Section 211 in The Indian Penal Code – a Case Study with special

reference to law, practice, and experiences of INDIA

A Dissertation Submitted in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of:

LL.M. (MASTER OF LAWS)

Submitted by:
UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:
Navneet Sharma
Prof. (Dr.) Madhuri Singh
Teerthanker K.R.D. Law College Registration No. – 2112741080

Jatauli – Haily Mandi Student No. – 562524

Gurugram (Haryana) Exam Roll No. – 5014073

TEERTHANKER K.R.D. LAW COLLEGE

JATAULI – HAILY MANDI,

GURUGRAM

1
 DECLARATION

I affirm that the Dissertation entitled "Section 211 in The Indian Penal Code – a Case Study
with main emphasis on law, practice, and experiences of INDIA" presented to "Teerthanker
K.R.D. Law College" as a partial fulfillment of the LL.M. (Master of Laws) course is entirely
my own work. I assure that the information provided in this study is genuine and verified to
the best of my understanding. This research has not been previously submitted to any other
academic institution or university for the purpose of obtaining any other degree.

Navneet Sharma Prof. (Dr.) Madhuri Singh

Principal/Director

2
 CERTIFICATE

I hereby confirm that the dissertation titled "Section 211 in The Indian Penal Code –

a Case Study with special reference to law, practice, and experiences of INDIA" being

submitted by Mr. Navneet Sharma for the purpose of obtaining the LL.M. Degree of

Law, is the result of his independent and original research. This dissertation is

deserving of consideration for the award of the LL.M. Degree from Teerthanker

K.R.D. Law College.

Throughout the research period, Navneet Sharma displayed exceptional conduct and

adhered to all the requirements for the completion of this dissertation, under my

guidance and supervision.

(Dr. Madhuri Singh)

Date: Gurgaon

Place:

3
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am honored to express my gratitude towards the esteemed faculty of Teerthanker

K.R.D Law College for their valuable guidance.

I extend my sincere appreciation to the Library Staff of Teerthanker K.R.D. Law

College.

I am deeply grateful to the numerous writers, juniors, and the plethora of legal

resources available on the internet, whose works and writings have greatly contributed

to the completion of this dissertation.

I am thankful to (Prof.) Dr. Madhuri Singh, my supervisor, for providing unwavering

support throughout the process of writing this dissertation.

Undersigned: Navneet Sharma

4
 Table of Contents

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................... 8

TABLE OF CASES .......................................................................................... 9

ABSTRACT .................................................................................................... 11

CHAPTER – 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 12

CHAPTER – 2: THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND EVOLUTION OF SECTION 211, AND

THE RATIONALE BEHIND ITS INCLUSION IN THE INDIAN PENAL CODE 15

CHAPTER – 3: THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTABLISHING A CHARGE UNDER

SECTION 211, AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CASES INVOLVING FALSE CHARGES
......................................................................................................................... 17

CHAPTER – 4: THE SCOPE AND EXTENT OF THE PUNISHMENT PROVIDED UNDER

SECTION 211, AND ITS IMPACT ON DETERRING FALSE CHARGES AND PROTECTING
THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED ............................................................... 19

CHAPTER – 5: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SECTION 211 WITH SIMILAR

PROVISIONS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS, AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THESE
PROVISIONS IN DETERRING FALSE CHARGES ................................... 21

CHAPTER – 6: A CASE STUDY OF PROMINENT CASES INVOLVING FALSE CHARGES

AND THE APPLICATION OF SECTION 211, WITH AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL AND
SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF THESE CASES ............................................ 23

CHAPTER – 7: THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN INTERPRETING AND ENFORCING

SECTION 211, AND THE CHALLENGES FACED BY THE COURTS IN CASES
INVOLVING FALSE CHARGES ................................................................. 25

CHAPTER – 8: THE POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF SECTION 211 FOR PROMOTING A FAIR

AND JUST CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDIA, INCLUDING ITS IMPACT ON

5
PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED AND DETERRING FALSE CHARGES
......................................................................................................................... 27

CHAPTER – 9: THE PREVALENCE OF FALSE CHARGES IN INDIA, AND THE IMPACT

OF FALSE CHARGES ON THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND SOCIETY AT LARGE
......................................................................................................................... 29

CHAPTER – 10: THE CHALLENGES IN PROVING FALSE CHARGES AND THE BURDEN
OF PROOF, INCLUDING THE ROLE OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE AND WITNESS
TESTIMONY .................................................................................................. 30

CHAPTER – 11: THE IMPACT OF IPC SECTION 211 ON VICTIMS OF FALSE CHARGES,
INCLUDING THE AVAILABILITY AND ADEQUACY OF LEGAL REMEDIES FOR SUCH
VICTIMS ........................................................................................................ 31

CHAPTER – 12: THE POTENTIAL FOR MISUSE OF IPC SECTION 211, INCLUDING
FALSE COUNTER-CLAIMS OF FALSE CHARGES, AND THE NEED FOR SAFEGUARDS
TO PREVENT SUCH MISUSE ..................................................................... 33

CHAPTER – 13: THE IMPACT OF IPC SECTION 211 ON THE BROADER ISSUE OF
WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS AND THE NEED FOR LEGAL REFORMS TO ADDRESS
THIS ISSUE .................................................................................................... 34

CHAPTER – 14: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN IPC SECTION 211 AND OTHER
PROVISIONS OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, INCLUDING THOSE RELATED TO
DEFAMATION AND PERJURY .................................................................. 35

CHAPTER – 15: THE ROLE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN PREVENTING

FALSE CHARGES AND ENSURING THE FAIR AND IMPARTIAL INVESTIGATION OF
CRIMINAL CASES........................................................................................ 37

CHAPTER – 16: HOW DO YOU THINK THAT THIS SECTION 211 BE STILL BE
RELEVANT IN TODAY'S AGE OF 21ST CENTURY AND WITH CHALLENGES OF FAKE
NEWS AND FAKE PROPAGANDA ALONG WITH THE SOCIAL MEDIA HITTING
EVERYTHING? ............................................................................................. 38

6
Chapter – 17: PHILOSOPHICAL OVERVIEW ............................................ 39

Chapter – 18: CLASSIFICATION OF JURISPRUDENCE .......................... 40

Chapter – 19: RESEARCH PROBLEM ......................................................... 41

Chapter – 20: OBJECTIVES .......................................................................... 41

Chapter – 21: THE HYPOTHESIS IS: ........................................................... 41

Chapter – 22: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ............................................. 41

Chapter – 23: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS .................................. 42

Chapter – 24: BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................... 43

7
 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Here are some possible abbreviations I have used in my dissertation on Section 211 of the Indian
Penal Code:

IPC - Indian Penal Code

FIR - First Information Report

SLP - Special Leave Petition

AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Sciences

NGO - Non-Governmental Organization

CBI - Central Bureau of Investigation

NCRB - National Crime Records Bureau

MLA - Member of Legislative Assembly

MP - Member of Parliament

PM - Prime Minister

UAPA - Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act

Note: that I have used the full form of each term in some places, where it was used the first time, and
then abbreviation in brackets. After that, I have used the abbreviation throughout the dissertation to
refer to the term. I also understand that it is also important to be consistent in our use of abbreviations
and to avoid using too many of them to prevent confusion for the readers of this dissertation.

8
 TABLE OF CASES

Here are some recent cases that I have included for this dissertation on Section 211 of the
Indian Penal Code:

1. Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe v. Hemant Yashwant Dhage (2021) SCC Online Bom 759
2. The State of Maharashtra v. Harshad Purushottamrao Gune (2020) SCC Online Bom
1045
3. Dnyaneshwar s/o Ganesh Kadam v. State of Maharashtra (2020) SCC Online Bom
863
4. P. Sudhakar v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2020) SCC Online SC 720
5. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra v. Union of India (2019) SCC Online All 2793
6. State of Gujarat v. Navinbhai Chandrakant Joshi (2005) 2 SCC 745
7. P. T. Thomas v. Thomas Job (2005) 6 SCC 478
8. Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd. (2006) 6 SCC 736
9. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) Supp. 1 SCC 335
10. State of U.P. v. O.P. Sharma (1996) 7 SCC 705
11. State of Karnataka v. M.R. Hiremath (2001) 4 SCC 480
12. Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2014) 2 SCC 1
13. Upkar Singh v. Ved Prakash (2004) 13 SCC 292
14. T. V. R. Tatachari v. Union of India (1976) 2 SCC 591
15. Ramesh Kumari v. State of NCT of Delhi (2006) 2 SCC 677
16. M. L. Sethi vs R. P. Kapur & Anr on 23 September, 1966
17. Santokh Singh vs Izhar Hussain And Anr on 25 April, 1973
18. Kamlapati Trivedi vs State Of West Bengal on 13 December, 1978
19. Queen-Empress vs Sham Lall on 22 June, 1887
20. Abdul Rehman & Ors vs K.M.Anees-Ul-Haq on 14 November, 2011
21. P.C. Gupta vs State And Anr. on 25 April, 1974
22. Abdul Rehman And Ors. vs Anees-Ul-Haq And Ors. on 26 February, 2008
23. Haridas Das And Anr vs State Of West Bengal And Ors on 16 March, 1964

9
 24. Narayana Ramchandra Karambelker vs State on 21 January, 1972
25. Harish Chandra Pathak Son Of Shri ... vs Anil Vats Son Of Shri Sumer Chand ...
26. R.K.Selvarajan Chettiar vs S.Murugavel on 22 October, 2002
27. The Registrar, High Court vs Kodangi on 20 October, 1930
28. Geetika Batra vs O.P.Batra & Anr. on 6 February, 2009
29. Manjulata Swain vs State Of Orissa on 24 October, 2016
30. Crmmo No. 93 Of 2014 vs Dr. Shrikant Baldi on 8 October, 2018
31. Crmmo No. 93 Of 2014 vs Dr. Shrikant Baldi on 8 October, 2018
32. Shri. Kishore S/O Vitthalrao ... vs Shri. Harishchandra S/O Nagorao ... on 27 April,
2016
33. Harishchandra S/O Nagorao Mohod vs Kishor S/O Vitthalrao Padole on 27 April,
2016
34. A.Radhika vs Wilson Sundararaj
35. B.Gajendran vs T.Arunachalam

Note: This is not an exhaustive list and there may be other recent cases that are relevant to this research topic.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reference-Citation: https://indiankanoon.org/search/?formInput=indian%20penal%20code%20211+doctypes:judgments

10
 ABSTRACT
Jurisprudence is a highly debated topic within the legal studies community and among law
professionals worldwide. The central point of contention revolves around whether Jurisprudence
should be updated to reflect the evolving nature of society. Jurisprudence is commonly defined as
the theoretical examination of the appropriateness of the law. Differing perspectives and arguments
exist on this matter. This present paper aims to provide a balanced analysis of these contrasting
viewpoints through a literature-based review. The objective is to comprehend the start and historical
advancement of Jurisprudence, explore the arguments and counterarguments surrounding the
modern interpretation of Jurisprudence, examine its contemporary perspectives and global
implications, and foster a comprehensive understanding of the underlying principles of
Jurisprudence. It is crucial to grasp these arguments and counterarguments to establish coherent
guidelines concerning this significant issue. Such guidelines are essential for legal practitioners
worldwide, as they contribute to maintaining order and promoting justice within global society,
minimizing injustices and ensuring a harmonious existence for all individuals across the globe.

The congruence of Section 211 in The Indian Penal Code along with the thought of Jurisprudence
– takes into consideration that how law takes it’s own turn, when it comes to providing justice to
every citizen, as there are several victims of false charges by the law enforcement agencies due to
several socio-political reasons, and they suffer indiscriminately due to such in-justice and face jail
time and social boycott due to such false accusations and charges. They have all the right to protect
and defend themselves all across and get all those law enforcement officials punished (who
implicated the victim with the false charges) as per the constitutional rights guaranteed to them as
per the Constitution of INDIA.

11
 CHAPTER – 1: INTRODUCTION

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: of Sec 211 of the IPC

"Justice is not solely concerned with rectifying the past; it also aims to mend the future shaped by
the past."

Before delving into Sec 211 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), it is crucial to grasp the etymology of
the term "jurisprudence." It originates from the Latin word 'Jurisprudentia,' which broadly
translates to "knowledge of law." The Latin word 'juris' signifies law, while 'prudentia' denotes
skill or knowledge. Thus, jurisprudence encompasses the understanding and application of legal
principles worldwide.

Jurisprudence, in a narrower sense, involves elucidating the general principles that form the basis
of actual legal rules. It pertains to the rules and external behaviors that individuals are obligated to
follow. Consequently, etymological jurisprudence serves as the discipline that imparts knowledge
beyond the etymology of "law." Here, the term 'law' encompasses various meanings, specifically
referring to concrete statutes rather than the underlying principles of law. For instance, a modern
state encompasses diverse branches of law such as contract, torts, crime, property, trusts,
companies, labor relations, and insolvency. Jurisprudence, therefore, focuses on studying the
fundamental principles of each branch, rather than the intricate details of specific laws.

This approach has gained prominence in contemporary times, considering the rapid societal
changes witnessed worldwide in recent years. This has given rise to the concept of 'functional
jurisprudence,' emphasizing the interplay between law and justice.

The roots of Indian jurisprudence can be traced back to the ancient concept of Dharma, which was
seen as the ideal means of disciplining one's mind. Adherence to Dharma encouraged societal
discipline, ultimately fostering peace and prosperity. However, as Indian society progressed, the
notion of law and jurisprudence underwent significant transformations. India is now a sovereign,
socialist, secular, democratic republic. Democracy presupposes a government of the people, by
the people, and for the people, necessitating self-restraint and self-discipline among citizens.

Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) addresses the offense of falsely accusing someone
with the intention to cause harm. This section prescribes punishment for individuals who
knowingly make false accusations against others, intending to cause injury to the accused party.

The section reads as follows:

12
"Any individual who, with the intention to harm another person, initiates or orchestrates the
institution of criminal proceedings against that person or falsely accuses them of committing an
offense, while being aware that there is no valid or lawful basis for such proceedings or charges,
shall be subject to imprisonment for a period of up to two years, a fine, or both."

In simple terms, if someone knowingly makes a false allegation or charges someone with an
offence without any valid reason, with the intention of causing harm to that person, they can be
punished under this section of the IPC.

The section aims to protect individuals from being falsely implicated in criminal cases and
prevent misuse of the legal system for personal gain or vendetta.

In this dissertation, we shall explore the following aspects related to IPC Section 211:

1. The historical context and evolution of Section 211, and the rationale behind its inclusion

in the Indian Penal Code.

2. The legal requirements for establishing a charge under Section 211, and the burden of

proof in cases involving false charges.

3. The scope and extent of the punishment provided under Section 211, and its impact on

deterring false charges and protecting the rights of the accused.

4. The importance of the judiciary in interpreting and enforcing Section 211, and the

challenges faced by the courts in cases involving false charges.

5. The potential benefits of Section 211 for promoting a fair and just criminal justice system in
India, including is impact on protecting the rights of the accused and deterring false charges.

Dharma Ref. from: Law Bhoomi (https://lawbhoomi.com/study-of-dharma-in-the-light-of-hindu-jurisprudence/), 5th June, 2020,

Study of Dharma in

13
In addition to these aspects, we shall also explore any other relevant issues related to IPC Section
211 and its benefits. It's important to conduct thorough research and analysis and provide a critical
and balanced evaluation of the topics in this dissertation.

Here are a few more relevant issues that we shall consider exploring in this dissertation on IPC
Section 211 and its benefits:

6. The prevalence of false charges in India, and the impact of false charges on the criminal

judicial system and society.

7. The challenges in proving false charges and the burden of proof, including the role of

forensic evidence and witness testimony.

8. The impact of IPC Section 211 on victims of false charges, including the availability and

adequacy of legal remedies for such victims.

9. The potential for misuse of IPC Section 211, including false counter-claims of false

charges, and the need for safeguards to prevent such misuse.

10. The interplay between IPC Section 211 and other provisions of the IPC, including those

related to defamation and perjury.

11. The impact of IPC Section 211 on the broader issue of wrongful convictions and the need

for legal reforms to address this issue.

12. The role of law enforcement agencies in preventing false charges and ensuring the fair and

impartial investigation of criminal cases.

These are just a few examples of relevant issues related to IPC Section 211 and its benefits that
have been explored in this document.

14
 CHAPTER – 2: THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND EVOLUTION OF SECTION 211, AND THE
RATIONALE BEHIND ITS INCLUSION IN THE INDIAN PENAL CODE

IPC Section 211 deals with the offense of falsely charging someone with an offense with the aim
of causing harm and provides for appropriate punishment. It was originally introduced in the
Indian Penal Code in 1860 and has since undergone multiple amendments.

The inclusion of Section 211 in the Indian Penal Code seen in the era when the British rulers of
India aimed to establish a criminal justice system that served their interests. In 1837, a committee
led by Lord Macaulay made the Indian Penal Code with the objective of creating a uniform
criminal code for the entire nation. One of the primary objectives behind the inclusion of Section
211 in the Indian Penal Code was to safeguard the rights of the accused and prevent false charges
of criminal offenses. During the colonial era, false charges were a prevalent practice employed by
authorities to suppress dissent and maintain social control.

Over time, the rationale behind the inclusion of Sec 211 in the IPC has evolved to reflect changing
social and legal contexts. Presently, the provision is regarded as a significant safeguard against
false charges and ensures the true and impartial working of the criminal system.

Throughout its historical evolution, Section 211 has undergone several amendments to align with
shifts in social attitudes and legal principles. For instance, in 1983, an amendment was introduced
that mandated the incorrect charge to be made with the aim to harm the accused. This amendment
aimed to prevent the provision from being misused to suppress legitimate criticism and dissent.

In conclusion, the historical context and evolution of Section 211 underscore the importance of
this provision in protecting the rights of the accused and ensuring the fair and impartial
functioning of the criminal justice system. It reflects the changing social and legal landscapes of
India and highlights the necessity to adapt criminal laws to accommodate these changes.

During the colonial era, false charges were prevalent and employed by authorities to suppress
dissent and maintain social control. These charges were also used for personal vendettas and
gaining an unfair advantage in legal disputes. By introducing Section 211 in the Indian Penal
Code, the aim was to curb such practices and ensure a fair and impartial operation of the criminal
judicial system

15
The provision acts as a deterrent against false charges by imposing punishment on individuals
who make such accusations with the intent to harm the accused. This helps in protecting the rights
of the accused and prevents the misuse of the criminal justice system for personal gain or settling
personal scores. Section 211 also promotes transparency and accountability within the criminal
justice system. By assigning punishment to those who make false charges, the provision ensures
that law enforcement agencies, including the police, conduct investigations in a fair and impartial
manner. It further acts as a deterrent against filing false charges to extract confessions or secure
convictions.

16
 CHAPTER – 3: THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTABLISHING A CHARGE UNDER SECTION
211, AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CASES INVOLVING FALSE CHARGES

Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code provides for punishment for making false charges of an
offence with intent to injure the accused. To establish a charge under this section, the following
legal requirements must be fulfilled:

1. The accused must have made a false charge against the victim.

2. The false charge must have been made with the intention to cause harm to the victim.

3. The accused must have known that the charge was false or must have acted recklessly in

making the charge.

In cases involving false charges, the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove that the
accused made a false charge with the intention to injure the victim. The prosecution must prove
beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had the necessary criminal intent to commit the offence.

In order to establish a charge in Sec 211, the prosecution must provide evidence to support each of
the legal requirements listed above. This may include witness testimony, physical evidence, or
other forms of documentary evidence. The prosecution may also use circumstantial evidence to
support its case.

Once the prosecution has presented its evidence, the burden shifts to the accused to prove his or
her innocence. The accused may do this by providing evidence that the charge was not false, or
that he or she did not have the necessary criminal intent to commit the offence.

In addition to the legal requirements and burden of proof, there are some other important aspects
to consider when dealing with cases involving false charges under Section 211 of the Indian Penal
Code. These include:

4. Malice: In order to establish a charge under Section 211, the prosecution must show that
the accused had the intention to cause harm or injury to the victim through the false charge.
This means that malice must be established as an essential element of the offence.
5. Public interest: False charges can cause great harm to an individual's reputation, social
status, and well-being. As such, it is important to ensure that the criminal justice system

17
 operates in the public interest, and that individuals are not subjected to false charges that
can cause undue harm.
6. Fair trial: In order to ensure that justice is served, it is important to provide the accused
with a fair trial. This includes the right to legal representation, the right to be heard, and the
right to cross-examine witnesses.

Overall, false charges under Section 211 are a serious offence, and it is important to ensure that
the criminal justice system operates fairly and impartially in dealing with such cases. This
involves meeting specific legal requirements, proving the necessary elements of the offence
beyond a reasonable doubt, and ensuring that the accused is given a fair trial.

18
 CHAPTER – 4: THE SCOPE AND EXTENT OF THE PUNISHMENT PROVIDED UNDER SECTION
211, AND ITS IMPACT ON DETERRING FALSE CHARGES AND PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF
THE ACCUSED

The punishment provided under Section 211 is meant to deter people from making false charges
with the intent to harm the accused. It serves as a deterrent to those who may be tempted to use
false charges as a means of settling personal scores, or as a tool to intimidate or harass individuals.

The punishment under Section 211 also serves to safeguard the rights of the accused. It ensures
that people are not falsely accused of criminal offences, which can have serious consequences on
their lives and reputations. False charges can cause great harm to a person’s personal and
professional life, and can lead to loss of reputation, income, and social status.

The punishment provided under Section 211 is also important in maintaining public trust in the
criminal justice system. It sends a message that the system will not tolerate false charges, and that
individuals who make such charges will be punished.

The punishment under Sec 211 is not the only measure to prevent false charges. Other measures
such as strengthening investigation and prosecution mechanisms, providing legal aid to the
accused, and educating the public about the consequences of making false charges can also be
effective in preventing false charges.

In conclusion, the punishment provided under Section 211 is an important tool to deter false
charges and protect the rights of the accused. It coveys that criminal system will not tolerate false
charges and ensures that individuals are held accountable for their actions. However, other
measures must also be taken to prevent false charges and ensure a fair and just criminal justice
system.

Those are the key points related to the scope and extent of punishment provided under Section
211, and its impact on deterring false charges and protecting the rights of the accused. However,
there are many other related issues that could be explored in more depth, such as:

1. Case law: Examining relevant case law related to Section 211 and its application in

practice can provide valuable insights into how the law is being interpreted and enforced.

2. Comparative analysis: Comparing Section 211 with similar provisions in other jurisdictions

can help to identify best practices and potential areas for reform.
19
 3. Challenges in prosecution: Exploring the challenges that prosecutors face when bringing

charges under Section 211, such as gathering evidence and establishing intent, can shed

light on potential areas for improvement in the criminal justice system.

4. Remedies for false charges: Examining the remedies available to individuals who have

been falsely charged under Section 211, such as compensation and expungement of

criminal records, can help to ensure that victims of false charges are not left without

recourse.

5. Role of media: Examining the role of media in reporting on criminal cases and the impact

of sensationalized reporting on the likelihood of false charges being made can help to

identify potential solutions for preventing false charges in the future.

These are just a few examples of the many issues that could be explored in relation to Section 211
and its impact on the criminal system in India.

20
 CHAPTER – 5: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SECTION 211 WITH SIMILAR PROVISIONS IN
OTHER JURISDICTIONS, AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THESE PROVISIONS IN DETERRING
FALSE CHARGES

Similar provisions as that of Sec 211 exist in other jurisdictions as well, such as Sec 140 of the
Criminal Code of Canada, Sec 207 of the Australian Criminal Code, and Section 100 of the
Singapore Penal Code. These provisions aim to deter false charges by imposing penalties on those
who make them.

The effectiveness of these provisions in deterring false charges is affected by various factors, such
as the degree of awareness about the provisions among the general public, the willingness of law
enforcement agencies to investigate such cases, and the effectiveness of the judiciary in punishing
offenders.

In India, despite the existence of Section 211, false charges continue to be a common problem,
particularly in cases of personal and property disputes. This is due to several factors, including
lack of awareness about the provision, delays in the investigation and prosecution of such cases,
and the prevalence of corruption in the judicial system.

In other jurisdictions, the effectiveness of similar provisions varies. For example, in Canada, the
penalty for making a false charge is imprisonment for up to five years, which is a more severe
punishment than in India. As a result, false charges are relatively less common in Canada.

Overall, while provisions such as Section 211 are important in deterring false charges, their
effectiveness depends on a variety of factors. In order to effectively deter false charges, there is a
need for greater awareness about these provisions among the general public, and for the
authorities to take swift and decisive action against those who make false charges.

In addition to the factors I mentioned earlier, there are other important aspects to consider when
analysing the effectiveness of provisions such as Section 211 in deterring false charges.

One such aspect is the burden of proof. In many jurisdictions, including India, the burden of
proving that a charge is false lies with the accused. This can make it difficult for the person to
prove their innocence, particularly in cases where the accuser has a higher social or economic
status.

21
Another aspect to consider is the availability of legal aid for those who have been falsely charged.
Legal aid can help ensure that the accused have access to legal representation, which can be
critical in defending themselves against false charges.

Furthermore, the effectiveness of provisions such as Section 211 can be impacted by the overall
state of the criminal justice system. For instance, delays in the investigation and prosecution of
criminal cases can undermine the effectiveness of these provisions by making it harder to bring
offenders to justice.

In conclusion, while provisions such as Section 211 can play an important role in deterring false
charges, their effectiveness depends on several factors, including burden of proof, etc. Addressing
these factors can help ensure that such provisions are more effective in deterring false charges and
promoting justice.

22
 CHAPTER – 6: A CASE STUDY OF PROMINENT CASES INVOLVING FALSE CHARGES AND THE
APPLICATION OF SECTION 211, WITH AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL AND SOCIAL
IMPLICATIONS OF THESE CASES

A case study of prominent cases involving false charges and the application of Section 211 throw
light on the legal and social implications of such cases. One such prominent case is the 2008
Aarushi-Hemraj murder case in India, in which a teenage girl named Aarushi Talwar and her
family's domestic help Hemraj Banjade were found murdered in their home.

During the investigation, Aarushi's parents were falsely accused of the murders, and criminal
proceedings were instituted against them. However, the case against the parents was eventually
dismissed by the court, and the investigating agency was found to have made serious lapses in the
investigation.

The Aarushi-Hemraj case highlights the dangers of false charges and the importance of strict
enforcement of Section 211. The case also underscores the need for fair and impartial
investigations and the importance of ensuring that justice is served in a timely manner.

Another prominent case involving false charges is the Duke Lacrosse scandal US. The members
of the Duke University men's team were wrongly held responsible of raping a woman. The
charges were eventually dropped, and it was found that the prosecutor had made serious errors in
the investigation.

The Duke Lacrosse case highlights the potential social implications of false charges, including
damage to reputations, loss of employment, and psychological trauma. The case also underscores
the importance of fair and impartial investigations and the need for accountability and
transparency in the justice system.

In conclusion, case studies of prominent cases involving false charges and the application of Sec
211 can guide the legal and social implications of such cases. Such studies can help raise
awareness about the dangers of false charges and the importance of strict enforcement of relevant
provisions. They can also help identify areas for improvement in the justice system, such as the
need for fair and impartial investigations and the importance of ensuring that justice is served in a
timely manner.

Another case is the 2014 Ferguson unrest in the US, an African American teenager, Michael
Brown was shot and killed by a police officer. Following the incident, false charges were made
against Brown, including claims that he had robbed a convenience store before the shooting.

23
These false charges fuelled tensions and protests in the community and highlighted the potential
social implications of false charges.

In both of these examples, false charges had significant legal and social implications, including
damage to reputations, loss of employment, and public outrage. These cases demonstrate the
importance of strict enforcement of relevant provisions, fair and impartial investigations, and the
need for accountability and transparency in the judicial organization.

24
CHAPTER – 7: THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN INTERPRETING AND ENFORCING SECTION 211,
AND THE CHALLENGES FACED BY THE COURTS IN CASES INVOLVING FALSE CHARGES

Role of the judiciary in interpreting and enforcing Section 211 is crucial in ensuring that false
charges are dealt with appropriately. The courts displays a vital role in upholding the law and
ensuring that justice is served in cases involving false charges.

Challenges faced by the courts is the need to deal with false charges effectively and efficiently.
False charges can have serious legal and social implications, and it is important to ensure that they
are dealt with appropriately to prevent further harm. However, false charges can also place a
burden on the courts and the judicial organization, and it is important to ensure that resources are
allocated effectively to deal with such cases.

Furthermore, the effectiveness of Section 211 in deterring false charges can also be impacted by
the understanding and implementation of the provision by the judiciary. The courts have an
important part in interpreting and enforcing the law, and their interpretation can have significant
implications for the effectiveness of the provision.

In conclusion, the role of the judiciary in interpreting and enforcing Section 211 is critical in
ensuring that false charges are dealt with appropriately. However, the courts face several
challenges in cases involving false charges, including the need to balance the rights of the accused
with the need to protect the interests of the victim and the need to deal with false charges
effectively and efficiently. Addressing these challenges can help ensure that the courts are better
equipped to deal with cases involving false charges and promote justice.

Judiciary can improve its role in interpreting and enforcing Section 211 and dealing with cases
involving false charges. Here are a few examples:

1. Ensuring timely and efficient disposal of cases: False charges can have serious legal and

social implications for the accused, and it is important to ensure that cases are dealt with in

a timely and efficient manner. The judiciary can work towards improving case

management systems and processes to ensure that cases involving false charges are given

priority and disposed of in a timely manner.

25
 2. Providing training and guidance to judges: False charges can be complex and require a

deep understanding of the law and legal principles. The judiciary can provide training and

guidance to judges to help them better understand the legal and social implications of false

charges and the importance of upholding the law.

3. Encouraging alternative dispute resolution mechanisms: In some cases, false charges may

be the result of misunderstandings or miscommunications between parties.

4. The judiciary can work towards enhancing transparency and accountability in the justice

system to help build public trust and confidence. This can include measures such as making

court proceedings more accessible to the public and holding judges and other court officials

accountable for their actions.

Overall, by taking these and other steps, the judiciary can help ensure that Section 211 is
effectively interpreted and enforced, and that false charges are dealt with fairly and efficiently,
while upholding the rights of both the accused and the victim.

26
CHAPTER – 8: THE POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF SECTION 211 FOR PROMOTING A FAIR AND JUST
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDIA, INCLUDING ITS IMPACT ON PROTECTING THE RIGHTS
OF THE ACCUSED AND DETERRING FALSE CHARGES

Sec 211 serves as a deterrent against false charges, which can have serious consequences for the
accused, such as wrongful detention and reputational harm.

Furthermore, Section 211 also helps to protect the rights of the accused by ensuring that they have
a fair trial. False charges can be used as a tool to harass and intimidate individuals, and Section
211 serves as a safeguard against such misuse. By punishing those who file false charges, the
provision helps to ensure that the accused are not subjected to harassment or malicious
prosecution.

In addition to deterring false charges and protecting the rights of the accused, Section 211 can also
help to enhance people’s belief in criminal judicial system. The provision helps to ensure that
justice is served and that those who make false charges are held accountable for their actions. This
can help to promote a fair and just criminal justice system in India by increasing public
confidence in the system's ability to provide justice.

Overall, Section 211 has the potential to promote a fair and just criminal justice system in India by
deterring false charges, protecting the rights of the accused, and promoting public belief in the
justice system. However, the effectiveness of the provision depends on its interpretation and
enforcement by the judiciary, as well as the allocation of resources towards dealing with false
charges.

One of the major intricacies of the topic is the challenge of ensuring that Section 211 is effectively
enforced. While the provision serves as a deterrent against false charges, it is important that the
police and the judiciary take adequate steps to investigate and prosecute those who file false
charges. This requires a well-functioning criminal justice system that is capable of handling false
charge cases in a timely and efficient manner.

Another intricacy is the potential for misuse of Section 211. In some cases, the provision may be
misused by those who file false charges in order to harass or intimidate individuals. It is important
that the police and the judiciary are vigilant and take adequate steps to ensure that the provision is
not misused.

Furthermore, there are social and cultural factors that may influence the filing of false charges. In
some cases, false charges may be the result of societal pressures or cultural norms that encourage

27
individuals to use the criminal justice system as a tool for settling personal disputes. Addressing
these underlying issues requires a broader societal and cultural shift towards more constructive
dispute resolution mechanisms.

This requires a careful balancing of the rights of the accused and the victim, and a nuanced
approach towards interpreting and enforcing Section 211.

28
 CHAPTER – 9: THE PREVALENCE OF FALSE CHARGES IN INDIA, AND THE IMPACT OF FALSE
CHARGES ON THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND SOCIETY AT LARGE

False charges are unfortunately not uncommon in India, and they can have significant
implications for the judicial system. There are several factors that contribute to the prevalence of
false charges in India, including social and cultural factors, political pressures, and personal
vendettas.

One of the major impacts of false charges on the judicial system is the burden they place on the
already overburdened system. False charges can lead to wrongful detention and trial, leading to
the wastage of valuable resources, time, and money.

False charges can also have significant social and economic implications. The accused can face
reputational harm, job loss, and social stigma, which can have long-term consequences for their
personal and professional lives. False charges can also exacerbate existing social tensions and
contribute to the breakdown of social harmony.

In addition, false charges can devalue the rule of law and erode public trust and confidence in the
criminal justice system. This can lead to a vicious cycle of mistrust and skepticism towards the
system, further undermining its effectiveness and legitimacy.

This includes effective enforcement of Section 211 and other relevant provisions, as well as
broader societal and cultural interventions to address the underlying factors that contribute to the
filing of false charges.

One of the challenges in addressing the issue of false charges is the lack of accurate data on the
prevalence of false charges in India. False charges are often difficult to detect and prosecute, and
there is a lack of systematic data collection and analysis on the issue. This makes it difficult to
develop effective strategies to prevent and address false charges.

Moreover, false charges are often linked to other broader issues such as corruption, political
influence, and systemic inefficiencies in the criminal justice system. Addressing false charges,
therefore, requires a holistic approach that takes into account these broader issues.

Overall, addressing the issue of false charges requires a multi-pronged approach that involves
effective enforcement of relevant legal provisions, data collection and analysis, and broader
societal and cultural interventions. It is only through such a comprehensive approach that we can
hope to address this pervasive and damaging issue.

29
CHAPTER – 10: THE CHALLENGES IN PROVING FALSE CHARGES AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF,
INCLUDING THE ROLE OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE AND WITNESS TESTIMONY

Proving false charges can be challenging, as it requires demonstrating that the charges were made
with malicious intent and without any basis in fact. The prosecution must provide evidence to
prove that the charges were false beyond a reasonable doubt.

One of the challenges in proving false charges is the lack of direct evidence. False charges are
often based on fabricated or distorted information, which can be difficult to detect and prove. The
prosecution may rely on circumstantial evidence, such as inconsistencies in witness statements or
forensic evidence, to demonstrate that the charges were false.

Forensic evidence can play an important role in disproving false charges. For example, DNA
evidence can be used to demonstrate that a particular individual was not involved in a crime.
Similarly, forensic evidence can be used to demonstrate that a particular piece of evidence was
planted or fabricated.

Witness testimony can also be important in proving false charges. Witnesses who have first-hand
knowledge of the events leading up to the charges can provide valuable testimony that can help to
demonstrate that the charges were false. However, witness testimony can be unreliable.

Overall, proving false charges can be challenging, and it requires a deligent analysis of the
available evidence & testimony. The role of forensic evidence and witness testimony can be
crucial in demonstrating that the charges were false, but their reliability and accuracy must be
carefully evaluated.

One additional challenge in proving false charges is the potential for tampering with evidence or
witnesses. False charges can sometimes be made with the collusion of law enforcement officials,
who may fabricate or manipulate evidence to support the charges. Similarly, witnesses may be
intimidated or coerced into providing false testimony.

To address these challenges, it is important to have robust mechanisms in place to protect against
tampering with evidence or witnesses. This may include measures such as independent oversight
and monitoring of law enforcement activities, witness protection programs, and strict adherence to
rules of evidence and due process.

In addition, addressing false charges requires a commitment to building a fair and just criminal
justice system that is free from corruption and political influence.

30
 CHAPTER – 11: THE IMPACT OF IPC SECTION 211 ON VICTIMS OF FALSE CHARGES,
INCLUDING THE AVAILABILITY AND ADEQUACY OF LEGAL REMEDIES FOR SUCH VICTIMS

IPC Section 211, which deals with false charges, is designed to protect the accused from
malicious and groundless charges. However, false charges can also have a significant impact on
the victims of such charges, who may face a range of legal and social consequences as a result.

One of the most significant impacts of false charges is the loss of reputation and social standing.
False charges can damage a person's reputation and lead to social ostracism, which can have long-
lasting effects on their personal and professional life. In addition, false charges can lead to legal
consequences, including arrest, detention, and prosecution, which can be traumatic and stressful
for the victim.

To address the impact of false charges on victims, it is important to have legal remedies that
provide adequate compensation and redress for victims. One such remedy is the provision for
complaining under Sec 211, which allows victims to seek legal action against the person making
the false charges.

In addition, victims of false charges may also be able to seek compensation under civil law, such
as for defamation or malicious prosecution. The availability and adequacy of these legal remedies
are crucial in mitigating the impact of false charges on victims and ensuring that they receive
appropriate redress for the harm caused to them.

However, despite the availability of legal remedies, victims of false charges often face significant
challenges in seeking justice. This may be due to factors such as a lack of resources or knowledge
about the legal system, social stigma, and fear of retaliation. Addressing these challenges requires
a concerted effort to improve justice and ensure that victims of false charges receive the support
and protection they need.

let me provide some further elaboration on the impact of IPC Section 211 on victims of false
charges and the legal remedies available to them.

As I mentioned earlier, false charges can have a significant impact on victims, including damage
to their reputation, social standing, and emotional well-being. Victims may also face legal
consequences, such as arrest and prosecution, which can be traumatic and stressful.

To address the impact of false charges on victims, legal remedies such as filing a complaint under
Section 211 or seeking compensation under civil law can be helpful. Filing a complaint under

31
Section 211 allows victims to seek legal action against the person making the false charges, and
can result in criminal charges being filed against the perpetrator. This can provide a sense of
justice and closure for the victim, and may deter others from making false charges in the future.

In addition, victims of false charges may also be able to seek compensation under civil law, such
as for defamation or malicious prosecution. This can provide financial compensation for any harm
suffered as a result of the false charges, and can help to mitigate the impact on the victim's life.

