Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Synopsis Deptt. of Home Science NIILM University
PDF Synopsis Deptt. of Home Science NIILM University
Synopsis Submitted to
Doctor of Philosophy
{Home Science}
By
__________________
Enrollment No NU/PR/PHD/22/254
Dr. -------------------------
Department of Home Science
INTRODUCTION
LITERATURE SURVEY
NEED OF THE STUDY
PROBLEM FORMULATION
OBJECTIVES
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
TENTATIVE CHAPTER SCHEME
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
INTRODUCTION
Home gardens have been an integral part of local food systems in developing countries around the
world. Many studies provide descriptive evidence and analysis of home gardens in developing
countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America and pinpoint their numerous benefits to communities
and families. They encapsulate perpetual small-scaled subsistence agricultural systems established
by the households to obtain and supplement the food requirements of the family. Home gardens are
mainly intended to grow and produce food items for family consumption, but they can be diversified
to produce outputs that have multiple uses including indigenous medicine and home remedies for
certain illnesses, kindling and alternative fuel source, manure, building material, and animal feed.
Chris Landon-Lane provides an overview of the benefits of home gardens and describes home
gardens as a 'place for innovation' with the potential to improve the livelihood of peri-urban and
rural communities. In-depth exploration of past and more recent compositions on home gardens
worldwide not only affirms Landon-Lane’s insight but also recognize additional advantages. We
broadly categorized benefits of home gardening into three components: (1) social; (2) economic;
and (3) environmental benefits. These benefits are presented and explained through the vast
experiences on home gardens from developing nations around the world.
LITERATURE SURVEY
Reviews of studies from various countries reveal that the degree and combination socio-cultural
impacts on societies engaged in home gardening vary across the board. Multiple social benefits of
home gardens include enhancing food and nutritional security in many socio-economic and political
situations, improving family health and human capacity, empowering women, promoting social
justice and equity, and preserving indigenous knowledge and culture .
The most fundamental social benefit of home gardens stems from their direct contributions to
household food security by increasing availability, accessibility, and utilization of food products.
Home gardens are maintained for easy access to fresh plant and animal food sources in both rural
and urban locales. Food items from home gardens add substantially to the family energy and nutritive
requirements on a continuous basis. A pioneering research study on home gardens conducted by
Ochse and Terra in the early 1930s states that home gardens led to 18% of the caloric and 14% of
the protein consumption by households in Kutowinangun, Indonesia. Subsequent studies on the
Javanese home gardens point out a direct link between successful home gardens and households’
nutritional status , and observe an increase in households’ food consumption with intensification of
home food production. Javanese experiences illustrating the potential of home gardens to add to
households’ food supply and nutrition, as well as their eminence as multi-storied agro-ecosystem in
the tropics, heightened the global attention towards home gardens.
Foods from home gardens varied from horticultural crops to roots to palm and animal products;
further plants from the gardens are also used as spices, herbs, medicines, and fodder for the animals.
Although home gardens are not generally reputed as a staple crop production base, Thaman
documented that Pacific Islanders obtained their main staple root crops from home gardens. Similar
reports were found from Nepal, Yucatan Peninsula , Bangladesh , Peru , Ghana, and Zimbabwe .
Resource-poor families often depended more on home gardens for their food staples and secondary
staples than those endowed with a fair amount of assets and resources such as land and capital. For
poor and marginalized families unable to afford expensive animal products to fulfil their nutritional
needs, home gardens offer a cheap source of nutritive foods. Through gardening, households can
have better access to a diversity of plant and animal food items that lead to an overall increase in
dietary intake and boost the bioavailability and absorption of essential nutrients.
As stated by Marsh , home gardens provide easy day-to-day access to an assortment of fresh and
nutritious foods for the household and accordingly those homes obtained more than 50% of the
vegetables, fruits, tubers, and yams from their garden. Supporting this premise, different studies
conclude that, while adding to the caloric quantity, home gardens supplement staple-based diet with
a significant portion of proteins , vitamins , and minerals, leading to an enriched and balanced diet
particularly for growing children and mothers . Additionally, plants from the gardens - especially
spices and herbs - are used as flavor enhancers, teas, and condiments. Recently, countries like
Bangladesh have been successful in increasing the availability and consumption of vitamin A-rich
food items through national home gardening programs.
Furthermore, the integration of livestock and poultry activities into home gardening reinforces food
and nutritional security for the families as milk, eggs, and meat from home-raised animals provided
the main and, in many instances, the only source of animal protein . In some places, home gardeners
are also engaged in mushroom cultivation and beekeeping and even small fresh water fish ponds are
incorporated into the garden space adding to the share of proteins and other nutrients available for
the family .
Evidence from around the world suggests that home gardens can be a versatile option to address food
insecurity in various challenging situations, and thus they have attracted sponsorship by numerous
government and non-governmental organizations. Consequently, home garden production has
significantly increased in the country and has been instrumental in reducing ‘hidden hunger’ and
disease cause by micronutrient deficiency. In an attempt to assess the dynamics of home garden
evolution in Java and Sulawesi in Indonesia, Wiersum notes that home gardens make available a
small but continuous flow of subsistence food products for the household. Also, home gardens
provide the main source of staple food for people in heavily degraded and densely populated areas
with limited croplands.
Home gardens can ensure food to underprivileged and resources-poor households as they can be
established and maintained within a small patch of land or with no land using a few inputs . A study
of home gardens in Cuba reveals that they were used as a strategy to increase resilience and ensure
food security in the face of economic crisis and political isolation . To mitigate recurring food
shortage and malnutrition, Cuban households obtained basic staple foods (rice and beans) through
rations, but the households relied on their home gardens to obtain additional produce to diversify the
family diet . Ensuring a reliable and convenient source of food, fiber, and fuel for the family, they
are viewed as a robust food system in circumstances where population pressures and numerous
resource limitations persist. In the Peruvian capital of Lima, home gardening has led to nutritional
benefits to families living in slum areas by increasing the availability of carbohydrates as well as
nutrient-rich vegetables and fruits that are not economically accessible for poor slum dwellers .
The Global Hunger Index specified that the lack of political stability has escalated hunger and poverty
in countries affected by conflicts. Similarly, environmental disaster can also have devastating impacts
on communities and disable food production systems . Even though there are only a few published
narratives, home gardens have been proposed as an option for food and nutritional security in disaster,
conflict, and other post-crisis situations . Home gardens based on inset and coffee are an integrated
farming system that not only provide subsistence and complementary food products for Ethiopian
families, especially during famines, but also provide the primary means of employment for the
household .
Tajikistan became independent from the Soviet Union in 1991 but was plagued by a civil war soon
after. Rowe showed that, during the post-soviet era, Tajik families tormented by civil war,
agricultural downfall, and drought heavily depended on their gardens for food. This trend still
continues, and home gardens continue to significantly supplement household food security and
sustenance. In recent years, several countries transitioning towards peace and stability and those that
are recovering from natural disaster have been adopting policies that support home gardening to
reduce the prevalence and severity of hunger and malnutrition .
Bandarin et. al. point out that, in a post-conflict setting, assistance and reconciliation mechanisms
work best and result in environmental, social and economic benefits when there is a cultural or
traditional linkage between the target population and the intervention. Hence, home garden projects
offer a realistic solution as in most countries home gardening is a regular day-to-day activity amongst
the household, especially for women. In addition, home gardens when properly managed provide a
four-in-one solution to the food and nutrition problem by increasing household food availability,
enabling greater physical, economic and social access, providing an array of nutrients, and protecting
and buffering the household against food shortages.
NEED FOR THE STUDY
India ranks 102nd out of 117 countries in the 2019 Global Hunger Index, and suffers from a
serious level of hunger with a score of 30.3.[1] Indeed, the country continues to grapple with a
high rate of undernutrition, and managing it continues to be a massive challenge. The stunting
levels are 38.4 percent and underweight numbers are 35.8 percent as reported in the National
Family Health Survey 4 (NFHS-4). There has been only a marginal improvement over the years.
Undernutrition leads to long-term effects, including cognitive and growth deficits and reduced
immunity to infections. It is the underlying cause of nearly half of all deaths amongst children
under five years of age in India.
Food security continues to be a matter of grave concern for India. Despite being the second
largest producer of food, India is home to the world’s second largest undernourished population
(195.9 million). A review of studies examining the link between food security and malnutrition in
children suggests a direct association with undernutrition in children in middle-income
countries.Another study concludes that undernutrition/stunting is a consequence of household
food insecurity.
India tops the list of countries with 46.6 million stunted children under the age of five, followed
by Nigeria and Pakistan at 13.9 and 10.7 million, respectively. Among Asian countries, wasting is
highest in India, standing at 25.5 million. Evidence also suggests that two-thirds of India’s current
workforce are stunted, and because of the enormous economic costs incurred it has reduced the
country’s future per capita income.
