Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
www.fems-microbiology.org
Abstract
The beginning of modern microbiology can be traced back to the 1870s, and it was based on the development of new concepts that
originated during the two preceding centuries on the role of microorganisms, new experimental methods, and discoveries in chemistry,
physics, and evolutionary cell biology. The crucial progress was the isolation and growth on solid media of clone cultures arising from single
cells and the demonstration that these pure cultures have specific, inheritable characteristics and metabolic capacities. The doctrine of the
spontaneous generation of microorganisms, which stimulated research for a century, lost its role as an important concept. Microorganisms
were discovered to be causative agents of infectious diseases and of specific metabolic processes. Microscopy techniques advanced studies on
microorganisms. The discovery of sexuality and development in microorganisms and Darwin's theory of evolution contributed to the
founding of microbiology as a science. Ferdinand Cohn (1828^1898), a pioneer in the developmental biology of lower plants, considerably
promoted the taxonomy and physiology of bacteria, discovered the heat-resistant endospores of bacilli, and was active in applied
microbiology. ß 2000 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords : Concepts in microbiology ; Infectious disease ; Spontaneous generation ; Inheritable feature; Taxonomy of bacteria ; Physiological diversity ;
Bacillus endospore ; Ferdinand Cohn
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226
2. The roots of modern science originated in the 17th and 18th centuries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226
3. The progress of biology in the 19th century . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226
3.1. The progress in chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
3.2. Anatomy, microscopy, developmental cell biology, and sexuality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
3.3. The development of the evolutionary view in biology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
4. The discovery of microorganisms and their ¢rst classi¢cation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
4.1. The bacteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
4.2. The fungi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
4.3. The protozoa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
5. The concepts of taxonomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
5.1. The species problem in bacteriology and new concepts for classi¢cation . . . . . . . . . . . 231
6. Spontaneous generation vs. evolution of microorganisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
7. The concepts of biological diversity of bacteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
7.1. The organismic and chemical theories of fermentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
7.2. Autotrophy, chemolithotrophy, and phototrophy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
7.3. Putrefaction and pathogenicity of bacteria, and immunology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
8. The achievements of Ferdinand Cohn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
* Tel. : +49 (761) 2032607; Fax: +49 (761) 2032779; E-mail : drews@pop3.uni-freiburg.de
0168-6445 / 00 / $20.00 ß 2000 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 1 6 8 - 6 4 4 5 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 2 6 - 7
nal transubstantiation of God in the world' (1848); Gott- fermentation, and photosynthesis, but the problem of en-
fried D. Nees von Esenbeck (1776^1858); and Carl Gustav ergy coupling, i.e. the linkage between energy-yielding and
Carus (1789^1869), who made careful comparative studies energy-consuming processes, was not resolved before the
in di¡erent ¢elds, but tried to explain biological phenom- 1940s and 1960s.
ena by teleological principles. These men proposed `ideal
forms' and linked them with the conception of the purpose 3.2. Anatomy, microscopy, developmental cell biology, and
that is inherent in living things. The ideas of Naturphilo- sexuality
sophie, which dominated in the ¢rst half of the 19th cen-
tury, especially in Germany, were replaced by the unifying In the 16th to 18th centuries, the great diversity of
idea of natural sciences in order to discover the laws of plants and animals was recognized and the anatomy of
nature and to rule humanity. One exponent of this think- humans, animals, and plants was described in numerous
ing was the German pathologist and anthropologist Ru- comprehensive articles.
dolf Virchow (1821^1902) [5,6]. The ¢rst microscopes consisting of one or two optical
lenses were build by Johannes and Zacharias Janssen
lems in the preparation of microphotographs were vividly aware that extant life forms were organized di¡erently
described by Heymann [13]. than those of earlier periods of the Earth's history. It
The cells as building stones of tissues and organisms was also realized that most organisms live in restricted
were described by C.F. Wol¡. The great period of cell areas, in natural habitats. The question of the origin of
biology began in the 1840s with the availability of an species was realized and the descent of species from com-
improved microscope, the knowledge of comparative his- mon ancestors was discussed, but the static view of nature
tology increased, and new thoughts on the role of cells and the belief that all organisms could be traced back to
grew [15]. Johannes E. Purkinje (1787^1869) was the ¢rst creation or di¡erent forms of spontaneous generation,
to use the term protoplasm [16] and proposed the idea of such as abiogenesis or heterogenesis, dominated
the similarity of animal and plant cells. Hugo von Mohl [3,27,28]. Species were believed to be invariable.
