Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GROUP5_EXPERIMENT1_LAB REPORT
GROUP5_EXPERIMENT1_LAB REPORT
GROUP GROUP 5
GROUP MEMBER OOI KOH HUI (A20ET0362)
ERNY IZZATY BT MOHD NOR (A20ET0065)
NUR ZULAIKHA ADRIANA BINTI SHAHRULNIZAM
(A20ET0216)
MOHAMMAD ZARUL AZAM BIN TAJRI (A20ET0133)
EXPERIMENT EXPERIMENT 1
DATE SUBMISSION 22/5/2023
LECTURER DR. ASIAH NUSAIBAH BINTE MASRI
CONTENT PAGE
2 INTRODUCTION
• OBJECTIVES 2
• SCOPE OF EXPERIMENT
4 METHODOLOGY 6-8
5 RESULT 9-22
6 DISCUSSION 22-23
7 CONCLUSION 24
8 REFERENCES 25
9 APPENDICS 26
1.0 ABSTRACT
The iodine clock reaction is a classic chemical clock demonstration experiment that
demonstrates chemical kinetics in action. In this experiment, we will investigate the reaction
kinetics and rate laws of the "iodine clock reaction" in this experiment. This happens at a rate
that can be easily measured at room temperature. A chemical reaction's rate is determined by
the appearance of a product or the removal of a reactant. In this experiment, the effects of
reactant concentration and reaction temperature on reaction rate are investigated. As the
reaction progresses, the color of the solution changes from colorless to a deep blue complex
color. The reaction orders and rate constant of the iodine reaction are computed. The first
experiment aimed to identify the reaction order with respect to persulfate, as well as the
relationship between persulfate concentration and reaction pace, by altering persulfate
concentration while holding the iodide concentration and reaction temperature constant. The
second set of experiments aims to identify the reaction order in regard to the iodide ion, as well
as the relationship between the iodide ion concentration and reaction rate, by altering the iodide
ion concentration while maintaining the persulfate concentration and reaction temperature
constant. The third experiment was carried out to explore the link between reaction rate and
reaction temperature, as well as to determine the reaction's Arrhenius constant. Based on the
findings of the experiments, the activation energy and Arrhenius constant of the iodine reaction
are determined.
1
2.0 INTRODUCTION
The reaction of iodine, a halogen element known for its unique properties and
adaptability, is one fascinating area of research. Our experimental investigation into iodine
reactions will be thoroughly documented and analyzed in this laboratory report with the
intention of revealing the fundamental principles and mechanisms governing this fascinating
chemical process.
Iodine, with its profound violet tone and exceptional scent, has long captivated
physicists and analysts. Its reactivity, especially when exposed to various chemical species,
results in a wide variety of intriguing reactions that call for in-depth investigation. We can gain
valuable insights into the behavior of iodine and its interactions with various substances
through carefully controlled experiments.
Our research center examination centers around two essential goals. First and foremost,
we want to observe and comprehend how iodine reacts with various chemical compounds, with
a focus on the development of intricate iodine-containing species. Second, we want to find out
what factors, such as temperature, concentration, and catalysts, affect the rate and extent of
these reactions.
By diving into the iodine response try, we expect to procure significant information
about the key standards of substance energy, thermodynamics, and atomic cooperations.
Moreover, this examination holds guarantee for giving functional bits of knowledge into the
possible utilizations of iodine responses in fields like drugs, materials science, and ecological
examination.
2
3.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
The “clock reaction” is a reaction famous for its dramatic colorless-to-blue color change,
and is often used in chemistry courses to explore the rate at which reactions take place. The
color change occurs when I2 reacts with starch to form a dark blue iodine or starch complex.
In this experiment, iodine ions are oxidized to iodine and starch, which forms a characteristic
dark blue color with iodine, is added as an indicator to signal when a specified amount of iodine
has been formed. The time needed for the reaction to occur, from the time of mixing to the time
when the blue color suddenly appears, is measured and used to calculate the rate of reaction.
