Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management Accounting Set 3
Management Accounting Set 3
Tutorial Set 3
Edspira
Questions:
Flow of production
Flow of production
Total Direct materials Conversion costs
Work in progress, 2,000+3,000=5,000 2,000 3,000
opening
Costs added during 40,000+197,500= 40,000 197,500
the period 237,500
Equivalent units 8,000 7,850
Cost per equivalent 40,000/8,000=5kr/unit 197,500/7,850=26,15kr/unit
unit
Cost to account for 242,500
In FIFO when calculating the cost per unit we take the cost only added in the period.
COSTS
Finished goods in the beginning: 2,000+3,000=5,000
Finished started in previous, finished in this: 350 · 25 ,16=8 806
Finished goods started and finished in this 7 000 · 5+7 000 ·25 , 16=211120
period:
In production at the end: 1000 ·5+ 500· 25 , 16=17,580
Total costs allocated: 5 000+8 805 , 73+211114 , 65+17 579 , 62=242 500
Ending 17,580
Ending WIP
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
Flow of production
WA:
Equivalent units
Direct materials Conversion costs
Completed and 7500kg 7500kg 7500kg
transferred out during
the period
Work in progress, 1,000 100%*1,000=1,000 50%*1000 = 500
closing
Accounted for (sum) 7,500+1,000=8,500
Total equivalent units 7,500+1,000=8,500 7,500+500=8,000
COSTS
Finished goods in the beginning: 7 500 · 4,941+7 500 ·25,0625=225 026 , 25
In production at the end: 1 000 · 4,941+500· 25,0625=17 472 , 25
Total costs allocated: 42 000+ 200500=242 500
Usually, since WA takes costs from the last period and current period, it is more stable comparing to
FIFO which uses only the cost from the current period that is influenced by the changes (for instance
inflation).
We transfer a smaller cost to the finished goods by using FIFO, since the primo costs were smaller
than the costs added during the period. This is classical for FIFO, because you take the costs from the
opening WIP (DM and conversion costs). The previous costs are often cheaper than the current
period, due to inflation etc. In using WA we average the costs by mixing the costs from the previous
period with the costs added during the period.
Both FIFO and WA show a significantly higher cost per kg. salt, compared to standard costs. This is
due to standard costing presuming that the company utilizes its full capacity. An assumption that did
not hold for May, upon which we calculate FIFO and WA. If you do not continuously update the values
in standard costing, then this method can prove problematic, given that the gap between allocated
and actual costs increase.
Flow of production Physical units Direct Materials Conversion costs
Work in progres, 20 20 12
opening CC=60%
Started during 80
October
To account for 100
Completed and 90 90 90
transferred out in
October
Work in progress, 10 10 7
closing CC=70%
Accounted for 100 100 97
Work done to date 100 97