Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Removal of Gutta-Percha From Root Canals Using An Nd:YAG Laser
Removal of Gutta-Percha From Root Canals Using An Nd:YAG Laser
Removal of Gutta-Percha From Root Canals Using An Nd:YAG Laser
Nd:YAG laser
670 International Endodontic Journal, 36, 670^673, 2003 ß 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Viducic̈ et al. Removal of gutta-percha using a laser
surface should be known before any laser treatment were irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl. The samples were ¢lled
within a root canal is attempted in vivo. with Diaket sealer (ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and gutta-
The removal of existing canal-¢lling material and percha using the cold lateral condensation technique.
orthograde retreatment is the procedure of choice before Access cavities were temporarily sealed with Cavit G
considering surgical treatment. Removal of gutta- (ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and stored in 0.9% saline solu-
percha (Kerr, Romulus, MI, USA) can be achieved by tion at 37 8C. After 7 days, the teeth were removed, air-
mechanical, thermal or chemical methods (Wourms dried and radiographed; ¢llings that were short or con-
et al. 1990). These procedures carry the risk of root per- tained voids were excluded from the study.
forations, fractured instrument or overheating. Chemi-
cal solvents can be used to dissolve gutta-percha,
Temperature measurement
although chloroform has been identi¢ed as a possible
carcinogen by the U.S. Public Health and Human Service The temperature was measured to the sensitivity of
(1985). The other solvents, such as xylene, are known to 0.1 8C (MD 3150, Beckmann-Eagle GmbH, Kernen,
be toxic or have an unpleasant odour. In addition, euca- Germany). The measurements were performed using
lyptol oil has to be heated in order to increase its e¡ective- two thermoprobes that were attached to the middle third
ness in dissolving gutta-percha (Wourms et al. 1990). of the external root surface on opposite sides. The probes
The aim of this study was to examine the use of an were held in position with a Styrofoam holder.The initial
Nd:YAG laser in removing gutta-percha and sealer root temperature was19 0.5 8C. After the temperature rise
¢llings without solvent or with eucalyptol or dimethyl- reached 4 8C, the lasing was stopped and the tempera-
formamide (DMF) (KemiG, Zagreb, Croatia) as solvents. ture was monitored until its maximum level.This highest
temperature on the root surface was recorded.
ß 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd International Endodontic Journal, 36, 670^673, 2003 671
Removal of gutta-percha using a laser Viducic̈ et al.
stop). The total number of laser pulses was recorded for all the groups for the amounts of pulses were statistically
each tooth. No instrument was used inside the root canal signi¢cant. The results are summarized in Table 1.
except the laser ¢bre. The gutta-percha remnants on
the optical ¢bre were constantly removed to eliminate
Discussion
the possibility of in£uencing the lasing parameters. Dur-
ing the experiment, it became apparent that lasing Laser devices with di¡erent wavelengths that could be
should be performed thrice to achieve length. After the absorbed in di¡erent tissues and materials seem promis-
last lasing, a size 35 reamer (Maillefer, Ballaigues, ing for removing gutta-percha and sealer. The heating
Switzerland) was used to check the working length. e¡ect of the laser beam is largely responsible for achiev-
The specimens were grooved longitudinally with a ing this goal. In the case of the Nd:YAG laser, the absorp-
diamond bur with water cooling and split with rongeurs, tion of energy in pigments could contribute to removal
placed on a graduated paper, examined under binocular of gutta-percha and the sealer. In addition, the heating
loupe (magni¢cation 1.5), and photographed using a of chemical solvents may be advantageous, as they are
camera (SZx12, Olympus Optical Co., Japan) connected more e¡ective at higher temperature (Wourms et al.
to the PC (Portage 2010 Series,Toshiba, Neuss, Germany) 1990, Kaplowitz 1994).
for determination of the area of remaining gutta-percha Various root-canal procedures cause temperature
on root-canal walls. The area of remaining gutta-percha increases on the root surface: warm gutta-percha tech-
was measured with the aid of a computer program ISSA niques, postspace preparation and lasing inside the root
(VAMS, Zagreb, Croatia). The results were analysed sta- canal (Cohen et al. 1996). Although a de¢nite answer
tistically using Student's t-test (P < 0.05) for indepen- regarding the relation between the temperature changes
dent samples. and vitality of periodontal tissue has not been reported,
it is accepted that the temperature transmitted from
the root canal through the dentine and cementum to
Results
the periodontium causes enzyme denaturation, espe-
The average rise in temperature for group 1 (eucalyptol) cially of alkaline phosphatase. The root may then
was 9.17 0.56 8C; for group 2 (DMF), 9.56 0.28 8C; undergo external resorption. Eriksson et al. 1982) found
and for group 3 (only laser), 8.29 0.41 8C. The di¡er- that irreversible bone injury occurred at a temperature
ences in temperature rise were statistically signi¢cant of 53 8C. According to the study by Saunders (1990),
(P < 0.05) between all groups. The duration of the high- the temperature elevations dissipated more rapidly
est temperature recorded on the specimens was 2^3 s, in vivo than in vitro. She assumed this was caused by
after this time it began to fall to room temperature. the cooling e¡ect of the microvasculature of periodontal
The time for the complete treatment in group 1 was membrane. Although we assume that the increase seen
6.7 0.85 min; in group 2,7.05 0.79 min; and in group in this study in vitro was larger than the increase that
3, 6.45 0.49 min. The di¡erence was statistically sig- could be expected in clinical conditions, caution should
ni¢cant (P < 0.05) between group 2 (DMF) and group 3 be taken during laser procedure because temperature
(laser). increases in groups 1 and 2 including standard devia-
All teeth had residual gutta-percha on the root-canal tions, in some cases, exceeded 10 8C. We proposed that
walls. The area of remaining gutta-percha was the lar- even lower energy parameters and shorter periods of
gest for group 2 (DMF) (6.13 5.76%) and the smallest lasing should be used in clinical work for safety of the
for group 3 (laser) (4.69 4.03%), but the di¡erence periodontal tissue.
was not statistically signi¢cant. The number of pulses Chloroform has been used for dissolving gutta-percha
required per tooth was higher in group 1 (eucalyptol) in root canals. Several studies investigated the e¡ective-
(1085 91) than in group 2 (984 90) and in group 3 ness of various gutta-percha solvents (Ibarrola et al.