In general, the iodine is formed in a slow or rate-determining step, but the reaction of iodine
with sodium thiosulfate is extremely fast. This can be represented by the equation below:
Based on the chemical equations shown, iodine can be restored to its original ionic state
where from reaction 1, the produced iodine is reacted with thiosulfate as shown in chemical
equation of reaction 2. As the result of the chemical reaction, tetrathionate ions and solution of
excess iodine from reaction 2 are formed. The excess iodine becomes liquid form when all the
thiosulphate ions are entirely dissolved and used. To estimate the rate of iodine formation, the
time for thiosulfate ions to fully react is considered in this experiment. As a result, the iodine
is consumed as fast as it is formed. As soon as all of the thiosulfate ions have reacted, however,
iodine begins to accumulate. The presence of iodine is then detected by the sudden appearance
of the dark blue color of the starch–iodine complex, which can be represented by below
equation:
At constant temperature and ionic strength, the rate of reaction can be expressed as the change
in concentration of a reagent or product over the change in time and can be equated to the rate
law expression:
3
𝑑[𝑆2 𝑂82− ] 𝑑[𝐼 − ]
𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = − = = 𝑘[𝑆2 𝑂82− ]𝑚 [𝐼 − ]𝑛
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑡
∆[𝑆2 𝑂82− ] ∆[𝐼 − ]
≈ − =
∆𝑡 ∆𝑡
where,
The rate law expression shown aboce had expressed the initial change in concentration of
S2O82- ions), and Δt, the time elapsed during the change, as well as the initial concentration of
S2O82- and I- ions.
The variation in concentration of persulfate and the variation in concentration of iodine are
basically given by:
∆[𝑆2 𝑂82− ] = [𝑆2 𝑂82− ]𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 − [𝑆2 𝑂82− ]𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 = 0 − [𝑆2 𝑂82− ]𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 = −[𝑆2 𝑂82− ]𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑒𝑑
∆[[𝐼2 ] 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐼2
𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = =
∆𝑡 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑥 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒
where,
1 2− 2−
∆[[𝐼2 ] 2 𝑥 volume of 𝑆2 𝑂3 added x concentration of 𝑆2 𝑂3
𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = =
∆𝑡 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑥 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒
4
Hence, the order of the reaction with respect to the persulfate and the order of the
reaction with respect with iodine will be determined by using the initial rate method. Initial rate
method is the method of initial rates allows the values of these reaction orders to be found by
running the reaction multiple times under controlled conditions and measuring the rate of the
reaction in each case (Libretexts, 2021). All variables are held constant from one run to the
next, except for the concentration of one reactant. The rate law of the equation can be written
as:
Hence, by taking the natural of log of both sides, the equation can be written as:
where, 𝑛 ln[𝐼 − ] = constant. By comparing the above equation with the linear equation, y =
mx+c, the slope of the best fit line of the graph that plotted by ln rate versus ln S2O82- will be
the order of the reaction with respect to persulfate.
Besides that, in order to investigate the effect of temperature on the reaction rate, the
different temperature start from 35 ▫C to 60 ▫C with interval range of 5▫C will be used in the
experiment. The reaction rate of different temperature can be calculated by using the Arrhenius
equation. Arrhenius equation is an equation that describe the relation between the rate of
reaction and temperature for many physical and chemical reactions (Ashter, 2014). Arrhenius
equation can be represent as below:
−𝐸𝑎
𝑘 = 𝐴 exp( )
𝑅𝑇
where,
Hence, by put the natural of log at the both sides of the equation, the Arrhenius equation
can be linearised into this form:
−𝐸𝑎
ln 𝑘 = + ln 𝐴
𝑅𝑇
5
Thus, a graph of ln k versus 1/T will be plotted and the value of Ea and ln A can be calculated
by using the slope and y-intercept of the graph.
4.0 METHODOLOGY
Experimental procedures for the first experiment are described according to Table 1 and Table
2. The first experiment must be conducted at similar and constant reaction temperature.
1. All the beakers and flasks are cleaned up with distilled water.
2. For the data set in Table 1, a conical flask containing K2S2O8 solution should be soaked
in a water bath at a temperature around 35oC - 40oC. The K2S2O8 solution should be
allowed to reach a similar temperature as the water bath.
