SUPERVISED INDUSTRY LEARNING OR ON-THE-JOB TRAINING

EVALUATION FORM
Trainee’s Name: Junnelle Dave C. Ramos
Qualification: CSS NC II Period of Training: May 6-31, 2024
Direction: This form seeks your objective, honest, and fair evaluation of the
Student-trainee’s performance. Please indicate your rating on the different
items by checking the appropriate number using the rating scale indicated
herewith.
5-Outstanding 2-Unsatisfactory
4-Very Satisfactory 1-Poor
3-Satisfactory
Item
Question Ratings
No.

Trainer-Trainee 1 2 3 4 5 NA

1 Does the trainee demonstrate an

understanding of technical √
concepts and procedures?
2 Does the trainee apply theoretical
knowledge effectively in practical √
situations?
3 Does the trainee demonstrate
improvement in technical skills over √
time?
4 Does the trainee demonstrate
attention to detail and precision in √
work?
5 Does the trainee communicate
technical information effectively to √
colleagues?
Comments/Suggestions:
The trainee shows improvements in skills over the time of the training.

Trainee: Junnelle Dave C. Ramos Trainer: Mar C. Yun

Signature over printed Name Signature over printed Name
 SUPERVISED INDUSTRY LEARNING OR ON-THE-JOB TRAINING
EVALUATION FORM
Trainee’s Name: John Christaph D. Bitanga
Qualification: CSS NC II Period of Training: May 6-31, 2024
Direction: This form seeks your objective, honest, and fair evaluation of the
Student-trainee’s performance. Please indicate your rating on the different
items by checking the appropriate number using the rating scale indicated
herewith.
5-Outstanding 2-Unsatisfactory
4-Very Satisfactory 1-Poor
3-Satisfactory
Item
Question Ratings
No.

Trainer-Trainee 1 2 3 4 5 NA

1 Does the trainee demonstrate an

understanding of technical √
concepts and procedures?
2 Does the trainee apply theoretical
knowledge effectively in practical √
situations?
3 Does the trainee demonstrate
improvement in technical skills over √
time?
4 Does the trainee demonstrate
attention to detail and precision in √
work?
5 Does the trainee communicate
technical information effectively to √
colleagues?
Comments/Suggestions:
The trainee performs excellent work.

Trainee: John Christaph D. Bitanga Trainer: Mar C. Yun

Signature over printed Name Signature over printed Name
 SUPERVISED INDUSTRY LEARNING OR ON-THE-JOB TRAINING
EVALUATION FORM
Trainee’s Name: Kevin Ermilou C. Lopez
Qualification: CSS NC II Period of Training: May 6-31, 2024
Direction: This form seeks your objective, honest, and fair evaluation of the
Student-trainee’s performance. Please indicate your rating on the different
items by checking the appropriate number using the rating scale indicated
herewith.
5-Outstanding 2-Unsatisfactory
4-Very Satisfactory 1-Poor
3-Satisfactory
Item
Question Ratings
No.

Trainer-Trainee 1 2 3 4 5 NA

1 Does the trainee demonstrate an

understanding of technical √
concepts and procedures?
2 Does the trainee apply theoretical
knowledge effectively in practical √
situations?
3 Does the trainee demonstrate
improvement in technical skills over √
time?
4 Does the trainee demonstrate
attention to detail and precision in √
work?
5 Does the trainee communicate
technical information effectively to √
colleagues?
Comments/Suggestions:
The trainee needs to improve more on the technical concept and
procedures.

Trainee: Kevin Ermilou C. Lopez Trainer: Mar C. Yun

Signature over printed Name Signature over printed Name
 Trainer-Trainee Evaluation Average
Does the trainee demonstrate an
understanding of technical concepts and 4
procedures?
Does the trainee apply theoretical knowledge
4
effectively in practical situations?
Does the trainee demonstrate improvement in
4.6
technical skills over time?
Does the trainee demonstrate attention to
4.6
detail and precision in work?
Does the trainee communicate technical
4.6
information effectively to colleagues?
General Average 4.36

Average Ratings

RANGE:
0.00 – 1.49 = Poor/ Unsatisfactory
1.50 – 2.49 = Fair / Satisfactory
2.50 – 3.49 = Good / Adequate
3.50 – 4.49 = Very Good / Very Satisfactory
4.50 – 5.0 = Outstanding

GENERAL INTERPRETATION:

With a general average of 4.36, this indicates that the trainees have
demonstrated a solid understanding of technical concepts and procedures
and effectively applied theoretical knowledge in practical situations, each
scoring a 4.0. These are very good scores, indicating a strong foundational
knowledge and practical application.

The trainees excel in technical skills improvement, attention to detail,

precision in work, and communication of technical information, each
scoring 4.6. These scores indicate a high level of competence and a strong
ability to grow, pay attention to details, and communicate effectively.
RECOMMENDATION:
The evaluation revealed that certain trainees needed to work on proving they
understood technical concepts and procedures as well as how to apply
theoretical knowledge in practical situations. Consequently, I suggest that
the trainees should get better at showcasing their comprehension of
technical concepts and procedures as well as applying their theoretical
knowledge in practical situations.