel drive or PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
steady, controlled, and compliant, and $53,495-$87,495 95 all-wheel drive. But the ride feels too $45,295-$72,395 82
the interior is very quiet. The base Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG 22 ordinary for a luxury car, and handling Reliability 4 Satisfaction 3 MPG 22
engine is a turbo-four, but most buyers isn’t sporty. The 3.6-liter V6 powertrain
will opt for the midlevel nonturbo V6; the top trim carries a 404-hp lacks finesse, mostly because of its coarse sound when prodded. Still,
twin-turbocharged V6. The eight-speed automatic is smooth and responsive. it ultimately performs well and returns a respectable 22 mpg overall.
All-wheel drive comes standard with the V6s. The interior is plush and roomy, The unintuitive Cue infotainment system is frustrating to use, and the
but cabin storage is scant. Front-seat comfort is superb, but the rear seat high rear deck impedes the view aft. A V-Sport version with a twin-turbo
is a bit short on thigh support. Despite improvements, the updated 3.6-liter engine gives the XTS V8-like power. Reliability has improved
Cue infotainment system is still unintuitive. A plug-in hybrid version with to above average.
an estimated 30 miles of EV range arrives this spring.
Cadillac CTS Chevrolet Bolt
0 0
The CTS is a midsized Chevrolet has equipped
71 luxury sedan with a firm, NA the new Bolt with an
absorbent ride and EPA-rated range of
OVERALL precise handling that OVERALL 238 miles, which is
SCORE SCORE
crowns it as one of the impressive for a small
sportiest cars in the class. But as electric vehicle. The Bolt is built around
satisfying as it is to drive, the CTS can PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE a large 60-kWh battery pack that forms PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
also be frustrating, partly because of $45,560-$85,595 83 much of the car’s floor. This helps $36,620-$40,905 NA
the overly complex Cue infotainment Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 22 contribute to the car’s planted Reliability 3* Satisfaction 5* MPG NA
system. The cabin is luxurious, with feel despite its tall stance. With
impressive material quality. But rear-seat room is relatively snug, and the 200 electrified horses on tap, this small hatchback accelerates with gusto.
trunk is a bit small. Neither the four-cylinder turbo nor the 3.6-liter V6 is as A full charge can take 9 hours on a 240-volt connector. The ride is firm yet
refined as the best in class. The high-end V-Sport is a treat to drive, with compliant and composed, making the Bolt feel solid and substantial. The
effortless thrust. The high-performance CTS-V gives any $100,000 German elaborate instrumentation and well-designed infotainment system are pluses.
super-sedan a run for its money, thanks to the 640-hp, 6.2-liter supercharged But interior ambience falls short of the levels found in the VW eGolf and Ford
V8 from the Corvette Z06 and trackworthy handling and braking. Focus EV. Pricing starts at $36,620, before federal tax incentives of $7,500.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Chevrolet Camaro !
0 Chevrolet Equinox
0 0
The current Camaro is The new Equinox has
76 lighter, shorter, narrower, NA tidier dimensions,
and lower than the bringing it in line with the
OVERALL previous generation, OVERALL small-SUV segment
SCORE SCORE
and these benefits pay dominated by the Toyota
dividends in the car’s impressive RAV4 and Honda CR-V. On sale this
handling agility and sharp steering. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE spring, the Equinox packs the latest PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
The optional magnetic ride suspension $26,305-$69,135 85 infotainment and safety technology, $23,580-$36,400 NA
impressively keeps the car planted. Reliability 3* Satisfaction 5 MPG 20 and two small-displacement Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
The manual shifter has light, precise turbocharged engines, plus a diesel
throws. Base models use a 275-hp turbo four-cylinder, and the new 3.6-liter choice that’s promised to deliver an estimated 40 mpg on the highway.
V6 makes 335 hp. For the SS, Chevrolet dropped in the ferocious 6.2-liter V8 Power comes from a 170-hp 1.5-liter mated to a six-speed automatic; the
from the Corvette. All use a six-speed manual or an eight-speed automatic. uplevel engine is a 252-hp, 2.0-liter four mated to a nine-speed automatic.
The higher-quality interior features the easy-to-use MyLink infotainment The MyLink infotainment system will be offered in 7- and 8-inch forms,
system. Visibility is atrocious, and rear-seat room is extremely tight. A each with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay compatibility. Forward-collision
performance ZL1 version arrives as a 2017 model with a 640-hp, 6.2-liter V8 warning with low-speed automatic braking, blind-spot warning, and rear
supercharged engine and available 10-speed automatic. cross-traffic alert will be offered.
Chevrolet Colorado Chevrolet Impala !

0
0
GM’s small pickups, the Our top scoring large
56
57 Colorado and its GMC 84 sedan, the Impala is
Canyon twin, are more roomy, comfortable,
OVERALL maneuverable than OVERALL quiet, and enjoyable to
SCORE SCORE
full-sized trucks and drive. It even rides like a
better equipped than their Nissan and luxury sedan, feeling cushy and
Toyota competitors. We tested the V6, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE controlled. Engine choices include a PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
which returned 18 mpg overall, and the $20,055-$35,930 67-69 punchy 3.6-liter V6 and an adequate $27,060-$35,440 91
four-cylinder diesel, which got 24 mpg Reliability 2 Satisfaction 3 MPG 18-24 2.5-liter four-cylinder, both paired with Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 22
overall. The ride is rather choppy, as a six-speed automatic. In our tests, the
expected of a pickup, but handling is responsive. Rear- and four-wheel-drive V6 returned 22 mpg overall and had good acceleration. Braking is capable,
versions are available, as are extended and crew-cab body styles. Inside are and handling is secure and responsive. The full-featured cabin stays very
the latest electronics, including the MyLink audio system. These are the first quiet and features a sumptuous backseat. Controls are intuitive and easy to
small trucks to offer forward-collision and lane-departure warnings. In use, but rear visibility is restricted. Advanced electronic safety features are
addition, a backup camera is standard. New for 2017 are an eight-speed readily available. Recent updates include the addition of Apple CarPlay
automatic transmission and an updated, more responsive V6. Reliability has capability and wireless cell-phone charging.
been below average.
Chevrolet Corvette !
0 Chevrolet Malibu !
0
0
The sharp-edged Swoopy styling and
75
83 Corvette has abundant 76 modern powertrains are
power from its 455-hp, highlights of Chevrolet’s
OVERALL 6.2-liter V8 and an interior OVERALL redesigned Malibu. The
SCORE SCORE
worthy of the price. A new car is competitive
seven-speed manual is standard, with among midsized sedans, with a quiet
an eight-speed automatic optional. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE cabin and easy-to-use controls. In tests PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
Drivers with a thirst for more power $55,490-$92,394 92 we found the Malibu to be quiet, with a $22,555-$30,920 79-80
can opt for the 650-hp Z06. The car’s Reliability 3 Satisfaction 5 MPG 20 comfortable ride and responsive Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 29-41
all-aluminum construction optimizes handling. Two four-cylinder turbo
weight savings and strength. Whether in coupe or convertible form, engines are offered: a 1.5-liter with a six-speed automatic—which got 29 mpg in
acceleration is blisteringly quick and handling is pinpoint. With the adjustable our tests—and a more powerful and refined 2.0-liter backed by an eight-speed
driving modes the car can be a fairly refined cruiser or track-ready race car. automatic. A new hybrid, utilizing some of the Chevrolet Volt’s technology, is
The seats deliver support and comfort. But you can’t ignore the low-slung also available. It got an impressive 41 mpg overall in our tests. Up front is a
cabin, which requires almost acrobatic skills to access; the vague manual roomy, comfortable cockpit and an updated version of Chevrolet’s MyLink
shifter; and the omnipresent tire noise. Reliability has improved to average. infotainment system. But the cloth seats are a bit short on support. The rear
seat is roomy, so long-legged passengers can stretch out.
Chevrolet Cruze !
0 Chevrolet SS
0 0
The redesigned Cruze You can think of the
78 possesses big-car 74 seemingly nondescript SS
qualities such as a as a stealth weapon: A
OVERALL comfortable ride and a OVERALL serious performance car
SCORE SCORE
quiet interior. The cloaked in an innocuous
standard engine is an unobtrusive exterior with a spacious, comfortable
1.4-liter four-cylinder turbo mated to a PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE cabin. Its ferocious speed, sporty PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
six-speed automatic transmission. A $16,975-$23,945 77 handling, and fantastic brakes keep $46,575 87
smooth start-stop feature reduces fuel Reliability 5 Satisfaction 3 MPG 30 pace with many high-end sports Reliability 2* Satisfaction 5 MPG 17
use during idling; we got 30 mpg sedans. The rear-drive SS comes fully
overall in our tests. A new infotainment system featuring Android Auto and loaded and is powered by a burbling 415-hp, 6.2-liter V8 from the last-
Apple CarPlay mirrors some of your smartphone icons on the screen. The generation Corvette. Fuel economy isn’t its forte: We got a paltry 17 mpg
rear seat is relatively roomy for the class, but the front seats are short on overall with the automatic. Controls are simple, and standard safety gear
lower-back support. A variety of advanced active safety features are available, includes forward-collision warning, lane-departure warning, blind-spot
but only on the top-trim Premier version. First-year reliability of the redesign monitoring, and rear cross-traffic alert. The firm but tolerable ride is a modest
has been well above average. A hatchback version is new for 2017, and a drawback for this kind of performance. A six-speed manual is available.
1.6-liter turbodiesel will arrive down the road.

Profiles
Chevrolet Silverado Chevrolet Suburban

1500
0 0
If you need space for
65 The Silverado and similar 54 seven or more people, all
GMC Sierra have relatively their stuff, and towing
OVERALL
responsive handling and a
OVERALL capacity to boot, few
SCORE SCORE
roomy cabin that is as SUVs other than the
quiet as a luxury car’s. Cabin access is Suburban will do. This behemoth
easy, controls simple, and towing and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE has a sumptuous and quiet interior, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
$26,105-$53,645 80 power-folding second- and third- $47,595-$64,700 74
payload capacities generous. Fuel
economy from the 5.3-liter V8 crew Reliability 2 Satisfaction 3 MPG 16 row seats, and available blind-spot Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 16
cab we tested was 16 mpg overall, but monitoring and cross-traffic alert.
the truck feels sluggish. Other available engines are a 4.3-liter V6 and Beyond that, it’s pretty much your standard hauler, with a 5.3-liter V8 mated
powerful 6.2-liter V8. Some shortcomings include a jittery ride and front seats to a six-speed automatic and a respectable 16 mpg overall. The touch-screen
that aren’t as supportive as those in certain competitors. More versions now infotainment system is easy to use, and the magnetic ride suspension on LTZ
get the eight-speed automatic, which should improve engine response. Other trims improves ride comfort and handling response and capability. Recent
changes include available automatic emergency braking and the addition of updates include available lane-keeping assist, plus Apple CarPlay. Reliability
Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. Reliability has remained below average. has been well below average.
Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD Chevrolet Tahoe
0 0
The HD Silverado and its The Tahoe has a luxurious
NA twin, the GMC Sierra HD, 51 and quiet interior, but the
are designed for heavy ride is too stiff and the
OVERALL towing and hauling. The OVERALL third-row seat is tight. In
SCORE SCORE
6.0-liter V8 and 6.6-liter addition, the 5.3-liter V8
turbodiesel are both mated to a and six-speed automatic combine to
six-speed automatic. The latter works PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE form a lackluster powertrain that PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
well and employs a heavy-duty $32,995-$56,935 NA returned 16 mpg overall. The $44,895-$62,000 67
Allison-made transmission. A Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 14 touch-screen infotainment system is Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 16
natural-gas version of the 6.0-liter V8 is easy to use, and the front seats are
also available. The LTZ trim has a luxurious cabin. If you don’t plan to go very comfortable. The Magnetic Ride Control suspension on LTZ trims
off-road, the Z71 suspension is superfluous—it severely degrades ride improves ride comfort, as well as handling response and capability. Properly
comfort. These HD pickups are the better choice for commercial snow- equipped versions can tow 8,500 pounds. But if towing isn’t your main
plowing duties. Available safety features include forward-collision warning, concern, car-based SUVs drive better and are roomier. Lane-keeping assist is
lane-departure warning, and front and rear park assist. Android Auto and now available, joining the already-available blind-spot monitoring and
Apple CarPlay are compatible with the infotainment system. cross-traffic alert systems. Reliability has been well below average.
Chevrolet Sonic !
0 Chevrolet Traverse !
0
0 0
The Chevrolet Sonic After almost a decade,
64 hatchback and sedan 76 the three-row Traverse is
possess a relatively getting a redesign for
OVERALL comfortable ride and a OVERALL 2018. It’s based on the
SCORE SCORE
quiet cabin for a same platform as the new
subcompact. Fuel economy of 28 mpg GMC Acadia but is longer. The current
overall is nothing to boast about. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE Traverse is showing its age: It has PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
Handling is secure but a bit twitchy $14,200-$21,485 66 outdated controls and thirst for fuel, $30,995-$43,935 77
because of the overly quick steering. Reliability 3 Satisfaction 2 MPG 28 with 16 mpg overall. The Acadia we Reliability 4 Satisfaction 3 MPG 16
The sedan has a large trunk; the hatch tested impressed, with a quiet interior;
offers more utility. Creature comforts such as keyless entry and push-button steady, composed ride; and responsive handling. The 3.6-liter V6 supplies
start, and optional heated seats and steering wheel bring some maturity to ample power. The infotainment system is comprehensive and intuitive. Like
the subcompact. A standard 7-inch touch screen is backed by Android Auto the Acadia, the new Traverse will have a rear-seat minder to ensure that no
and Apple CarPlay. A rear camera is standard and on the safety front, optional infants are left behind. Maximum seating capacity is eight, but most versions
forward-collision warning and lane-departure warning are welcome additions. will be seven-passenger configurations with second-row captain chairs.
The new Traverse goes on sale in the summer.
Chevrolet Spark Chevrolet Trax
0 0
With a slightly longer This bite-sized crossover,
50 wheelbase and lower roof, 62 essentially a stripped-
the redesigned Spark down Buick Encore, is an
OVERALL looks less goofy. Power OVERALL ambitiously priced
SCORE SCORE
comes from a 98-hp, budget model. Available
1.4-liter four-cylinder that delivers in front- or all-wheel drive, the Trax has
leisurely acceleration along with plenty PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE a 1.4-liter turbo four-cylinder and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
of engine drone. Handling is very $12,270-$18,045 47 six-speed automatic, which didn’t $21,000-$27,600 55
responsive, but the overly sensitive Reliability 3* Satisfaction 3* MPG 33 deliver impressive performance or Reliability 5 Satisfaction 2 MPG 25
steering makes it feel unsettling at particularly frugal fuel economy. The
speed. The ride is unyieldingly stiff. Inside, the elevated seating position gives cabin is narrow, cramped, and overall basic, with just a few niceties.
the driver a commanding view out. The rear seat, however, is best suited for Pronounced engine noise and a stiff ride don’t add to the experience, nor
a backpack. The MyLink infotainment system has a 7-inch color display, does the occasionally bumpy transmission. The Trax features the next-
making the Spark up-to-date on the connectivity front. Other updates include generation versions of OnStar and MyLink infotainment systems. At $26,000,
forward-collision warning and lane-departure warning. our Trax LT AWD test car cost as much as larger, more substantial SUVs such
as the Subaru Forester.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Chevrolet Volt Dodge Charger
0
GM’s second-generation Like its cousin, the
60
54 electric car with a backup 61 Chrysler 300, the Charger
gas engine is much is a big, comfortable
OVERALL improved. It is quicker OVERALL cruiser with an array of
SCORE SCORE
and quieter, rides more sophisticated technology
comfortably, and has easier-to-use on tap. It delivers a comfortable ride,
controls. Electric-only range is PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE and the quiet cabin is well-equipped, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
50 miles, at which point the engine $33,220-$37,570 70 making the Charger a bargain luxury $27,995-$63,995 82-85
kicks in to extend the range. It takes Reliability 1 Satisfaction 5 MPG 105 sedan. The 3.6-liter V6 and eight-speed Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 20-22
4.5 hours to recharge the car using a automatic work well, and the 370-hp,
240-volt connection. We got 38 mpg in gas mode. This new 1.5-liter engine 5.7-liter Hemi V8 packs more punch at the expense of fuel economy. The
acts as a generator, which eliminates the range anxiety common to power-mad can have a 485-hp 6.4-liter or the Hellcat’s 707-hp supercharged
electric-only vehicles. Visibility is still limited, and the rear seat is cramped and V8. All-wheel drive is optional on mainstream versions. Automatic emergency
awkward to get into. However, the infotainment system is among the best. braking and lane-keeping assist are available. The well-designed UConnect
The Volt’s tepid heat makes the heated seats and steering wheel must-have touch-screen infotainment system is optional. Reliability has remained well
features. First-year reliability of the redesign has been well below average. below average.
Chrysler 300 Dodge Durango
0 0
Chrysler’s roomy and Spacious, quiet, and
66 luxurious 300 is one of 58 comfortable, the Durango
the best large sedans on impressively blends
OVERALL the market. Inside, you’ll OVERALL workhorse utility with
SCORE SCORE
find plenty of space for ample creature comforts.
five adults, along with comfortable It shares its platform with the Jeep
seats and attractive trim. The 5.7-liter PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE Grand Cherokee but is longer and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
V8 is punchy but thirsty. We prefer the $31,395-$43,695 83-84 adds a third-row seat. Handling is $29,995-$45,090 83
3.6-liter V6, which got a good 22 mpg Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 20-22 responsive. The ride is composed and Reliability 2 Satisfaction 4 MPG 18
overall in our tests. Both engines use a comfortable, making the Durango feel
smooth eight-speed automatic. All-wheel drive is optional. A stately ride, sophisticated and substantial. The slick eight-speed automatic improved
responsive handling, and a quiet cabin make the 300 feel like a true luxury performance and fuel economy with both the V6 and V8 engines. The
car at thousands less than luxury brands charge. The UConnect infotainment optional UConnect 8.4-inch infotainment system is one of the best, with
system is one of the best in the industry. The last freshening added a rotating intuitive operation. Cargo room is generous, and the Durango can tow
gearshift knob, a big driver-info screen in the gauge cluster, and a host of 1,000 to 2,000 pounds more than competitors can tow. Limited visibility is a
modern safety gear. Reliability has improved to average. downside, but a rearview camera is standard on all but the lowest trim lines.
Reliability has dropped to below average.
Chrysler Pacifica Dodge Grand Caravan
0 0
The Pacifica is much The Dodge Grand
66 better than the Chrysler 62 Caravan continues on,
Town & Country minivan as its corporate sibling
OVERALL it replaced. The new OVERALL Chrysler Town & Country
SCORE SCORE
van is offered in seven- has been replaced,
and eight-passenger configurations complete with a new name: Pacifica.
and retains the handy fold-into-the- PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE The Dodge offers a lower price, but PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
floor second-row seats. But these seats $28,595-$44,995 85 there is no escaping the reality that this $23,995-$32,395 72
have limited thigh support. The 3.6-liter Reliability 2* Satisfaction 5 MPG 21 is an older design that falls short Reliability 3 Satisfaction 2 MPG 17
V6, paired with a nine-speed automatic as a family road-trip machine. For
transmission, provides ample power and gets an impressive 21 mpg overall. instance, the second-row seats are thin, low, and uncomfortable. Although
Handling is responsive, the ride is comfortable, and the cabin is quiet. the 283-hp V6 is powerful, its fuel economy is lousy at just 17 mpg overall—
A plug-in hybrid version is available with a claimed electric range of 30 miles. the worst among all minivans in our tests. And the van scored a Poor in the
The latest version of the UConnect touch-screen system is intuitive and easy IIHS small-overlap frontal crash test. Don’t be swayed by the massive
to master. High-end versions of the Pacifica feature individual screens, incentives that will probably be available on this minivan, already the
with built-in games, for the rear passengers. cheapest one on the market.
Dodge Challenger Dodge Journey
0 0
The look may be Don’t start believing in the
53 old-school, yet the 49 Dodge Journey. On paper,
Challenger is a modern, this midsized SUV may
OVERALL thrilling barnstormer. It’s OVERALL sound compelling, but in
SCORE SCORE
too heavy and wide for our tests, we found that it
pinpoint handling on narrow roads, but has a confining interior and lacks
it’s balanced and enjoyable on an open PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE agility, and the V6 delivers the worst PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
track. The V8 sound is heartwarming. $26,995-$58,295 70 fuel economy in its class. Added to $20,995-$33,695 64
Ride comfort, noise isolation, and the Reliability 1 Satisfaction 5 MPG 20 that, it suffers from below-average Reliability 2 Satisfaction 2 MPG 16
stiff shifter and clutch detract, and the reliability and poor performance in the
view out is dreadful. The rear seat is relatively roomy, but access is awkward. IIHS small-overlap frontal crash test. But it rides well, the cabin is relatively
Performance packages include a 485-hp, 6.4-liter V8 and a 707-hp, 6.2-liter quiet, and it offers a snug third-row seat. The Journey is late in its model run,
supercharged V8 in the Hellcat. A six-speed manual and an eight-speed with discounts commonplace. But don’t be tempted. This low-rated model is
automatic are available. We prefer the 5.7-liter V8 over the base V6. Safety a poor value anywhere—even at the airport rental lot.
tech includes blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, and forward-
collision warning. Reliability has been below average. New for 2017 is an
all-wheel-drive GT version with a V6 engine.

Profiles
Fiat 124 Ford C-Max !

0
0 0
The Fiat 124 Spider is Based on the compact
NA more than a rebadged 73 Focus, the five-passenger
Miata—it’s powered by a C-Max hybrid is a clever,
OVERALL 160-hp, 1.4-liter turbo OVERALL quiet, spacious, and
SCORE SCORE
four-cylinder from the practical hatchback. It
Fiat stable and gets its own exterior rides well and handles capably.
styling. Like the Miata, it can be paired PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE Regenerative braking helps with fuel PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
with a six-speed manual or six-speed $24,995-$28,195 NA economy but makes the brake pedal $24,170-$31,770 77
automatic transmission. Though that’s Reliability 3* Satisfaction 5* MPG NA feel touchy. The 2.0-liter four-cylinder Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 37-47
a smaller engine than the Mazda’s and electric motor deliver adequate
nonturbo 2.0-liter, the Fiat produces more readily available power. The Fiat acceleration and seamless transitions between gas and electric power, and
has more comfortable seats than the Miata has. Different suspension tuning the C-Max can run in electric mode up to about 40 mph. We measured an
lets the 124 corner with less body lean and a more relaxed turn-in response excellent 37 mpg overall. The Energi plug-in can travel in electric-only mode
than the Mazda’s. The sportier Abarth version features tighter handling for about 18 miles before switching to hybrid operation. It takes 6 hours to
and a fittingly zesty exhaust note. Like with the Miata, opening and closing charge on 120-volt and 2 hours on 240-volt. Ford’s new Sync 3 infotainment
the manual top is a breeze. The two-seater cabin is very tight. system is standard. Reliability has been average.
Fiat 500 Ford Edge !

0
0
The 500’s alert handling, Vastly improved, the
40
52 free-revving engine, and 73 second-generation Edge
crisp-shifting manual carries itself like a pricier
OVERALL make it engaging to drive. OVERALL European SUV. Based on
SCORE SCORE
The base engine and the commendable Fusion
manual returned 33 mpg overall, but it sedan, the Edge likewise delivers a
lacks low-end thrust. The 135-hp turbo PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE steady, comfortable ride and confident PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
improves the experience. On all $14,995-$31,800 52-66 handling that makes it fun to drive. The $28,950-$40,900 84
versions the ride is choppy and the Reliability 1 Satisfaction 2 MPG 28-34 standard 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 21
cabin noisy. Head room up front is gets 21 mpg and is more pleasant than
good, but some will find the steering wheel too far away and the driving the 3.5-liter V6. A twin-turbo, 2.7-liter V6 is offered on the Sport trim. All use a
position awkward. The tight rear seats are difficult to access, and the cargo smooth six-speed automatic. Front- and all-wheel-drive versions are available.
area is miniscule. The convertible top can be pulled back like a sunroof or The quiet cabin wouldn’t be out of place in a luxury car. The roomy interior
fully dropped. The Abarth is quick and grips well, and the electric 500e is provides comfortable quarters, front and rear, and cargo space is generous.
enjoyable for its silence and efficiency. Reliability has been well below Ford’s Sync 3 infotainment system is comprehensive and easy to use. Safety
average. The 500 scored a Poor in the IIHS small-overlap crash test. options include blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, and front
and rear cameras.
Fiat 500L Ford Escape !

0
0 0
This Italian confection For 2017 the Ford Escape
35 feels undercooked and 71 received a few updates,
has several significant including new 1.5- and
OVERALL flaws. It earned a dismal OVERALL 2.0-liter turbocharged
SCORE SCORE
road-test score, thanks in engines with start/stop
part to a stiff ride, flat seats, and an capability and advanced safety
odd driving position. No surprise, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE features such as forward-collision PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
owner satisfaction is low—meaning a $20,995-$23,695 50 warning. The fleet-footed Escape has $23,600-$30,800 75
strong percentage of owners wish they Reliability 1 Satisfaction 2 MPG 27 impressive handling prowess, which Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 23
hadn’t bought this hatchback. The makes it one of the sportiest models
500L also has one of the worst reliability records among all new cars in our in the small-SUV class. It also has a taut, controlled ride and a quiet interior,
recent survey. If that still isn’t enough to dissuade you, it scored a Poor in but the rear seat is a bit low and the cushion is short. The impressive
the IIHS small-overlap frontal test. To its credit, this quasi-wagon responds Sync 3 system is standard, replacing the old MyFord Touch infotainment
eagerly in corners and handles securely at its limit, and has a roomy cabin. system. One new feature is Sync Connect, a smartphone app that allows
But it would take more than those virtues for this to earn a place on a owners to use their cell phone to lock and unlock their Escape, remotely
smart shopper’s list. start the engine, and track the vehicle location via GPS. Reliability has
improved to average.
Fiat 500X Ford Expedition !