3. Another conical flask should be filled with 30mL of KI solution. Into this flask,
Na2S2O3 solution, starch solution, and distilled water (according to Table 1) should be
added. This mixture represents the reaction medium.
4. The reaction medium should be soaked in the same water bath. The reaction medium
should be stirred with a magnetic stirrer until it reaches the temperature of the water
bath.
5. Once the K2S2O8 solution and the reaction medium have reached the same temperature
as the water bath, the K2S2O8 solution should be pipetted into the reaction medium.
The stopwatch should be started at the first drop of K2S2O8 solution into the reaction
medium.
6. The timing should be stopped when the reaction medium turns into a deep blue complex
color.
6
Part II: Determination of reaction order with respect to iodide ion (n)
The experiment was repeated for the set of data in the table 2, for different amount of KI
solution and distilled water, where as the amount of K2S2O8 solution is kept constant.
The experiment was repeated for the set of data in the Table 3 at different reaction temperature.
Table 1. Preparation of solution to determine the reaction order with respect to persulfate ion
(m)
Table 1. Preparation of solution to determine the reaction order with respect to iodide ion (n)
7
Table 3. Preparation of solutions to determine the activation energy (Ea) and Arrhenius
constant (k)
All the results collected from the experiment were shown on result section.
8
5.0 RESULT
Table 5.1: Preparation of solution to determine the reaction order with respect to
persulfate ion (m)
Conical
Exp. run #1 #2 #3 #4 #5
Flask
Starch solution
5 5 5 5 5
(mL)
Distilled water
Reaction 50 45 40 25 15
(mL)
Medium
Na2S2O3 sol.
10 10 10 10 10
(mL)
KI sol. (mL) 30 30 30 30 30
K2S2O8 sol.
In pipette 5 10 15 30 40
(mL)
Total (ml) 100 100 100 100 100
Time (min) 2.28 1.51 1.16 0.36 0.28
Initial moles Na2S2O3
0.000395294 0.000395294 0.000395294 0.000395294 0.000395294
(mol)
Initial moles K2S2O8 (mol) 0.000462411 0.000924823 0.001387234 0.002774469 0.003699292
moles I2 reacted (mol) 0.000197647 0.000197647 0.000197647 0.000197647 0.000197647
moles K2S2O8 reacted
0.000197647 0.000197647 0.000197647 0.000197647 0.000197647
(mol)
moles K2S2O8 remained
0.000264764 0.000727176 0.001189587 0.002576822 0.003501645
(mol)
final conc. Of K2S2O8
0.002647643 0.007271758 0.011895873 0.025768218 0.035016447
(mol/L)
change in conc. K2S2O8
0.001976472 0.001976472 0.001976472 0.001976472 0.001976472
(mol/L)
rate,-rA (mol/L.min) 0.000866874 0.001308922 0.001703855 0.0054902 0.007058829
ln(-rA) -7.05061725 -6.63855145 -6.37486181 -5.20479056 -4.95347613
ln(S2O8 2-) -5.93408552 -4.92375723 -4.43156377 -3.65861342 -3.3519374
9
5.1.1 Calculation: Preparation of solutions to determine the reaction order with respect
to persulfate ion (m)
6.25 𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙 1𝐿
Initial moles of Na2S2O3 = × × × 10 mL = 0.000395294 mol
𝐿 158.11 𝑔 1000 𝑚𝐿
25 𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙 1𝐿
Initial moles of K2S2O8 = × × × 5 mL = 0.000462411 mol
𝐿 270.322 𝑔 1000 𝑚𝐿
• Reaction (1):
• Reaction (2):
= 0.000197647 mol
• From Reaction (1):
Moles of 𝐾2𝑆2𝑂8 reacted = mol of I2 reacted
= 0.000197647 mol
= 0.000264764 mol
• Concentration
10
𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑜𝑓 K2S2O8 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑
Final concentration of 𝐾2𝑆2𝑂8 =
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
0.000264764 mol 1000 mL
= ×
100 𝑚𝐿 1𝐿
= 0.002647643 mol/L
• Rate of reaction
𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 K2S2O8
Rate, -rA =
𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒
0.001976472 mol/L
= = 0.000866874 mol/L
2.28 𝑚𝑖𝑛
• Natural Log
ln(-rA) = ln (0.000866874)
= -7.05061725
= ln (0.002647643)
= -5.93408552
The calculation step shown in above were repeated for Set 2 until Set 5.