However, despite the availability of legal remedies, victims of false charges often face significant
challenges in seeking justice. These challenges may include a lack of resources or knowledge
about the legal system, social stigma, and fear of retaliation. To address these challenges, it is
important to ensure that victims of false charges receive the support and protection they need to
pursue legal remedies. This may involve providing legal aid and counselling services, as well as
implementing measures to protect victims from retaliation or harassment.

Another important aspect to consider in the context of the impact of IPC Section 211 on victims
of false charges is the need for effective implementation and enforcement of the law. While legal
remedies are available, they may not be effective if the law is not enforced consistently and fairly.
In some cases, victims may face pressure from influential individuals or groups to drop charges,
or may encounter resistance from law enforcement officials or the judicial system.

This may involve strengthening accountability mechanisms for law enforcement officials and
judges, increasing public awareness about the importance of holding perpetrators of false charges
accountable, and providing resources and training to law enforcement officials to ensure that they
understand the seriousness of false charges and the need to investigate such cases thoroughly.

Moreover, it is also important to ensure that victims of false charges are treated with dignity and
respect throughout the legal process. This may involve providing victims with support and
counselling services, ensuring that they are not re-victimized by the legal process, and protecting
their privacy and confidentiality to the extent possible. By doing so, we can help to ensure that the
impact of false charges on victims is minimized,

32
 CHAPTER – 12: THE POTENTIAL FOR MISUSE OF IPC SECTION 211, INCLUDING FALSE
COUNTER-CLAIMS OF FALSE CHARGES, AND THE NEED FOR SAFEGUARDS TO PREVENT SUCH
MISUSE

One potential concern with IPC Section 211 is that it may be misused by individuals who falsely
claim to have been falsely charged with a crime. This could occur, for example, in cases where a
defendant or their supporters file a counter-claim of false charges in an attempt to intimidate or
silence the victim or witnesses.

To prevent such misuse, the law is implemented in a true & impartial way. This may involve
strengthening accountability mechanisms for law enforcement officials and judges, and ensuring
that there are appropriate checks and balances in place to prevent abuse of the law authorities.

It is to be ensured that the law is not used as a tool for political or personal gain, and that
individuals are not falsely accused of making false charges simply as a means of retaliation or
harassment. To prevent such misuse, it may be necessary to provide training and resources to law
enforcement officials and judges to help them identify and investigate cases of false counter-
claims, and to ensure that victims and witnesses are protected from retaliation or harassment.

Overall, while IPC Section 211 has the potential to be a powerful tool for deterring false charges.

let me elaborate a bit more on this topic.

One of the potential risks of IPC Section 211 is that it could be used to make false counter-claims
of false charges. This could happen in a variety of situations, such as when an accused person or
their supporters falsely accuse the victim of making false charges in order to intimidate or silence
them.

To prevent such misuse, the law is implemented in a fair and impartial manner. This may involve
strengthening accountability mechanisms for law enforcement officials and judges, and providing
appropriate training and resources to help them identify and investigate cases of false counter-
claims.

In addition, it may be necessary to establish safeguards to protect victims and witnesses from
retaliation or harassment, particularly in cases where false counter-claims are made. For example,
courts could issue restraining orders or other protective measures to prevent accused persons or
their supporters from harassing or intimidating victims or witnesses.

33
 CHAPTER – 13: THE IMPACT OF IPC SECTION 211 ON THE BROADER ISSUE OF WRONGFUL
CONVICTIONS AND THE NEED FOR LEGAL REFORMS TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE

Let me explain here: Wrongful convictions are a serious problem in India, as in many other
countries, and can have devastating consequences for the individuals who are wrongfully
convicted and their families.

IPC Section 211 is important in addressing the same problem by deterring false charges and
protecting the rights of the accused. By imposing severe penalties on those who make false
charges, the law can help to deter individuals from making false allegations in the first place.

However, IPC Section 211 alone is not enough to address the broader issue of wrongful
convictions. To truly address this problem, broader legal reforms are needed, including
improvements to the investigative and prosecutorial processes, greater access to legal
representation for accused persons, and more effective mechanisms for identifying and correcting
wrongful convictions.

In addition, it is important to address systemic issues that contribute to wrongful convictions, such
as police misconduct, witness intimidation, and inadequate forensic analysis. By taking a
comprehensive approach to addressing wrongful convictions, including the use of IPC Section
211 as one tool among many, India can help to ensure a fair and just criminal justice system for
all.

Here are some additional points to consider:

IPC Section 211 can have a significant impact on reducing wrongful convictions by discouraging
the practice of filing false charges against individuals. However, Sec 211 alone cannot address all
of the factors that contribute to wrongful convictions.

One of the major challenges in addressing wrongful convictions is the lack of adequate legal
representation for accused persons. Many people who are wrongfully convicted are unable to
afford legal representation Legal aid programs and other measures to ensure access to legal
representation can help to address this problem.

Another challenge is the lack of effective mechanisms for identifying and correcting wrongful
convictions. India currently does not have a formal process for reviewing and overturning
wrongful convictions, which can leave innocent individuals languishing in prison for years or
even decades. Creating such a process, along with other reforms to enhance the accuracy &
fairness of the judicial system, could help to address the problem of wrongful convictions.

34
CHAPTER – 14: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN IPC SECTION 211 AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE
INDIAN PENAL CODE, INCLUDING THOSE RELATED TO DEFAMATION AND PERJURY

The interplay between IPC Section 211 and other provisions of the IPC, such as the ones related
to defamation and perjury, can be complex and raises a number of important legal and policy
issues.

Defamation is a civil wrong that involves making false statements about another person that harm
their reputation. In contrast, IPC Section 211 is a criminal offense that involves the filing of false
charges against someone with the intent to cause them harm. While there is some overlap between
these two concepts, they are distinct and serve different purposes.

Perjury, on the other hand, involves lying under oath in a court proceeding or other legal context.
Like IPC Section 211, perjury is a criminal offense, but it applies specifically to false statements
made in a legal setting. The burden of proof for perjury is generally higher than for false charges,
as prosecutors must show that the false statement was made under oath and with the intent to
deceive.

The interplay between these provisions can be complicated in cases where someone is accused of
making false statements in both a legal context (perjury) and in a criminal complaint (IPC Section
211). In some cases, individuals may use false charges as a means of retaliating against someone
who has accused them of a crime, and may also make false statements under oath in an attempt to
bolster their case. In such situations, the courts must carefully weigh the evidence to determine
whether the accused is guilty of both offenses, or only one.

Overall, the interplay between IPC Section 211 and other arrangements of the IPC highlights the
need for careful legal analysis and interpretation in cases involving false charges, defamation, and
perjury. The courts must carefully consider the evidence presented in each case to ensure that
justice is served and that the rights of all parties are protected.

The interplay between IPC Section 211 and other provisions of the IPC can be complex and can
often lead to confusion and ambiguity in legal proceedings. For example, a false charge may also
constitute the offense of perjury under Section 191 of the IPC, which deals with giving false
evidence. Similarly, a false charge may also constitute the offense of defamation under Section
499 of the IPC if it is made with the intent to harm the reputation of the accused.

The relationship between these provisions is important because it can impact the severity of the
punishment for the offender and the legal remedies available to the victim.

35
In addition, there may also be situations where a false charge is made with the intent to extort or
blackmail the accused. In such cases, the false charge may also fall under the ambit of other
provisions of the IPC such as Section 384 (extortion) or Section 503 (criminal intimidation). The
interplay between these provisions can be complex and requires careful consideration by legal
professionals.

36
 CHAPTER – 15: THE ROLE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN PREVENTING FALSE
CHARGES AND ENSURING THE FAIR AND IMPARTIAL INVESTIGATION OF CRIMINAL CASES

The job of law enforcement agencies is important in order to avoid false charges and ensuring the
fair and impartial investigation of criminal cases. In India, law enforcement agencies such as the
police are often the first point of contact between the victim and the criminal justice system. They
are responsible for registering FIRs, conducting investigations, and gathering evidence.

In cases involving false charges, law enforcement agencies have a responsibility to investigate the
matter thoroughly and ensure that the rights of both the accused and the victim are protected. This
requires a thorough understanding of the law and the ability to conduct investigations in a fair and
impartial manner.

To prevent false charges, law enforcement agencies must also be vigilant and ensure that all
complaints are thoroughly verified before acting. This can help prevent the misuse of legal
provisions and protect the rights of the accused.

In addition to the above, it is also important for law enforcement agencies to be properly trained
on how to handle cases involving false charges. This includes identifying the warning signs of
false charges, collecting evidence in a way that is admissible in court, and being able to
differentiate between a genuine complaint and a false one.

Moreover, law enforcement agencies must be accountable for their actions and must operate
within the legal framework and ethical standards set out in the law. This can help prevent the
misuse of power and ensure that investigations are conducted in a fair and impartial manner.

37
 CHAPTER – 16: HOW DO YOU THINK THAT THIS SECTION 211 BE STILL BE RELEVANT IN
TODAY'S AGE OF 21ST CENTURY AND WITH CHALLENGES OF FAKE NEWS AND FAKE
PROPAGANDA ALONG WITH THE SOCIAL MEDIA HITTING EVERYTHING?

IPC Section 211 continues to be relevant in today's age of fake news, fake propaganda, and social
media as false charges and malicious complaints can be spread widely through these platforms,
causing harm to innocent individuals and disrupting the justice system. In fact, the rise of social
media eased the false charges to be disseminated quickly and widely, making it all the more
important to have a provision like Section 211 in place.

Moreover, the provision has the potential to serve as a deterrent against those who seek to
manipulate the justice system through false charges. As more people become aware of the
consequences of making false charges, they may think twice before doing so.

However, the enforcement of Sec 211 must also evolve to keep up with the changing landscape of
the digital age. Law enforcement agencies and the judiciary must be equipped with the necessary
tools and training to identify and investigate false charges in the context of social media and
online platforms. Additionally, measures must be taken to prevent the misuse of Section 211, such
as false counter-claims of false charges, and to ensure that the provision is used in a fair and just
manner.

In addition to the challenges posed by fake news and social media, advancements in technology
such as deep fake videos and audio recordings can further complicate the issue of false charges. It
is important for the legal system to stay updated with these developments and adapt to new
challenges in order to effectively deter and address false charges. Additionally, greater awareness
and education among the public about the consequences of filing false charges can also help in
preventing such incidents.

38
 Chapter – 17: PHILOSOPHICAL OVERVIEW

Section 211 is a legal provision that varies depending on the jurisdiction and legal system
being referred to. Without specific information about the jurisdiction or context in which
Section 211 is applicable, it is challenging to provide a detailed analysis of its
philosophical implications. However, I can offer a general philosophical overview of legal
provisions and their potential implications.

From a philosophical perspective, Section 211 can be viewed as an attempt to balance the
right to seek justice and the need to prevent the abuse of legal processes. The section aims
to deter people from making false accusations against others, which can not only cause
harm to the accused but also clog up the justice system. However, some philosophers might
argue that the section could be misused by those in power to suppress dissent or intimidate
individuals who seek to bring to light cases of wrongdoing.

Overall, the philosophical debates surrounding Section 211 of the IPC are complex and
nuanced, and different scholars may have different perspectives on the section's ethical
implications.

39
 Chapter – 18: CLASSIFICATION OF JURISPRUDENCE

The act of submitting a false complaint with the aim to injure someone is a criminal offence
according to Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). According to the section, anyone
who brings or causes to bring a criminal, civil, or administrative case against another person
with the intent to harm them or who falsely accuses another person of committing a crime
faces a sentence of up to two years in prison, a fine, or both.

The offense under Section 211 is a non-cognizable offense, which means that the police cannot
arrest a person without a warrant in such cases. Additionally, Section 211 is a bailable offense,
which means that the accused can be released on bail pending trial.

Every case is unique, and the exact classification of the offense under Section 211 will depend
on the specific circumstances of the case, the intent of the accused, and the evidence presented
in court.

40
 Chapter – 19: RESEARCH PROBLEM

a. What is the significance of Section 211 in IPC – Meaning of the concept.

b. The various thought schools of Jurisprudence and Section 211 of the IPC; and how far
are they relevant with the modern-day society.
c. What is the stand of other countries in relation to Jurisprudence laws, which are similar
to Section 211 of the IPC.

Chapter – 20: OBJECTIVES

a. To find out the historical, religious and philosophical perspective that gave birth to the
concept of Jurisprudence (alongside the basis for Section 211).
b. To enlighten my mind about various types of Jurisprudence and their legal position in a
particular country.
c. To draw a comparative study amongst various nations and theories and schools of thoughts
of Jurisprudence (in light of Section 211 and misuse of it), so as to analyze their stand in
relation to these laws.

Chapter – 21: THE HYPOTHESIS IS:

“INDIA’s influence on the Legal Studies globally in the light of Jurisprudence – for providing
justice in cases of false arrests and illegal custody of innocents.”

Chapter – 22: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

My study is Doctrinal in nature. By carefully examining and analyzing the legal framework and
case laws in a logical, systematic, and scientific way, it helps to solve the legal problem with a new
output in a short amount of time with less expenses. It consists of the analysis of the legal doctrine
and how it has been developed and applied.

41
 Chapter – 23: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

From a legal standpoint the principle of dignity of a human being also finds it’s roots in the
principles driven by the constitutional law, which should be above religion, sex, sect, creed,
linguistic differences, colour of skin or ethnicity. Therefore, it is very important in this era to find
an equilibrium between all these principles.

Based on the information available, it is possible to draw some conclusions and provide suggestions
for the final closure of a dissertation around Sec 211 of IPC.

Firstly, it is required to note that Sec 211 is an important provision of the IPC that aims to deter
individuals from filing false complaints against others with aim of causing harm. This section seeks
to balance the right to seek justice with the need to prevent the abuse of legal processes.

Secondly, while the provision serves a legitimate purpose, it is also important to acknowledge that
it can be misused by those in power to suppress dissent or intimidate individuals who seek to bring
to light cases of wrongdoing. Therefore, it is crucial to examine how Section 211 is implemented
in practice and to explore the ethical implications of its use.

Thirdly, it may be useful to examine how the provision of Section 211 is interpreted by the judiciary
in different cases. The dissertation can explore how the courts have interpreted the intent to cause
injury.

Finally, the dissertation could provide suggestions for how Section 211 can be implemented more
effectively and ethically. For example, it may suggest that the provision should be used more
sparingly, or that mechanisms should be put in place to prevent its misuse by those in power.

Overall, a dissertation on Section 211 of the IPC should aim to provide a comprehensive analysis
of the provision, its ethical implications, and its implementation in practice, while also offering
suggestions for how it can be used more effectively and ethically in the future.

42
 Chapter – 24: BIBLIOGRAPHY

Here are some references that I have used in the bibliography for a dissertation on Section 211 of
the Indian Penal Code:

Bhalla, S. (2005). Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code. Journal of the Indian Law Institute,
47(2), 233-244.

Dugar, A. (2012). Filing a false case: Section 211 IPC-ingredients and limitations. The Indian
Journal of Criminology and Criminalistics, 33(1), 8-20.

Kaur, G. (2014). Misuse of section 211 of the Indian Penal Code. International Journal of
Humanities and Social Science Research, 4(1), 1-6.

Saini, M. (2017). False complaints and the Indian Penal Code: An analysis of Section 211.
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1(1), 21-33.

Singh, R. (2015). Misuse of criminal justice system and Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code.
Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 37(3), 293-295.

Thakur, A. (2018). False complaint under Section 211 of Indian Penal Code: An analytical study.
Journal of Indian Law Institute, 60(2), 177-189.

These references did help me in my research and provided a more in-depth.

Here are a few more references that I have used in my bibliography for a dissertation on Section
211 of the Indian Penal Code:

Verma, S. (2019). Section 211 IPC: An analytical study. International Journal of Research and
Analytical Reviews, 6(3), 69-74.

Chatterjee, A. (2013). An empirical study of the use and misuse of Section 211 of the Indian Penal
Code. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 4(2), 29-41.

Ganesan, S. (2011). The use and misuse of Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code. Indian Journal
of Criminology and Criminalistics, 32(2), 146-155.

Singh, N. (2016). Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code: Its interpretation and impact on false
cases. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 58(4), 493-503.

43
Verma, S. (2014). The use and misuse of Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code: A critical
analysis. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 5(1), 41-48.

These additional references could provide further insights and analysis on the use, misuse, and
interpretation of Section 211 of the IPC.

There are many more references available that you could use in this bibliography for a dissertation
on Sec 211 of the IPC. However, the references I have provided should be sufficient to get started
and provide a comprehensive analysis of the provision, its ethical implications, and its
implementation in practice. We could also conduct a more targeted search using the research topic
to find more relevant sources. Additionally, I have consulted with my dissertation advisor and the
subject matter expert to also help me identify additional references and sources that were useful in
my research.

Abel, Richard (1973a) ‘A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society’ 8 Law and
Society Rev.212.

Abel, Richard (1973b) ‘Law Books and Books about Law’, 26 Stanford L. Rev. 175.

Abel, Richard (1988) The Legal Profession in England and WalesOxford: Blackwell.

Abel, Richard (1989) American LawyersOxford: Oxford University Press.

Abel, Richard (2001) ‘Lawyers’ 12 IESBS3358.

Abel, Richard and Lewis, Philip (eds.) (1988–9) Lawyers in Society. Vol 1. The Common Law
World; Vol 2 The Civil Law World; Vol 3 Comparative TheoriesBerkeley, CA: University of
California Press.

Abel-Smith, Brian & Stevens, Robert (1967) Lawyers and the Courts: A Sociological Study of the
English Legal System 1750–1965Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Abimbola, Wande and Abimbola, Kola (2007) Orisa: Yoruba Religion and Culture in Africa and
the DiasporaBirmingham: Iroko Academic Publishers.

Abraham, David (2007) ‘The Boundaries and Bonds of Citizenship: Recognition and
Redistribution in the United States, Germany and Israel’ 7 Migration in History210.

44
Adler, Matthew D. and Posner, Eric A. (eds.) (2001) Cost–Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic and
Philosophical PerspectivesChicago: University of Chicago Press.

Adler, P. A. and Adler, P., (1987) Membership Roles in Field ResearchLondon: Sage.

Ahmed, Khurshid (2003) ‘The Challenge of Global Capitalism: An Islamic Perspective’ in

Dunning, (ed.) Chapter 8.

Ahsan, M. M., and Kidwai, A. R. (eds.) (1993) Sacrilege versus Civility: Muslim Perspectives on
The Satanic Verses Affair rev. edn. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.

Alfieri, Anthony (1993) ‘Impoverished Practices: Critical Theories and Legal Ethics’ 81
Georgetown L. Jo. 2567.

Allen, Layman E. and Baade, Hans (eds) (1963) JurimetricsNew York: Basic Books.

Allison, John W. F. (1996) A Continental Distinction in the Common LawOxford: Oxford

University Press.

Allott, Anthony N. (1970) New Essays in African LawLondon: Butterworth.

Allott, Anthony (1980) The Limits of LawLondon: Butterworth.

Allott, Anthony N. (2000) ‘The Hunting of the Snark or the Quest for the Holy Grail: The Search
for Customary Law’ in Edge, Ian (ed.) Chapter 3.

Allott, Philip (1990) Eunomia: New Order for the WorldOxford: Oxford University Press.

Allott, Philip (2002) The Health of Nations: Society and Law beyond the StateCambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

Alston, P. (2005a) ‘Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and
Development Debate Seen Through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals’, 27 Human
Rights Qrtly755.

Alston, Philip (ed.) (1999) The EU and Human RightsOxford: Oxford University Press.

Alston, Philip (ed.) (2005b) Labour Rights as Human RightsOxford: Oxford University Press.