0
0 0
With its adorable styling This imposing SUV’s
42 you almost want to hug 67 3.5-liter turbocharged V6
the 500X. But the more delivers more power and
OVERALL time you spend with OVERALL better fuel economy than
SCORE SCORE
it, the more its appeal the V8 it replaced. Paired
wanes, thanks to its stiff ride, with the standard six-speed automatic,
noisy cabin, restricted visibility, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE our Expedition returned 14 mpg overall PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
annoying vibration when idling, and $19,995-$27,035 50 in testing, a 1-mpg improvement. The $41,700-$68,996 61
unsupportive seats. Styled like a burlier Reliability 1* Satisfaction 4* MPG 23 V6 also has plenty of torque for trailer Reliability 5 Satisfaction 5 MPG 14
Fiat 500, the X is a sister vehicle to the towing. Regular- and long-wheelbase
Jeep Renegade, and it shares some of the same virtues and weaknesses. versions are available, as well as eight-passenger seating that includes
Both models offer two four-cylinder engines: the 160-hp, 1.4-liter turbo and legitimate third-row seating for adults. And that’s where the good news
a 180-hp, 2.4-liter. Both are mated to a nine-speed automatic that is neither ends. The aging Expedition trails the competition because of its clumsy
smooth nor responsive. Fuel economy, at 23 mpg overall, is unimpressive handling, noisy cabin, and low-rent interior. Thankfully, however, Sync 3
for a vehicle this size. The interior has some flair and a number of available replaced the much-maligned MyFord Touch infotainment system.
features, such as automatic emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, Reliability is now much above average.
and heated seats.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Ford Explorer Ford Flex !

0
0 0
Though it is roomy and The boxy Flex combines
59 has a livable third-row 74 SUV-like versatility with
seat, the Explorer trails almost carlike driving
OVERALL the competition. Handling OVERALL dynamics. The interior is
SCORE SCORE
is ungainly, the ride is not highly functional, with
entirely settled, and the nonturbo V6 room for up to seven passengers in
powertrain is unrefined. Ford’s PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE three rows, and its shipping-container PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
three-row SUV offers a slew of optional $31,160-$53,235 67 shape works well for cargo. Rear $29,710-$42,710 73
safety systems, as well as a more Reliability 2 Satisfaction 3 MPG 18 visibility is hampered by big head Reliability 4 Satisfaction 5 MPG 18
fuel-efficient 2.3-liter turbo four- restraints. Handling is not particularly
cylinder engine. The top-shelf Platinum trim level is quite luxurious. The front nimble, but the ride is comfortable and the cabin remains quiet. The
and rear 180-degree cameras have a wash function to keep the lens clean. base 3.5-liter V6 gets just 18 mpg overall. Choosing the turbo V6 gives
Lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control are optional. The MyFord you quicker acceleration at a cost of only 1 mpg. The complicated and
Touch system now includes redundant knobs and buttons to compensate for distracting MyFord Touch infotainment system has been replaced by the
the unresponsive onscreen touch-sensitive buttons and controls. much better Sync 3 system.
Ford F-150 Ford Focus

Ford’s big-selling pickup Available as a sedan,
64 truck has an all-aluminum
45 a hatchback, and an
65 51
body, which saves about electric version, the
OVERALL 700 pounds over steel. OVERALL Focus feels solid and
SCORE SCORE
Engine choices include a sophisticated, but it’s
3.5-liter V6, 2.7- and 3.5-liter turbo V6s, plagued by poor reliability and, at low
and a 5.0-liter V8. For 2017 the 3.5-liter PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE speeds, a jerky transmission. The car is PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
turbo gets a 10-speed automatic and $26,540-$63,025 78-80 fun to drive, thanks to its agile handling $16,775-$36,120 62-74
the others use a six-speed automatic. Reliability 2 Satisfaction 5 MPG 16-17 and supple, controlled ride. The cabin Reliability 1 Satisfaction 2 MPG 26-107
We tested the 2.7- and 3.5-liter turbo is quiet, with good-quality materials for
engines, and each delivered abundant power. In our tests the 2.7 got the class. But the driving position is narrow compared with newer
17 mpg overall, 1 mpg better than the turbo 3.5. The 2.7 is also surprisingly competitors. A new 123-hp, 1.0-liter three-cylinder turbo, shared with the
quicker from 0 to 60 mph. The cabin is very quiet, but the ride is jittery and smaller Fiesta, is available, but it’s slow and returns the same 29 mpg overall
handling is rather ponderous. Safety offerings include forward-collision as the 2.0-liter. A rearview camera is now standard. Ford has replaced the
warning and blind-spot monitoring. Other notable features include a problematic MyFord Touch infotainment system with the superior Sync 3
360-degree-view camera and integrated loading ramps. Reliability has system. The sporty ST version is quick and fun, and sounds thrilling, and the
dropped to below average. new high-performance AWD RS comes with a 350-hp, turbo four-cylinder.
Ford F-250 Ford Fusion !

0
0
The Super Duty’s body is The Fusion is a delight to
75
NA now made of aluminum, 77 drive, with a supple ride
which contributes to a and nimble handling
OVERALL relatively light weight, OVERALL reminiscent of a European
SCORE SCORE
aiding acceleration and sports sedan. All trim
fuel economy. The crew cab’’s interior levels and powertrains feel solid and
is roomy, with a generous rear seat and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE upscale, with a well-finished and quiet PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
several handy features, such as a $32,535-$70,905 NA cabin. We found the optional leather $22,610-$41,120 78-81
collapsible cargo box under the rear Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG 15 seats to be more supportive than Reliability 4 Satisfaction 3 MPG 22-39
seat. The F-250 is a very tall vehicle the cloth ones, and the rear seat is
with a high step-in, making access awkward, but the tailgate is light. The somewhat snug. The 1.5- and 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinders are powerful
Sync 3 infotainment system is easy to use, and the instruments let you view enough, but neither has competitive fuel economy. A new high-end version,
pertinent information, such as engine hours. The powerful and relatively the Sport, is equipped with all-wheel drive and a 325-hp, 2.7-liter V6. It is
quiet 6.7-liter diesel is a natural choice. The ride is stiff but not overly quick, comfortable, and quiet, but it costs more than $40,000. The Hybrid
punishing. Handling is very clumsy but ultimately secure. A maximum and Energi plug-in hybrid receive more-efficient electric motors for 2017.
towing capacity of 17,600 pounds and the ability to attach a snow plow A new rotary shift dial and Ford’s new and improved Sync 3 infotainment
make it a dedicated work vehicle. system highlight the updates to the interior.
Ford Fiesta Ford Mustang

This subcompact has The Mustang is stylish
46 agile handling that makes
58 and enjoyable to drive,
52 62
it fun to drive, as well as a thanks to its agility and
OVERALL supple, controlled ride. OVERALL planted ride control. Base
SCORE SCORE
Interior fit and finish and models use a 300-hp,
equipment levels are among the best 3.7-liter V6. The optional 310-hp,
of the class, and the cabin is relatively PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE 2.3-liter turbo four-cylinder delivers PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
quiet. But the rear seat is very $14,580-$21,460 64-74 some punch but sounds raspy. The GT $24,915-$54,570 76-84
cramped. Our tested 120-hp, 1.6-liter Reliability 1 Satisfaction 2 MPG 29-35 features a muscular 5.0-liter V8, which Reliability 1 Satisfaction 5 MPG 19-25
Fiesta with the five-speed manual best suits the car. We found the slick
delivered excellent fuel economy but felt sluggish. A six-speed automated six-speed manual to be particularly satisfying, and the automatic works well.
manual tends to cause the car to stumble in stop-and-go traffic. Other The front seats are comfortable, but the rear is very cramped. Coupe and
choices are a 1.0-liter three-cylinder turbo and the sporty Fiesta ST that is convertible body styles are available, but the convertible uses an annoying
truly a treat to drive if your kidneys can handle the stiff ride. Sync 3 has manual latch to secure the top. Safety gear includes blind-spot warning and
replaced the MyFord Touch infotainment system. Reliability of the Fiesta has rear cross-traffic alert. Ford has replaced the old infotainment system with the
remained well below average. better Sync 3 system, and a high-performance GT 350 trim has joined the
lineup. Reliability of the redesign has been below average.

Profiles
Ford Taurus GMC Sierra 1500
0 0
Putting styling ahead of The Sierra and similar
66 interior comfort and 65 Chevrolet Silverado have
driver visibility, the Taurus relatively responsive
OVERALL wasn’t helped by the OVERALL handling and a spacious,
SCORE SCORE
convoluted MyFord Touch quiet cabin. Benefits
control system. Fuel economy from the include easy cabin access, intuitive
3.5-liter V6 is 21 mpg. The six-speed PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE controls, and generous towing and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
automatic can be slow to shift and is $26,600-$39,200 72 payload capacities. Fuel economy with $26,605-$53,760 80
not very smooth. A more fuel-efficient Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 21 the 5.3-liter V8 crew cab we tested was Reliability 2 Satisfaction 3 MPG 16
turbo four-cylinder is available. 16 mpg overall, but the truck feels a bit
Otherwise, the Taurus is quiet, rides comfortably, and has lots of features. sluggish in everyday driving. Other engines are a 4.3-liter V6 and powerful
Handling is responsive but not sporty, and the turning circle is wide. The 6.2-liter V8. Its few shortcomings include a jittery ride and front seats that
SHO, with standard AWD, is quick but not engaging to drive. A rearview aren’t as supportive as those in certain competitors. Lane-keeping assist is
camera is standard. Ford has replaced the MyFord Touch infotainment system offered, and Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are available. Reliability has
with the new Sync 3 system, which is superior. Reliability has been average, been below average.
but it scored too low to recommend.
Ford Transit Connect GMC Sierra 2500HD
0 0
This derivative of the The Sierra HD and its
68 Focus is no minivan NA twin, the Chevrolet
substitute, even though it Silverado HD, are
OVERALL can seat five or seven. OVERALL designed for heavy
SCORE SCORE
With its boxy shape and towing and hauling. The
very tall roof you’d be challenged to 6.0-liter V8 and 6.6-liter turbodiesel are
find more passenger space for the PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE both mated to a six-speed automatic. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
money. The steady, supple ride and $22,000-$29,185 76 The latter employs a heavy-duty $27,965-$45,865 NA
frisky handling are where the positives Reliability 3* Satisfaction 2 MPG 21 transmission made by Allison. A natural Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 14
end, though. It remains a commercial gas version of the 6.0-liter V8 is also
vehicle at heart, with a lackluster four-cylinder, a low-rent interior, available. The optional off-road suspension package makes the ride stiffer.
cumbersome folding seats, and a skimpy level of standard features. Unlike Other options include a snow-plow preparation kit and a frame-mounted
a minivan, it doesn’t have power doors or a rear-seat entertainment system, hitch for fifth-wheel towing. The cab offers a lot of storage space and can
and even Bluetooth connectivity costs extra. The base four-cylinder managed easily serve as a mobile office. The top-trim Denali has a luxurious interior.
only 21 mpg overall, and we see little indication that the uplevel 1.6-liter Android Auto and Apple CarPlay capabilities are now part of the easy-to-use
turbo-four would be more frugal. infotainment system.
GMC Acadia !
0 GMC Terrain
0 0
The new Acadia is shorter The next-generation
76 and 500 pounds lighter NA Terrain and its twin, the
than the old model. The Chevrolet Equinox, bring
OVERALL ride is steady and OVERALL tidier dimensions, in line
SCORE SCORE
composed, and handling with the small SUV
is responsive. The most appropriate segment. The new Terrain packs the
engine is the smooth 3.6-liter V6 that PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE latest infotainment and safety PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
returned 19 mpg in our tests, which $29,070-$46,920 83 technology, and two four-cylinder $24,000-$37,000E NA
isn’t a standout. A less powerful but Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG 19 turbocharged engines. The base Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
still sound 2.5-liter four-cylinder is engine is a 170-hp 1.5-liter, and the
standard. This family-friendly three-row SUV is very quiet, the front seats are uplevel choice is a 252-hp 2.0-liter. Both are mated to a nine-speed
comfortable, and the infotainment system is easy to use. The outboard automatic. A diesel engine, paired to a six-speed automatic, will also be
second-row seats can slide and tilt forward, even with a child seat in place. available. GMC’s IntelliLink infotainment system will be offered in 7- and
But many luxury features, such as four-way adjustable lumbar, a power 8-inch forms, each with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay compatibility. For
sunroof shade, and auto-up windows, are missing even on our high-end active safety, forward-collision warning and low-speed automatic emergency
Denali version. Available safety features include forward-collision warning braking, lane-keep assist with lane-departure warning, and blind-spot
with automatic braking, pedestrian detection, and blind-spot monitoring. warning will be offered. The 2018 Terrain goes on sale this summer.
GMC Canyon GMC Yukon
0
GM’s small pickups, the This more luxurious
56
57 Canyon and its Chevrolet 51 version of the Chevrolet
Colorado twin, are more Tahoe uses a 5.3-liter V8
OVERALL maneuverable than OVERALL and six-speed automatic
SCORE SCORE
full-sized trucks and that returns 16 mpg and
better equipped than their Nissan and doesn’t feel particularly energetic. Ride
Toyota competitors. In our tests the V6 PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE and handling are not stellar, although PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
version got 18 mpg overall, and the $20,940-$46,850 67-69 the Magnetic Ride Control suspension $47,330-$66,675 67
four-cylinder diesel bumped fuel Reliability 2 Satisfaction 3 MPG 18-24 on the Denali version improves ride Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 16
economy to 24 mpg. V6 versions comfort and handling response. The
feature a tow-haul mode. A four-cylinder gasoline engine is also available. The 6.2-liter engine that comes on the Denali is also a meaningful upgrade, but it
ride is rather choppy, but handling is responsive. Rear- and four-wheel-drive raises the price considerably. Proper optional equipment gives the Yukon
versions are available. Inside are the latest electronics, including the MyLink a towing capacity of 8,500 pounds, about the only advantage it has over a
Bluetooth audio system. These are the first small trucks to offer forward- car-based SUV. Just as in the Tahoe, the third-row seat is low and tiny.
collision and lane-departure warnings; a backup camera is standard. New for Automatic emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, and lane-keep assist
2017 are an eight-speed automatic and more horsepower to the V6. Reliability are optional. Reliability has been well below average.
has been below average.

1 2 3 4 5 !
GMC Yukon XL Honda CR-V
0 0
This truck-based SUV is a The redesigned CR-V
50 twin of the Chevrolet NA gains features, space, and
Suburban. The third-row optional turbo power. The
OVERALL seat in the XL is a bit OVERALL base model is fitted with a
SCORE SCORE
roomier than the one in carryover 184-hp, 2.4-liter
the shorter GMC Yukon, and there is four-cylinder engine. Upper trims sport
plenty of cargo room when that row is PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE a 190-hp, 1.5-liter turbo. A continuously PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
raised. Power comes from a 5.3-liter V8 $43,905-$61,110 67 variable transmission is standard and $24,045-$33,695 NA
and a six-speed automatic that returns Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 16 works well with both engines. Handling Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
16 mpg and feels slightly sluggish. It’s is more nimble and sure-footed, and
too bad that you have to opt for the expensive Denali version to get the the ride is steady and compliant. Road noise has been suppressed, resulting
Magnetic Ride Control suspension, which improves ride comfort and is a quieter cabin. The interior is very comfortable and roomy, particularly the
handling response. The 6.2-liter engine on the Denali is also a meaningful rear seat, and more upscale. Controls have been improved. An available
upgrade, but it significantly increases the price. Properly equipped, the XL 7-inch touch-screen infotainment system offers Android Auto and Apple
can tow 8,500 pounds, its only advantage over a car-based SUV. Lane- CarPlay compatibility and Garmin navigation. Available safety gear includes
keeping assist and Apple CarPlay capability are available. Reliability has been automatic emergency braking and blind-spot warning.
well below average.
Genesis G80 !
0 Honda Civic
0
Part of the launch of The Civic is substantial,
57
80 Hyundai’s upscale brand 58 refined, and capable.
is the renaming of The 2.0-liter four-cylinder
OVERALL existing models. OVERALL and optional 1.5-liter
SCORE SCORE
Previously known as the turbo deliver good fuel
Hyundai Genesis, it is now called the economy, and the turbo brings more
G80. For about $10,000 less than PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE oomph and readily available power. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
competing midsized luxury sedans, the $41,400-$54,550 89 The continuously variable transmission $18,740-$28,300 75-76
G80 delivers just about every feature Reliability 3* Satisfaction 5* MPG 20 amplifies the noise of the base engine; Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 31-32
and luxury attribute a buyer could it works better with the turbo. The ride
imagine. Offered with a smooth and refined V6 or a potent V8, the G80 has is comfortable, handling is precise, and the interior has a lot of storage space.
responsive handling and a comfortable ride, though it can’t quite match its However, the car’s low stance means doing the limbo to get in and out. In
German competitors. Our tested AWD V6 returned a competitive 20 mpg addition, the front seats lack adjustable lumbar support, which could cause
overall. Controls are refreshingly straightforward for a luxury car. Rear-seat discomfort. We found Honda’s infotainment system to be unintuitive—the
passengers are pampered with amenities, including seat heaters, and space only way to avoid it is to get the base LX. Forward-collision warning is
is plentiful. Most versions come with automatic emergency braking and available. A four-door hatchback version is new. First-year reliability of the
blind-spot monitoring. redesign has been well below average.
Genesis G90 Honda Clarity
0 0
Hyundai’s flagship sedan The new Clarity FCV has a
NA is the G90, which features NA more compact hydrogen
a 5.0-liter V8 or a 3.3-liter fuel cell and powertrain
OVERALL turbocharged V6, which OVERALL than in past versions, yet
SCORE SCORE
is the better choice. Both with a claimed driving
are mated to a smooth eight-speed range beyond 300 miles. It takes 3 to
automatic and are available with either PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE 5 minutes to fully fuel it with hydrogen. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
rear- or all-wheel drive, addressing a $68,100-$72,200 NA The Clarity FCV can be leased for $369 $60,000-$65,000E NA
shortcoming of the rear-drive-only Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA per month, at a retail price of about Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
Equus. The spacious cabin is bathed in $60,000. Honda has also added Clarity
soft-touch materials and decked out with wood and chrome trim, but it Electric and Clarity Plug-In Hybrid versions to be launched in 2017. If the
comes up short on wow factor. The ride is cushy and cosseting; the cabin is electric Clarity can go 200 miles between charges, it will compete with
super-quiet. Handling is responsive, although not sporty. As is typical for this the Chevy Bolt and Tesla Model 3. The Plug-In Hybrid will be offered in all
oft-chauffeur-driven class, the backseat is really the place to be. It has 50 states and feature a 40-mile all-electric range before the gas engine kicks
massaging seats, and controls in the rear armrest manage audio and climate in. All versions will come standard with automatic emergency braking
settings. A complete suite of advanced safety features is standard. and blind-spot warning.
Honda Accord !
0 Honda Fit !
0
0
The Accord is one of the The Honda Fit
81
82 better midsized sedans. 66 subcompact hatchback
It is well-equipped and has always been an
OVERALL competitively priced, OVERALL appealing urban
SCORE SCORE
and it performs well. It runabout. Thanks to its
handles responsively, though the ride clever multiconfigurable seating, the
can be a bit choppy. It has a roomy PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE Fit delivers versatility similar to a that PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
and well-finished interior. The four- $22,455-$35,955 84-85 of small SUV. The Fit gets great fuel $16,090-$21,365 67
cylinder gets 30 mpg overall with its Reliability 4 Satisfaction 4 MPG 26-30 economy at 33 mpg overall. But that Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 33
unobtrusive CVT. The 3.5-liter V6 is comes with excessive noise when the
lively and refined, and gets a decent 26 mpg overall. But the infotainment continuously variable transmission keeps the engine at high revs. Handling
system on EX and above versions is unintuitive. Standard automatic climate is responsive, but the Fit has a stiff ride. On top of that, the cabin is loud,
control is a nice feature, but the LX lacks a power seat. The 2014 Hybrid that making the Fit unfit for long drives. Opting for the EX brings a sunroof
we tested got 40 mpg overall and operates smoothly, but it sacrifices a lot and paddle shifters; the EX-L includes heated leather seats. The button-
of trunk space. Reliability has been above average. free touch-screen radio on EX and higher trims is a constant frustration,
and the seats and driving position aren’t very comfortable. Reliability
has been average.

Profiles
Honda HR-V !
0 Hyundai Accent
0 0
Based on the Fit The entry-level Accent
69 subcompact, the HR-V 61 subcompact is available
gets a versatile, as a basic yet sensible
OVERALL cargo-friendly rear seat OVERALL sedan or hatchback.
SCORE SCORE
that flips up or folds down With the smooth and
flat and low. Considerably smaller and responsive automatic, the sedan
less expensive than the CR-V, the HR-V PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE attained 31 mpg overall, and we PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
is loud and the ride is stiff. Handling is $19,465-$26,240 66 got 32 mpg for the stick-shift Sport $14,745-$17,495 65
responsive and secure. Power comes Reliability 4 Satisfaction 3 MPG 29 hatchback in our tests. That isn’t such Reliability 4 Satisfaction 2 MPG 31
from a 141-hp four-cylinder driving great fuel economy, considering the
either the front or all four wheels. But the HR-V feels underpowered, an new larger, more substantial Elantra gets 33 mpg overall. Though the front
impression amplified by the continuously variable transmission. The Honda’s cabin is roomy enough, the cramped rear seat is on par for this class.
trump card is its excellent 29 mpg overall, very flexible interior, and generous Handling is fairly responsive, but the ride is rather jittery. Noise levels are
rear seat and cargo room. The front seat is short on support, however. elevated but not offensive. The controls are straightforward. Reliability has
Available premium features include heated leather seats, a sunroof, and been above average, but we cannot recommend the Accent because it
keyless entry, and a rearview camera is standard. We prefer the LX trim over scored a Poor in the IIHS small-overlap crash test.
the EX for its simpler audio controls.
Honda Odyssey !
0 Hyundai Elantra !
0
0 0
This versatile and capable The redesigned 2017
79 hauler combines clever 69 Elantra is relatively roomy,
and generous packaging is sparing with fuel, and
OVERALL with responsive handling OVERALL features intuitive controls.
SCORE SCORE
and a supple ride— The 2.0-liter four-cylinder
surprising for a minivan. Its vigorous returned an excellent 33 mpg overall
3.5-liter V6 and smooth six-speed PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE in our tests but delivers leisurely PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
automatic returned 21 mpg overall $29,850-$45,325 84 acceleration and buzzes unpleasantly $17,150-$22,350 66
in our tests. The Odyssey can seat Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 21 as revs increase. The Eco version Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4 MPG 33
eight in relative comfort, with varying feels more responsive but comes at a
configurations for cargo and passenger needs. Easy access, excellent $3,000 price premium. Although handling is secure, there isn’t much driving
child-seat accommodations, and abundant cabin storage add to the excitement. The ride is mostly unobjectionable, but sharp bumps tend to
family-friendly quotient. Among our few gripes is the tediously complicated come through noticeably. Road noise is elevated as well. Inside, the front
dual touch-screen infotainment system. In addition, fit and finish and some seats in our tested SE are short on lumbar support, though the power seat in
material selection are not what one would expect at this price, and AWD isn’t the Limited is better. Active safety features are available. A Sport version with
available. A redesigned 2018 Odyssey goes on sale in the spring. a 1.6-liter turbo four-cylinder is also available.
Honda Pilot !
0 Hyundai Ioniq
0 0
The Pilot is quick, Angling to take on
75 comfortable, and refined, NA Toyota’s widely sold Prius,
but it’s not exactly a joy Hyundai is rolling out a
OVERALL to drive. Its three-row OVERALL compact hatchback
SCORE SCORE
seating configuration, hybrid that will be
roomy cabin, and abundant interior available in three flavors. First to arrive
storage make it an extremely PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE is the regular hybrid. A plug-in hybrid PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
functional vehicle. Power comes $30,595-$47,070 80 version, with the ability to go short $25,000-$35,000E NA
from a slick 3.5-liter V6 that is rated at Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 20 distances on just electric power, then Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
280 hp. We got 20 mpg overall in our act as a hybrid after the charge is used
tests of an EX-L with the standard six-speed automatic. We found the ride to up, will follow. The hybrid drivetrain consists of a 1.6-liter, four-cylinder
be comfortable but handling ungainly. The infotainment system is unintuitive. gasoline engine and electric drive, with a total output of 139 hp. Unlike most
Touring and Elite trims get a nine-speed that doesn’t shift very smoothly and hybrids, which use a continuously variable transmission, the Ioniq will employ
is stuck with an unintuitive push-button gear selector. Front- and all-wheel a six-speed automated manual transmission, which operates unobtrusively
drive are offered, and the optional Honda Sensing safety system includes and makes the car feel familiar and conventional. The third version will be a
automatic emergency braking. fully electric vehicle, with a 28-kWh battery and a claimed range of 110 miles.
Honda Ridgeline !
0 Hyundai Santa Fe !
0
0 0
Honda’s smart pickup The freshened 2017 Santa
76 is built on the same 78 Fe is available with
platform as the Honda advanced safety features
OVERALL Pilot and looks more OVERALL such as a multiview
SCORE SCORE
conventional than camera, automatic
the previous generation. It retains emergency braking with pedestrian
the unit-body construction, fully PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE detection, and lane-departure warning. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
independent suspension, and lockable $29,475-$42,970 80 This is still a roomy and comfortable $30,800-$41,150 81
trunk space below the bed floor. Power Reliability 3* Satisfaction 5 MPG 20 three-row SUV built for family duty. Its Reliability 4 Satisfaction 4 MPG 20
comes from a slick 3.5-liter V6 engine 3.3-liter V6 is mated to a smooth,
mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. We got 20 mpg overall in our responsive six-speed automatic, a combination that attained 20 mpg overall
tests, the best of any nondiesel pickup. Towing capacity is modest at in our tests. Handling is sound and utterly secure. Another plus is the settled,
5,000 pounds, and the bed is shallow. Front- and all-wheel-drive versions are compliant ride that blunts pavement imperfections and lets the SUV sail
available. Ride and handling are more refined than in conventional pickup smoothly on the highway. The well-finished cabin brings a lot of features for
trucks, and the cabin is quiet. The available Honda Sensing safety system the money. Access to the cramped third row is somewhat difficult. Hyundai’s
includes automatic emergency braking. updated Blue Link system features remote starting via mobile phones.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Hyundai Santa Fe Sport !