𝐼𝑛 (−𝑟𝐴) = ln 𝑘 + 𝑚 𝑙𝑛 𝐶𝐴 + 𝑛 ln 𝐶𝐵
For this part, the preparation of solutions was done to determine the reaction order with
respect to persulfate ion (m) where the concentration of iodide is constant.
𝐼𝑛 (−𝑟𝐴) = ln 𝑘 + 𝑚 𝑙𝑛 𝐶𝐴 + 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡
Hence, an equation can be obtained to plot a graph which can use y = mx+c to find out the
order of the reaction.
𝐼𝑛 (−𝑟𝐴) = 𝑚 ln 𝐶𝐴 + 𝐴
Where,
𝐴 = 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 = ln 𝑘 + 𝑛 𝑙𝑛𝐶𝐵
11
𝐼𝑛 (𝐶𝐴) = ln [𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐾2𝑆2𝑂8]
0
-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
-1
-2
-3
𝐼𝑛 (−𝑟𝐴)
-4
-5
y = 0.8526x - 2.2419
-6
-7
-8
ln(S2O8 2-)
Where,
A = – 2.2419 ; m = 0.8526
12
5.2 Preparation of solutions to determine the reaction order with respect to iodide ion.
Table 5.2.1: Preparation of solution to determine the reaction order with respect to
iodide ion (n).
Table 5.2.2: Data Calculated from Calculation for Determining the Reaction Order,
Rate Constant, Activation Energy and Arrhenius Constant of Iodine Reaction.
13
Change in Concentration 0.003953 0.003953 0.003953 0.003953 0.003953
of KI (mol/L)
Rate (mol/L.min) 0.0006376 0.001275 0.002502 0.006816 0.0107
ln (-rA) -7.3578 -6.6648 -5.9907 -4.9885 -4.5375
ln (I-) -4.5002 -3.6431 -3.1886 -2.4487 -2.1499
5.2.2 Calculation
For Set 1
6.25𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙 1𝐿
𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆2 𝑂3 = 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥10𝑚𝑙
𝐿 158.11𝑔 1000𝑚𝑙
= 0.0003953 𝑚𝑜𝑙
25𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙 1𝐿
𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐾2 𝑆2 𝑂8 = 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥25𝑚𝑙
𝐿 270.322𝑔 1000𝑚𝑙
= 0.002312 𝑚𝑜𝑙
50𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑙 1𝐿
𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐾𝐼 = 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 5𝑚𝑙
𝐿 166.0028𝑔 1000𝑚𝑙
= 0.001506 𝑚𝑜𝑙
Based on reaction 1, 1 mol of K2S2O8 produces 1 mol of I2, hence in reaction 2, 1 mol of I2
will react with 2 mol of Na2S2O3, so number of moles of K2S2O8 reacted is:
1
𝑀𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓𝐾2 𝑆2 𝑂8 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 = 𝑥 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆2 𝑂3
2
1
= 𝑥 0.0003953 𝑚𝑜𝑙
2
= 0.0001977 𝑚𝑜𝑙
14
𝑀𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐾𝐼 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 = 2 𝑥 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝐾2 𝑆2 𝑂8 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑
= 2 𝑥 0.0001977 𝑚𝑜𝑙
= 0.0003953 𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝑀𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐾𝐼 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 − 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑
= 0.001506 − 0.0003953
= 0.0011107 𝑚𝑜𝑙
Concentration:
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐾𝐼 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠
𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐾𝐼 =
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
0.0011107𝑚𝑜𝑙 1000𝑚𝑙
= 𝑥
100𝑚𝑙 1𝐿
= 0.011107 𝑚𝑜𝑙/𝐿
𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝐾𝐼 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑
𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐾𝐼 =
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
0.0003953 𝑚𝑜𝑙 1000𝑚𝑙
= 𝑥
100𝑚𝑙 𝐿
= 0.003953𝑚𝑜𝑙/𝐿
Rate of Reaction:
𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐾𝐼
−𝑟𝐴 =
𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒
0.003953𝑚𝑜𝑙 1
= 𝑥
𝐿 6.2𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑚𝑜𝑙
= 0.0006376
𝐿. 𝑚𝑖𝑛
Natural Log:
ln( − 𝑟𝐴 ) = ln (0.0006376)
= −7.3578
Then, the calculation step shown in above were repeated for Set 2 until Set 5.