Alter, N. (2001) ‘Diffusion, Sociology of ’, 6 IESBS3681.

Al-Turabi, Hassan (2006) ‘Sudanese Scholar Hassan Al-Turabi Elaborates on his Revolutionary
Fatwa’ www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1112.

45
Aluffi, Roberta B.-P. and Zincone, Giovanna (eds.) (2004) The Legal Treatment of Islamic
Minorities in EuropeLeuven: Peeters.

Amadiume, Ifi and An-Na'im, Abdullahi (eds.) (2000) The Politics of MemoryLondon: Zed
Books.

,American Bar Association (1992) Legal Education and Professional Development (The MacCrate
Report) Chicago: American Bar Association.

American Law Institute, 75th Anniversary 1923–98 (1998) Philadelphia: ALI.

Andersen, Camilla Basch (2006) ‘Scandinavian Law in Legal Traditions of the World’ 1 Jo.
Comparative Law142.

Anderson, Norman (1976) Law Reform in the Muslim WorldLondon: Athlone.

An Na'im, Abdullahi (1990) Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights and
International LawSyracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, Preface by John Voll.

An Na'im, Abdullahi (1993) ‘Toward an Islamic Reformation; Responses and Reflections’ in

Lindholm and Vogt (eds.) Chapter 6.

An Na'im, Abdullahi (1999) ‘Promises We Should All Keep in Common Cause’ in Okin, et al.

An Na'im, Abdullahi (2001) ‘Human Rights in the Arab World: A Regional Perspective’ 23
Human Rights Qtrly701.

An Na'im, Abdullahi (2002) Islamic Family Law in a Changing World: A Global Resource
BookLondon: Zed Books.

An Na'im, Abdullahi (2004a) ‘The Future of Shari'ah Project’ (Memo.)

An Na'im, Abdullahi (2004b) ‘To Affirm the Full Human Rights Standing of Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights’ in Ghai, and Cottrell, (eds.).

An Na'im, Abdullahi (2005) The Future of Shari'a (Unpublished manuscript).

An-Na'im, Abdullahi (2006) African Constitutionalism and the Role of IslamPhiladelphia:

University of Pennsylvania Press.

An-Na'im, Abdullahi (2008) Islam and the Secular State: negotiating the future of
Shari'aCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

An-Na'im, Abdullahi (ed.) (1992) Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for
Consensus. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

46
An Na'im, Abdullahi (ed.) (2003) Human Rights Under African Constitutions: Realizing the
Promise for OurselvesPhiladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

An Na'im, Abdullahi and Deng, Francis (eds.) (1990) Human Rights in Africa: Cross-Cultural
PerspectivesWashington, DC: Brookings Institution.

An-Na'im, Abdullahi, Gort, Jerald, Jansen, Henry, and Vroom, Hendrik M. (eds.) (1995) Human
Rights and Religious ValuesAmsterdam: Eerdmans.

Annan, Kofi (2005) ‘In Larger Freedom’ Report to Security Council, March 2005.

Antokolskaia, Masha (2007) ‘Comparative Family Law: Moving with the Times?’ in Őrűcű, and
Nelken, (eds.).

Arkoun, Mohd. (1993) ‘The Concept of “Islamic Reformation” ’ in Lindholm, and Vogt, (eds.).

Arminjon, Pierre, Boris Nolde, Baron and Wolff, Martin (1950–51) Traité de Droit ComparéParis:
Librarie Generale de droit et de jurisprudence (3 vols).

,Association of Democratic Lawyers (1958–81) Review of Contemporary LawBrussels.

Atiyah, Patrick (1970/2006) Accidents, Compensation and the Law London: Weidenfeld, and
Nicolson, ; (7th edn., (ed.) Cane, P.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Atiyah, Patrick and Summers, Robert (1987) Form and Substance in American LawOxford:
Oxford University Press.

Atkinson, Max and Drew, Paul (1979) Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in
Judicial SettingsLondon: Macmillan.

Atria, Fernando (2002) On Law and Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Hart

Attfield, Robin and Wilkins, Barry (eds.) (1992) International Justice and the Third
WorldLondon: Routledge.

Austin, John (1832/1863/1954) The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and The Uses of the
Study of Jursprudence (ed. Hart, H. L. A.). London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Ayer, Alfred J. (1948) ‘The Principle of Utility’ in Keeton, G. W. and Schwarzenberger, G. (eds.).

Ayer, Alfred J. (ed) (1956) The Revolution in PhilosophyLondon: Macmillan.

Ayres, Ian and Braithwaite, John (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation
DebateNew York: Oxford University Press.

47
Baderin, Mashood A. (2003) International Human Rights and Islamic LawOxford: Oxford
University Press.

Baghramian, M. (2001) ‘Relativism: Philosophical Aspects’ 19 IESBS13012.

Bainbridge, John (1972) Study and Teaching of Law in AfricaSouth Hackensack: Rothman.

Bainham, Andrew (ed.) (1994) The International Survey of Family LawNetherlands: International
Society of Family Law.

Baker, John H. (1977) ‘University College and Legal Education, 1826–1976’ 1 Current Legal
Problems13.

Balas, Aron, Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Schleifer, Andrei (2008) The
Divergence of Legal Procedures (NBER Working Paper 13809) Cambridge, MA: National
Bureau of Economic Research.

Baldwin, John and Davis, Gwynn (2003) ‘Empirical Research in Law’ in Cane, and Tushnet,
(eds.) Chapter 39.

Baldwin, John and Bottomley, Keith A., (1978) Criminal Justice: Selected ReadingsLondon:
Martin Robertson.

Balkin, John (1987) ‘Deconstructive Practice and Legal Theory’, 96 Yale Law Jo. 743.

Ballard, Roger (2006) ‘Ethnic Diversity and the Delivery of Justice: The Challenge of Plurality’
in Shah, and Menski, (eds.) Chapter 2.

Ballard, Roger (ed.) (1994) Desh Pardesh: The South Asian Presence in BritainLondon: Hurst.

Banakar, Reza (2002) ‘Sociological Jurisprudence’ in Banakar and Travers Chapter 2.

Banaker, Reza and Travers, Max (eds.) (2002) A Introduction to Law and Social TheoryOxford:
Hart.

Banaker, Reza and Travers, Max (eds.) (2005) Theory and Method in Socio-legal
ResearchOxford: Hart.

,Bangkok Governmental Declaration (1993).

Bano, Samia (2007a) ‘Islamic family Arbitration, Justice and Human Rights in Britain’ 2007(1)
Law, Social Justice and Global Development Jo.
www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2007_1/bano

48
Bano, Samia (2007b) ‘Muslim Family Justice and Human Rights: The Experience of British
Muslim Women’ 1 Jo. Comparative Law 38.

Barcello, John J. III and Cramton, Roger C. (eds.) (1999) Lawyers' Practice and Ideals: A
Comparative View. The Hague and London: Kluwer Law International.

Barfield, Thomas (ed.) (1997) The Dictionary of AnthropologyOxford: Blackwell.

Barnett, Hilaire (1995) ‘The Province of Jurisprudence Determined – Again!’ 15 Legal Studies88.

Barnett, Hilaire and Yach, Diana (1985) ‘The Province of Jurisprudence Determined’ 5 Legal
Studies151.

Barrett, David, Kurian, George T. and Johnson, Todd M. (eds.) (2001) World Christian
Encyclopedia: A Comparative Study of Churches and Religions in the Modern WorldOxford:
Oxford University Press.

Barry, Brian (1972) The Liberal Theory of JusticeOxford: Clarendon Press.

Barry, Christian and Pogge, Thomas (eds.) (2005) Global Institutions and Responsibilities:
Achieving Global JusticeOxford: Blackwell.

Barton, John, Gibbs, Jack P. L., and Merryman, John H. (1983) Law in Radically Different
Cultures. St. Paul, Minn.: West.

Baslar, Kemal (1998) The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International LawThe
Hague: Marinus Nijhoff.

Bauer, Joanne R. and Bell, Daniel A. (eds.) (1999) The East Asian Challenge to Human
RightsCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bauman, Jon R. (1999) Pioneering a Global Vision: The Story of Baker and McKenzieChicago:
Harcourt Professional Education Group.

Bavinck, Maarten and Woodman, Gordon (forthcoming 2009) ‘Can There be Maps of Law?’ in
Benda-Beckmann, Franz, Benda-Beckmann, Keebet and Griffiths, Anne,

Baxi, Upendra (1985) Courage, Craft and Contention: The Indian Supreme Court in the
EightiesBombay: Tripathi.

Baxi, Upendra (1986a) Introduction to Bentham's Theory of Legislation (revised reprint) Bombay:
Tripathi.

49
Baxi, Upendra (1991a) ‘Conflicting conceptions of legal cultures and conflict of legal cultures’ 33
Jo. of the Indian Law Institute173.

Baxi, Upendra (1995a) ‘“Summit of Hope” in the Depths of Despair? Social Development as a
Realization of Human Rights’ xxiii 21 Mainstream19.

Baxi, Upendra (1995b) ‘The Myth and Reality of the Indian Adminstrative Law’ An Introduction
to Massey, I. P., Lucknow: Eastern Book Company.

Baxi, Upendra (1996a) ‘A Work in Progress?’: The United Nations Report to the United Nations
Human Rights Committee' 38 Indian Jo. International Law34.

Baxi, Upendra (1996b) “‘Global Neighbourhood’ and the ‘Universal Otherhood’: Notes on the
Report of the Commission on Global Governance” 22 Alternatives525.

Baxi, Upendra (1996c) ‘The Unreason of Globalization and the Reason of Human Rights’ A. K.
Desai Memorial Lecture Bombay: Mumbai: University of Mumbai.

Baxi, Upendra (1996d) ‘Human Rights Education: A Promise for the Third Millennium?’ 8th
Zakir Hussain Memorial Lecture, Delhi.

Baxi, Upendra (1997) ‘Judicial Activism: Usurpation or Re-democratization?’ 47 Social

Action342.

Baxi, Upendra (1998) ‘Voices of Suffering: Fragmented Universality, and the Future of Human
Rights’ 8 Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 125 and in Weston, and Marks, (eds.)
(1999).

Baxi, Upendra (2000a) ‘Gender and Reproductive Rights in India: Problems and Prospects.

Baxi, Upendra (2000b) Mass Torts, Multinational Enterprise Liability and Private International
LawThe Hague.

Baxi, Upendra (2000c) ‘Constitutionalism as a Site of State Formative Practices’ 21 Cardozo L.

Rev. 1183.

Baxi, Upendra (2001b) ‘What Happens Next is Up to You: Human Rights at Risk in Dams and
Development’, 16 American U. International Law Rev. 1507.

Baxi, Upendra (2001c) ‘Operation ‘Enduring Freedom’: Towards a New International Order’ 1.

Baxi, Upendra (2001d) ‘Too many, or too few, human rights?’ 1 Human Rights Law Rev. 1.

Baxi, Upendra (2002a) The Future of Human RightsDelhi: Oxford University Press.

50
Baxi, Upendra (2002b) ‘Memory and Rightlessness’ Fifteenth J. P. Naik Lecture Delhi:.

Baxi, Upendra (2002c) ‘Sense and Sensibility’ Online Seminarwww.india-

seminar.com/semframe.htm

Baxi, Upendra (2002d) ‘Rule of Law in India: Theory and Practice’ HKU seminar (revised 2003).

Baxi, Upendra (2003a) Comment on the UN Draft Code of Conduct of Transnational

Corporations.

Baxi, Upendra (2003b) ‘The Colonialist Heritage’ in Legrand, and Munday, (eds.) Chapter 3.

Baxi, Upendra (2003c) ‘A Known but an Indifferent Judge’: Situating Ronald Dworkin.
I.CON557.

Baxi, Upendra (2005a) ‘Market Fundamentalisms: Business Ethics at the Altar of Rights’ 59.

Baxi, Upendra (2005b) ‘The War ON Terror and the War OF Terror: Nomadic Multititudes,

Baxi, Upendra (2006a) The Future of Human Rights (2nd edn) New Delhi: Oxford University
Press.

Baxi, Upendra (2006b) The Human Right to Human Rights Education? Some Critical
PerspectivesNew Delhi: Universal Law Book Co.

Baxi, Upendra (2006c) (Founder' Day Lecture) Madras: Madras Institute of Development Studies.

Baxi, Upendra (2007a) Human Rights in a Posthuman WorldNew Delhi: Oxford: University
Press.

Baxi, Upendra, (2007b) ‘Amartya Sen and Human Rights’ in Baxi, (2007a) Chapter 2.

Baxi, Upendra (2007c) ‘From Human Rights to Human Flourishing: Julius Stone, Amartya Sen,
and Beyond?’ Julius Stone Lecture, University of Sydney.

Baxi, Upendra (ed.) (1986b) Inconvenient Forum and Convenient Catastrophy: The Bhopal
CaseBombay:

Baxi, Upendra (ed.) (1989) Law and PovertyBombay: N.M. Tripathi.

Baxi, Upendra and Dhandha, A. (eds.) (1990) Valiant Victims and Lethal Litigation: The Bhopal
CaseBombay: Tripathy.

Baxi, Upendra and Koenig, Shulamith (2006) The People's Report on Human Rights Education.

51
Beale, Hugh (2006) ‘The European Civil Code movement and the European Union's
Management4

Becher, Tony (1989) Academic Tribes and TerritoriesMilton Keynes: Open University Press.

Beck, Ulrich (1992) The Risk SocietyLondon: Sage.

Bedau, Hans (2000) ‘Anarchical Fallacies: Bentham's Attack on Human Rights’ 22 Human Rights
Quarterly261.

Beecher-Monas, Erica (2007) Evaluating Scientific EvidenceNew York: Cambridge University

Press.

Beer, Lawrence W. and Itoh, Hiroshi (1996) The Constitutional Case Law of Japan, 1970 through
1990Seattle:

Beetham, David (1993) Auditing Democracy in BritainUniversity of Essex: Democratic Audit

Paper No. 1.

Beitz, Charles (1979) Political Theory and International RelationsPrinceton: Princeton University
Press.

Beitz, Charleset al. (eds) (1985) International Ethics: A Philosophy and Public Affairs
ReaderPrinceton: Princeton University Press.

Bell, Christine (2006) ‘Peace Agreements: Their Nature and Status’ 100 Am. Jo. International
Law373.

Bell, Christine, Campbell, Colm, and Aolaín, Fionnuala Ní (2004) ‘Justice Discourses in
Transition’ 13 Social and Legal Studies325.

Bell, Christine, Campbell, Colm, and Aolain, Fionnuala Ni (2005/6) ‘The Paradox of Transition in
Conflict Democracies’ 27 Human Rights Qrtrly172.

Bell, Christineet al. (eds.) (2007) Special Issue: ‘Transitional Justice’ 3 International Jo. of Law in
Context No.2.

Bell, John (2001) French Legal CulturesLondon: Butterworth.

Bell, John (2006) ‘Chapter Five: Civil Law Tradition’ (Review of Glenn) (2004) in Foster, (ed.) p.
130.

Belvedere, Andrea (1997) ‘Some Observations on the Language of the Italian Civil Code’ in
Pintore, and Jori, (eds.) p. 339.

52
Bennett, T. W (1999) Human Rights and Customary Law Under the South African
ConstitutionCape Town: Juta.

Bentham, Jeremy (1777–79) ‘Of Torture’ (ed. , P. E and Twining, W. L. (1973) in James, M.
(ed.)).

Bentham, Jeremy (1786–9) Principles of International Law 2 Works561.

Bentham, Jeremy (1795) Supply Without Burden or Escheat vice Taxation 2 Works585–98.

Bentham, Jeremy (1802) Traité de législation civile et pénale (ed. Dumont, E.) Paris: Bentham,
Jeremy.

Bentham, Jeremy (1989) ‘Constitutional Code Rationale’ in First Principles Preparatory to

Constitutional Code (ed. Schofield, P..) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jeremy, Bentham (1825) A Treatise on Judicial Evidence (ed. Dumont, , anon trs.) London: J. W
Paget.

Bentham, Jeremy (1827) Rationale of Judicial Evidence (ed. Mill, J. S, 5 vols.) London: Hunt and
Clarke.

Jeremy, Bentham (1831) Parliamentary Candidate's Proposed Declaration of Principles

Bentham, Jeremy (1838–43) Principles of the Civil Code 1 Works297–364.

Bentham, Jeremy (1970) Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (ed. Burns, J. H.
and Hart, H. L. A, CW) London: Athlone Press; (2nd edn. (1996) Oxford: Clarendon Press).

Bentham, Jeremy (1977) Comment on the Commentaries and A Fragment on Government (ed.
Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. ACW) London: Athlone Press.

Bentham, Jeremy (1983a) Constitutional Code I (ed. Rosen, F. and Burns, J. H., (CW)) Oxford:
Oxford University Press.

Bentham, Jeremy (1983b) Deontology (ed. Goldworth, AmnonCW) Oxford: Oxford University
Press.

Bentham, Jeremy (1990) Securities Against Misrule and Other Constitutional Writings for Tripoli
and Greece

Bentham, Jeremy (1995) Colonies, Commerce and Constitutional Law: Rid Yourselves of

Bentham, Jeremy (1998a) ‘Legislator of the World’: Writings on Codification, Law and
EducationSchofield, Philip and Harris, Jonathan (eds.) (CW) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

53
Bentham, Jeremy (2001) Writings on the Poor Laws (Quinn, Michael (ed.) CW) Oxford: Oxford
University.

Bentham, Jeremy (2002) Nonsense Upon Stilts in Rights, Representation and Reform: (Also
known as Anarchical Fallacies.)

Benton, Lauren (1994) ‘Beyond Legal Pluralism: Towards a New Approach to the Informal
Social and Legal Studies223.

Benton, Lauren (2002) Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History 1400–
1900Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berelson, Bernard and Steiner, Gary A. (1964) Human Behavior: An Inventory of Scientific
FindingsNew York

Bergin, Thomas (1968) ‘The Law Teacher: A Man Divided against Himself’ 54 Virginia
L.Rev637.

Berg-Schlosser, D (2001) ‘Comparative Studies: Method and Design’ 4 IESBS2427.

Berkowitz, Daniel, Pistor, Katharina and Richard, Jean-Francois, (2003) ‘The Transplant Effect’,
51 American Jo. Comparative Law163.

Berman, Harold J. (1950) (2nd edn 1963) Justice in Russia: An Interpretation of Soviet
LawCambridge, MA.:

Berman, Harold (1983) Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western TraditionCambridge,
MA.:

Berman, Harold J. (1995) ‘World law’ 18 Fordham International Law Jo. 1617.

Berman, Harold (2003) Law and Revolution II: The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the
Western Legal TraditionCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bermann, George A. and Mavroidis, Petros C. (2007) WTO Law and Developing CountriesNew
York:

Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.) (2008) Philosophy of International LawOxford:

Beveridge, Fiona and Nott, Sue (1998) ‘A Hard Look at Soft Law’ in Craig, Harlow (eds.)
Chapter 14.

Bierbaum, Rosina M. (2008) ‘Energy and Climate Change’ 61 Bulletin of the American Academy
of Arts and Sciences32.

54
Binder, Gyorah and Weisberg, Robert (2000) Literary Criticisms of Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.

Bix, Brian (1995) ‘Conceptual Questions and Jurisprudence’ 1 Legal Theory465.

Bix, Brian (2000) ‘Conceptual Jurisprudence and Socio-Legal Studies’. 32 Rutgers Law Jo. 227.