The incidence of stunting in children tends to be higher in rural areas than in urban, possibly due
to the generally lower incomes in rural areas. This doubles in children born to mothers with no
schooling as compared to mothers with 12 or more years of schooling. Stunting also shows a
steady decline with increase in household income. There is a wide regional variation as well:
states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Jharkhand record rates of more than 40 percent stunting,
whereas Kerala and Goa have lower rates at 20 percent. However, Chhattisgarh recorded a 15-
point drop in stunting in the last decade, while Tamil Nadu has recorded the slowest progress.
A study on stunting prevalence shows variation across districts (12.4–65.1 percent) with 239 of
640 districts having stunting levels above 40 percent. Uttar Pradesh tops the list, with six out of
10 districts having the highest rates of stunting (Map 1). On the other hand, there are districts
with low levels of stunting from states which are otherwise high on stunting prevalence like
Odisha with two of the top ten districts (Cuttack 15.3 percent and Puri 16.1 percent) with lowest
prevalence.
The Government of India has taken significant steps for providing food security and combating
malnutrition over the past four decades through the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) by
providing supplementary food to children, pregnant and lactating women and take-home rations; the
Mid-Day Meal programme; and strengthening the Public Distribution System (PDS). The National Food
Security Act 2013 ensures access to adequate quantity of quality food through the government food
security programmes. Despite this, 195.9 million people go hungry every day.
There is a need to look at multiple strategies to combat the issue of food security in the context of the
ever-growing demand. Community gardens can play an important role in providing national food
security by supplementing rations and providing essential nutrients. Nutrition gardens enhance dietary
diversity by providing micronutrients through constant supply of fruits and vegetables sufficient to meet
the family’s requirements. Thus, nutrition gardens can prove to be a sustainable model for providing food
security and diversity to combat malnutrition at the household or community level.
PROBLEM FORMULATION
.
India may be the world’s second largest producer of food, but it has its second largest
undernourished population. Further, more than half of women in India suffer from anaemia,
which is one of the reasons for the high rate of low-birth weight babies. An unbalanced diet and
lack of food is directly linked to high rates of stunting, excessive weight, and death in children
under five years of age. The Government of India has implemented programmes for providing
food security and ensuring access to adequate quantity of quality food. There is a need to look at
multiple strategies to combat the issue of food security. Community and nutrition gardens can
play an important role in enhancing national food security and dietary diversity to combat
malnutrition. More than half (53.1 percent) of women (15–49 years) in India are anaemic, which
has lasting effects on future pregnancies, and is also one of the causes for the high rate of low-
birth weight babies. [10]The situation worsens when infants are fed inadequate diets. According to
the World Health Organization (WHO), an unbalanced diet and lack of food (other than mother’s
milk), is directly linked to high rates of stunting, excessive weight, and death in children under
five years of age. It is therefore important to break this intergenerational cycle of malnutrition.
The 1,000 days from conception till two years of age are crucial and provide an opportunity to
prevent childhood stunting and obesity problems later in life. Exclusive breastfeeding, long
considered the best form of nutrition for newborns, averages 42 percent globally, while India lags
behind in terms of exclusive breastfeeding at 54.9 percent and complementary feeding at 42.7
percent, with only 9.6 percent children receiving an adequate diet. Figure 1 shows the rate of
infant and young child feeding practices from the NFHS-4 as compared to the Comprehensive
National Nutrition Survey (CNNS). A deterioration in minimum adequacy of diet is observed,
which is a cause of concern.
OBJECTIVES
We measure food security using a slightly varied application of the Household Food Insecurity
Access Scale (HFIAS) methodology, developed by USAID . With a recall period of 4 weeks, this
methodology was originally developed for the FANTA (USAID) initiative with the aim of
providing a holistic methodology to capture the experience of food insecurity . The senior-most
knowledgeable female of the household was asked a series of questions on household
member’s experiences of food insecurity. In particular, questions were asked of household’s
food intake and coping strategies in the event of non-availability of food, over the past 4 weeks.
