Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 41

Safety Relief Valves Sizing

Link: https://processpocket.streamlit.app/Safety%20Valves%20Sizing

This tool was developed for process engineers to quickly estimate the outcome of the safety relief valve sizing
equations on site. As a part of a larger project to develop what is similar to Carl Branan’s book “process
engineers Pocket Handbook” these tools would allow a process engineer to quickly calculate/estimate
equipment efficiencies or sizing using standardized calculations

The aim here is to take little-known data from the field (flow, pressures, temperatures, compositions..etc.) and
use it as input for a rough estimation without having to return to the office to use commercial software or
calculations Excel sheets to validate or to calculate. Additionally, these tools may also serve as a gathered data
validation tool.

Nomenclature

Tn Temperature (oK) P Pressure (kPa)


T Temperature at relieving conditions (oK) P1/s/c/back Relief/Set/critical/back pressures (kPa)
a Temperature of insulation outer surface (1177 oK) t Thickness of insulation (m)
𝜆 Latent heat of vaporization (kcal/kg) M Molecular weight M.wt
H Enthalpy (kcal/kg) µ Viscosity (cP)
Re Reynold’s number k Gas specific heat ratio
ρ Density (kg/m3) αv cubical expansion coefficient (1/°K)
D Diameter (m) Cp Heat Capacity (Kg/Kcal.hr. oC)
L Length (m) Aw Wetted area (m2)
W W Required relieving capacity (kg/hr) A/Acalc Minimum required effective discharge area (mm2)
Q Required relieving capacity (Nm3 /min or Ae Effective area (mm2)
L/min for liquids)
Q Relief Load (kW or kcal/hr) G Specific gravity
h Depth of wetted portion (m) Z Compressibility factor
L1 NLL in vessel/column (m) F Environmental factor
C Coefficient determined from an expression of F2 Coefficient for subcritical gas flow sizing
the ratio of specific heats of the gas or vapor equation
U Heat transfer coefficient (kcal/(m2.h°C)) L2 Elevation above grade (m)
Kd The effective coefficient of discharge v Velocity (m/s)
KSH superheated correction factor (steam) Kb Capacity correction factor due to backpressure
Kv Viscosity correction factor (liquid) KN Correction factor for Napier equation (steam)
Kc Combination correction factor Kw Backpressure correction factor (liquid)
Input Required
Table 1: Note 1: Input required depending on the case

1. Calculating Relieving/Set Pressure 2. Relief Loads Estimation (Cont.)


Case (non-fire/fire) - Closed Outlet (Heat Exchangers)
o
MAWP kg/cm².g Hot side inlet temperature C
Design Pressure (if Set pressure kg/cm².g Normal Cold Side rate Kg/hr
doesn’t equal MAWP)
Disc Installation Type (If multiple One/additional/ Normal Cold Side composition %vol
device installation is chosen) Supplemental
o
2. Relief Loads Estimation Normal Cold Side conditions (T&P) C/ kg/cm².a
External Fire (Vaporization) Inadvertent Control Valve opening
normal stream composition %vol Control valve size inch
o
normal stream conditions (T&P) C/ kg/cm².a Control Valve opening %
Aw calculations m2 Control valve inlet and outlet %vol
(If the stream is liquid, it appears) stream composition
o
Type of Equipment Control valve inlet and outlet C/ kg/cm².a
normal stream conditions (T&P)
Geometry inputs m Thermal Expansion
Heat Absorbed kW Relieved stream composition %vol
o
External Fire (Gas expansion) Relieved stream conditions (T&P) C/ kg/cm².a
Same input + Max. Heat load Kcal/hr
o
vessel maximum wall temperature C 3. Gas or Vapor/ Steam
Closed Outlet (Vessel) Mass flow rate Kg/hr
Vessel Feed rate Kg/hr inlet/outlet stream composition %vol
o
feed composition and %vol Inlet (relieved) stream conditions (T&P) C/ kg/cm².a
o o
feed stream conditions (T&P) C/ kg/cm².a Outlet (relief header) stream conditions (T&P) C/ kg/cm².a
Feed vapor mass fraction (if not 0-1 range Kb, kd, kc input (optional) -
calculated)
Closed Outlet (Vessel with reboiler) 3. Liquid
Same + Same +
Kw, kd, kc input (optional) -
Output Obtained
1. Calculating Relieving/Set Pressure 3. Liquid
Max. accumulated pressure kg/cm².g Max. Flow Capacity Kg/hr
Relief device set pressure kg/cm².g Physical properties used in Kg/m3/cP
calculations: Density/ µ
Allowable overpressure kg/cm² Kw,kd,kc -
Overpressure % Minimum area cm2/in2
Relieving pressure kg/cm².a Selected Area cm2/in2
2. Relief Loads Estimation Orifice Designation
Calculated Relief Load kW Permissible inlet/outlet nozzles inches
Calculated Relieving flow rate Kg/hr Table of Calculations -
3. Gas or Vapor/ Steam Specifications sheet -
Flow Critical/Subcritical
Max. Flow Capacity Kg/hr
Physical properties used in -/cP/-/-
calculations: average cp/cv, µ, M.wt, Z
Kb,kd,kc + (kSH, kN) for steam -
Minimum area cm2/in2
Selected Area cm2/in2
Orifice Designation
Permissible inlet/outlet nozzles inches
Table of Calculations -
Specifications sheet -

1. Introduction
Sizing pressure relief valves (PSV) requires a vivid understanding of the process where the safety valves are
installed, the sizing equations, and the numerous relevant standards. In this document, we’ll be exploring the
hand calculations required to preliminary size different safety valves. First, we’ll explore how to estimate the
relieving and set pressures according to standards. Secondly, we’ll explore the basic safety orifices sizing
equations (for gases, steam, or liquids) and learn how to estimate the required coefficients. Finally, we’ll take a
glance at how to estimate the required relief loads for different processes and contingencies as an introduction
to this complex matter. However, the back pressure calculations were not discussed in this document. The
backpressure used in safety calculations is the sum of superimposed backpressure and built-up back pressure.
The superimposed backpressure is the static pressure and the relief header before the valve opening, while the
built-up back pressure is the pressure increase due to the valve opening building up extra pressure to overcome
the outlet friction losses. The estimation of the built-up back pressure could be discussed later in the context of
flare systems calculations.

This document did not discuss the various safety valve types' working mechanisms, the rupture disc types and
sizing procedures, or guidelines for sizing the inlet/outlet piping of PSV. However, you may find the mentioned
topics in references and recommended reads.
2. Set/relief Pressure Calculations
Table 2.1: Relief Pressure estimation table (percentages are applied to MAWP’s gauge pressures) [1]
Contingency Installation Single-Valve Installations Multiple-Valve Installations
Set Pressure Max. Accumulated Set Pressure Max. Accumulated
(%) pressure (%) (%) pressure (%)

Non-fire only First valve 100 110 [1] 100 116 [2]

Additional valve(s) --- --- 105 116 [2]


Fire only First valve 100 121 100 121

Additional valve(s) --- --- 105 121


Supplemental valve --- --- 110 121
Note : All values are percentages of the maximum allowable working pressure.
(1) 10% or 3 psi (0.21 kglcm2), whichever is greater.
(2) 16% or 4 psi (0.28 kg/cm2), whichever is greater.
(3) A supplemental valve installation provides relieving capacity for an additional hazard created by exposure to
fire or other unexpected sources of external heat. Supplemental valves are used only in addition to valves sized
for operating (non-fire) contingencies. [3]
(4) In the case of ASME-application liquid service valves (that is, for protection of a liquid-full vessel), maximum
accumulated pressure is limited to 110% of the maximum allowable working pressure for operating
contingencies. In the case of non-ASME-application liquid service valves (for protection of piping without vessels
included), 25 % overpressure is generally specified. [3]
(5) The minimum pressure differentials between the set pressure of the valve and the operation pressure of the
vessel are recommended as follows:
Table 2.2: minimum differential pressure limitations [3]
Set Pressure Ps Minimum recommended
Pressure differential
Ps ≤ 70 psi (4.9 kg/cm2) 5 psi (0.35 kg/cm2)
Ps ≤ 1000 psi (70 kg/cm2) 10% of Ps
Ps > 1000 psi (70 kg/cm2) 7% of Ps
Figure 2.1: Pressure Level Relationships for Pressure-relief Valves [1]
3. Safety Relief Valves Sizing