0 Infiniti Q50
0 0
Hyundai’s five-passenger After a recent freshening,
75 midsized SUV received a 71 the Q50 is now a
number of updates with competitive luxury
OVERALL its 2017 freshening, OVERALL sports sedan, available in
SCORE SCORE
including a standard rear- and all-wheel-drive
rearview camera, automatic configurations. Opting for the 3.0t
emergency braking with pedestrian PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE version brings a turbocharged V6 at PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
detection, and lane-departure warning. $25,350-$38,250 73 the price that most competitors charge $33,950-$49,950 85
It also improved from Marginal to Good Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 23 for a turbocharged four-cylinder. This Reliability 2 Satisfaction 2 MPG 22
in the IIHS small-overlap crash test. powertrain makes the Q50 quick and
This roomy SUV has a comfortable ride and a quiet interior. Power comes from punchy, but fuel economy falls short at 22 mpg overall. Handling is quite
a responsive 2.4-liter four-cylinder mated to a smooth six-speed automatic. nimble, and the ride is compliant. The cabin is relatively roomy, and the
We got a decent 23 mpg overall with this drivetrain. A more powerful 2.0-liter rear seat is hospitable, but the trunk is small, even for this class. Infiniti’s
turbo four-cylinder is also available. Handling is sound and secure but not touch-screen infotainment system is cumbersome to use, requiring multiple
exceptional. The well-finished cabin is packed with a lot of standard features, screen taps for simple tasks. Reliability has been below average, and
but rear visibility is so-so. Reliability has been above average. owner satisfaction is low in our survey. A turbo four-cylinder, a hybrid,
and a 400-hp turbo V6 are also available.
Hyundai Sonata !
0 Infiniti Q60
0
This competitive but A coupe version of the
73
75 ho-hum sedan has a quiet NA updated 2016 Q50, the
cabin, a comfortable ride, new Q60 gets the same
OVERALL and excellent rear-seat OVERALL slick and punchy 300-hp,
SCORE SCORE
room and access. 3.0-liter V6 twin turbo. In
Handling is sound and responsive fact, that engine is so good that the
enough. But the SE we tested had PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE 400-hp version is almost an PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
lackluster tire grip, hurting braking $21,600-$34,350 78-80 extravagance. A weaker 208-hp, $38,950-$53,300 NA
and emergency handling. The 2.4-liter Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 28-39 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbo engine is Reliability 2* Satisfaction 3* MPG NA
four-cylinder returned a good 28 mpg also available. All-wheel drive is
overall; a stronger 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder is optional. The Eco uses a optional. Engine and transmission responses can be customized with a new
1.6-liter turbo four-cylinder paired with a seven-speed automated manual. We Drive Mode Selector to fit personal preferences, from high performance to
found the controls to be easy to use, and the rear seat is one of the roomiest cruising comfort. The Q50 is now a competitive sports sedan, and the coupe
in the class. Safety features include forward-collision warning with automatic adds more style at the expense of four-door practicality. The infotainment-
emergency braking and blind-spot detection. Plug-in and hybrid versions are system touch screen and a few other controls are annoyingly complicated.
available; the latter returned an impressive 39 mpg overall in our tests and
makes for a very pleasant sedan.
Hyundai Tucson !
0 Infiniti Q70 !
0
The Tucson is one of Although long in the
73 the better small SUVs,
83 tooth, the Q70 is still
75 88
although neither of its competitive, with a lively
OVERALL powertrains is ideal. The OVERALL 330-hp V6 and a smooth
SCORE SCORE
base SE version gets a seven-speed automatic
164-hp, 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, that returned 21 mpg overall in our
routing through a six-speed automatic. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE tests. A V8 and a V6 hybrid are also PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
This version is rather slow and can feel $22,700-$31,175 76-79 available. Handling is quite agile, with $49,850-$67,050 83-90
strained. More expensive trims get a Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 24-26 communicative steering. The ride is Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 21-25
1.6-liter turbo four-cylinder that uses a firm and absorbs bumps well but trails
seven-speed automated manual transmission. This more powerful setup the competition in terms of plushness. The Q70 is also behind the
returned 26 mpg overall, but it suffers from a vibration at very low speeds, competition in terms of cabin quietness, partly because of the noticeable
such as in parking maneuvers. Ride comfort, handling agility, and noise engine noise under high revs. Very good interior quality, a roomy rear seat,
suppression are commendable. The rear seat is roomy, and controls are easy and easy-to-use controls are positives, although cabin ambience is austere.
to use. Advanced safety features, including automatic emergency braking Blind-spot intervention is optional. An extended-length L version with a
and blind-spot monitoring, are optional. roomier rear seat is also available. The Q70 might lack some pizazz, but it
generally commands significantly lower prices than its competitors.
Hyundai Veloster !
0 Infiniti QX30
0 0
The sporty Veloster Infiniti’s shortcut into the
63 hatchback has three 65 small-luxury-SUV
doors, with the right-side segment is the QX30,
OVERALL rear door providing OVERALL which is based on the
SCORE SCORE
access to the tight rear Mercedes-Benz GLA. The
seat. Based on the small Accent, the Infiniti uses the GLA’s 2.0-liter
Veloster’s 138-hp, 1.6-liter four-cylinder PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE turbocharged four-cylinder and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
delivers adequate power, and the $18,000-$23,950 67 seven-speed dual-clutch automatic. $29,950-$38,500 71
precise six-speed manual has Reliability 3* Satisfaction 3 MPG 31 The SUV is quick, but power delivery is Reliability 3* Satisfaction 3* MPG 25
low-effort throws. A dual-clutch, uneven. It feels lethargic at low engine
six-speed automated manual is optional. We got 31 mpg overall from a speeds, then the power comes on abruptly. Handling is agile and very secure,
version with the manual transmission. Moving up to the Turbo trim gets you but the ride is stiff and choppy. Road noise is pronounced. The cabin is nicely
a strong 201-hp turbocharged four-cylinder and an available seven-speed finished and incorporates some Mercedes switches, buttons, and knobs but
automated manual transmission. Handling is responsive and secure. Though uses Infiniti’s infotainment screen. The rear seat is cramped, and visibility is
the ride is quite stiff, it isn’t punishing. Rear visibility through the split back wanting. Available safety features include automatic emergency braking and
window is decent at best. blind-spot warning. Front-drive versions are priced in the low $30,000s,
and typical all-wheel-drive versions surpass $40,000.

Profiles
Infiniti QX50 Jaguar F-Pace
0 0
Infiniti’s QX50 dates back Jaguar’s first SUV is based
NA to 2008, when it was 56 on a rear-wheel-drive
known as the EX. The platform shared with the
OVERALL current model has a OVERALL XF and new XE. The
SCORE SCORE
3-inch-longer wheelbase, F-Pace is quick, thanks to
which grants more than 4 additional its 340-hp, supercharged 3.0-liter V6,
inches to rear-seat leg room. But PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE but the omnipresent engine drone PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
underneath it’s still essentially a $35,850 NA quickly becomes tiring. The S uses a $40,990-$69,700 72
raised-wagon version of the old G37 Reliability 5 Satisfaction 2 MPG NA 380-hp version of this engine, and a Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG 20
sedan, a car we liked very much at the 2.0-liter turbodiesel is the base engine.
time for its quickness, agility, and composed ride. Carrying over are the All versions come with an eight-speed automatic and all-wheel drive.
smooth seven-speed automatic and 325-hp, 3.7-liter V6, which remains The F-Pace is taut and nimble, contributing to the lively driving experience.
punchy but tends to be noisy by current standards. Up-to-date safety features However, the ride is stiff and choppy. The seats are comfortable, but interior
include forward-collision warning, blind-spot monitoring, and lane-keeping quality isn’t as impeccable as in the German competitors. The infotainment
assist. A redesigned QX50 is in the offing. system is behind the times, utilizing a slow and fussy touch screen.
Active safety features are available if you opt for the vision package.
Infiniti QX60 Jaguar F-Type
0 0
The midsized QX60 is Jaguar’s two-seat F-Type
65 spacious, quiet, and NA coupe and convertible
well-finished, with room are quick, sporty, and
OVERALL for seven but without the OVERALL capable, with a distinct
SCORE SCORE
bulk of a full-sized SUV. exhaust bark emanating
Based on the Nissan Pathfinder, it has a from the V8. But don’t expect
comfortable ride, but handling lacks PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE tranquility in the mold of the old XK, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
agility, making the QX feel rather $43,100-$53,450 79 which was a more luxury-oriented car. $61,400-$128,800 NA
mushy. Our tested 265-hp, 3.5-liter V6 Reliability 2 Satisfaction 2 MPG 19 Rear-drive V6 models are available with Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4 MPG NA
and continuously variable transmission a stiff-shifting six-speed manual
delivered adequate acceleration and returned a so-so 19 mpg overall on transmission. A smooth eight-speed automatic is standard, and the only
premium fuel. A family-friendly feature allows access to the third row even gearbox available with the V8. All-wheel drive is optional, and electric power
with a child seat installed in the second row. But the second-row seat cushion steering has replaced the hydraulic setup. The F-Type also gets Jaguar’s
is very low, compromising thigh support and seating posture. The 2017 model JustDrive smartphone app, which builds on the new InControl touch-screen
has been freshened, with 30 more hp added to its V6 and towing capacity infotainment system. The touch screen is rather slow to respond, and the
raised to 5,000 pounds. Reliability has been below average. Of note is also automatic transmission’s gear selector is unintuitive.
the QX60’s low owner-satisfaction score.
Infiniti QX70 Jaguar XE
0 0
Aging but still worthy, the The new XE is an athletic
60 QX70 stands out with an NA compact luxury sports
eager powertrain, bold sedan. Base models get a
OVERALL styling, and responsive OVERALL 180-hp, four-cylinder
SCORE SCORE
handling. We tested it diesel. A more potent
when it was still called the FX and had 340-hp, 3.0-liter supercharged V6
the 3.5-liter V6, which got 18 mpg PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE mated to an eight-speed automatic is PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
overall. Since then, the engine was $45,850-$56,950 72 the uplevel offering, with a new $34,900-$51,700 NA
upgraded to a 3.7-liter V6. Body roll is Reliability 2* Satisfaction 2* MPG 18 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder arriving Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
well-suppressed, although the QX70 this spring. Rear- and all-wheel-drive
isn’t exactly nimble, and it rides rather stiffly. The roomy cabin is well-finished versions are available. Our brief experience indicates that the XE is agile and
and mostly quiet, except for the loud engine. But the curvy styling hurts fun to drive, with a comfortable ride. But the interior ambience is not as
visibility and robs cargo space. A wide array of optional safety features opulent as one might expect from a Jaguar. The rear seat is extremely tight
includes automatic emergency braking. The useful surround-view camera and the infotainment system is not up to snuff. A host of advanced active
system gives a bird’s-eye view while parking. safety and driver assistance features are available.
Infiniti QX80 Jaguar XF
0 0
A very large SUV, the The redesigned XF is one
57 QX80 has a plush, 61 of the sportiest offerings
luxurious, and quiet among midsized luxury
OVERALL interior. We liked the OVERALL sedans. It’s taut and agile
SCORE SCORE
supple ride but found this yet possesses a supple
big barge to be ungainly, with and composed ride. The 340-hp
cumbersome handling in everyday PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE supercharged V6 is punchy, and a PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
driving, although it was ultimately $63,850-$89,450 68 more powerful 380-hp version is also $48,250-$66,200 83
secure in emergency maneuvers. The Reliability 2* Satisfaction 2 MPG 15 available. The front and rear seats are Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG 21
seven-speed automatic and 400-hp, comfortable, and the trunk is large.
5.6-liter V8 provide smooth and strong performance, but it chugs premium However, interior ambience is a bit austere for a Jaguar, and the standard
fuel and returned just 15 mpg overall. The tall step-up to the cabin makes infotainment system is slow and somewhat fussy. The uplevel InControl
climbing in or out an ungracious affair. Cargo volume is plentiful, and the Touch Pro system isn’t much better. The navigation system uses memory
small, power-folding third-row seat comes in handy to carry two kids. of past drives and real-time traffic info to offer alternate routes. All models get
Electronic safety aids include blind-spot warning and rear automatic braking. a generous five-year/60,000-mile warranty, which includes free scheduled
The new Nissan Armada is essentially the same vehicle but costs less. maintenance and roadside assistance.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Jaguar XJ Jeep Renegade
0 0
The capable, luxurious XJ Built in Italy, the
61 has graceful, nimble 42 subcompact Renegade
handling and a supple, looks enticingly cute but
OVERALL steady ride. Its 470-hp V8 OVERALL is bogged down by a
SCORE SCORE
makes the big sedan very nine-speed automatic
quick, but most versions have the that’s neither smooth nor responsive.
supercharged V6 with all-wheel drive. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE Fuel economy with the 2.4-liter was PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
The plush, quiet interior is crafted with $74,400-$121,000 82 24 mpg overall. Handling is $17,995-$28,140 56
genuine wood trim, copious amounts Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG 19 uninspiring, and the ride is Reliability 1 Satisfaction 3 MPG 24
of leather, and abundant chrome unremarkable. Idle vibration and an
details. But certain controls are confusing. The complex touch screen for the overly touchy brake pedal also mar the driving experience. Depending on
climate, audio, and navigation systems responds slowly and takes some options, the Renegade offers traditional Jeep features such as some off-road
getting used to. Our tested long-wheelbase XJL has a sumptuous backseat, ability in the Trailhawk version and open-air driving via its optional removable
but the low roofline impedes head room and access, and the trunk is small. A sunroofs. Optional safety features include forward-collision and lane-
new infotainment system and a more generous five-year/60,000-mile departure warning, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-path detection, and a
warranty are recent upgrades. backup camera. Chrysler’s Uconnect infotainment system is available.
Jeep Cherokee Jeep Wrangler
0
The Cherokee is too As an everyday vehicle,
47
55 unrefined to be a 28 the Wrangler trails most
contender among small SUVs, but few are better
OVERALL SUVs. The best version is OVERALL for off-road use. The
SCORE SCORE
the 3.2-liter V6 in Limited Wrangler uses Chrysler’s
trim. The 2.4-liter four-cylinder is slow, 3.6-liter V6 and five-speed automatic,
and its 22 mpg overall is lousy for the PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE which returned 17 mpg overall in our PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
class. The nine-speed automatic is not $23,595-$38,595 58-71 tests. Though the Wrangler may be $23,995-$42,245 20
very responsive or refined. Handling is Reliability 2 Satisfaction 2 MPG 21-22 better than ever before, the ride rocks Reliability 2 Satisfaction 4 MPG 17
competent but short on agility, and the and jiggles constantly, and handling is
ride is jittery. The rear seat is roomy, and controls are intuitive with the clumsy. Wind noise is very loud at highway speeds. Getting in and out is
8.4-inch Uconnect system. Limited trims can be fitted with high-end awkward, and the interior is uncomfortable. Off-road performance is
amenities. The Trailhawk is capable off-road, and the V6’s 4,500-pound legendary, and the Rubicon version performs better there than our tested
towing capacity is impressive. Recent updates included stop-start on the V6, Unlimited Sahara did. IIHS side-crash results for the two-door are Poor, and
Siri Eyes Free, and the ability to customize the touch screen. Reliability has the four-door scored Marginal; but offset-frontal and small-overlap results
been below average. for the four-door are Good. Reliability has been below average. A redesigned
Wrangler is on the way.
Jeep Compass Kia Cadenza
0 0
The new Compass, which Although the styling
NA slots above the Renegade NA changes are subtle, the
and below the Cherokee, redesigned 2017 Cadenza
OVERALL should be better than its OVERALL features an all-new body
SCORE SCORE
uncompetitive and structure. The new car is
outclassed predecessor. Power comes based on the Kia Optima, but it is
from a 180-hp, 2.4-liter four-cylinder— PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE considerably larger, competing with PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
an engine we found to be somewhat $20,000-$30,000E NA the Toyota Avalon and Chevrolet $31,990-$44,390 NA
unrefined and sluggish in other Jeeps. Reliability 2* Satisfaction 3* MPG NA Impala. The car is roomy and quiet, Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
Three transmission choices are with easy-to-use controls. Ride and
available: six-speed manual, and six- and nine-speed automatics. It has a handling are nothing special but pleasant enough. The 290-hp, 3.3-liter V6
roomy rear seat and the excellent Uconnect infotainment system. Available is slick and powerful, and the eight-speed automatic shifts smoothly.
safety features include forward-collision warning, lane-departure warning, Higher-end Limited versions include more soft-touch surfaces, real stitching
blind-spot monitoring, and a rearview camera. The Trailhawk will be the more on the dashboard, and available Nappa leather seats. Automatic emergency
robust off-road version, with rock-crawling gearing and off-road tires, and the braking, adaptive cruise control, and lane-departure warning are available.
ability to tow up to 2,000 pounds. The old Compass will be sold alongside
the new one, so make sure you don’t get swayed by its likely cheaper price.
Jeep Grand Cherokee Kia Forte !

0
0
The Grand Cherokee has Kia’s Forte provides
58
61 a solid, upscale interior; 73 generous interior room
comfortable seats; and a and a wide assortment of
OVERALL mostly compliant and OVERALL amenities. Our tested
SCORE SCORE
controlled ride. Handling base LX sedan got
is competent, fit and finish is excellent, 33 mpg overall with the new-for-2017
and the eight-speed automatic shifts PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE 2.0-liter four-cylinder and six-speed PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
smoothly. The standard 3.6-liter V6 $30,295-$68,390 80-84 automatic, which is similar to the $16,490-$23,690 80
returned just 18 mpg, though. We also Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 18-24 engine in the Hyundai Elantra. Though Reliability 4 Satisfaction 2 MPG 33
tested the diesel, which racked up the ride is fairly absorbent, it tends to
24 mpg overall. Two V8s, a 5.7-liter and the SRT’s 6.4-liter, are optional. The feel a bit too tender when encountering sharp bumps. Handling is very
Uconnect infotainment system, with its large, well-labeled touch screen, is secure but not particularly agile. The SX hatchback uses a 1.6-liter turbo
one of the best we’ve tested. Appropriately optioned, the Jeep makes a good mated to a seven-speed dual-clutch automated manual gearbox. The
tow vehicle or a capable off-roader. Recent updates included engine spacious interior is quiet for a compact car, and the controls are logically
stop-start for the revised V6, Siri Eyes Free, and an easier-to-use shift lever. arranged. Available features include front and rear heated and ventilated
Reliability has been well below average. seats, a rearview camera, and advanced safety features. High-end versions
offer leather seats, power-folding mirrors, and other upscale items.

Profiles
Kia K900 Kia Sedona
0 0
Kia’s flagship is the The Sedona is available in
NA brand’s first rear-drive 67 seven- or eight-passenger
model and cousin of the seating capacities. Under
OVERALL old Hyundai Equus. It is OVERALL the hood is a smooth and
SCORE SCORE
offered with a smooth and refined 276-hp, 3.3-liter
punchy 420-hp V8 or a slick 3.8-liter V6 engine matched with a six-speed
V6, both mated to an eight-speed PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE automatic. The roomy cabin is quiet, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
automatic. The K900 is like a $49,900-$61,900 NA but the ride is overly stiff and falls far $28,800-$41,900 70
traditional freeway cruiser: more Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA short of the Chrysler Pacifica, Honda Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4 MPG 20
comfortable floating along in a straight Odyssey, and Toyota Sienna. Handling
line than carving corners. If you’re looking for the cushy ride found in old is rather ungainly but ultimately secure. The interior is nicely finished and
Cadillacs or Oldsmobiles, this may be the car for you. The base infotainment inviting, with a new front console that provides handy concealed storage.
system uses a 9.2-inch screen, and top trims get a 12-inch display. A central The very comfortable second-row seats neither fold flat nor are they
controller manages the menus and selections, but it takes some getting used removable, cutting into cargo capacity. Available safety features include
to. The cabin is very roomy. Safety options include forward-collision warning, forward-collision warning and blind-spot and cross-traffic alert systems.
blind-spot monitoring, and rear cross-traffic alert. A rearview camera is standard.
Kia Niro Kia Sorento !

0
0 0
The new Kia Niro is a This SUV is among our
NA small, five-passenger 82 top-scoring midsized
front-wheel-drive hybrid SUVs. The Sorento is
OVERALL wagon/hatchback. It uses OVERALL functional and refined,
SCORE SCORE
a 1.6-liter four-cylinder and its wide price range
engine which, in conjunction with the makes it an alternative to small and
electric drive unit, puts out a combined PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE midsized SUVs. Three engines are PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
139 hp. This blend is mated to a $22,890-$29,650 NA available: the base 185-hp, 2.4-liter $25,400-$45,700 84
six-speed dual-clutch transmission, Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA four-cylinder; a 240-hp, 2.0-liter turbo Reliability 4 Satisfaction 4 MPG 21
and the 1.56-kWh lithium-ion battery is four; and the smooth and quiet
located under the rear seat. That allows for a flat cargo floor when the rear 290-hp, 3.3-liter V6. All are mated to a six-speed automatic. The cabin is
seats are folded. Kia claims the Niro will get 50 mpg combined in the EPA test quiet, and the ride is comfortable and composed. Handling is responsive and
cycle. A suite of advanced safety features will be available, including secure. Supportive seats and simple controls help make the Sorento easy to
automatic braking, smart cruise control, and blind-spot detection with rear live with. Available safety gear includes forward-collision warning, blind-spot
cross-traffic alert. An available infotainment system works with Android Auto detection, and rear cross-traffic alert, as well as a surround-view monitor.
and Apple CarPlay. Good crash-test results are a plus. Reliability has been above average.
Kia Optima !
0 Kia Soul !
0
0 0
Kia’s recently redesigned There is more to the boxy
85 Optima midsized sedan 71 Soul than quirky styling. It
packs a lot of substance packs abundant interior
OVERALL and value. It drives nicely, OVERALL space, with chairlike
SCORE SCORE
with a firm yet absorbent seats and big windows
ride and responsive, secure handling. providing an excellent view out.
The mainstream 2.4-liter four-cylinder PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE Though fundamentally a budget PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
is pleasant and unobtrusive, and $22,200-$36,090 86 hatchback, the Soul can be an SUV $16,100-$35,950 74
returned 28 mpg overall in our testing, Reliability 5 Satisfaction 5 MPG 28 alternative, functionality-wise. The Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 26
and the uplevel 2.0-liter turbo four driving experience isn’t special: The
packs more punch. New to the line is a 1.6-liter four-cylinder mated to a ride is stiff, and handling is sound but unexceptional. Power delivery from
seven-speed dual-clutch transmission. At around $26,000, the EX trim the 2.0-liter four-cylinder feels just adequate, and its 26 mpg overall is not
features comfortable leather seats, automatic climate control, a roomy rear outstanding. An extensive options list includes heated seats, touch-screen
seat, and heating for the seats and steering wheel. The controls are very navigation, and a backup camera. An electric version is available on the
intuitive to use. Low-positioned dash vents are our only gripe. The latest West Coast and in some northeastern states. Available safety gear includes
version of Kia’s UVO touch-screen infotainment system works with Android forward-collision and lane-departure warning systems. Reliability has been
Auto and Apple CarPlay. A hybrid is also available. average. With 2017 comes a more powerful 201-hp, 1.6-liter turbo engine.
Kia Rio Kia Sportage !

0
0 0
This sibling of the The redesigned Sportage
60 Hyundai Accent is 76 is a stylish and mildly
available as a sedan or sporty choice among
OVERALL hatchback. The 138-hp, OVERALL small SUVs. Most versions
SCORE SCORE
1.6-liter four-cylinder, are equipped with a
mated to a six-speed automatic, 2.4-liter four-cylinder, and the
produces sufficient power. Fuel PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE top-trim SX version sports a 2.0-liter PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
economy of 29 mpg overall with our $14,165-$20,905 64 turbocharged four-cylinder. Both $23,200-$34,200 78
hatchback and 30 mpg for the sedan is Reliability 3* Satisfaction 2 MPG 30 are mated to a smooth six-speed Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4 MPG 23
pretty unimpressive, however. The Rio’s automatic transmission. Though a
stiff ride and noisy cabin are typical of the genre and can get annoying during touch firm, the ride is composed and handling is responsive. Unlike the
long trips, but they aren’t unbearable. Handling is a strong suit, with the car similar Hyundai Tucson, the Sportage benefits from the pairing of a larger
feeling responsive in corners. Higher-trim models offer amenities such as engine and a conventional automatic transmission, which combine to give it
heated seats and a rearview camera, but these can push up the price steeply. smoother power delivery. The rear seat is roomy and the controls are easy to
Expect a redesigned Rio to arrive this spring. use, but visibility to the rear and side is difficult. The new Sportage scored a
Good in the IIHS small-overlap crash test.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Land Rover Discovery Land Rover Range

Rover Sport
0
This replacement for the
NA LR4 shares a platform
0
with the big Range Rover, Though the Sport has a
OVERALL
SCORE
not the Discovery Sport. 55 similar level of interior
It is designed to provide plushness as the stately
on-road civility with some off-road OVERALL Range Rover it is based
SCORE
prowess. The company claims its PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE upon, it focuses on PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
third row can readily accommodate $49,990-$73,950 NA handling prowess and less on ride $65,650-$111,350 74
full-sized adults, and the seats flip Reliability 1* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA comfort and off-road ability. Low-range Reliability 1* Satisfaction 4 MPG 18
and fold remotely for cargo-toting gearing is optional. Power comes from
flexibility. All three rows can be had with heated seats. Two engine are strong supercharged V6 or V8 engines
offered: a 340-hp, 3.0-liter supercharged V6 and a 254-hp, 3.0-liter mated to an eight-speed automatic. The Sport delivers an engaging driving
turbodiesel V6, both mated to an eight-speed automatic. The new Disco experience, with taut, agile handling, but the ride is stiff and choppy and
shed a whopping 1,000 pounds and should be less lumbering than the LR4, the exhaust note is over the top. Some controls are behind the times,
as well as more fuel-efficient. Despite the more urban-focused packaging, and the gear selector is unintuitive. Rear-seat room is generous, but the
the new Discovery touts more ground clearance than the previous version. optional third-row seat is tiny. A 254-hp, 3.0-liter V6 diesel and a stronger
The Discovery goes on sale this summer. SVR V8 are available.
Land Rover Discovery Sport Lexus CT 200h
0 0
From the storied Land This small hatchback has
43 Rover brand, one would 66 excellent fuel economy,
expect a more regal entry but its refinement isn’t
OVERALL into this hot market OVERALL up to the Lexus standard.
SCORE SCORE
segment. Instead, the A recent freshening
Discovery Sport struggles in brought styling updates and
comparisons against even mass- PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE mechanical tweaks that resulted in PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
market small SUVs. Power delivery $37,695-$46,595 58 claimed improvements to ride comfort $31,250-$32,980 65
from the turbo four-cylinder is spiky, Reliability 1* Satisfaction 3* MPG 21 and noise levels, two areas we found to Reliability 5 Satisfaction 3 MPG 40
with either too little or too much be problematic in our testing. Using
acceleration, and the transmission is neither smooth nor responsive. The the same powertrain as the previous-generation Prius, the CT’s 40 mpg is
Sport proved capable off-road, commendably ascending our rock hill and 4 mpg less than the roomier Toyota’s. The CT can drive solely on electric
trails. But the on-road ride is stiff, and handling is far from sporty. The austere power at low speed. Handling is responsive and secure, but the ride is stiff
cabin is rather plain for this luxury brand, and the infotainment system is slow and choppy. The cabin is well-assembled, with quality materials. But the rear
to respond. Based on Land Rover’s history, we predict that the reliability for seats are tight, cargo capacity is modest, and the view out back is limited.
this pricey, underachieving SUV is likely to be below average. Reliability has been outstanding.
Land Rover Range Rover Lexus ES !

