Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accounting For Management - 3
Accounting For Management - 3
Elements of Cost:
The following chart shows the various elements of cost and how they are classified.
Opening Stock of Raw material ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Add: Purchases ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Less: Closing Stock ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Cost of material Consumed → ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Add: Direct Labor/Wages ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Prime Cost → ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Add: Works overheads ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Works Cost → ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Add: Administration overheads ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Cost of Production → ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Add: Selling and distribution overheads ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Total Cost or Cost of Sale → ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Difference Between Marginal Costing and Absorption Costing:
Definition of Marginal Costing:
Marginal Costing, also known as Variable Costing, is a costing method whereby decisions can be
taken regarding the ascertainment of total cost or the determination of fixed and variable cost to
find out the best process and product for production, etc.
It identifies the Marginal Cost of production and shows its impact on profit for the change in the
output units. Marginal cost refers to the movement in the total cost, due to the production of an
additional unit of output.
In marginal costing, all the variable costs are regarded as product related costs while fixed costs
are assumed as period costs. Therefore, fixed cost of production is posted to the Profit & Loss
Account. Moreover, fixed cost is also not given relevance while determining the selling price of
the product or at the time of valuation of closing stock (whether it is finished goods or Work in
Progress).
Absorption Costing is a method for inventory valuation whereby all the manufacturing expenses
are allocated to the cost centres to recognise the total cost of production. These manufacturing
expenses include all fixed as well as variable costs. It is the traditional method for cost
ascertainment, also known by the name Full Absorption Costing.
In an absorption costing system, both the fixed and variable costs are regarded as product related
cost. In this method, the objective of the assignment of the total cost to cost centre is to recover it
from the selling price of the product.
The following are the major differences between marginal costing and absorption costing.
1. The costing method in which variable cost is apportioned exclusively, to the products is
known as Marginal Costing. Absorption Costing is a costing system in which all the costs
are absorbed and apportioned to products.
2. In Marginal Costing, Product related costs will include only variable cost while in the
case of Absorption costing, fixed cost is also included in product related cost apart from
variable cost.
3. Marginal Costing divides overheads into two broad categories, i.e. Fixed Overheads and
Variable Overheads. Look at the other term Absorption costing, which classifies
overheads in the following three categories Production, Administration and Selling &
Distribution.
4. In marginal costing profit can be ascertained through the help of Profit Volume Ratio
[(Contribution / Sales) * 100]. On the other hand, Net Profit shows the profit in case of
Absorption Costing.
5. In Marginal Costing variances in the opening and closing stock will not influence the per
unit cost. Unlike Absorption Costing, where the variances between the stock at the
beginning and the end will show its effect by increasing/decreasing per unit cost.
6. In marginal costing, the cost data is presented to outline total cost of each product. On the
contrary, in absorption costing, the cost data is presented in traditional way, net profit of
each product is ascertained after deducting fixed cost along with their variable cost.
BASIS FOR
MARGINAL COSTING ABSORPTION COSTING
COMPARISON
Cost Recognition The variable cost is considered as Both fixed and variable cost is
product cost while fixed cost is considered as product cost.
considered as period costs.
Cost per unit Variances in the opening and closing Variances in the opening and
stock does not influence the cost per unit closing stock affects the cost per
of output. unit.
Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis:
Cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis is used to determine how changes in costs and volume
affect a company's operating income and net income. In performing this analysis, there are
several assumptions made, including:
Sales price per unit is constant.
Variable costs per unit are constant.
Total fixed costs are constant.
Everything produced is sold.
Costs are only affected because activity changes.
If a company sells more than one product, they are sold in the same mix.
CVP analysis requires that all the company's costs, including manufacturing, selling, and
administrative costs, be identified as variable or fixed.
1. Cost, which means the expenses involved in producing or selling a product or service.
2. Volume, which means the number of units produced in the case of a physical product, or the
amount of service sold.
3. Profit, which means the difference between the selling price of a product or service minus the
cost to produce or provide it.
2. In CVP analysis, it is assumed that total sales and total costs are linear and can be represented
by straight lines. In some cases, this assumption may not be found true. For instance, if a
business firm sells more units, the variable costs per unit may decrease due to more operating
efficiencies in the factory.
3. CVP analysis is performed within a relevant range of operating activity and it is assumed that
productivity and efficiency of operations will remain constant. This assumption may not be
valid.
