RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING PROJECT WORK

NAME OF THE COURSE: 22EC406 – MINI PROJECT WORK COORDINATOR:

CLASS: II ECE C REVIEW : I SEMESTER: IV
NAME OF THE STUDENT:
Criteria Very Good Good Fair Poor
(30-25 Marks) (24-19 Marks) (18-11 Marks) (10-0 Marks) Marks
Domain Materials are enough for
Knowledge (30) Neat and clear introduction Clear introduction about the Materials are not clear and
clear understanding but not
about the domain domain not presented well
presented well

(20-15 Marks) (14-10 Marks) (9-5 Marks) (4-0 Marks)

Literature Survey Survey is performed Survey is related to the
(20) Survey is performed
perfectly and motivation of problem. But the existing Survey is not related to the
perfectly. But the
the project is neatly methods are not clearly problem.
motivation is not clear.
explained. defined

(30-25 Marks) (24-19 Marks) (18-11 Marks) (10-0 Marks)

Organization of
Slides and The presentation is good and
Content Delivery The presentation is good
clear in logical and The sequence of presentation Hard to follow and sequence
(30) and it can slightly make
technical. The flow of can be improved of information
clear
sequence also in order
(20-15 Marks) (14-10 Marks) (9-5 Marks) (4-0 Marks)
Communication
Skill (20) Excellent Fluency and used Excellent Fluency, but not
Less Fluency With Grammatical mistakes
Appropriate words used Appropriate words
TOTAL MARKS :……………../100
TOTAL MARKS :……………../ 10

1.

2.

Signature of the Guide Signature of the Evaluators Signature of the Project Coordinator
 RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING PROJECT WORK
NAME OF THE COURSE: 22EC406 – MINI PROJECT WORK COORDINATOR:
CLASS: II ECE C REVIEW : II SEMESTER: IV
NAME OF THE STUDENT:
Criteria Very Good Good Fair Poor
(10-8 Marks) (7-5 Marks) (4-3 Marks) (2-1 Marks) Marks
Future scope of the project is Relevance of the topic. Topic Obsolete
Topic Chosen good. Innovative topic Usefulness to the society Topic is relevant
(10) chosen
(10-8 Marks) (7-5 Marks) (4-3 Marks) (2-1 Marks)
Abstract (10)
Abstract provides concise Clear listing of objectives Satisfactory listing and explanations Vague listing of contents
summary that highlights with relevant explanation
most salient points
(20-15 Marks) (14-10 Marks) (9-5 Marks) (4-0 Marks)
Literature Survey Survey is performed Survey is related to the problem. But
Survey is performed Survey is not related to the
(20) perfectly. But the the existing methods are not clearly
perfectly problem.
motivation is not clear. defined
(20-15 Marks) (14-10 Marks) (9-5 Marks) (4-0 Marks)
Problem
Definition (20) Defined the problem clearly Problem definition is good. Problem definition is OK Problem definition is unclear
But can be improved.
(20-15 Marks) (14-10 Marks) (9-5 Marks) (4-0 Marks)
Organization of
The presentation is good and
Slides and The presentation is good
clear in logical and technical. The sequence of presentation can be Hard to follow and sequence of
Content Delivery and it can slightly make
The flow of sequence also in improved information
(20) clear
order
(10-8 Marks) (7-5 Marks) (4-3 Marks) (2-1 Marks)
References (10) Quality of references can be Both quality and quantity can be
Adequate and precise Precise. But not adequate.
improved improved
(10-8 Marks) (7-5 Marks) (4-3 Marks) (2-1 Marks)
Communication
Skill (10) Excellent Fluency and used Excellent Fluency, but not
Less Fluency With Grammatical mistakes
Appropriate words used Appropriate words
TOTAL MARKS : ……../100
TOTAL MARKS : ……/10

1.

2.

Signature of the Guide Signature of the Evaluators Signature of the Project Coordinator
 RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING PROJECT WORK
NAME OF THE COURSE: 22EC406 – MINI PROJECT WORK COORDINATOR:
CLASS: II ECE C REVIEW : III SEMESTER: IV
NAME OF THE STUDENT:
Criteria Very Good Good Fair Poor
(20-15 Marks) (14-10 Marks) (9-5 Marks) (4-0 Marks) Marks
Problem Defined the problem clearly Problem definition is good. Problem definition is OK Problem definition is unclear
Definition (20)
But can be improved.

(20-15 Marks) (14-10 Marks) (9-5 Marks) (4-0 Marks)

Proposed
Block diagram of the Block diagram of the Some of the All the processes(blocks) are
Architecture (20)
proposed system is concise proposed system is clear, processes(blocks) are unclear unclear
and clear but not concise.

(20-15 Marks) (14-10 Marks) (9-5 Marks) (4-0 Marks)

Team Work (20)
The team worked well
together to achieve
objectives. Each member
contributed in a major way
Worked well together most Mutual respect and Lack of coordination and
of the time involvement among team involvement
members

(20-15 Marks) (14-10 Marks) (9-5 Marks) (4-0 Marks)

Organization of The presentation is good and The presentation is good The sequence of presentation Hard to follow and sequence
Presentation (20) clear in logical and technical. and it can slightly make can be improved of information
The flow of sequence also in clear
order
(20-15 Marks) (14-10 Marks) (9-5 Marks) (4-0 Marks)
Communication
Skill (20) Excellent Fluency and used Excellent Fluency, but not Less Fluency With Grammatical mistakes
Appropriate words used Appropriate words
TOTAL MARKS :……………../100
TOTAL MARKS :……………../10

1.

2.

Signature of the Guide Signature of the Evaluators Signature of the Project Coordinator