(1805^1872) and Matthias J. Schleiden (1804^1881) were Jean Baptiste Antoine de Monet Chevalier de Lamarck
recognized as the founders of the cell theory; they consid- (1744^1828) was one of the ¢rst to explain the multiplicity
ered the cell as an independent living entity of all organ- of forms of organization and their gradation from primi-
isms [17^19]. Initially the protoplasm was considered as a tive to highly developed species by a process of evolution
the 19th century, and the concept of spontaneous gener- causal analysis of infectious diseases will be dealt with in
ation by abiogenesis was revived to explain the formation Section 7.3.
of the ¢rst organisms on Earth [6,27]. Carl von Linnë classi¢ed the microscopic organisms in
the genus `chaos' (1773^1776). Otto Friedrich Mu«ller
(1730^1784) criticized the scientists of this epoch for con-
4. The discovery of microorganisms and their ¢rst templating the infusoria without any critical characteriza-
classi¢cation tion and classi¢cation. In his book Animalcula infusoria
£uviatilia et marina, he classi¢ed the infusoria by morpho-
4.1. The bacteria logical and biological criteria, such as movement, habitat,
and formation of aggregates. From the 18 genera he pro-
The supposition that various diseases are caused by mi- posed, only several characteristic types, especially Flagel-
croorganisms was expressed several times in the early lit- lata and Ciliata, can be identi¢ed. Bacteria, but also Pro-
erature [29]. In 36 BC, Marcus Terentius Varro wrote that tozoa, appear under the taxa Monas and Vibrio. He
animals (animalia quaedam minuta) that cannot be fol- described 10 species of Monas and 31 species of Vibrio.
and bread making. Fungi were also used as food, drugs, or development of the fungus inside the wheat plant [49]. In
poison. the same year, Felice Fontana published the results of his
In the 16th and 17th centuries, the shape, appearance, microscopy studies on the rust of grain. Bënëdict Prëvost
and usefulness for man of numerous fungi were described, (1755^1819), who was not familiar with these important
for example, by Charles de L'Ecluse (Clusius ; 1526^1609) observations, published in 1807 his detailed and careful
[41]. Gaspard Bauhin (1560^1624) was the ¢rst to discern studies on the germination of bunt or smut spores and
genera and species in his detailed and illustrated descrip- the infection and development of the fungus in wheat
tion of plants. In his book, 2700 species of plants and 100 plants. He observed that copper sulfate inhibits the germi-
species of fungi were described. The fungi were separated nation of spores, and he demonstrated by ¢eld experi-
into esculentii, noxii, and perniciosi [42]. Joseph Pitton de ments that the disease can be controlled by soaking the
Tournefort (1656^1708) presented a hierarchical ordered wheat seeds in a solution of copper sulfate [50]. Although
system with detailed descriptions of genera [43]. Fungi this method was not widely accepted at that time, it was a
were separated into six groups: (1) centrally stalked with precursor of the Bordeaux mixture, introduced by Pierre
cap; (2) centrally stalked without cap; (3) laterally Millardet in 1885, which became in combination with the
besides the macroelements and one organic carbon source, than morphological characteristics for classi¢cation, e.g.