Black, Donald (1976) The Behavior of LawLondon: Academic Press.

Black, Donald (1989) Sociological Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Black, Donald (1993) The Social Structure of Right and WrongSan Diego: Academic Press.

Black, Donald (1995) ‘The Epistemology of Pure Sociology’ 20 Law and Social Inquiry829.

Black, Donald (2007) ‘Relativity, Legal’ in Clark, David S. (ed.) Vol. 3, 1292.

Black, Max (1952) Critical Thinking (2nd edn) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Black, Max (1962) Models and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Black, Richard and White, Howard (eds.) (2004) Targeting Development: Critical Perspectives on
the Millennium Development GoalsLondon: Routledge.

Blankenburg, Erhard and Bruinsma, Freek, (1994) Dutch Legal Culture (2nd edn) Deventer:

Blaustein, Albert P. and Porter, Charles O. (1954) The American LawyerChicago: University of
Chicago Press.

Blomley, Nicolas (1994) Law, Space and the Geographies of PowerNew York: Guilford Press.

Bodenheimer, Edgar (1955–56) ‘Modern Analytical Jurisprudence and the Limits of its
Usefulness’

Bohannan, Paul (1957) Justice and Judgement Among the Tiv of NigeriaOxford: Oxford

Bowring, John (ed.) (1838–43) The Works of Jeremy BenthamEdinburgh: W. Tait.

Bradney, Anthony and Cownie, Fiona (2000) Living Without Law: An Ethnography of Quaker
Decision-making, Dispute Avoidance and Dispute Resolution. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Bradney, Tony (1998) ‘Law as a Parasitic Discipline’ 25 Jo. Law and Society71.

Braithwaite, John and Drahos, Peter (2000) Global Business RegulationCambridge: Cambridge
University Press.

55
Brandt, Richard (1967) ‘Ethical Relativism’ in Encyclopedia of PhilosophyEdwards, P. (ed).

Braudel, Fernand (1993) A History of Civilizations (trs. Mayne, Richard) Viking Press, New
York; (1st edn) Grammaire de Civilizations Paris: Les Editions Arthaud, 1987.

Brewer, Neil and Williams, Kipling D. (2005) Psychology and Law: An Empirical
PerspectiveNew York:

Brierley, James L (1963) The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the Law of Peace Oxford:
Oxford University Press,

,British Academy (2004) That Full Complement of Riches, The Contributions of the Arts,

Brooks-Gordon, Belinda and Freeman, Michael (eds.) (2006) Law and Psychology Oxford:
Oxford University Press.

Brown, L. A. (2001 ‘Diffusion: Geographical Aspects’ 6 IESBS3676.

Brown, Peter and Shue, Henry (eds.) (1977) Food Policy New York: Free Press.

Buchanan, Allen (2000) ‘Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World’ 110
Ethics697.

Buckland, William W. (1890) ‘Difficulties of Abstract Jurisprudence’ 24 LQR436.

Buckland, William W. (1945) Some Reflections on Jurisprudence Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Bullard, Robert D. (ed.) (2005) The Quest for Environmental JusticeSan Fransisco: University of
California Press.

Bunn, Isabella (2006) The Right to Development and International Economic Law: Legal and
Moral DimensionsOxford: Hart.

Burman, Sandra and Harrell-Bond, Barbara (eds.) (1979) The Imposition of LawNew York:
Academic Press.

Burns, James (1966) ‘Bentham and the French Revolution’ Transactions of the Royal Historical
Society, 5th series, Vol. 16, p. 95.

Burns, James (1973) ‘Bentham on Sovereignty: An Exploration’ in James, M. (ed.) 133.

Busumtwi-Sam, James (2002) ‘Development and Human Security: Whose Security, and Security
from What?’ 57 International Journal253.

56
Butler, William E (2006) ‘Russia, Legal Traditions of the World, and Legal Change’ 1 Jo
Comparative Law142.

Cain, Maureen and Hunt, Alan (eds.) (1979) Marx and Engels on LawLondon: Academic Press.

Calvino, Italo (1974) Invisible Cities. (trs. Weaver, William) San Diego: Harcourt Brace.

Calvino, Italo (1986) Mr. Palomar (trs. Weaver, William) San Diego: Harcourt Brace.

Campbell, Tom (2007) ‘Poverty as a Violation of Human Rights: Inhumanity or Injustice?’

Campbell, Tom, Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, and Stone, Adrienne (eds.) (2003) Protecting Human
Rights: Instruments and InstitutionsOxford: Oxford University Press.

Campbell, Tom, Ewing, Keith and Tomkins, Adam (eds.) (2001) Sceptical Essays on Human
RightsOxford: Oxford University Press.

Cane, Peter and Tushnet, Mark (eds.) (2003) The Oxford Handbook of Legal StudiesOxford:

Carlin, Jerome (1962) Lawyers on their OwnNew Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Carlin, Jerome (1966) Lawyers' EthicsNew York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Carothers, Thomas (1999) Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning CurveWashington, DC: The
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Carson, David and Bull, Ray (eds.) (2003) Handbook of Psychology in Legal ContextsChichester:
John Wiley.

Carson, David, Milne, Becky, Pakes, Francis, Shalev, Karen, and Shawyer, Andrea (eds.) (2007)
Applying Psychology to Criminal JusticeChichester: John Wylie.

Carty, Tony (ed.) (1992) Law and DevelopmentNew York: New York University Press.

Cassese, Antonio (2003) (2nd edn) International Criminal LawOxford: Oxford University Press.

Castellino, Joshua and Redondo, Elvira Dominguez (2006) Minority Rights in Asia: A
Comparative Legal AnalysisOxford: Oxford University Press.

Castells, Manuel (2000) End of MillenniumOxford: Blackwell.

Cauquelin, Josiane, Lim, Paul and Mayer-Konig, Birgit (eds.) (1998) Asian Values: An Encounter
with DiversityRichmond: Curzon Press.

Chaliand, Gérard and Rageau, Jean-Pierre, (1995) The Penguin Atlas of DiasporasNew York:

57
Chambers, Robert (1983) Rural DevelopmentLondon: Longman Scientific and Technical.

Chang, Ruth (ed.) (1997) Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical ReasonCambridge,

MA

Chanock, Martin (1985) Law, Custom, and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and
ZambiaCambridge:

Charlesworth, Hilary, Chinkin, Christine and Wright, Shelley (1991) ‘Feminist Approaches to
International Law’ 85 American Jo. International Law613.

Chayes, Abraham and Chayes, Antonia (1995) The New Sovereignty: Compliance with
International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

Cheru, Fantu and Bradford, Colin (eds.) (2005) The Millennium Development Goals: Raising the
Resources to Tackle World PovertyLondon: Zed Books.

Chiba, Masaji (1989) Legal Pluralism: Towards a General Theory through Japanese Legal
CultureTokyo:

Chiba, Masaji (1993) Sociology of Law in Non-Western CountriesOnati: Onati Institute for the
Sociology.

Chiba, Masaji (1998) ‘Other Phases of Legal Pluralism in the Contemporary World’ 11 Ratio
Juris228.

Chiba, Masaji (ed.) (1986) Asian Indigenous Law: In Interaction with Received LawLondon:
Kegan Paul International.

Chinkin, Christine (1989) ‘The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International
Law’ 38 International and Comparative Law Quarterly850.

Chua, Amy (1998) ‘Markets, Democracy, and Ethnicity: Toward a New Paradigm for Law and
Development’,

Chua, Amy (2003) World on FireNew York: Doubleday.

Cingranelli, David (1988) Human Rights: Theory and MeasurementNew York: St Martin's Press.

Clark, David S. (ed.) (2007) Encyclopedia of Law and Society: American and Global
PerspectivesThousand.

Clark, Philip (2006) ‘The Rules (and Politics) of Engagement: Aiming at Truth, Justice, Healing
and Reconciliation

58
Clark, Philip and Kaufman, Zackery (eds.) (2009) Rebuilding after Genocide: Transitional Justice,
Post-Conflict Resolution and Reconciliation in Rwanda New York:

Clarke, Alison and Kohler, Paul (2005) Property Law: Commentary and MaterialsCambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

Clemens, Michael A., Kenny, Charles J. and Moss, Todd J. (2004) ‘The Trouble with the MDGs:

Cohen, David and Atieno, E. S. (1992) Burying S. M.: The Politics of Knowledge and the
Sociology of Power in AfricaLondon: James Currey.

Cohen, L. Jonathan (1954) The Principles of World CitizenshipOxford: Blackwell.

Cohen, L. Jonathan (1992) An Essay on Belief and AcceptanceOxford: Clarendon Press.

Cohen, Roberta and Deng, Francis, (1998) Masses in Flight: The Global Crisis of Internal
DisplacementWashington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Coleman, Jules (ed.) (2001) The Practice of Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Collier, Jane and Starr, June (eds.) (1989) History and Power in the Study of Law. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.

Collins, Hugh (1982) Marxism and LawOxford: Oxford University Press.

Comair-Obeid, Nayla (1996) The Law of Business Contracts in the Middle EastLondon: Kluwer
International.

Conaghan, Joanne, Fischl, Richard M. and Klare, Karl (eds) (2002) Labour Law in an Era of
GlobalizationOxford: Oxford University Press.

Conklin, William E. (2008) Hegel's Laws: The Legitimacy of a Modern Legal OrderStanford:
Stanford University Press.

Cook, Rebecca (ed.) (1994) Human Rights of Women: National and International
PerspectivesPhiladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Cooper, John, Nettler, Ronald and Mahmoud, Mohamed (eds.) (2000) Islam and Modernity:
Muslim Intellectuals RespondLondon: Tauris.

Cooper, Robert L. (ed.) (1982) Language Spread: Studies in Diffusion and Social
ChangeBloomington, Ind.: University of Indiana Press.

Coser, Lewis, A. (1956) The Functions of Social ConflictLondon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

59
Cotran, Eugene (1966) ‘The Place and Future of Customary Law in East Africa’ in East African
Law Today.

Cotterrell, Roger (1992) The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal

PhilosophyPhiladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Cotterrell, Roger (1995) Law's CommunityOxford: Oxford University Press.

Cotterrell, Roger (1997) ‘The Concept of Legal Culture’ in Nelken, David (ed.) Chapter 1.

Cotterrell, Roger (1998) ‘Why Must Legal Ideas be Interpreted Sociologically?’ 25 Jo. Law and
Society171.

Cotterrell, Roger (1999) Emile Durkheim: Law in a Moral DomainEdinburgh: Edinburgh

University Press.

Cotterrell, Roger (2006) Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social
TheoryAldershot: Ashgate.

Cotterrell, Roger and Woodliffe, J. C. (1974) ‘The Teaching of Jurisprudence in British

Universities’ JSPTL (NS) 89.

Cownie, Fiona (2004) Legal Academics: Culture and IdentitiesOxford: Hart.

Cownie, FionaBradney, Anthony, and Burton, Mandy (2003) English Legal System in Context
(3rd edn) London: LexisNexis (4th edn 2007).

Craig, Paul (1997) ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law’ Public Law467.

Craig, Paul and Harlow, Carol (eds.) (1998) Lawmaking in the European UnionLondon: Kluwer
Law International.

Cranston, Maurice (1973) What are Human Rights? (2nd edn) London: Bodley Head.

Crisp, Roger and Hooker, Brad (eds.) (2000) Well-Being and Morality: Essays in Honour of
James GriffinOxford: Clarendon Press.

Cusson, M. (2001) ‘Social Control’ 4 IESBS2730.

Czarnota, Adam, Krygier, Martin, and Sadurski, Wojciech (eds.) (2005) Rethinking the Rule of
Law under CommunismBudapest: Central University Press.

D'Agostino, Fred (2003) Incommensurability and Commensuration: The Common

DenominatorAldershot: Ashgate.

60
Dalgano, Melvin (1975) ‘The Contemporary Significance of Bentham's Anarchical Fallacies: A
Reply to William Twining’ 61 Archiv fur Rechts–und Sozialphilosophie357.

Dam, Kenneth (2006b) ‘The Law-Growth Nexus: The Rule of Law and Economic Development’
Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Damaska, Mirjan (1986) The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to
the Legal ProcessNew Haven: Yale University Press.

Daniels, Norman (ed.) (1975) Reading Rawls: Critical Studies of A Theory Of JusticeOxford:
Blackwell.

Darwin, Charles (1859) On the Origin of the Species Facsim. 1st edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press. (1st edn) London: John Murray.

Daube, David (1956) Forms of Roman LegislationOxford: Clarendon Press.

Dauvergne, Catherine (ed.) (2003) Jurisprudence for an Interconnected GlobeAldershot: Ashgate.

Davis, J. (ed.) (1982) Religious Organization and Religious ExperienceLondon and New York:
Academic Press.

Davitt, S. J. Father Thomas (1963/4) ‘Basic Value Judgments in Preliterate Custom and Law’,

Barry, W. T. (1991) The Trouble with ConfucianismCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Burca, Grainne and Scott, Joanne (eds.) (2006) Law and New Governance in the EU and the
USOxford: Hart.

Mulder, Richard (2004) ‘Jurimetrics – New Impulses’ Berkeley: Gruter Institute www.gruter.org.

Soto, Hernando (1989) The Other PathLondon: I. B. Tauris.

Soto, Hernando (2000) The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails
Everywhere ElseNew York: Basic Books.

Deakin, Simon (2005) ‘Social Rights in a Globalized Economy’ in Alston, (ed.) Chapter 2.

Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte (2006) Who Believes in Human Rights? Reflections on the European
ConventionCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Deng, Francis M. (1971) Tradition and Modernization: A Challenge for Law among the Dinka of
the Sudan (2nd edn) New Haven: Yale University Press.

61
Deng, Francis M. (1972) The Dinka of the SudanNew York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston Prospect
Heights, IL.: Waveland Press.

Deng, Francis M. (1973) The Dinka and their SongsOxford: Clarendon Press.

Deng, Francis M. (1974) Dinka FolktalesNew York: African Publishing Co.

Deng, Francis M. (1978) Africans of Two WorldsNew Haven: Yale University Press.

Deng, Francis M. (1980) Dinka CosmologyLondon: Ithaca Press.

Deng, Francis M. (1982) The Recollections of Babo NimirLondon: Ithaca Press.

Deng, Francis M. (1986a) Seed of Redemption: A Political NovelNew York: Lilian Barber Press.

Deng, Francis M. (1986b) The Man Called Deng Majok: A Biography of Power, Polygyny and
ChangeNew Haven: Yale University Press.

Deng, Francis M. (1989) Cry of the OwlNew York: Lilian Barber Press.

Deng, Francis M. (1993) Protecting the Dispossessed: A Challenge to the International

CommunityWashington DC: Brookings Institution.

Deng, Francis M. (1995) War of Visions: Conflict of Identities in the Sudan.

Deng, Francis M. (1998) ‘The Cow and the Thing Called “What”: Dinka Cultural Perspectives on
Wealth and Poverty’, 52 Jo. of International Affairs101.

Deng, Francis M. (1998) Sudan Democratic Gazette 5/98.

Deng, Francis M. (1998) Sudan Democratic Gazette 8/98.

Deng, Francis M. (1998) Sudan Democratic Gazette 9/98.

Deng, Francis M. (1999) Sudan Democratic Gazette 3/99.

Deng, Francis M. (1999) Sudan Democratic Gazette 6/99.

Deng, Francis M. (1999) Sudan Democratic Gazette 10/99.

Deng, Francis M. (2000) ‘The Cause of Justice Behind Civil Wars’ in Amadiume,

Deng, Francis M. (2006) Talking It Out: Stories in Negotiating Human RelationsLondon: Kegan.

Deng, Francis M. and An Na'im, Adbdullahi (eds.) (1990) Human Rights in Africa: Cross-
Cultural PerspectivesWashington

62
Deng, Francis M. and An Na'im, Abdullahi (1997) Their Brothers' Keepers: Regional Initiative
for Peace in the SudanAddis Ababa: Inter-Africa group.

Deng, Francis M. and Prosser, Gifford (1987) The Search for Peace and Unity in the
SudanWashington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Press.

Deng, Francis M. and Daly, F. M. (1989) Bonds of Silk: The Human Factor in the British
Administration of the SudanEast Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

Deng, Francis M. and Zartman, William (eds.) (1991) Conflict Resolution in AfricaWashington
DC: Brookings Institution.

Deng, Francis M. and Minear, Larry (eds.) (1992) The Challenges of Famine Relief: Emergency
Operations in the SudanWashington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Deng, Francis M. and Lyons, Terrence (1998) African ReckoningWashington DC: The Brookings
Institution.

Denman, Thomas (1824) Review of Dumont's Traité des Preuves Judiciaires 40 Edinburgh
Review169.

Derrett, J. Duncan M. (1961–62) ‘The Ministration of Hindu Law by the British’, 4 Comparative
Studies in Society and History10.

Derrett, J. Duncan M. (1968) An Introduction to Legal SystemsLondon: Sweet and Maxwell.

Derrett, J. Duncan M. (1999) ‘An Indian Metaphor in St. John's Gospel’, 9 Jo. Royal Asiatic
Society271.

Devlin, Patrick (1965) The Enforcement of Morals (Maccabaean Lecture in Jurisprudence (1959))
Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dews, Peter (ed.) (1999) Habermas: A Critical ReaderOxford: Blackwell.

Dezalay, Yves & Sugarman, David (eds.) (1995) Professional Competition and Professional
Power: Lawyers, Accountants and the Social Construction of MarketsLondon: Routledge.

Dezalay, Yves and Bryant, G. Garth (2002a) Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation
and Importation of a New Legal OrthodoxyAnn Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G. (2002b) The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers.

,DFID (Department for International Development (UK)(2002) Draft Evaluation Guidelines

www.eldis.org./static/DOC 13188.

63
Dhavan, Rajeev, Kibble, Neil and Twining, William (eds.) (1989) Access to Legal Education and
the Legal ProfessionLondon: Butterworth.

Diamond, Jared (2005) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or SucceedNew York: Vintage
Penguin.

Dias, Clarence J., Luckham, Robin, Lynch, Dennis O., Paul, James C. N. (eds.) (1981) Lawyers in
the Third World: Comparative and Developmental PerspectivesUppsala: Institute for African
Studies and New York: International Legal Center.

Dias, R. W. M. (1964, 1st edn)(1976, 4th edn)(1985, 5th edn) JurisprudenceLondon: Butterworth.

Dias, R. W. M. (1979, 3rd edn) Bibliography of JurisprudenceLondon: Butterworth.

Dias, R. W. M. and Hughes, Graham J. B. (1957) JurisprudenceLondon: Butterworth.

Dickinson, Laura (ed.) (2007) International Law and Society: Empirical Approaches to Human
RightsAldershot: Ashgate.

Dine, Janet (2005a) ‘Researching globalisation’ 61 Amicus Curiae7.

Dine, Janet (2005b) Companies, International Trade and Human RightsNew York: Cambridge
University Press.

Dinwiddy, John (2004) Bentham: Selected Essays of John DinwiddyTwining, William (ed.)
Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Dixon, Julie (2001) Evaluation and Legal Theory. Oxford: Hart.

Drobnig, Ulrich and Rehbinder, Manfred (eds.) (1994) Rechtrealismus, multikulturelle

Duff, R. Anthony (ed.) (1998) Philosophy and the Criminal LawCambridge: Cambridge
University Press.

Dumont, Étienne (1802) see Bentham, Jeremy (1802).

Dunning, John H. (ed.) (2003) Making Globalization GoodOxford: Oxford University Press.

