Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Huang2019 Article InvestigationOnMicroecologyOfH
Huang2019 Article InvestigationOnMicroecologyOfH
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-019-00345-8 (0123456789().,-volV)
( 01234567
89().,-volV)
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 28 March 2019 / Accepted: 30 May 2019 / Published online: 26 June 2019
Ó Springer Nature B.V. 2019
123
506 Mycopathologia (2019) 184:505–515
Keywords Androgenetic alopecia Fungal of colonized fungi in healthy people. But the turbu-
microecology Malassezia High-throughput lence of the percentage of microorganisms will
sequencing contribute to AGA. As early as 1998, Piérard et al.
[11] found that use of 2% ketoconazole shampoo in
androgenetic alopecia increased the hair’s density,
diameter, and proportion of hair follicles where the
Introduction effect was almost equivalent to the treatment by
topical 2% minoxidil solution. The mechanistic study
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) remains one of the most indicated that ketoconazole has anti-infective effects
common hair loss diseases, which is characterized by a against the microflora on the scalp, especially
progressive decrease in hair density, becoming thin- Malassezia, which played therapeutic roles in andro-
ner, sparse, and with lighter color hair. It has been gen alopecia. In recent years, studies have shown that
divided into male pattern alopecia and female pattern micro-inflammatory reactions brought about in the
alopecia based on gender difference [1]. The occur- hair follicles of androgenetic alopecia patients, which
rence of AGA has been considered to have a great may be related to hair loss [11, 12]. This hair follicle
negative impact on the patient’s psychology and the microinflammation differs from the process of inflam-
quality of life [2, 3]. Therefore, research related to mation and destruction in typical scar alopecia. It
AGA has attracted much attention. In past studies, progresses slowly, concealed, and is unnoticeable.
AGA was considered to be a polygenic hereditary Propionibacterium, Staphylococcus, Malassezia, or
disease caused by interactions between multiple genes Demodex are related to microorganisms. Organism
and environmental factors [4, 5]. It was confirmed that toxins may be involved in inflammatory responses.
the two major genetic risk loci are the X chromosome The influence of microbiota on androgenetic alopecia
AR/EDA2R locus and the PAX1/FOXA2 locus resid- has received abundant attention [12, 13]. Keisha et al.
ing on chromosome 20 [6–8]. In addition, androgen [14] collected 14 samples from ten healthy adults and
receptor regulatory genes modulated the sensitivity of sequenced DNA of the fungus samples. The study
the androgen receptor [9]. Recently, researches have found abundant Malassezia in the head and trunk and
proposed that the micro-inflammatory reaction of hair further confirmed that elucidating of fungal and
follicles in the pathology of AGA patients with scalp bacterial ecosystems on the human body will con-
was distinctive from the typical inflammation and tribute to a more comprehensive understanding of skin
destruction process of scar alopecia, and it was diseases.
involved in the development of AGA and its hair The present study focused on differences in the
follicle inflammation rendered the slower process, hairy root fungal microecology between androgenetic
which was hidden and difficult to detect. This may be a alopecia patients and healthy people. Through the
chemical stress response [10] caused by UV, cosmet- high-throughput sequencing method technique, we
ics, cosmetic agents, contaminants, and photochemi- obtained more precise data about hairy root fungal
cal damage. More severely, the process of AGA microecology and have further understood the patho-
folliculitis may be related to the local inflammatory genic mechanism of AGA.