trace elements were essential for the growth of Aspergillus, physiological and ecological features; and whether the
but their exact analysis required improved methods for characters should be weighted. The re¢ned and extended
puri¢cation, which were not available at that time. knowledge of organisms living in di¡erent parts of the
world and the revolution in philosophical thinking made
4.3. The protozoa the downward classi¢cation of essentialism unsuitable for
classi¢cation. Practical considerations led to the adapta-
The protozoa, called `infusoria', have been described in tion of an upward classi¢cation of empirical grouping us-
many monographs since the 17th century. Christian Gott- ing numerous characteristics. This method started with the
fried Ehrenberg (1795^1876) was well known for his de- characterization of species, followed by sorting of species
tailed and comprehensive description of more than 500 into groups of similar ones, and combining these groups
species [38]. He observed that the small animals take up into a hierarchy of higher taxa [28]. In 1772, Adanson
particles of carmin or indigo into vesicle-like structures, introduced the use of multiple characteristics for classi¢-
which he called stomach. He proposed the concept that cation. He recognized that di¡erent characteristics have
su¤ciently. The problem of the origin of bacteria and of ment, chemical features, and descent could only be an-
independent, distinct species was still not solved by 1850. swered in the future when new chemical methods became
Ferdinand Cohn (1828^1898) stressed that in the ¢eld of available [65,66,76]. From the beginning of his studies,
bacteriological systematics, one has to start at point zero Cohn was convinced that the kingdom of bacteria con-
[65,66]. His taxonomic studies were based on an excellent sisted of species with inherent characters. He defended
knowledge of the unicellular algae, lower fungi, protozoa, this concept against Theodor Billroth (1829^1894) and
and bacteria. He noticed that the cellular organization and many other contemporaries who believed that all spherical
other structural details of bacteria could not be resolved, bacterial forms and all rod-shaped bacterial forms each
even when the bacteria were observed with the strongest belong to only one species of plants and have `only one
oil-immersion objective of the microscope (the methods of form of life' (`eine einzige Lebensform') which can adapt
phase-contrast microscopy and staining of bacteria were to di¡erent conditions of the environment and change
still not discovered) [65,66]. Only a few characteristics their form accordingly (pleomorphy): Micro-, Meso-,
were available for classi¢cation, and it was not known Megacoccus and Micro-, Meso-, and Megabacteria. Bill-
whether they are stable and species-speci¢c stages of de- roth combined all genera proposed by Cohn in the poly-
C
Fig. 1. Di¡erent bacteria, drawn by Cohn. A: (Table V in [66]). 8) Cladothrix dichotoma, described on p. 185 in [66], similar to Scytonema, false
branching; 9) Bacillus anthracis, from blood of a cow which died from anthrax; 10) mobile bacteria with endospores from rennet ; 11) bacilli with endo-
spores from butyric acid fermentation; 12) Micrococcus and spores from rennet ; 13) Micrococcus bombycis from silkworm, sick from £accid disease.
B: (Table VI in [66]). 9, 10) Lamprocystis (Clathrocystis) roseopersicina ; 11) Chromatium (Monas) warmingii ; 12) Chromatium (Monas) okenii; 13) Chro-
matium vinosum (Monas vinosa); 14) Rhabdomonas rosea containing sulfur globules, pink colored; 15) Ophidomonas (Spirillum) sanguinea, large, red col-
ored with light-scattering granules (Thiospirillum jenense?); 16) Spirochaete Obermeieri, Borrelia recurrentis with red blood cells; 17) Bacillus ruber
Frank (p. 181 in [66]), red colored, growing on cooked rice; 18) Myxococcus (Micrococcus) fulvus, red colored colonies.
ment bacteriopurpurin and the bacterium Bacterium rubes- ilarity leaves room for genomic and phenotypic di¡erences
cens [92]. He thought that all the bacteria that contained due to the di¡erent life history of the strains, but simulta-
bacteriopurpurin but which had di¡erent shapes were neously allows the combination of these strains in a spe-
phases of one and the same organism (pleomorphism) cies, which has for practical purposes enough common
[93]. Cohn, Ehrenberg, Engelmann, Warming, N. Winog- features. There are several reasons for not changing the
radsky, and Zopf described many species of purple bacte- present classi¢cation of prokaryotes on the basis of a rig-
ria (the name was coined by Engelmann) mainly on the orous use of this species de¢nition: (i) not enough data on
basis of their morphology, pigmentation, physiology, and strain diversity and interspecies relationships are available,
cell inclusions (Fig. 1) [38,76,80,81]. (ii) di¡erent criteria have been applied to identify species,
An important achievement of Cohn was the species con- (iii) very closely related strains are for diagnostic purposes
cept, founded on the hypothesis that distinct species-spe- still separate species, e.g. in the group of enteric bacteria,
ci¢c populations have several inheritable characteristics in and (iv) evolutionary systematics, as proposed by C. Dar-
common, which di¡erentiate them from other species. The win, is the only way to come to a `true natural system' of
concept was solidi¢ed as soon as pure cultures of bacteria bacteria.
