Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 10 Adverbs
Chapter 10 Adverbs
10.1 Introduction
Adverbs in Zauzou are not morphologically marked. This class of words is a functional
category that serves to modify either adjectival or verbal predicates. In addition to several closed
classes of canonical adverb categories, some adverbial expressions can also take the forms of
adjectives, Wh-words, and even post-verbal adverbials that have properties of verbs. Zauzou has
a grammaticalized syntactic position for adverbs, which is the preverbal position. Closed classes
of adverbs presented in this chapter involving degree adverbs, frequency adverbs, interrogative
adverbs and the negative adverb ʔa31 are mostly found in this syntactic position. Exceptions
include the degree adverb xã13 and the focusing adverb ta33kẽ33, which favors the post-verbal
position. Open classes of adverbs, such as manner adverbs, often allow free word order with
respect to the predicate. Adverbs in Zauzou can be contiguous to the predicate they modify (e.g.,
negative adverb ʔa31) or can occur in the left-periphery of the verb phrase as a phrasal adverb
(e.g., degree adverbs xo53ɕi13/lo53ɕi13, manner adverbs, and frequency adverbs). An optional
dependency marker (i.e., adverbializer) xo53/mo53/tə31 can be inserted between an adverb and
predicate, which is often used to promote a post-verbal adverb such as xã13 and post-verbal
manner adverbs to the preverbal position (see §10.2 and §10.4 for relevant discussion).
Degree is a robust semantic domain that is encoded by a diversity of degree adverbs in
Zauzou. In this chapter, I include a lengthy discussion on Zauzou degree adverbs. Data on
syntactic properties and semantic distinctions among various degree expressions have been
collected from Zauzou native speakers by using a list of adjectives and verbs containing 400
lexical items.
Seven major types of adverbs in Zauzou will be discussed in this chapter: the post-verbal
degree adverb xã13 and four additional degree adverbs sa53, lo53ɕi13, xo53ɕi13, and
ka53(tɕi55) (§10.2 and §10.3), manner adverbs (§10.4), frequency adverbs (§10.5), interrogative
adverbs (§10.6), a focusing adverb ta33kẽ33 (§10.7), and the negative adverb ʔa31 (§10.8).
644
10.2 Degree Adverb xã13
xã13 is a multi-functional degree word in Zauzou. It applies to many kinds of predicates
to denote a high degree on the inherent scale of the predicate. The “high degree” meaning
encoded by xã35 is a vague scalar category, ranging from standard-raising in adjectives to
argument quantity, force, and frequency in verbs. It is canonically a degree adverb, which
modifies gradable adjectives and verbs, and serves as an intensifer that increases the standard of
comparison. Forthermore, modifying degrees in verbs are extended from this adjectival domain.
For this reason, throughout this chapter, xã35 is glossed by “very”. In the domain of adjectives,
this degree adverb can freely occur with any gradable adjectives, including degree achievement
verbs (Kennedy & Levin, 2008) with an adjectival core. As a verb modifier, xã13 is a versatile
adverb that can occur with a large variety of gradable/non-gradable verbs, serving distinct
functions. Verbs that are compatible with xã13 involve modal verbs, state verbs, and dynamic
verbs, which may or may not entail a scalar property in the verb per se. Functions of the resultant
V/Adj- xã13 phrases include: (a) raising the standard of comparison; (b) denoting the maximal
value on an upper closed scale; (c) raising the degree of change; (d) denoting incremented
volume/extent of participants and path; (e) denoting incremented force; and (f) denoting the
relatively high frequency of the event. The description below presents the distribution of xã13 in
two types of predicates, adjective phrases and verb phrases, and covers the above six semantic
functions of xã13 phrases. xã35 has two distributions in a verbal/adjectival phrase that include
the predominant postverbal xã35 and the less frequent preverbal xã35. Postverbal and preverbal
xã35 will be discussed separately in the sections below.
10.2.1 Postverbal xã13 Modifying Gradable Adjectives
One of the primary functions of the degree modifier xã13 is to raise the degree to which
the adjective holds its subject. As an adjectival modifier, this adverb must appear after
adjectives, as shown in (10.1):
(10.1)
645
b. tɰ33 ta55kẽ55 ma33 xã13 zo31
3SG only old INT1 FP:assr
“Only he is very old.”
The appearance of the degree adverb xã13 in the sentences in (10.1) raises the relative
standard of comparison (Kennedy, 2012; Kennedy & McNally, 2005) of the adjectives ka33
“good”, ma33 “old”, and tɕʰə33 “ugly”, indicating that the degree of these properties on the
corresponding intensity scales are higher than average. In this sense, xã13 in an adjectival phrase
that serves to raise the standard of comparison.
xã13 can co-occur with another degree adverb, such as lo53ɕi13 and xo53ɕi13, in the
same adjectival phrase and serves the same standard-raising function. The only requirement is
that lo53ɕi13/xo53ɕi13 must precede but xã13 must always follow the adjective. For example:
(10.2)
(10.3)
646
Either lo53ɕi13/xo53ɕi13 or xã13 in the above cases can be eliminated without affecting
the meaning of the adjectival phrase. It seems that the pre-adjectival degree adverbs are not so
closely attached to adjectives as xã13, as other elements may be inserted between the adverb and
the predicative adjective, which is not possible for xã13.
It should be noted there is a category of gradable adjectives in Zauzou that take the same
forms as plain adjectives but can meanwhile express the gradual change of the property denoted
by the adjectival core in addition to their basic adjectival meanings. Such adjectives are claimed
as a verbal category called “degree achievement verbs (DA verbs)” in Kennedy and Levin (2002,
2008). xã13 can modify DA verbs as well but with some restrictions. Different meanings will be
generated for the resultant phrases when xã13 is combined with different DA verbs.
The first type of degree achievement verbs in Zauzou are exemplified by words such as
tɕʰɔ33 “cool/become cool” and me13 “ripe/ripen”. All of these verbs have an inherent maximal
point in common. After the degree adverb xã13 is added to the DA verbs, the resultant meanings
are ambiguous, as illustrated by the examples in (10.4).
(10.4)
The adverb xã13 in the above two examples can either serve the standard-raising function
“very” for adjectives or quantize the maximal degree of change for DA verbs, which could be
translated as “completely”. As a result, tɕʰɔ31 xã13 in (10.4a), when understood as a DA verb,
implies that the temperature of the dish has decreased to an understood endstate of being cool
(i.e., a contextually specified temperature that is accepted by the speech community as “cool”).
647
In this sense, xã13 in (10.4a) serves as a scalar adverb that quantizes the maximal degree of
change. A similar analysis can apply to me13 xã13 in (10.4b).
The second type of DA verbs, involving words such as tsʰə33 “warm” and nõ33 “sick”,
show different semantic properties from the first type of DA verbs after combining with xã13.
Those words do not have an inherent maximal/minimal point and, thus, are “open-scale”
adjectives in terms of Kennedy and McNally (2005). Specifically, the maximal degree reading
“completely” is prohibited in the xã13 phrases headed by adjectives such as tsʰə33 and nõ33. For
example:
(10.5)
xã13 can only be taken as an intensifier in the above two sentences, encoding either the
high degree on the property scale of the predicative adjective, shown as a state verb in (10.5b) or,
arguably, the final status of the DA verb.
For the third type of DA verbs, as exemplified by pʰo13 “open” in (10.6), xã13 is
restricted to express high frequency of the corresponding event, and both “very” and
“completely” readings are not allowed. The adjectival bases of these verbs are “closed-scale”
adjectives in terms of Kennedy and McNally (2005), which have no inherent scalar properties.
(10.6)
648
In (10.6), xã13 in pʰo13 xã13 refers to neither the maximal nor high degree of change on
the scale of openness. This is not due to the lack of scalar property of the predicate per se, as
there are also sentences such as (10.7) in which the same function of denoting maximal degree is
expressed by a distinct lexical form— the adverb tɕa53:
(10.7)
This DA verb is also compatible with the paucal quantifier tə31 ti33 ɳã33 “a
little/slightly”, denoting the door is slightly opened. However, both maximal and high degree
readings are ruled out in the verb phrase pʰo13 xã13. Consequently, the scalar function of xã13
is only applicable to the entire opening event, which quantizes the frequency of this event.
Hence, cool/ripen, hot/sick, and open are subsumed to different sub-classes of gradable
adjectives (along with the corresponding DA verbs) in Zauzou, and each subclass shows distinct
semantic properties when combined with xã13.
649
Zauzou can be modified by xã13, giving rise to the standard-raising meaning as adjectives.
Examples are shown in (10.8):
(10.8)
When modifying a modal verb, such as tʰo53 and ẽ55 in the above two cases, the degree
adverb xã13 increases the degree of the ability possessed by the subject. It should be noted that
modal verbs, which usually denote notions such as possibility, necessity and obligations, all have
lexicalized multi-point scales (Rappaport &Levin, 2005, Rappaport 2008). As a result, the
standard of comparison for modal verbs, including tʰo53 “good at” and ʔẽ55 “MOD:capable” as
examples, could be defined as the degree above a contextually-dependent average level of having
a skill. The addition of xã13 raises the standard to a degree much higher than the average level,
such as mastering this skill or achieving an advanced level.
Similarly, state verbs can also be freely modified by the degree adverb xã13 in Zauzou.
xã13, as a modifier of state verbs, serves the same function of raising the standard of comparison
as in adjectival phrases. In this regard, the ability to take the degree adverb xã13 can be used as
evidence for the homogenenity of gradable adjectives and state verbs in this language. Examples
of a state verb plus xã13 are given below:
(10.9)
650
INT1 FP:assr FP:assr
“People who haven’t heard about this will be scared a lot.”
State verbs, such as ka53 “afraid” and nõ55 “sick” in (10.9), also have lexicalized multi-
point scales at the word level. Unlike dynamic verbs, which entail state change, the gradability of
state verbs is irrelevant of state change but rather is only related to degree change, which is
identical to gradable adjectives in this sense. The verb nõ55 in (10.9b) is potentially ambiguous.
One interpretation is a gradual change from the status of “being slightly sick” toward “being
seriously sick” and, thus, nõ55 acquires an accomplishment interpretation, which assumes the
existence of an end state of the sick event. The other interpretation, in contrast, does not include
a state change but only describes the degree of sickness as higher than the average, which
corresponds to the state verb reading of nõ55. However, in this particular case, the first
interpretation is ruled out. Thus, as a state verb, nõ55 is a scalar verb entailing a lexicalized scale
that forms the basis for comparison, and xã13 serves to raise the degree of sickness in this case.
Gradable adjectives, modal verbs, and state verbs discussed above can be grouped
together as they are gradable in nature and can be modified by xã13 in Zauzou.
10.2.2.2 Denoting incremented volume/extent of participants or path
Scalar verbs plus xã13 may increase the degree on scales other than those entailed in
verbs. The two classes of verbs that have lexically specified volume/extent/path scales are
directed motion verbs ta33 “run”, la13 “ascend”, and kɔ13 “descend”, and incremental theme
verbs u13 “win”, tsu33 “eat”, and yɛ̃53 “sweep”. When appearing with these verbs, xã13 will
increase the degree on the scale of volume/extent associated with the participants of the event or
increase the distance covered on a path that is entailed in a motion event.
In beginning with verbs of directed motion, this type of verb describes events in which
one participant undergoes some sort of gradual change in location along a path (Kennedy &
651
Levin, 2002). ta33 “run” is a typical verb of this type in Zauzou, which entails a multi-point path
scale. An example is provided in (10.10):
(10.10)
ta33 “run” can take xã13 to encode the relatively long distance along the path during the
time of running. This path scale associated with ta33 is also lexically specified, as a running
event with an internal duration must have a distance. It should be noted that the degree adverb in
this case measures the running event by virtue of measuring a distance in a homomorphic
relation (Krifka, 1998) to the temporal trace of the event. In other words, there is a one-to-one
mapping between the distance along a path and the time being consumed. As a result, (10.10)
may receive an alternative reading of “he has run for a long time”. However, the distinction
between time and path scales of directed motions verbs are not morphologically encoded.
la13 “ascend” and kɔ13 “descend” also entail a lexicalized multi-point path scale but
behave slightly differently from ta33 “run”:
(10.11)
652
Identical to ta33 “run”, xã13 in the above two cases also measures the degree of change
over time. Nevertheless, unlike ta33 xã13, it is almost impossible for la13 xã13 and kɔ13 xã13 to
relate themselves to a long distance nor long time reading, even though both verbs entail a path
scale. As a matter of fact, they are more prone to quantize the degree of affectedness (i.e.,
tiredness) of the theme argument that is related to the change-of-location event. In (10.11), it
refers to the high degree of tiredness of the first person subject. To be more precise, though xã13
always denotes a time duration that is longer than average when modifying a verb of directed
motion (i.e., the run time of a particular motion event is longer than average), this adverb does
not always relate to a degree change on the time scale but rather increases the degree of
affectedness (i.e., tiredness) on the participants.
In terms of the so-called incremental theme verbs (e.g., Kagan 2016; Kennedy & Levin
2002, 2007; Rappaport, 2005), such as eat, read, and build, this verb class is usually associated
with an increase in the degree on the scale of volume/extent associated with the object (Kagan,
2016). In other words, this scale is not directly encoded in the verb but rather provided by the
entity in the denotation of the object of the verb (Rappaport, 2005, p.17). A typical Zauzou
incremental theme verb is u13 “win” in (10.12), in which xã13 denotes the relatively large
quantity of the object (i.e., money):
(10.12)
ji33 tsʰã31 ka33 liã33 kʰuɛ33 kẽ33 tsʰo31 wu13 ʔɛ31 wu13
one CL:round LOC two CL:Yuan only extract COMPL also gain
xã13 to53 zo31 pe33
INT1 COMPL FP:assr FP:assr
“He can win as much as two dollars in one game”
However, without a proper context, verbs of this type allow two semantically distinct but
closely related readings, as shown in (10.13):
(10.13)
653
“he ate a lot/? has been eating for a long time”
1
Krifka (1998) points out that in the case of see a picture, it is assumed that Mary sees a picture p during an event e,
and so it may be concluded that she sees p during every part of e, and that she sees every part of p that is visible
from the same perspective.