0
0
Owners of any ultra- The Lexus ES is an
81
58 luxury sedan will feel right 82 upscale relative of the
at home in the Range Toyota Camry. It has
OVERALL Rover. The supercharged OVERALL sound handling but falls
SCORE SCORE
V6 and excellent short of being engaging
eight-speed automatic provide or fun. Uncharacteristic for Lexus, the
effortless motivation, and the air PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE ride is on the stiff side, and the optional PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
suspension swallows up bumps with $85,650-$199,950 80 18-inch wheels make it worse. The $38,900-$41,820 77-78
ease. Handling is responsive and Reliability 1* Satisfaction 3 MPG 17 powerful 3.5-liter V6 and six-speed Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 25-36
secure but not sporty. We averaged automatic got a good 25 mpg overall.
17 mpg overall, which isn’t great but is better than most rivals. Terrain-coping But we find the hybrid more appealing, thanks to its combination of size
mechanisms and adjustable ride height give it standout off-road abilities, and fuel economy, returning a class-leading 36 mpg overall and 44 on the
as well as the ability to lower the body for easier cabin access. Interior highway in our tests. Inside, the quiet cabin looks good at first, but some
furnishings and seats are first-rate, but the slow touch screen is complex. cheap touches are apparent. The mouselike infotainment interface is
A 254-hp turbodiesel V6 is well-mannered and provides ample power. A distracting and convoluted. Reliability has been excellent. For 2017,
hands-free system to open the tailgate is available. automatic emergency braking and lane-departure warning are standard.
Land Rover Range Lexus GS !

0
Rover Evoque
0
The GS competes well,
85 delivering a balanced
0
Overall, the Evoque combination of ride,
NA compact SUV is more OVERALL
SCORE
handling, quietness, and
about style than function. roominess. Engaging to
OVERALL We tested a four-door drive, the car’s good handling and
SCORE
Evoque with the old PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE taut yet supple ride fare well against PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
six-speed automatic and got 21 mpg $41,800-$62,500 NA German rivals. Its strong 3.5-liter V6 $46,310-$83,940 83
overall. The now-standard nine-speed Reliability 1* Satisfaction 2* MPG NA returned 21 mpg overall in our tests. Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 21
automatic was neither smooth nor Rear-drive versions get an eight-speed
responsive in the similar Discovery automatic, and AWD versions get a six-speed automatic. A hybrid with a CVT
Sport we tested. The Evoque’s ride is choppy, and noise levels are elevated. is also available. Interior space is on par for the class, and the cabin is nicely
Interior room and visibility are sacrificed for the striking silhouette. Controls furnished. A distracting mouselike controller works the infotainment systems.
are a bit quirky. Handling is sprightly but becomes disconcerting at the limits. A rear-drive 200t with a turbo four-cylinder and a high-performance GS F
The Evoque’s Terrain Response system facilitates moderate off-road with a 467-hp V8 are available. For 2017, the Lexus Safety System+ is
capability. Updates include optional lane-keeping assist, the addition of the standard, including automatic emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring.
InControl infotainment system, and new seats.

Profiles
Lexus GX !
0 Lexus LX
0 0
Like its Toyota 4Runner This luxury SUV is based
75 corporate cousin, the GX NA on the Toyota Land
460 is among the few Cruiser, itself quite plush
OVERALL remaining old-school OVERALL and upscale. Power
SCORE SCORE
SUVs that use a comes from a strong
body-on-frame design. It is very quiet 5.7-liter V8 also found in the Tundra
and quick for a hulking brute, yet the PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE pickup. It has a comfortable ride and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
GX is highly capable off-road and has a $51,280-$62,980 70 a quiet, plush, and well-assembled $89,380 NA
high tow rating. The 4.6-liter V8 engine Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 17 cabin. Handling is lackluster but Reliability 5* Satisfaction 4 MPG NA
and six-speed automatic make for a ultimately secure. The Land Cruiser we
slick powertrain but got a paltry 17 mpg overall. Handling is lumbering but tested got only 14 mpg overall but was very capable off-road. Like the Toyota,
ultimately secure. The ride is very comfortable, although the body tends to the LX has an off-road crawl mode that manages throttle and braking over
jostle when driving over uneven pavement. Inside, the cabin is plush and tough terrain. The height-adjustable suspension further enables the LX to
well-finished. The small third-row seat folds neatly into the floor when it’s not traverse off-road. But the power-folding third-row seat folds up to the sides,
in use, but the side-swinging rear door can be inconvenient at times. limiting cargo space. For 2017, the Lexus Safety System+, which includes
Reliability has consistently been above average. automatic emergency braking and lane-departure warning, is standard.
Lexus IS Lexus NX !
0
0
In our tests, the IS came Based on the Toyota
74
66 up short as a sports 76 RAV4, the compact NX
sedan. Handling is secure delivers a less opulent
OVERALL but not engaging enough OVERALL driving experience than
SCORE SCORE
to run with the best in the typical Lexus.
the class. Ride comfort is neither tied Handling is responsive, but the ride is
down nor plush. Even the punchy PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE more firm than cosseting and cabin PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
IS 350 is underwhelming to drive. A $37,325-$46,100 56 noise isn’t particularly hushed. The $35,085-$39,720 71-74
255-hp V6 powers the IS 300, which Reliability 5 Satisfaction 2 MPG 20 NX 200t’s 2.0-liter turbocharged Reliability 5 Satisfaction 3 MPG 24-29
gives it more zip, but its fuel economy four-cylinder works well and delivers
of 20 mpg overall is uncompetitive in the class. Still, the interior is extremely 24 mpg overall. The NX 300h hybrid returns 29 mpg overall, making it
cramped, and getting in and out is an ungraceful chore. All-wheel-drive one of the most fuel-efficient SUVs we’ve ever tested, but it feels a bit
versions have a pronounced hump by the driver’s right leg. Fit and finish is underpowered. Snazzy details lend the interior some appeal, but a number
okay but not a standout, and the mouselike infotainment controller is of cheap touches remain. Front cabin room is tight, and the styling
distracting to use. A 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder is available, but only in compromises rear visibility and crimps cargo space. The infotainment
rear-wheel drive. Reliability has been above average, but the IS scores too low system’s fussy touchpad is frustrating and distracting to use when driving.
to be recommended. Reliability has been well above average.
Lexus LC Lexus RC
0 0
Lexus’s new halo car is This aggressively styled
NA the six-figure LC 500 NA coupe offers seating
Coupe, a 2+2 luxury car for four passengers of
OVERALL that is likely to compete OVERALL diminutive stature.
SCORE SCORE
with the Mercedes-Benz Essentially a coupe
S550 Coupe and BMW 650i coupe. version of the IS sedan, the RC uses
The 5.0-liter V8 engine is borrowed PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE a standard 3.5-liter V6 engine hooked PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
from the high-performance GS F sedan $92,000-$96,510 NA up to an eight-speed automatic. An $40,155-$64,165 NA
and RC F coupe, generating 471 hp and Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA all-wheel-drive version is available Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG NA
398 lb.-ft. of torque. Power is sent to with a six-speed automatic. Top-trim
the rear wheels through a close-ratio 10-speed automatic transmission, RC F versions, fitted with a 467-hp, 5.0-liter V8, target the BMW M4. That
enabling a claimed 0 to 60 mph sprint of less than 4.5 seconds. A 3.5-liter V6 prodigious output is routed to the rear wheels with a torque-vectoring
hybrid version has also been introduced. It will go on sale this spring with a differential, which sends power to the tire that has the most grip. The
typical price of about $100,000. A convertible version may follow. RC F is super-quick, with a loud exhaust bark. The various driving modes
sharpen throttle and steering response, but the car’s weight ultimately
compromises its agility.
Lexus LS !
0 Lexus RX !
0
0
The Lexus flagship sedan The RX has avant-garde
79
87 delivers luxurious, highly 81 exterior styling and lots of
refined, and fuss-free advanced safety features.
OVERALL motoring with a OVERALL Its 3.5-liter V6 is linked to
SCORE SCORE
comfortable and serene an eight-speed automatic,
ride. It has an exceptionally quiet cabin delivering ample power and a
and is laden with features. Fit and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE commendable 22 mpg overall. The PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
finish is excellent. Its recent freshening $72,520-$120,400 89 fuel-thrifty 450h hybrid gets an $43,020-$56,645 77-80
made handling a bit more responsive Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 21 excellent 29 mpg overall. Inside, the Reliability 4 Satisfaction 5 MPG 22-29
while retaining the silky ride. The RX is very quiet and well-finished. Ride
strong V8 and eight-speed automatic deliver a very smooth and responsive comfort is plush, whether you get the base car on 18-inch tires or more
package. The extended-length version has generous rear-seat room. A uplevel versions with 20-inch tires. Handling, however, is ponderous and
self-parking feature and all-wheel drive are optional. The LS 600h hybrid devoid of any sporty feel but ultimately secure. The mouselike controller and
comes with standard AWD. Despite retaining some conventional knobs and distracting interface require a steep learning curve. Rear passengers get lots
buttons, the mouse-controlled infotainment system is complicated and of leg and knee room. For 2017, the Lexus Safety System+, which includes
distracting to use. A redesign, powered by a twin-turbo V6 and outfitted with automatic emergency braking and lane-departure warning, is standard.
a swoopier body, comes later in 2017.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Lincoln Continental Lincoln MKZ !

0
0 0
Based on the Based on the engaging
NA accomplished Lincoln 81 Ford Fusion, the upscale
MKZ, the Continental Lincoln MKZ is updated
OVERALL nameplate returns as an OVERALL for the 2017 model year
SCORE SCORE
all-new high-tech flagship with new engines, a
sedan. The base engine is a lackluster plusher ride, simplified controls, and
3.7-liter V6. The 2.7-liter twin-turbo V6, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE a more conveniently located trunk PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
however, packs a lot of punch. The $44,560-$68,180 NA release. Base models get a 2.0-liter $35,170-$53,720 88
top-level gets a 400-hp, 3.0-liter Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA turbo four-cylinder that provides ample Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 23-34
twin-turbo V6. Front-wheel drive is power. In our tests the hybrid got
standard, with all-wheel drive optional. The ride is very comfortable, and the 34 mpg overall. For more punch, the available 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6 puts out
cabin is super-quiet. Handling is quite responsive, particularly for such a large 400 hp when paired with all-wheel drive, and 350 hp on front-drive versions.
sedan. The cabin is nicely finished and very roomy, particularly in the back. The MKZ delivers a comfortable ride. Inside is a quiet, luxurious cabin with
The standard front seats look unusual and compromise support. Some comfortable seats, but it’s a long reach to the push-button gear selector and
controls are odd, such as the push-button gear selector and the electronic the rear seat is snug. Available automatic emergency braking and pedestrian
buttons that are used instead of an interior door handle. In terms of pricing, detection bolster the Lincoln’s safety credentials.
the Continental competes with luxury midsized sedans.
Lincoln MKC Lincoln Navigator
0 0
The MKC includes luxury This more luxurious
54 and high-tech features, 69 version of the Ford
but this Ford Escape- Expedition is neither as
OVERALL based model falls short OVERALL quiet nor as plush as its
SCORE SCORE
of the class leaders. GM competitors, but
Power is strong, particularly from it offers a much more comfortable
the 2.3-liter turbo four-cylinder, but PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE third-row seat and is more reliable than PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
that engine returned just 19 mpg $32,880-$48,040 72 GM’s offerings. The 3.5-liter turbo V6 $63,515-$76,910 72
overall in our tests. That, combined Reliability 1 Satisfaction 3 MPG 19 delivers smoother, more effortless Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4 MPG 15
with the small gas tank, results in a power delivery than the old V8 that it
short cruising range. The six-speed automatic’s push-button shifter is replaced, and it returned 15 mpg in our testing. Handling is ungainly but
inconveniently located far up on the dash. None of the adaptive suspension secure. The Navigator rides comfortably, but wind noise is excessive. The
modes make for a truly comfortable ride. Handling is secure but trails its interior looks dated, and there is no hiding the Navigator’s pickup-truck roots.
German rivals. A quiet cabin, plush trim, easy access, and decent rear-seat Both regular- and long-wheelbase versions are available. The motorized
room enhance livability, but rear visibility is limited. Sync 3 has replaced running boards help access to the tall cabin. Sync 3 has replaced the
the convoluted MyLincoln Touch infotainment system. Reliability has been much-maligned MyLincoln Touch infotainment system.
well below average.
Lincoln MKT Maserati Ghibli
0 0
This three-row SUV is Although the Ghibli is
NA based on the Ford Flex, 48 based on a Chrysler 300,
with a similarly roomy this four-door coupe has
OVERALL interior and a more OVERALL its own character. The
SCORE SCORE
stylized shape. Base Ferrari-developed V6
models are equipped with a lackluster turbo is mated to an eight-speed
3.7-liter V6. We tested the uplevel PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE automatic. The uplevel SQ-4 PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
3.5-liter turbo V6 version, which was $43,370-$45,365 NA all-wheel-drive version we tested uses $71,600-$79,700 71
quick and returned 18 mpg overall. The Reliability 3* Satisfaction 3* MPG NA a 404-hp version. Handling is sporty Reliability 1* Satisfaction 2* MPG 19
ride is comfortable but stiffer than that and agile, the brakes are strong, and
of the Flex, and the MKT is cumbersome at its cornering limits. The interior the engine emits a thrilling bark. But the stiff ride can grow fatiguing, the rear
is very roomy, plush, and quiet. But visibility and the driving position are seat is cramped, and the Ghibli is louder than most sporty luxury sedans.
compromised, and the third-row seats are best suited for kids. A wide turning Climbing into or out of this low-slung sports sedan can be a challenge. The
circle and overall length hamper maneuverability. Sync 3 replaces the interior is fitted out with high-quality leather and suede, and most controls
much-maligned MyLincoln Touch infotainment system. are easy to use, except for the unintuitive shifter. Chrysler’s Uconnect touch
screen is a plus, but it’s hard not to notice some cheap-looking switches,
sourced from the Chrysler parts bins.
Lincoln MKX Maserati Levante
0 0
Based on the capable Ford The Levante is Maserati’s
66 Edge, the Lincoln MKX is NA first-ever SUV, built on the
one of the best-scoring same platform as the
OVERALL luxury SUVs in our testing. OVERALL Ghibli and Quattroporte
SCORE SCORE
This is a quiet, refined, and sedans. Pricing starts at
high-tech vehicle. The standard 303-hp, $72,000 for the 345-hp, V6 base
3.7-liter V6 feels a bit unremarkable, and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE model and reaches $83,000 for the PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
the optional 335-hp, 2.7-liter turbo V6 is $38,100-$57,970 87 424-hp S version. The Levante delivers $72,000-$83,000 NA
smooth and delivers effortless thrust. Reliability 2 Satisfaction 4 MPG 18 a thrilling sound from the Ferrari- Reliability 1* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
The only knock against the MKX is its developed engine, with nimble,
rather unimpressive fuel economy of 18 mpg overall. Handling is athletic, athletic handling and, courtesy of the standard air suspension, a steady ride.
making the MKX fun to drive. The ride is steady and composed. Tall drivers will Interior features include a version of Chrysler’s Uconnect system with an
probably find that the push-button shifter is a long reach away. The very quiet 8.4-inch touch screen and a stunning cabin that’s wrapped in leather, suede,
cabin feels first-class, with abundant wood, brushed metal, and leather and wood, with comfortable seats and nice detailed stitching. However, the
surfaces. Convenience and safety features include automatic emergency shifter is unintuitive to use. Safety gear includes forward-collision warning
braking, lane-keeping assist, and cross-traffic alert. First-year reliability of the with brake assist and lane-departure warning.
redesign has been below average.

Profiles
Mazda3 !
0 Mazda CX-9 !
0
0 0
Whether as a sedan or Mazda’s CX-9 is a stylish
72 hatchback, the Mazda3 is 74 three-row SUV that is
fun to drive, thanks to its quite engaging to drive.
OVERALL perky handling and an OVERALL Power comes from a
SCORE SCORE
engine that tends to sing responsive, free-revving
rather than buzz. At 33 mpg, the 227-hp, 2.5-liter turbo four-cylinder
Mazda3 is one of the most fuel- PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE mated to a smooth six-speed PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
efficient vehicles in the compact class. $17,845-$24,945 72-73 automatic. This engine is rated at $31,520-$44,015 80
It also offers a host of luxury features Reliability 4 Satisfaction 4 MPG 32-33 250 hp if you use premium fuel, but Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG 22
rarely matched by any other compact there’s no reason to do so. We got
car, including a multimedia system with a large center screen and active 22 mpg overall. Mazda’s flagship SUV has nimble handling that makes it
safety features such as a blind-spot monitoring system. On the downside, feel like a smaller vehicle. The ride is very comfortable, and the cabin is
the car tends to be loud on the highway, and ride comfort isn’t stellar. The commendably quiet. The interior is well-finished, particularly on high-end
infotainment system controls can be daunting at first and take a while to trims, and features comfortable seats, but the cockpit is snug and power-seat
master, and the Toyota Corolla and Volkswagen Jetta have roomier rear seats. adjustments are limited. Mazda’s dial-controlled infotainment system takes
Reliability has been above average. time to master. Available safety features include automatic emergency
braking and blind-spot monitoring.
Mazda6 !
0 Mazda MX-5 Miata !
0
0 0
Sporty yet sparing with The fourth-generation
77 fuel, the Mazda6’s 2.5-liter 79 Miata remains true to
four-cylinder delivered Mazda’s original formula
OVERALL 32 mpg overall in our OVERALL of a lightweight,
SCORE SCORE
tests, the best fuel rear-wheel-drive roadster.
economy among conventional Although 155 hp from the 2.0-liter four
midsized sedans. The six-speed PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE doesn’t sound impressive, the Miata PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
automatic is very smooth and delivers $21,945-$30,695 79 quickly scoots along while returning a $24,915-$34,925 80
quick shifts. We found the 6 to be Reliability 4 Satisfaction 4 MPG 32 miserly 34 mpg overall. Shifting the Reliability 4 Satisfaction 5 MPG 34
responsive and capable in the corners. delightfully accurate six-speed manual
The ride is taut and steady but on the firm side, and the cabin is rather loud shifter is a joy; we’d skip the optional automatic, though it works fine. Quick
for the class, despite some recent tweaks Mazda has made to address this. and precise steering delivers sublime back-road handling, even though
The car received a recent mild freshening that includes a new dash and a some body roll is noticeable. High levels of noise, thin and unsupportive
center display screen that is operated via a central knob on the console, seats, and a stiff ride all grow fatiguing during highway travel. Cabin space
which takes practice to master. A head-up display is optional. is snug, and the optional dial-controlled infotainment system takes time to
master. Flipping the convertible top open or closed is a breeze.
Mazda CX-3 !
0 Mercedes-Benz B-Class ED
0 0
Mazda’s entry in the The B-Class Electric Drive
64 mini-utility segment NA is the first all-electric car
delivers agile, fun-to-drive that Mercedes-Benz has
OVERALL handling; a solid and OVERALL offered in the U.S. It has
SCORE SCORE
substantial feel; and good about 85 miles of range,
fuel economy. The ride is firm but and its 36-kWh lithium-ion battery can
does a good job absorbing impacts, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE be replenished in 4 hours. The B-Class PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
although noise levels can be high. The $19,960-$26,240 64 seats five, and the battery pack doesn’t $39,900 NA
CX-3 is available with front- or all-wheel Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 28 intrude on passenger or cargo space. Reliability 3* Satisfaction 3* MPG NA
drive, and the sole powertrain is a However, the car feels rather outdated,
146-hp, 2.0-liter four-cylinder and a six-speed automatic. It’s a smooth, willing due in part to its stiff ride and clumsy handling, and it’s neither particularly
mill but isn’t overly powerful. The infotainment system includes a 7-inch quick nor very quiet. A number of advanced safety and convenience features
center display screen and a rotary knob to control phone and audio are available, including a system that lets the driver check on the charging
functions, but it takes time to get familiar with its operation. The rear seat is status via a smartphone. As with all EVs, the B-Class electric qualifies for a
very tight, and cargo space is modest. This is the first nonluxury mini-SUV to $7,500 federal tax incentive.
offer blind-spot monitoring and adaptive cruise control.
Mazda CX-5 !
0 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
0 0
Spry and fuel-efficient, This competitive sports
74 Mazda’s small SUV is 67 sedan is enjoyable to
rewarding to drive drive and has a beautifully
OVERALL and is reliable. Nimble OVERALL finished interior. The base
SCORE SCORE
handling and a taut ride— C300 uses a 2.0-liter
combined with ample power from the turbo four-cylinder, which returned a
2.5-liter, 184-hp four-cylinder—make PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE respectable 26 mpg overall in our AWD PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
it fun to drive. The one downside $21,795-$29,870 74 version. The C has quick reflexes, with $39,500-$80,850 85
is that the cabin is louder than Reliability 4 Satisfaction 3 MPG 25 prompt steering response and a Reliability 2 Satisfaction 3 MPG 26
most in the segment. A complex comfortable ride. Inside, you’ll find an
dial-controlled infotainment system takes some time to master. A less upscale and snazzy cabin with a high-quality feel, but the complex
powerful 2.0-liter four comes only with FWD and a manual transmission. infotainment system takes time to master. Semi-autonomous highway
Cabin and cargo space are plentiful, seats are comfortable, and visibility is steering is optional, and autonomous braking is standard. The rip-roaring
good—aided by standard blind-spot monitoring on higher trims. The Grand C63 AMG gets a 469-hp twin-turbo V8 in standard form or 503-hp in the
Touring trim offers forward-collision warning with autobraking. This is a S version. Additional variants include a C350e plug-in hybrid, C300d diesel,
viable choice against a VW Tiguan or Ford Escape. A redesigned CX-5 goes and C43 AMG with a 3.0-liter turbo V6. Reliability has been below average.
on sale this spring. A new coupe version is available for 2017.
1 2 3 4 5 !
Mercedes-Benz CLA Mercedes-Benz GLC !

0
0 0
Don’t let the three- Based on the current
51 pointed star confuse you. 79 C-Class, the GLC is one of
Most mainstream sedans, the best compact luxury
OVERALL let alone a typical OVERALL SUVs on the market. Plush
SCORE SCORE
Mercedes-Benz, deliver a furnishings inside the
better driving experience than the quiet cabin prove appealing, although
CLA. The engine and transmission lack PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE it also has Mercedes’ complex PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
refinement. At first the powertrain feels $32,400-$49,950 64 infotainment system. The front seats $39,150-$54,900 81
unresponsive, then the power comes Reliability 2* Satisfaction 2 MPG 28 are very comfortable and supportive, Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 22
on abruptly. Though the car is agile, but the rear is a bit snug. The 2.0-liter
the ride is punishingly stiff and the CLA is loud inside. Cabin access is turbo four-cylinder delivers ample power and is matched to a nine-speed
difficult, and the well-appointed interior is cramped. The heavily promoted automatic that works well. The GLC rides comfortably and handles with
base price is something of a tease; buyers need to spend a lot on options to athleticism. Automatic braking is standard, but other safety gear—such as
get the luxury features expected on a premium model. Prices can rise to blind-spot monitoring and cross-traffic alert—comes in confusing option
the $50,000 range for an available 375-hp AMG CLA45 version that sounds packages. A turbo V6 AMG GL43 and a coupelike SUV, the GLC Coupe, are
more exciting on paper than it feels behind the wheel. also available. First-year reliability has been well above average.
Mercedes-Benz CLS Mercedes-Benz GLE
0 0
The extensively freshened Renamed from the
NA CLS gets a new 329-hp, 68 M-Class, the GLE is a
twin-turbo 3.0-liter V6 capable and luxurious
OVERALL hooked up to a OVERALL midsized SUV. The
SCORE SCORE
seven-speed automatic GLE350 comes with a
for the base powertrain. The 550 gets a 3.5-liter, 302-hp V6 that delivers
402-hp, 4.7-liter twin-turbo V8 mated PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE smooth and powerful acceleration with PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
to a new nine-speed automatic. An $66,900-$107,800 NA 18 mpg overall and generous towing $52,000-$108,840 75
AMG version with a 577-hp, 5.5-liter V8 Reliability 3* Satisfaction 3* MPG NA capacity. A four-cylinder turbodiesel is Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4 MPG 18
delivers ferocious acceleration. also available. Supple and composed,
Handling is capable and surprisingly agile for such a large car. The ride is firm the GLE rides well and is quiet inside. Steering response is quick but comes
but supple and steady. The coupelike styling results in a low roof and small up short on feedback. The first-rate interior finish and the well-padded,
windows, reducing interior space. That limits cabin access, hurts visibility, supportive seats are interior highlights, but the infotainment system is
and compromises rear-seat room. Noise levels are hushed. Fit and finish is complex. Automatic emergency braking is standard. A plug-in hybrid version
excellent, but the controls are complicated. All-wheel drive is available. is said to deliver 18 miles of all-electric driving.
Mercedes-Benz E-Class Mercedes-Benz GLS
0 0
The redesigned E-Class Mercedes’ seven-
74 delivers nimbler handling 57 passenger SUV is
and better fuel economy freshened for the 2017
OVERALL than the previous OVERALL model year, with revised
SCORE SCORE
generation. On the other interior and exterior
hand, it dials back on ride comfort, styling, a nine-speed automatic, an
interior room, and user-friendliness. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE upgraded air suspension, and the PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
The E300’s 241-hp, 2.0-liter turbo $52,150-$72,400 85 addition of the current—and more $68,700-$124,100 82
four-cylinder is linked to a nine-speed Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG 24 complex—Mercedes-Benz infotainment Reliability 1* Satisfaction 4* MPG 20
automatic. This combination works well, system. Our last tested GL was plush
but it won’t set your heart on fire. Then again, we got a commendable 24 mpg and quiet, with supportive seats and a third-row seat that was roomy
overall. The car is quiet and handles with newfound agility. Though the ride is enough for adults. It had a steady and comfortable ride, but the GL proved
comfortable, it lost some plushness. Inside, the dash features high-resolution very clumsy when pushed to its handling limits. Engines include a
displays, but the controls have grown more complicated. Even adjusting the 255-hp V6 diesel; a 362-hp, 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6; and a 4.7-liter V8 that
seat’s lumbar support is a multistep process done through the central puts out 449 hp. The flagship AMG GLS63 churns out 577 hp. Available
controller and screen. New technology gives the E-Class the ability to follow safety equipment includes cross-traffic alert, blind-spot warning, and
the road and steer itself temporarily as a driver-assist feature. lane-keeping assist.
Mercedes-Benz GLA Mercedes-Benz S-Class
0 0
Essentially a raised The S-Class is brimming
66 hatchback version of the 68 with features and qualities
CLA sedan, the GLA that make it stand out
OVERALL performed better in our OVERALL among luxury cars. A
SCORE SCORE
tests than its sibling. It powerful 4.7-liter turbo V8
got 26 mpg overall from the 2.0-liter provides effortless acceleration and
turbo four-cylinder. But the seven- PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE delivered 18 mpg overall in our tests. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
speed dual-clutch automatic is $32,850-$49,900 70 The S550 brings a whole host of $96,600-$247,900 96
unrefined, and power delivery is not Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 26 advanced technology, including the Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 18
even. This makes the GLA feel lethargic ability to follow the road and stop by
at first, then power comes on abruptly. Handling is nimble, but the ride is itself in an emergency. The ride is very plush and steady—the best we’ve
stiff and the cabin is loud. Visibility, particularly to the rear, is poor, and ever tested—and the cabin is ultrahushed. Along with the seats and steering
headroom is snug. Safety features include a forward-collision mitigation wheel, the door and center armrests are heated as well. Even though the
system. Automatic emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring are S-Class is large and posh, handling agility is commendable. Many controls
optional. A front-drive version and a high-performance 375-hp GLA45 are are overly complicated, however. A coupe version is available, as is a plug-in
available. The infotainment system has become more complicated for 2017 hybrid. Reliability has been well below average.
but is now compatible with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay.

Profiles
Mercedes-Benz SL Mini Cooper Countryman
0 0
The drop-top SL has In March a new
NA several changes for 2017, NA Countryman based on the
including styling updates Clubman will go on sale
OVERALL and more horsepower. OVERALL in Cooper and Cooper S
SCORE SCORE
The entry-level SL450’s versions. Engine choices
twin-turbo 3.0-liter V6 engine gets a are a base 1.5-liter turbo three-cylinder
boost to 362 hp and is mated to a new PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE and a 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder for PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
nine-speed automatic. The next step $86,950-$219,850 NA the S. Front- and all-wheel drives are $26,600-$31,600 NA
up the SL ladder, the SL550, is Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA offered. In June an all-wheel-drive Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
powered by twin-turbo 4.7-liter V8, plug-in hybrid version follows, with a
now making 449 hp. The monster AMG models—SL63 and SL65—make due promised all-electric range of 24 miles. This SUV-like Countryman has grown
with 577-hp, twin-turbo 5.5-liter V8 and 621-hp, twin-turbo 6.0-liter V12 longer than the original, bringing in more interior space and flexibility. The
engines, respectfully. The SL is a luxury roadster with a foldable hardtop that’s optional Mini Driving Assistant system includes forward-collision warning
comfortable and quiet. One neat feature is a roof panel that offers varying with low-speed automatic emergency braking, pedestrian warning with brake
degrees of opacity. Safety features include automatic emergency braking, assist, and automatic high beams.
blind-spot detection, and lane-keeping assist.
Mercedes-Benz SLC Mitsubishi Lancer
0 0
For 2017, the updated SLK Despite its recent
NA also gets a new name: 61 face-lift, the Lancer is
SLC. It features a an outdated and
OVERALL retractable hardtop that OVERALL insubstantial compact
SCORE SCORE
does a great job at sedan. The 2.0-liter
keeping the interior quiet. The SLK250 four-cylinder engine is rough, the
we tested had a 1.8-liter turbo PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE continuously variable transmission PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
four-cylinder that delivered ample $47,950-$61,300 NA makes the car moan plaintively, fuel $17,795-$22,095 62
thrust, and the new SLC300 uses a Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA economy is uncompetitive, and the car Reliability 3* Satisfaction 2* MPG 25
more powerful 2.0-liter engine coupled is sluggish from a stop. Handling is
to a nine-speed automatic. There is a more powerful V6 SLC43 version. The secure, but the ride is a bit rough. The cramped cabin is furnished with drab
SLK has crisp, enjoyable handling, with rock-solid body control and plastics and has subpar fit and finish, but the controls are simple to use.
communicative steering. It can be both challenging and rewarding when All-wheel drive is available. Sadly, the high-performance, rally-ready Evolution
driven on a track. The ride is firm but refined enough even for lengthy trips. version is no more.
The tight cabin is well-finished, with excellent seats that feature warm-air vents
in the head restraints to keep your neck warm during chilly top-down drives.
Mini Cooper Mitsubishi Mirage
0
Minis are quirky and fun Its rock-bottom sticker
58
66 to drive, whether you 37 price and thrifty fuel
have the classic two-door economy of 37 mpg
OVERALL or the more practical OVERALL overall conjure an inviting
SCORE SCORE
four-door version. Base image of an economical
Coopers use a turbocharged runabout. But that mirage quickly
three-cylinder that sounds a bit PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE dissipates when you drive this tiny, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
gravelly and returned 31 mpg overall $20,950-$35,600 68-81 tinny car. Minor updates for 2017 bring $12,995-$16,995 29
with the six-speed automatic. The Reliability 2 Satisfaction 4 MPG 30-31 a sedan body style, a hint more power, Reliability 3* Satisfaction 2* MPG 37
more powerful and nicer-sounding and Android Auto and Apple CarPlay,
Cooper S uses a four-cylinder turbo and got 30 mpg with the six-speed along with supposedly upgraded brakes. Yet those enhancements don’t mask
manual. Handling is nimble and sporty, making all versions fun to drive. The the weak, vibrating three-cylinder engine that delivers sluggish acceleration
ride is rather firm, however, and road noise is noticeable. Controls take some and a raspy chorus of lament or the car’s clumsy handling. Though it’s
getting used to, and the backseat is still tiny. Options easily push the price relatively roomy, the depressing cabin feels drab, cheap, and insubstantial. In
past $30,000. A high-performance John Cooper Works bumps the power to the end, there is no compelling reason to buy a Mirage and, for the money,
228 hp and gets firmer suspension. Reliability has dropped to below average. there are many much better used cars for the same price.
Mini Cooper Clubman Mitsubishi Outlander
0 0
The Clubman is a longer Outdated and outclassed,
57 and wider version of the 60 the Outlander struggles
four-door Cooper and to compete. Its high point
OVERALL shares its platform with OVERALL is a standard tiny
SCORE SCORE
the BMW X1. Engine third-row seat, rare in this
choices include a slightly wheezy- class. Though the ride is absorbent, it
sounding three-cylinder turbo in PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE is also buoyant and doesn’t feel tied PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
the base car or a quicker and more $24,100-$29,450 67 down. Handling is clumsy, with slow $23,495-$40,000E 59
enjoyable-sounding four-cylinder turbo Reliability 2* Satisfaction 5 MPG 28 steering response and lots of body Reliability 3* Satisfaction 2* MPG 24
in the S. The base Clubman we tested lean in corners. The base 166-hp,
posted a very good 28 mpg overall. Handling is quite nimble, but the ride is 2.4-liter four-cylinder is mated to a CVT that amplifies the engine’s howl when
very firm and road noise is pronounced. Unlike the regular Coopers, the you ask for power. Acceleration is leisurely at 10 seconds from 0 to 60 mph,
Clubman’s backseat is actually habitable. Controls take some getting used to, though its 24 mpg overall is competitive. Top-tier GT trims get a 224-hp,
and the rear view is compromised by the two rear barn doors. With typical 3.0-liter V6 and six-speed automatic. Forward-collision warning and
options, the Clubman is priced in the low-$30,000s and the S can easily get lane-departure warning are available on some trims. The upcoming plug-in
to the high-$30,000s. An all-wheel-drive version is available on the S. hybrid will cost more than $40,000.
1 2 3 4 5 !
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport Nissan Frontier
0 0
This shortened version of Dating back to 2005, the
NA the Outlander has less NA compact Frontier pickup
rear-seat room and cargo truck shares a platform
OVERALL space. Despite the OVERALL with the discontinued
SCORE SCORE
name, when it comes to Xterra SUV and the
driving it’s not exactly a sporty SUV. previous-generation larger Titan
Handling isn’t that nimble, and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE pickup. In our tests we found the PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
acceleration is just adequate. In $19,795-$27,695 NA Frontier to be quick and relatively $18,406-$36,410 NA
addition to the 2.0-liter engine, a more Reliability 3* Satisfaction 2 MPG NA nimble, with a stiff though tolerable Reliability 3 Satisfaction 2 MPG NA
powerful 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine ride. The strong 4.0-liter V6 revved
is available. The Sport’s choppy ride and very noisy cabin further detract from smoothly and felt very strong, but fuel economy was a decidedly
the driving experience. Still, it has a commanding seating position, as well as unimpressive 15 mpg overall. A 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine powers base
passenger and cargo versatility. Top-trim all-wheel-drive versions can get models. Only crew- and extended-cab body styles are offered, but rear-seat
expensive enough that the Outlander Sport starts to compete with better room is tight even in the crew cab. A model with a longer pickup bed is
SUVs. Recent updates include a redesigned steering wheel, a new 6.1-inch available, but the tailgate is very heavy. A redesign is in the pipeline.
audio display, and new fabric for the seats.
Mitsubishi i-MiEV Nissan Juke
0 0
The i-MiEV is one of the The funky-looking Juke
44 cheapest all-electric NA has the raised ride height
cars available. But and optional AWD of
OVERALL the downside is an OVERALL an SUV, but with very
SCORE SCORE
underdeveloped vehicle carlike handling and
that is slow, clumsy, stiff-riding, and maneuverability. The steeply raked rear
plebeian inside. It takes between 6 and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE quarter makes for lousy visibility aft. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
7 hours to charge on a 240-volt, Level 2 $22,995 35 The rear seat is tight, and the trifling $20,250-$30,020 NA
charger, or 21 hours on a standard Reliability 3* Satisfaction 2* MPG 111 cargo space limits practicality. Tidy Reliability 3* Satisfaction 2 MPG NA
110-volt charger. Its range is EPA-rated handling and Nissan’s punchy 1.6-liter
at 62 miles, although we generally got around 59 miles. We measured its turbo four-cylinder make it fun and zippy. Its 24 mpg overall isn’t bad, but the
energy consumption at 111 mpg equivalent. The motor puts out a meager need for premium fuel is a downer. A continuously variable transmission is
66 hp. In comparison, the five-seat Nissan Leaf—with its roomier interior, standard. As in some sporty hatchbacks, a noisy cabin and stiff ride come
more comfortable ride, and longer driving range—feels like a real car and is with the territory. The Juke scored a Poor in the IIHS small-overlap crash test.
a far better choice. A modest restyling took place for 2015.
Nissan Altima Nissan Leaf
0
This rather generic The all-electric Leaf that
67
72 though roomy sedan uses 62 we tested has a 75-mile
a continuously variable typical range. A full
OVERALL transmission that works OVERALL charge took us 6 hours
SCORE SCORE
well when loafing around using a 240-volt outlet,
but dilutes the driving experience. In but charge times have been shortened
our tests we got a decent 29 mpg PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE since our tests. We measured the PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
overall in the 2.5-liter four-cylinder, and $22,500-$32,690 71-80 equivalent of 106 mpg, and running $30,680-$36,790 71
the 3.5-liter V6 returned 24 mpg Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 24-29 costs are 3.5 cents per mile at the Reliability 4 Satisfaction 3 MPG 106
overall. Handling feels mushy and saps national average of 11 cents per kWh.
confidence with its overly light steering, though it is ultimately secure. The ride is comfortable, but handling isn’t particularly agile. The rear seat is
The ride is superficially soft, but over sharp bumps the suspension loses its roomy, but the cargo area is rather small. Standard features include a heated
absorbency. Controls are easy to use, but the infotainment system is fussy steering wheel and seats, and top models get electric heating that uses
to use and limits phone interaction only to voice commands. Blind-spot and 30 percent less energy. For 2017, the Leaf has a bigger standard 30-kWh
lane-departure warning systems are available. Reliability has improved to battery with a claimed 107-mile range. Reliability has been above average, but
average, but the Altima scored too low in our testing to recommend. we can’t recommend the Leaf because it scored a Poor in the IIHS small-
overlap crash test. A redesign is due to be introduced soon.
Nissan Armada Nissan Maxima !

0
0 0
This less expensive The Maxima continues
59 version of the Infiniti 72 to use Nissan’s smooth,
QX80 is powered by a powerful 3.5-liter V6,
OVERALL slick and powerful OVERALL which is a highlight of
SCORE SCORE
390-hp, 5.6-liter V8. We the car. The continuously
got a paltry 14 mpg overall, however. variable transmission works well
Though the soft suspension absorbs PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE for loafing around, but it saps any PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
bumps well, the body jostles $44,400-$59,990 69 aspirations of sporty driving. Handling $32,560-$39,990 81
frequently. Handling is clumsy, with Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG 14 is mundane, and the ride is too stiff Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 25
slow steering and pronounced body for a sedan that costs $40,000. The
roll, but it’s ultimately secure. Inside, the spacious cabin has a premium feel, Maxima has a plush interior and a number of high-tech safety and
particularly in Platinum trim. Controls are a bit dated, and it’s a long reach to connectivity features, and uses a fairly straightforward infotainment system.
some buttons and knobs. Seven- or eight-passenger seating configurations A low roofline inhibits access and visibility. Controls are simple to use, and
are available, and the third row can power fold and unfold. Advanced safety the front seats are very comfortable and supportive. The rear cabin, however,
systems such as forward-collision warning with automatic braking and is rather cramped. An SR version with a stiffer suspension is available, but it
blind-spot warning are part of the technology package. Available in rear-wheel lacks a sunroof.
or full-time four-wheel drive, the Armada can tow a generous 8,500 pounds.

Profiles
Nissan Murano !
0 Nissan Titan
0 0
Nissan’s midsized SUV The redesigned 2017 Titan
73 uses a punchy, refined NA is more pleasant than the
3.5-liter six-cylinder XD version. It comes with
OVERALL paired with a OVERALL a smooth and punchy gas
SCORE SCORE
continuously variable 5.6-liter V8 that is mated
transmission. The cabin is quiet and to a slick and responsive seven-speed
well-finished, and has an upscale feel PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE automatic transmission. A V6 engine PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
to it. Handling is not very sporty, with $29,740-$40,780 77 will follow later. The ride is more $29,580-$55,400 NA
overly light steering that reduces driver Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 21 tolerable than the XD’s, and handling is Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
confidence. The ride is steady and less clumsy. The roomy cabin has a
absorbent on the standard 18-inch tires but less so on the Platinum trim’s variety of handy storage places, and the rear tailgate is damped—a nice
20-inchers. Optional safety features include blind-spot and cross-traffic touch. A suite of safety and driver-assistance features is offered, including
warnings, as well as forward-collision warning with automatic braking. Nissan’s surround-view camera system, blind-spot warning, and moving-
An available 8-inch color display houses the NissanConnect infotainment object detection. When properly equipped, the Titan tows 9,730 pounds.
system. Good crash-test results are a plus. Reliability has been average.
Nissan Pathfinder Nissan Titan XD
0 0
This midsized SUV has Although the Titan XD
56 seating for up to seven, 50 (Extra Duty) promises
but the second row’s heavy-duty pickup
OVERALL posture is not ideal and OVERALL capability without a stiff
SCORE SCORE
the third-row seat is tight. ride, we found that its
The 3.5-liter V6 and continuously capabilities are closer to those of a
variable transmission delivered PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE regular-duty truck. On top of that, it’s PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
respectable acceleration and 18 mpg $29,990-$43,560 72 just as clumsy in the corners as HD $31,090-$60,400 55
overall in our tests. The ride is Reliability 2 Satisfaction 1 MPG 18 trucks. It rides slightly better, however, Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG 15
comfortable enough, but handling and consumes a tad less fuel, at
lacks agility. The cabin is quiet and spacious, the controls are fairly easy to 15 mpg. The XD is available with both a new V8 Cummins diesel engine
master, and the passenger-side rear seat can be moved forward with a child and a 5.6-liter gasoline V8, which is also on the regular-duty Titan. Properly
seat installed, but the result of that setup is an overly low second-row seat equipped, the XD tows 12,000 pounds and can carry a payload of
cushion. Blind-spot warning and rear cross-traffic alert are available. 2,000 pounds. It also has a built-in goose-neck trailer hitch. A suite of safety
Reliability has been below average. The 2017 model has been freshened, and driver-assistance features is offered, including Nissan’s surround-view
gaining 24 hp and an increased towing capability of 6,000 pounds. camera system, blind-spot warning, and moving-object detection.
Nissan Rogue !
0 Nissan Versa
0 0
The easy-to-drive Rogue Nissan’s subcompact
71 is one of the better small 56 Versa sedan is
SUVs. It is relatively roomy unimpressive, with a noisy
OVERALL and quiet. Handling is OVERALL and cheap interior. The
SCORE SCORE
sound, with prompt engine drones as the car
steering response and restrained body gathers speed, and the continuously
lean in corners. Power comes from a PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE variable transmission exacerbates PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
2.5-liter four-cylinder mated to a $23,820-$32,510 74 engine noise. Handling, though secure, $11,990-$17,140 56
continuously variable transmission. Reliability 4 Satisfaction 2 MPG 24 lacks precision, and the car feels Reliability 3* Satisfaction 1 MPG 32
The CVT is not overly intrusive unless clumsy as a result. The ride is
you tromp on the gas pedal. Our AWD Rogue delivered 24 mpg overall. The compliant and has good isolation from bumps and ruts, but the short, quick
interior is spacious for the class and is nicely finished. The second-row seat is pitches make it feel jumpy on the highway. To its credit, the rear cabin is
very roomy, and the small, optional third-row seat allows seating for seven in relatively roomy and fuel economy is commendable at 32 mpg overall.
a pinch. A rear camera is standard, and available safety gear includes rear Running changes include new interior refinements and some styling details,
cross-traffic alert and forward-collision, lane-departure, and blind-spot but much of the interior still feels low rent. Most controls are straightforward.
warnings. A hybrid version with a 176-hp, 2.0-liter engine and the availability
of more advanced safety features are updates for 2017.
Nissan Sentra Nissan Versa Note
0 0
Overall, the compact This little subcompact
61 Sentra trails the class. 62 offers amazing space and
A recent freshening versatility. It’s also quieter
OVERALL resulted in a quieter car, OVERALL and more relaxed to drive
SCORE SCORE
thanks in part to the than most competitors.
less intrusive CVT. Handling is fairly Its tall stance and wide doors make it
responsive and secure, but the ride is PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE easy to maneuver, park, and hop into PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
stiff. The tall stance aids cabin access, $16,990-$24,990 62 and out of. The rear seat is really $15,480-$18,710 61
the elevated driving position helps Reliability 3 Satisfaction 1 MPG 31 roomy, and the ride feels comfortable Reliability 4 Satisfaction 1 MPG 31
visibility, and the rear seat is one of the and relaxed. Handling is more
roomiest in the class. But the driving experience is ho-hum and joyless. responsive than the Versa sedan’s. Our main gripes are its awkward driving
Acceleration times are among the slowest in the class, the cockpit is narrow, position, squishy front seats, and lack of interior storage. The continuously
and the front seats lack support. A backup camera is standard on the SV. variable transmission can magnify coarse engine noise when accelerating,
The freshening included improved occupant crash protection, which resulted but its 31 mpg overall is respectable. Standard Bluetooth, available heated
in better scores in the IIHS crash tests, as well as the availability of safety seats, and the surround-view camera system are helpful features.
features such as automatic emergency braking, blind-spot warning, and rear
cross-traffic alert. Turbo and Nismo versions are new for 2017.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Nissan Z !
0 Porsche Cayenne !
0
0 0
Employing a strong and The midsized Cayenne
75 smooth 3.7-liter V6, the 72 is one of the sportiest,
Nissan Z delivers quick most responsive SUVs
OVERALL acceleration and OVERALL available. The V6 and
SCORE SCORE
respectable fuel eight-speed automatic
economy. The six-speed manual is work well together. V8 and hybrid
a bit stiff but easy enough to use, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE engines are also available. The PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
and it can match revs on downshifts. $29,990-$49,400 81 eight-speed automatic is supersmooth. $59,600-$159,600 78
Handling is planted, with quick Reliability 3* Satisfaction 3 MPG 23 The ride is steady and composed but Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 19
steering and lots of grip, but somehow rather stiff at low speeds. The seats are
the car isn’t as engaging to drive as one would expect. The ride is very supportive and comfortable, and the cargo area is roomy enough. Interior
stiff and choppy, and road and tire noise are constant. The Z’s well-finished fit and finish is impeccable, with high-quality leather and brushed aluminum
interior is cramped, and visibility is lousy. The radio and climate controls trim, but the controls can be confusing at first. The touch screen for audio,
are very low, and their labels are small. Convertible and stiffer-riding, navigation, and phone interaction is easy to reach and straightforward to use.
higher-performance Nismo versions are available. A noise cancelation/ A plug-in hybrid is available and has a 14-mile electric range. It takes 2½ hours
enhancement system was added to quiet some of the interior racket. to charge with a 240-volt connector.
Porsche 718 Boxster !

0 Porsche Macan !
0
0 0
Porsche’s roadster offers Porsche’s latest addition
82 turbocharged 2.0- and 74 combines much of the
2.5-liter four-cylinder performance and feel of
OVERALL engines, replacing the OVERALL its sports cars with the
SCORE SCORE
previous Sixes. Most 718s functional package of a
come with a seven-speed automated small SUV. For 2017, three 3.0-liter V6
manual, which impersonates a manually PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE turbo engines are offered, ranging PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
shifted gearbox quite well. A manual $63,900-$71,600 95 from 340 to 400 hp, in addition to a $47,500-$76,000 85
is also available. Chopping off two Reliability 3* Satisfaction 5* MPG 26 new 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder. Reliability 3 Satisfaction 5 MPG 19
cylinders brought more readily available Typically equipped S models land in
power and a throaty thrum, but at the expense of Porsche’s high-revving zing. the low-$60,000 range, and the uplevel Turbo starts at $76,000. Though
Handling is superlative with impressive grip and balance, which make the car based on the previous-generation Audi Q5, the power, handling, and engine
super-responsive and fun to drive. The ride is very firm but not too punishing. note are true Porsche, as are the seats, controls, fit and finish, and attention
The cabin has a premium ambience, but the button overload takes getting to detail. The firm ride is steady and controlled but not plush. The cabin is
used to. Opening or closing the well-insulated power top takes 10 seconds, quite snug, and the center dashboard is a dizzying array of buttons that can
even on the move up to 43 mph. The front trunk is a bonus. be confusing at first. Reliability has improved to average.
Porsche 718 Cayman Porsche Panamera
0 0
For 2017, Porsche’s coupe The redesigned Panamera
NA version of the 718 Boxster NA features new turbo
is named the 718 Cayman engines and a high-tech,
OVERALL and offers 2.0- and OVERALL touch-activated control
SCORE SCORE
2.5-liter turbocharged layout that features a new
four-cylinder engines, replacing the electronic gear selector. Optional air
previous six-cylinder mills. Both PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE suspension and advanced safety PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
the base and S versions are offered $53,900-$69,500 NA features are also included. This large, $85,000-$146,900 NA
with a choice of a six-speed manual or Reliability 3* Satisfaction 5* MPG NA four-door luxury car hides beneath Reliability 3* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
a seven-speed automated manual a coupe silhouette and retains its
transmission. The switch resulted in a loss of the high-revving zing but added versatile hatchback configuration. The first-generation Panamera delivered
more readily available power. Handling remains superb, with immediate performance and agility along with enough room for four adults to ride
responses and virtually no body lean, making it fun to drive. The firm ride is comfortably. In our tests we found the Panamera enjoyable to drive, with
fairly compliant and not punishing for a sports car. The front trunk and excellent handling and cornering grip. The ride was a bit on the firm side for
hatchback provide a surprising amount of storage space. a luxury car, though.
Porsche 911 !
0 Ram 1500
0 0
The 911’s iconic shape This is the most
82 hides a thoroughly 54 comfortable-riding
modern sports car, full-sized pickup on the
OVERALL delivering performance OVERALL market, yet the Ram is
SCORE SCORE
and relative refinement. also plenty capable of
All of the engines have been updated, grunt work. Its coil-spring rear
with the base model getting a 370-hp PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE suspension helps cushion the ride, and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
six and the Carrera S a 420-hp six, $89,400-$200,400 95 the spacious cab is luxury-car quiet. $26,295-$56,295 81-82
both matched with a seven-speed Reliability 3* Satisfaction 5 MPG 23 Our Big Horn Crew Cab, with its Reliability 1 Satisfaction 3 MPG 15-20
manual. The 911 is quick, with sublime smooth 5.7-liter V8, averaged 15 mpg.
handling that makes you feel directly connected to the machine. The exhaust The base 3.6-liter V6 is no weakling, but it tows less. The torquey 3.0-liter
note is terrific, and driving the automated manual is almost as thrilling as the diesel V6 version is expensive but delivers effortless thrust and returns a
stick shift. The 911 isn’t particularly taxing on long trips, thanks to its relatively class-leading 20 mpg overall. Rear-seat room is generous, and the Uconnect
supple ride and subdued noise levels, but the low-slung cabin makes access 8.4-inch touch-screen infotainment system is easy to use. Reliability has been
a challenge. The interior is beautifully crafted, but the numerous buttons and well below average.
switches can be daunting at first.