Gases Steam Liquids

Subcritical Flow Critical Flow

17.9 ∗ 𝑊 ∗ √𝑇𝑍 𝑊 ∗ √𝑇𝑍


𝐴= 𝐴=
𝐹2 𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑐 √𝑀𝑃1 (𝑃1 − 𝑃2 ) 𝐶𝐾𝑑 𝑃1 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐 √𝑀
47.95 ∗ 𝑄 ∗ √𝑇𝑀𝑍 2.676 ∗ 𝑄 ∗ √𝑇𝑀𝑍
𝐴= 𝐴=
𝐹2 𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑐 √𝑃1 (𝑃1 − 𝑃2 ) 𝐶𝐾𝑑 𝑃1 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐
258 ∗ 𝑄 ∗ √𝑇𝐺𝑍 14.41 ∗ 𝑄 ∗ √𝑇𝐺𝑍
𝐴= 𝐴=
𝐹2 𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑐 √𝑃1 (𝑃1 − 𝑃2 ) 𝐶𝐾𝑑 𝑃1 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐

𝑃1 190.5 ∗ 𝑊 11.78𝑄√𝐺
Acalc 𝑇= ∗𝑇 𝐴= 𝐴=
𝑃𝑛 𝑛 𝑃1 𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑠ℎ 𝐾𝑁 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐 𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑤 𝐾𝑣 𝐾𝑐 √𝑃1 − 𝑃2
𝑃𝐶𝑓 2 𝑘⁄(𝑘−1)
=[ ]
𝑃1 𝑘+1
2 𝑘+1/𝑘−1
𝐶 = 0.03948√𝑘 [ ]
𝑘+1
𝑘 1 − 𝑟 (𝑘−1)/𝑘
𝐹2 = √[ ] 𝑟 2/𝑘 [ ]
𝑘−1 1−𝑟

𝑊𝑟𝑒𝑞 ∗ 𝐴𝑒 𝑊𝑟𝑒𝑞 ∗ 𝐴𝑒 𝑊𝑟𝑒𝑞 ∗ 𝐴𝑒


Wmax[3]
𝐴𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐 𝐴𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐 𝐴𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐

A: mm2
A: mm2 A: mm2
W: kg/h
W: kg/h Q: L/min
Units Q: Nm3/min
P1,P2: kPa P1,P2: kPag
P1,P2: kPa
T: Kelvin T: Kelvin
T: Kelvin
W (kg/h ) = 0.044 * M.wt * Q (Nm3/hr)
Q (Nm3/min) = Q (Nm3/hr)/60
Conversion Q (L/min) = Q (m3/hr) *16.67
Notes P (kPa) = P (kg/cm2) * 98.0665
A (cm2) = A (mm2)*0.01
A (in2) = A (cm2) * 0.155
Table 3.1: Table of single-phase relief valve sizing equations [1]
NOTE 1: The Napier coefficient KN must be considered when P1 ≥ 106.5 kg/cm2a.
NOTE 2: for gas equations
Kd = effective coefficient of discharge. For preliminary sizing, use the following values:
= 0.975 when a pressure relief valve is installed with or without a rupture disk in combination.
= 0.62 when a pressure relief valve is not installed and sizing is for rapture disk
Wrated = maximum rated flow rate through the valve
3.1 Gas PSV Sizing[1]
1. Estimate if flow is critical or sub-critical from the following equation

2 𝑘/𝑘+1
𝑃𝑐 = 𝑃1 ∗ [ ] , where
𝑘+1

Pc is the critical pressure, P1 is the upstream pressure (relieving), both in absolute units
k is the specific heats ratio for any ideal gas

2. Based on the flow condition, you can proceed with one of the following equations:

Sub-critical Flow Critical Flow


Pc < Pback Pc > Pback
17.9 ∗ 𝑊 ∗ √𝑇𝑍 𝑊 ∗ √𝑇𝑍
𝐴= 𝐴=
𝐹2 𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑐 √𝑀𝑃1 (𝑃1 − 𝑃2 ) 𝐶𝐾𝑑 𝑃1 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐 √𝑀
47.95 ∗ 𝑄 ∗ √𝑇𝑀𝑍 2.676 ∗ 𝑄 ∗ √𝑇𝑀𝑍
𝐴= 𝐴=
𝐹2 𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑐 √𝑃1 (𝑃1 − 𝑃2 ) 𝐶𝐾𝑑 𝑃1 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐
258 ∗ 𝑄 ∗ √𝑇𝐺𝑍 14.41 ∗ 𝑄 ∗ √𝑇𝐺𝑍
𝐴= 𝐴=
𝐹2 𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑐 √𝑃1 (𝑃1 − 𝑃2 ) 𝐶𝐾𝑑 𝑃1 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐
Table 3.2: Gas PSV sizing equations
Where,
2 𝑘+1/𝑘−1
𝐶 = 0.03948√𝑘 [ ] , refer to Figure 3.7
𝑘+1
𝑘 1−𝑟 (𝑘−1)/𝑘
𝐹2 = 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 = √[ ] 𝑟 2/𝑘 [ ], refer to Figure 3.6
𝑘−1 1−𝑟
r: ratio of backpressure to upstream relieving pressure P2/P1
Balanced Pressure Relief Valves
Balanced pressure relief valves should be sized using critical-flow equations. The back pressure correction factor
in this application accounts for subcritical flow velocities and the tendency for the disc to drop below full lift (the
use of subcritical flow equations is appropriate only where full lift is maintained). For this application, the back
pressure correction factor, Kb, should be obtained from the manufacturer.
Figure 3.1: Kb for balanced bellows relief valves (Gas) [1]
[1]
3.2 Steam PSV Sizing
Pressure relief devices in steam service that operate at critical
low conditions may be sized using:
190.5∗𝑊
𝐴= , where
𝑃1 𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑠ℎ 𝐾𝑁 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐

Kb: The capacity correction factor is due to backpressure.


Applied for balanced bellows valves only. Refer to Figure 1
For conventional valves, use a value for Kb equals 1.0.
KN: correction factor for Napier equation
= (0.1906 * P1- 1000)/(0.2292 *P1 - 1061)
where P1 in kPa and 10339 kPa < P1 ≤ 22057 kPa
KSH: Correction factor for superheated steam.
For saturated steam use KSH =1.0
3.3 Liquid PSV Sizing [1]
Pressure relief devices for liquid services may be sized using:
11.78 ∗ 𝑄 ∗ √𝐺
𝐴=
𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑤 𝐾𝑣 𝐾𝑐 𝐾𝑝 √𝑃1 − 𝑃2

Kd: effective coefficient of discharge that should be obtained from the valve manufacturer. For preliminary sizing
estimation, a discharge coefficient of 0.65 can be used.
Kw: correction factor for back pressure. If the backpressure is atmospheric, Kw =1.0.
Balanced-bellow valves in backpressure service will require the correction factor obtained from
Figure 2 Conventional valves require no special correction.
Kv: correction factor for viscosity as determined from the following equation:
2.878 342.75 −1 170 −0.5
𝑘𝑣 = (0.9935 + + ) or 𝑘𝑣 = ( + 1)
𝑅𝑒0.5 𝑅𝑒1.5 𝑅𝑒
When a pressure relief valve is sized for viscous liquid service, it should first be sized as if it were for non-viscous
type application (i.e., Kv = 1.0) so that a preliminary required discharge area, A, can be obtained from the previous
equation. From API standard orifice sizes (Table 3.3 may be used for preliminary estimation), the next larger
orifice size should be used in determining the Reynolds number, Re, the following equation:

𝑄∗(18800∗𝐺)
𝑅𝑒 = ,
𝜇√𝐴

µ: Liquid viscosity is cP Q: flow rate in L/min


G: specific Gravity A: selected area mm2
After Reynold’s number, Re, is determined, the factor Kv is obtained, and Kv is then applied in the liquid sizing
equation to correct the preliminary required discharge area. If the corrected area exceeds the chosen standard
orifice area, the above calculations should be repeated using the next larger standard orifice size.