(laser) (944 111) (P < 0.05). The di¡erences between 1993, Wilcox 1995, Gorduysus et al. 1997). It seems that
672 International Endodontic Journal, 36, 670^673, 2003 ß 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Viducic̈ et al. Removal of gutta-percha using a laser
some of the new solvent agents introduced for this pur- Gorduysus MO,Tasman F,Tuncer S, Etikan I (1997) Solubilizing
pose gave better results when they were heated before e¤ciency of di¡erent gutta-percha solvents: a comparative
use (Wourms et al.1990).The results of this study showed study. Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry 39,
133^5.
that laser heating of eucalyptol and DMF inside the root
Harashima T, Takeda FH, Zhang C, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K
canal did not improve removal of gutta-percha.
(1998) E¡ect of argon laser irradiation on instrumented root
Complete removal of debris during retreatment is dif-
canal walls. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 14, 26^30.
¢cult to accomplish, and the results from this study are Ibarrola JL, Knowles KI, Ludlow MO (1993) Retrievability of
in agreement with previous ¢ndings (Zuolo et al. 1994, Therma¢l plastic cores using organic solvents. Journal of
Bramante & Betti 2000). The percentage of the remain- Endodontics 19, 417^8.
ing gutta-percha on the root-canal walls was smaller Ingle JI, Himel VT, Hawrish CE et al. (2002) Endodontic cavity
than that reported byWilcox (1995); however, they used preparation. In: Endodontics, 5th edn, pp. 405^571. London,
di¡erent solvents (chloroform and halothane). In the UK: BC Decker.
study reported by Friedman et al. (1993), the technique Kaplowitz GJ (1994) E¡ect of temperature on recti¢ed turpen-
of root-canal ¢lling in£uenced the amount of residual tine oil as a gutta-percha solvent. Journal of Endodontics
gutta-percha on dentine walls. Canals ¢lled with the lat- 20, 173.
Le Go¡ A, Dautel-Morazin A, Guigand M,VulcainJ-M, Bonnaure-
eral condensation technique had larger amounts of deb-
Mallet M (1999) An evaluation of the CO 2 laser for endodontic
ris in the apical region.
disinfection. Journal of Endodontics 25, 105^8.
Levy G (1992) Cleaning and shaping of root canal with a Nd:YAG
Conclusion laser beam: a comparative study. Journal of Endodontics 18,
123^7.
The Nd:YAG laser is capable of softening gutta-percha Moshonov J, Òrstavik D,Yamauchi S, Pettiette M,Trope M (1995)
in vitro, but the addition of solvents did not improve its Nd:YAG laser irradiation in root canal disinfection. Endodon-
removal. tics and Dental Traumatology 11, 220^4.
Ramsko«ld LO, Fong CD, Stro«mberg T (1997) Thermal e¡ects and
antibacterial properties of energy levels required to sterilize
References
stained root canals with an Nd:YAG laser. Journal of Endodon-
Anic̈ I, Tachibana H, Matsumoto K, Qi P (1996) Permeability, tics 23, 96^100.
morphologic and temperature changes of canal dentine walls Saunders EM (1990) In vivo ¢ndings associated with heat gener-
induced by Nd:YAG, CO 2 and argon laser. International Endo- ated during thermomechanical compaction of gutta-percha.
dontic Journal 29, 13^22. Part 1. Temperature levels at the external surface of the root.
Bramante CM, Betti LV (2000) E¤cacy of Quantec rotary instru- International EndodonticJournal 23, 263^7.
ments for gutta-percha removal. International Endodontic U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1985) Public
Journal 33, 463^7. Health Service Fourth Annual Report on Carcinogens. P B
Cohen BI, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL (1996) E¡ect of power set- 85-134663.
tings on temperature change at the root surface when using Wilcox LR (1995) Endodontic retreatment with halothane
a Holmium YAG laser in enlarging the root canal. Journal of versus chloroform solvent. Journal of Endodontics 21,
Endodontics 22, 596^9. 305^7.
Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T, Grane B, McQueen D (1982) Ther- Wourms DJ, Campbell AD, Hicks ML, Pelleu GB, Jr (1990)
mal injury to bone. A vital-microscopic description of heat Alternative solvents to chloroform for gutta-percha removal.
e¡ects. International Journal of Oral Surgery 11, 115^21. Journal of Endodontics 16, 224^6.
Friedman S, MoshonovJ,Trope M (1993) Residue of gutta-percha Zuolo ML, Imura N, Ferriera MOF (1994) Endodontic retreat-
and glass ionomer cement sealer following root canal retreat- ment of therma¢l or lateral condensation in post space pre-
ment. International Endodontic Journal 26, 169^72. pared teeth. Journal of Endodontics 20, 9^12.
ß 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd International Endodontic Journal, 36, 670^673, 2003 673