Profiles
Ram 2500 Subaru Forester !

0
0 0
The Ram 2500 mirrors the Hitting the sweet spot
NA recent improvements that 83 among small SUVs,
the Ram 1500 benefited the Forester delivers
OVERALL from. With a coil-spring OVERALL a spacious interior,
SCORE SCORE
rear suspension, it now impressive safety
has a ride that is more civilized than equipment and crashworthiness, and
the rides of competing heavy-duty PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE outstanding visibility in a right-sized, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
trucks. Chrysler’s powerful 383-hp, $31,780-$60,870 NA affordable package. Fuel economy is $22,595-$34,295 85
5.7-liter V8 is the standard engine, but Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 14 excellent at 26 mpg overall, especially Reliability 4 Satisfaction 5 MPG 26
you can opt for the torque-rich 6.7-liter given the standard AWD. The ride is
Cummins turbodiesel inline-6. This strong-pulling diesel isn’t available on supple, and handling is very secure. Engine noise is pronounced at times.
the Ram 1500. There is also a 6.4-liter V8. The truck lends itself easily to Controls are straightforward and easy to use. The infotainment and
fifth-wheel towing, and it can be outfitted with a snow-plow preparation kit. connectivity systems have finally been updated with an intuitive touch
The Ram 2500 has two rear cameras: one for backing up, another for screen. Midtrim Foresters bring a lot of content for the money, but it’s easy to
monitoring what’s in the bed. The crew cab’s rear seat is very roomy, but crest $30,000 with options packages. A feisty turbo comes with XT trim but
access to the tall cab is awkward. Reliability has been well below average. compromises the value equation. The optional (and recommended) EyeSight
system includes forward-collision warning.
Smart ForTwo Subaru Impreza
0 0
Although the second- The redesigned 2017
41 generation Smart is NA Impreza compact has
improved, it’s still not a more available safety
OVERALL smart choice unless easy OVERALL equipment and a roomier
SCORE SCORE
parking is a priority. Tiny interior. Still available in
dimensions and a diminutive turning both sedan and five-door hatchback
circle make it a breeze to park. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE body styles, the Impreza continues to PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
Handling is fairly responsive, but the $14,650-$20,900 41 feature standard all-wheel drive. The $18,395-$24,595 NA
ride is jittery and jumpy. Noise and Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG 36 new car has a more comfortable ride, Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
vibration from the turbocharged, handling is more agile, and the cabin is
three-cylinder, 89-hp engine buzzes through the car. The six-speed considerably quieter. The 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine is mated to a
dual-clutch automatic is better than the original’s rocky-shifting transmission continuously variable transmission that mimics a conventional automatic
but still causes idle vibration. Given the car’s size and slow acceleration, you’d and is not overly intrusive; a five-speed manual gearbox is also available. The
expect better than 36 mpg overall on premium fuel. Funky interior details and infotainment screen is easy to use, and the rear seat is comfortable. Subaru’s
cheerful colors and textures abound, and the tall stance eases cabin access. EyeSight suite of advanced safety gear, including automatic emergency
An electric-drive version is also available. braking, is available.
Subaru BRZ !
0 Subaru Legacy !
0
0 0
Developed with Toyota, The Legacy is one of the
73 Subaru’s first rear-wheel- 79 roomier, quieter, and
drive sports car features a more refined midsized
OVERALL 2.0-liter four-cylinder with OVERALL sedans—attributes that
SCORE SCORE
a choice of a six-speed help it become one of our
manual or an automatic. Handling is top-scoring models in the class. Its ride
super-responsive, with cornering PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE is more comfortable than some luxury PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
precision that makes the BRZ fun to $25,395-$28,495 79 cars’, and handling is sound and $21,995-$31,640 89
drive. The car turns in promptly, with Reliability 3* Satisfaction 3 MPG 30 secure. The 2.5-liter four-cylinder is no Reliability 3 Satisfaction 4 MPG 26
almost no body lean. The steering is rocket, but it gets the job done and
quick and well-weighted. At its limits, the BRZ is slightly more forgiving than returns 26 mpg overall. A stronger, quieter 3.6-liter six-cylinder transforms
its mechanical sibling, the Toyota 86 (the old Scion FR-S). That difference the car, giving it strong performance. The unobtrusive CVT behaves much
makes the BRZ less prone to sliding its tail during spirited driving. The ride is like a conventional automatic. The infotainment system includes an
also a bit more jittery than in the FR-S. The cabin is relatively plain, with easy-to-use touch screen with internet radio and Bluetooth. A rear camera is
well-bolstered sport seats, but the ride and elevated noise can be taxing. standard. Advanced safety gear such as blind-spot monitoring and the
EyeSight safety suite, including automatic emergency braking, is optional.
Subaru Crosstrek !
0 Subaru Outback !
0
0
The Crosstrek is a small An SUV alternative, the
73
76 quasi-SUV version of the 75 Outback wagon is roomy
previous-generation and functional, and
OVERALL Impreza hatchback, with OVERALL appeals to the practical-
SCORE SCORE
a raised ride height that minded buyer. It rides
gives it enough clearance to slosh very comfortably, with secure
through deeply rutted roads. It may PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE handling. Standard AWD delivers PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
appeal to those people who live at $21,695-$25,195 74 reassuring traction in wintry $25,645-$38,195 82-85
the end of a dirt road and don’t want Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 26 conditions. The 2.5-liter four-cylinder Reliability 3 Satisfaction 5 MPG 22-24
anything big and bulky. The cabin is returns 24 mpg overall and drives
rather noisy, the ride is stiff, and the 148-hp, 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine through a standard continuously variable transmission. Opting for the
occasionally has to work hard, but fuel economy is a gratifying 26 mpg. The 3.6-liter six-cylinder makes the car quicker, quieter, and thirstier, conceding
costlier Hybrid, which got 28 mpg, has been discontinued for 2017. In the 2 mpg. The controls are all easy-to-use, including the touch-screen
end, the regular Impreza hatch may be a better choice: It’s quieter, quicker, infotainment system. The wagon’s generous rear seat is spacious enough for
cheaper, and better riding, even if its lower ride height makes cabin access a three adults. The generous cargo area is comparable to a Forester or Toyota
bit more difficult. A redesign based on the new Impreza arrives this summer. RAV4, with a lower loading height to boot. The optional EyeSight safety suite
adds automatic emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Subaru WRX/STI Toyota 86 !

0
0 0
With its blistering For 2017, the Scion FR-S is
59 acceleration and 73 renamed as the Toyota
tenacious cornering grip, 86. Jointly developed with
OVERALL the WRX is built for the OVERALL Subaru, the rear-wheel-
SCORE SCORE
enthusiast driver. A drive 86 features a
manual is standard, and a CVT is 2.0-liter four-cylinder, teamed with a
optional. Power is abundant, handling is PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE choice of a six-speed manual or an PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
nimble, and the WRX is very capable on $26,695-$39,995 75 automatic transmission. Its low curb $26,255-$26,975 78
the track. But the ride is very stiff and Reliability 2 Satisfaction 4 MPG 26 weight and optimal weight distribution Reliability 3* Satisfaction 3* MPG 30
choppy, and the clunky shifter and give it precise handling at its limits. In
abrupt clutch engagement make the WRX frustrating as a daily driver. corners, the car turns in promptly—with almost no body lean—but it can be
The higher-performance WRX STI has a different transmission and suspension, challenging at its limits. The steering is well-weighted, and the ride is slightly
and a more powerful 305-hp engine. Subaru’s EyeSight assistance package more compliant than its Subaru BRZ sibling’s. Inside, the cabin is relatively
includes lane-keep assist, pre-collision braking, and lane-departure warning. plain, with well-bolstered sport seats, but the stiff ride and elevated noise can
Blind-spot detection and rear cross-traffic alert are also available. Recent be taxing. The vestigial rear seats are best left for cargo. The standard audio
updates include new exterior styling, enhanced suspension tuning, and interior system has a 7-inch touch-screen display.
refinements. Reliability has dropped to below average.
Tesla Model S !
0 Toyota Avalon !
0
0 0
Receiving a midyear Spacious, quick, and
87 freshening, this sporty 83 quiet, the Avalon is an
four-door luxury car seats old-school big sedan
OVERALL five (or seven with the OVERALL updated for modern
SCORE SCORE
optional rear-facing jump times. Power comes from
seats) and just happens to be electric. a lively 268-hp, 3.5-liter V6, which
With its optional 90-kWh battery—the PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE delivers punchy performance and a PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
largest available—it has a claimed $71,600-$125,800 100 commendable 24 mpg overall. The $33,250-$42,550 80
range of 294 miles. The 85-kWh P85D Reliability 3 Satisfaction 5 MPG 87 four-cylinder hybrid version delivers Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 24
that we tested had a 220-mile range an outstanding 36 mpg overall.
and can be fully charged in about 5 hours on a dedicated Tesla connector. Easy-to-use controls include a straightforward touch-screen infotainment
Performance is exceptional, with thrilling acceleration, pinpoint handling, and system. Interior noise is subdued. Avalons from 2013-15 had an overly stiff
a firm yet comfortable ride. A huge iPad-like center screen controls many ride, but Toyota rectified that with improvements for 2016, without degrading
functions but can be distracting. Drawbacks include tight access, restricted the car’s handling. Now the ride fits the car’s mission as being a plush and
visibility, and range limitations, especially in cold weather. All-wheel drive and comfortable cruiser. The 2017 Avalon brings standard advanced safety
active safety features are also available. Reliability has improved to average. features such as automatic emergency braking.
Tesla Model X Toyota C-HR
0 0
The electric-powered Apparently, Toyota thinks
58 Model X is more showy NA what the world needs is
than practical. It features another Nissan Juke:
OVERALL rear doors that open up OVERALL Witness the C-HR, or
SCORE SCORE
and out of the way, giving Coupe High-Rider. Along
easy access to the rear seats. But these with its funky and polarizing styling,
massive doors take their time to open PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE the C-HR ticks all of the boxes in order PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
and close. The huge windshield $80,000-$115,500 77 to stand out in the hot and ever- $19,000-$24,000E NA
extends up and over the front-seat Reliability 1 Satisfaction 5 MPG 92 growing tiny crossover segment. It Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
occupants, making the cabin feel airy features a hatchback for easy cargo
and futuristic. Buyers can opt for five-, six-, or seven-passenger seating storage and access, and the folding rear seats give it additional practicality.
configurations, but unlike every other SUV, the second row doesn’t fold, The raised cabin height and bulky fenders lend it macho SUV-like cred.
which compromises utility. Like the S, the Model X is very quick and handles Hidden rear door handles give the impression that it’s a two-door coupe.
well. Ride comfort and noise isolation aren’t as good as in the S, however. The Getting this tidy package underway is the responsibility of a 2.0-liter
90-kWh version we tested had a realistic 230-mile range. First-year reliability four-cylinder engine mated to a continuously variable transmission. Initially,
has been well below average. just front-wheel drive will be offered. The C-HR goes on sale this spring.
Toyota 4Runner Toyota Camry !

0
0
Tough and ready to tackle Sure, it might seem
83
62 off-roading adventures, 85 vanilla, but the Camry
the truck-based 4Runner truly delivers what
OVERALL falls short of most OVERALL shoppers want in a
SCORE SCORE
modern SUVs on all other midsized sedan. The
counts. Its rough-sounding 4.0-liter V6 Camry’s no-fuss driving experience—
is powerful and reasonably fuel- PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE great outward visibility, controls that PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
efficient. But the ride is unsettled, and $34,010-$42,325 55 fall easily to hand, a roomy interior— $23,070-$31,370 84-87
handling is clumsy. The body leans Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 18 may not be the most thrilling in its Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 26-38
noticeably while cornering, and the class, but it’s far from its undeserved
bobbing and bouncing ride chips away at driver confidence. A high step-in boring reputation. A quiet cabin, slick powertrains, a comfortable ride, and
and low ceiling compromise access and driving position. The SR5’s 4WD sound handling make it pleasant and capable. Year after year this sedan
system is part-time only. A third-row seat is optional, and the power- delivers outstanding reliability and solid owner satisfaction. The Camry
retractable rear window is handy. Reliability is well above average, but it acquitted itself well in crash tests, and fuel economy is competitive. We got
scores too low in our testing to be recommended. 26 mpg overall with the V6 and 28 mpg with the four-cylinder, topping out
with the Hybrid’s 38 mpg. A redesigned model comes out later in 2017.
that vehicles with these systems are designed, deployed, and marketed safely. Please heed all warnings and keep your hands on the wheel. CR.ORG 81
Profiles
Toyota Corolla !
0 Toyota Mirai
0 0
The Corolla delivers a The $57,000 Mirai is the
77 relatively comfortable NA first hydrogen-powered
ride for a small car and fuel-cell vehicle available
OVERALL has a quiet, spacious OVERALL for retail sale. It has a
SCORE SCORE
interior. Handling is range of 300 miles on a
lackluster but very secure. A sportier single fill-up of 5 kg of hydrogen (the
S version has a tauter suspension PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE energy equivalent of 5 gallons of gas). PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
with marginally better handling. The $18,500-$22,680 71 It usually takes 15 minutes to fill the $57,500 NA
continuously variable transmission is Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 32 tank. The Mirai is sold only in areas Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
fine when loafing around but can elicit near existing or planned fueling
loud engine noise under higher revs. Fuel economy is excellent at 32 mpg stations on the coasts. Acceleration from the 153-hp electric motor feels
overall and returns 43 mpg on the highway. Inside, padded and stitched sluggish in this heavy sedan, but otherwise it feels like driving a conventional
surfaces contrast with a number of drab, hard-plastic bits. Upscale features car. It’s about the size of a Camry and seats four. The optional power takeoff
include standard Bluetooth connectivity, automatic climate control, and a can let owners run their home if the power goes out. It is on sale in California
touch-screen radio with simple controls. The rear seat is one of the roomiest and in the Northeast, and Toyota is offering free fuel for the duration of the
in the category. For 2017, Toyota has made forward-collision warning with $499 per month, three-year lease.
automatic emergency braking standard.
Toyota Corolla iM !
0 Toyota Prius !
0
0 0
The iM is essentially a In our tests the Prius
70 better-handling Corolla 77 returned 52 mpg overall,
hatchback and is a significant improvement
OVERALL highlighted by its angular OVERALL over the previous
SCORE SCORE
styling and sub-$20,000 generation’s 44 mpg. On
starting price. Sized like a Mazda3, the top of that, the new car also handles
iM gets a 137-hp, 1.8-liter four-cylinder PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE more responsively and rides more PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
engine hooked up to either a six-speed $18,750-$19,490 64 comfortably. Colorful digital gauges $24,685-$30,015 75
manual or a CVT. We got 31 mpg overall Reliability 5* Satisfaction 4* MPG 31 dominate the dashboard with Reliability 5 Satisfaction 5 MPG 52
with the CVT in our testing. The iM abundant fuel-economy information.
possesses taut handling and a decent level of standard equipment, including The touch-screen infotainment system is fairly straightforward. The sensible
automatic climate control and audio controls on the steering wheel. But Prius has always been about efficiency and low running costs. The car can
acceleration is short on zip, and neither the ride nor the rear seat is as still drive solely on electric, up to about 25 mph typically, and the engine is
comfortable as the Corolla’s. A sunroof is not available. For 2017, Toyota retired now quieter when it kicks in. However, the seats are rather chintzy, tire noise
the Scion brand, so this car is now called Corolla iM. Also new for 2017, is noticeable, and cabin access is not as easy because of the car’s lower
Toyota has made forward-collision warning with automatic braking standard. stance. A plug-in version, the Prius Prime, is new. For the 2017 model year,
forward-collision warning with automatic braking is standard.
Toyota Highlander !
0 Toyota Prius C
0
The Toyota Highlander This smaller, less
85
86 ranks among the best 63 expensive alternative to
midsized, three-row SUVs, the regular Prius feels like
OVERALL with a desirable balance OVERALL a Spartan subcompact,
SCORE SCORE
of an absorbent ride, but with a hybrid
responsive handling, and generous powertrain. In the end, you pretty
interior space. A third row allows PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE much get what you pay for, and it is PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
seating for eight in a pinch—seven with $30,630-$47,880 84-85 no substitute for the real Prius. The $19,560-$24,495 55
optional second-row captain’s chairs— Reliability 4 Satisfaction 4 MPG 20-25 C has a harsh ride, a noisy engine, Reliability 4 Satisfaction 4 MPG 43
and folds flat easily for more cargo and slow acceleration. The interior
stowage. The punchy 3.5-liter V6 is matched to an eight-speed automatic looks and feels cheap, the driving position and rear seats are cramped, and
for 2017. The Hybrid gets 25 mpg overall compared with the conventional there’s little cargo space. However, its 37 mpg makes the Prius C one of the
engine’s 20. It’s a long reach to some controls, particularly the touch screen. most frugal vehicles we’ve tested, and its 43 mpg overall is just 1 mpg less
The Entune system includes a larger 8-inch screen. A comprehensive suite of than the previous-generation Prius hatchback. Its tiny dimensions make it a
safety technology, including automatic emergency braking, is standard for natural for urban driving. Reliability is above average, but the Prius C scored
the 2017 model year. too low to be recommended. For the 2017 model year, automatic emergency
braking is standard.
Toyota Land Cruiser !

0 Toyota Prius Prime
0 0
Toyota’s flagship SUV has The Prime is a plug-in
74 the same smooth and NA Prius that can usually
powerful 5.7-liter V8 as drive about 23 miles on
OVERALL the Tundra pickup. OVERALL electricity only. It can
SCORE SCORE
Coupled with an cruise on electric-only
eight-speed automatic transmission, power at speeds up to 84 mph, but the
it’s luxurious, quick, quiet, comfortable, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE gas engine tends to start up in cold PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
and refined. We tested it with the old $84,325 68 weather and at highway speeds, even $27,100-$33,100 NA
six-speed transmission, and it proved Reliability 4* Satisfaction 5* MPG 14 in EV mode. When not running in EV Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
thirsty for fuel, at 14 mpg overall. The mode, the Prime operates much like
big Land Cruiser rides very comfortably, and the interior is roomy and the regular Prius, alternating between electric and gas power. With slightly
well-finished. Expect terrific off-road performance, helped by its crawl mode altered styling than the regular Prius, the Prime is can hold only four
to ascend and descend steep slopes. But on-road handling is rather clumsy. passengers, and it loses the rear wiper. Ride and handling are quite similar
Blind-spot monitoring, lane-departure warning, and rear cross-traffic alert are to the regular Prius, with responsive handling and a compliant ride. Standard
standard. Electronic connectivity is also updated, with Toyota’s Entune safety features include automatic emergency braking and lane-keep assist.
touch-screen audio system standard.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Toyota Prius V !
0 Toyota Tacoma
0 0
This wagon version of the The Tacoma remains as
71 previous-generation Prius 41 rough and tumble as it
offers a very roomy rear has always been. Toyota’s
OVERALL seat and a generous OVERALL compact pickup features
SCORE SCORE
cargo area. It’s about the a 3.5-liter V6 hooked up
size of the Ford C-Max, its main to either a six-speed manual or a
competitor. Despite its extra weight PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE six-speed automatic transmission. A PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
and a less aerodynamic shape, the $26,675-$30,935 73 2.7-liter four-cylinder engine, which $24,120-$40,760 46
V still got an excellent 41 mpg overall Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 41 can be mated to a five-speed manual, Reliability 1 Satisfaction 3 MPG 19
in our tests. The electric motor and is also available. Both two- and
engine have to work fairly hard, especially when the car is loaded with cargo. four-wheel-drive models are offered. Our four-wheel-drive V6 Tacoma
The ride is comfortable, but uneven pavement can cause an annoying delivered a good 19 mpg overall. Though the truck is tough as nails and
side-to-side rocking. Handling is sound and secure but hardly inspiring. Rear delivers impressive off-road prowess, it’s primitive. The ride is stiff, handling
visibility is better than in the standard Prius. A larger 4.1-inch dash-top screen is ponderous, the cabin is very loud, and the driving position is awkwardly
for trip computer functions is also new. low. The modern connectivity features are welcome. Safety features such as
blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert are available. First-year
reliability of the redesign has been well below average.
Toyota RAV4 !
0 Toyota Tundra !
0
0
For years, the RAV4 has Despite a recent
78
79 consistently been among 67 freshening that updated
the top-ranked small the exterior and interior,
OVERALL SUVs. The current RAV4’s OVERALL including improved
SCORE SCORE
cabin is quieter, the ride is controls, the Tundra feels
smoother, it has a suite of advanced outclassed by newer and more refined
safety features, and it offers a frugal PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE competitors. It offers a standard PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
hybrid version. The energetic 2.5-liter $24,910-$36,150 74-75 two-door regular cab and two sizes of $30,020-$50,030 63
four-cylinder and smooth six-speed Reliability 5 Satisfaction 3 MPG 24-31 crew cabs. You can choose between a Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 15
automatic returned 24 mpg overall in very powerful 5.7-liter V8 and a 4.6-liter
our tests of an AWD version. The hybrid version gets a terrific 31 mpg overall. V8. The six-speed automatic is very smooth and responsive. Handling is
Handling is responsive and very secure. Inside, the controls are clear and secure, but the ride with the TRD package is way too stiff. The cabin is very
intuitive. Though the XLE comes with automatic climate control and a roomy, but it’s a long reach to some controls. Towing performance is
sunroof, you must step up to the Limited trim to get adjustable lumbar extremely capable. The damped rear tailgate is easy to raise and lower.
support and the more comfortable faux-leather seats. Access is very easy,
and the rear seat is roomy. For the 2017 model year, automatic emergency
Toyota Sequoia !
0 Toyota Yaris
0 0
The big, eight-passenger Even after its recent
65 Sequoia has a strong and 57 face-lift, the Yaris remains
refined 5.7-liter V8 paired a slow, noisy, and tinny
OVERALL to a six-speed automatic. OVERALL subcompact with a
SCORE SCORE
That combination choppy ride and an
returned 15 mpg overall in our tests. awkward driving position. This two-
Rear- and selectable, full-time PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE or four-door hatchback uses a 1.5-liter PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
four-wheel drive are available. The $45,460-$65,215 60 four-cylinder engine. A five-speed $15,250-$18,000 47
ride is firm, and handling is clumsy Reliability 4* Satisfaction 4 MPG 15 manual transmission is standard; Reliability 5* Satisfaction 3* MPG 32
but secure. The independent rear a four-speed automatic is optional.
suspension allows the third-row seat to fold flat into a well. It’s a high step-in The Yaris we tested returned 32 mpg overall. All versions have Toyota’s
to get into the cabin, but once inside passengers will find the interior to be Entune infotainment system, with a 6.1-inch touch screen and phone
very roomy. Blind-spot monitoring and lane-departure warning are available. connectivity. A dealer-installed navigation system is available as an option.
Electronic connectivity includes Toyota’s Entune touch-screen audio system. If you are set on buying a subcompact, the Yaris iA is more fuel-efficient and
is likely to be a better choice. For the 2017 model year, automatic emergency
Toyota Sienna !
0 Toyota Yaris iA !
0
0
As minivans go, the For 2017, the Scion iA is
78
80 Sienna is a sensible 67 renamed the Toyota Yaris
choice, but it isn’t very iA. This four-door sedan is
OVERALL engaging to drive. The OVERALL actually built by Mazda
SCORE SCORE
Sienna rides very and is based on the new
comfortably and is quiet inside, but Mazda2 (not sold in the U.S.). It is
handling is lackluster. The 3.5-liter V6 PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE powered by a 106-hp, 1.5-liter PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
is lively and returned a respectable $29,750-$47,310 78-80 four-cylinder coupled to either a $15,950-$17,050 60
20 mpg overall in our tests with the Reliability 5 Satisfaction 4 MPG 19-20 six-speed manual or an automatic. In Reliability 5* Satisfaction 3* MPG 35
six-speed automatic, which gets our testing we got 35 mpg overall with
replaced by an eight-speed for 2017. The all-wheel-drive version—the only the automatic. The iA proves to be quite pleasant for a subcompact,
such minivan on the market—sacrifices just 1 mpg. An eighth seat cleverly with nimble handling and semi-decent interior décor. It also comes with
stores in the back when it isn’t installed in place. The 2017 update also a standard low-speed pre-collision system that helps the driver avoid
brought a standard backup camera, an additional LATCH attachment, and collisions. A backup camera is standard. Just like in current Mazda models,
a front-passenger seat-cushion airbag. Reliability has been above average. the infotainment system consists of a center control knob and a screen,
That and the availability of all-wheel drive are the Sienna’s biggest advantages which takes some getting used to in order to master. A navigation system
over the Honda Odyssey. is a dealer-installed option.