Table 3.3: Conventional and balanced-bellows valve selection table


Figure 3.2: Kw for kb for relief valves due to back pressure (liquid) [1] (API RP 526 and GPSA Section 3) [3]
Figure 3.3: Kv for relief valves due to viscosity (liquid) [1] Figure 3.4: Kb for conventional/pilot operated relief valves (Gas) [1]

Figure 3.5: KSH for steam at T&P[3]


Figure 3.6: F2 Values for Gas PSV Sizing (subcritical Flow)

Figure 3.7: C Values for Gas PSV Sizing (Critical Flow)


3.4 Calculating Equation Coefficients 2. Steam
1. Gas or Vapors KN Correction factor for Napier equation
Kb Capacity correction factor = 1.0 where P1≤ 106.5 kg/cm2a or 1339 kPa
Kb = a + b(Pb /(Pset+POP)) 3 (abs. pressures) = (0.1906 * P1- 1000)/(0.2292 *P1 - 1061)
(Conventional and pilot operated) [6] where P1 in kPa and
γ Range % a b 10339 kPa (106.5 kg/cm2a) < P1 ≤ 22057 kPa (226.1
1.1 66-90 1.3026 -1.137*10-6 kg/cm2A)
1.3 63-90 1.294 -1.1703*10-6
1.5 56-90 1.203 -1.143*10-6 KSH Superheat steam correction factor
1.7 51-90 1.148 -1.109*10-6 For saturated steam at any pressure, KSH = 1.0
Kb =1/( a + b(PB/Ps)3) (gauge pressures) KSH can be obtained from figure 3.5 or KSH tables published
in ref [1] P.86-90.
(Balanced bellows) [6]
Overpressure Range a b
3. Liquid
10 30-50 0.8707 4.724*10-6
Kw Correction factor due to back pressure
20 30-50 0.976 8.36*10-7
If the back pressure is atmospheric, Kw = 1.0. for
conventional and pilot-operated PSVs, kw =1. Otherwise.
Use Figure 3.2.

1. The curves above represent a compromise of the values


recommended [1]
Figure 3.6: C for by several
Critical relief
flow gas valve
Sizing manufacturers
equation and
used when the make of the valve or the critical flow
Kw = 1.1165-0.01*(PB/Ps) for (PB/Ps) > 17 [6]
pressure point for the vapor or gas is unknown. The curves
Kv viscosity correction factor
are for set pressures of 50 psig and above. They are limited
2.878 342.75 −1
to back pressure below critical flow pressure for a given set 𝑘𝑣 = (0.9935 + 0.5 + )
pressure. For set pressure below 50 psig or subcritical flow, 𝑅𝑒 𝑅𝑒1.5
170 −0.5
the manufacturer must be consulted for values of Kb. [1] 𝑘𝑣 = (1 + )
2. For 21% overpressure, Kb equals 1.0 up to PB/PS = 50%.[1] 𝑅𝑒
3. For pilot-operated PRVs, the valve lift is not affected by Or use Figure 3.3
backpressure. For compressible fluids at critical 1.Use the next larger orifice area to calculate Re
flow conditions, a backpressure correction factor of 1.0 2.Correct calculated A without Kv by dividing it with new Kv
should be used for pilot-operated PRVs.[1] Kd Effective coefficient of discharge for PSV
Alternatively, kb can be estimated for conventional and 0.65, when a PRV is installed with or without a rupture disk
pilot-operated Relief valves using Figure 3.4 (Subcritical in combination;
flow) [1] 0.62, when a PRV is not installed, and sizing is for a rupture
Kd Effective coefficient of discharge for PSV disk
0.975 when a PRV is installed with or without a rupture disk
in combination;
0.62 when a PRV is not installed and sizing is for a rupture
disk
Kc combination correction factor
1.0 when a rupture disk is not installed.
Figure 3.7: F2 for Subcritical gas equation [1]
0.9 when a rupture disk is installed with a pressure relief
valve and the combination does not have a published value.
Notes on PSV sizing
PSV sizing could be an iterative procedure or a two-step process
After estimating the relieving capacity, you may want to check its impact on the relief header's total back
pressure. The increased back pressure due to the calculated relieved capacity could impact your
calculated/initially estimated Kb, resulting in another iteration/step to calculate the corrected relieved capacity.
Refer to section 5.3.4.2 on ref [1]

Inlet piping
inlet piping pressure losses due to friction should not be higher than 3% of set pressure and calculated using the
maximum rated capacity of the pressure relief device [1][3]. Exceptions were mentioned in recommended reads[II]
When two or more pressure relief devices are placed on one connection, the inlet piping internal cross-sectional
area shall be at least equal to the combined inlet areas of the pressure relief devices connected to it
Selection Criteria of PSV
1. Conventional PSVs
2. The sum of the maximum variable superimposed back pressure plus the built-up back pressure is less than
10% of the set pressure.
3. Fouling or corrosive conditions are not expected.
2. Bellows Type PSVs
1. The sum of the variable superimposed back pressure plus built-up back pressure exceeds 10% of set
pressure.
2. Fouling or corrosive conditions are expected and protection cannot be afforded by using alternative
materials or devices.

Backpressure Limitations on Bellows Type PSVs


Total backpressure shall not reduce differential pressure across the PSV to a value limiting PSV relieving capacity
to less than design capacity. This corresponds to a total backpressure of approximately 50% of set pressure for
gas services.

3. Pilot Operated PSVs


1. Pilot-operated PSVs are recommended when maximum set point accuracy is required
2. Pilot-operated PSVs shall generally be limited to clean gas service.
3. Tanks designed to API STD 650, which may also require pressure relief devices, may be protected by pilot-
operated relief valves. Pilot-operated relief valves shall protect tanks designed to API STD 620.