losophy of R. Descartes, believed in the abiogenetic way malcules. He found that the heating period required to
of spontaneous generation. The doctrine of spontaneous render an infusion sterile is variable, and he concluded
generation has long been considered as an inhibitor of that Needham's infusions were contaminated by air
scienti¢c progress. It will be shown here by a few examples [108]. Needham commented that in Spallanzani's experi-
that the controversial discussion on this theory became ments, the prolonged heating destroyed the vegetative
¢nally a driving force of scienti¢c progress because it ini- force and modi¢ed the air. In response to Needham's ob-
tiated numerous experiments and resulted in new concepts jections, Spallanzani repeated his experiments and con-
and experiments [27]. cluded that animalcules developed in £asks that were
The extensive studies on the anatomy of higher and corked, but not in hermetically sealed £asks that were
lower plants and animals in the 17th century revealed heated for 0.5^2 h. He also did experiments with £asks
that animals and plants developed from eggs and semen. having capillary necks to avoid diminishing the `elasticity
Francesco Redi (1626^1697) discovered that putrefying of the air', as accused by Needham. Two types of animal-
matter is not the material from which animals generate, cules were described : those of superior order, which were
but a substrate on which animals deposit their eggs. He easily destroyed in 30 s at 100³C, and the other exceed-
otherwise, the gas bubbles could transfer microorganisms. was prejudiced, decided the discussion in favor of Pasteur.
Theodor Schwann (1810^1882) designed an apparatus It was not seriously considered that Pasteur worked with
consisting of a £ask that contained an infusion sterilized yeast extract or other de¢ned media, while Pouchet used
by boiling. Air was conducted through a heated glass tube hay infusions. Pasteur refuted the doctrine of spontaneous
before reaching the infusion. Such £asks kept for 6 weeks generation not only because of the results of his steriliza-
did not show any growth of microorganisms, but after tion experiments, but also because of preconceived ideas
opening the £ask, the infusion became putrid. Schwann that speci¢c fermentations, such as butyric, alcoholic or
concluded that the germs or seeds of infusoria in the air lactic acid fermentation, are caused by speci¢c microor-
were destroyed by heat. In the same apparatus, the £asks ganisms even when no oxygen is present and because of
were ¢lled with boiled sugar solution and yeast. In £asks his anti-materialistic belief in a Creator God [63,64,104,
with unheated air, the sugar was degraded, alcohol was 114^117].
formed, and the yeast cells grew ([35], pp. 86^87). A new The heterogenists and others continued to carry out
principle of air sterilization was introduced by H. di¡erent types of experiments to prove or disprove spon-
Schro«der and T. von Dusch [111]. They ¢ltered air taneous generation [1,27,29,35,104]. Charlton Bastian
that hay infusion, which very often contains heat-resistant cyanobacteria, have a complex phylogenetic structure
spores, resists boiling. [122]. The three groups of organisms ^ eubacteria, arch-
If infusoria are not generated spontaneously from or- aebacteria, and eukaryotes ^ are now generally accepted as
ganic matter, how are they originated and propagated ? major phylogenetic branches of the tree of life. Woese and
After publication of Darwin's The Origin of Species in Fox [99] proposed the progenote as a primitive hypothet-
1859 and the increasing evidence of earlier periods of life ical ancestor of prokaryotes and eukaryotes. However, the
on earth, the concept that organisms share a common unraveling of the true evolutionary relationships of the
origin and subsequently diverged through time was slowly three kingdoms remains a matter of speculation and fur-
adopted by scientists. However, Darwinism revived the ther studies [123^126].
discussion on spontaneous generation, although it was re- Archaebacteria have, besides their own typical features,
stricted to the question of the beginning of life and the markers which are characteristic of eukaryotes or eubac-
origin of microorganisms. In France, Darwinian evolution teria [103,126,127]. It has been discussed whether they are
was regarded as a doctrine allied with the forces that polyphyletic and relatives of Gram-positive bacteria [103].
