FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR Traditional Grammar vs. Functional Grammar ◦ Traditional grammar focuses on prescriptive rules for correct language usage. ◦ Functional grammar focuses on how language communicates meanings in different contexts. ◦ Both approaches analyze syntax, semantics, and morphology, but functional grammar also takes into account the social and situational factors influencing language production. ◦ Another key difference is that traditional grammar is more concerned with form, while functional grammar emphasizes the function of language structures. Basic correspondences ◦ When we speak or write to each other, we perform acts through words → speech acts. ◦ General types of speech act: statements, questions, exclamations, and directives. Basic correspondences (Cont) Speech acts ◦ Speech acts are the acts we perform through words. Certain general types of speech acts are basic to everyday interaction; there are statements, questions, exclamations, and directives. ◦ Each of these basic speech acts is associated in the grammar with a type of clause: the declarative is typically used to encode a statement, the interrogative a question, the imperative a directive, and the exclamative an exclamation. ◦ These are the direct correspondences between form and function that we refer to as direct speech acts. Speech acts (Cont) ◦ It considers the degree to which utterances (acts of speech) are said to perform locutionary acts, illocutionary acts, and/or perlocutionary acts. ◦ In each of these, the acts can either be direct or indirect, which quantifies how effective they are at conveying the speaker's message to its intended audience. Speech acts (Cont) ◦ Indirect correspondences are also common in English. Thus declaratives, as well as encoding statements, can be used to ask questions, utter exclamations, and issue directives, in addition to other speech acts such as promising and warning. In such cases, the form is used to convey an ‘intended meaning’ or ‘illocutionary force’. ◦ E.g. You’re staying here, then? ◦ It has the form of declarative – but, with appropriate intonation, the force is that of a question, as is indicated by the punctuation. The relationship between clause type and force is therefore not one-to-one but many-to-many. Speech acts (Cont) ◦ Even more indirectly, the words we use do not always fully express our intended speech act. E.g. It’s cold in here. ◦ This might be intended and interpreted as a request to turn up the heating. Hearers use inference to recover the intended meaning at specific points in a conversation, based on assumptions of cooperativeness, truth, relevance, and cultural knowledge. Speech-act theory (Cont) ◦ A locutionary act is the act of making a meaningful utterance consisting of the verbal employment of units of expression such as words and sentences. ◦ Locutionary acts should not be meaningless speech but should have a purpose, either seeking to bolster an argument, express an opinion, or cause someone to take action.
1. Don't go into the water
2. The coffee tastes great. 3. How are you, sir? Locutionary Acts have meaning ◦ Asking for answering a question; ◦ Giving some information or an assurance or a warning; ◦ Announcing a verdict or an intention; ◦ Pronouncing a sentence; ◦ Making an appointment, an appeal, or a criticism; ◦ Making an identification or giving a description. Speech-act theory (Cont) ◦ An illocutionary act refers to the use of a sentence to express an attitude with a certain function or "force," called an illocutionary force, which differs from locutionary acts in that they carry a certain urgency and appeal to the meaning and direction of the speaker. ◦ An illocutionary act is the underlying intention or purpose of an utterance. E.g. ◦ The baby is crying. Speech-act theory (Cont) ◦ The illocutionary act can take many forms: ◦ making a promise, ◦ giving an order, ◦ asking a question, ◦ making a suggestion, ◦ apologizing, ◦ Thanking, etc. ◦ The type of illocutionary act depends on the speaker's intention and the context in which the utterance is made. Speech-act theory (Cont) ◦ Perlocutionary acts, on the other hand, bring consequences to the audience such as saying, "I will not be your friend." In this instance, the impending loss of friendship is an illocutionary act while the effect of frightening the friend into compliance is a perlocutionary act. ◦ A perlocutionary act is a type of speech act that refers to the effect or impact that an utterance has on the listener or the broader social context. It is the act of using language to achieve a particular outcome (e.g. change someone’s mind) or influence the behavior or attitudes of others. Speech-act theory (Cont) ◦ The perlocutionary act can take many forms: ◦ persuading, ◦ inspiring, ◦ calming, ◦ comforting, ◦ arousing, ◦ offending, or ◦ upsetting. ◦ The type of perlocutionary act depends on the speaker’s intention, the context, and the listener’s interpretation. Speech-act theory (Cont) Locutionary act is the production of meaningful utterances and expressions (E.g. “Go away!”, “Come here”, “Who are you?”, etc.) → Leading to illocutionary act – the intention of producing meaningful expression (promise, offering, etc), → Causing the performance of perlocutionary act – the effect of the locutionary and illocutionary act (behavior, feeling, belief, etc). Speech-act theory (Cont) Identify the type of the following utterances and explain your ideas: 1. 'If you release the children, we'll allow the press to publish your demands,’ says the police negotiator. 2. ‘Please find the black cat!’ 3. ‘Fire!’, shouts a woman. 4. The sky is blue. Speech-act theory (Cont) A: The doorbell’s ringing. B: I’m in the bath. A: Okay, I’ll go. ◦ A’s first utterance is to be interpreted as a directive to B: ‘Answer the door’. ◦ B’s utterance counts as a statement explaining why she can’t answer the door (‘I’m in the bath’), at the same time implying that A should answer the door. ◦ A’s second utterance shows that he has inferred the implied request and will comply with it. Notice that neither participant has made specific reference to answering the door. Relationship Between Speaker and Listener ◦ Because perlocutionary and illocutionary acts depend on the audience's reaction to a given speech, the relationship between speaker and listener is important to understand in the context of such acts of speech. ◦ The old adage "know your audience" becomes especially relevant in understanding discourse theory, and indeed in composing a good speech or speaking well in general. ◦ For the illocutionary act to be effective, the speaker must use language that his or her audience will understand as intended. Michael Halliday ◦ British-born Australian linguist ◦ Describes language as a ‘meaning potential’ ◦ → Linguistics is the study of how people exchange meanings by ‘languaging’. ◦ His early work involved the study of his son’s developing language abilities. Overview of Functional Grammar ◦ Functional grammar, as explained by Halliday (1994) is concerned with meanings. ◦ Functional grammar looks at language as consisting of units of meanings rather than chunks of forms. ◦ In keeping with the idea, functional grammar is interested in analyzing language at the text level rather than sentences. Overview of Functional Grammar (Cont) ◦ Further, Halliday (1994) writes that there are three lines of meaning in the clause: (1) the theme functions in the structure of the clause as a message; (2) the subject functions in the structure of the clause as an exchange; (3) the actor functions in the structure of the clause as representation. ◦ Giving more explanation about functional grammar, he adds that functional grammar makes extensive use of function labels like actor, process, goal, theme & rheme etc. Clause vs. Sentence Traditional grammar Functional grammar
◦A sentence is a There are three sentence
complete unit consisting types: of subject and predicate ◦ Simple sentence OR ◦ Compound sentence ◦A sentence is a ◦ Complex sentence grammatical unit having one or several clauses. Clause vs. Sentence (Cont) ◦ A clause is a grammatical unit having at least one predicate and one explicit subject or implicit subject, stating a proposition. Number of clause Number of sentence He can’t lift the table. 1 1 Stay! 1 1 Hello! 1 He gets up early to catch the 1 1 first train. He walked in, sat down, and 3 1 began to talk. Clause as Message ◦ A clause has a character of message, giving it the status of communicative event. ◦ That communicative character comes from one part of the clause, known as THEME. ◦ Theme and rheme help us understand how information is conveyed in clauses.
My sister goes to school every morning.
Theme rheme
Theme: the subject or main idea in a talk, piece of writing;
Rheme: the part of a sentence or clause that adds new information to what the reader or audience already knows (from Oxford Dictionary). Theme & Rheme ◦ The cat tore up the newspaper. ◦ The newspaper was torn by the cat. ◦ Last night the cat tore up the newspaper. ◦ It is the newspaper that the cat tore up. ◦ It is annoying that the cat tore up the newspaper. ◦ What annoys me is the cat tore up the newspaper.
THEME RHEME Metafunctions in SFG (Halliday, 1972)
Metafunctions
Ideational Interpersonal Textual
Ideational function ◦ Language is used to talk about our experience of the world, including our inner world, to describe: ◦ Events ◦ States, and ◦ The entities involved I went to the cinema with my best friend yesterday afternoon. I always feel happy when I’m with her. Interpersonal function ◦ Language is used for people: ◦ To interact with each other ◦ To establish & maintain relationships ◦ To please, to anger, & to influence each other’s behavior ◦ To get help ◦ To express sympathy. Would you hand me your paper, please? Hand me your paper!
MOOD: realizes the interaction between the speaker
(writer) &hearer (reader) Textual function ◦ Relates to mode – the internal organization and communicative nature of a text. ◦ Includes: ◦ Textual interactivity. ◦ Spontaneity (lexical density, grammatical complexity, coordination, etc.) → Theme & rheme. TIME TO SAY GOODBYE Huyen Nguyen M.A. (She/Her) Lecturer, Linguistics Division, English Department Hanoi University, Km9 Nguyen Trai Road, Nam Tu Liem District Hanoi, Vietnam | M: +84 978 466 689 E: huyen.nguyen@hanu.edu.vn ResearchGate | ORCID | LinkedIn