More on the advantages and disadvantages of different PSV types can be found at recommended reads [II] [III]
4. Examining possible cases (Contingencies)
Estimating the required relief loads could be a grueling task that requires extensive heat and mass balance
calculations at relief conditions. It could be best to use simulation tools for this one. However, this section
aims to familiarize readers with the basis and variables needed for different scenarios. Moreover, manual
calculations could be an alternative option where minimum data are available for simulation in some cases.
All causes of overpressure, or contingencies, must be evaluated for each PSV installation in terms of the
pressures generated and the rates at which fluids must be relieved. Causes of overpressure in process
equipment can range from a single event to a complex combination of events. The basis for calculating a
valve size follows calculations of valid contingencies. The contingency that requires the largest effective area
dictates the size of the PSV.
More on “guidelines on estimating relief loads for different contingencies” can be found on recommended
reads [V][I][III]
Table 4.1: Guidelines on estimating relief loads for different contingencies [2]
Item Pressure Relief Device Pressure Relief Device
No. Condition (Liquid Relief) (Vapor Relief)*
1 Closed outlets on vessels Maximum liquid pump- Total incoming steam and vapor plus that
in rate generated therein at relieving conditions
2 Cooling water failure to condenser — Total vapor to condenser at relieving conditions
3 Top-tower reflux failure — Total incoming steam and vapor plus that
generated therein at relieving conditions less
vapor condensed by side-stream reflux
4 Side-stream reflux failure — Difference between vapor entering and leaving
section at relieving conditions
5 Lean oil failure to absorber — None, normally
6 Accumulation of noncondensables — Same effect in towers as found for Item 2; in
other vessels, same effect as found for Item 1
7 Entrance of highly volatile — For towers, usually not predictable
material: Water in hot oil or Light
hydrocarbons in hot oil
8 Overfilling storage or surge vessel Maximum liquid —
Pump-in rate
9 Failure of automatic controls — Must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis
10 Abnormal heat or vapor input — Estimated maximum vapor generation including
non-condensables from overheating
11 Split exchanger tube — Steam or vapor entering from twice the cross-
sectional area of one tube; also same effects
found in Item 7 for exchangers
12 Internal Explosions — Not controlled by conventional relief devices
but by avoidance of circumstances
13 Chemical reaction — Estimated vapor generation from both normal
and uncontrolled conditions
14 Hydraulic expansion Use Liquid expansion —
1. Cold fluid shut in equation (table 4.7)
2. Line outside process area
3. Shut in
15 Exterior fire — Estimate by external fire equations (table 4.2)
16 Power failure (steam, electric, or — Study the installation to determine the effect of
other) power failure; size relief valve for the worst
condition that can occur
1. Fractionators — All pumps could be down, with the result that
reflux and cooling water would fail
2. Reactors — Consider failure of agitation or stirring, quench
or retarding steam; size valves for vapor
generation from a runaway reaction
3. Air-cooled exchangers — Fans would fail; size valves for the difference
between normal and emergency duty
4. Surge vessels Maximum liquid inlet —
rate
* Considerations may be given to the suppression of vapor production as the result of the device’s relieving
pressure being above operating pressure, assuming constant heat input. (Procedures for sizing pressure relief devices
are presented in Section 4 of API-RP-520.)
After the specifications are determined, the next activity is to calculate a preliminary effective discharge area.
Figure 4.1 shows the inputs used to determine the basis for calculating the size of a PSV.

Figure 4.1: Sizing input flowchart [2]


Relief Loads Estimation for individual contingencies

External Fire External Fire


Overpressure due to vaporization [4] Overpressure due to Gas Expansion [4]
𝑄 When the vessels that contain no liquid, such
𝑊 =
∆𝐻 as gas holders, are exposed to the fire
W: relieving load kg/hr contingency, overpressure will occur due to the
△H: Enthalpy difference between normal and relieving gas expansion. The following equation can
conditions Kcal/kg obtain the relieving loads for this case:
Q: total heat absorbed kcal/hr
NOTE: assuming to inlet or outlet flow
𝑄 = 𝑞𝑜 . 𝐹. 𝐴0.82 𝐴 (𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇1 )1.25
Q: total heat absorbed kcal/hr 𝑊 = 0.1406√𝑀𝑃1 ( )
𝑇11.1506
F: Environmental factor W: relieving load lb/hr
A: wetted surface m2 M: molecular weight
qo: 37130, P1: relieving pressure psia
if drainage isn’t provided qo: 61000 A: exposed surface area ft2
Bare Vessel Tω: Vessel max. wall temperature, 593 for CS
F=1 (oR)
Insulated Vessel T1: relieving temperature (oR)
𝑘 ∗ (𝑎 − 𝑇) T ∗P
𝐹= T1 = n 1⁄P
𝐶. 𝑡 n
k: thermal conductivity of insulation ( W/m-K) at average of Pn: normal operating pressure (psia)
904 oC and relieving temperature. Tn: normal operating temperature (oR)
Tf: temperature of vessel contents at relieving condition ( oC)
a: temperature of insulation outer surface (904 oC)
C: constant that equals 66570
t: thickness of insulation (m)
Type of equipment Factor F Factor F
API RP521 NFPA 30
Bare Vessel 1.0 1.0

Water application 1.0 0.3


facilities on bare vessel
Water application 1.0 0.15
facilities on insulated
vessel
Depressurizing and 1.0 -
emptying facilities
Underground storage 0.0 0.3
Earth covered storage 0.03 -
above grade

Table 4.2: Relief loads guidelines for External Fire


Closed Outlet
Drums / flashing drum with reboiler [4] Columns [4]
The vapor rate in the feed gas is treated as the relief When all outlets from the equipment are blocked, the
valve's relieving rate. The relief rate is determined by relieving load should be at least as great as the capacity
estimating the emergency reboiler heat duty. of the sources of pressure. If all outlets are not blocked,
See Vaporizer notes on table 4.5 the capacity of the unblocked outlets may properly be
considered

Reboiler Duty (steam) (1) Valve block of reflux line


1
𝑊= [(ℎ𝐹′ − ℎ𝐿 )𝑊𝐹′ − (ℎ𝐷

− ℎ𝐿 )𝑊𝐷′ − (ℎ𝐵′ − ℎ𝐿 )𝑊𝐵′
𝜆
+ ∆𝑄𝑅′ − ∆𝑄𝐶′ ]
λ /hL: latent heat of vaporization/Liquid enthalpy at the
top section of the tower (2 or 3 stages below the top tray)
h’F: feed stream enthalpy (relieving)
W’F: Feed stream flow rate (relieving)
h’D/ W’D: Top distillate enthalpy and flow rate (relieving)
h’B/ W’B: Bottom product enthalpy and flow rate
(relieving)
𝑡2′ − 𝑡1′
∆𝑇′ = △Q’R: Reboiler duty (relieving)
𝑇 ′ − 𝑡1′ △Q’C: Condenser duty (relieving)
ln( ′ )
𝑇 − 𝑡2′
∆𝑇′ 𝑈
∆𝑄′ = ( )( 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐 )∆𝑄 (kcal/hr)
∆𝑇 𝑈𝐷
∆𝑄′
𝑊= (kg/hr)
𝜆
Reboiler Duty (Oil) (2) Valve block of fractionation column overhead vapor
product
1
𝑊= [(ℎ𝐹′ − ℎ𝐿 )𝑊𝐹′ − (ℎ𝐵′ − ℎ𝐿 )𝑊𝐵′ + ∆𝑄𝑅′ ]
𝜆
Steam stripping is used:
1
𝑊𝐻𝐶 = [(ℎ𝐹′ − ℎ𝐿 )𝑊𝐹′ − (ℎ𝑠′ − ℎ𝑠′′ )𝑊𝑠′
𝜆
− (ℎ𝐵′ − ℎ𝐿 )𝑊𝐵′ ]
𝑊 = 𝑊𝐻𝐶 + 𝑊𝑠′
WHC: hydrocarbon relieved
W’s: steam relieved
(𝑇1 ′ − 𝑡2′ ) − (𝑇2 ′ − 𝑡1′ ) h’s: steam inlet enthalpy (relieving)
∆𝑇′ =
𝑇 ′ − 𝑡2′ h’’s: steam relieving enthalpy
ln( 1 ′ )
𝑇2 − 𝑡1′ estimate relieved steam based on a full open steam
∆𝑇′ 𝑈
∆𝑄′ = ( )( 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐 )∆𝑄 (kcal/hr) control valve and pressure difference between the steam
∆𝑇 𝑈𝐷
𝑇1 −𝑇2′ header and relieving pressure

∆𝑄 = ( )∆𝑄 (kcal/hr)
𝑇1 −𝑇2
∆𝑄′
𝑊= (kg/hr)
𝜆

Table 4.3: Relief loads guidelines for Drums and Columns


Discharge line of rotary machinery
Centrifugal pumps[4] Centrifugal compressors[4]

An overpressure problem does not occur on If the design pressure for the compressor discharge system is
the discharge line of a centrifugal pump higher than the pressure of surge point at maximum speed,
because the centrifugal pump discharge overpressure does not occur. If the design pressure is lower
system normally has a design pressure equal than that, overpressure protection should be considered. In
to or higher than the pump shut-off this case, the relieving load should be the flow rate (FD) at the
pressure. head equivalent to the design pressure (PD) at maximum
However, when the design pressure is set speed or should be the anti-surge flow (FS) at maximum
lower than the pump shut-off pressure, an speed, whichever is greater. That value is usually obtained
overpressure problem will occur, and the from such compressor performance curve as shown below:
flow rate at the head, equivalent to the set
pressure of the PSV minus the maximum
suction pressure, should be read from the
pump performance curve for the relieving
load.
The relieving load should be determined
based on the pump’s maximum speed when
the steam turbine driver is provided.