threatened church and state [104]. Ray Lankester in Eng- Some physiological attributes, e.g. molecules of the photo-
Yeast was considered by Berzelius as a catalyst, like plants by Jan Ingenhousz (1730^1799) and Nicolas Thëo-
platinum, which was not transformed during fermentation. dore de Saussure (1767^1845) [148^150]. The term auto-
Liebig postulated that the `ferment' is produced from trophy was introduced by Wilhelm Pfe¡er [7]. Ingenhousz
`Kleber' (gluten) by oxidation with the oxygen from water showed that plants in the presence of light absorb carbon
[136,137]. G.V.M. Fabbroni [141] suggested that the de- dioxide and liberate oxygen and that the CO2 is used for
composition of sugar during fermentation is caused, in nutrition [148,149]. Saussure determined quantitatively the
absence of oxygen, by a vegetative-albumenoid substance. increase of the plant dry weight and the decrease of CO2
Caniard de la Tour (1777^1859), Theodor A.H. during the day in correlation with the light intensity, and
Schwann (1810^1882) and Traugott Ku«tzing (1807^1893) he observed that during the night, oxygen is consumed
were the ¢rst to propose independently of each other that and CO2 is released [150]. Liebig, Boussinggault, and
alcoholic fermentation is a biological process and that Sachs studied the nutritional physiology of plants grown
yeast is a reproducing, living thing (sugar fungus, Saccha- in a pure mineral solution [19,151]. The term photosyn-
romyces) [142^144]. Schwann and Ku«tzing described yeast thesis for the light-induced assimilation of CO2 was coined
in detail. Liebig and Wo«hler anonymously published a late in the 19th century. Research on oxygenic (oxygen-
Cohn described the presence of hydrogen sul¢de in stag- into ammonia and other compounds and assimilate am-
nant water bodies and the formation and degradation of monia as nitrogen source [76].
sulfur droplets in Beggiatoa (Fig. 2). Erroneously he con-
cluded that Beggiatoa is responsible for the synthesis of 7.3.1. Bacteria as contagion
H2 S [66]. The oxidation of hydrogen sul¢de to sulfur and The process of putridity was more and more associated
sulfuric acid under microaerophilic conditions in Beggia- with the idea of sepsis as a cause of septicemia, pyemia,
toa was demonstrated by Winogradsky [158]. The reduc- and putrid infection. B. Gaspard administered putrid ma-
tion of sulfate to sul¢de by Bacterium desulfuricans was terial to experimental animals and observed the develop-
¢rst described by M. Beijerinck [159]. ment of symptoms. The nature of pyemia and septicemia,
In 1885, H. Hellriegel (1831^1895) and H. Wilfarth dis- however, remained a mystery [35]. The pathological e¡ects
covered the ¢xation of dinitrogen in root nodules of legu- of putrid infections on the cellular level were described by
minous plants, and they showed that the combined nitro- Virchow [167]. He and other scientists studied the e¡ect of
gen compounds formed in the nodules were supplied to dose on the symptoms of septic shock, intoxication, ab-
the plants. The causative bacteria were isolated and de- scesses, and cytopathic modi¢cations of tissues [36,166^
species causes a speci¢c infectious disease were performed infectious diseases. By repeated passages of pathogenic
by Robert Koch (1843^1910). The decision to select an- germs on arti¢cial media at high temperatures (42³C), in
thrax for the ¢rst series of experiments was fortunate be- non-host animals, or in speci¢c tissues, they obtained bac-
cause the infected tissues contain numerous bacilli (Bacil- teria with attenuated virulence. These attenuated cultures
lus anthracis). Koch isolated the bacteria from an animal were used to inoculate animals or humans. The vaccinated
that died of anthrax and set up cultures in a moist cham- individuals were shown to be resistant to the virulent
ber, where the growth, division, and sporulation of the strains of fowl cholera, anthrax, swine erysipelas, or rabies
bacilli were observed with the microscope and documented [183^186].
by microphotography, which was developed by Koch [12].
