Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rad CS
Rad CS
Hand (oblique view) The oblique hand view is requested for • patient is seated alongside the table
diagnosing a variety of clinical indications such as • the a ected arm if possible is exed
rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, suspected
at 90° so the arm and hand can rest
Technical Factors fracture or dislocation and localising foreign
on the table
mAs - 3-5 • the hand is rotated externally by 45
kVp - 50-60 Technical evaluation degrees from the basic PA
position with ngers kept in
SID - 100cm • Fingers are positioned parallel to extension and parallel to image
image receptor, indicated by open receptor
interphalangeal and • shoulder, elbow, and wrist should all
Central Ray
metacarpophalangeal joint spaces. be in the transverse plane,
• third metacarpal head Correct obliquity is evidenced by perpendicular to the central beam
the following: • the hand and elbow should be at
Collimation • midshafts of 3rd to 5th shoulder height which makes radius
metacarpals do not overlap and ulna parallel (lowering the arm
• laterally to the skin margins
• proximal to include distal radioulnar joint
• some overlap of the distal heads of makes radius cross the ulna and
• distal to the tips of the distal phalanges thus relative shortening of radius)
lateral fan view: o ers a view of the individual middle and distal phalanges, avoiding overlap
lateral exion view
ball-catcher view (also known as Nørgaard projection): specialised view used to demonstrate the
metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, often requested in the context of rheumatoid arthritis
fi
fi
fi
ff
ff
ff
fl
fi
fi
ff
fl
fl
Scaphoid Series
Projection Clinical Indications Position
horizontal beam lateral view: modi ed lateral projection that requires little to no patient movement
produces a diagnostic lateral projection without risking patient pain
clenched st view: used for suspected scapholunate dissociation
ff
fi
fl
fi
Wrist Series
Projection Clinical Indications Position
horizontal beam lateral: modi ed lateral projection that requires little to no patient movement. produces a
diagnostic lateral/AP projection without risking patient pain
acute exion AP: modi ed AP projection when the patient cannot straighten the arm
inferosuperior view: modi ed elbow projection for patients in acute exion greater than 90 degrees
Coyle's view: an axial projection that focuses on the radial head, used when radial head fractures are
suspected
external oblique: an additional projection often performed to demonstrate the radial head free from
superimposition
internal oblique view: projection demonstrating the coronoid process in pro le
supracondylar AP
fi
fi
fl
fi
fi
fl
fi
fi
fi
fi
fl
fi
Humerus Series
Projection Clinical Indications Position
done to exclude large humeral shaft fractures or
Humerus (AP view) suspected symptomatic metastatic lesions. If an
occult fracture is suspected at either the
• the patient is preferably erect
proximal or distal end, it is best to do a separate
• the patient's back is against the
Technical Factors elbow or shoulder series.
image receptor
mAs - 60-70 • the a ected arm is abducted and
kVp - 7-15
Technical evaluation centred to the upright detector, if
possible, the arm is slightly
SID - 100cm • The humerus is positioned AP, externally rotated to mimic the true
evidenced by the medial and anatomical position
lateral epicondyles seen in pro le
Central Ray
and the greater tuberosity being
• mid humerus shaft
seen on the lateral aspect of the
Collimation humerus. The shaft is abducted
• superior to SM above the glenohumeral away from the patient's body,
joint minimising superimposition
• inferior to include the distal humerus
including the elbow joint
• lat. and med. to include the skin margin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2snumbdpMY
An ankle series and/or foot series may be required after the initial investigation to rule out further pathology.
Borden’s view: used to evaluate the posterior subtalar joint
Canale/Kelly view: used to evaluate the talar neck, anterior calcaneal process and calcaneocuboid joint well
visualised (also calcaneonavicular coalition)
ff
fl
fl
fl
fi
Foot Series
Projection Clinical Indications Position
This view demonstrates the location and extent
Foot (DP view) of fractures in the foot, joint space
abnormalities, soft tissue e usions and is the
frontal view for the examination of foreign • the patient may be supine or upright
Technical Factors bodies. depending on comfort
mAs - 3-4
Technical evaluation • the a ected leg must be exed
kVp - 50-55
enough that the plantar aspect of
SID - 100cm • 1st metatarsal has even concavity the foot is resting on the image
receptor
Central Ray
• the spaces between the 2nd to
• x-ray beam centred to the base of the
5th metatarsal are equal, yet the
3rd metatarsal bases are overlapping
• Beam angled - 10°-15 up jp depending on arch
• intertarsal space between
Collimation
the medial and intermediate cuneif
• lateral to the skin margins
• anterior to distal third of the foot
orm should be open
• posterior to the skin margins of the
Foot (medial oblique This view demonstrates the location and extent
view) of fractures in the foot and joint space
abnormalities. It is also used in the • the patient may be supine or upright
determination of osteomyelitis and examination depending on comfort
Technical Factors
of foreign bodies. • the a ected leg must be exed
mAs - 3-4 enough that the plantar aspect of
kVp - 55-60
Technical evaluation the foot is resting on the image
receptor
SID - 100cm • the foot is medially rotated until the
• entire calcaneus is visible from the
plantar surface sits at a 45° angle to
posterior tuberosity to the
Central Ray the image receptor
talocalcaneal joint
• 40° cephalad from the long axis of the foot
centred at the base of the 3rd metatarsal • sustentaculum tali is evident on the
(midfoot)
medial aspect of the image
Collimation
• lateral to the skin margins • subtalar joint should be visible on
• anterior to distal third of the foot the superior portion of the image
• posterior to the skin margins of the
weightbearing DP: the DP projection, however, weight-bearing. this projection is useful when observing how the
structures of the foot perform under weight
performed to assess for a dynamic widening of the Lisfranc joint, which would indicate a Lisfranc injury
weightbearing lateral: the lateral projection, however, weight-bearing. This projection is useful when observing
how the structures of the foot perform under weight
ff
ff
ff
ff
ff
ff
fl
fl
fl
ff
fi
Ankle Series
Projection Clinical Indications Position
-performed in the setting of ankle trauma and
Ankle (AP view) suspected ankle fractures in addition to
the lateral and mortise views of the ankle.
