STATISTICS

PROYECT
SEBASTIAN ABONCE

christian American School 12th grade MR. Daniel Reyna

 sedan
p=50/100=0.5
n=100 2.5% 2.5%
95%

0.025 0.975
(0.5-0.098< >0.5+0.098)
z1=-1.96 z1=-1.96
(0.402< >0.598)
E=1.96* 0.5(1-0.5)
=0.098
100
We are 95% confident that the proportion
of Sedan cars are between 0.402 and
0.596.
 Mazda
p=13/100=0.13
n=100 2.5% 2.5%
95%

0.025 0.975
(0.13-0.065< < >0.13+0.065)
z1=-1.96 z1=-1.96
(0.065< >0.195)
E=1.96* 0.13(1-0.13)
=0.065
100
We are 95% confident that the proportion
of Mazda cars are between 0.065 and
0.195.
 Rojo
p=34/100=0.34
n=100 2.5% 2.5%
95%

0.025 0.975
(0.34-0.092 < >0.34+0.092)
z1=-1.96 z1=-1.96
(0.248< >0.432)
E=1.96* 0.34(1-0.34)
=0.092
100
We are 95% confident that the proportion
of red cars are between 0.248 and 0.432.
 How did you obtain your
sample?

Questions Simple Random Sampling

ensured every participant and
car had an equal chance of
being chosen, providing a fair
representation of the total
vehicles. Was the sample truly
How did you obtain your
random?
saamples? I went with a
Yes, all of our información is
friend to parking of my house
true, the result of our
and we count the cars.
samples are random.

What potential biases may show up in your sample? Demographic, timing,

and observer biases can affect data collection in vehicle surveys, leading
to overrepresentation or underrepresentation of certain vehicle categories.
Timing biases can occur if surveys are conducted during specific hours,
affecting the variety of vehicles sampled. Observer biases, influenced by
individual preferences or unconscious biases, can also impact data collection.