Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Point 1- using cell phone while driving are more dangerous than drunker than driving.

What do you thing? What are actually happen? What is risk? What i want to share to
you all is using cell phone while driving is most danger than drunker while driving. Why say
that right?
At Oklahoma City, they study about this using simulation, where by driving
while using cell phone is more dangerous. Researchers found that the drunk drivers were
more aggressive and followed closer than the cell phone using while driving.
Researchers also suggest that cell phones make drivers more sluggish in
perception and reaction. The study, published in the June 29 issue oI Human Factors: The
Journal oI the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Iound that drivers talking on cell phones,
either handheld or hands-Iree, are more likely to crash because they are distracted by conversation.
Using a driving simulator under Iour diIIerent conditions: with no distractions, using a handheld cell
phone, talking on a hands-Iree cell phone, and while intoxicated to the 0.08 percent blood-alcohol
level, 40 participants Iollowed a simulated pace car that braked intermittently.
Researchers Iound that the drivers on cell phones drove more slowly, braked more slowly and were
more likely to crash. In Iact, the three participants who collided into the pace car were chatting away.
None oI the drunken drivers crashed.
"This study does not mean people should start driving drunk," said co-author Frank Drews. "It means
that driving while talking on a cell phone is as bad as or maybe worse than driving drunk, which is
completely unacceptable and cannot be tolerated by society."
Preliminary results Irom the study were announced three years ago.

Kajian, yang disiarkan dalam isu Jun
29 Faktor Manusia: Jurnal Faktor Manusia danPersatuan Ergonomik, mendapati bah
awa pemandu yang bercakap di telefon bimbit,sama ada pegang tangan atau bebas
tangan, lebih cenderung untuk crash kerana merekadiganggu oleh perbualan.
Menggunakan simulator memandu di bawah empat keadaan yang
berbeza: tanpagangguan, menggunakan telefon bimbit pegang
tangan, bercakap di telefon bimbit bebas
tangan, dan manakala mabuk tahap 0,08 peratus alkohol darah, 40
peserta diikuti sebuah kereta kadar simulasi yang braked sebentar-sebentar .
Para penyelidik mendapati bahawa pemandu di telefon bimbit memandu lebih
perlahan,braked lebih perlahan dan lebih
cenderung kepada kemalangan. Malah, ketiga-
tigapeserta yang dilanggar kereta kadar berbual. Tiada seorang pun
daripada pemandumabuk yang terlibat dalam kemalangan.
"Kajian ini tidak bermakna rakyat perlu mula memandu dalam keadaan mabuk,"
katapenulis bersama Frank Drews. "a bermakna bahawa memandu pada masa
yang sama bercakap di telefon bimbit sebagai lapuk atau mungkin lebih teruk
daripada mabukmemandu, yang benar-benar tidak boleh
diterima dan tidak boleh diterima oleh masyarakat."
Keputusan awal dari kajian ini diumumkan tiga tahun lalu.

The study, published in the June 29 issue of Human Factors: The Journal of the Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society, found that drivers talking on cell phones, either handheld
or hands-free, are more likely to crash because they are distracted by conversation.
Using a driving simulator under four different conditions: with no distractions, using a
handheld cell phone, talking on a hands-free cell phone, and while intoxicated to the 0.08
percent blood-alcohol level, 40 participants followed a simulated pace car that braked
intermittently.
Researchers found that the drivers on cell phones drove more slowly, braked more slowly
and were more likely to crash. n fact, the three participants who collided into the pace car
were chatting away. None of the drunken drivers crashed.
"This study does not mean people should start driving drunk," said co-author Frank Drews.
"t means that driving while talking on a cell phone is as bad as or maybe worse than driving
drunk, which is completely unacceptable and cannot be tolerated by society."
Preliminary results from the study were announced three years ago.

You might also like