Reciprocating pumps[4] The calculation procedure is as follows.


The relieving load shall be equal to the 1. Assume the discharge pressure is 1.1 times the design
pump’s rated capacity. pressure. Based on the calculated discharge pressure,
estimate the suction pressure of the compressor assuming
the compressor is running on the surge control line. In
case of variable speed compressor, whole range of the
operating speed to be investigated.
2. Calculate weight flow through the compressor and
required power of the compressor based on the suction
and discharge pressures calculated in Step 1.
3. Check the calculated weight flow if it is available from
upstream side of the compressor.
4. Check the required power if it is available from the driver.
Reciprocating compressors[4] Relieving load is the maximum weight flow rate calculated in
The relieving load should be equal to the Step 2 considering the limitation of available flow rate and
compressor’s rated capacity. power checked in Step 3 and 4. In case the calculated suction
pressure is equal to or higher than the design pressure of the
suction side in Step 1, re-calculate the suction pressure
assuming that the compressor is still running on the surge
control line while the 1.1 times of the design
pressure is replaced with the design pressure of discharge
side.

Table 4.5: Relief loads guidelines for Rotary Machinery


Heat Exchangers
Vaporization in Hex [4] Vaporizer [4]

If the vapor pressure of the cold medium at the When the outlet of the cold side is blocked off, and the hot
inlet temperature of hot side is more than 1.3 medium continues to flow, overpressure will
times the design pressure of the cold side, occur, and the relieving load should be calculated based on the
overpressure protection due to vaporization is vaporizer heat duty at the relieving condition obtained by the
needed. If it is assumed that the outlet of the cold procedure shown in Table 4.3
side is blocked off, and the hot medium continues
to flow, the relieving load on the cold side should
be determined as follows :

𝑄 (𝑇1 − 𝑡𝑏𝑝 )
𝑊 = .
𝜆 (𝑇1 − 𝑡𝑎𝑣 ) Steam Vaporizer
𝑡1 + 𝑡2 (1) Inlet and outlet temperatures of process fluid to/from
𝑡𝑎𝑣 =
2 reboiler at relieving pressure will increase, because
W : relieving load (kg/hr) the boiling temperature of process fluid increases, when the
Q : normal heat exchanger duty (kcal/hr) operating pressure reaches the relieving pressure.
λ : latent heat of vaporization at tbp (kcal/kg) (2) When heating steam is supplied under steam flow control,
T1: hot side inlet temperature (oC) the saturated temperature of steam at the
Tbp: cold side inlet temperature (oC) pressure of supply header should be applied to ΔT calculation,
tav: average cold side temperature (normal because the flow control valve tend to open to maintain the
operation) (oC) steam flow at a constant. If the other control system is applied
t1/t2: cold side inlet/outlet temperature (oC) to the steam supply, the normal operating temperature of
steam may be used.
(3) Ucalc (calculated overall heat transfer coefficient ) should be
used for recalculation.

Hot Oil Vaporizer


When the hot oil supply stops due to failures such as a hot oil
pump stop, overpressure does not occur because
of no heat input to the reboiler. If the hot oil supply continues,
the heat duty should be calculated based on the temperature
profile under the relieving conditions.
(1) Inlet and outlet temperatures of process fluid to/from the
reboiler will increase because the boiling temperature of
process fluid increases when the operating pressure reaches
the relieving pressure.
(2) The flow rate of hot oil is maintained the same as in normal
operation.
(3) UCALC (calculated overall heat transfer coefficient) should be
used for recalculation.
Based on the above conditions, assume the outlet temperature
of hot oil (T2’) and obtain the reboiler duty
(ΔQ’) by trial and error calculation using the following
equations :

Table 4.6: Relief loads guidelines for Heat Exchangers


Liquid Thermal Expansion [4] Solar Radiation [4]

A 3/4-inch × 1-inch nominal pipe size (NPS) relief valve 𝑄 = 𝑞𝑠 𝜀𝐴


is commonly used, even though it will be oversized, Q: heat absorbed by solar radiation (kcal/hr)
since relieving load for thermal expansion will usually qs : heat flux by solar radiation (kcal/hr.m2)
be small. ԑ : emissivity
If there is reason to believe that this size is not A: projected heat transfer area (m2)
adequate, the relieving load should be obtained
according to the following equation
𝛼𝑄 solar radiation
𝑉=
𝐶 ∗ 𝑆. 𝐺 ∗ 𝐶𝑝 When the solar radiation data is not available, the noon values in
V: volumetric flow rate at flowing temperature (m3lhr) the following table can be applied to obtain the maximum heat
𝛼:cubical expansion coefficient (1/°K) absorbed from solar radiation.
Q: total heat transfer rate. ( kW) Maximum Expected Solar Radiation of Various North Latitudes
specific gravity, water = 1.0 (-) Latitude (kcal/h.m2) (kW/m2)
Cp specific heat of the fluid 24-hr N30° 353 0.41
C: factor (1000) average
N40° 353 0.41
N45° 353 0.41
Noon N30° 990 1.15
value
N35° 976 1.14
N40° 950 1.1
N45° 922 1.07
Above table presents typical highest values of monthly average
solar radiation on a horizontal surface throughout the year,
based on analysis of Weather Bureau records for a number of
stations through the United States. Refer to Section 12 Table 12-5
of Perry’s Chemical Engineer’’ Handbook 7th Edition.
Gravity of Oil [Deg API] αv 1/°C or 1/K (1/°F) typical value of emissivity
3 – 34.9 0.00072 (0.0004) Material Emissivity, ε
35 – 50.9 0.00090 (0.0005) Clean and polished metal 0.1
51 – 63.9 0.00108 (0.0006) Metals, general 0.3
64 – 78.9 0.00126 (0.0007) Rusty metal 0.8
79 – 88.9 0.00144 (0.0008) Painted surface 0.95
89 – 93.9 0.00153 (0.00085)
94 and lighter 0.00162 (0.0009)
Temperature °C αv 1/°C or 1/K For horizontal piping or vessels, vertical projected area on ground
(water) is used. For vertical piping or vessels, horizontal projected area
15.6 0.00018 may be used as conservative side.
20 0.00021
30 0.00030
40 0.00040
50 0.00047

Table 4.7: Relief loads guidelines for Liquid Thermal Expansion and Solar radiation
Inadvertent Control Valve Opening
Flashing Liquid [4]

(a) Calculate ΔP of the control valve at the relieving condition


(b) Breakthrough flow rate should be calculated on a liquid phase basis by using the selected CV value,
since LPG is in liquid phase at the inlet of the control valve.
(c) Calculate the flashed vapor flow rate (VF) by the flash calculation at the relieving pressure.
(d) If the vapor space is enough to accommodate the let down liquid for the operator’s response time, the
relieving load (VR) = VF – VN ( VN = vapor flow rate at normal operation).
(e) If the vapor space is not enough, consider the relieving of vapor-liquid mixture.
(f) In this case, pay attention to an occurrence of slug flow in two phase lines.
Gas Breakthrough [4]

(a) Calculate ΔP of the control valve at the relieving condition.


