Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ESSAY WRITING Arguing A Point
ESSAY WRITING Arguing A Point
Département d’Anglais
COURSE:
COMPREHENSION
LEVEL: L2
GROUPS:
1&2
TEACHER
Mrs. IDRES O.
Course : Essay Writing
Arguing a point
1. When you argue in writing, you do not necessarily fight with anyone. Before
developing an argument on paper, you must first develop it in your mind. Therefore,
you can say that argument is a thinking process, a reasoning process. You must have
a point of view, a position, a premise to start from, a logic proposition from which
inference is drawn. If your basic premise is unsound, illogical, wrong, your argument
will be faulty.
Example a: Major Premise: All Africans have a black complexion.
Minor premise: All Algerians are Africans.
Conclusion: All Algerians have a black complexion.
This is an argument based on a false premise (all Africans are not black); therefore,
the conclusion is false.
Example b: Major Premise: Any threat to public safety should be removed.
Minor premise: Guns threaten public safety.
Conclusion: Therefore, guns should be removed.
Most people would agree with the major premise. The disagreement could be over
the minor premise. Therefore, not everyone agrees with the conclusion.
2. In argumentation, more than in almost any other type of writing, the writer is
strongly involved with the reader. The writer wants to affect the audience in three
possible ways:
Change their attitude by getting them to understand a problem.
Change their behaviour by getting them to act.
Both
3. There are different ways to construct a logical argument:
Setting a problem
Discussing and arguing
Proposing a solution and arguing
Conclusion to the argument. This conclusion is very important as it is the
controlling idea of your essay.
Page 1 sur 7
Mrs. IDRES O.
Course : Essay Writing
When the controlling idea is at the end, the argument is said to be inductive;
turned around, with the conclusion stated at the beginning, the argument
would be deductive. Good arguments can be organized in one way or
another.
4. Arguments often end with a call for action, if the writer’s aim is to affect behaviour.
5. Argumentative texts defend implicitly or explicitly ideas or points of view. They have
two functions:
Polemical function: dismissing someone else’s point of view.
Persuasive function: changing someone else’s opinion.
6. Argumentative texts resort to three categories of reasoning:
Deductive Reasoning: drawing conclusions each time you say something.
Concessive Reasoning: making concessions to other people’s arguments, the
better to criticise them.
Reasoning by Analogy: making your arguments more concrete by comparing
situations.
Page 2 sur 7
Mrs. IDRES O.
Course : Essay Writing
Proponents of this idea state that it will save local cities and towns
money because libraries are expensive to maintain. They also believe it
will encourage more people to read because they won’t have to travel
to a library to get a book; they can simply click on what they want to
read and read it from wherever they are. They could also access more
materials because libraries won’t have to buy physical copies of books;
they can simply rent out as many digital copies as they need.
Page 3 sur 7
Mrs. IDRES O.
Course : Essay Writing
While replacing libraries with tablets may seem like a simple solution, it
would encourage people to spend even more time looking at digital
screens, despite the myriad issues surrounding them. It would also end
access to many of the benefits of libraries that people have come to rely
on. In many areas, libraries are such an important part of the
community network that they could never be replaced by a simple
object.
Analysis
Text outline:
§1. Introduction:
§2. Counter-argument:
Saving money
Easier reading
No need to go to a library
Access to more material
Providing jobs
(illustrations)
Page 5 sur 7
Mrs. IDRES O.