Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Get Practical Leadership in Community Colleges: Navigating Today's Challenges 1st Edition George R. Boggs PDF Full Chapter
Get Practical Leadership in Community Colleges: Navigating Today's Challenges 1st Edition George R. Boggs PDF Full Chapter
Get Practical Leadership in Community Colleges: Navigating Today's Challenges 1st Edition George R. Boggs PDF Full Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-
leadership-studies-1st-edition-george-r-goethals/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/primary-mathematics-3a-hoerst/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-role-of-community-colleges-in-
skills-development-lessons-from-the-canadian-experience-for-
developing-asia-1st-edition-asian-development-bank/
Tribal Development in India Challenges and Prospects in
Tribal Education 1st Edition R R Patil
https://ebookmeta.com/product/tribal-development-in-india-
challenges-and-prospects-in-tribal-education-1st-edition-r-r-
patil/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/tribal-development-in-india-
challenges-and-prospects-in-tribal-education-1st-edition-r-r-
patil-2/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-blueprint-6-practical-steps-to-
lift-your-leadership-to-new-heights-1st-edition-douglas-r-conant/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/arrive-and-thrive-7-impactful-
practices-for-women-navigating-leadership-1st-edition-susan-
mackenty-brady/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/true-north-leading-authentically-
in-today-s-workplace-emerging-leader-edition-3rd-edition-bill-
george-zach-clayton/
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
efforts have been made to solve this question. The estimate of the
Bureau of Statistics of Massachusetts is $754.[234] The Charity
Organization Society of Buffalo regards $634 a year as the “lowest
tolerable budget which will allow the bare decencies of life for a
family of five.”[235] A special committee of the New York State
Conference of Charities and Corrections in 1907 made the following
estimates as to the income necessary for a family of five persons in
New York City.
“$600–$700 is wholly inadequate to maintain a proper standard
of living, and no self-respecting family should be asked or expected
to live on such an income.”
“With an income of between $700–$800 a family can barely
support itself, provided it is subject to no extraordinary expenditures
by reason of sickness, death, or other untoward circumstances. Such
a family can live without charitable assistance through exceptional
management and in the absence of emergencies.”
“$825 is sufficient for the average family of five individuals,
comprising the father, mother, and three children under 14 years of
age to maintain a fairly proper standard of living in the Borough of
Manhattan.”
Mr. Streightoff summarizes the evidence in the following words:
“It is, then, conservative to set $650 as the extreme low limit of the
Living Wage in cities of the North, East, and West. Probably $600 is
high enough for the cities of the South. At this wage there can be no
saving, and a minimum of pleasure.”[236]
The close correspondence of these various estimates gives them a
high degree of credibility. If we fix these standards in mind, and then
look back over the wage scales given on the foregoing pages, we are
struck with the utter inadequacy of the annual incomes of the
foreign-born to meet even these minimum requirements of decency.
It is obvious that an enormous number of immigrant families, if
dependent solely on the earnings of the head of the family, would fall
far below any of these standards, and that many of them, even when
adding to their resources by the labors of wife and children, and the
contributions of boarders, cannot possibly bring the total income up
to the minimum limit. Even the average income in many occupations
is far below this minimum, and it must be considered that while an
average indicates that there are some above, there must also be many
below, the line. What must be the condition of those below! The
average family income of the foreign-born studied in the
Immigration Commission’s investigation of the manufacturing and
mining industries was $704. Mr. Frederic Almy states that 96 per
cent of the Poles under investigation in Buffalo earn less by $110
than the $634 per year which was set as the “lowest tolerable
budget.”[237]
A vast amount of information covering a number of miscellaneous
aspects of human life, which fall under the general head of the
standard of living, is furnished by the Immigration Commission, in
its report on the manufacturing and mining industries. Some of the
most important of these facts are summarized in the following tables.
First, as to the situation of young children in the homes of
immigrants.
PER CENT OF CHILDREN 6 AND UNDER 16 YEARS OF AGE[238]
Male Female
At At At At At At
Home School Work Home School Work
Native-born white of native
father 5.4 90.9 3.6 6.9 90.5 2.6
Native-born of foreign father 10.2 83.9 5.9 12.6 83.5 3.9
Foreign-born 13.2 77.0 9.9 19.1 73.6 7.3
237. The Survey, Feb. 4, 1911, p. 767.
238. Rept. Imm. Com., Imms. in Mfg. and Min., Abs., pp. 194–195.
Among the following races the following per cent of foreign-born
male children of the specified age were at work: German, 13.9; south
Italian, 13.3; Lithuanian, 14.3; Portuguese, 15.7; Ruthenian, 14.6;
Scotch, 19.0; Syrian, 22.6.