654
time scale of the verb via pragmatic inference, but not the other way around. Specifically, a time
scale (i.e., duration) is always involved in incremental theme verbs but the volume/extent scale
of the object is not always explicit as this type of verb does not always carry a direct object (see
also Rapapport, 2005). Thus, it is more plausible to assume that in Zauzou, the volume/extent
scale of the object is rested on the time scale lexicalized in incremental theme verbs, which leads
to the homomorphic relation between the two scales.
Though the reading of “win a large quantity of money” is more salient than the reading of
“having been winning for a long time”, as discussed above and shown in (10.12), the latter
cannot be ruled out. In fact, the time scale must be lexicalized prior to the volume/extent scale,
since the increase in the run time of the winning event would likely guarantee the increase in
quantity of the money won by the subject. There are environments in which the second reading is
completely excluded, as shown in (10.14):
(10.14)
In (10.14), the interpretation of “win a lot of money” for u13 xã13 is ruled out, as it
contradicts the proposition expressed in the second clause tə31 ti55 u13 “win a little”.
Consequently, xã13 in this example only denotes the relative lengthy expansion of the winning
event.
However, I also found counter-examples that only allow the reading of incremented
volume/extent in the object, as illustrated by the semantic anomaly in (10.15):
(10.15)
655
The incremented time reading is prohibited in the above example. A possible explanation
is that tsu33 xã13 only denotes incremented volume of the object of eat, which causes a
contradiction with the subsequent clause tə31 ti55 tsu33 “eat a little”.
Verbs of incremental theme in Zauou may also entail a degree change of the affectedness
on its subject, as in the example in (10.16):
(10.16)
In (10.16), the degree adverb xã13 is preferably interpreted as measuring the degree of
change on the first person subject, where it encodes the high degree of tiredness caused by a
sweeping event. In this example, the incremental theme is no longer a direct object, as in (10.12)
- (10.13), but is the volume/extent scale associated with the subject, which can still be converted
to the time scale associated with the verb yɛ̃53 “sweep”. The logic behind such a homomorphic
relation is that the longer the sweeping activity lasts, the more tired the subject will be.
To summarize, the readings of the incremental volume/extent/affect on the participants
(subject or object of the incremental theme verbs) and the long distance on the path scale are all
associated with the time scale entailed in directed motion verbs and incremented theme verbs.
10.2.2.3 Denoting incremented force
In Zauzou, it is also very common for the degree adverb xã13 to modify certain types of
non-scalar verbs and increase the extent of force involved in the action. Two kinds of verbs are
subsumed to this type: verbs of exerting force and weather verbs (Levin, 1993). What these verbs
have in common is that they all contain the feature of [+force] that can be quantized. The force
per se can be lexicalized as a scale and, thus, makes these non-scalar verbs available for
modification by xã13. The following is the verb pẽ53 “push” as an example:
(10.17)
656
“He pushed someone severely [Implication: pushed someone down to the ground]”
In the above example, the combination of pẽ53 xã13 entails a causing event and a
resulting event; the actor exerts a high degree of force to the undergoer, which causes the
undergoer to fall. Here the degree adverb specifies the intensity of force exerted in the action of
push, and the resulting event, fall down to the ground, is directly related to the high intensity of
force exerted in the causing event. The scalar reading of pẽ53 xã13 is not provided by the
resulting event but is confined to the first subevent. A similar example is given in (10.18):
(10.18)
(10.18) exemplifies a caused-motion event in which the causing event, flipping the coin,
causes the coin to spin fast. It can also be posited that a force scale for the verb na55 “flip” and
the high speed associated with the resulting event, the coin spins fast, is due to the increased
extent of force exerted to the coin in the causing event.
As shown in (10.17) and (10.18), a force scale specified for the verb is usually entailed in
a causing event, as signaled by the degree adverb xã13. However, the resulting event is implicitly
encoded and the interpretation of the resulting event is most often contextually dependent. For
example:
(10.19)
657
In (10.19), the causing event is that mosquitoes bite people and there is an unexpressed
resulting state, which is that people feel pain. There are two competing analyses for (10.19). In
the first analysis, xã13 denotes the upper end on the scale of the degree of pain, which is a
property of the undergoer in the biting event and the same participant in the resulting painful
state. In the second reading, xã13 is modifying the verb ŋa̠53 “bite” in the causing event and
encodes the high intensity of force exerted in the biting event. The resulting state, under the
second analysis, is directly associated with the causing event. Intuitively, high intensity of force
will most likely bring about a high degree of pain.
In addition to the cases involving two subevents, as shown in (10.17) - (10.19), verbs of
exerting force plus xã13 can also apply to structures that contain a single event. For example, in
the phrase iɛ̃13 xã13 “laugh out loud”, xã13 can directly modify the intransitive verb iɛ33
“laugh” to denote the high intensity of force exerted in the action of “laugh”.
A second semantic class of non-scalar verbs that also quantize force is the weather verbs
in Levin (1993), such as blow, rain, freeze, gust, and hail. In Zauzou, weather verbs are free to
occur with xã13, denoting that the intensity of the natural force is higher than average. Examples
are given in (10.20):
(10.20)
658
In the above examples, the weather verbs læ33 “blow/shine” and vɰ55 “(rain) fall”
contain lexicalized force scales denoting different kinds of natural forces. The degree adverb
xã13 can apply to these scales to increase the intensity of natural force.
Although verbs of exerting forces and weather verbs are seldom modified by degree
modifiers in other languages, in a strict interpretation, they should be classified into scalar verbs,
as they have lexicalized scales associated with the force of the action denoted by the verb and
can be modified by xã13 in Zauzou.
10.2.2.4 Denoting high frequency of event
The last function of the degree adverb xã13 in Zauzou is to increase the frequency of the
entire event. Verbs that fall into this class are basically achievement verbs that denote punctual
and telic events, such as directed motion verbs entailing a two-point path scale (e.g., enter, exit,
leave, and reach). For verbs that will only generate the “high frequency” reading in the resulting
xã13 phrase, no gradual change is possible between the onset and the endpoint of the event.
Verbs of this type are exemplified by tʰɰ53 “exit”, tsẽ53 “encounter”, and pʰo13 “open” in
(10.21):
(10.21)
659
tʰɰ53 “exit”, tsẽ53 “encounter”, and pʰo13 “open” are all typical achievement verbs in
Zauzou, which are telic and do not have a duration. So, the degree adverb xã13 cannot be used to
encode change on a time scale nor the incremented volume/extent/affect/path. These verbs are
also non-scalar; no gradable properties, including force, are involved in the action denoted by
them. Consequently, the degree word xã13 applies to the telic event as a whole and raises the
frequency of the event. It is a scalar property related to the event, creating the meaning of “an
event X occurs repetitively with a frequency that is much higher than the average”, and is still
consistent with the core function of this degree adverb.