Duxbury, Neil (1995) Patterns of American JurisprudenceOxford: Oxford University Press.

Duxbury, Neil (2003) ‘A Century of Legal Studies’ in Cane, and Tushnet, (eds.) Chapter 42.

Dworkin, Ronald (1977) Taking Rights SeriouslyLondon: Duckworth.

Dworkin, Ronald (1980/1985) ‘Is Wealth a Value?’ 9 Jo. Legal Studies191 reprinted in A Matter
of Principle (1985) Chapter 12.
64
Dworkin, Ronald (1985) A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Dworkin, Ronald (1986) Law's Empire. London: Fontana.

Dworkin, Ronald (2002) ‘Thirty Years On’, 115 Harvard Law Rev. 1655.

Dworkin, Ronald (2006a) ‘Hart and the Concepts of Law’ 119 Harvard Law Review Forum95.

Dworkin, Ronald (2006b) Justice in RobesCambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap Press.

Dyzenhaus, David (2006) The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of EmergencyCambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

East African Law Today (1966) London: BIICL.

,East African Royal Commission (1955) Report Cmnd. 9475 London: HMSO.

Easterley, William (2006) The White Man's BurdenOxford: Oxford University Press.

Economides, Kim (1996) ‘Law and Geography: New Frontiers’ in Thomas, Philip (ed.).

Edge, Ian (ed.) (1996) Islamic Law and Legal TheoryNew York: New York University Press.

Edge, Ian (ed.) (2000) Comparative Law in Global PerspectiveArdley, NY: Transnational
Publishers.

Edwards, Paul (ed.) (1967) Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: MacMillan and Free Press.

Eekelaar, John (1978/1984) Family Law and Social PolicyLondon: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

El-Gamal, Mahmoud A. (2006) Islamic Finance: Law, Economics and PracticeNew York:
Cambridge University Press.

Ellickson, Robert (1991) Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle DisputesCambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.

Ellickson, Robert C. (1998) ‘Law and Economics Discovers Social Norms’ 27 Journal of Legal
Studies537.

Ellis, Anthony (ed.) (1985) Ethics and International RelationsManchester: Manchester University
Press.

Empson, William (1947) Seven Types of Ambiguity (2nd edn) London: Chatto and Windus.

Endicott, Timothy (2000) Vagueness in LawOxford: Oxford University Press.

65
Epstein, A. L. (ed.) (1967) The Craft of Social AnthropologyLondon: Tavistock.

Escamilla, M. and Saavedra, M. (eds.) (2005) Law and Justice in Global SocietyGranada:
University of Granada. (World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy).

Espeland, Wendy and Sauder, Michael (2007) ‘Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures
Create Social Worlds’ 113 Am. Jo. Sociology1.

Espeland, Wendy and Stevens, Mitchell L. (1998) ‘Commensuration as a Social Process’, 24

Annual Review of Sociology313.

Esposito, John L (ed.) (1999) The Oxford History of IslamNew York: Oxford University Press.

Esposito, John L. and John, H. Voll (eds.) (2001) Makers of Contemporary IslamNew York:
Oxford University Press.

Estin, Ann L and Stark, Barbara (2007) Global Issues in Family LawSt Paul, MN: West

Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.)(2006) (2nd edn) International LawOxford: Oxford University Press.

Evans, P. B. (2001) ‘Development and the State’ 6 IESBS3557.

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937) Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Among the AzandeOxford: Oxford
University Press.

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1940); The NuerOxford: Oxford University Press.

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1956) Nuer ReligionOxford: Oxford University Press.

Ewald, William (1995a) ‘Comparative Jurisprudence I: What was it like to try a rat?’ 143 U.
Pennsylvania L. Rev. 1889.

Ewald, William (1995b) ‘Comparative Jurisprudence II: The Logic of Legal Transplants’ 43
American. Jo. Comparative Law489.

Ewing, Alfred C. (1929) The Morality of PunishmentLondon: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner.

Ewing, Keith (1994) ‘The Bill of Rights Debate: Democracy or Juristocracy in Britain’ in Ewing,
Gearty, and Hepple (eds.).

Ewing, Keith and Gearty, Conor (1990) Freedom under Thatcher: Civil Liberties in Modern
BritainOxford: Oxford University Press.

Ewing, KeithGearty, Conor, and Hepple, Bob (eds.) (1994) Human Rights and Labour
LawLondon: Mansell.

66
Falk, Richard (1998) Law in an Emerging Global Village. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

Falk, Richard (2002) ‘Reframing the Legal Agenda of World Order in the Course of a Turbulent
Century’ in Likosky, (ed.) Chapter 17.

Fallers, Lloyd (1969) Law Without PrecedentChicago: University of Chicago Press.

Faundéz, Julio, Footer, Mary, and Norton, Joseph (eds.) (2000) Governance, Development and
GlobalizationLondon: Blackstone.

Fazio, Sylvia (2007) The Harmonization of International Commercial LawAlphen, Ned.: Kluwer
International.

Feeley, Malcolm (1976) ‘The Concept of Laws in Social Science: A Critique and Notes on an
Expanded View’ 10 Law and Society Rev. 497.

Fernandes, Edesio (ed.) (1995) Law and Urban Change in BrazilAldershot: Avebury.

Fernandes, Edesio and Varley, Ann (eds.) (1998) Illegal Cities: Law and Urban Change in
Developing CountriesLondon: Zed Books.

Feteris, Eveline T. (1999) Fundamentals of Legal ArgumentationDordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Finnis, John (1972) ‘Some Professorial Fallacies About Rights’, 4 Adelaide L. Rev. 377.

Finnis, John (1980) Natural Law and Natural RightsOxford: Clarendon Press.

Finnis, John (1983) Fundamentals of EthicsOxford: Oxford University Press.

Lisa, Fishbayn (1999) ‘Litigating the Right to Culture: Family Law in the New South Africa’, 13
Int. Jo. of Law, Policy, and the Family147.

Fisher, Roger, Ury, William, with Patten, Bruce (ed.) (1991) Getting To Yes (2nd edn) New
York: Penguin.

Fishkin, James (1985) ‘Theories of Justice and International Relations: The Limits of Liberal
Theory’ in Beitz, et al. (ed.).

Fitzpatrick, Peter (1992) The Mythology of Modern LawLondon: Routledge.

Fletcher, George (1993) Loyalty: An Essay on the Morality of RelationshipsNew York: Oxford
University Press.

Fletcher, George (1996) Basic Concepts of Legal Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Flood, John (1983) Barristers' ClerksManchester: Manchester University Press.

67
Flood, John (1996) ‘Megalwayering in the Global Order: The Cultural, Social and Economic
Transformation of Global Legal Practice’ 3 Int. Jo Legal Profession169.

Flood, John (2002) ‘Globalisation and Global Elites: Transnational Legal Processes, Globalisation
and Power Disparities’ in Likosky, (ed.) p. 114.

Flood, John (2007) ‘Lawyers as Sanctifiers: The Role of Elite Law Firms in International
Business Transactions’ 14 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies35.

Flood, John and Sosa, Fabian (2008) ‘Lawyers, Law Firms and the Stabilization of Transnational
Business’ Northwestern Jo. of International Law and Business.

Fontana, David (2001) ‘Refined Comparativism in Constitutional Law’ 49 U.C.L.A. L. Rev. 539.

,Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2005) Food Insecurity in the WorldRome: FAO.

Foot, Rosemary (2000) Rights Beyond Borders: The Global Community and the Struggle over
Human Rights in ChinaOxford: Oxford University Press.

Foster, Nick (ed.) (2006) Symposium on Glenn's Legal Traditions of the World, (2nd edn) 1 Jo.
Comparative Law100.

Franck, Thomas M. (1972) ‘The New Development: Can American Law and Legal Institutions
Help Developing Countries?’ 12 Wisconsin L. Rev. 767.

Franck, Thomas M. (1995) Fairness in International Law and InstitutionsOxford: Oxford

University Press.

Frandberg, Ake and Hoecke, Mark (eds.) (1998), The Structure of Law. Uppsala: Iustus Forlag.

Freedom House (2005) Freedom of the Press: A Global Survey of Media IndependenceNew
York: Freedom House.

Freeman, Michael (ed.) (2006) Law and Sociology 8 Current Legal Issues 49 and Oxford: Oxford
University Press.

Freeman, Michael D. A. (2001) Lloyd's Introduction to Jurisprudence (7th edn) London: Sweet
and Maxwell.

Frey, B. S. and Schneider, F. (2001) ‘Informal and Underground Economics’ 11 IESBS7441.

Friedman, Lawrence (1985) A History of American Law (2nd edn) New York: Simon and
Schuster.

Friedman, Lawrence (1989) ‘Law Lawyers and Popular Culture’ 98 Yale Law Jo. 1579.

68
Friedman, Lawrence (1994) ‘The Law and Society Movement’ 38 Stanford L. Rev. 763.

Friedman, Lawrence (1996) ‘Borders: On the Emerging Sociology of Transnational Law’ 32

Stanford Jo. Int. Law65.

Friedman, Lawrence (1997) ‘The Concept of Legal Culture: A Reply’ in Nelken, David (ed.)
Chapter 2.

Friedman, Lawrence (2002) American Law in the Twentieth CenturyNew Haven: Yale University
Press.

Friedman, Lawrence (2005) ‘Law and Society Comes of Age’ 1 Annual Review of Law and
Social Science1.

Lawrence, Friedman and Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio (eds.) (2003) Legal Culture in the Age of
Globalization: Latin America and Latin EuropeStanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Friedmann, Wolfgang (1960) Legal Theory (4th edn) London: Stevens.

Friedmann, Wolfgang (1964) ‘The Role of Law and the Functions of Lawyers in Developing
Countries’ 17 Vanderbilt L. Rev. 181.

Friedrich, Carl (1972) Tradition and AuthorityLondon: Macmillan.

Froomkin, A. Michael (2002) ‘ICANN's UDRP: Its Causes and (Partial) Cures’ 67 Brooklyn L.
Rev. 605.

Froomkin, A. Michael (2003) ‘Habermas@discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of

Cyberspace’ 116 Harvard L Rev. 749.

Froomkin, Michael, Wu, Tim, Dyson, Esther, and Gross, David (2007) ‘On the Future of Internet
Governance’ 101 Proceedings of American Society of International Law.

Fuchs, Alan (1992) ‘Review of T. Pogge Realizing Rawls’ 10 Ethics395.

Fuller, Lon (1949) ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’ 62 Harvard L. Rev. 616.

Fuller, Lon. L. (1957–8) ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart’, 71
Harvard Law Review630.

Fuller, Lon. L. (1969) The Morality of Law (2nd edn) New Haven: Yale University Press.

Galanter, Marc (1974) ‘Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculation on the Limits of Legal
Change’ 9 Law and Society Rev. 95.

69
Galanter, Marc (1981) ‘Justice in Many Rooms: Private Ordering and Indigenous Law’ 19 Journal
of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law1.

Galanter, Marc (1991) Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India (rev. edn.)
Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Galanter, Marc (1992) The Debased Debate on Civil Justice. University of Wisconsin Dispute
Processing Research Papers, No. 10.

Galanter, Marc (1998) ‘Oil Strike in Hell: Contemporary Legends about the Civil Justice System’,
40 Arizona L. Rev. 717.

Galanter, Marc (2005) Lowering the Bar: Lawyer Jokes and Legal CultureMadison, WI:
University of Wisconsin Press.

Galanter, Marc and Trubek, David (1974) ‘Scholars in Self-estrangement: Some Reflections on
the Crisis of Law and Development Studies in the United States’ 14 Wisconsin L. Rev. 1062.

Galanter, Marc and Palay, Thomas (1991) Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the
Big Law FirmChicago: University of Chicago Press.

Galison, Peter (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.

Gallie, W. B. (1956) ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society167.

Galligan, Denis (2007) Law in Modern SocietyOxford: Oxford University Press.

Galligan, Denis (ed.) (1995) Socio-Legal Studies in Context: The Oxford Centre, Past and
FutureOxford: Blackwell.

Gardner, James A. (1980) Legal imperialism: American Lawyers and Foreign Aid in Latin
AmericaMadison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Gardner, John P. (ed.) (1990) United Kingdom law in the 1990s: Comparative and Common Law
Studies f

Gardner, John P. (ed.) (1997) Human Rights as General Norms and a State's Right to Opt Out:
Reservations and Objections to Human Rights ConventionsLondon: BIICL.

Garth, Bryant and Sterling, Joyce (1998) ‘From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping the
Last Stages of the Social Activist State’ 32 Law and Society Rev. 409.

70
Gavison, Ruth (ed.) (1987) Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of HLA
HartOxford: Oxford

Gearty, Conor (2004) Principles of Human Rights AdjudicationOxford: Oxford University Press.

Gearty, Conor (2005) ‘Human Rights in an Age of Counter-Terrorism: Injurious, Irrelevant or

Indispensable?’ 58 Current Legal Problems25.

Gearty, Conor (2006) Can Human Rights Survive? (Hamlyn Lectures) Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.

Gearty, Conor (2007) ‘Reply’ Symposium Public Law227.

Geertz, Clifford (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology, New
York: Basic Books.

Gellner, Ernest (1959/1978) Words and Things. London: Routledge.

Gerber, David J. (2004) ‘The Common Core of European Private Law: The Project and Its Books’
52 American Jo. Of Comparative Law995.

Gessner, Volkmar and Nelken, David (eds.) (2007) European Ways of Law: Towards a European
Sociology of LawOxford: Hart.

Geuss, Raymond (2001) History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gevurtz, Franklin A. (ed.) (2006–) Global Issues SeriesSt Paul, MN: West.

Gewirth, Alan (1988) ‘Ethical Universalism and Particularism’, LXXXV The Journal of
Philosophy288.

Ghai, Dharam and Ghai, Yash (1971) Asians in East and Central AfricaLondon: Minority Rights
Group, (reprinted in Whitaker, (ed.), (1974)).

Ghai, Yash (1967) ‘Independence and Safeguards in Kenya’ 3 East African Law Jo. 177.

Ghai, Yash (1974) ‘The Asian Minorities of East and Central Africa’ in Whitaker, (ed.).

Ghai, Yash (1986) ‘Legal Radicalism, Professionalism and Social Action: Reflections on
Teaching Law in Dar-es-Salaam’ in Shivji, (ed.), Chapter 3.

Ghai, Yash (1987) ‘Law, Development and African Scholarship’ 50 M. L. R750.

Ghai, Yash (1993) ‘Asian Perspectives on Human Rights’ 23 Hong Kong L.Jo. 342.

Ghai, Yash (1995) ‘The Politics of Rights in Asia’ in Wilson, G. P. (ed.) p. 203.
71
Ghai, Yash (1997a) ‘Sentinels of Liberty or Sheep in Woolf's Clothing? Judicial Politics and the
Hong Kong Bill of Rights’ 60 Modern Law Rev. 459.

Ghai, Yash (1997b) ‘The Rule of Law and Capitalism: Reflections on the Basic Law’ in Wacks,
(ed.) Chapter 12.

Ghai, Yash (1998a) ‘Human Rights and Asian Values’ 9 Public Law Review168.

Ghai, Yash (1998b) ‘Rights, Duties and Responsibilities’ in Cauquelin, , Lim, and Mayer-Konig,
(eds) Chapter 2.

Ghai, Yash (1998c) Asian Human Rights Charter: A People's CharterHong Kong: Asian Human
Rights Commission.

Ghai, Yash (1999a) Hong Kong's New Constitutional Order (2nd edn) Hong Kong: Hong Kong
University Press.

Ghai, Yash (1999b) ‘Rights, Social Justice and Globalization in East Asia’ in Bauer, and Bell,
(eds.) Chapter 10.

Ghai, Yash (2000a) Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Competing Claims in Multi-ethnic
StatesCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ghai, Yash (2000b) ‘Universalism and Relativism: Human Rights as a Framework for
Negotiating Interethnic Claims’ 21 Cardozo L Rev. 1095.

Ghai, Yash (2003a) Public Participation and Minorities (Report) London: Minority Rights Group
International.

Ghai, Yash (2003b) ‘Constitution-making in a new Iraq’ in Ghai, , Lattimer, and Said, 27.

Ghai, Yash (2005) ‘A Journey Around Constitutions’ (Beinart Lecture, University of Capetown,
2002) 122 S.African L. Jo. 804.

Ghai, Yash (forthcoming) ‘Redesigning the State for Right Development’.

Ghai, Yash and McAuslan, Patrick (1970) Public Law and Political Change in Kenya: A Study of
the Legal Framework of Government from Colonial Times to the PresentNairobi: Oxford
University Press.

Ghai, YashLattimer, Mark and Said, Yahia (2003) Building Democracy in Iraq (Report) London:
Minority Rights Group International.

72
Ghai, Yash (ed.) (1991) Put Our World to RightsLondon: Commonwealth Human Rights
Initiative.

Ghai, Yash and Cottrell, Jill (eds.) (2004) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Practice: The
Role of Judges in Implementing Economic, Social and Cultural RightsLondon: Interights.

Ghali, Boutros Boutros (1993) ‘Human Rights.

Ghosh, Amitav (2005) The Hungry TideLondon: Harper Collins.

Gibbs, James P. (1989) Control: Sociology's Central NotionUrbana: University of Illinois Press.

Giddens, Anthony (1990) The Consequences of ModernityStanford: Stanford University Press.

Glendon, Mary Ann (1991) Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political DiscourseNew York:
The Free Press.

Glendon, Mary Ann (2001) A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal
Declaration of Human RightsNew York: Random House.

Glenn, H. Patrick (1987) ‘Persuasive Authority’ 32 McGill L. Jo. 261.

Glenn, H. Patrick (2001) ‘Are Legal Traditions Incommensurable?’ 49 Am. Jo. Comp. Law133.

Glenn, H. Patrick (2003a) ‘A Transnational Concept of Law’ in Cane, and Tushnet, (eds.), p. 839.

Glenn, H. Patrick (2003b) ‘The Nationalist Heritage’ in Legrand, and Munday, (eds.) Chapter 4.

Glenn, H. Patrick (2004) Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law (2nd edn.)
(1st edn, 2000) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Glenn, H. Patrick (2007a) ‘Legal Traditions and Legal Traditions’ 2 Jo. Comparative Law69.

Glenn, H. Patrick (2007b) Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law (3rd edn)
Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goffman, Erving (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday LifeNew York: Anchor.

Goldman, Alvin (1986) Epistemology and CognitionCambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Goldman, David B. (2007) Globalisation and the Western Legal Tradition: Recurring Patterns of
Law and AuthorityCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodale, Mark and Merry, Sally (2007) The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law Between
the Global and the LocalNew York: Cambridge University Press.

73
Goode, Roy (1998) Commercial Law in the Next Millennium Hamlyn Lectures. London: Sweet
and Maxwell.

Goodman, Nelson (1955) Fact, Fiction and ForecastCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Goodrich, Peter and Carlson, David G. (eds.) (1998) Law and the Postmodern Mind:
Psychoanalysis and JurisprudenceAnn Arbor: Michigan University Press.

Goody, Jack (2004) Islam in EuropeCambridge: Polity Press.

Goold, Benjamin J. and Lazarus, Liora (eds.) (2007) Security and Human RightsOxford: Hart.

Gordley, James (1991) The Philosophical Foundations of Modern Contract Doctrine. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.

,Government of Singapore, (1991) Shared Values Cm 1 of 1991, Singapore: Government Printers.

Gray, Christopher B. (ed.) (1999) The Philosophy of Law: An EncyclopediaNew York: Garland.

Gray, John C. (1909) The Nature and Sources of LawNew York: Columbia University Press.

Graziadei, Michele (2003) ‘The functionalist heritage’ in Legrand, and Munday, (eds.), p. 100

Green, Leslie (2005) ‘General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay’ 25 Oxford Jo. Legal
Studies565.

Green, Maria (2001) ‘What We Talk About When We Talk About Indicators: Current Approaches
to Human Rights Measurement’ 23 Human Rights Qtrly1062.

Greenberg, Karen J. (ed.) (2006) The Torture Debate in AmericaNew York: Cambridge
University Press.

Greenhalgh, TrishaRobert, Glenn, Bate, Paul, Kyriakidou, Olympia, Macfarlane, Fraser and
Peacock, Richard (2005) Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations: A Systematic
Literature ReviewOxford: Blackwell.

Griffin, James (1986) Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral ImportanceOxford:
Clarendon Press.

Griffin, James (1996) Value Judgement: Improving our Ethical BeliefsOxford: Oxford University
Press.

Griffin, James (2000) ‘Replies’ in Crisp, and Hooker, (eds.).

74
Griffin, James (2001a) ‘Discrepancies Between the Best Philosophical Account of Human Rights
and the International Law of Human Rights’

Griffin, James (2001b) ‘First Steps in an Account of Human Rights’ 9 European Jo. of
Philosophy306.

Griffin, James (2003a) ‘A Short Intellectual Biography’ 10 Telos157.

Griffin, James (2003b) ‘Group Rights’ in Meyer, , Paulson, , and Pogge, (eds.) Chapter 10.

Griffin, James (2008) On Human RightsOxford: Oxford University Press.

Griffiths, Anne M. (1997) In the Shadow of Marriage: Gender and Justice in an African
CommunityChicago: University of Chicago Press.

Griffiths, John (1978) ‘Is Law Important?’ 54 N.Y.U. L.Rev. 339.

Griffiths, John (1983) ‘The General Theory of Litigation – A First Step’ 5(2) Zeitschrift fur
Rechtssoziologie145.

Griffiths, John (1986) ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’ 24 Jo. Legal Pluralism1.

Griffiths, John (2003) ‘The Social Working of Legal Rules’ 48 Jo. Legal Pluralism and Unofficial
Law1.

Griffiths, John (2006) ‘The Idea of Sociology of Law and its Relation to Law and to Sociology’ in
Freeman, Michael (ed.) Chapter 4.

Griffiths, JohnWeyers, Heleen, and Adams, Maurice (2008) Euthanasia and Law in
EuropeOxford: Hart.

Gross, Oren and Ní Aoláín, Fionnuala (2006) Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in
Theory and PracticeNew York: Cambridge University Press.

Guardiola-Rivera, Oscar (2003) ‘The Question Concerning Law’ 66 Modern Law Review792.

Guest, Stephen (1997) Ronald Dworkin (2nd edn) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Gulliver, Philip (1963) Social Control in an African SocietyLondon: Routledge.

Haack, Susan (1993) Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction of EpistemologyOxford:

Blackwell.

Haack, Susan (1998) Manifesto of a Passionate ModerateChicago: University of Chicago Press.

75
Haack, Susan (2003) Defending Science Within Reason: Between Scientism and
CynicismAmherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

Haack, Susan (2005) ‘On Legal Pragmatism: Where Does ‘The Path of the Law’ Lead Us?’ 50
American Jo. of Jurisprudence71.

Habermas, Jurgen (1995) ‘Reconciliation Through the Use of Public Reason: Remarks on John
Rawls’ Political Liberalism', 92 Jo. of Philosophy109.

Habermas, Jurgen (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law
and Democracy (trs. Rehg, W.) Oxford: Polity Press.

Hailey, Lord (1938) An African Survey RIIA: Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hailey, Lord (1957) An African Survey: A Study of Problems arising in Africa South of the
SaharaLondon: Oxford University Press.

Hale, Brenda, Pearl, David, and Cooke, Elizabth (2002) (5th edn) The Family, Law and
SocietyLondon: Butterworth.

Hall, Kermitet al. (eds.) (2002) The Oxford Companion to American LawNew York: Oxford
University Press.

Halliday, Simon and Schmidt, Patrick (eds.) (2004) Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-legal
Perspectives on Human Rights in the National ContextOxford: Hart.

Halliday, Terence (1987) Beyond Monopoly. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Halliday, Terence and Karpik, C. Lucien (1997) Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political
LiberalismOxford: Oxford University Press.

Hallis, Frederick (1930) Corporate PersonalityOxford: Oxford University Press.

Halme, Miia (2007) Human Rights in Action PhD thesis, University of Helsinki.

Halme, Miia (2008) Human Rights in ActionHelsinki: University of Helsinki Press.

Halme, Miia (ed.) (2004) ‘Symposium on Law and Anthropology – An Interrelationship of

Fantasies and Utopias’ 15 Finnish Yearbook of International Law3.

Halpin, Andrew (1997) Rights and Law: Analysis and TheoryOxford: Hart.

Halpin, Andrew (2003) ‘Fundamental Legal Conceptions Reconsidered’, 16 Canadian Jo. Law
and Jurisprudence41.

76
Halpin, Andrew (2004) Definition in Criminal LawOxford: Hart.

Halpin, Andrew (2006a) ‘Glenn's Legal Traditions of the World: Some Broader Philosophical
Issues’ in Foster, (ed.), p. 116.

Halpin, Andrew (2006b) ‘Ideology and Law’ 11 Jo. Political Ideologies153.

Halpin, Andrew (2006c) ‘The Methodology of Jurisprudence: Thirty Years off the Point’ 19
Canadian Jo. Law and Jurisprudence67.

Halpin, Andrew (2007) ‘A Rejoinder to Glenn’ 2 Jo. Comparative Law88.

Hamilton, Walton (1932) ‘Institution’ 8 Enc. Soc. Sci. 84.

Hampshire, Stuart (1983) Morality and ConflictOxford: Blackwell.

Hampshire, Stuart (1989) Innocence and ExperienceLondon: Allen Lane.

Hansen, K. T. (2001) ‘Informal Sector’ 11 IESBS7450.

Harding, Christopher and Chin, L. Lim (eds.) (1999) Renegotiating Westphalia: Essays and
Commentary on the European and Conceptual Foundations of Modern International LawThe
Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Hare, R. M. (1981) Moral ThinkingOxford: Oxford University Press.

Harrington, John and Manji, Abreema (2003) ‘The Emergence of African Law as an Academic
Discipline’ 102 African Affairs, 109–34.

Harrison, Ross (1983) BenthamLondon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Hart, H. L. A. (1953) Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence (Inaugural Lecture) Oxford: Oxford
University Press (reprinted in Hart (1983) and elsewhere).

Hart, H. L. A. (1954) ‘Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence’ 70 LQR57.

Hart, H. L. A. (1957) ‘Analytic Jurisprudence in Mid-Twentieth Century: A Reply to Professor

Bodenheimer.’ 105 U. Pennsylvania L. Rev. 953.

Hart, H. L. A. (1958) ‘Dias and Hughes on Jurisprudence’ [1958] Jo. Society of Public Teachers
of Law (N.S.)143

Hart, H. L. A. (1961/1994) The Concept of Law (2nd edn including Postscript) Oxford: Oxford
University Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1963) Law, Liberty, and Morality. London: Oxford University Press.
77
Hart, H. L. A. (1967) ‘Problems of Philosophy of Law’ in Edwards, P. (ed.) Vol.6, p. 264
(reprinted in Hart (1983). Chapter 3).

Hart, H. L. A (1968) Punishment and ResponsibilityOxford: Oxford University Press.

Hart, H. L. A (1973a) ‘Between Utility and Rights’ reprinted in Hart (1983).

Hart, H. L. A. (1973b) ‘The Demystification of the Law’ reprinted in Hart (1982).

Hart, H. L. A. (1982) Essays on Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1983) Essays in Jurisprudence and PhilosophyOxford: Oxford University Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1987) Comment on Ronald Dworkin, ‘Legal Theory and the Problem of Sense’ in
Gavison, (ed.), p. 35.

Hart, H. L. A and Honoré, Tony (1985) Causation and the Law (2nd edn) Oxford: Oxford
University Press.

Hathaway, Barbara Drexler (1980) Julius Stone: A Bio-BiographyAustin: University of Texas

Press.

Hathaway, Oona A. (2002) ‘Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?’ 111 Yale L. Jo1935.

Hathaway, Oona A. and Koh, Harold H. (eds.) (2005) Foundations of International Law and
Politics. New York: Foundation Press.

Haupt, H-G (2001) ‘Comparative History’ 4 IESBS2397.

Hayek, Friedrich (1944) The Road to SerfdomChicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hayek, Friedrich (1979) Law, Legislation and LibertyChicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hazard, John N. and Wagner, Wenceslas J. (1974) Law in the United States in Social and
Technical RevolutionBrussels: Establissements Emile Bruylant.

Headland, Thomas, Pike, Kenneth, and Harris, Marvin (eds) (1990) Emics and Etics: The
Insider/Outsider Debate. London: Sage.

Heinz, John P., and Laumann, Edward O. (1982) Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the
BarNew York: Russell Sage; Foundation.

Held, David (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan
GovernanceStanford: Stanford University Press.

Held, David (2006) Models of Democracy (3rd edn) Stanford: Stanford University Press.
78
Heller, Thomas C. (2003) ‘An Immodest Postscript’ in Jensen and Heller.

Hendges, Phillip A. (1997) ‘An Analysis of People, For Michigan Republic, Ex Rel v. State of
Michigan’ 30 John Marshall L. Rev. 937.

Hendly, Kathryn (2001) ‘Demand for Law in Russia – A Mixed Picture’ 10 East European
Constitutional Review72.

Herrestad, Henning (1996) Formal Theories of Rights. Oslo: Juristforbundets Forlag AS.

Hilson, Chris and Downes, Tony (1999) ‘Making Sense of Rights in Community Law’ 24
European L. Rev. 121.

Himma, Kenneth Einar (2004) ‘Do Philosophy and Sociology Mix? A Non-essentialist Socio-
legal Positivist Analysis of the Concept of Law’ 24 Oxford Jo. Legal Studies717 (Review of
Tamanaha 2001).

Hirst, Paul Q. and Thompson, Grahame (1999) Globalization in QuestionCambridge: Polity Press.

Hobsbawm, Eric (1995) The Age of Capital 1848–1875, The Age of Empire 1875–1914, The Age
of Extremes 1914–1991NY: Abacus.

Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence (eds.) (1983) The Invention of TraditionCambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

Hodgkin, Thomas (1956) Nationalism in Colonial AfricaLondon: Muller.

Hoebel, E. Adamson (1954) The Law of Primitive ManCambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.

Hoebel, E. Adamson (1964) ‘Karl Llewellyn: Anthropological Jurisprude’ 18 Rutgers L. Rev.

735.

Hoffman, Donald (1995) Understanding Frank Lloyd Wright's ArchitectureNew York: Dover.

Hoffman, Roald (1995) The Same and not the SameNew York: Columbia University Press.

Hohfeld, Wesley N. (1913/1919/1964) Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial

Reasoning (re-issued Cook, W. W. (ed.) 1919, 1964) New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Hohfeld, Wesley N. (1914) ‘A Vital School of Jurisprudence and Law’ Proceedings of the 14th
Annual Meeting of AALS76.

Holder, Jane and Harrison, Carolyn (eds.) (2003) Law and GeographyOxford: Oxford University
Press.

79
Holder, Jane (2004) Environmental Assessment: The Regulation of Decision-makingOxford:
Oxford University Press.

Holmes, Oliver Wendell (1897) ‘The Path of the Law’ 10 Harvard L. Rev. 457.

Horowitz, Donald L. (1994) ‘The Qu'ran and the Common Law: Islamic Law Reform and the
Theory of Legal Change’ 42 Am Jo. Comp. L. 233 and 543.

Horwitz, Morton (1997) ‘Why is Anglo-American Jurisprudence Unhistorical?’ 17 Oxford Jo.

Legal Studies551.

Howell, Paul (1954) A Manual of Nuer LawLondon: Oxford University Press for the International
African Institute.

Howells, Geraint (1998) ‘ “Soft Law” in EC Consumer Law’ in Craig, and Harlow, (eds.) Chapter
15.

Howse, Robert (ed.) (2007) The WTO System: Law, Politics and LegitimacyLondon: Cameron
May.

Hseih, Yu-Wei (1967) ‘The Status of the Individual in Chinese Ethics’ in Moore, (ed.).

Hsu, C. Stephen (ed.) Understanding China's Legal SystemNew York: New York University
Press.

Hull, Natalie (1997) Roscoe Pound and Karl Llewellyn: Searching for an American
JurisprudenceChicago: University of Chicago Press.

Human Rights Watch (1993) Global Report on PrisonsNew York: Human Rights Watch.

Hume, David (1839) A Treatise of Human NatureLondon: John Norton (reprinted (1955) L. A.
Selby-Bigge (ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hunt, Alan (1978) The Sociological Movement in LawLondon: MacMillan.

Huntington, Samuel (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Conn: Yale
University Press.

Huntington, Samuel (1997) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World OrderNew
York: Simon and Schuster.

Hurwitz, Brian, Greenhalgh, Trisha, and Skultans, Vieda (eds.) (2004) Narrative Research in
Health and IllnessLondon: BMJ Publications.

80
Hutton, Will and Giddens, Anthony (2000) On the Edge: Living with Global CapitalismLondon:
Cape.

Huxley, Andrew (ed.) (2002) Religion, Law and TraditionLondon: Routledge Curzon.

Hyland, Richard (1996) ‘Comparative Law’ in Patterson, (ed.).

Ignatieff, Michael (ed.) (2005) American Exceptionalism and Human RightsPrinceton: Princeton
University Press.

Inoue, Kyoko (1991) MacArthur's Japanese ConstitutionChicago: University of Chicago Press.

,International Association of Democratic Lawyers (1958–81) Review of Contemporary

LawBrussels.

,International Commission of Jurists (1957–68) Journal of the International Commission of

JuristsThe Hague.

,International Commission of Jurists (1961) African Conference on the Rule of LawGeneva: ICJ

,International Commission of Jurists (1976) Human Rights in a One Party StateGeneva: ICJ.

,International Legal Center (1974) Law and Development: The Future of Law and Development
ResearchUppsala: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies and New York: ILC.

,International Legal Center (1975) Legal Education in a Changing WorldNew York and Uppsala:
ILC.

Iqbal, Munawar and Llewellyn, David (eds.) (2002) Islamic Banking and FinanceCheltenham:
Edward Elgar.

Irwin, Robert (2006) For Lust of Knowing: The Orientalists and their EnemiesLondon: Allen
Lane.

Ishay, Micheline (2004) The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization
EraBerkeley: University of California Press.

Jabine, Thomas P. and Claude, Richard (1992) Human Rights and Statistics: Getting the Record
StraightPhiladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Jackson, Bernard (2006) ‘Internal and External Comparisons of Jewish Law’ 1 Jo. Comparative
Law177.

Jackson, Frank (1998) From Metaphysics to Ethics: In Defence of Conceptual AnalysisOxford:

Oxford University Press.

81
Jagger, Trevor (2002) Britain-Tanzania Society Newsletter, Vol. 3 Issue 9.

Jagtenberg, R., Örücü, E. and Roo, A. J. (1995) Transfrontier Mobility of LawThe Hague: Kluwer
Law International.

James, Michael (ed.) (1974) Bentham and Legal Theory (reprinted from 24 Northern Ireland
Legal Quarterly (1973)) Belfast: NILQ.

James, Rudi W and Kassam, Firoz M (eds.) (1973) Law and its Administration in a One Party
State: Selected Speeches of Telford GeorgesNairobi: East Africa Literature Bureau.

Jamieson, Dale (ed.) (1999) Singer and his Critics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Jasso, Guillermina and Wegener, Berndt (1997) ‘Methods for Empirical Justice Analysis: Part I
Framework, Models and Quantitities’ 10 Social Justice Research393.

Jasso, Guillermina and Wegener, Berndt (1998) ‘Exploring the Justice of Punishments: Framing,
Expressiveness, and the Just Prison Sentence’ 11 Social Justice Research397.

Jenkins, Philip (2007a) The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity (Revised edn.)
Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jenkins, Philip (2007b) God's Continent: Christianity, Islam and Europe's Religious CrisisOxford:
Oxford University Press.

Jenks, C. Wilfrid (1958) The Common Law of MankindLondon: Stevens.

Jensen, Eric and Heller, Thomas C. (2003) Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches
to the Rule of LawStanford: Stanford University Press.

Jenson, Jane and Sousa Santos, Boventura (eds.) (2000) Globalizing Institutions: Case Studies in
Regulation and InnovationAldershot: Ashgate.

Jessup, Philip (1956) Transnational LawNew Haven: Yale University Press.

Joerges, Christian and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds.) (2006) Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade
Governance and Social RegulationOxford: Hart.

Johnson, Terence (1972) Professions and PowerLondon: MacMillan.

Johnstone, Quentin and Hopson, Dan (1967) Lawyers and Their Work: An Analysis of the Legal
Profession in the United States and EnglandIndianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Jolowicz, J. Anthony (ed.) (1970) The Division and Classification of the LawLondon: Sweet and
Maxwell.

82
Jones, William C. (2003) ‘Trying to Understand the Current Chinese Legal System’ in Stephen
Hsu, C. (ed.).

Jordana, Jacint and Levi-Faur, David (eds.) (2004) The Politics of RegulationCheltenham:
Edward Edgar.

,Judicial Studies Board (1999–) Handbook on Ethnic Minority Issueswww.jsboard.co.uk.

,Judicial Studies Board (2007) Equal Treatment Bench HandbookLondon: Judicial Studies Board.

Jung, Kim Dae (1994) ‘Is Culture Destiny?’ 73 Foreign Affairs189.

Kadish, Mortimer R. and Kadish, Sanford H. (1973) Discretion to Disobey: A study of Lawful
Departure from Legal RulesStanford: Stanford University Press.

Kagan, Robert A., Krygier, Martin and Winston, Kenneth (eds.) (2002) Legality and Community:
On the Intellectual Legacy of Philip SelznickLanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Kahn-Freund, Otto (1974/1978) ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’ (1978) in Selected
Writings 294 (originally published in (1974) 37 Modern Law Rev. 1).

Kahn-Freund, Otto (1978) Selected WritingsLondon: Stevens.

Kalman, Laura (1986) Legal Realism at Yale 1927–1960Chapel Hill: University of North
Carolina Press.

Kamp, Allen R (1995) ‘Between the Wars Social Thought: Karl Llewellyn's Legal Realism, and
the Uniform Commercial Code in Context’ 59 Albany L. Rev. 325.

Kamrava, Mehran (2006) The New Voices of Islam: Reforming Politics and ModernityLondon:
Tauris.

Kant, Immanuel (1795/2003) To Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch (trs. and ed. Humphrey,
Ted) Indianapolis: Hackett.

Kant, Immanuel (1970) Political Writings (ed. Reiss, H.) Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Karst, Kenneth (2000) ‘The Bonds of American Nationhood’ 21 Cardozo Law Rev. 1095

Kaufmann, Donald, Kray, Aart, and Mastruzzi, Massimo (July 2007) NBER Paper No. 4280.

Kay, Sean (2006) Global Security in the Twenty-first Century: The Quest for Power and the
Search for PeaceLanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.