The following table, showing the per cent of literacy of the
employees studied in these industries, is based on information for
500,329 employees, and hence has a remarkable trustworthiness:
LITERACY OF EMPLOYEES IN MINING AND MANUFACTURING[239]
NATIVITY MALES FEMALES
Per Cent who Per Cent who
Read Read and Write Read Read and Write
Native-born white of native father 98.2 97.9 98.8 98.4
Native-born of foreign father 99.0 98.7 99.0 98.8
Foreign-born 85.6 83.6 90.8 89.2
239. Ibid., pp. 162–165.
Foreign-born male employees of the following races have the
following literacy, as shown by the per cent who can read and write:
south Italian, 67.6; Macedonian, 67.1; Portuguese, 46.1; Ruthenian,
63.6; Servian, 69.5; Turkish, 54.1.
From the foregoing table it appears that in respect to literacy the
native-born employees of foreign fathers are superior to the native-
born whites of native fathers, and that the foreign-born females are
superior to the foreign-born males.
The important matter of ability to speak English is forcibly
portrayed in the following table:
PER CENT OF FOREIGN-BORN EMPLOYEES (EXCLUSIVE OF THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING
RACES) WHO SPEAK ENGLISH[240]
Nativity Male Female Total
Total 55.6 38.6 53.2
Bulgarian 20.3 80.0 (only 5) 20.6
Danish 96.5 98.3 96.6
German 87.5 80.2 86.8
Greek 33.5 12.3 31.5
Hebrew, Russian 74.7 75.7 75.0
Herzegovinian 14.6 14.6
Italian, south 48.7 25.8 44.4
Magyar 46.4 24.0 45.2
Norwegian 96.9 91.8 96.5
Polish 43.5 15.5 39.1
Portuguese 45.2 27.0 37.8
Slovak 55.6 26.6 55.1
Slovenian 51.7 30.3 50.9
Swedish 94.7 94.2 94.7
240. Rept. Imm. Com., Imms. in Mfg. and Min., Abs., p. 198.
It is thus apparent how large a proportion of our foreign-born
laborers have not even taken the first essential step toward
assimilation. This evil is, of course, practically overcome in the
second generation. Almost all of the native-born persons of foreign
fathers, six years of age or over, speak English, though some races
show from 6 to 8 per cent who do not.
The percentage who can speak English naturally increases with the
length of residence in the United States, until a percentage of 83.1 is
reached for all foreign-born employees who have been in the United
States ten years or more. But even in this group a very low
percentage is found among the Cuban and Spanish cigar makers, of
whom almost three fifths are unable to speak the English language.
The age of the immigrant at the time of arriving in the United
States has a great deal to do with the ability to speak English. The
percentage of those who were under fourteen when they arrived who
can speak English is nearly twice as large as that of those who were
fourteen or over. The reasons for this are the greater adaptability of
the younger immigrants, and their greater opportunities of going to
school. The relatively poor showing of the females is probably due to
their greater segregation, which prevents them from coming in touch
with Americans or older immigrants of other races.
One of the special reports of the Immigration Commission deals
with the children of immigrants in schools and brings out some very
significant facts. Practically all of the information was secured in
December, 1908. Naturally this investigation involved a study of the
children of native-born fathers also. A general investigation was
made in the public schools of thirty cities, including the first twenty
cities in point of population, as shown by the census of 1900, with
the exception of Washington, D.C., Louisville, Ky., and Jersey City,
N.J. An investigation was also carried on in regard to parochial
schools in twenty-four cities, and an investigation of the students in
seventy-seven institutions of higher learning. In addition to this
general investigation, an intensive investigation was made in twelve
cities, including seven cities not in the previous list, making a total of
thirty-seven cities in which public schools were studied. The total
number of public school pupils for whom information was secured
was 1,815,217. Thus the investigation was a very inclusive one, and
the results may be taken as representative of educational conditions
in the cities of the entire country.
Of the total number of public school children studied in the thirty-
seven cities, 766,727 were of native-born fathers, and 1,048,490 of
foreign-born fathers. The children of native-born white fathers
constituted 39.5 per cent of the total, while among the children of
foreign-born fathers there were the following percentages of the total
number: Hebrews, 17.6; Germans, 11.6; Italians (north and south),
6.4; total, native-born father, 42.2 per cent; total, foreign-born
father, 57.8 per cent.
The different cities show a marked difference in the proportion of
children who come from foreign-born fathers, as the following table
will show:
“In only 7 of the 37 cities is the proportion of pupils who are children
of native-born white fathers as high as 60 per cent.” Four cities have
less than 30 per cent. The children of German foreign-born fathers
are most numerous in Milwaukee, Detroit, Buffalo, Cleveland,
Meriden, Chicago, Cincinnati, and St. Louis; those of foreign-born
Russian Hebrew fathers in Chelsea, New York, Boston, Philadelphia,
Newark, and Baltimore, those of foreign-born south Italian fathers in
Providence, Newark, New York, Yonkers, Buffalo, and Boston.
A smaller proportion of the total number of children of foreign-
born fathers are in the higher grades of the public schools than of the
children of native-born white fathers, as the following table shows:
PER CENT OF PUPILS OF SPECIFIED NATIVITY IN THE SPECIFIED GRADES
Grade Native-born White Father Foreign-born Father
Kindergarten 4.3 4.4
Primary grades 52.1 57.6
Grammar grades 34.5 33.3
High school 9.1 4.7