15
5.2.3 Graph of ln (-rA) against ln (I-)
Since in table 2, the preparation of solutions was done to determine the reaction order with
respect to iodide ion (n), so the concentration of persulfate ion is constant. Hence, the equation
can be further simplifying to
ln 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 𝑛 ln 𝐶𝐵 + 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡
𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑐
ln(−𝑟𝐴 ) = 𝑛 ln 𝐶𝐵 + 𝐴
Wher4e,
ln(-rA) vs ln (I-)
0
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
-1
-2
-3
ln(-rA)
y = 1.2241x - 2.0078 -4
-5
-6
-7
-8
ln(I-)
16
• The reaction order with respect to iodide ion (n) is 1.2241.
𝐶𝐴 = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐾2 𝑆2 𝑂8
= 0.002312 − 0.0001977)
𝑚𝑜𝑙
= 0.0021143
𝐿
𝐶𝐵 = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐾𝐼
𝑚𝑜𝑙
= 0.011107
𝐿
−𝑟𝐴 = 0.0006376𝑚𝑜𝑙/𝐿
• Reaction order
m = 0.8526
n =1.2241
= 0.00211430.8526 𝑥 0.0111071.2241
= 0.000021235
• Arrhenius Constant, k
17
5.3 Dependence of Reaction Rate on the Reaction Temperature
Table 5.3.1 : Preparation of solutions to determine the activation energy (Ea) and
Arrhenius constant (k).
Experiment 1 2 3 4 5
Starch (C H O ) (mL) 6 10 5 5 5 5 5 5
Na S O (mL)
2 2 3 10 10 10 10 10
KI (mL) 5 5 5 5 5
K S O (mL)
2 2 8 25 25 25 25 25
18
Final concentration KI, CB (10 ) -2
- - 1.11 1.11 1.11
M
C C (10 ) mol /L
A
m
B
n -4 2 2
- - 1.5086 1.5086 1.5086
1/T (10 ) K -3 -1
- - 0.00310 0.00320
0.00314
10𝑚𝐿 0.0397𝑚𝑜𝑙 1𝐿
= 1
| 𝐿 | 1000𝑀𝐿
-4
= 3.97 X 10 mol
25𝑔/𝐿
Concentration of K2S2O8 = 𝑀𝑊𝑔/𝑚𝑜𝑙
25𝑔/𝐿
= 270.34𝑔/𝑚𝑜𝑙
25𝑚𝐿 0.0924𝑚𝑜𝑙 1𝐿
= 1
| 𝑙
| 1000𝑚𝐿
-3
= 2.31 X 10 mol
19
Concentration of KI = 50 g/LMW g/mol
= 50 g/L166 g/mol
= 0.3012mol/L (0.3012M)
-3
= 1.51 x 10 mol
Moles of K2S2O8 and KI reacted can referred to sample calculation in 4.2.1 and 4.2.2
= 2.11 x 10-2 M
= 1.11 x 10-2 M
3.98𝑥10−4𝑚𝑜𝑙
-rA = moles of I2Total volume x Time = 0.1 𝐿 𝑥13.14
20
CAmCBn = (2.11𝑥10 − 2)0.8526 (1.11𝑥10−2 )1.2241
= 1.5086 X 10−4
k = -rA / CAmCBn
= 2.0071 L/mol.min
= 0.6967
Ea = 0.0011 J/mol
ln A =0.0033
21
A = 1.007627 x 1010
Hence, the activation energy, Ea is 0.0011 J/mol and Arrhenius constant, A is 1.007627 x 1010
6.0 DISCUSSION
Figure 5.1 depicts a graph of ln (-rA) vs ln [𝑆2 𝑂82−]. The slope of the best fit line is
0.8526, indicating the value of the persulfate reaction order (m) if the iodide concentration was
held constant. The concentration of 𝑆2 𝑂82− is proportional to the rate of reaction, according to
the graph. The rate of reaction increases as the concentration of 𝑆2 𝑂82− increases. As a result, as
the concentration of a reactant grows, the time required for the reaction to occur reduces,
causing the rate of reaction to increase due to the increased chance of molecule collision during
the reaction period. According to Table 5.1, the time required for the mixed solution to react
with potassium persulfate ( 𝐾2 𝑆2 𝑂8 ) decreased from 2.28 minutes to 0.28 minutes. However,
the higher the concentration of potassium persulfate (𝐾2 𝑆2 𝑂8 ) will cause its concentration to
rise, increasing the pace of reaction gradually.
