1.

Introduction
From the extensive reading and review of the article I have found that purpose of the
article is to improve the comprehension of the triple constraint and its dynamics and
how these elements can be used to advance project success.
The reader of this paper should have a knowledge and a background on project
management as the article tries to fill the literature gap that exists on triple constraint
the reader should be familiarized with Dynamics of the triple constraint and other
related theories.
The article is appropriate as it effectively communicates its message to the intended
audience and as it is well-researched, back with literature review, and structured
logically with clear arguments.
2. Summary
As stated by the author, this article investigates the concept of the project
management triangle and the triple constraint, as there is a lack of literature on triple
constraint and its dynamics, this knowledge gap results in project managers not
effectively using triple constraint effectively as they don’t see them as an interrelated
system. To address this problem, the writer put forth TRIJECT model that proposes
that two constraints should be flexible. This idea can be backed by the evidence
presented in the NASM case, it can be observed in order to finish the project in a
timely manner without driving the cost high and without the risk of not delivery
world-class museum the project manager should focus on value rather than the
sacrifice of the exploitation effort.
3. Results
The primary discovery highlighted in the article revolves around the acknowledgment
that each project inherently possesses distinct limitations on its capacity for
exploitation. This necessitates a meticulous examination of these unique constraints.
In conclusion an integrated model that evolves the strategic management of the
TRIJECT model using Polarity Management techniques, this involves leveraging
Polarity Management techniques, providing project teams with a dynamic framework
to effectively navigate their activities in alignment with all essential elements. In
essence, the article advocates for a holistic and adaptable approach to project
management that considers and addresses the multifaceted and individualized
constraints inherent in each project.
4. Contributions
Yes, the article does contribute to the knowledge of research as triple constrain was a
neglected topic and as many considered these constraints inflexible, the proposed
model adds to the understanding of finite resources and ways to manage the
competing triple constraints which adds to the body of research that exists.
5. Foundation
Overall, the article provides a multifaceted exploration of different concepts, offering
particle insights, case study, and potential framework for project managers to navigate
the complex landscape of the triple constraint. By addressing the dynamics, trade-offs
and power structure. The article aims to equip readers with deeper understanding
6. General Critique
The article seems to predominantly rely on descriptive arguments to convey key
findings. While the literature review and discussions provide a solid foundation, the
absence of statistical data for inferential analysis raises concerns about the depth of
support for the conclusions drawn. A more comprehensive approach may involve
incorporating statistical analyses to validate and strengthen the presented arguments.

Economic analysis

the degree to which the economic advantages of something to

be made, done, or achieved are greater than the economic
costs