response [11] to the microbial toxins associated with
Propionibacterium, Staphylococcus, Malassezia, or
Demodex. Materials and Methods
Malassezia spp. is a resident flora on the skin of
humans and animals and a kind of lipophilic yeast. At Hair Loss Group Inclusion Criteria
present, 11 out of the above 17 species of Malassezia
have been demonstrated to be involved in the human
1. According to ‘‘Chinese Clinical Dermatology’’
skin microecology [12]. Since the growth of Malasse-
[1], the clinical manifestations of androgenetic
zia is dependent on lipids (except for M. pachyder-
alopecia can be described as male appearance of
matis), they are mainly distributed in areas rich in
the forehead on both sides with less, thin, sparse
sebum, such as the scalp, face, and chest and back,
hair gradually extended toward the top of the head,
which account for about 50–80% of the total number
123
Mycopathologia (2019) 184:505–515 507
with the frontal part of the hair retrusion; the of healthy and adolescents with androgenetic alopecia,
forehead becomes high, forming a ‘‘high amount,’’ and on hair roots in different parts of healthy scalp.
frontal hairline with M-shaped, starting to fall off The subjects were divided into four groups: alopecia
from the top of the head. With progressive develop- areata group, alopecia occipital group, control top
ment, the frontal area and the top hair loss area would group, and control occipital group. Each group had ten
integrate with each other. The hair loss area consisted specimens. High-throughput sequencing was per-
of smooth skin with no atrophy, and visible fine formed on the four groups of samples for sequencing
armpit hair. It may be accompanied by increased analysis.
sebum secretion with no other symptoms. According
to the Hamilton classification, male patients with Subject Recruitment
alopecia grades III–IV were recruited. Females
demonstrated the phenotype that the hair on the top The tests were conducted on the patients and healthy
of the head gradually became less, sparse and volunteers, and they were informed about the test.
generally did not involve the forehead. According
to the Ludwig classification, female patients with Sample Collection
grade II hair loss were selected. Perms and hair dyes
were not used 2 months prior the treatment. Anti-
1. Subjects were prohibited from shampooing for
hair loss shampoo was also not used. Oral or topical
48 h prior testing.
antifungal preparations were not given within
2. Gentle pull of selected hair, and remove the top
1 month prior the treatment. No scalp-related dis-
and occipital loose hair.
eases such as scalp folliculitis, head lice, and alopecia
3. With the help of sterile eye occlusion clip hair
areata were detected in the experimental subjects.
distal and a ruler, the hair from hair follicle
The control group included the following criteria: measuring 1.5 cm long was selected. It was stored
(1) the age and sex of healthy volunteers were in a sterile EP tube, and it was preserved at
basically matched with those who participated in the - 20 °C for further examination.
hair loss group; (2) perms and hair dyes were not used
2 months prior the treatment. Anti-hair loss shampoo
DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification
was also not used; (3) oral or topical antifungal
preparations were not given within 1 month prior the
Microbial DNA was extracted from hair follicle
treatment; (4) no scalp-related diseases such as scalp
samples using the E.Z.N.A.Ò soil DNA Kit (Omega
folliculitis, head lice, and alopecia areata were
Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the man-
observed in the individuals.
ufacturer’s protocol. The final DNA concentration and
purity were determined by NanoDrop 2000 UV–Vis
Observation of Fungi
spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington,
USA), and DNA quality was checked by 1% agarose
The morphological observation of fungi was per-
gel electrophoresis. The ITS region of the fungal
formed by using hair roots samples. Electron micro-
rRNA gene was amplified with primers ITS1F (50 -
scope (Hitachi, Japan) observations were divided into
CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-30 ) and 2043R
two groups: alopecia group and control group. Each
(50 -GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-30 ) by thermo-
group had ten specimens. Three cases of Malassezia
cycler PCR system (GeneAmp 9700, ABI, USA).
positive specimens were selected for further observa-
The PCRs were conducted using the following
tion by using scanning electron microscopy and
program: 3 min of denaturation at 95 °C, 27 cycles
transmission electron microscopy.