(10.22)
tʰã31 tə55 tə13 tə31 sua33 kẽ33 xã35 xo53 wu13 na55
greedy DIST CL:PL.ani one VCL:occasion only INT1 LINK gain MOD:like
“The greedy people want to win a lot of money in one bet”
Additional examples of preverbal xã35 and the contrast with postverbal xã35 are
presented in (10.23). The preverbal xã35 does not indicate the resulting state and is often used in
imperatives as a manner adverb, while the postverbal xã35 describes a high degree of the
resulting state.
(10.23)
Ex. Gloss
660
Pre-V: xã35 xo53 tsu31 “(Imperative) to eat a lot”
Post-V: tsu31 xã35 “eat a lot”
Pre-V: xã35 xo53 ta55 “(Imperative) to run a lot”
Post-V: ta55 xã35 “run a lot”
Pre-V: xã35 xo53 tsa55 “(Imperative) to pick off a lot”
Post-V: tsa55 xã35 “pick off a lot”
(10.24)
661
(10.25)
In (10.24), both lo53ɕi13 and xo53ɕi13 denote that the degree of goodness is higher than
average. Unlike xã13, the text frequency of lo53ɕi13/xo53ɕi13 suggests that these two adverbs
favor negative environments. When modifying a negative predicate, these two degree adverbs
may take a wide scope over the negation, and increases the standard of comparison for the
property denoted by the predicate along a negative scale, as in (10.25a). It may also apply within
the scope of the negation, which negates the increase of degree, as in the case of (10.25b). These
two adverbs can also modify non-scalar verbs, denoting the high frequency of the event as xã13.
Examples are given in (10.26):
(10.26)
662
eating in (10.26a) and the event of buying in (10.26b) rarely happen. It is unclear if there are any
semantic associations between the event frequency and the volume/extent of the objects of the
verb tso55 and ve31. However, it may be plausible that the low frequency of the eating and
buying events in (10.26) will necesssarily lead to low volume/extent of the object being eaten
and bought. If this view is taken, the function of these two degree adverbs would be identical to
xã13 when modifying incremented theme verbs, such as tso55 and ve31. Otherwise, one would
need to account for the selective constraints of these two classes of degree adverbs.
The functions of lo53ɕi13/xo53ɕi13 and xã13 seem to overlap considerably, and the
discriminative criteria between these two classes of degree adverbs are far from clear except for
their distinct syntactic positions. lo53ɕi13/xo53ɕi13 can even co-occur with xã13 in the same VP,
as illustrated in (10.27):
(10.27)
In the above example, the co-occurrence of two degree adverbs, lo53ɕi55 and xã35, does
not generate extra meaning than the VPs that only employ one degree adverb. It is assumed here
that lo53ɕi13/xo53ɕi13 are phrasal adverbs that apply to the entire verb phrase. Thus, the
predicate and the postverbal adverb xã13 form a closer block, and the unit Adj/V-xã35 is
conjoined with lo53ɕi13/xo53ɕi13. This claim is also supported by the fact that
lo53ɕi13/xo53ɕi13 and the main predicate (including xã35) can be interrupted by other elements,
such as negative adverbs, as shown in (10.25) - (10.26), but the predicate and xã35 cannot. As a
result, the negative form of lo53ɕi13 tɕĩ55 xã35 “very busy” in (10.27) will be lo53ɕi13 ʔa31
tɕĩ55 xã35 “very not busy” rather than *lo53ɕi13 tɕĩ55 ʔa31 xã35.
10.3.2 Attenuative Degree Adverbs ka53tɕi55/ka53
Compared to the intensifiers xã13, lo53ɕi13, and xo53ɕi13, adverbs that express
attenuated degree are much less productive in Zauzou. Only two lexical forms, namely ka53tɕi55
663
and its reduced form ka53, function as degree adverbs that are used to attenuate the standard of
comparison for gradable adjectives/verbs. As shown in the examples below, ka53tɕi55/ka53 are
most commonly used as adverbs modifying gradable adjectives:
(10.28) ka53tɕi55-Adj:
(10.29) ka53-Adj:
664
ka53tɕi55 and its reduced form ka53 in (10.28) - (10.29) appear in the canonical pre-
predicate position for adverbs and deliver the general meaning of an attenuated, moderate degree
of manifestation of a propery, such as the measurements for spiciness, quantity, and size in
(10.28) and the measument for color in (10.29b). For instance, in (10.28a) and (10.29a), the
attenuative adverb indicates that the size of the theme does not exceed the average size that can
be denoted by i33“big”by too much.
ka53tɕi55 and ka53 can serve the same attenuative function for scalar verbs. For
example:
(10.30)
In (10.30), ka53tɕi55 means that the subject does not completely rely on the the family of
his uncle as the degree of dependency is a lexicalized scale in the verb kʰo55. More complex
examples are illustrated in (10.31) in which the attenuative adverb ka53tɕi55 is syntactically
ambiguous. They can be either understood as degree adverbs modifying VP or an argument of
the verb, as both verb object and the degree adverb occur in the same preverbal position in
Zauzou.
(10.31)
665
silver INT2 share eat PURP FP:assr
“(I) planned to share a little silver with others/slightly share silver with others.”
(10.32)
666
“Other (wine) of mine, I can take away the lid and stir it a little (in order to drink)”
ka53tɕi55 in the above example is more likely to denote the short time duration of the
activity of stirring, which is also consistent with my analysis of the intensifier xã13 in §10.2.2.2.
Consequently, one may infer that only a small portion of mass is involved in the stirring event
due to the relatively short duration of this action.
The last point is that ka53tɕi55/ka53, as with the preverbal intensifiers lo53ɕi13 and
xo53ɕi13, are phrasal adverbs that modify the entire VP rather than the single predicate. In the
examples below, the adverb ka53tɕi55 scopes over the entire VP, involving the verb resultative
in (10.33a-b), and the intensifier phrase in (10.33c).
(10.33)
The attenuative adverb ka53tɕi55 is added to the phrase boundary in the above three
sentences. For those VPs, this degree adverb is not directly applied to the verb ve55 “buy”, ɕã55
“put”, and tɕĩ55 “busy” in (10.33) but rather to the entire VP ve55 kʰə33 “difficult to buy”, ɕã55
nɔ13 “put too much”, and tɕĩ55 xã35 “very busy”. ka53tɕi55 in those VPs serves to attenuate the
667
degrees involved in the corresponding VPs. If the verb resultative is encoded by a gradable
adjective, then this attenuative adverb is used to lower the standard of comparison lexicalized in
this adjective, as in the case of (10.33a). If the post-verbal adverb expresses an inverse ordering
of ka53tɕi55, as in the case of (10.33b-c) where nɔ13 “too much” and xã35 “very” both raise the
value on a scale, then the increased value is expected to be attenuated by ka53tɕi55.
668
mia33 “fast” (and its variants kʰa33ma53/kʰa31mia55), tɕã55 “full”, lo31 “good”, and tʰõ31
“smoothly”. Those adverbs all have adjectival bases as they can be modified by degree adverbs
and can appear post-verbally as adjectival complements of the main verb to denote the result
state of an action. The second class (Class 2) consists of adverbs, such as a31ŋæ33tɕʰo55
“unknowingly”, le13 “casually”, and fu53“deliberately”, which are not allowed to occur post-
verbally and do not allow modification of degree adverbs. However, when the two classes of
adverbs appear in front of the verb, they share the function of characterizing manners of verbs.