(b) Gas breakthrough flow rate (VB) should be calculated by using the selected CV value.
(c) Relieving load (VR) = VB – VN , ( VN = vapor flow rate at normal operation).
(d) In this case, pay attention to an occurrence of slug flow in two phase lines.
Liquid [Note 1] [7]
Estimation of control valve Cv[Note 2][7]
△𝑃
𝑄𝐿 = 0.86 ∗ 𝐶𝑣 . √ 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒 𝐶𝑣 1 Single-seated
𝐺 𝑑 (𝑖𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑠) = ( )2
9 valves
QL in m3 /hr
△P in kg/cm2
G: Specific gravity (-)
Steam [7]
△ 𝑃. 𝑃2 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒 𝐶𝑣 1 Double-seated
𝑄𝑠 = 394.155 ∗ 𝐶𝑣 . √ 𝑑 (𝑖𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑠) = ( )2
𝑇 12 valves
Qs in kg/hr
△P and P2 in kg/cm2
T in oK
Gas [Note 1][7]
△ 𝑃. 𝑃2
𝑄𝐺 = 386.67 ∗ 𝐶𝑣 √ 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒 𝐶𝑣 1
𝑍2 . 𝐺. 𝑇 Butterfly valve
𝑑 (𝑖𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑠) = ( )2
3 20 sizes
Qs in Nm /hr
△P and P2 in kg/cm2
T in oK
G is the molecular weight divided by 29
Table 4.8: Relief loads guidelines for Inadvertent open control valve

NOTE 1: Assuming a subcritical and turbulent flow

NOTE 2: Shortcut mentioned in ref [8] were used in the tool (Cv =10*d2), d in inches
Wetted Area Calculations [5]
To determine vaporization rate, the surface
area wetted by a vessel's internal liquid and is Semi-Ellipsoidal/Elliptical Heads
up to 7.6 m (25 feet) above grade, denoted as Or Torispherical/Dished Heads
"fire elevation", needs to be considered. The
term "grade" usually refers to ground level,
but may be at any level at which a sizable fire
could be sustained.
z
D
Vessels
Cylindrical part
h
Vertical
𝐴𝑤
𝐷2 ℎ
= 𝜋 (( − 0.5) 𝐵 + 1
8 𝐷

L 1 4𝜀 ( − 0.5) + 𝐵
+ ln( 𝐷 ))
D 4𝜀 2 − √3

2


𝐵 = 1 + 12 ( − 0.5)
𝐷

Aw = 2πD*L For 2:1 Elliptical head ε = 0.866,


Horizontal elsewise:

4𝑧 2
𝜀 = √1 −
𝐷2
D
z: inside dish depth
h
𝜀 : Eccentricity of elliptical heads
L
𝐴𝑤 = 𝐿𝐷 cos −1 (1 − (2ℎ/𝐷))
Heads
Hemispherical Heads

𝐷
𝐴𝑤 = 𝜋ℎ
2
Shortcut Calculations for various wetted Areas [4]

Figure 4.2: Heat exchanger U tube side Aw

Figure 4.3: Fixed Heat exchanger tube side Aw

Figure 4.4: Kettle reboiler Aw

Figure 4.5: Floating head Hex. Aw

Figure 4.6: Heat exchanger U shell-side Aw


Figure 4.7: Fixed heat exchanger Shell-side Aw

Figure 4.8: Spherical Tank Aw

Figure 4.9: Vertical vessel fixed head Aw


Figure 4.10: Vertical Vessel Elliptical Head Aw

Figure 4.11: Horizontal Vessel Aw

Figure 4.12: Trayed Column Aw


Examples
API RP 520 Example No. 1
Input Units API RP 520 Part I Tool
Mass flow Kg/hr 24270 24271
Molecular weight - 51 51 (Using composition)
o
Relieving Temperature K 348 74.85 oC
Design pressure of equipment kPa / kg/cm2 517 5.272
Backpressure kPa / kg/cm2 101.325 1.033
Overpressure % 10 10 (Calculated)

Output
Relieving pressure kPa / kg/cm2 670
Z - 0.9 0.98
Critical Pressure kPa / kg/cm2 392 -
Cp/Cv - 1.11 1.05
Kb - 1 1
Kc - 1 1
kd - 0.975 0.975
Acalculated cm2/ in2 36.98 / 5.73 39.5 / 6.12
Aselected cm2/ in2 41.16 / 6.38 41.16 / 6.38
Orifice Designation P P
1. Estimating Relief Pressure and constants

Relief pressure for one relief valve, no rupture disc, and non-fire case will equal 1.1 the equipment
design pressure
Pr = 1.1 * 517 = 670 kPa (6.8321 kg/cm2)
Kb = 1 as backpressure is atmospheric
Kc = 1, as there’s no rupture disc installed
Kd = 0.975
1. Checking whether the flow is critical

2 𝑘⁄(𝑘−1) 2 1.11⁄(1.11−1)
𝑃𝐶𝑓 = 𝑃1 ∗ [ ] = 670 ∗ [ ] = 670 ∗ 0.5825 = 390.33
𝑘+1 1.11 + 1
The PRV sizing is based on the critical flow equation since the backpressure (0 kPag) is less than the
critical flow pressure (291 kPag).

2. Calculating Orifice Area

2 (𝑘+1)/(𝑘−1) 2 (1.11+1)/(1.11−1)
𝐶 = 0.03948√𝑘 [ ] =0.03948*√1.11 [ ] = 0.03948 ∗ 0.63045 =
𝑘+1 1.11+1
0.02489

Using The C graph provided earlier (Figure 2.7), C = 0.0249 for Cp/Cv of 1.11
𝑊 ∗ √𝑇𝑍 24270 348 ∗ 0.9
𝐴= = √ = 3698 𝑚𝑚2
𝐶𝐾𝑑 𝑃1 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐 √𝑀 0.0249 ∗ 0.975 ∗ 1 ∗ 1 ∗ 670 51

See API 526 for the selection of the proper orifice size. API 526 provides standard effective
orifice areas in terms of letter designations. For this example, a “P” size orifice should be selected since it
has an effective orifice area of 6.38 in.2 (4116 mm2)
Step 1: Calculate Relief Pressure Step 2: Input mass flow rate and composition

Step 3: Input relief/back conditions (T&P) Step 4: Download your calculations table!
API RP 520 Example No. 4
Input Units API RP 520 Part I Tool
Mass flow Kg/hr 69615 69615
Relieving Temperature C 427 427
Design pressure of equipment kPag / kg/cm2g 11032 112.5
Backpressure kPag / kg/cm2g 101.325 1.033
Overpressure % 10 10

Output
Relieving pressure kPa / kg/cm2 12236 (124.77) 124.77
Kb - 1 1
Kc - 1 1
kd - 0.975 0.975
KN - 1.01 1.01
KSH - 0.855 0.862
Acalculated cm2/ in2 12.87 / 1.995 12.75 / 1.97
Aselected cm2/ in2 18.41 / 2.853 18.41 / 2.853
Orifice Designation L L
1. Estimating Relief Pressure and constants

Relief pressure for one relief valve, no rupture disc, and non-fire case will equal 1.1 the equipment
design pressure
Pr = 1.1 * 11032 + 101.325 = 12236.5 kPa (124.77 kg/cm2)
Kb = 1 for conventional valve discharging to atmosphere
Kc = 1, as there’s no rupture disc installed
Kd = 0.975
KSH : 0.855 from tables
KN : P1 (124.77 kg/cm2.a) is > 106.5 kg/cm2.a
KN = (0.1906 *1774.7 - 1000)/(0.2292 *1774.7- 1061) = 1.01