Each respondent’s self-reported assessment of their household’s food security was classified
into the following five discrete categories: (i) ‘Shortage of food’= 1 if in the last 4 weeks:
respondent worried that the household would not have enough food; or any household member
had to eat a limited variety of foods; or any household member had to eat a smaller meal than
needed; or any household member had to eat fewer meals in a day; or there was ever no food
to eat of any kind in the household; or any household member went to sleep hungry at night
because of lack of food; or any household member had to go 24 h without eating anything
because of lack of food, 0 otherwise. (ii) ‘Hunger’ = 1 if at any point in the last 4 weeks, there
was no food of any kind in the household; or any household member went to sleep hungry at
night because of lack of food; or any household member had to go 24 h without eating anything
because of lack of food, 0 otherwise; (iii) ‘change food’ = 1 if in the last 4 weeks: any household
member had to change their diet to cheaper; or less preferred foods, or were not able to eat the
kinds of foods their prefer, because of a lack of resources, 0 otherwise; (iv) ‘reduce food’ = 1 if
in the last 4 weeks: any household member had to eat a limited variety of foods because of a
lack of resources; or eat a smaller meal than they felt was needed, or eat fewer meals in a day,
because there wasn’t enough food, 0 otherwise; and (v) ‘Borrow’ = 1 if in the past 4 weeks: the
household took food on credit from a local shop; or had to borrow food from relatives or
neighbours, 0 otherwise.
Responses to (i) and (ii) directly assess levels of household food insecurity, whereas (iii) (iv)
relate to household’s coping strategies in the event of food shortages.
Given that these responses capture different elements of food insecurity, the dependent
variable food security is measured separately for each of the five potential food security
indicators. Accordingly, we estimate binary choice reduced form univariate Probit models for
each of the five food insecurity indicators. Formally, the model can be written in the following
general form:
(1)
Where the dependent variable Food securityi captures the food security in household i, the
vector socio-econ refers to the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the
household measured using household size and the gender of the household head; household’s
economic characteristics are captured using wealth quintiles (based on household assets and
calculated using principal components analysis). The household’s land-owning status is
measured using a dummy variable that takes on a value of one if the household owned land, 0
otherwise, and for land-owning households, we include categorical variables for land size. We
include a dummy variable for whether or not the household has a home garden and the vector
geographical includes indicator variables for the six townships in the sample. Further details
on the explanatory variables and descriptive statistics are provided below.
Our next dependent variable is a measure of dietary diversity. As previously discussed, dietary
diversity is commonly used as a proxy measure for the quality of human diets [13, 14]. Previous
research has found dietary diversity to be positively associated with measures of food security
[32, 33]. Using a 24-h food recall methodology [10], self-reported consumption of food items
were grouped into ten food groups in accordance with the Minimum Dietary Diversity –
Women (MDD-W) methodology . The same household member answering the food security
questions also provided information on the food intake of household members. The diversity
of household diets is measured as the intake of food from the ten discrete food groups among
household members over the previous 24 h, and takes on a value of 1 if anyone in the household
consumed those foods in the previous 24 h, 0 otherwise.
The dietary diversity methodology has previously been used to construct the variable Dietary
Diversity Score (DDS), which measures the number of unique food groups (rather than number
of different foods) consumed by members of the household over the last 24 h . We are interested
in the diversity of food groups rather than the number of foods because it is possible that a
household has consumed a large number of foods, but they may all be from the same food
group, thus not providing any diversity in diet.
The ten food groups considered are those with the most density of nutrients, and therefore
those most important in diet: starchy staples, beans and peas, dairy, flesh foods, eggs, nuts and
seeds, dark, leafy greens (Vitamin A rich), Other fruits and vegetables (Vitamin A rich), Other
fruits and other vegetables.
To construct the DDS variable, binary response variables are defined for each of the values
taken by the DDS variable. A household is classified as being in the category DDS2 if household
members consumed at least one food from two different food groups, and zero otherwise; a
household is defined as having a DDS3 if it consumed at least three of the food items and zero
otherwise and so on. In our sample, we observe that on average households in Chin ate from
3.5 food groups; households in Ayeyarwady from 3.9 food groups and households from Magway
from 4.9 food groups. The DDS is clustered between 2 and 5 food groups, with DDS2 being the
worst outcome, and DDS5 being the best outcome. Since nearly all the households in our
sample consumed from at least two food groups, and given the natural ordering of the DDS
variable, we use the Ordered Probit model for our empirical analyses.
Specifically, following previous research , we categorise the DDS into four categories: DDS2,
DDS3, DDS4 and DDS5, where DDS2 is the lowest category of dietary diversity. The food
consumption categories are represented by an ordered variable V that assumes the discrete
ordered values of 0, 1,.. .and j. The ordered probit model for V (conditional on explanatory
variables x) can be derived from a latent variable model.
Assume that the latent variable D* is determined by D* = x0b + e, where x is a vector of
household’s socioeconomic and community-level characteristics entering the equation and e
refers to the error term, which we assume is normally distributed across observations.