Examples of the two classes of manner adverbs are given below:
669
As shown in (10.34), xo53 or mo53 as a linking device is optionally used in order to mark
the dependency between a manner adverb and the main verb. The base adjectives, such as tʰõ31
in (10.34c) and kə33 in (10.34d), can be reduplicated to create adverbs. The same class of
manner adverbs exhibits distinct syntactic properties as well. For instance, some adverbs can be
moved to the postverbal position and serve as a serial verb, such as tɕa55 and lo13 in (10.35a) -
(10.35b):
(10.35)
b. ɳa53miɛ13 lo13
sleep good
“sleep well”
However, for adverbs in (10.34c-e), those preverbal adverbials take different forms from
their postverbal counterparts. The disyllabic tʰõ31-tʰõ31 “smoothly”, kə33-kə33 “tightly”, and
kʰa53mia55 “quickly” in (10.34c-e) become the monosyllabic tʰõ31 “smoothly”, tsɿ55 “tightly”,
and mia55 “quickly” in (10.36c-e).
(10.36)
670
“here twist the lid tightly”
(10.37)
671
Class 2 manner adverbs, unlike Class 1 adverbs, cannot be used as verb complements.
Thus, they cannot appear post-verbally to denote the resulting state of the event encoded in the
verb. For example:
Manner adverbs of Class 2 generally cannot denote a resulting state and, thus, they are
restricted to express the manner of acting out an action. According to the examples in (10.38), a
linking adverbializer is not required for Class 2 manner adverbs, even if the adverb itself is a
monosyllabic word, as shown in (10.38b), while adverbializers such as tə33 can still be freely
added to these adverbs, as illustrated in (10.39):
(10.39)
672
“This one pushes it deliberately”
Manner adverbs are also phrasal adverbs that are added to the VP rather than as the core
of predicate. This is supported by the fact that verb argument, such as the object of ɕa33 “hit” in
(10.38c), can be inserted between the manner adverb pa33i33sɿ13 and the main verb ɕa33 in that
sentence. Additional examples are given below:
(10.40)
In the above examples, the main verbs and the manner adverbs kʰa31ma53 “quickly” and
fu31 “deliberately” are interrupted by an overtly marked object in (10.40a) and the time
adverbial tse13mɰ13 in (10.40b), which are consistent with the phrasal adverb assumption.
673
in Zauzou can express various categories of frequentative meanings including often/ frequently,
always, and sometimes. A few representative examples employing frequency adverbs are given
in (10.41) - (10.43):
(10.41) often/frequently:
(10.42) Always:
674
see go.away_from_DC
“Don't always go to these places to listen to nonsense.‘
(10.43) Sometimes:
675
To begin with, sẽ55iã13-pə13tə13 “why“ is the only word I found in the dataset that
employs the compounding strategy. An example is shown in (10.44):
(10.44)
ɳɔ31 sẽ55jã35-pə13də13 ʔa31 kə33 ?
2SG What-because NEG happy
“why are you unhappy?”
676
c. ɳɔ31 xu55-tɕʰã13 na53pĩ53 lo31 ?
2SG Wh-CL:occasion PN.Lanping ascend.away_from_DC
“when will you go to Lanping?”
677
“how to translate 'the judge' into Zauzou?”
The above examples illustrate the use of xu-type interrogative adverbs in content
questions. In fact, those interrogative adverbs are often used in declarative sentences, rendering
indefinite adverbial meanings such as “anytime” and “anywhere”, as shown in (10.49). The same
interrogative adverbs may appear in an interrogative clause that is embedded in a declarative
matrix, as exemplified in (10.50):
(10.49)
(10.50)
678
xuɛ13 kua55 tə55 və13 nɛ55, wu13 və13 ʔa55
how_many CL:large_quantity DIST CL:versatile TOP DIST CL:versatile PROX
kue31tĩ55
predetermine
“How many gifts (should be given) are not predetermined”
The interrogative meanings in xu55-ka55 and xu55-va53 are absent in (10.49). To the
contrary, these two interrogative adverbs, when placed in a declarative sentence, function like an
indefinite/universal quantifier, indicating that the denotation of the verb applies to “anywhere” in
(10.49a) and “every year” in (10.49b). The adverb xuɛ13 in the topic phrase of (10.50), however,
still encodes the interrogative meaning while the embedded question is negated in the matrix.
It is also very common in Zauzou that interrogative adverbs appear in pairs in
decalarative sentences. This kind of construction usually consists of a conditional clause and a
matrix, and each clause contains the same form of a particular interrogative adverb. In those
cases, the semantics of interrogative adverbs overlap with indefinite adverbs and the two adverbs
echo each other. Examples of this kind of conditionals are shown in (10.51).
(10.51)
679
c. ʔa55-tɕi53 ŋə55 xu33-sə3̃ 1 sue55 ʔɛ33 xu33-sə3̃ 1 mə̃55
PROX-time 1 Wh-? think also Wh-? do
“now I do whatever I think [Lit: Now how I think is how I do]”
As the example in (10.51a) shows, the same interrogative adverb xu55-tɕã13 “when”
appears in the conditional clause and the main clause separately. The interrogative meaning
denoted by this adverb can also be understood as the specific but indefinite time “anytime”. The
actual value of the second xu55-tɕã13 is completely dependent on the value that xu55-tɕã13
takes in the conditional clause. The conditional clause and the matrix clause on their own must
be analyzed as standard interrogative clauses but when they are juxtaposed in one larger unit, the
interrogative meaning involved in each subpart is sort of replaced by indefinite readings.
Another peculiar property of Zauzou interrogative adverbs that is worth mentioning is the
co-existence of those adverbs and a subsequent cataphoric noun phrase, as illustrated below:
(10.52)
680
tɕi33 ?
Q;QUOTE;HEARSAY
“(that one is a tiger,) how come you released it?”
In the above three sentences, the adverb xu55-næ13 “which day” is followed by a numeral
phrase tə31 næ13 “one day” in (10.52a), xu33-ka33 “where” is followed by tə31 ka33 “one
place” in (10.52b), and xu55-sə̃31 “how come” in (10.52c) is followed by tə31 və13 “one thing”.
It should be noted that all of these noun phrases in the above sentences are semantically
redundant, as the same noun has already appeared in the preceding xu- adverbs and the topic in
question has been invoked by the noun in the xu- adverb. In other words, it is illogical to employ
those cataphoric NPs to denote the referent that has already been expressed by the interrogative
adverb although this structure is still widely used in interrogative adverbials. A possible reason is
that the noun root in an interrogative adverb is in the process of losing its semantic content and
the corresponding xu- adverb has grammaticalized into a pure interrogative marker without
specifying the subcategorization information in its lexical form. As a result, the subsequent NP
becomes necessary to provide the semantic information of the topic that is being questioned.
