Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 2-THEORIES OF ETHICS
Chapter 2-THEORIES OF ETHICS
Chapter 2-THEORIES OF ETHICS
Learning objectives
- Assess the various roles of theories of ethics
- Identify key features of representative range of
theories of ethics
- Critically evaluate the applications of these theories
1
8/31/22
DISCUSSION
DISCUSSION
Case 1:
You are out on the ocean – your ship has sunk.
There are only 2 survivors, you and another person.
Both of you cling on to a piece of wood. It can hold
only one of you.
-What do you do?
-How does your decision change if the other person
if your best friend/wife?
2
8/31/22
DISCUSSION
Case 2:
You need to submit your course paper by tonight,
but you haven’t really got around the work. When
you meet your friend in the café this afternoon, you
see that he carries his report with him. He leaves for
the restroom, the report lies on the table.
-What do you do? Would you have a look at the
report?
-What if your friend offer you to read his paper?
DISCUSSION
Case 3:
You drove too fast – and in front of you is a police
control. The fine is $100, but the police officer hints
that he might be let you go if you pay a small ‘tip’
of $20.
-What do you do? Would you bribe the policeman?
-Why? Why not?
3
8/31/22
THEORIES OF ETHICS
ETHICAL EGOISM AND SUBJECTIVISM
4
8/31/22
THEORIES OF ETHICS
ETHICAL EGOISM AND SUBJECTIVISM
THEORIES OF ETHICS
ETHICAL EGOISM AND SUBJECTIVISM
10
5
8/31/22
THEORIES OF ETHICS
VIRTUE ETHICS
11
THEORIES OF ETHICS
DEONTOLOGICAL THEORIES
12
6
8/31/22
THEORIES OF ETHICS
CONSEQUENTIALIST THEORIES: EVALUATING CHOICES
IN TERMS OF THE OUTCOMES THEY BRING ABOUT
13
THEORIES OF ETHICS
JUSTICE AND RIGHTS-BASED THEORIES: EVALUATING
CHOICES IN TERMS OF THEIR SOCIAL IMPACT
RIGHTS
Ø The idea that there are some rights that people have
solely by virtue of their being human
14
7
8/31/22
THEORIES OF ETHICS
JUSTICE AND RIGHTS-BASED THEORIES: EVALUATING
CHOICES IN TERMS OF THEIR SOCIAL IMPACT
JUSTICE
15
THEORIES OF ETHICS
JUSTICE AND SENIOR MANAGERS' REMUNERATION
A common argument made in favour of senior managers being treated
differently from other organizational members is that they often have to
devote a greater proportion of their life to their job, can often run substantial
personal career risks depending on the kinds of decision they make, and by
their actions can often add - or subtract - a huge amount of value to (or from)
the organization. Hence, many private companies will pay their most senior
executives percentage salary increases well beyond those of other staff, while
public sector organizations may allow senior staff access to much more
generous benefits than other employees, including 'golden hello' and
'goodbye' starting and termination pay premiums, enhanced
pensions and privileged expense allowances.
How far is this compatible with principles of natural justice? How far can this
be justified in terms of equality, fairness or deservingness? How would you
present your position to a group of chief executives who have themselves
benefited from such arrangements and practices?
16
8
8/31/22
THEORIES OF ETHICS
CULTURAL RELATIVISM
17
THEORIES OF ETHICS
MAKING SENSE OF THEORY
18
9
8/31/22
THEORIES OF ETHICS
MAKING SENSE OF THEORY
19
THEORIES OF ETHICS
SUMMARY
20
10