However, D*, the propensity to consume from a particular food group, is unobserved. Given
that we observe D, the household’s dietary diversity status, the observed aspects of a
household’s dietary diversity status can formally be written as:
and each of these categories is a discrete category of the dependent variable, which can be
explained by the same set of explanatory variables.
Explanatory variables
The key explanatory variable used in this paper is a measure of whether the household had
access to a home garden.
TENTETIVE CHAPTER SCHEME
CONCLUSION
The literature summarized in an earlier section of this brief supports the promotion of nutrition
gardens as a sustainable practice to improve nutrition and food security by contributing
significantly to dietary diversity. This is true for India as well. Kitchen gardens can help strengthen
food security and improve income generation and livelihoods.
The Government of India launched the National Nutrition Mission or POSHAN Abhiyaan with the
objective of a multi-ministerial convergence mission to ensure attainment of a malnutrition-free
India by 2022. It calls for creating synergy and linking the schemes of other key departments
through convergence mechanism to achieve a common goal. The National Rural Livelihood
Mission is promoting kitchen gardens as part of farm livelihood intervention strategy for National
Nutrition Mission, to combat malnutrition by promoting healthy eating and improving agro-
ecological practices. Households are encouraged to develop vegetable gardens, and data shows
increase in consumption of vegetables, improved dietary diversity and generation of income.
Mizoram has begun developing school spaces for kitchen gardens called ‘Kan Sikul, Kan Huan’ or
My School, My Farm, to improve the nutritional content of meals served to children. Chhattisgarh’s
district with highest prevalence of malnutrition, Bijapur, has developed kitchen gardens in
anganwadi centres in remote areas. Government schools in Chandigarh are developing mini farms
to provide for their mid-day meals.
The Ministry of Human Resource Development has developed guidelines for school nutrition
(kitchen) gardens in government and aided schools under the mid-day meal scheme. There are
proven initiatives across states, which can learn from each other’s experience and replicate best
practices.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[25]
Heather Graham, Deborah Lane Beall, Mary Lussier, Peggy McLaughlin and Sheri
Zidenberg-Cherr, “Use of school gardens in academic instruction,” Journal of Nutrition
Education and Behavior 37, no. 3 (2005): 147–151.
[26]
Nancy M. Wells, Beth M. Myers, and Charles R. Henderson, “Study protocol: Effects of
school gardens on children’s physical activity,” Archives of Public Health 72, no. 1 (2014): 43.
[27]
Dilrukshi Hashini Galhena, Russell Freed, and Karim M. Maredia, “Home gardens: A
promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing,” Agriculture & Food
Security 2, no. 1 (2013): 8.
[28]
Leelangi Wanasundera, “Rural women in Sri Lanka’s post conflict rural economy,” Rap
Publication 13 (2006): 7–43.
[29]
Salesh Kumar Jindal and Major Singh Dhaliwal, “Development of vegetable nutrition garden
model for diet diversification and improved nutrition security of urban and peri-urban
households,” International Journal of Horticulture 7 (2017).
[30]
L. Bhattacharjee, S. Phithayaphone, and B. K. Nandi, “Home gardens key to improved
nutritional well-being,” RAP Publication (FAO) (2006).
[31]
N. Kehli, “Micro gardening as a contribution to food security and nutrition in Africa“.
[32]
Debika Goswami, “Kitchen Garden: Empowering rural women”.
[33]
Prashant K. Parida, S. Malarvannan, Ajit Kumar Sahu, Rajdeep Behera, Jaganath Naik, and
Oliver King Edi, “Nutrition Sensitive Annadata Kitchen Garden Model: Growth for health and
wellbeing of tribal poor–A couple of case studies.” Current Research in Nutrition and Food
Science 6, no. 3 (2018): 882–890.
[34]
ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticulture Research, “Backyard Nutritional Kitchen
Gardening—A success story,” https://iihr.res.in/backyard-nutritional-kitchen-gardening-
success-story-0
[35]
J. Krishnan, “Nutrition Gardens—Women lead the way”.
[36]
Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, Tahmeed Ahmed, Robert E. Black, Simon Cousens, Kathryn Dewey, Elsa
Giugliani, Batool A. Haider et al., “What works? Interventions for maternal and child
undernutrition and survival,” The Lancet 371, no. 9610 (2008): 417–440.
[37]
Aliza Pradhan, Raju Sathanandhan, Akshaya Kumar Panda, and Rupal Wagh, “Improving
household diet diversity through promotion of nutrition gardens in India.” American Journal of
Food Science and Nutrition 5 (2018): 43–51.