(10.53)
681
b. liã33miɛ3̃ 3 tɛ13 ʔɛ31 tə55- pʰɰ31 ta33kẽ33 zo31
two_faces CL:PL.ani also NMLZ- white only FP:assr
“both sides of it are white”
Though ta33kẽ33 in both examples of (10.53) are placed next to the predicates, they are
actually a phrasal focusing adverb that applies to the entire VP. ta33kẽ33 in (10.53a) is adjacent
to the predicate tə31xu33 “same” in a conditional clause. This adverb implies that the assertation
expressed by the matrix is true only when the condition in the conditional clause is satisfied.
However, it does not focalise any single element within the focal domain of this adverb. One
cannot tell whether this adverb exclusively focalizes the predicate and denotes “only same” or
involves the quantity of its subject in its focal domain and denotes “only four”. It is the same for
(10.53b), where ta33kẽ33 focalizes the entire VP “both sides are white” rather than any single
element of the VP.
Sometimes the predicate being focalized is nominalized first, as in (10.54):
(10.54)
682
Two distinct nominalizers xo53 and tə55və13 are used respectively in (10.54a) and
(10.54b) before the focal marker ta33kẽ33. ta33kẽ33 serves as the same phrasal focusing adverb
as in (10.53), licensing the entire nominalized VP as the predicate focus.
Very occasionally, ta33kẽ33 can be promoted to precede the predicate, as shown in
(10.55), in which ta33kẽ33 focalizes the subsequent verb ɕɔ13 “rest”.
(10.55)
The word order of ta33kẽ33-V employed in (10.55) is peculiar in Zauzou. One possible
account could be that the Adv-V order is affected by the word order of the corresponding focus
construction in Mandarin, which employs the Adv-V order for the focusing adverb zhi “only”.
In addition to serving as a phrasal focusing adverb, (ta33)kẽ33 is more commonly used as
a multifunctional focus marker in NPs to focalize its preceding nominals. Examples are given in
(10.56):
(10.56)
683
PN.Jiangmo one village all TOP sixteen CL:family only
nɛ55, jo55niõ33nɰ53 tə33 xõ53 kẽ55 tɕʰi33
TOP cattle one CL:pair only have(inani)
“There are only 16 families in Jiangmo, and there is only one pair of cattle”
Though (ta33)kẽ33 often occurs between a NP and a verb in the same clause, as
illustrated in (10.56a) - (10.56c), this word is unlikely to be a phrasal adverb of the entire VP.
Rather, ta33kẽ33 always follows the focal nominals in the above cases. The position precedes
(ta33)kẽ33, which is the default locus of narrow focus in Zauzou. Evidence provided in (10.57)
shows that this focus marker is sensitive to the syntactic position of focal elements.
(10.57)
Following the analysis for (ta33)kẽ33, the locus of focus in (10.57a) is the locative word
tə33ɕi33 “front”, which is the nominal that is most adjacent to the focus marker ta33kẽ33.
However, if this focus marker is moved to the front of tə33ɕi33, as in (10.57b), the resulting
interpretion of this sentence becomes “only winners are in the front”, as the focus shifts to u13
tə55 tə13 “the winners”, suggesting that focus in Zauzou always falls on the element
immediately preceding the focus marker ta33kẽ33.
684
of syntactic constructions in Zauzou. In addition to negating the main verb in declarative clauses,
ʔa31 is also used in negation of subordinate clauses, as well as clauses employing copular,
existential, and non-verbal predicates, among others. Only one type of negative construction,
namely prohibitive (negative imperative) sentences, is not negated by ʔa31 but rather by a
distinct prohibitive morpheme tə31. In standard negation, it negates the main verb of matrix
clauses, and the presence of the adverb ʔa31 does not affect the word order or the structure of the
corresponding affirmative clause. Thus, according to the classification in Matti (2013), Zauzou is
a language of symmetric negation.
10.8.1 Negation of Main Verb
In Zauzou, the negative adverb ʔa31 is only allowed to appear preverbally. Predicates
that can be negated by ʔa31 include common action verbs and verb phrases, as in (10.58) -
(10.59), and the negation of existential verb ni55, the possessive verb tɕʰi13, and the copula
predicate. These will be discussed separately in the section below. In general, ʔa31 negates the
verbal elements that immediately follow it, which is the default focus domain of this negative
adverb in Zauzou.
The first structural type that involves a negative adverb is ʔa31-VP. Sentences in which
ʔa31 directly modifies a common action verb, negating the denotation of the verb, are illustrated
in (10.58) - (10.59).
(10.58)
(10.59)
685
tomorrow morning TOP 2SG breakfast NEG rice eat
ka53mia53 lɔ31
quickly ascend.away_from_DC
“tomorrow morning you quickly go (to have a look), don't eat breakfast”
The sentence final particle tɕã55 is optionally used in negative declaratives, as shown in
(10.58). This particle is restricted to negative sentences and serves to mark the negative
declarative mood. The negative adverb ʔa31 in the above sentences are required to appear before
the main verb or precede the OV, as demonstrated in (10.59b). ʔa31 is not sensitive to
grammatical categories, such as tense and mood. For example, in (10.59), ʔa31 negates either the
present/realis eating event in (10.59a), or a future/irrealis eating event in (10.59b).
For serial verb constructions that consist of at least a major verb and a minor verb (i.e.,
serial verb or coverb), ʔa31 preferably negates the whole verb complex, including the minor
verb. Distinct from the cases in which ʔa31 is placed between the main verb and the resultative
verb (see §10.7.2), ʔa31 as a negator of the entire verb complex denies the truth value of both
components. For example:
(10.60)
In (10.60a), the adverb ʔa31 is preceding the entire the verb complex pa53 kʰɛ33, which
not only indicates that the state of opening is not achieved but also implies that the action of open
has not been performed. Likewise, ʔa31 in (10.60b) does not simply indicate that the direct
686
object of pã13 “take” has not been received by the recipient but also that the action denoted by
pã13 has never been initiated.
However, there are exceptions. A few types of SVCs may allow the negative adverb ʔa31
to appear between the main verb and the minor verb (see chapter 8). Those SVCs include cause-
effect SVCs, as in (10.61a), most modal SVCs, as in (10.61b), and tense-aspect SVCs denoting
experiential aspect and completive aspect, as in (10.61c-d).
(10.61) V1-ʔa31-V2:
a. cause-effect SVC:
b. modal SVC:
ŋu55 ʔo53 tə31 kẽ55 tɕɔ31xɔ55 ja13və13 kẽ55 ʔa31 wu13 xe31
1 pig CL:PL.ani only take_care SEQ pick_up NEG COMPL FP:assr
“I only take care of the pigs, so I won't be able to reap (the corn)”
687
It is rather exceptional that ʔa31 is often found in constituent negation as well. The
following example shows that ʔa31 is used in constituent negation, negating the constituent
before it:
(10.62)
In (10.62), ʔa31 still precedes the main verb lõ13 “keep”, while one tends to interpret the
instrument argument a55tɕʰo53 læ31 “a basket” of the verb lõ13 “enclose” as the object of
negation. Syntactically, ʔa31 is still an adverb modifying the main verb in this sentence, while
semantically only the instrumental argument is being negated but not the event itself.
