Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Facts and Case Studies
Facts and Case Studies
Facts and Case Studies
Copenhagen Informed by IPCC that deep Didn’t establish binding targets Environmental
(2009) cuts needed States required to submit success/failures
Recognized EDW’s blame from reduction targets by 2010 but
industrialization didn’t establish mechanism to
State’s responsible for 80% of monitor if these targets were
emissions agreed to commit to being met and no penalties
reducing emissions
Failed to generate enough
Green climate fund set up in
sense of urgency as
which developed states
pledged $100b in aid by 2020 sovereignty allowed targets to
to EDW be ignored
Paris (2015) Established temperature rise in IPCC said how even if all set Environmental
21st century should not be targets were fulfilled the success/failures
more than 1.5 degrees global temperature increase
88% of global emissions ratified would still be 3 degrees
the treaty Didn’t agree to mandatory
States create own ambitious cuts
targets which are then States didn't create ambitious
monitored to encourage goals
compliance Trump withdrew and Russia
has been very limited (7.5% of
global emissions)
NAFTA Increased value of trade Led to job losses from America Regionalism
(economic) between members ($290bn- to Mexico where it is cheaper Failures
$1.1t) Renegotiated under Trump to
USMCA focusing on each
members best interests
therefore lacks a sense of
regional identity
African Union AUSC a mechanism for forces 54 members all at different Regionalism
(economic and to intervene in member states stages of development when
political) to prevent defiance of the EEC was established with 6
55 members international law developed nations
NEPAD encourages regional Tribal and ethnic differences
trade and integration that have caused conflicts
Plans for single market and (Rwanda, DRC) shows a lack of
monetary union regional identity for enhanced
cooperation
AU has tolerated HR abuses of
dictators (Libya and Sudan)
show its lack of commitment
Charter commits to defending
sovereignty and independence
of its members
Arab League Agreed to suspend Syria’s and Decisions taken by council are Regionalism
(security and Libya’s membership due to HR only binding on member states
political) violations that supported them and
22 members The council with all state’s when states don’t, they rarely
leaders meets twice a year and follow the agreements
in 2019 met with EU to discuss Failed to encourage peace as
global issues lack of consensus on response
to gulf wars
Failed to intervene in Libya
ASEAN Regional forum allows it to Commitment to eventual free Regionalism
(economic and work with China and Japan to market undermined by
political) peacefully resolve regional economic disparities
10 members disputes (Singapore and Cambodia) and
Free trade agreements political disparities
amongst its members and (communist Vietnam and
China democratic Malaysia)
The 6th largest economy in Diplomatic influenced
2018 decreased from allies amongst
Non- Proliferation agreement members (Cambodia and
China vs Philippines and USA)
so a lack of response to South
China Sea
Committed to non-
interference between
members so criticized on lack
of support for Rohingya
Muslims in Myanmar
Key decision makers are heads
of state and not supranational
bodies which prevents
increased integration
Cultural Globalization:
10 most successful global restaurant chains and 10 most profitable films are all American
Real Madrid & Manchester United are 2 of the most popular sports teams in the world, while
Chelsea has a strong following in Latin America
UNSC:
USA:
China: