NUCES, KHI

Student Course Evaluation Analysis Report Spring 2024

CS5001 - Research Methodology Section:MSP-2A Date: 4-Jun-24

Instructor: Syed Muazzam Ali Shah Registered Students: 40 Received Feedbacks: 22

4=Strongly Agree, 3=Agree, 2=Uncertain, 1=Dissatisfied, 0=Strongly Disagree Rating Formula: Sum(Q.Wgt x Avg) / Sum(Q.Wgt)

CGPA Range: 3.00 - 4.00 2.00 - 2.99 0.00 - 1.99

Question 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 0 Wt. Avg. Prod

1 The course objectives were discussed by the 6 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 1 3.5 3.5

instructor during early lectures.
2 The course plan contained a reasonable amount of 5 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 1 3.41 3.41
research work.
3 The instructor has the capability to communicate the 5 3 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 2 0 0 1 3.27 3.27
subject matter effectively.
4 The course stimulated my interest to conduct 5 1 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 4 2 0 1 1 2.91 2.91
research in the subject area.
5 The instructor came prepared for each lecture in the 6 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 1 3.27 3.27
class.
6 The instructor was acquainted with state-of-the-art 7 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 2 0 0 1 3.45 3.45
research work related to the subject.
7 The instructor presented the concepts and ideas of 5 3 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 1 3.27 3.27
the subject clearly.
8 The instructor encouraged discussion of research 6 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 1 3.41 3.41
ideas related to the subject.
9 The instructor was responsive to student needs and 6 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 1 3.5 3.5
problems.
10 I was able to openly discuss novel research ideas 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 1 3.45 3.45
related to the subject.
11 The instructor arrived for lectures in the classroom 9 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 1 3.73 3.73
on time.
12 The grading of evaluation items (assignments, 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 1 3.45 3.45
quizzes, midterms) was fair.
13 The instructor provided feedback for the graded 7 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 1 3.55 3.55
quizzes, assignments etc. in a reasonable amount of
time.
14 The research work was relevant to the materials 5 3 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 1 3.32 3.32
presented in the course.
15 The instructor was available during the specified 4 5 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 4 5 1 0 0 1 3.27 3.27
office hours.
16 There was sufficient contact time (face to face 4 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 1 3.41 3.41
and/or virtual/online) opportunity between instructor
and students to support effective learning .
17 The instructor has completed the whole course as 5 3 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 1 3.41 3.41
per the course plan shared in the course outline.
18 The instructor had the habit of leaving the classroom 7 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 1 0 1 3.55 3.55
at the designated time.
19 The learning environment in the classroom was 4 3 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 1 3.27 3.27
conducive for knowledge acquisition.
20 The course was well organized ( e.g. timely access 4 5 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 3 2 1 0 1 3.18 3.18
to materials, feedback, notification of changes, etc.).
21 The course workload was manageable. 5 4 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 1 1 3.18 3.18

22 The course material related to real-world research 4 4 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 3 2 1 0 1 3.09 3.09

work and applications.
23 Recommended text and reference books were 5 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 1 0 1 3.36 3.36
relevant and appropriate.
24 The instructor discussed the relevant research 3 6 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 1 0 1 3.32 3.32
material (articles, technical reports).
25 The course has helped me either to conceive the 3 1 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 1 1 2.77 2.77
research thesis idea or contributed my thesis.
26 I feel confident about independent learning as a 3 4 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 2 0 1 3 3
result of the course.
27 I would like to consider the instructor as my thesis 3 3 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 4 4 2 0 0 1 2.86 2.86
supervisor.

Page 1 of 2
 NUCES, KHI

Student Course Evaluation Analysis Report Spring 2024

CS5001 - Research Methodology Section:MSP-2A Date: 4-Jun-24

Instructor: Syed Muazzam Ali Shah Registered Students: 40 Received Feedbacks: 22

Total: 27 89.18 %

Overall Rating: 82.58

Comments

Course Content and Organization

1 good
2 Good
3 The course too much covered in short time,
4 Well Manged and organized
5 Yes.

Assignment, Quizzes Evaluation

6 good
7 Fair.
8 Little bit tough.
9 Well Manged, and Fair

Instructor’s quality of delivery of lectures and classroom learning environment

10 good
11 Amazing teacher he just loves to teach I really enjoyed his classes specially the way he deliver looking
forward to take more courses in future please sir teach us elective as well you are the most cooperative
teacher.
12 Not gaining interest in the lectures.
13 V.good
14 Best Quality of Delievery

Learning Material (Textbook, References Books, Videos etc)

15 good
16 Fair.
17 Relatable
18 Best Recommendations

Page 2 of 2