Profiles
Volkswagen Atlas Volkswagen Golf
0 0
Volkswagen is joining the The Golf is a notch above
NA three-row family SUV 64 other compacts in terms
segment with its all-new of sophistication, interior
OVERALL Atlas, which goes on sale OVERALL ambience, and driving
SCORE SCORE
this spring. It will have experience, and it is
two engines, both of which are mated priced accordingly. Performance from
to an eight-speed automatic: a 235-hp, PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE the smooth, strong 170-hp, 1.8-liter PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder $30,000-$48,000 NA turbo four-cylinder feels effortless, and $19,895-$39,375 82
and a 276-hp, 3.6-liter V6. Front-wheel Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA we got 28 mpg overall in our tests with Reliability 2 Satisfaction 3 MPG 28
drive is standard with both engines, the six-speed automatic. Handling is
but the V6 can also be paired with all-wheel drive. Advanced safety features very responsive, making the Golf fun to drive. The ride is comfortable, the
such as adaptive cruise control and forward-collision warning with automatic rear seat is relatively roomy, and the quiet cabin contributes to the Golf’s solid
braking will be available. The cabin is uncluttered, and the third-row seat is and upscale feel. The Alltrack, an AWD model with a raised ride height, is new
roomy enough for adults. Infotainment will be available with Android Auto for 2017. A high-performance all-wheel-drive Golf R and an electric eGolf
and Apple CarPlay compatibility. Pricing is expected to start at $30,000 and complete the line. Recent additions include blind-spot monitoring and rear
span to $48,000. cross-traffic alert. Reliability has been below average.
Volkswagen Beetle Volkswagen Golf Alltrack
0 0
The Beetle coupe and Volkswagen turned the
46 convertible have a 66 Golf wagon into a
roomy-enough interior small-SUV alternative with
OVERALL and decent driving OVERALL the Alltrack by endowing
SCORE SCORE
experience. Though the it with standard all-wheel
ride is acceptable, it’s a bit unsettled. drive and slightly increased ground
Handling is responsive but not sporty PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE clearance. But despite the rugged PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
and gets sloppy in demanding $19,995-$32,550 59 posturing, the Alltrack truly triumphs $21,580-$32,890 89
conditions. The 1.8-liter turbocharged Reliability 1 Satisfaction 3 MPG 27 on the road. Sharp steering and quick Reliability 1 Satisfaction 3 MPG 25
four-cylinder has better performance reflexes make it fun to drive. The
and fuel economy than the 2.5-liter five-cylinder it replaced. Wind noise is Alltrack feels substantial, thanks to a quiet cabin and a composed,
excessive, rear visibility is limited, and the long clutch-pedal travel and wide well-planted ride. Expect 25 mpg overall from the 1.8-liter, 170-hp turbo four.
center console compromise the driving position. Recent updates include Great visibility, supportive seats, and simple controls are welcome, but
an available rearview camera and blind-spot detection. Reliability has been modest dimensions limit rear-seat and cargo space. The Alltrack can get
well below average. expensive; desirable features such as automatic climate control and power
seats come only on the top SEL trim. Automatic emergency braking is
optional, but blind-spot monitoring is not available.
Volkswagen CC !
0 Volkswagen Jetta
0
Style trumps function A little bigger than most
57
70 in the CC, resulting in 59 compact sedans, the
a snug interior, Jetta is a roomy,
OVERALL compromised visibility, OVERALL comfortable, and
SCORE SCORE
and difficult cabin access. practical choice. Handling
But the CC is enjoyable to drive, with is responsive, and the ride is
agile and responsive handling and a PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE comfortable. The refined and energetic PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
taut, composed ride. The 200-hp, $34,475-$37,820 78 1.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder $17,895-$28,995 74-79
2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder is strong Reliability 3* Satisfaction 2* MPG 26 delivers responsive acceleration, and it Reliability 1 Satisfaction 2 MPG 27-32
and returns 26 mpg overall with the returned an excellent 32 mpg overall in
six-speed automated manual transmission. The more powerful 280-hp, our testing. The 1.8-liter turbo four-cylinder is smooth and flexible, and
3.6-liter V6 and AWD have been discontinued for 2017. The interior is very returns a commendable 30 mpg. Opt for the GLI and you get a strong turbo
well-finished, with comfortable seats up front and, in a pinch, rear seating for 2.0-liter, a tauter suspension that delivers nimbler handling, better brakes,
three. Some features, such as a sunroof and rearview camera, are available and a richer-looking interior. The Hybrid that got 37 mpg overall in our tests
only on higher-trim versions. Recent additions include lane-keeping assist has been discontinued for 2017. Rear-seat passengers will appreciate the
and adaptive cruise control. spacious cabin, which is roomier than most competitors’. Reliability has
dropped to well below average.
Volkswagen GTI Volkswagen Passat
0
The GTI continues to With generous interior
64
71 embody the sporty, 65 space, responsive
practical, and affordable handling, and a
OVERALL hatchback concept. OVERALL comfortable, quiet ride,
SCORE SCORE
Whether opting for the the Passat is a
manual or dual-clutch automated competitive midsized sedan. The
transmission, the 2.0-liter turbo is PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE primary powertrain is an energetic PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
punchy and emits a satisfying sound. $24,995-$34,395 82 1.8-liter turbo four-cylinder that’s $22,440-$34,270 79-82
We got an impressive 29 mpg overall Reliability 2 Satisfaction 5 MPG 29 mated to a six-speed automatic. Reliability 2 Satisfaction 2 MPG 23-28
with our manual transmission test car. High-end versions use a powerful
The GTI is fun to drive by virtue of its lively handling and immediate throttle 3.6-liter V6. The 1.8-liter turbo averaged a very good 28 mpg overall and
response. Inside is a high-quality, quiet, and refined interior with comfortable 39 on the highway. Front seats are very accommodating. Rear-seat
seats. That all adds up to a sporty car that doesn’t wear on your patience occupants will appreciate the extra-spacious cabin, and the trunk is huge.
during a long drive. The infotainment system has an easy-to-use touch Improved interior fit and finish is a plus, and for 2017 VW made active safety
screen. Lane-keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring, and cross-traffic alert are features such as automatic emergency braking standard. Reliability has
now available. Reliability has dropped below average. dropped below average.

1 2 3 4 5 !
Volkswagen Tiguan !
0 Volvo V60
0 0
This solid and nimble This wagon version of the
72 small SUV has high-end 68 S60 has fairly agile
interior fit and finish handling, but the ride is
OVERALL and spacious rear seating, OVERALL too stiff. The four-cylinder
SCORE SCORE
but the cargo area is turbo we tested in the
small. Handling is very responsive S60 provided lively acceleration and
and enjoyable, with sharp steering and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE respectable fuel economy. The interior PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
strong cornering grip that keeps $24,995-$36,475 74 is quiet, but many controls, such as $36,150-$61,600 73
the Tiguan secure and unflappable Reliability 4 Satisfaction 3 MPG 21 those for the radio and trip computer, Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3* MPG 21
at its limits. With its 19-inch tires, the are overly complicated. The front
SEL rides stiffly. The lower S and SE trim lines, with 17-inch tires, ride seats are very comfortable and supportive, but the two-way lumbar adjustment
more comfortably and quietly. Automatic climate control is available only is chintzy and the rear seat is tight. Cargo space is modest for a wagon.
on the SEL, however. The 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder is smooth Safety features include automatic braking and an optional pedestrian-detection
but yielded a not-so-stellar 21 mpg overall in our tests. A redesign will be system. The AWD Cross Country version has higher ground clearance.
available this summer. Reliability has improved to average, but the V60 scores too low to recommend.
Volkswagen Touareg Volvo V90
0 0
The substantial Touareg The V90 is the wagon
NA has the feel of a premium NA version of the new S90
SUV, with sharp handling that we found falls short
OVERALL and a luxurious interior OVERALL of the refinement
SCORE SCORE
with wide, supportive expected of a midsized
seats that deliver all-day comfort. luxury sedan, thanks to the stiff ride
The only engine is a 3.6-liter V6 PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE and gruff-sounding engine. The 316-hp PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
mated to an eight-speed automatic $49,495-$60,195 NA supercharged and turbocharged T6 $55,300-$60,000E NA
transmission. In our tests of the Reliability 1 Satisfaction 3 MPG NA pulls strongly, but acceleration falls Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG NA
now-discontinued V6 turbodiesel, below class expectations. We
it pulled effortlessly and had a generous towing capacity. The low-speed measured 23 mpg overall on the T6. The base T5 version uses a 250-hp
ride is overly firm, but it’s steady on the highway. The cabin is quiet and turbocharged four-cylinder. Handling is sound but ordinary. The all-wheel-
access is easy, but the almost-$50,000 Touareg we sampled lacked some drive Cross Country version has additional ground clearance. The roomy
common luxury features, such as a sunroof. The top-of-the-line hybrid version cabin is gorgeous, with supportive seats, but the iPad-like touch screen
has been discontinued. proves frustrating to use. Forward-collision warning with automatic braking,
including pedestrian and large animal detection, is standard, as is Drive
Assist, which gives the car limited self-steering capability.
Volvo S60 !
0 Volvo XC60 !
0
0 0
The S60 offers fairly agile Though a good choice
73 handling but a stiff ride. A 71 overall, the XC60 isn’t as
smooth and refined turbo engaging to drive or
OVERALL four-cylinder and an OVERALL as sporty as the Audi Q5
SCORE SCORE
eight-speed automatic or BMW X3. The ride is
are new, and they bring respectable stiff, but handling is responsive and
performance and fuel economy. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE secure. The turbocharged four-cylinder PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
Front- and all-wheel drive are available. $33,950-$60,000 80 engines are responsive and coupled to $40,950-$51,000 74
The interior is quiet and well-finished, Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 25 a smooth eight-speed automatic. Wind Reliability 3 Satisfaction 3 MPG 20
with very comfortable front seats. But and road noise are well-suppressed.
some controls are unintuitive, the rear seat is tight, and the trunk is small. The interior is well-constructed with high-quality materials, but many controls
Safety features include City Safety, which can automatically brake the car to are too fussy to use. The seats are nicely shaped and comfortable up front,
prevent a collision, as well as an optional pedestrian-avoidance system. The although rear legroom is a bit tight. Some controls are overly complicated.
AWD Cross Country sedan has raised ground clearance. The Inscription City Safe automatic braking is standard and crash-test performance is
model adds almost 3 inches of rear legroom. Reliability has been average. excellent, but opting for other cutting-edge safety gear gets pricey.
Volvo S90 Volvo XC90
0 0
Though plush and ornate, The XC90 is a competitive
62 the S90 falls short of the 65 three-row SUV. Base
refinement expected models use a 2.0-liter
OVERALL of a midsized luxury OVERALL four-cylinder turbo,
SCORE SCORE
sedan, due to the stiff offered with front- or
ride and gruff-sounding engine. Only all-wheel drive. Our tested T6, with
four-cylinder engines are available. PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE its 316-hp turbocharged and PRICE ROAD-TEST SCORE
The 316-hp supercharged and $46,950-$56,250 73 supercharged version, delivered $45,750-$104,900 84
turbocharged T6 pulls strongly, but Reliability 2* Satisfaction 4* MPG 23 decent punch and returned 20 mpg Reliability 1 Satisfaction 4 MPG 20
acceleration falls below class overall, but it sounds raspy. A plug-in
expectations. We measured a respectable 23 mpg overall in our tests. The hybrid with an electric range of about 14 miles is available. All versions use
base T5 version uses a 250-hp turbocharged four-cylinder. All-wheel drive is an eight-speed automatic. Handling is commendable, but the ride is
available only on the T6 for now. Handling is sound but ordinary. The roomy stiff—though the optional air suspension makes it slightly better. The interior
cabin is gorgeous, with supportive seats, but the iPad-like touch screen is quiet, plush, and modern, with supercomfortable seats. But audio, phone,
proves frustrating to use. Automatic emergency braking, including and navigation functions are controlled through an unintuitive touch-screen
pedestrian and large animal detection, is standard, as is Drive Assist, which infotainment system that’s frustrating to use. Many electronic safety
gives the car limited self-steering capability. features are available. First-year reliability has been well below average.
that vehicles with these systems are designed, deployed, and marketed safely. Please heed all warnings and keep your hands on the wheel. CR.ORG 85
New & Used

Car Reliability
HOW TO READ Model Year
Average Problem Rates
THE RELIABILITY CHARTS Years with gray shading
New-Car Prediction indicate when a model was
New-Car Prediction MODEL YEARS ’ 09 ’ 10 ’ 11 ’ 12 ’ 13 ’ 14 ’ 15 ’ 16 redesigned or introduced.
This is our assessment of Engine, Major 2 1 1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A blank column means the
how a 2017 model is likely Engine, Minor 3 2 2 1 1 1 <1 <1 model was not sold that
to hold up. It is calculated year. A column of asterisks
Engine, Cooling 1 1 1 1 1 <1 <1 <1
by tracking the average of a (*) indicates models with
model’s used-car reliability Trans., Major 1 1 1 1 1 1 <1 <1
insufficient data.
for the past three years, Trans., Minor 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 <1 Trouble Spot Scores
provided the vehicle didn’t Drive System 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 <1 Average Problem Rates These are based on the
change significantly in that Fuel System 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 <1 The numbers in this percentage of survey
Trouble Spots
time. We might make a chart represent problems respondents who reported

Electrical 2 1 1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1
calculation based on one or reported for all cars problems for each specific
Climate System 4 3 3 2 1 2 1 <1
two years’ data if the model averaged over a given trouble spot, compared with
was redesigned in 2016 or Suspension 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 <1 model year, broken down the average model of that
2015. If we lack data, we Brakes 4 4 3 3 2 1 1 <1 by trouble spot and year. (See “Average Problem
predict reliability for new Exhaust 1 1 1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 expressed as a percent- Rates,” at left.) Models that
cars by using their brand’s Paint/Trim 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 age. Trouble spots that score a 1 suffer a higher
recent history. are more serious or rate of problems than the
Noises/Leaks 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 1
Owner Reliability expensive to repair are average model; models
This shows whether a Body Hardware 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 <1 given extra weight in our with a 5 had relatively few
model had more or fewer Power Equipment 5 4 4 4 3 2 1 1 calculations. problems. For some trouble
problems overall than the In-Car Electronics 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 spots with very low problem
average vehicle of that year, Owner Reliability KEY FOR rates, we do not assign a 1 or
calculated from the total a 2 unless the model’s prob-
RELIABILITY RATINGS
number of problems These charts are based on reported on any serious lem rate exceeds 3 percent.
reported by subscribers about 500,000 vehicles problems they had If a problem rate is below
in all of the trouble spots in our 2016 Annual Reliability with their vehicles in the 1 2 3 4 5 2 percent or 1 percent, it will
listed below. Survey, where subscribers past 12 months. WORSE BETTER be assigned a 4 or a 5.
17 TROUBLE SPOTS coolers and lines, rough leaks, stalling or hesitation. power steering (pumps Body Hardware
shifting, slipping transmis- Electrical and hoses, leaks), wheel Windows, locks and latches,
Engine, Major sion, leaks, transmission Alternator, starter, hybrid/ balance, springs or torsion tailgate, hatch or trunk,
Engine rebuild or replace- computer, transmission sen- electric battery replacement, bars, bushings, electronic doors or sliding doors,
ment, cylinder head, head sor or solenoid, clutch ad- hybrid/electric battery and or air suspension. mirrors, seat controls, seat
gasket, turbo or super- justment, hydraulics (clutch related systems, regular Brakes belts, sunroof, convertible
charger, timing chain or master or slave cylinder). battery, battery cables, Premature wear, pulsation or top, glass defect.
timing belt. Drive System engine harness, coil, ignition vibration, squeaking, master Power Equipment and
Engine, Minor Driveshaft or axle, CV switch, electronic ignition, cylinder, calipers, rotors, Accessories
Oil leaks, accessory belts joint, differential, transfer distributor or rotor failure, antilock brake system (ABS), Cruise control, clock,
and pulleys, engine mounts, case, 4WD/AWD compo- spark plugs and wires failure. parking brake, brake failure. warning lights, body control
engine knock or ping. nents, driveline vibration, Climate System Exhaust module, keyless entry,
Engine, Cooling traction control, electronic Blower (fan) motor, A/C Muffler, pipes, catalytic wiper motor or washer, tire
Radiator, cooling fan, anti- stability control (ESC), compressor, condenser, converter, exhaust pressure monitor, interior
freeze leaks, water pump, electrical failure. evaporator, heater manifold, leaks. or exterior light, horn,
thermostat, overheating. Fuel System system, automatic climate Paint/Trim gauges, 12V power plug,
Transmission, Major Check engine light, sensors control, refrigerant Paint (fading, chalking, remote engine start,
Transmission rebuild (includes O2 or oxygen leakage, electrical failure. cracking, peeling), loose alarm or security system.
or replacement, torque sensor), emission control Suspension trim or moldings, rust. In-Car Electronics
converter, premature devices (includes EGR), Shocks or struts, ball joints, Noises/Leaks Audio systems, entertainment
clutch replacement. engine computer, fuel cap, tie rods, wheel bearings, Squeaks or rattles, seals systems, navigation system,
Transmission, Minor fuel gauge/sender, fuel injec- alignment, steering linkage and/or weather stripping, air backup camera/sensors,
Gear selector or linkage, tion system, fuel pump, fuel (includes rack and pinion), or water leaks, wind noise. communication system.
Go to CR.org/carreliability to watch our experts discuss reliability on our Talking Car video podcast, as well as videos on topics including
the seven cars that owners regret buying, the most reliable American cars of 2017, the least reliable new cars, and others.
WATCH

Acura - BMW 1
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5
WORSE
WORSE BETTER
Acura ILX Acura MDX Acura RDX Acura TL Acura TLX
New-Car Prediction BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 AVERAGE 3 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 DISCONTINUED 0 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 0
4 * * 0
5 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
Engine, Minor 5
0 * * 5
0 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 0
5 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
Engine, Cooling 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0
Trans., Minor 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 3
0
Drive System 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
Fuel System 5
0 * * 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
Climate System 5
0 * * 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension 4
0 * * 5
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Brakes 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Exhaust 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 4
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
Noises/Leaks 3
0 * * 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 * 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Body Hardware 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
Power Equipment 4
0 * * 4
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0
In-Car Electronics 4
0 * * 4
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 * 3
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0
Owner Reliability 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0
Acura TSX Audi A3 Audi A4 Audi A5 Audi A6
New-Car Prediction DISCONTINUED 0 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4
MODEL YEARS ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 0
4 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 * * * * * * * 0
5 0
5 1
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 0
1 0
1 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 * * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
Engine, Minor 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 3
0 0
1 0
1 0
2 0
5 0
5 0
3 0
4 0
5 * * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Engine, Cooling 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Minor 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Drive System 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Fuel System 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Brakes 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 5
0
Exhaust 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 1
0 1
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Noises/Leaks 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 * * 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Body Hardware 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Power Equipment 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 * * * * * * * 3
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 * * 4
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 * * * 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 2
0
Owner Reliability 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 * * 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0
Audi Q3 Audi Q5 Audi Q7 BMW 1 Series, 2 Series BMW 3 Series
New-Car Prediction MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 AVERAGE 3
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 17 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
1 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * * * * 0
5 0
5 * * 0
1 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 3
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Engine, Minor 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
Engine, Cooling 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Minor 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Drive System 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 4
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Fuel System 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 2
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * 2
0 5
0 * * 1
0 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
Suspension 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Brakes 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 1
0 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Exhaust 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
4 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 4
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Noises/Leaks 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 * * * * * * 1
0 5
0 * * 5
0 1
0 4
0 * 2
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Body Hardware 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Power Equipment 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * 2
0 5
0 * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0
0 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 * * * * * * 1
0 3
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0
Owner Reliability 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 * * * * * * 1
0 5
0 * * 1
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0

BMW - Chevrolet
BMW 4 Series BMW 5 Series BMW i3 BMW X1 BMW X3
New-Car Prediction AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 AVERAGE 3

MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
3 0
3 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * 0
2 0
5 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5
Engine, Minor 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 * 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Engine, Cooling 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Minor 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Drive System 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0
Fuel System 2
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 * * 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Brakes 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Exhaust 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Noises/Leaks 1
0 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 * 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * * 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0
Body Hardware 2
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Power Equipment 2
0 4
0 4
0 * 1
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 * * 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0
0 1
0 4
0 * 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 * 3
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 * * 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0
Owner Reliability 1
0 3
0 4
0 * 2
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 * 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 * * 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0
BMW X5 Buick Enclave Buick Encore Buick LaCrosse Buick Lucerne
New-Car Prediction AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 AVERAGE 3 DISCONTINUED 0

MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major * * 0
4 0
2 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 4
0 0
5
Engine, Minor * * 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
1 0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 0
1 1
0
Engine, Cooling * * 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
Trans., Major * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 2
0
Trans., Minor * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0
Drive System * * 2
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 4
0
Fuel System * * 1
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical * * 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System * * 1
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension * * 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 1
0
Brakes * * 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0
Exhaust * * 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0
Noises/Leaks * * 3
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 1
0
Body Hardware * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 5
0
Power Equipment * * 3
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0
In-Car Electronics * * 1
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 * 2
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0
Owner Reliability * * 1
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 3
0
Buick Regal Buick Verano Cadillac ATS Cadillac CTS Cadillac Escalade
New-Car Prediction MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 AVERAGE 3 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 0
1 * * 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
2 0
5 0
2 * 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * * * * * 0
5 0
5
Engine, Minor 4
0 * * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 3
0 5
0
Engine, Cooling 4
0 * * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 4
0 5
0
Trans., Major 3
0 * * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 1
0 4
0
Trans., Minor 4
0 * * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 1
0 5
0
Drive System 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 * 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 * * * * * * * 1
0 2
0
Fuel System 4
0 * * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 4
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 3
0 5
0
Climate System 3
0 * * 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 5
0
Suspension 4
0 * * 4
0 4
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 1
0 1
0 * 5
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 3
0 5
0
Brakes 1
0 * * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 * * * * * * * 4
0 5
0
Exhaust 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 4
0 * * 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 * * * * * * * 1
0 5
0
Noises/Leaks 2
0 * * 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 1
0 5
0
Body Hardware 1
0 * * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 * * * * * * * 1
0 5
0
Power Equipment 4
0 * * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 1
0 * 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * * 2
0 1
0
0 * * 1
0 1
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 * * * * * * * 2
0 1
0
Owner Reliability 2
0 * * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 2
0 1
0 * 4
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 * * * * * * * 1
0 1
0

1
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5
WORSE
WORSE BETTER
Cadillac SRX Cadillac XTS Chevrolet Avalanche Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Colorado Chevrolet Corvette
DISCONTINUED 0 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 DISCONTINUED 0 AVERAGE 3 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 AVERAGE 3
‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
* 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * * 0
3 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
3 0
5 0
5 * 1
0 3
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * * 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * * 4
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
1 0
5 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
5
* 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 2
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0
* 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 * * * * 3
0 * 5
0 3
0 4
0 * 2
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 3
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0
* 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 * 5
0 2
0 3
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
* 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 4
0 * 5
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 * 1
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 1
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 1
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 * * * * 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 2
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * * * 4
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 1
0 3
0 * 3
0 1
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 3
0 * 1
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 * * * * 1
0 * 2
0 2
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 2
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 1
0 3
0 5
0
* 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 * * * * 4
0 * 2
0 5
0 1
0 * 1
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
* 1
0 2
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 * * * * 3
0 * 1
0 5
0 4
0 * 1
0 1
0 2
0 * 4
0 3
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
* 1
0 1
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 * * * * 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 * * * * 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0
* 2
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 * * * * 3
0 * 3
0 4
0 3
0 * 1
0 2
0 3
0 * 3
0 4
0 * 4
0 1
0 3
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0
Chevrolet Cruze Chevrolet Equinox Chevrolet HHR Chevrolet Impala Chevrolet Malibu Chevrolet Silverado 1500
MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 AVERAGE 3 DISCONTINUED 0 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
4
0 3
0 4
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
1 0
1 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
0
1 0
2 0
4 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 0
3 0
3 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
3 0
5 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
3 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5
1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0
2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 1
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0
4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0
1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 * 1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0
3
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0
3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 * 2
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0
1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 3
0
Chevrolet Silverado
2500HD Chevrolet Sonic Chevrolet Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe Chevrolet Traverse Chevrolet Volt
MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 AVERAGE 3 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
1 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 4
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
0
4 0
5 0
3 0
1 0
5 0
1 0
5 0
4 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 0
5 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 0
2 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
2 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 3
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
1
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0
5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 * 1
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 * 4
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 5
0
5
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 4
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 0
4 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 3
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0
5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 * 3
0 1
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 3
0
5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 1
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 * 3
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 4
0
4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 2
0 * 2
0 * 4
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 * 1
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 3
0
4
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 * 3
0 * 4
0 2
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 * 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 1
0

Chrysler - Honda
Chrysler 200 Chrysler 300 Chrysler Town & Country Dodge Charger Dodge Durango
New-Car Prediction MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 AVERAGE 3 DISCONTINUED 0 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 * * * 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 4
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 0
5 0
5 * * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 *
Engine, Minor 4
0 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
1 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 * * * * * 4
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 *
Engine, Cooling 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 *
Trans., Major 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 3
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 2
0 2
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Trans., Minor 4
0 4
0 3
0 * 1
0 * * * 5
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 * 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * 4
0 1
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 *
Drive System 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 * * * 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 4
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 *
Fuel System 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 *
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * * 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Climate System 1
0 2
0 5
0 * 4
0 * * * 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 * * * * * 1
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 *
Suspension 4
0 1
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 2
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 *
Brakes 1
0 1
0 1
0 * 5
0 * * * 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 3
0 * * * 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 *
Exhaust 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Paint/Trim 1
0 1
0 4
0 * 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 *
Noises/Leaks 4
0 1
0 1
0 * 5
0 * * * 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 *
Body Hardware 5
0 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * * * * * 4
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 *
Power Equipment 1
0 3
0 2
0 * 4
0 * * * 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 * 2
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 * * * * * 5
0 3
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 *
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 * 1
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * 4
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 *
Owner Reliability 2
0 3
0 2
0 * 1
0 * * * 4
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 * * * * * 1
0 1
0 * * 1
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 *
Dodge Grand Caravan Dodge Journey Fiat 500 Ford C-MAX Ford Edge
New-Car Prediction AVERAGE 3 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 4
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 0
1 0
4 0
5 0
5 * 0
4 0
5 * 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Engine, Minor 0
1 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5
Engine, Cooling 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Minor 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Drive System 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Fuel System 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 * 2
0 5
0 * 3
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension 2
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 2
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 * 1
0 1
0 * 3
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
Brakes 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 * 1
0 4
0 * 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
Exhaust 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 * 1
0 1
0 * 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0
Noises/Leaks 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 * 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 3
0
Body Hardware 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * * * 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 2
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0
Power Equipment 2
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 * * * 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 * 1
0 1
0 * 5
0 * 2
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 * 3
0 4
0 * 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 3
0
Owner Reliability 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 * 1
0 1
0 * 1
0 * 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0
Ford Escape Ford Expedition Ford Explorer Ford F-150 Ford F-250
New-Car Prediction AVERAGE 3 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5
Engine, Minor 0
2 0
1 0
4 0
5 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Engine, Cooling 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
Trans., Minor 2
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
Drive System 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
Fuel System 2
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System 2
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 * * 1
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension 3
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 2
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Brakes 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 * * 3
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Exhaust 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 1
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 * * 4
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0
Noises/Leaks 3
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * 2
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 * 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0
Body Hardware 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * * 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 * 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Power Equipment 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 5
0
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 * 1
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * * 4
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Owner Reliability 3
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 * 3
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 2
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 * 1
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 4
0