of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s for annealing at 55 °C, 45 s for
elongation at 72 °C, and a final extension at 72 °C for
Sequencing Analysis for Fungi
10 min. PCRs were performed in triplicate 20 lL
mixture containing 4 lL of 5 9 FastPfu Buffer, 2 lL
The diversity analysis of fungal microbiota (FM) was
of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 lL of each primer (5 lM),
performed on hair roots in different parts of the scalp
0.4 lL of FastPfu Polymerase, and 10 ng of template
123
508 Mycopathologia (2019) 184:505–515
Statistical Analysis
Results
123
Mycopathologia (2019) 184:505–515 509
1 Male 32 ? Male 39 ?
2 Male 45 - Male 54 ?
3 Male 38 - Male 44 ?
4 Female 28 - Female 33 -
5 Male 40 - Male 30 --
6 Female 35 ? Female 26 ?
7 Male 52 ? Male 40 ?
8 Female 35 - Female 37 -
9 Female 46 ? Female 48 ?
10 Male 56 - Male 54 -
Positive % 40% 60%*
*P \ 0.01
Fig. 2 SEM observation of hair root in AGA patients. There are more Malassezia yeast cells (characteristic collar-like
SEM 9 1000 (a), 9 2000 (b), 9 5000 (c), 9 10,000 structures at the bud) observed at the hair root in AGA patients
(d) 9 4000 (e) male patients, 39 years old, hair loss for 6 years.
(red mark, 73.16%) and Basidiomycota (green mark, mainly composed of Ascomycota (red mark, 63.78%)
24.94%), and Zygomycota (blue marker, 0.49%); other and Basidiomycota (green mark, 34.37%), and Zy-
categories accounted for 1.41%. In the control group, gomycota (blue logo, 0.62%); other categories
the occipital area of the control group (OCG) was accounted for 1.23%. The hair roots of the scalp
123
510 Mycopathologia (2019) 184:505–515
Fig. 3 SEM observation of hair root in AGA patients. tissue (red arrow) has Malassezia yeast cells embedded in hair
TEM 9 0.5 K (a), 9 1.5 K (b), 9 4.0 K (c), 9 6.0 K (d), roots of AGA patients (white arrows, with a distinctive zigzag
male patient, 28 years old, 5-year hair loss. The superficial structure on the inside of the cell wall)
alopecia area (TBG, the top of bald group) of the hair Fusarium: 13.49% at the top of the control group and
loss group were mainly Ascomycota (green marking, 3.20% at the occipital region; 2.3% at the top of the
35.58%) and Basidiomycota (red marking, 61.03%) alopecia group and 4.11% at the occipital region.
and Zygomycota (blue logo, 0.40%), and other cate- Malassezia: 8.64% at the top of the control group and
gories accounted for 2.99%. The hairy root fungus of 11.64% at the occipital area; 31.44% at the top of the
the OBG (the occipital of bald group) was dominated alopecia group and 20.57% at the occipital region.
by Ascomycota (green marker, 41.18%) and Basid- Epiconc (Epicoccum): 8.69% at the top of the control
iomycota (red marker, 54.21%), and phyla (Zygomy- group and 11.30% at the occipital area; 0.31% at the
cota (blue logo, 1.87%); other categories accounted top of the alopecia group and 0.42% at the occipital
for 2.74% (Fig. 4). region. Trichosporon: 5.81% at the top of the control
group and 8.53% at the occipital region; 13.45% at the
High-Throughput Sequencing Indicated Changes top of the hair loss group and 15.22% at the occipital
of Fungal Genera in Hairy Root Between Hair Loss region. Alternaria: 4.48% at the top of the control
Group and the Control Group group and 5.99% at the occipital region; 1.14% at the
top of the alopecia group and 1.01% at the occipital
In order to understand the changes of fungal genera in region. Cladosporium: 3.55% at the top of the control
hair root at different parts of the scalp in the hair loss group and 5.21% at the occipital region; 2.26% at the
group and the control group, we used high-throughput top of the alopecia group and 1.99% at the occipital
sequencing methods to detect the fungal genera. Some region. Cryptococcus: 2.78% at the top of the control
of the fungal species that varied by more than 1% were group and 4.11% at the occipital region; 3.78% at the
123
Mycopathologia (2019) 184:505–515 511
Fig. 4 Distribution column of hairy root fungi in different parts are mainly Ascomycota (red mark) and the top of bald group
of the scalp of the control group and the hair loss group. The top (TBG). The occipital of bald group (OBG) is dominated by the
of control group (TCG) and the occipital of control group (OCG) Basidiomycota (green marker). (Color figure online)
top of the hair loss group and 6.91% at the occipital of Malassezia on the scalp (6.7E ? 06(6.8E ? 05,
region. Candida: 2.21% at the top of the control group 9.0E ? 06)) was higher than that on the occipital
and 4.53% at the occipital region; 5.32% at the top of region (1.1E ? 06(5.7E ? 05, 2.6E ? 06)) (P \ 0.05).