2. Calculating Orifice Area


190.5 ∗ 𝑊 190.5 ∗ 69615
𝐴= = = 1287 𝑚𝑚2 (12.87 𝑐𝑚2 )
𝑃1 𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑠ℎ 𝐾𝑁 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐 12236.5 ∗ 0.975 ∗ 0.855 ∗ 1.01 ∗ 1 ∗ 1
See API 526 for the selection of the proper orifice size. API 526 provides standard effective

orifice areas in terms of letter designations. For this example, a “L” size orifice should be selected since it

has an effective orifice area of 2.853 in.2 (1841 mm2)


Step 1: Calculate Relief Pressure Step 2: Input mass flow rate and composition

Step 3: Input relief/back conditions (T&P) Step 4: Download your calculations table!
API RP 520 Example No. 5
Input Units API RP 520 Part I Tool
Mass flow L/min 6814 368010 (kg/hr)
Specific Gravity 0.9 0.9
Viscosity Saybolt / cP 2000 / 388.5 388.5
Design pressure of equipment kPag / kg/cm2g 1724 17.58
Backpressure kPag / kg/cm2g 345 3.52 (4.55 abs)
Overpressure % 10 10
Output
Relieving pressure kPag / kg/cm2 1896 (19.33 kg/cm2.g) 20.37 (19.337 gauge)
Kc - 1.0 1
Kd - 0.65 0.65
Kw - 1 0.97
Kv - 1 (initially) / 0.982 0.99
Acalculated cm2/ in2 31.22 / 4.84 30.71 / 4.83
Aselected cm2/ in2 41.16 / 6.38 41.16 / 6.38
Orifice Designation P P
1. Estimating Relief Pressure and constants

Relief pressure for one relief valve, no rupture disc, and non-fire case will equal 1.1 the equipment
design pressure
Pr = 1.1 * 1724 = 1896.4 kPa (kg/cm2)
Kw = 1 as backpressure is atmospheric
Kc = 1 as there’s no rupture disc installed
Kd= 0.975
Kv: initially assumed 1
2. Calculating Orifice Area

11.78𝑄√𝐺 11.78 ∗ 6814 0.9


𝐴= = √ = 3066 𝑚𝑚2 (30.66 𝑐𝑚2 )
𝐾𝑑 𝐾𝑤 𝐾𝑣 𝐾𝑐 √𝑃1 − 𝑃2 0.975 ∗ 1 ∗ 1 ∗ 1 1896 − 345

See API 526 for the selection of the proper orifice size. API 526 provides standard effective
orifice areas in terms of letter designations. For this example, a “P” size orifice should be selected since it
has an effective orifice area of 6.38 in.2 (4116 mm2)
3. Check Kv and recalculate Acalculated
𝑄 ∗ (18800 ∗ 𝐺) 6814*18800*0.9
𝑅𝑒 = = = 4625
𝜇√𝐴 388.5√4116
−0.5
170
𝑘𝑣 = ( + 1) = 0.982
𝑅𝑒
𝐴𝑅 3066
𝐴= = = 3122 𝑚𝑚2
𝐾𝑣 0.982
Step 1: Calculate Relief Pressure Step 2: Input mass flow rate and composition

Step 3: Input relief/back conditions (T&P) Step 4: Download your calculations table!
Fire Case Example: Benzene in a Horizontal Vessel
Input Units Reference [1] Tool
Units Converted
Fluid Benzene Benzene
Molecular weight - 78.11 78.11
Relieving Temperature K 37.78 + 273.15 [Note] 250 + 273.15 [Note 2]
Design pressure of equipment kPag / kg/cm2.g 1379 14.06 kg/cm2.g (1379 kPa)
Backpressure kPa / kg/cm2 Atmospheric Atmospheric
Overpressure % 21 21
Vessel Geometry data Bare Vessel Bare Vessel
Horizontal + Horizontal +
spherical heads Cylindrical heads
Diameter m 4.572 4.572
T-T Length m 9.144 9.144
Level (Normal liquid level) m 3.734 3.734
Height above grade m 4.572 4.572

Output
Relieving pressure kPa / kg/cm2 1769.88 18.04 kg/cm2.g (1769.7 kPa)
ΔH kCal/kg 95.62(input) 146 [Note 1]
Wetted Area (Aw) m2 83.7 121
Mass flow Kg/hr 14665 13020.15
Z - 1 (input) 0.81
Critical Pressure kPa / kg/cm2
Flow condition - Critical Critical
Cp/Cv - 1.12 (input) 0.97
Kb - 1 1
Kc - 1 1
kd - 0.975 0.975
C
Acalculated cm2/ in2 6.787 / 1.052 in2 8.20495 / 1.27177 in2
Aselected cm2/ in2 8.303 / 1.287 in2 8.303 / 1.287 in2
Orifice Designation J (nozzles 2”/3”) J (nozzles 2”/3”)
Notes:

1. Heat of vaporization is higher in the tool as a result of adding the heat required to bring the fluid
from the subcooled phase to saturation temperature
2. A temperature of 250 was assumed to obtain benzene at the vapor phase; assuming relived and
vaporized benzene at 37.78 C & 18 kg/cm2 is illogical. This, however, will increase Acalculaed.
3. Estimate Vessel wetted area

Level of the wetted area = 7.6 – 4.57 = 3.03 m

ratio of level = 3.03/4.57 = 0.663

Total Area of the horizontal vessel (spherical heads)

= (L+D)*πD = (9.1 + 4.57)*π*4.57 = 196.26 m2 9.1 m

Fraction of area (from Figure 4.11) = 0.6


4.57 m
Wetted area = Area fraction * total surface area
7.6 – 4.57

= 0.6*196.26 = 117.75 m2 Wetted Area


4.57 m 3.73+4.57 m 7.6 m

2ℎ
𝐴𝑤 (𝐶𝑦𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡) = 𝐿𝐷 cos −1 (1 − ( ))
𝐷
3.03
= 9.1 ∗ 4.57 𝑐𝑜𝑠 −1 (1 − (2 ∗ )) = 587 ∗ cos −1 (−0.326) = 79.14 𝑚2
4.57
𝐴𝑤 (2 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑠) = 𝜋ℎ𝐷 = 3.14 ∗ 3.03 ∗ 4.057 = 38.6 𝑚2
𝐴𝑤 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 79.147 + 38.6 = 117.74 𝑚2
4. Estimate Relief Load

Q = qoFA0.82

F = 1 for Bare vessel

qo = 37130 (adequate drainage is provided)

Q = 37130*1*117.750.82 = 1853159.92 kCal/hr


𝑄 1853159.92
𝑊= = = 12693 𝑘𝑔/ℎ𝑟
∆𝐻 146
3. Estimating Relief Pressure and constants

Relief pressure for one relief valve, no rupture disc, and fire case will equal 1.21 the equipment design
pressure
Pr = 1.21 * 1379 + 101.325 = 1770 kPa (18.05 kg/cm2)
Kb = 1 as backpressure is atmospheric
Kc = 1, as there’s no rupture disc installed
Kd = 0.975
4. Checking whether the flow is critical

2 𝑘⁄(𝑘−1) 2 1.12⁄(1.12−1)
𝑃𝐶𝑓 = 𝑃1 ∗ [ ] = 1770 ∗ [ ] = 1770 ∗ 0.5805 = 1027.5 𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑘+1 1.12 + 1
The PRV sizing is based on the critical flow equation since the backpressure (0 kPag) is less than the
critical flow pressure (1027 kPag).
5. Calculating Orifice Area