- show bony diseases or lesions of the distal • the patient may be supine or sitting
Technical Factors lower leg, talus and proximal fth metatarsal. upright with their leg straighten on
mAs - 3-4 the table
Technical evaluation
kVp - 50-55
• the foot is in dorsi exion
SID - 100cm
• the distal bula should be slightly
• the toes will be pointing directly
superimposed the distal tibia
toward the ceiling
Central Ray • the lateral and medial malleoli of
• the midpoint of the lateral and medial malleoli the distal bula and tibia are in
pro le
• the tibiotalar joint space should be
Collimation open, yet the full mortise joint
• laterally to the skin margins should not be visualised on the AP
• superior to examine the distal 1/3 T F
• inferior to the proximal aspect of the
Foot (medial oblique This view demonstrates the location and extent
view) of fractures in the foot and joint space
abnormalities. It is also used in the • the patient may be supine or upright
determination of osteomyelitis and examination depending on comfort
Technical Factors
of foreign bodies. • the a ected leg must be exed
mAs - 3-4 enough that the plantar aspect of
kVp - 55-60
Technical evaluation the foot is resting on the image
receptor
SID - 100cm • the foot is medially rotated until the
• entire calcaneus is visible from the
plantar surface sits at a 45° angle to
posterior tuberosity to the
Central Ray the image receptor
talocalcaneal joint
• 40° cephalad from the long axis of the foot
centred at the base of the 3rd metatarsal • sustentaculum tali is evident on the
(midfoot)
medial aspect of the image
Collimation
• lateral to the skin margins • subtalar joint should be visible on
• anterior to distal third of the foot the superior portion of the image
• posterior to the skin margins of the
weightbearing DP: the DP projection, however, weight-bearing. this projection is useful when observing how the
structures of the foot perform under weight
performed to assess for a dynamic widening of the Lisfranc joint, which would indicate a Lisfranc injury
weightbearing lateral: the lateral projection, however, weight-bearing. This projection is useful when observing
how the structures of the foot perform under weight
fi
ff
ff
ff
ff
fi
fi
fl
fl
fl
ff
fi
fi
Projection Position
Clinical Indications
Calcaneus (axial view) This projection is best used to visualise
pathologies or fractures resulting in medial • patient is supine or seated with the
or lateral displacement 2. Its diagnostic
a ected limb extended 2
Technical Factors
• the posterior aspect of the ankle is
mAs - 8-15 resting on the image receptor 2
kVp - 65-75
Technical evaluation • foot is dorsi exed until the plantar
surface is running perpendicular to
SID - 100cm the image receptor
• entire calcaneus is visible from the
• dorsi exion can be aided with tape
posterior tuberosity to the
Central Ray or fabric wrapped around the distal
talocalcaneal joint
• 40° cephalad from the long axis of the foot phalanges to be pulled backwards
centred at the base of the 3rd metatarsal by the patient, this should only be
• sustentaculum tali is evident on the
(midfoot) performed if the patient can tolerate
medial aspect of the image
Collimation
it
• lateral to the skin margins • subtalar joint should be visible on
• anterior to distal third of the foot the superior portion of the image
• posterior to the skin margins of the
Projection Position
Clinical Indications
Calcaneus (axial view) This projection is best used to visualise
pathologies or fractures resulting in medial • patient is supine or seated with the
or lateral displacement 2. Its diagnostic
a ected limb extended 2
Technical Factors
• the posterior aspect of the ankle is
mAs - 8-15 resting on the image receptor 2
kVp - 65-75
Technical evaluation • foot is dorsi exed until the plantar
surface is running perpendicular to
SID - 100cm the image receptor
• entire calcaneus is visible from the
• dorsi exion can be aided with tape
posterior tuberosity to the
Central Ray or fabric wrapped around the distal
talocalcaneal joint
• 40° cephalad from the long axis of the foot phalanges to be pulled backwards
centred at the base of the 3rd metatarsal by the patient, this should only be
• sustentaculum tali is evident on the
(midfoot) performed if the patient can tolerate
medial aspect of the image
Collimation
it
• lateral to the skin margins • subtalar joint should be visible on
• anterior to distal third of the foot the superior portion of the image
• posterior to the skin margins of the
ff
ff
ff
fl
fl
fl
fl
fl
fl