the alopecia group and 5.87% at the occipital region. In the control group, no significant difference was
Aspergillus: 1.91% at the top of the control group and observed in the amount of Malassezia between
3.68% at the occipital region; 5.56% at the top of the calvaria area group (2.6E ? 05(1.2E ? 05, 1.2E ?
alopecia group and 5.03% at the occipital region. 06)) and the occipital area group (5.3E ?
Exophiala: 2.15% at the top of the control group and 05(9.0E ? 04, 7.5E ? 05)) (P [ 0.05) (Table 2).
1.75% at the occipital region; 1.92% at the top of the The load of Malassezia globosa in the hair loss
hair loss group and 1.83% at the occipital region group on calvaria area (5.2E ? 05(2.0E ? 05,
(Fig. 5). 2.2E ? 06)) was higher than that in control group
(6.7E ? 04(2.2E ? 04, 2.4E ? 05)), and occipital
The Comparison of Fungal Loads of Malassezia area (3.4E ? 05(1.1E ? 05, 6.7E ? 05)) of hair loss
in Different Groups and Scalp Areas group was also higher than that of control group
(8.1E ? 04(3.0E ? 04, 2.6E ? 05)) (P \ 0.05). The
The load of Malassezia in different parts of the scalp is load of Malassezia restricta in the hair loss group on
shown in Tables 2, 3, and 4. The load of Malassezia calvaria area (5.2E ? 05(2.2E ? 05, 3.1E ? 06))
located on calvaria in the alopecia group was higher than that in control group (1.1E ?
(6.7E ? 06(6.8E ? 05, 9.0E ? 06)) was significantly 05(1.0E ? 04, 2.1E ? 05)), and the load of Malasse-
higher than that in the control group (2.6E ? zia restricta in the hair loss group on occipital area
05(1.2E ? 05, 1.2E ? 06)) (P \ 0.05) (Table 2). (4.4E ? 05(2.0E ? 05, 8.3E ? 05)) was also higher
No significant difference was detected in the load of than that in control group (1.4E ? 05(3.1E ? 04,
Malassezia located on occipital between the hair loss 2.0E ? 05)) (P \ 0.05). And no significant difference
group (1.1E ? 06(5.7E ? 05, 2.6E ? 06)) and con- was detected in the amount of Malassezia globosa or
trol group (5.3E ? 05(9.0E ? 04, 7.5E ? 05)) Malassezia restricta between calvaria area and occip-
(P [ 0.05) (Table 2). In the alopecia group, the load ital area (P [ 0.05) (Tables 3, 4).