The above examples exemplify the use of the negative adverb ʔa31 in a verb complex
with the structure of ʔa31-VP, and this VP is headed by an action verb. The example below
shows that main predicates that can be negated by ʔa31 also include existential verbs, such as
ni55 in (10.63) and the possessive verb tɕʰi13 “have”, as illustrated in (10.64):
(10.63)
(10.64)
688
NEG work_hard NMLZ;LINK one day NEG have(inani)
“There is not a single day that people are not working hard”
(10.65)
However, in some subtypes of SVCs, the negative adverb ʔa31 must be placed
immediately before the corresponding serial verb or coverb. Serial verbs and coverbs that can
directly take the negative adverb ʔa31 contain, but are not restricted to, coverbs denoting
modality, cause-effect serial verbs, aspectual coverb, etc. The linear structure of minor verb
negation is displayed as V-(Serial verb/Coverb)- ʔa31-Serial verb/Coverb, in which the final
minor verb represents the focus of negation.
The first subclass of negative minor verbs are coverbs denoting modality, such as na55
“MOD:like” in (10.66a), ʔẽ55 “MOD:capable” in (10.66b), and tɕɔ13 “MOD:need” in (10.66c):
(10.66)
689
pe55
FP:assr
“As for missing someone, (others) should not be able to miss someone at all”
ʔa31 in the above three sentences unexceptionally negates the modal coverbs na55, ẽ55,
and tɕɔ13, denoting the meaning of “don‘t like”, “unable to”, and “no need to”, respectively.
The same adverb can also be attached to a coverb encoding some aspectual categories,
such as the experiential aspect ku55 and the completive aspect wu13, as shown in (10.67):
(10.67)
690
Obviously, the focus of negation in the above cases falls on the aspectual coverbs ku55
and wu13, which denies the past experience of buying vegetables in (10.67a) and the realization
of the hearing event in (10.67b).
The third type of minor verbs that can take ʔa31 and be directly negated by this adverb
are cause-effect coverbs in symmetrical SVCs, which denote the resulting status of the event
encoded by the main verb. The serial verb may express a result, as illustrated in (10.68a), or a
subjective evaluation of the event in the main clause, as in (10.68b).
(10.68)
The negation of a minor verb is different from the negation of the whole predicate, as
discussed in §6.7.1. The latter by default involves the main verb in the negative focus, while this
is not the case for negation of minor verbs. This is most clearly seen in (10.6), where the
negation of cause-effect serial verbs does not necessarily entail the negation of the main verbs.
ni55 ʔa31 tɕɛ55 in (10.68a) shows that there is no such condition that allows one to sit (i.e., a
sitting state cannot be realized) when a sitting posture that has been initiated or attempted is not
specified. Similarly, the evaluative VPs ni55 ʔa31 lo13 “didn‘t live well” and tsʰa53uɔ55 ʔa33
lo13 “didn‘t marry well” only indicate that the result lo13 “good” is false but does not indicate
that the living event and marrying event did not happen. In fact, the events denoted by the main
verbs must have happened given that one can provide an evaluation on their results.
Negation of minor verbs in Zauzou allows more complex structures of SVCs, and the
negative adverb ʔa31 may occur between two distinct minor verbs in order to negate the second
691
minor verb. I will only introduce two subclasses of minor verbs that commonly appear in the
Serial verb2/Coverb2 position, which is the focus of negation in the structure of V-Serial
verb1/Coverb1-ʔa31-Serial Verb2/Coverb2.
The first subclass of V-Serial verb1/Coverb1-ʔa31-Serial Verb2/Coverb2 contains a
secondary modal coverb, as exemplified by the word tʰo53 “MOD:can;capable” in (10.69):
(10.69)
In (10.69a), the negative adverb ʔa31 appears after the verb sequence tsu33 tu13 “be able
to eat” and precedes the second modal coverb tʰo53 that evaluates the situational possibility (i.e.,
allows by condition) of the proposition denoted by tsu33 tu13. The negative form of this modal
coverb indicates that there is no conditions that allow one to eat sticky rice cake in the normal
days. Similarly, the proposition of “he has the ability to cook” in (10.69b) is rejected by virtue of
negating the modal coverb tʰo53. The proposition evaluated by tʰo53 is a verb resultative
complex tsu33 u13 “eat successully”. Hence, the whole negative verb phrase could be
paraphrased as “the condition doesn‘t allow him to eat successfully”.
The second subclass of coverbs that often appear in the Serial verb2/Coverb2 position are
stative serial verbs, such as mi55 “be free” in (10.70):
(10.70)
692
ʔa31 ŋa53 nɛ55, tæ55 le35 ʔa31 mi55 xe33
NEG COP TOP return come.towards_DC NEG free FP:assr
“Otherwise, I won't have time to come back.”
mi55 is a stative verb in Zauzou, and it is demoted to the secondary serial verb position in
the cause-effect SVC in (10.70). The negation of this serial verb simply states that “there is no
free time to [proposation in V-Serial Verb/Coverb1]”.
Zauzou has a robust system of serial verb constructions. Many verbs serving as the main
verb in a single verb construction can be used as a minor verb in a serial verb construction. If one
accepts the assumption that the negative adverb ʔa31 is restricted to negate predicates involving
verbs, predicative adjectives, and minor verbs, then ʔa31 will become a useful diagnostic to test
verbhood in Zauzou SVCs. Specifically, a verb that is not grammaticalized must be able to be
negated by ʔa31 while those that cannot be directly negated by ʔa31 are usually subjected to
some degree of grammaticalization.
10.8.3 Negation of Subordinate Clause and Copula
The negative adverb ʔa31 often occurs in nominal predicate clauses and complex
sentences containing a subordinate clause together with an affirmative copula word ŋæ53. The
negative copula word ʔa31 ŋæ53 is widely attested in Zauzou, which negates the proposition
encoded by the entire sentence and renders the meaninig of “it is not the case that...” The
following examples illustrate the use of ʔa31 ŋæ53 in a nominal predicate clause, as in (10.70a)
and a complex sentence, as in (10.71b).
(10.71)
693
Zauzou is a language of zero copula. An optional copula word ŋæ53 is used to express
the emphatic meaning for affirmative nominal predicate clauses. However, in a negative nominal
predicate clause, this copula word is required as the negative adverb ʔa31 but cannot be directly
added to a nominal constituent. This is illustrated by (10.71a) in which the nominal predicate
tə31 õ33 “one (animal)” is negated by the negative copula a31 ŋæ53. (10.71b), alternatively,
exemplifies the negation of the entire span of a complex sentence. The sentence in (10.71b)
involves a temporal adverbial clause, “when (s)he is seriously sick”, and a matrix. The negation
scopes over the entire sentence. Not a single constituent, predicate, or a subordinate clause is the
focal element of the negation in this sentence. ʔa31 ŋæ53 in both cases of (10.71) are restricted
to the sentence final position.
Moreover, in Zauzou, there is no way for a negative morpheme to directly negate a
constituent of the predicate2. Thus, the common way for constituent negation to negate the entire
sentence is by employing the negative adverb ʔa31 plus the affirmative copula ŋæ53. The
following are examples:
(10.72)
(10.73)
2
Counter-examples are displayed in §10.7.1. A number of cases show that constituent negation can be achieved in
the structure of NP-ʔa31-V. However, those are considered as exceptional cases in Zauzou negation, which are
different than the general pattern exhibited in the domain of negation.