Using the Arrhenius equation to compute the value of activation energy, Ea, and the
Arrhenius constant, A, the equation obtained is ln k= -0.00013(1/T) +0.0033. . As a result, Ea
is 0.0011 J/mol and the y-intercept that represents the veluae of A is 1.007627 x 1010
liter/mol.min. According to Table 5.3, when the temperature rises, the reactants' molecules
obtain more kinetic energy in order to achieve the lowest activation energy and collide with
one another, causing them to flow faster. In this experiment, the rate of reaction increases as
the temperature rises.
A few mistakes were made during the experiment, which resulted in varied outcomes.
First and foremost, it is critical to select an adequate instrument for measuring the volume of
solutions. Following that, parallax should be avoided when measuring the volume of solution.
Besides that, the measuring cylinder and beaker should be set on a flat surface, and the volume
should be read at the bottom of the meniscus to avoid errors in the volume of chemical that fills
22
the beaker. Then, we must be patient and focused while waiting for the solutions to change to
dark blue, since the color changes in a matter of seconds.
Aside from that, another inaccuracy that may affect the accuracy of the amount obtained
may be caused by the number of decimal places employed during the computation part. To
avoid this issue, the significant figure should be standardized throughout the calculation.
Finally, the presence of wind in the lab might affect both the temperature of the water bath and
the solution in the beakers since the fans and windows do not close properly. As a result, the
experiment must be carried out in a contained atmosphere, with all fans and windows turned
off. Lastly, only 3 reading was recorded for Table 5.3 due to some mistake. To avoid this, make
sure to use the correct chemical substances during the experiment.
23
7.0 CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the reaction order, m, obtained is 0.8526, and the reaction order, n,
obtained is 1.2241. At the same time, the overall order of the reaction determined in this
experiment is the first order of reaction. At different temperatures, the minimum activation
energy, Ea, is 0.0011 J/mol, and the Arrhenius constant, A, is 1.007627 x 1010 liter/mol.min.
The sole manipulated variable in this experiment was the amount of 𝐾2 𝑆2 𝑂8 , and we may
deduce that the more volume of 𝐾2 𝑆2 𝑂8 added, the less time it took for the reaction to change
color. The graph indicates an overall increasing positive trend, with the time required for color
change increasing as the volume of 𝐾2 𝑆2 𝑂8 , KI, and temperature rose in each experiment.
Finally, some parameters must not be overlooked, such as the volume of reactants employed,
the recorded time, and the color changes of the solution during the experiment, in order to
acquire more precise results and avoid mistakes.
24
8.0 REFERENCES
BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4557-3172-5.00006-2
https://www.bellevuecollege.edu/wp-
content/uploads/sites/140/2014/06/Kinetics_Iodine_Clock_Rxn_Reportsheets.pdf
25
9.0 APPENDICS
Experiment
Result for Table 1
Experiment
Result for Table 2
26