Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indirect Ophthalmoscope
Indirect Ophthalmoscope
R
ecent decades have seen Figure 1 The binocular indirect
UK optometrists shift ophthalmoscope
away from monocular
instruments towards
binocular indirect
techniques both for
routine fundus examination and,
in particular, where an enhanced scattered light are minimised.This
view is required. Formerly the feature results in an improved
staple instrument of the community fundus view in the presence
optometrist, direct ophthalmoscopy of media opacities than
(DO), has given ground to slit-lamp is possible with slit-lamp
binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy indirect ophthalmoscopy,
(SBIO) as the technique of choice. and in particular in comparison
Despite the fact that optometrists have with direct ophthalmoscopy. Many
embraced the advantages of binocular instruments allow the separation
techniques, head-mounted binocular between the pathways to be reduced
indirect ophthalmoscopy (HBIO) to facilitate a binocular view through
remains an instrument more associated small pupils (Figure 3).
with ophthalmology than optometry.
This article aims to review the design The condensing lens
and use of HBIO while the second Condensing lenses tend to be biconvex
article will be highlighting indications aspheric lenses featuring the majority
for its use in optometric practice. of their power on the front surface (ie
the illumination system towards the the side facing the examiner). A wide
Background patient’s pupil (hence the lens is often variety of lenses are available (Figure
The invention of the HBIO is generally referred to as a condensing lens) 4) covering a power range of around
attributed to Charles Schepens who ● Light reflected from the retina passes 15 to 40 dioptres. The choice of lens
first described it in 1945 (Schepens back through the lens creating a real, determines magnification and field
1947). Although binocular indirect horizontally and laterally inverted of view with higher powered lenses
ophthalmoscopeshadbeeninexistence image of the fundus situated between offering less magnification but a larger
since the 19th century, Dr Schepens the lens and the examiner. field of view. The 20D lens is the
developedthehead-mountedinternally The observation element of the standard lens for general examination
illuminated instrument with which instrument is a binocular viewing offering X3 magnification and a field
we are familiar today in an attempt to system incorporating a pair of low of view of approximately 45°. As well
improve the examination of patients powered convex lenses. This design as offering a greater field of view and
with retinal detachment (Figure 1). affords the examiner a stereoscopic less magnification, higher powered
view of the virtual image. The lenses have a smaller diameter and are
Design instrument uses a ‘reflex-free’ system held closer to the patient’s eye (both
The novel element of Schepens’ designed by Gullstrand towards the features which can be advantageous to
design was the use of a head mounted end of the 19th century to minimise examiners with small hands). A +30D
observation system combined with unwanted back-scatter and reflections lens will offer X2 magnification along
an internal light source. The observer during ophthalmoscopy. The principle with a field of approximately 65°. These
orientates his/her head such that is that the path taken by the light from higher powered lenses are commonly
light from the internal light source is the illumination system entering the used to examine small children and
directedintothepatient’seye.Apositive eye is separate to the path taken by light those with small pupils. They can be
powered lens is held by the examiner at emerging from the eye to be imaged by thought of as more forgiving than the
its focal length from the patient’s eye the observation system. By keeping the lower powered lenses, and as such are
serving two purposes (Figure 2): two pathways separate in the pupillary oftenadvocatedasagoodchoiceoflens
● The lens ‘condenses’ light from plane (Figure 3), reflections and back for those new to HBIO.
Disadvantages
● Generally requires mydriasis.
Although many instruments have
a ‘small pupil’ setting, an undilated
pupil makes for a more difficult
examination and as such it is generally
recommended that those new to HBIO
become proficient in the technique on
Advantages and disadvantages ● Can be used in conjunction with dilated pupils first
of HBIO scleral indentation to perform a ● The vertically and horizontally
dynamic examination of the extreme inverted image complicates the
Advantages retinal periphery. recording of fundus abnormalities
● Wide field view of the fundus which Collectively, points 1 to 5 above ● The level of magnification is
is almost completely independent of dictate that HBIO is well suited to the relatively low (especially with the
the degree of ametropia. The field rapid examination of uncooperative or higherpoweredcondensinglenses),and
of view with HBIO using a 20D apprehensive patients such as children, as such a detailed evaluation of fundus
condensing lens is typically around 8 and those with learning difficulties. BIO abnormalities may be less satisfactory
disc diameters compared with less than is also well suited to the examination than with SBIO which affords a greater
2 disc diameters with DO (less still in of those unable to be examined at the degree of magnification
the presence of significant myopia)
● High quality stereoscopic image
● Portable
● Allows the examiner to remain at
arm’s length from the patient (which
is less intimidating for apprehensive
patients than the close proximity
required for DO)
● Does not require the same degree of
cooperation on the part of the patient
as do both SBIO and DO. Children
tend to be attracted to the light source
which for HBIO provides a view of
the entire posterior pole, whereas with
DO, the tendency for a young patient to
fixate the light often results in a good
view of the fovea and little else!
● Better fundus view through media
opacities than with SBIO and especially
compared with DO
● Either magnification or field of view
can be prioritised by varying the choice
of condensing lens Figure 3 Gullstrand reflex-free system
The technique