123
512 Mycopathologia (2019) 184:505–515
Fig. 5 Horizontal distribution bar graph of hairy root fungal occipital of bald group (OBG) compared to the control group,
genus of hair loss group and control group. Compared with the followed by Trichosporon (green flag) increase, and Fusarium
control group, the alopecia group had a marked increase in (Fusarium, yellow flag) and Epicoccum (Epicoccum, blue flag)
Malassezia (red mark) from the top of bald group (TBG) and the showed a decreasing trend. (Color figure online)
Hair loss 12 6.7E ? 06(6.8E ? 05, 9.0E ? 06) 1.1E ? 06(5.7E ? 05, 2.6E ? 06) - 2.194 0.028
Control 12 2.6E ? 05(1.2E ? 05, 1.2E ? 06) 5.3E ? 05(9.0E ? 04, 7.5E ? 05) - 0.115 0.908
Z - 3.233 - 1.848
P 0.001 0.065
Table 3 Malassezia globosa loads in different groups and different scalp areas
Group n Calvaria Occipital Z P
Hair loss 12 5.2E ? 05(2.0E ? 05, 2.2E ? 06) 3.4E ? 05(1.1E ? 05, 6.7E ? 05) - 1.155 0.248
Control 12 6.7E ? 04(2.2E ? 04, 2.4E ? 05) 8.1E ? 04(3.0E ? 04, 2.6E ? 05) - 0.115 0.908
Z - 2.944 - 2.309
P 0.003 0.021
123
Mycopathologia (2019) 184:505–515 513
Table 4 Malassezia restricta loads in different groups and different scalp areas 0.007
Group n Calvaria Occipital Z P
Hair loss 12 5.2E ? 05(2.2E ? 05, 3.1E ? 06) 4.4E ? 05(2.0E ? 05, 8.3E ? 05) - 0.115 0.908
Control 12 1.1E ? 05(1.0E ? 04, 2.1E ? 05) 1.4E ? 05(3.1E ? 04, 2.0E ? 05) - 0.404 0.686
Z - 2.829 - 2.714
P 0.005 0.007
123
514 Mycopathologia (2019) 184:505–515
enzyme activity, and the expression of inflammatory between calvaria area and occipital area are accomplished by
cytokines will cause erosive damage to hair roots. Research Core Facility of West China Hospital.
Malassezia increases the secretion of cytokines, which Compliance with Ethical Standards
may cause micro-inflammatory reactions around the
scalp and around the hair follicles. It is significantly Conflict of interest All authors declare that they have no
involved in the process of androgenic alopecia. conflict of interest.
Moreover, it was demonstrated that glands and
inflammatory cell infiltration around hair follicles
were caused by Malassezia by the previous research References
published in British Journal of Dermatology [21].
1. Xu F, Sheng YY, Mu ZL, et al. Prevalence and types of
Compared with healthy people, the abundance of androgenetic alopecia in Shanghai, China: a community-
fungal microecological in the hair roots of androge- based study. Brit J Dermatol. 2010;160(3):629–32.
netic alopecia patients has led to the increase in 2. Kranz D. Young men’s coping with androgenetic alopecia:
Malassezia genus species such as Malassezia globosa acceptance counts when hair gets thinner. Body Image.
2011;8(4):343–8.
and Malassezia restricta species most significantly 3. Girman CJ, Hartmaier S, Roberts J, et al. Patient-perceived
seen in hair loss areas (Tables 2, 3, 4). Malassezia importance of negative effects of androgenetic alopecia in
played opposite role in healthy people and AGA women. J Women Health Gen. 1999;8(8):1091–5.
patients because of the different scalp microecology 4. Yin B, Xiao Y, Ran Y, et al. Microsporum canis infection in
three familial cases with tinea capitis and tinea corporis.
environments. It maintains a harmonious and balanced Mycopathologia. 2013;176(3–4):259–65.
symbiotic relationship with the host in healthy people. 5. Lolli F, Pallotti F, Rossi A, et al. Androgenetic alopecia: a
When AGA occurs, because of the increase in local review. Endocrine. 2017;57(1):9–17.
scalp oil content, the original microbial environment 6. Levy-Nissenbaum E, Bar-Natan M, Frydman M, et al.