In the decisive experiment, it was shown that B. anthracis, 7.3.3. Disinfection
isolated from the diseased animal, and not Bacillus subtilis, The observation that carbolic acid inhibits growth of
caused anthrax in mice. Koch wrote to Cohn, who was at microorganisms and the formation of pus in wounds
this time an internationally recognized authority in bac- [187] and the numerous observations that microorganisms
teriology, that he would like to demonstrate his results in cause fermentation, putrefaction, and infections stimulated
1850, became a lecturer (auMerplanma«Miger Professor) on June 25, 1898 (Fig. 9). The details of his career have been
April 2, 1857, and an associate professor on July 30, 1859. described recently [79,196].
He married Pauline Reichenbach in 1866, and was ap- Cohn contributed to a broad ¢eld of topics in biology.
pointed full professor on April 17, 1872 (Fig. 5). In His reserve in self-representation and his modesty may be
1866, he founded the Institute of Plant Physiology and the reason why his name is at the present time much less
established a research group (Fig. 6). A new building for known than that of Koch and Pasteur. Cohn's major ¢eld
plant physiology, a herbarium, and a museum of botany during his studies in Breslau and Berlin was botany. In
were constructed in the botanical garden of the university Berlin he received a decisive intellectual stimulus for his
and were opened in 1888 (Figs. 7 and 8). Cohn died on subsequent research. His studies on plant cells and on the
Fig. 4. The main building of the university of Breslau (north side), alma mater Viadrina, founded by Leopold III, picture taken about 1867, published
in, see Fig. 3.
Fig. 5. Letter of appointment of Ferdinand Cohn as full professor. Text translated: Your Honorable is informed by order of the Mr. Minister of Intel-
lectual A¡airs, most devoted, that in instance of the philosophical faculty your Majesty, the emperor and king has signi¢ed his pleasure, to appoint you
as full professor in the philosophical faculty of this university. With my best congratulations, I send herewith the at April 17 by his majesty accom-
plished appointment, and request you, for the purpose of an imprint, to give the carrier 15 Sgr. You will receive a further order for the suitable in-
crease of your salary. To the royal professor of the university, Mr. Dr. Ferdinand Cohn, right honourable. Transcript of the order is herewith commu-
nicated to the philosophical faculty by order of the Mr. Minister of Intellectual A¡airs with regard to the proposal of the 13th March. The royal
curator of the university Con¢dential councillor and president.
Fig. 6. The only room with windows of the Institute of Plant Physiol-
ogy, founded in 1866 by Cohn in an old building of the university. On
the right side in the foreground the sea water aquarium, a kind of en-
richment culture, from which many bacteria and protozoa have been
isolated and described; in the background F. Cohn with his coworkers.
From [214].
Fig. 9. Gravesite of Ferdinand Cohn and his wife Pauline Cohn in the
Jewish Cemetery in Breslau (Wroclaw). The German and Polish texts of
the inscription on the tablet translate as follows: Ferdinand Julius
Cohn, 1828^1898. Botanist and Microbiologist, Pioneer in Modern Mi-
crobiology and the Taxonomy of Microorganisms, Founder of the Insti-
tute of Plant Physioloy of the University of Breslau (1866), Promoter of
Robert Koch. On the 100th Anniversary of his Death on June 25, 1998
in Breslau. Vereinigung fu«r Allgemeine und Angewandte Mikrobiologie,
Deutsche Gesellschaft fu«r Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, und Gesellschaft
fu«r Virologie, Muzeum Historyczne we Wroclawin.
avoid political activities, although as a student he partici- Sphaeroplea annulina. Monatsber. K. Akad. Wissensch. Berlin, pp.
335^351.
pated actively in the 1848 revolution in Berlin. His sus- ë ber Stephanosphaera pluvialis.
[23] Cohn, F. and Wichura, M. (1856) U
tained importance in biology was in two ¢elds: the sex- Acad. Caes. Leopold. Nova Acta 26, 3^31.
uality and development of lower plants and the concept [24] Cohn, F. (1855) U ë ber das Geschlecht der Algen. Jahrb. Schles. Ges.
that bacteria are organisms with distinct, heritable charac- Vaterl. Kultur 33, 95^105.
teristics. He proposed principles of bacterial taxonomy, [25] Cohn, F. (1856) Beobachtungen u«ber den Bau und die Fortp£anzung
von Volvox globator. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Bot.) 5, 323^332.
knowing that at his time the methodical means to elabo-
[26] Cohn, F. (1875) Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Gattung Volvox.
rate a modern taxonomy on a phylogenetic basis were not Beitr. Biol. P£anz. 1, 93^115.
available. Cohn discovered the development and heat re- [27] Farley, J. (1977) The Spontaneous Generation Controversy from
sistance of bacterial endospores. Descartes to Oparin. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
[28] Mayr, E. (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought. Harvard Uni-
versity Press, Cambridge, MA.