4. CVP analysis assumes that costs can be accurately divided into fixed and variable categories.
Such categorization is sometimes difficult in practice.
5. CVP analysis assumes no change in the inventory quantities, during the period. That is,
opening inventory units equal the closing inventory units. This also means that units produced
during the period are equal to units sold. When changes take place in inventory level, CVP
analysis becomes more complex.
6. If prices, unit costs, sales-mix, operating efficiency, or other relevant factors change, then the
overall CVP analysis and relationships also must be modified. Because of these assumptions,
cost data are of limited significance.
7. Furthermore, a number of problems arise while making a multi-product analysis under CVP
analysis. The first problem is identifying the facilities which are shared by unrelated products. If
fixed expenses and facility usages can be identified directly with individual products, the
analysis will be satisfactory. A second problem occurs if there is a non-linear relationship in the
units of measurement. Different products typically yield different contribution margins and are
produced in various volumes with differing costs.
Key calculations when using CVP analysis are the contribution margin and the contribution
margin ratio. The contribution margin represents the amount of income or profit the company
made before deducting its fixed costs. Said another way, it is the amount of sales dollars
available to cover (or contribute to) fixed costs. When calculated as a ratio, it is the percent of
sales dollars available to cover fixed costs. Once fixed costs are covered, the next dollar of sales
results in the company having income.
The contribution margin is sales revenue minus all variable costs. It may be calculated using
dollars or on a per unit basis. If The Three M's, Inc., has sales of $750,000 and total variable
costs of $450,000, its contribution margin is $300,000. Assuming the company sold 250,000
units during the year, the per unit sales price is $3 and the total variable cost per unit is $1.80.
The contribution margin per unit is $1.20. The contribution margin ratio is 40%. It can be
calculated using either the contribution margin in dollars or the contribution margin per unit. To
calculate the contribution margin ratio, the contribution margin is divided by the sales or
revenues amount.
P/V Ratio:
(i) It helps in the determination of Break-even-point [BEP = Fixed cost ÷ P/V ratio]
The break‐even point represents the level of sales where net income equals zero. In other words,
the point where sales revenue equals total variable costs plus total fixed costs, and contribution
margin equals fixed costs. Using the previous information and given that the company has fixed
costs of $300,000, the break‐even income statement shows zero net income.
This income statement format is known as the contribution margin income statement and is
used for internal reporting only.
The $1.80 per unit or $450,000 of variable costs represent all variable costs including costs
classified as manufacturing costs, selling expenses, and administrative expenses. Similarly, the
fixed costs represent total manufacturing, selling, and administrative fixed costs.
Break‐even point in dollars. The break‐even point in sales dollars of $750,000 is calculated by
dividing total fixed costs of $300,000 by the contribution margin ratio of 40%.
Another way to calculate break‐even sales dollars is to use the mathematical equation.
In this equation, the variable costs are stated as a percent of sales. If a unit has a $3.00 selling
price and variable costs of $1.80, variable costs as a percent of sales is 60% ($1.80 ÷ $3.00).
Using fixed costs of $300,000, the break‐even equation is shown below.
The last calculation using the mathematical equation is the same as the break‐even sales formula
using the fixed costs and the contribution margin ratio previously discussed in this chapter.
Break‐even point in units. The break‐even point in units of 250,000 is calculated by dividing
fixed costs of $300,000 by contribution margin per unit of $1.20.
The break‐even point in units may also be calculated using the mathematical equation where “X”
equals break‐even units.
Again it should be noted that the last portion of the calculation using the mathematical equation
is the same as the first calculation of break‐even units that used the contribution margin per unit.
Once the break‐even point in units has been calculated, the break‐even point in sales dollars may
be calculated by multiplying the number of break‐even units by the selling price per unit. This
also works in reverse. If the break‐even point in sales dollars is known, it can be divided by the
selling price per unit to determine the break‐even point in units.
Contribution Margin
Break-even analysis also deals with the contribution margin of a product. The excess between
the selling price and total variable costs is known as contribution margin. For an example, if the
price of a product is Rs.100, total variable costs are Rs. 60 per product and fixed cost is Rs. 25
per product, the contribution margin of the product is Rs. 40 (Rs. 100 – Rs. 60). This Rs. 40
represents the revenue collected to cover the fixed costs. In the calculation of the contribution
margin, fixed costs are not considered.
P/V Ratio:
(i) It helps in the determination of Break-even-point [BEP = Fixed cost ÷ P/V ratio]