Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rolls Royce Solutions America - Beyond The Highway - Marine
Rolls Royce Solutions America - Beyond The Highway - Marine
on the Water
Rolls Royce Power Systems– Commercial Marine
Andrew Packer, Senior Manager, Marine Applications Engineering
g/kW h
regulating shipping. 6
IMO Target Pollutant: 2011 1.96
4
• NOx
2 2016
0
NOX
© 2020 Rolls
-Royce Not Subject to Export Control
3
EPA enforced 82% NOx and 98% PM reduction ov er the y ears
G/KW H
States. 6 2007*
5
Marine Diesel Target Pollutant:
4
1.8
• NOx 3 2012*
• PM
2 0 0 .2 0 .12 2014 0 .0 4
1 -17*
• HC 0
• CO
NOX PM
*Emission Tier requirements for the Series 40 0 0 Marine Engine based on Model Year.
© 2020 Rolls
-Royce Not Subject to Export Control
4
Beginning in 20 24, C AR B proposes an additional 85% PM
reduction ov er EPA Tier 4c limits
C AR B C HC
C AR B C HC (E P A Tier 4c + 85% additional reduc tion in P M)
0.04
C alifornia Air R esource B oard
(C AR B ) C ommercial Harbor
C raft (C HC ) Proposed 0.04
Amendments.
0.035
Marine Diesel Target Pollutant: 0.03
G/KW H
• EPA Tier 4c + 85% PM ↓ 0.025 2014-17
0.02 0 .0 0 67
0.015
0.01 2024–29*
0.005
0
PM
*Part of C AR B’s C HC Proposed Amendments, as a phased in approach based on engine build date.
© 2020 Rolls
-Royce Not Subject to Export Control
5
Increase Technology to Achieve Greener Emissions
mtu Approach
S4000M03
IMO II / EPA T2
S4000M04
IMO II / EPA T3
© 2020 Rolls
-Royce Not Subject to Export Control
6
Piston / R ing / Turbocharger
Liner
K ey Technologies
mtu 16V 40 0 0
Exhaust After SCR Flat-Box Configuration SCR Cube Box Configuration
Treatment (SC R )
© 2020 Rolls
-Royce Not Subject to Export Control
9
Regulation Configuration Benefits
Modular approach • PM R eduction (+ exceeds regulation)
to meet IMO II, IMO • Exhaust backpressure up to 20 0 mbar
III and EPA Tier 4 IMO II • R educed oil C onsumption
emission regulation • Easily upgrade to IMO III
Engine (only)
A summary of the benefits
associated with implementing
• PM R eduction (+ exceeds regulation)
the new technology. • Exhaust backpressure up to 85mbar
• R educed oil C onsumption
IMO III • Airless DEF Dosing System
• Fully insulated
• Integrated Sound Attenuation
Engine + SC R
© 2020 Rolls
-Royce Not Subject to Export Control
10
C AR B proposes DPF DPF Design Considerations:
Mandate by 20 24 – • C urrently reviewing the best approach to develop and integrate a Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) into
20 29* an existing and new vessel build.
• Factory solution or 3 rd party solution
As part of the EMA, RRS is an
active participant in the • Pre-SC R (requires emission testing) or Post-SC R installation
collaboration between C AR B ,
EPA, and the USC G to ensure • Need to address fire protection controls and vessel stability calculations.
the proposed amendments to
• Many marine applications do not provide sufficient time at high exhaust temperatures required for a
C AR B ’s C HC rules meet the
passive regeneration DPF system. Therefore, an active regeneration DPF system would be required.
emission reduction goals of
C AR B , at the same time, • A typically active regeneration DPF system consists of the following components:
identifying solutions that are
feasible from a technical and • DPF w/ burner, burner control unit, full-flow burner, sensors, air supply, and fuel supply.
financial perspective for the
operators required to comply
Commercial Considerations:
• These systems require significant space (~ 50 % of engine) and add significant weight to the vessel (~
25% of engine). Depending on vessel type, operator has to assess feasibility to fit a system in an
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our- existing vessel. Especially, if it was not originally built with EPA Tier 4 engines, both a SC R and DPF
work/programs/commercial-harbor-craft/chc-
meetings-workshops
would need to be installed.
• W hat is the risk for an engine manufacturer to develop a DPF solution and afterwards such
requirement be abandoned by policy makers, if operators cannot accommodate these systems in
their vessels.
11
*Phased in approach based on engine build date.
C AR B proposes Fuel Approval Considerations:
R enewable Diesel • Verified at zero hour testing at the factory and through in-use field measurements on
engines with up to 20 ,0 0 0 hours of use.
mandate by
• B ased on limited testing, R R S is comfortable that the use of renewable diesel in our mtu
J anuary 20 23 S40 0 0 Marine EPA Tier 2 & Tier 3 certified engines will not cause any component
longevity issues.
Confirmed that the use of
R enewable Diesel (EN 15940 / • C urrently evaluating the long-term effects (if any) on the emission output of the engine
ASTM D975-12a) in diesel that requires an after-treatment system (i.e. EPA Tier 4c / IMO III).
engines certified under EPA
Diesel Marine R egulations
does not have any negative Customer feedback based on 42,000 accumulated engine operating hours:
effects on the engine
emissions performance. • Visible smoke witnessed at the dock on ULSD has been eliminated with the transition to
R D.
• No meaningful change in fuel consumption or vessel speed.
• No change in engine maintenance costs – no increase in filter exchanges or any
abnormal engine alarms.
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-
work/programs/commercial-harbor-craft/chc- Commercial Considerations:
meetings-workshops
• Operators report fluctuating costs for renewable diesel which increases their OPEX,
while rider fare stays flat.
eFuels
• Power to X
Digitalization
• Performance
optimization
System Integration
• Microgrids
Thank y ou for y our attention!