[29] Lechevalier, H.A. and Solotorovsky, M. (1965) Three Centuries of
Microbiology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
References
[54] Brefeld, O. (1872) Botanische Untersuchungen u«ber Schimmelpilze. [84] Cohn, F. (1866) U ë ber die Physiologie und Systematik der Oscillari-
Arthur Felix, Leipzig. neen und Florideen. Jahrb. Schles. Ges. Vaterl. Kultur 44, 134^139.
[55] Orlob, G.B. (1964) Vorstellungen u«ber die A ë tiologie in der Ge- [85] Cohn, F. (1867) Beitra«ge zur Physiologie der Phycochromaceen. M.
schichte der P£anzenkrankheiten. P£anzenschutz Nachr. Bayer 17, Schultze's Arch. Mikrosk. Anat. 3, 1^60.
185^272. [86] Cohn, F. (1879) U ë ber ein Thallophytensystem. Jahrb. Schles. Ges.
[56] Cohn, F. (1851) Die Entwicklungsgeschichte des Pilobolus crystalli- Vaterl. Kultur 57, 279^289.
nus. Acad. Caes. Leopold. Nova Acta 23, 493^536. [87] Hallier, E. (1868) Researches into the nature of vegetable parasitic
[57] Cohn, F. (1855) Empusa muscae und die Krankheit der Stuben£iegen. organisms. Med. Times Gaz. Lond. 2, 222^223.
Acad. Caes. Leopold. Nova Acta 25, 299^360. [88] de Bary, A. (1868) Zur Beurteilung der Pilzschriften des Herrn Hal-
[58] Persoon, C.H. (1801) Synopsis Methodica Fungorum. Go«ttingen. lier. Bot. Ztg. 26, 294^296.
[59] Fries, E. (1821^1832) Systema Mycologicum, Vol. 3. Uppsala. [89] Lister, J. (1872) On the germ theory of putrefaction and other fer-
[60] Brefeld, O. (1872^1908) Untersuchungen aus dem Gesamtgebiete der mentative changes. Nature, July 10 and 17.
Mykologie, Heft I^XIV. Felix, Leipzig. [90] Klebs, E. (1873) Beitra«ge zur Kenntnis der Micrococcen. Arch. Exp.
[61] Raulin, J. (1869) Chemical studies on growth. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. 11, Pathol. Pharmakol. 1, 31^64.
93^299. [91] Klebs, E. (1875) Beitra«ge zur Kenntnis der pathogenen Schistomy-
[62] Henle, J. (1840) Von den Miasmen und Contagionen, in: Pathologi- ceten. Arch. Exp. Pathol. Pharmakol. iv, 107, 207, 409, cited in
[112] Pouchet, F.A. (1859) Hëtërogënie ou Traitë de la Gënëration Sspon- [140] Bëchamp, A. (1868) Sur les granulations molëculaires des fermenta-
tanëe, Basë sur de Nouvelles Expëriences. Baillie©re, Paris. tions et des tissues des animaux. C.R. Acad. Sci. 66, 366; De l'or-
[113] Mi£et, D. (1883) Untersuchungen u«ber die in der Luft suspendierten igine et du dëveloppement des bactëries. C.R. Acad. Sci. 66, 859.
Bakterien. Beitr. Biol. P£anz. 3, 119^140. [141] Fabbroni, A. (1787) Dell'Arte de Fare il Vino. Florence.
[114] Pasteur, L. (1857) Mëmoire sur la fermentation appelëe lactique. [142] Cagniard-Latour, C. (1837) Mëmoire sur la fermentation vineuse.
C.R. Acad. Sci. 45, 913^916. Ann. Chim. Phys. 68, 206^222.