1
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5
WORSE
WORSE BETTER
Ford Fiesta Ford Flex Ford Focus Ford Fusion Ford Mustang Ford Ranger
MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 DISCONTINUED 0
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
0
5 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 4
0 0
5
5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
2 0
2 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
3 5
0
5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0
1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 * 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 3
0
1
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0
5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 * 1
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 2
0
1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 2
0
3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 * 2
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 2
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 * 2
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 1
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 * 2
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0
2
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0
2
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0
2
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 * 1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 * 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 * 3
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0
Ford Taurus GMC Acadia GMC Canyon GMC Sierra 1500 GMC Sierra 2500HD GMC Terrain
AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 AVERAGE 3
‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
0
5 0
1 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 3
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
1 1
0 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
4 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
1 0
5 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 0
3 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
3 0
1 0
5 0
1 0
5 0
4 1
0 0
1 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
1
0 2
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 * 4
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
3 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 * 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0
4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 * 1
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0
1
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 * 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 * 2
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 * 5
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 2
0
3
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 * 4
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0
GMC Yukon GMC Yukon XL Honda Accord Honda Civic Honda Crosstour Honda CR-V
MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 DISCONTINUED 0 AVERAGE 3
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
1 0
2 0
5 0
5 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
0
2 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 0
4 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 * 4
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 * * 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 * 3
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 * 3
0 1
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 * * 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
1
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 * 1
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
3
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 * 3
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 * 4
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 1
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0
3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 * 4
0 2
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0

Honda - Lexus
Honda Fit Honda HR-V Honda Odyssey Honda Pilot Honda Ridgeline
New-Car Prediction AVERAGE 3 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3

MODEL YEARS ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 4
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Engine, Minor 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 5
0 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
Engine, Cooling 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Minor 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Drive System 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Fuel System 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0
Brakes 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 5
0
Exhaust 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0
Noises/Leaks 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0
Body Hardware 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 0
4 4
0 4
0 3
0
Power Equipment 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
Owner Reliability 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Hyundai Accent Hyundai Azera Hyundai Elantra Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Santa Fe
New-Car Prediction BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 DISCONTINUED 0 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major * * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
5 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Engine, Minor * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
4 * 5
0 5
0 0
4 0
1 0
1 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5
Engine, Cooling * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Minor * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 1
0 * * 4
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Drive System * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Fuel System * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical * * * 5
0 5
0 3
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System * * * 4
0 5
0 3
0 * * * * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 * 4
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Brakes * * * 1
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Exhaust * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim * * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 * 4
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0
Noises/Leaks * * * 4
0 3
0 2
0 * * * * * 5
0 4
0 2
0 * * 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Body Hardware * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Power Equipment * * * 5
0 4
0 2
0 * * * * * 2
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 * 4
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0
In-Car Electronics * * * 2
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 3
0 1
0 4
0 * * 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 * 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0
Owner Reliability * * * 4
0 4
0 4
0 * * * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 * 3
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0
Hyundai Santa Fe Sport Hyundai Sonata Hyundai Tucson Infiniti G Infiniti JX, QX60
New-Car Prediction MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 DISCONTINUED 0 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 5
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 *
Engine, Minor 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
4 0
4 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
4 0
5 4
0 4
0 5
0 *
Engine, Cooling 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 *
Trans., Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 *
Trans., Minor 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 *
Drive System 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 *
Fuel System 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 *
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 *
Climate System 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Suspension 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 *
Brakes 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 *
Exhaust 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Paint/Trim 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 *
Noises/Leaks 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 *
Body Hardware 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 *
Power Equipment 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 *
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 *
Owner Reliability 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 *
1
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5
WORSE
WORSE BETTER
Infiniti M, Q70 Infiniti Q50 Jeep Cherokee Jeep Grand Cherokee Jeep Wrangler Kia Cadenza
MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 AVERAGE 3
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
* * 0
4 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 5
0 * 0
4 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 0
5 0
5 *
* * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 0
1 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 5
0 5
0 *
* * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
* * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 *
* * 5
0 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 * 3
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 *
* * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 * 1
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
* * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 * 1
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 *
* * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
* * 4
0 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 * 1
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
* * 4
0 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
* * 4
0 1
0 4
0 * 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 * 1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
* * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 0
4 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
* * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 *
* * 5
0 1
0 1
0 * 4
0 * 5
0 3
0 * 3
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 * 2
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 2
0 *
* * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 *
* * 2
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 * 1
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
* * 1
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 * 1
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 * 1
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 *
* * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 3
0 2
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 2
0 * 1
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 2
0
Kia Forte Kia Optima Kia Sorento Kia Soul Kia Sportage Lexus CT 200h
BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 AVERAGE 3 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5
‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
0
4 * * * 0
5 0
5 * * * 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 4
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * 0
4 0
4 0
3 * * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 *
2
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 1
0 3
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 * * * 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
3
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 * * 1
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
3
0 * * * 5
0 3
0 * * * 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
4
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
3
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 5
0 3
0 * * * 4
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
2
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * 1
0 2
0 3
0 * * * 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 *
4
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
3
0 * * * 1
0 4
0 * * * 2
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 * * 3
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 4
0 1
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
1
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * * 1
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 * * 4
0 1
0 1
0 * * * 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
4
0 * * * 4
0 3
0 * * * 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 * * 3
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 * * 4
0 4
0 3
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 *
Lexus ES Lexus GS Lexus GX Lexus IS Lexus LS Lexus NX

MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * * * * 0
5 0
5 * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5
0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 1
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 4
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * 4
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * 4
0 5
0 * * 1
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 4
0 * * * * * * 5
0 4
0 * * 1
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0
5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0
5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0
5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 4
0 * * * * * * 4
0 5
0 * * 2
0 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 * 3
0 3
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0

Lexus - Scion
Lexus RX Lincoln MKC Lincoln MKS Lincoln MKX Lincoln MKZ
New-Car Prediction BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 DISCONTINUED 0 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 AVERAGE 3
MODEL YEARS ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
4 * * * 0
5 * * * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Engine, Minor 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 * * * * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5
Engine, Cooling 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * 5
0 * * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * 4
0 * * * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Minor 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 * * * 2
0 * * * * 4
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Drive System 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 * * * 4
0 * * * * 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Fuel System 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 * * * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 * * * 4
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 * * * * 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 * * * 4
0 * * * * 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0
Brakes 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 * * * 4
0 * * * * 2
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Exhaust 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * 1
0 * * * * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
Noises/Leaks 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 * * * 1
0 * * * * 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
Body Hardware 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 * * * 4
0 * * * * 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0
Power Equipment 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 * * * 2
0 * * * * 3
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 3
0
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 * * * * 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0
Owner Reliability 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 * * * 1
0 * * * * 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0
Mazda3 Mazda5 Mazda6 Mazda CX-3 Mazda CX-5
New-Car Prediction BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 DISCONTINUED 0 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 AVERAGE 3 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4
MODEL YEARS ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
Engine, Minor 0
2 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Engine, Cooling 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Minor 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 * 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Drive System 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Fuel System 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 3
0 * 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 * 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Brakes 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 * 5
0 2
0 * 3
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
Exhaust 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 * 1
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 * 3
0 * 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Noises/Leaks 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Body Hardware 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Power Equipment 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 3
0 3
0 * 3
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 * 5
0 * 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 2
0
Owner Reliability 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0
Mercedes-Benz
Mazda CX-9 Mazda MX-5 Miata Mercedes-Benz C-Class Mercedes-Benz E-Class GL-Class, GLS
New-Car Prediction AVERAGE 3 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 AVERAGE 3 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 0
4 0
5 0
5
Engine, Minor * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
3 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
1 0
4 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * * * 4
0 2
0 5
0
Engine, Cooling * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 2
0 4
0 5
0
Trans., Major * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 3
0 5
0
Trans., Minor * 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 4
0 2
0 5
0
Drive System * 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * 4
0 4
0 5
0
Fuel System * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 2
0 4
0 5
0
Climate System * 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 2
0 5
0
Suspension * 1
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 * * 5
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0
Brakes * 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 4
0 3
0 5
0
Exhaust * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim * 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0
Noises/Leaks * 2
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 2
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0
Body Hardware * 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * 4
0 3
0 5
0
Power Equipment
* 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 * * 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 * * * * * 4
0 2
0 5
0
In-Car Electronics * 4
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 * * * * * 5
0 2
0 5
0
Owner Reliability * 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 * * * * * 1
0 1
0 5
0

1
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5
WORSE
WORSE BETTER
Mercedes-Benz Mercedes-Benz
GLK-Class, GLC M-Class, GLE Mini Cooper Mini Cooper Countryman Nissan Altima Nissan Frontier
MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 AVERAGE 3 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3
‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
* 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 * 0
1 * 0
5 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
4 0
4 0
1 0
5 0
4 * 4
0 * 5
0 * * 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
* 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 4
0 * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * 4
0 * 4
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 * 5
0 * * 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
* 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 * * 1
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 4
0 * * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 * 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 4
0 * * 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0
* 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 1
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0
* 4
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 * * 2
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 * * 3
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 * 5
0 * * 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 5
0
* 4
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 * 4
0 * * 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 4
0
* 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 * 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
* 1
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 * 3
0 * 4
0 * * 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * * 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 * 3
0 * 1
0 * * 1
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 3
0
* 3
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 * 1
0 * 4
0 * * 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 3
0
Nissan Juke Nissan Leaf Nissan Maxima Nissan Murano Nissan Pathfinder Nissan Rogue
AVERAGE 3 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
* 0
1 0
3 * * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 3
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
2 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
* 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 3
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 1
0 1
0 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
* 1
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 1
0 1
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 4
0 * * * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 2
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 3
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 * 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 * * * * 2
0 2
0 4
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0
* 5
0 2
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 2
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 3
0 4
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
* 3
0 2
0 * * * 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 2
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 1
0 3
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 0
1 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 * * * * 1
0 2
0 2
0 * 2
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 4
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 * * * * 1
0 3
0 4
0 * 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0
* 4
0 3
0 * * * 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 * * * * 1
0 5
0 3
0 * 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 3
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * * * * 1
0 1
0 3
0 * 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0
* 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 * * * * 1
0 2
0 2
0 * 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 4
0
* 1
0 2
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 * * * * 1
0 1
0 2
0 * 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 4
0 5
0
Nissan Sentra Nissan Versa Note Porsche Macan Ram 1500 Ram 2500 Scion xB
AVERAGE 3 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 AVERAGE 3 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 DISCONTINUED 0
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
* 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 * 0
1 * * 0
5 * * *
* 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 4
0 2
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 * 5
0 3
0 * 4
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 5
0 2
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 * 4
0 2
0 * 5
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 * 3
0 3
0 * 4
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 1
0 3
0 * 4
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 * 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 * * 2
0 * * *
* 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 1
0 2
0 * 3
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 1
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 2
0 * * 3
0 * * *
* 3
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 * 2
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 3
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 * 3
0 * 3
0 5
0 * 2
0 * * 4
0 * * *
* 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 * 1
0 * 4
0 3
0 * 3
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
4 5
0 4
0 4
0 * 3
0 * 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 3
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 * 4
0 * 1
0 3
0 * 5
0 * * 5
0 * * *
* 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 * 3
0 5
0 * 3
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 * 5
0 * 1
0 3
0 * 4
0 * * 4
0 * * *
* 4
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 * 2
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 * 1
0 * 1
0 1
0 * 3
0 * * 5
0 * * *
Subaru - Volvo
Subaru Forester Subaru Impreza Subaru Legacy Subaru Outback Subaru WRX/STI
New-Car Prediction BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2
MODEL YEARS ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 1
0 4
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 0
5 0
5
Engine, Minor 0
2 0
3 0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
1 0
5 0
5 0
1 0
4 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
2 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
5 * * * * * * 3
0 5
0
Engine, Cooling 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 4
0 4
0
Trans., Minor 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 4
0 5
0
Drive System 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0
Fuel System 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 3
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0
Climate System 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0
Suspension 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 * * * * * * 3
0 5
0
Brakes 2
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0
Exhaust 3
0 0
3 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 0
2 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * * * * 4
0 4
0
Noises/Leaks 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * 1
0 2
0
Body Hardware 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * * * * * 5
0 5
0
Power Equipment 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 * * * * * * 3
0 4
0
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 * * * * * * 1
0 5
0
Owner Reliability 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 * * * * * * 1
0 2
0
Subaru XV Crosstrek,
Crosstrek Tesla Model S Tesla Model X Toyota 4Runner Toyota Avalon
New-Car Prediction MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 AVERAGE 3 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Engine, Minor 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
Engine, Cooling 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trans., Minor 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Drive System 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Fuel System 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Climate System 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Suspension 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
Brakes 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Exhaust 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Paint/Trim 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
Noises/Leaks 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0
Body Hardware 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Power Equipment 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 * 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 * 1
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 * 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0
Owner Reliability 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 2
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 1
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0
Toyota Camry Toyota Corolla Toyota Highlander Toyota Prius Toyota Prius C
New-Car Prediction MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4
MODEL YEARS ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
Engine, Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 *
Engine, Minor 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Engine, Cooling 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Trans., Major 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Trans., Minor 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Drive System 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 *
Fuel System 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 *
Trouble Spots
Electrical 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Climate System 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 *
Suspension 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 *
Brakes 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Exhaust 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Paint/Trim 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 *
Noises/Leaks 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Body Hardware 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 *
Power Equipment 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 *
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 *
Owner Reliability 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 *
1
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5
WORSE
WORSE BETTER
Toyota Prius V Toyota RAV4 Toyota Sienna Toyota Tacoma Toyota Tundra Toyota Venza
MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 MUCH BETTER THAN AVERAGE 5 DISCONTINUED 0
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
5
0 0
5 0
5 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
0
5 5
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 2
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 0
4 4
0 4
0
4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0
4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 5
0
3
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 0
1 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0
5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 1
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
Volkswagen Golf Volkswagen Jetta

Volkswagen Beetle Volkswagen Golf SportWagen Volkswagen GTI Volkswagen Jetta SportWagen
MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1 DISCONTINUED 0
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
* 0
5 0
5 * * 0
1 0
4 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * 0
1 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5
* 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * 2
0 2
0 * 5
0 5
0 0
3 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
4 0
5 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 * 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 2
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0
* 1
0 1
0 * * 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 * 3
0 5
0 1
0 3
0 * * * 1
0 2
0 * 4
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0
* 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 3
0 * * 1
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 * 2
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 3
0 * 5
0 5
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 5
0 4
0
* 4
0 5
0 * * 2
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0
* 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 4
0 2
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 1
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0
* 5
0 4
0 * * 1
0 2
0 3
0 3
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 1
0 0
3 3
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0
* 3
0 3
0 * * 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 4
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0
* 1
0 1
0 * * 1
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 * 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * * 2
0 4
0 * 3
0 5
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 2
0 2
0 3
0 3
0
* 3
0 1
0 * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 4
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0
* 4
0 2
0 * * 2
0 3
0 3
0 4
0 * 2
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 * * * 2
0 2
0 * 5
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 1
0 2
0 4
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 3
0
* 5
0 2
0 * * 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * 3
0 1
0 4
0 1
0 * * * 2
0 4
0 * 2
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 4
0
* 3
0 1
0 * * 1
0 3
0 3
0 2
0 * 2
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 * 3
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 2
0
Volkswagen Passat Volkswagen Tiguan Volvo S60 Volvo XC60 Volvo XC70 Volvo XC90
WORSE THAN AVERAGE 2 BETTER THAN AVERAGE 4 AVERAGE 3 AVERAGE 3 DISCONTINUED 0 MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE 1
‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16 ‘ 09 ‘ 10 ‘ 11 ‘ 12 ‘ 13 ‘ 14 ‘ 15 ‘ 16
* 0
1 0
3 0
5 0
5 0
5 * * * 0
2 0
1 0
1 0
4 0
5 0
5 * * 0
4 0
5 0
5 0
5 5
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 0
5 * * * 0
5 0
5 * 0
5 * * * * * * * 0
5
* 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 0
5 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 2
0 3
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 1
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 3
0 * 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 1
0 * 4
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
0 * * * 1
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 2
0 5
0 * 4
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 4
0 5
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 * 4
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 3
0 * 5
0 * * * * * * * 3
0
* 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 1
0 * 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 3
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 * * * 2
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 2
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 3
0 * 5
0 4
0 * * * 4
0 3
0 * 5
0 * * * * * * * 4
0
* 5
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 2
0 5
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * * * 5
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 4
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 * 3
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 3
0 2
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 * * * 4
0 2
0 4
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * 2
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 1
0 5
0 1
0 2
0 * 3
0 5
0 * * * 1
0 5
0 * 5
0 * * * * * * * 2
0
* 2
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 * * 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 5
0 2
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 * 5
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 5
0 * 4
0 * * * * * * * 5
0
* 5
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 3
0 * * * 1
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 4
0 5
0 * * 3
0 4
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 * 2
0 5
0 * * * 4
0 4
0 * 4
0 * * * * * * * 4
0
* 3
0 4
0 3
0 1
0 3
0 * * * 4
0 4
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 * * 3
0 4
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 1
0 4
0 4
0 3
0 * 1
0 5
0 * * * 3
0 5
0 * 1
0 * * * * * * * 1
0
* 2
0 2
0 2
0 1
0 2
0 * * * 1
0 2
0 1
0 3
0 5
0 5
0 * * 4
0 5
0 4
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 5
0 3
0 4
0 * 3
0 3
0 * * * 3
0 2
0 * 3
0 * * * * * * * 1
0

Consumer Reports Customer Care You can call us about your subscription
at 800-333-0663.
Or write to us: Consumer Reports Customer Care
is a nonprofit P.O. Box 2109, Harlan, IA 51593-0298

Please include or copy address label from issue.
(Allow four to six weeks for processing.)
Visit us online: CR.org/magazine
organization Use our website to: Renew or pay for your current subscription
Give a gift subscription • Change your address
Report a delivery problem • Cancel your subscription
Price In U.S., $6.99 per issue, special issues $7.99.
We buy every product we test. In Canada, $7.99 CAN per issue, special issues $8.99 CAN
(Goods and Services Tax included, GST #127047702).
All other countries add $10 per year to the U.S. price
for shipping and handling.
We don’t take advertising. Back Issues Single copies of previous 24 issues, $7.95 each;
previous two Buying Guides, $14.49 each (includes shipping
and handling). Please send payment to Consumer Reports,
Attn.: Customer Care, 101 Truman Ave., Yonkers, NY 10703.
Subscriptions alone don’t cover all our Other ways to get Consumer Reports on the go: Google Play,
iPad, Kindle, Nook, Readly, Texture, and Zinio.
Permissions Reproduction of Consumer Reports in whole
costs. In other words, we rely on you. or in part is forbidden without prior written permission
(and is never permitted for advertising purposes). For ques-
tions about noncommercial, educational/academic uses
of our content, please submit requests at CRreprints.com.
Mailing Lists We exchange or rent our print customer postal
mailing list so that it can be provided to other publications,
companies, and nonprofit organizations that offer products
or services through direct mail. If you wish to have your name
deleted from our list, please send your address label with a
request for deletion from outside use to Consumer Reports,
P.O. Box 2109, Harlan, IA 51593-0298. We do not exchange
or rent customers’ email addresses. You can review our
complete privacy policy regarding Consumer Reports infor-
mation products, services, and programs at CR.org/privacy.
If you participate in our advocacy activities, please
see our Consumers Union Advocacy Privacy Policy
at ConsumersUnion.org/about/privacy.htm.
Consumer Reports (ISSN 0010-7174) is published monthly,
except twice in December, by Consumer Reports, Inc.,
101 Truman Ave., Yonkers, NY 10703. Periodicals
postage paid at Yonkers, N.Y., and at other mailing offices;
Canadian postage, at Mississauga, Ontario (Canadian
publications registration number 2665247, agreement
number 40015148). Title Consumer Reports is a federally
registered trademark in the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office. Contents of this issue copyright © 2017 by Consumer
Reports, Inc. All rights reserved under international and
Pan-American copyright conventions.
CR’s No Commercial Use Policy To view the policy, go to
CR.org/nocommercialuse.
Voting Paid subscribers may become voting members of CR
by providing written acceptance of membership, by sending
in a nomination for the board of directors, or by returning a
ballot for the annual election of CR’s directors.
Contributions are tax-deductible in accordance with the law
as Consumer Reports is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.
People who contribute $30 to $99 become Contributing
Members. Contributors of $100 to $999 become Leadership
Circle Members, and those who contribute $1,000 or more
become President’s Circle Members. Donations of com-
monly traded securities or real estate will be accepted and
immediately converted to cash. For more information or to
make a donation, please write to us at Consumer Reports,
Attn.: Donor Services, 101 Truman Ave., Yonkers, NY 10703,
go to CR.org/whygive, or send email to donorservices@
cu.consumer.org.
Planned Giving Bequests (please remember CR in your will)
and Charitable Gift Annuities can help support CR’s
programs. For information, write to Planned Giving,
101 Truman Ave., Yonkers, NY 10703.
Consumer Reports’ Staff operates under contract between
No matter how much you donate, Consumer Reports and The NewsGuild of New York Local
31003, CWA.
POSTMASTER Send address changes to Consumer Reports,
your support makes a difference. P.O. Box 2109, Harlan, IA 51593-0298. If the post office
alerts us that your magazines are undeliverable, we have no
further obligation to fulfill your magazines unless we have
a corrected address within two years.
CANADA POST If copies are undeliverable, return to
Consumer Reports, P.O. Box 1051, STN MAIN, Fort Erie ON
Please give today at L2A 6C7.
cr.org/givenow Consumer Reports is a member of Consumers

International, a federation of more than
220 consumer organizations from more than
115 countries working to protect and empower
consumers throughout the world. For informa-
tion, go to consumersinternational.org.
Please Remember CR in Your Will For information on how

to leave a bequest and become a Legacy Leader, please
contact us at 877-275-3425 or bequests@cr.consumer.org.
CRM 0317D

Selling It
Spinning Our Wheels

Car contradictions, conundrums, and confusion!
The Devil’s
in the Detailing
Coupon, no coupon;
morning, all day—this
deal’s a moving target.
Submitted by
Richard Shore of
Greenwood, S.C.
The Great Indoors

If you’ve got rain, sap,
and bird droppings
inside your garage, you
have bigger problems
than covering your car.
Submitted by
John Spiciarich and
Lisa Galjanic of
Big Pine Key, Fla.
Tiresome Exclusion Mud Bath

Our dreams of If this place only takes
budget tires were cars that are already
deflated after clean, what does it do?
reading the fine print. Give them mani-pedis?
Submitted by Submitted by Harvey
Name withheld, Vt. Ulano of Jensen Beach, Fla.
Be on the lookout for goofs and glitches like these. Share them with us—by email at SellingIt@cro.consumer.org;
by mail to Selling It, Consumer Reports, 101 Truman Ave., Yonkers, NY 10703; or by social media using the hashtag
#CRSellingIt—and we might publish yours. Please include key information, such as the publication’s name and date.
SHARE

Car shopping?
Get a deal. Without the ordeal.
Finding the perfect set of wheels

is easier than you think
• Choose new or used: Check reviews, ratings, and reliability data
• Save: With competitive, haggle-free, up-front pricing
• Know: All about financing, safety features, insurance, tires, and
car seats
LET’S GO
cr.org/buyacar
0417LCPLT

Consumer Reports - April 2017

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Consumer Reports - April 2017

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mazda MX-5

REVIEWS SELF-DRIVING TECH PICKS

SEARCH ALL PRODUCTS A - Z

Get instant access to 7,000+ product reviews

• Get unlimited access to reviews, ratings, and product and service

• Check out ratings on the go with mobile access

Go to cr.org/digital now to subscribe

R ATI N G S A N D M O R E 40 New Car Ratings 10 Driving Into the Future

APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 3

Burning Rubber insights from

Cars with an “eco” label

Why Our Car Testing Is Unique Don’t rely on blind-

spends a day to a week getting child-seat program at our Auto

4 CR.ORG APRIL 2017

President and CEO Marta L. Tellado

Debra Kalensky, Martin Lachter, Olufemi Olu-Lafe, Adam Troy

APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 5

protection from future spikes

Fairness for Fraud Victims

6 CR.ORG APRIL 2017 ILLUSTRATION BY JOHN RITTER

Notable news and smart solutions 45

Jeep Wagoneer Jeep Cherokee

8 CR.ORG APRIL 2017 ILLUSTRATION BY T.M. DETWILER

Parking-Friendly Size Elevated Driving Position

Increased Ground Clearance Easy Cabin Access

Toyota RAV4 SUVs Lead Sales

1991 1996 1999 2016

APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 9

Driving Into the Future

10 CR.ORG APRIL 2017

APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 11

12 CR.ORG APRIL 2017

APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 13

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and SAE International.

WHEN IT COMES to autonomous year. “But we expect machines to

APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 15

unexpected: Program in every possible

16 CR.ORG APRIL 2017

APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 17

buying guide, and videos on all that

18 CR.ORG APRIL 2017

Overall Three-Season Winter

100 Miles (Cents)

5 Nexen Aria AH7 $119 64 4

PERFORMANCE ALL-SEASON TIRES (H-RATED: 130 MPH)

4 Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max $98 68 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 60,000 16

5 General Altimax RT43 $92 68 4

PERFORMANCE ALL-SEASON TIRES (V-RATED: 149 MPH)

4 General Altimax RT43 $94 68 4

5 Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season $116 64 4

5 Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season $144 72 4

Online subscribers can go to CR.org for complete up-to-date ratings.

APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 19

Proceed With Caution

20 CR.ORG APRIL 2017

Acura TLX Cadillac XT5 Lincoln Continental

Chrysler Pacifica Chrysler 300 Jaguar XF

Nissan Leaf Mercedes-Benz GLC Toyota Prius

APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 21

WHAT IT TAKES TO BE TOPS

The Mazda MX-5 Miata is the

Safety All cars recommended by

The Impala continues to reign

APRIL 2017 CR.ORG 25