[38]
A. Talukder, N. J. Haselow, A. K. Osei, E. Villate, D. Reario, H. Kroeun, L. SokHoing, A.
Uddin, S. Dhunge, and V. Quinn, “Homestead food production model contributes to improved
household food security and nutrition status of young children and women in poor populations.
Lessons learned from scaling-up programs in Asia (Bangladesh, Cambodia, Nepal and
Philippines),” Field Actions Science Reports. The Journal of Field Actions Special Issue 1 (2010).
Mapira Nyasha, Nhire Shiela, and Chikozho Martin, “Effectiveness of Nutrition Gardens in
[39]
enhancing sustainable livelihood of orphans and vulnerable children: A case study of Mkoba
Nutrition Gardens in Gweru Urban, Zimbabwe,” International Journal of Management 2, no. 5
(2014): 209–221.
[40]
Muhammad Mohsin, Muhammad Mushahid Anwar, Farrukh Jamal, Fahad Ajmal, and Juergen
Breuste, “Assessing the role and effectiveness of kitchen gardening toward food security in
Punjab, Pakistan: A case of district Bahawalpur,” International Journal of Urban Sustainable
Development 9, no. 1 (2017): 64–78.
[41]
Tannaz J. Birdi and Shimoni U. Shah, “Implementing perennial kitchen garden model to
improve diet diversity in Melghat, India.” Global Journal of Health Science 8, no. 4 (2016): 10.
[42]
Patricia A. Carney, Janet L. Hamada, Rebecca Rdesinski, Lorena Sprager, Katelyn R. Nichols,
Betty Y. Liu, Joel Pelayo, Maria Antonia Sanchez, and Jacklien Shannon, “Impact of a
community gardening project on vegetable intake, food security and family relationships: A
community-based participatory research study,” Journal of Community Health 37, no. 4 (2012):
874–881.
[43]
T. P. Ijinu, N. Anish, H. Shiju, V. George, and P. Pushpangadan, “Home gardens for
nutritional and primary health security of rural poor of South Kerala,” Indian Journal of
Traditional Knowledge 10, no. 3 (2011): 413–428.
[44]
R. Narayanan and A. K. Panda, “Vegetable cultivation in home gardens—A study in three
tribal villages of Odisha India,” The Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 48, no. 5 (2011):
187–196.
[45]
Florencia Montagnini,”Homegardens of Mesoamerica: Biodiversity, food security, and
nutrient management,” In Tropical Homegardens (pp. 61-84. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006).
[46]
Soumi Kundu, “Jharkhand’s Kitchen Gardens add nutrition to rural diets, and lower food bill”.
[47]
Aparna Pallavi, “Become Iron Woman, Eat
Veggies,” https://www.downtoearth.org.in/coverage/become-iron-woman-eat-veggies-41035
[48]
Constance Rybak, Hadijah Ally Mbwana, Michelle Bonatti, Stefan Sieber, and Klaus Müller,
“Status and scope of kitchen gardening of green leafy vegetables in rural Tanzania: Implications
for nutrition interventions,” Food Security 10, no. 6 (2018): 1437–1447.
[49]
Rinchen Norby Wangchuk, “My School, My Farm: Mizoram IAS Officer tackles malnutrition
with a brilliant idea!” thebetterindia.com, https://www.thebetterindia.com/189687/ias-hero-
mizoram-malnutrition-agriculture-lawngtlai/
[50]
Deanna K. Olney, Aminuzzaman Talukder, Lora L. Iannotti, Marie T. Ruel, and Victoria
Quinn, “Assessing impact and impact pathways of a homestead food production program on
household and child nutrition in Cambodia,” Food and Nutrition Bulletin 30, no. 4 (2009): 355–
369.
[51]
Emily Bloss, Fidelis Wainaina, and Robert C. Bailey, “Prevalence and predictors of
underweight, stunting, and wasting among children aged 5 and under in western Kenya,” Journal
of Tropical Pediatrics 50, no. 5 (2004): 260–270.
[52]
Savita Arya, Satya Prakash, Sarita Joshi, Kirti M. Tripathi, and Vinita Singh, “Household food
security through kitchen gardening in rural areas of Western Uttar Pradesh, India,” International
Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7, no. 2 (2018): 468–474.
[53]
UN-ESCAP, “Sustainable agriculture and food security in Asia and the Pacific.” Bangkok:
UN ESCAP (2009).
Robin Marsh, “Building on traditional gardening to improve household food security,” Food
[54]