[115] Pasteur, L. (1860) Mëmoire sur la fermentation alcoolique. Ann. [143] Schwann, T. (1837) Vorla«u¢ge Mittheilung betre¡end Versuche u«ber
Chim. phys. 3e Ser. 48, 323^426. die Weinga«hrung und Fa«ulnis. Ann. Phys. Chem. 41, 184.
[116] Pasteur, L. (1876) Etudes sur la Bie©re, Ses Maladies, Causes qui les [144] Ku«tzing, F. (1837) Microscopische Untersuchungen u«ber die Hefe
Provoquent, Procëdë pour la Rendre Inaltërable avec une Thëorie und Essigmutter nebst mehreren andern dazu geho«rigen vegetabili-
Nouvelle de la Fermentation. Paris. schen Gebilden. J. Prakt. Chem. 11, 385^409.
[117] Pasteur, L. (1864) Mëmoire sur la fermentation acëtique. Ann. Sci. [145] Mitscherlich, E. (1841) U ë ber die chemische Zersetzung und Verbin-
Ec. Norm. Supër. 1, 113^158. dung vermittelst Contac-Substanzen. Ber. Verhandl. K. Preuss.
[118] Tyndall, J. (1881) Essays on the Floating Matter of the Air in Akad. Wiss. Berlin, pp. 379^396.
Relation to Putrefaction and Infection. London. [146] Traube, M. (1858) Theorie der Fermentwirkung. Berlin.
[119] Roberts, W. (1874) Studies on biogenesis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. [147] Buchner, E., Buchner, H. and Hahn, M. (1903) Die Zymasega«rung.
selles de malades atteints du cholëra et d'autres a¡ections. C.R. Soc. [198] Cohn, F. (1858) U ë ber die Wettersa«ule von Mangschu«tz. Jb. Schles.
Biol. 2e Sër. 1, 129. Ges. Vaterl. Kultur 36, 79^89.
[170] Bassi, A. (1837) Del Mal del Segno Calcinaccio o Moscardino, Ma- [199] Cohn, F. (1872) U ë ber den Brunnenfaden Crenothrix polyspora mit
lattia che A¥ige i Bacchi da Seta e sul Modo di Liberarne le Be- Bemerkungen u«ber die mikroskopische Analyse des Brunnenwass-
gattaje anche le piu© Infestate. Milan. ers. Beitr. Biol. P£anz. 1, 108^132.
[171] Obermeier, O. (1873) Vorkommen feinster, eine Eigenbewegung zei- [200] Cohn, F. (1876) U ë ber die in Schlesien im Getreide beobachteten
gender Fa«den im Blut von Recurrenskranken. Zbl. Med. Wissensch. Brandpilze. Jb. Schles. Ges. Vaterl. Kultur 54, 135^137.
XI, 10. [201] Cohn, F. (Ed.) Kryptogamen-Flora von Schlesien. Vol. 1: Stenzel,
[172] Rosenbach, F.J. (1884) Mikro-Organismen bei den Wund-Infek- K.G. (1877) Gefa«M-Kryptogamen, Limprecht, K.G. (1877) Laub-
tions-Krankheiten. J.F. Bergmann, Wiesbaden. und Lebermoose, Braun, A. (1877) Characeen. Vol. 2.1: Kirchner,
[173] Hallier, E. (1867) Das Cholera Contagium. Botanische Untersu- O. (1878) Algen. Vol. 3.1: Schro«ter, J. (1893^97) Pilze. Vol. 3.2:
chungen Aerzten und Naturforschern Mitgetheilt. Leipzig. Schro«ter, J. (1908) Pilze. J.U. Kern Verlag, Breslau.
[174] Hallier, E. (1869) Die Parasiten der Infectionskrankheiten. Zeitschr. [202] Cohn, F. (1851, 1853) Bericht u«ber die Entwicklung der Vegetation
Parasitenkd. Jena, 117, 291. in Schlesien. Jb. Schles. Ges. vaterl. Kultur. 29, 1^24, 53^76; 31,
[175] Koch, R. (1881) Zur Untersuchung von pathogenen Organismen. 113^151.
Mitt. Kais. Gesundheitsamt 1, 1^48. [203] Cohn, F. (1850) U ë ber Aldrovanda vesiculosa. Flora 33, 673^683.
ë ber die Bewegung der Bla«tter bei unseren einhei-