694
(10.72) illustrates the negation of the focal argument tɰ33 “3sg”, indicating the event
encoded in the predicate is not done by him but rather by someone else. This can only be
achieved by adding the negative copula ʔa31 ŋæ53 in the sentence final position. The sentence in
(10.73), instead, represents the negation of an adjunct argument, which is the location of the
wedding event. In this sentence, the locative phrase su55mi33 jɛ̃33mõ55 ka55 “the girl’s place”
in the negative ʔa31ŋæ53 clause constitutes a contrastive focus to the locative phrase ʔo55vu13
iɛ̃33mõ55 kə55 “the boy‘s place” in the preceding affirmative clause. In both cases, although
ʔa31 ŋæ53 is associated with nominal constituents, this negative copula is syntactically confined
to the sentence final position as a sentential negative marker.
10.8.4 Word Order of Negative Adverb and Degree Expressions
The negative adverb ʔa31 can co-occur with either a preverbal degree adverb, such as
xo53ɕi13 and lo53ɕi13, or a postverbal degree coverb, such as sa53le13. However, preverbal
degree adverbs are statistically favored by Zauzou in a negative environment. Before discussing
negation containing a preverbal degree adverb, I will first examine negation involving a post-
verbal degree coverb sa53le13, as illustrated in (10.74):
(10.74)
In (10.74), the degree coverb sa53le13 denotes a relatively high degree of the inability to
sit. Thus, this degree word actually scopes over the entire negative phrase ni55 ʔa31 tʰo53
“unable to sit”, which increases the degree along a negative scale.
In the case of negative clauses containing a preverbal degree adverb, examples in (10.75)
and (10.76) illustrate negative sentences headed by gradable predicates involving adjectives and
modal coverbs. The negative sentences in (10.75) and (10.76) take the same structure of Deg-
695
Neg-Adj/Coverb. However, the degree word takes a wider scope over the negation in (10.75),
rendering “a very high negative degree”, whereas the negator ʔa31 scopes over the degree word
in (10.76), rendering “a not very high degree”. Both readings are encoded by the same Deg-
Neg-Adj/Coverb construction.
(10.75)
(10.76)
For sentences in (10.75), the degree adverb scopes over the negative adverb and, thus
increases the negative value entailed in the predicate whereas in (10.76), it is the negative adverb
696
that takes a wider scope over the degree adverb, which denies the assertion that “X has a very
high degree on the scale of Y”.
The same structure of Deg-Neg-Predicate also applies to gradable verbs, such as the
incremental theme verb tso33 “eat” in (10.77):
(10.77)
The verb tsu33 “eat” in the above sentence has a lexicalized scale in its object and, thus,
allows modification by a degree adverb such as xo53ɕi35 in (10.77). As discussed earlier (§10.2),
xo53ɕi35 tsu33 means “eat a lot of food” or “eat for a very long time” in affirmative sentences.
Thus, in the negative environment, the two degree interpretations can be negated simultaneously.
Depending on whether a wide scope or narrow scope is taken by xo53ɕi35, two negative
readings, “do not eat a lot of food/eat for a very long time“ (narrow scope) and “eat very little
food/a very short time” (wide scope), will be obtained. However, this kind of ambiguity cannot
be distinguished in a given context.
10.8.5 Negation in Question
The negative copula ʔa31 ŋæ53 is often combined with a sentence final interrogative
marker la31, creating a distinct question word ʔa31-ŋæ53-la31. This question word is only
allowed to appear in the sentence final position, signaling a rhetorical question. See examples in
(10.78) - (10.79):
(10.78)
ʔa55 ja55 tɕã55 tæ13 tɛ5̃ 5 kɰ13 nɛ55, tə33 jɛ5̃ 5 tɛ13
PROX CL:human invite return arrive offer_sacrifice TOP one family all
tso31 wu13 zɔ31 ʔa31-ŋæ53-la31?
eat COMPL FP:assr NEG-COP-Q
“If they invite this person to hold the ceremony, it is possible the whole family can eat
(chicken), isn‘t it?“
697
(10.79)
ʔa55 ka55 ŋu55 to13 le13 nɛ55, ŋu55 mi33 kʰa53 nɛ55
PROX LOC 1 up come.towards_DC TOP 1 fire burn TOP
tɰ55 ʔɛ33 to13 tɛ1̃ 3 zɔ31 ʔa31-ŋæ53-la33 ?
3SG also up arrive FP:assr NEG-COP-Q
“Here when I get up, I light up the fire in the stove, and it is possible that he goes to the stove
as well, isn‘t it?“
The above questions can be analyzed as containing a rhetorical question tag ʔa31-ŋæ53-
la31, which encodes the meaning analogous to the tag question, “Isn‘t it?” in English. ʔa31-
ŋæ53-la31 is usually added after a declarative sentence. Questions of this kind in Zauzou serve
to emphasize that the proposition denoted in the preceding declarative sentence is true.
10.9 Summary
In this chapter, I discussed six classes of commonly used adverbs in Zauzou. Adverbs
typically appear preverbally in Zauzou but there are a few words that express adverbial meanings
yet are restricted to the post-verbal position. The first class of adverbs is degree adverbs, which is
a closed class containing three preverbal adverbs, lo53ɕi13, xo53ɕi13, and ka53(tɕi55), and a
post-verbal adverb xã13. The intensifiers sa53 and xã13 are serial verbs when they modify verbs
in SVCs but are adverbs when they follow adjectives. xã13 “very” is one of the most versatile
adverbs in Zauzou. It not only raises the standard of comparison when it is a degree modifier of
relative adjectives but can also modify many kinds of verbs and generate different meanings
when combined with different types of verbs. The second class of adverbs is manner adverbs,
which all have adjectival bases and are often marked by the adverbializers xo53, mɔ33, and tə31.
A subset of manner adverbs can appear as post-verbal complements, while others can only
appear as preverbal adverbs. Reduplication of adjectives can also generate the same function as
manner adverbs. The third class of adverbs is frequency adverbs, involving tʰi31/tʰə55/tʰe55
“often”, kẽ33 “always”, and tə31tɕʰã13tɕʰã13 “sometimes”. Zauzou employs a closed set of
interrogative adverbs that express an array of wh-adverbs such as “when”, “where”, “why”,
698
“which”, “how”, and “how many/how much.” The wh-morpheme xu33- is consistently used to
derive wh-adverbs from nouns and other word classes. Finally, I described a focusing adverb
ta55kẽ55 and the negative adverb ʔa31. ta55kẽ55 is used to focalize the constituent preceding
this adverb. The negative adverb ʔa31 can immediately precede a main verb or a serial
verb/coverb in SVCs to negate the verbal element following this adverb. ʔa31 can also conflate
with the copula ŋæ53 to form the compound negative copula word ʔa31 ŋæ53, which is retained
in the sentence final position and negates the proposition encoded by the entire sentence.
699