2 (𝑘+1)/(𝑘−1) 2 (1.12+1)/(1.12−1)
𝐶 = 0.03948√𝑘 [ ] =0.03948*√1.12 [ ] = 0.03948 ∗ 0.4 =
𝑘+1 1.12+1
0.0249

Using The C graph provided earlier (Figure 2.7), C = 0.025 for Cp/Cv of 1.12

𝑊 ∗ √𝑇𝑍 24270 348 ∗ 1


𝐴= = √ = 621 𝑚𝑚2
𝐶𝐾𝑑 𝑃1 𝐾𝑏 𝐾𝑐 √𝑀 0.025 ∗ 0.975 ∗ 1 ∗ 1 ∗ 1770 78.11

See API 526 for the selection of the proper orifice size. API 526 provides standard effective orifice areas
in terms of letter designations. For this example, a “J” size orifice should be selected since it has an
effective orifice area of 1.287 in.2 (830 mm2)
Step 1: Calculate Relief Pressure Step 2: Select estimate relief loads and choose “External Fire
due to vaporization”

Step 3: input relieved stream composition and conditions Step 4: Input wetted Area required inputs
Step 5: check your results and calculations’ matrix Step 6: go to “3. Gas or vapor” and use Calculated Relief Load

Step 7: Input mass flow rate and composition Step 8: Download your calculations table!

Note: 250 oC was used to obtain the vapor phase


Definitions
Maximum operating pressure is the expected maximum pressure during operation of the system
upstream of the pressure relief valve.

Maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) is the maximum gauge pressure permissible at the top of
a completed vessel in its operating position for a designated temperature. The pressure is based on
calculations for each element in a vessel using nominal thickness, exclusive of additional metal thickness
allowed for corrosion and loading other than pressure. The maximum allowable working pressure is the
basis for the pressure setting of the pressure relief devices that protect the vessel.

Design gauge pressure refers to at least the most severe conditions of coincident temperature and
pressure expected during operation. This pressure may be used in place of the maximum allowable
working pressure in all cases where the MAWP has not been established. The design pressure is equal to
or less than the MAWP.

Accumulation is the pressure increase over the maximum allowable working pressure of the vessel
during discharge through the pressure relief device, expressed in pressure units or as a percent.
Maximum allowable accumulations are established by applicable codes for operating and fire
contingencies.

Overpressure is the pressure increase over the set pressure of the pressure relief device, expressed in
pressure units or as a percent. It is the same as accumulation when the relieving device is set at the
maximum allowable working pressure of the vessel.

Rated relieving capacity is the portion of the measured relieving capacity permitted by the applicable
code regulation to be used as a basis for the application of a pressure relief device. Stamped capacity is
the rated relieving capacity that appears on the device nameplate.

The stamped capacity is based on the set pressure plus the allowable overpressure for compressible
fluids and the differential pressure for incompressible fluids. The stamped capacity shall not exceed 90%
of the average capacity of the valves tested.[ASME VIII Div. 1 UG-13 1 (d)(l)]

Set pressure is the inlet gauge pressure at which the pressure relief device is set to open under service
conditions.

Pressure differential is the difference between the set pressure of the pressure relief device and the
operating pressure of the protected vessel.

Cold differential test pressure is the pressure at which the pressure relief valve is adjusted to open on the
test stand. The cold differential test pressure includes corrections for the service conditions of back
pressure or temperature or both.

Back pressure is the pressure that exists at the outlet of pressure relief devices as a result of the pressure
in the discharge system. It is the sum of the superimposed and built-up back pressure.

Superimposed back pressure: The static back pressure that exists at the outlet of a pressure relief device
at the time the device is required to operate. It is result of pressure in the discharge system corning from
other sources and may be constant or variable. Built-up back pressure: The built-up back pressure is the
increase in pressure in the discharge header that develops as a result of flow after the pressure relief
device or devices open.

The built-up back pressure is caused by flow from the particular device and others, if any, which
simultaneously discharge into the disposal system. This type of back pressure is variable. The built-up
back pressure shall be less than the allowable back pressure, 10% of the set pressure for the
conventional type or 50% of the set pressure for the balanced-bellows type.

Constant Back Pressure: The static back pressure that exists under normal operation where no relief
device is operated; i.e. constant back pressure of the superimposed back pressure. The constant back
pressure is used to determine the spring set pressure of conventional type pressure relief valve as a
difference between the set pressure and the constant back pressure. Therefore, the opening pressure
will vary depend on the built-up back pressure. The opening pressure of balanced-bellows type is the set
pressure of the valve and is independent of any back pressure.

Blowdown is the difference between the set pressure and the closing pressure of a pressure relief valve,
expressed as a percent of the set pressure or in pressure units.

Opening pressures the value of increasing inlet static pressure at which there is a measurable lift of the
disc or at which discharge of the fluid becomes continuous.

Closing pressure is the value of decreasing inlet static pressure at which the valve disc reestablishes
contact with the seat or at which lift becomes zero.

Simmer is the audible or visible escape of compressible fluid between the seat and disc at an inlet static
pressure below the set pressure and at no measurable capacity

Leak-test pressure is the specified inlet static pressure at which a seat leak test is performed. The term
relieving conditions is used to indicate the inlet pressure and temperature on a pressure relief device at a
specific overpressure. The relieving pressure is equal to the valve set pressure plus the overpressure. The
temperature of the flowing fluid at relieving conditions may be higher or lower than the operating
temperature.

Chatter refers to the motion that causes the disc to contact the seat and damage the valve and
associated piping. Chattering may result in lowered capacity and damage to the seating surfaces.

Flutter refers to the abnormally rapid reciprocating motion of the movable parts of a pressure relief valve
in which the disc does not contact the seat

Atmospheric discharge is the release of vapors and gases from pressure relief or depressing devices to
the atmosphere.

Flare system is a means for the safe disposal of waste gasses by closed pipeline and combustion system.
With an elevated mre the combustion is carried out at the top of a pipe or stack where the burner and
igniter are located. A ground flare is similarly equipped except that combustion is carried out at or near
ground level. A burn pit differs from a flare in that it is normally designed to handle both liquids and
vapors.

Vent stack is the elevated vertical termination of a disposal system that discharges vapors into the
atmosphere without combustion or chemical conversion of the relieved fluid.
References
[1] API RP 520 Part I, 10th edition.
[2] Engineering Encyclopedia: Aramco desktop standards: sizing and selecting Pressure relief valves
[3] Pressure relief devices rev. 5, JGC standard practice 2002 JGS 210-120-1-61E
[4] Pressure Relieving design rev. 5, JGC standard practice 2008 JGS 210-120-1-40E
[5] Volume and Wetted Area of Partially Filled Horizontal Vessels, Link:
https://neutrium.net/equipment/volume-and-wetted-area-of-partially-filled-horizontal-vessels/
[6] Sizing Pressure-Relief Devices, Daniel A. Crowl and Scott A. Tipler. (AIChE)
[7] Elements of chemical process engineering chapter 1, Basic Process Engineering principles
[8] Chemical process engineering Vol. 1, Chapter 5 P. 246 By Kayode Coker

Other Recommended Reads


[I] EIEPD: PSV General Guideline: addresses the sizing procedures and guidelines, different relief
scenarios for relief load estimation, standards involved, and rupture disc types and sizing
procedures.
[II] The Safety Relief Valves Handbook by Marc Hellemans, Chapter 5: Design Fundamentals
[III] Applied Instrumentation in the Process Industries by W.G Andrew and H.B. Williams Vol 2, second
edition: Chapter 6: Pressure relief systems P. 130
[IV] API RP 520 Part II: Installation guidelines for PSVs.
[V] API 521: This standard specifies requirements and gives guidelines for examining the principal
causes of overpressure, determining individual relieving rates, and electing and designing disposal
systems, including such component parts as piping, vessels, flares, and vent stacks.

You might also like