Confirmation of the association between male pattern
has changed and then leads to the growth and baldness and the androgen receptor gene. Eur J Dermatol.
reproduction of Malassezia. Invasive enzymes pro- 2005;15(5):339–40.
duced by Malassezia and interleukins produced by 7. Prodi DA, Pirastu N, Maninchedda G, et al. EDA2R is
keratinocytes will change the abundance of Malasse- associated with androgenetic alopecia. J Invest Dermatol.
2008;128(9):2268–70.
zia species (such as the increase in Malassezia globosa 8. Richards JB, Yuan X, Geller F, et al. Male-pattern baldness
and Malassezia restricta) and break the original susceptibility locus at 20p11. Nat Genet. 2008;40(11):
micro-ecological balance. It will produce the micro- 1282–4.
inflammatory reaction around the hair follicle and 9. Hillmer AM, Hanneken S, Ritzmann S, et al. Genetic
variation in the human androgen receptor gene is the major
continues to participate in the entire process of determinant of common early-onset androgenetic alopecia.
androgenetic alopecia. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77(1):140–8.
10. Philpott MP, Sanders DA, Bowen J, et al. Effects of inter-
leukins, colony-stimulating factor and tumour necrosis
factor on human hair follicle growth in vitro: a possible role
Conclusion for interleukin-1 and tumour necrosis factor-a in alopecia
areata. Brit J Dermatol. 1996;135(6):942–8.
The load of Malassezia was significantly increased in 11. Mahé YF, Michelet JF, Billoni N, et al. Androgenetic
the patients with androgenic alopecia, and it had a alopecia and microinflammation. Int J Dermatol.
2010;39(8):576–84.
positive correlation with the incidence rate of andro- 12. Meray Y, Gencalp D, Guran M. Putting it all together to
genic alopecia. We hypothesized that Malassezia is understand the role of Malassezia spp. Dandruff Etiol.
involved in the hair follicles inflammation of AGA 2018;183(6):893–903.
patients and the strategy of controlling the fungal 13. Grice EA, Dawson TL. Host–microbe interactions: malas-
sezia and human skin. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;40:81–7.
ecology of scalp will have more vital value in the 14. Piérardfranchimont C, Doncker PD, Cauwenbergh G, et al.
treatment of AGA. Ketoconazole shampoo: effect of long-term use in andro-
genic alopecia. Dermatology. 1997;196(4):474–7.
Acknowledgements We are grateful to all the team members 15. Findley K, Oh J, Yang J, et al. Topographic diversity of
who worked hard for the experiment, and all the volunteers who fungal and bacterial communities in human skin. Nature.
provided their hair specimens. Moreover, the measurements of 2013;498(7454):367–70.
the colonies of Malassezia globosa or Malassezia restricta
123
Mycopathologia (2019) 184:505–515 515
16. Lauer A, Hernandez T. Cutaneous bacterial species from 20. Balato A, Paoletti I, De GV, et al. Tacrolimus does not alter
Lithobates catesbeianus can inhibit pathogenic dermato- the production of several cytokines and antimicrobial pep-
phytes. Mycopathologia. 2015;179(3–4):259–68. tide in Malassezia furfur-infected-keratinocytes. J Mycoses.
17. Lederberg J, Mccray A. ‘Ome Sweet ‘Omics—a 2014;57(3):176–83.
genealogical treasury of words. Sci Mag Life Sci. 21. Pradhan S, Ran X, Zhang C, et al. Cover image: naevus
2001;15(8):8. sebaceus affected by overgrowth of Malassezia globosa.
18. Juntachai W, Kajiwara S. Differential expression of extra- Brit J Dermatol. 2018;179(6):1432–3.
cellular lipase and protease activities of mycelial and yeast
forms in malassezia furfur. Mycopathologia.
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with
2015;180(3–4):143–51.
regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
19. Gao Z, Perezperez GI, Chen Y, et al. Quantitation of major
institutional affiliations.
human cutaneous bacterial and fungal populations. Eur J
Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(10):3575.
123