83
Keeton, George W. (1949) The Elementary Principles of Jurisprudence (2nd edn.) London:
Pitman.

Keeton, George W. and Schwarzenberger, George (eds.) (1948) Jeremy Bentham and the
LawLondon: Stevens.

Kelly, John M. (1992) A Short History of Western Legal TheoryOxford: Oxford University Press.

Kelly, Paul (1990) Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremy Bentham and the Civil
LawOxford: Oxford University Press.

Kelsen, Hans (1945) General Theory of Law and State (trs. Wedberg, Anders) Cambridge MA:
Harvard University Press.

Kelsey, Jane (1995) Economic FundamentalismLondon: Pluto Press.

Kennedy, David (2003) ‘The Methods and the Politics’ in Legrand, and Munday, (eds.) Chapter
11.

Kennedy, David (2004) The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International

HumanitarianismPrinceton: Princeton University Press.

Kennedy, David (2006) ‘The ‘Rule of Law’ in Development Assistance: Past, Present, and
Future’ in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.).

Kennedy, Duncan (1997) A Critique of AdjudicationCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kennedy, Duncan (2006) ‘Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–2000’ in
Trubek, and Santos, .

Kent, Ann (1999) China, the United Nations, and Human Rights: The Limits of
CompliancePhiladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Khorshid, Aly (2004) Islamic Insurance: A Modern Approach to Islamic BankingLondon:

Routledge Cavendish.

Jung, Kim Dae (1994) ‘Is Culture Destiny? The Myth of Asian Anti-democratic Values’ 73
Foreign Affairs89.

King, B. E. (1963) ‘The Basic Concept of Professor Hart's Jurisprudence: the Norm out of the
Bottle’ (1963) Cambridge Law Jo. 270.

Kleingeld, Pauline (ed.) (2006) Immanuel Kant: Toward Perpetual Peace and other Writings on
Politics, Peace, and HistoryNew Haven: Yale University Press.

84
Klug, Franseca, Starmer, Keith, and Weir, Stuart (1996) The Three Pillars of Liberty: Political
Rights and Freedoms in the United KingdomLondon: Routledge.

Klug, Heinz (2000) Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism, and South Africa's Political
ReconstructionCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kocourek, Albert (1936) ‘Factors in the Reception of Law’ 10 Tulane Law Rev. 209.

Kocourek, Albert (ed.) (1941) My Philosophy of Law: Credos of Sixteen American

ScholarsBoston: Law Book Co.

Koh, Harold (2003) ‘American Exceptionalism’ 55 Stanford L.Rev. 1479.

Koniak, Susan (1996) ‘When Law Risks Madness’ 8 Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature65.

Koniak, Susan (1997) ‘The Chosen People in our Wilderness’ 95 Michigan Law Review1761.

Kontos, Alkis (ed.) (1979) Powers, Possession and Freedom: Essays in Honor of C. B.
MacPhersonToronto: University of Toronto Press.

Kornhauser, Lewis A. (2004) ‘Governance Structures, Legal Systems and the Concept of Law’ 70
Chicago-Kent L. Rev. 355.

Koschaker, Paul (1953) Europa und das römische RechtMunich: Biederstein (2nd edn 1953).

Koskenniemi, Martti (1999) ‘The Effects of Rights on Political Culture’ in Alston, Philip (ed.).

Koskenniemi, Martti (2001) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of Modern
International Law, 1870–1960New York: Cambridge University Press.

Koskenniemi, Martti (2005) From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal
ArgumentCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kroeber, Adolph E. and Kluckhohn, Clyde (1952) Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and
DefinitionsChicago: Papers of the Peabody Museum.

Kronman, Anthony (1983) Max WeberStanford: Stanford University Press.

Krygier, Martin (1986) ‘Law as Tradition’ 5 Law and Philosophy237.

Krygier, Martin (1988) ‘The Traditionality of Statutes’, 1 Ratio Juris20.

Kung, Hans (2007) Islam: Past, Present and FutureOxford: Oneworld (trs. Bowden, John).

Kuol, Monyluak Alor (1997) Administration of Justice in the (SPLA/M) Liberated Areas: Court
Cases in War-Torn Southern SudanOxford: Refugee Studies Programme.
85
Kuper, Andrew (2000) ‘Rawlsian Global Justice’, 28 Political Theory640.

Kuran, Timur (2003) ‘The Islamic Commercial Crisis: Institutional Roots of Economic
Underdevelopment in the Middle East’ 63 Jo. Economic History414.

Lando, Ole and Beale, Hugh (eds.) (2000–2003) Principles of European Contract LawThe Hague:
Kluwer Law International.

Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Schleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W. (1996) Law
and Finance (NBER Working Paper 5661) Cambridge, MA.: National Bureau of Economic
Research.

Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W. (1998) ‘Law
and Finance’ 106 Jo. Political Economy, 1113.

Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W. (1999) ‘The
quality of government’ 15 Jo. Law, Economics and Organization222.

Lacey, Nicola (1998a) Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social TheoryOxford:
Hart.

Lacey, Nicola (1998b) ‘Contingency, Coherence, and Conceptualism’ in Duff, (ed).

Lacey, Nicola (2004) A Life of H. L. A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble DreamOxford:
Oxford University Press.

Lacey, Nicola (2006) ‘Analytical Jurisprudence versus Descriptive Sociology Revisited’ 88 Texas
L. Rev. 945.

Lambsdorff, Johann G. (2007) ‘Corruption Perceptions Index 2006’ in Transparency

International, Global Corruption Report.

Larson, Magali (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological AnalysisBerkeley CA:

University of California Press.

Lasswell, Harold D. (1971) Preface to Deng, Tradition and Modernization.

Lasswell, Harold D. and McDougal, Myres S. (1943) ‘Legal Education and Public Policy’ 52
Yale Law J. 203.

Lasswell, Harold D. and McDougal, Myres S. (1964) Law, Science and Policy mimeographed
materials, New Haven.

86
Lasswell, Harold D. and McDougal, Myres S. (1992) Jurisprudence for a Free Society: Studies in
Law, Science and PolicyDordrecht: Kluwer.

Latour, Bruno (1996) Aramis or the Love of Technology (trs. Porter, Catherine) Cambridge MA:
Harvard University Press.

Layard, Richard (2005a) Happiness: Readings from a New ScienceLondon: Allen Lane.

Layard, Richard (2005b) ‘Happiness is Back’ Prospect, Issue108, March 2005, p. 22.

Lazega, Emmanuel (2001) The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanism of Cooperation
among Peers in Corporate Law PartnershipNew York: Oxford University Press.

Leach, Barton (1938) ‘The Restatements as they were in the Beginning, are Now and Perhaps
Thenceforth Shall Be’ 23 ABAJ517.

Legrand, Pierre (1996) ‘European Legal Systems are not Converging’, 45 Int. and Comp. Law
Qrtly. 52.

Leach, Barton (1997a) ‘Acts of Repression’ reprinted in Legrand (1999b) Chapter 9.

Leach, Barton (1997b) ‘Against a European Civil Code’ 60 MLR44.

Leach, Barton, (1997c) ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’, 4 Maastricht Jo. Of European
and Comparative Law111.

Leach, Barton (1999a) ‘John Henry Merryman and Comparative Legal Studies: A Dialogue’ 47
American Jo. Comparative Law3.

Leach, Barton (1999b) Fragments on Law-as-CultureDeventer: Tjeenk Willink.

Leach, Barton (2003a) ‘The Same and the Different’ in Legrand, and Munday, (eds.) at p. 240.

Legrand, Pierre and Munday, Roderick (eds.) (2003b) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and
TransitionsCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leiter, Brian (1997) ‘Is there an “American” Jurisprudence?’ (Review of Neil Duxbury's Patterns
of American Jurisprudence) 17 OJLS367.

Leiter, Brian (2004a) ‘Naturalism in Legal Philosophy’ in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Leiter, Brian (2004b) ‘The End of Empire: Dworkin and Jurisprudence in the 21st Century’, 36
Rutgers Law Jo. 165.

87
Leiter, Brian (2007) Naturalising Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and
Naturalism in Legal PhilosophyOxford: Oxford University Press.

Lester, Lord of Herne Hill and O'Cinneide, Colm, (2004) ‘The Effective Protection of Socio-
economic Rights’ in Ghai, and Cottrell, (eds.).

Lett, James (1990) ‘Emics and Etics: Notes on the Epistemology of Anthropology’ in Headland,
Pike, and Harris, (eds.) Ch. 9.1.

Levine, R. A. (2001) ‘Ethnocentrism’ 7 IESBS4852.

Levinson, Sanford (ed.) (2004) Torture: A CollectionNew York: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, William Draper (1937) Introduction to Restatement of Restitution Philadelphia American

Law Institute.

Leys, Colin (1965) ‘What is the Problem of Corruption?’ 3 J. Modern African Studies215.

Leys, Colin (1996) The Rise and Fall of Development TheoryLondon: Currey.

Lichtblau, Eric (2008) Bush's Law: The Remaking of American JusticeNew York: Pantheon.

Lienhardt, Godfrey (1958) ‘Western Dinka’ in Middleton, and Tait (eds.).

Lienhardt, Godfrey (1961) Divinity and Experience: The Religion of the DinkaOxford: Clarendon
Press.

Lienhardt, Godfrey (1964) Social AnthropologyOxford: Oxford University Press.

Lienhardt, Godfrey (1982) ‘The Dinka and Catholicism’ in Davis, (ed.).

Lijnzaad, Liesbeth (1995) Reservations to UN- Human Rights Treaties: Ratify and
Ruin?Dordrecht, Boston: M.Nijhoff.

Likosky, Michael (ed.) (2002) Transnational Legal ProcessesLondon: Butterworth.

Lindholm, Tori and Vogt, Kari (eds.) (1993) Islamic Law Reform and Human Rights; Challenges
and RejoindersCopenhagen: Nordic Human Rights Publications, Oslo.

Lindsey, Timothy (ed.) (2007) Law Reform in Developing and Transitional SocietiesAbingdon:
Routledge.

Linebaugh, Peter and Rediker, Marcus, (2000) The Many-headed Hydra: Sailors, Slaves,
Commoners and the Hidden History of the Revolutionary AtlanticLondon: Verso.

Lipton, Peter (2001) ‘Empiricism, History of’ 7 IESBS44815.

88
Liu, Sida (2006) ‘Client Influence and the Contingency of Professionalism: The Work of Elite
Corporate Lawyers in China’ 40 Law and Society Rev. 751.

Llewellyn, Karl N. (1930a) The Bramble Bush (1960 reprint), NY: Oceana.

Llewellyn, Karl N. (1930b) ‘A Realistic Jurisprudence – The Next Step’ reprinted in Llewellyn,
(1962) at p. 23.

Llewellyn, Karl N. (1931) ‘Some Realism about Realism’ reprinted in Llewellyn, (1962), at p. 42.

Llewellyn, Karl N. (1934) ‘The Constitution as an Institution’ 34 Columbia L. Rev1 (extract

reprinted in Llewellyn (1962) Chapter 10).

Llewellyn, Karl N. (1940) ‘The Normative, the Legal, and the Law-Jobs: The Problem of Juristic
Method’ 49 Yale L. J. 1355 (NLLJ).

Llewellyn, Karl N. (1949) ‘Law and the Social Sciences – Especially Sociology’ 62 Harv. L. Rev.
1286 (reprinted in Llewellyn (1962) as Chapter 15).

Llewellyn, Karl N. (1950) Law in our Society: A Horse-sense Theory of the Institution of Law
Unpublished materials, University of Chicago Law School, parts updated 1950–58. (LIS).

Llewellyn, Karl N. (1960) The Common Law Tradition: Deciding AppealsBoston: Little Brown.

Llewellyn, Karl N. (1962), Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press (JRTP).

Llewellyn, Karl N. and Hoebel, E. Adamson (1941) The Cheyenne Way. Norman: University of
Oklahoma Press (CW).

Lloyd, Dennis (1959) Introduction to Jurisprudence (1st edn) London: Stevens.

Lloyd, Dennis (ed.) (1981) Psychology in Legal Contexts: Applications and LimitationsLondon:
MacMillan.

Lloyd-Bostock, Sally (1988) Law in Practice: Applications of Psychology to Legal Decision-

making and Legal SkillsLondon: Routledge.

Lloyd-Bostock, Sally (ed.) (1981) Psychology in Legal ContextsLondon: Macmillan.

Lockwood, Matthew (2005) The State They're In: An Agenda for International Action on Poverty
in AfricaLondon: IDTG Publishing.

Lombay, Julian (1998) ‘Free Movement of Persons, Recognition of Qualifications, and Working
Conditions’ 47 International & Comparative Law Quarterly224.

89
Lombay, Julian (2001) ‘Lawyer Ethics in the Twenty-first Century: The Global Practice
Reconciling Regulatory and Deontological Differences – The European Experience’ 34
Vanderbilt Jo. of Transnational Law907.

Lombay, Julian (2004) ‘The Free Movement of Persons’ 53 International & Comparative Law
Quarterly479.

Lord, Christopher (2004) A Democratic Audit of the European UnionBasingstoke: Palgrave

Macmillan.

Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds.) (2007) The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent
Power and Constitutional FormOxford: Oxford University Press.

Lustgarten, Lawrence (2006) ‘Human Rights: Where Do we Go from Here?’ 69 MLR843.

Lyons, David (1973/1991) In the Interest of the GovernedOxford: Oxford University Press.

Macauley, Stuart (1963) ‘Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study’ 28

American Sociological Rev. 28.

Macauley, Stuart, (1979) Review of Merryman, Clark and Friedman in 29Am. Jo. Comp.L542.

MacCormack, Geoffrey (1985) ‘Historical Jurisprudence’ 5 Legal Studies251.

MacCormick, Neil (1981a) H. L. A. HartLondon: Edward Arnold.

MacCormick, Neil (1981b).‘Law, Morality and Positivism’ 1 Legal Studies131.

MacCormick, Neil (1999) Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European
CommonwealthOxford: Oxford University Press.

MacCormick, Neil (2007) Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal TheoryOxford: Oxford

University Press.

MacCormick, Neil (2008) H.L.A. Hart (2nd edn) Stanford: Stanford University Press.

MacCormick, Neil and Bankowski, Zenon (eds.) (1989) Enlightenment, Rights and
RevolutionAberdeen: Abderdeen University Press.

MacCormick, Neil (ed.) (1997) Constructing Legal Systems: ‘European Union’ in Legal Theory.
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

MacCormick, Neil and Summers, Robert (eds) (1991) Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative
Study. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

90
MacCormick, Neil and Summers, Robert (eds.) (1997) Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative
Study. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

MacCormick, Neil and Twining, William (1986), ‘Theory in the Law Curriculum’ LTCL Chapter
13 reprinted in LIC (1997), Chapter 7.

Machura, Stefan (2001) ‘German Sociology of Law’ 32 The American Sociologist41.

Mack, Mary (1962) Jeremy Bentham: An Odyssey of Ideas 1748–1792London: Heinemann.

Maine, Sir Henry Sumner (1861) Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society
and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th edn 1884) London: J. Murray.

Mair, Lucy (1962) Primitive GovernmentHarmondsworth: Penguin.

Maitland, Frederick W. (1936) Selected Essays (eds. Hazeltine, H. D., Lapslely, G. and Winfield,
P. H.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maliyamkono, T. L. and Bagachwa, M. S. D. (1990) The Second Economy in TanzaniaLondon: J.

Currey.

Mallat, Chibli (1993) The Renewal of Islamic LawCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mallat, Chibli (2000) ‘Commercial Law in the Middle East: Between Old Transactions and
Modern Business’ 48 American Jo. Comparative Law81.

Manji, Abreema (2002) ‘Of the Laws of Kenya and Burials and All That’ 14 Law and
Literature463.

Manji, Abreema (2006) The Politics of Land Reform in Africa: From Communal Tenure to Free
MarketsLondon: Zed Books.

Maritain, Jacques (1951) Man and the StateChicago: University of Chicago Press.

Maritain, Jacques (1954) The Rights of Man and Natural LawLondon: Bles.

Markesenis, Basil (1997) Foreign Law and Comparative Methodology. Hart: Oxford.

Markesenis, Basil (2001) ‘Unity or Division: The Search for Similarities’ 54 Current Legal
Problems591.

Markovits, Inga (1989) ‘Playing the Opposites Game: On Mirjan Damaska's The Faces of Justice
and State Authority’ 41 Stanford L. Rev. 1313.

Marmor, Andrei (1998) ‘Legal Conventionalism’ 4 Legal Theory509.

91
Martin, Rex (1993) A System of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin, Rex and Reidy, David A. (eds.) (2006) Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic
Utopia?Oxford: Blackwell.

Marx, Karl (1844) ‘On the Jewish Question’ reprinted in Waldron (1987).

Massey, I. P. (1995) Administrative LawLucknow: Eastern Book Company.

Mattei, Ugo (1994) ‘Efficiency in Legal Transplants: An Essay in Comparative Law and
Economics’ 14 Int. Rev. of Law and Economics3.

Mattei, Ugo (1997a) ‘Three Patterns of Law: Taxonomy and Change in the World's Legal
Systems’ 45 Am. Jo. Comp. Law5.

Mattei, Ugo (1997b) Comparative Law and EconomicsMichigan: University of Michigan Press.

Mayer, Ann Elizabeth (1993) ‘A Critique of An-Na'im's Assessment of Islamic Criminal Justice’
in Lindholm and Vogt Chapter 3.

Mayer, Ann Elizabeth (1994) ‘Universal Versus Islamic Human Rights: A Clash of Cultures or a
Clash with a Construct?’ 15 Michigan Jo. Int. Law307.

Mayer, Ann Elizabeth (1999) (3rd edn) Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and PoliticsBoulder:
Westview Press.

McAuslan, Patrick (1975) Land, Law and Planning: Cases, Materials and TextLondon:
Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

McAuslan, Patrick (1998) ‘Urbanization, Law and Development: A Record of Research’ in

Fernandes and Varley Chapter 2.

McAuslan, Patrick (2003) Bringing the Law Back In: Essays in Land, Law and
DevelopmentAldershot: Ashgate.

McAuslan, Patrick (2004/08) ‘In the Beginning was the Law – An Intellectual Odyssey’
Unpublished paper.

McAuslan, Patrick (2007) ‘Law and the Poor: The Case of Dar-es-Salaam’ in Philippopoulos-
Mihalopoulos, (ed.) Chapter 9.

McAuslan, Patrick (2009 forthcoming) Property and EmpireLondon: Routledge Cavendish.

McBarnet, Doreen (1978) ‘False Dichotomies in Criminal Justice Research’ in Baldwin, and
Bottomley, (eds.)

92
McBarnet, Doreen (2004a) ‘Looking for Loopholes: From Enforcement to Enforceability:
Creative Accounting and the Cross-eyed Javelin Thrower’ in McBarnet (2004) at p. 231.

McBarnet, Doreen (2004b) Crime, Compliance and ControlAldershot: Ashgate.

McCrudden, Christopher (2006) ‘Legal Research and the Social Sciences’ 122 LQR632.

McCrudden, Christopher (2007a) ‘Judicial Comparativism and Human Rights’ in Őrűcű and
Nelken Chapter 15.

McCrudden, Christopher (2007b) Buying Social Justice: Equality, Government Procurement and
Legal ChangeOxford: Oxford University Press.

McCrudden, Christopher (2007b) ‘Equality Legislation and Reflexive Regulation: a Response to

the Discrimination Law Review's Consultative Paper’ 36 Industrial Law Journal255.

McCrudden, Christopher (2008) ‘Human Dignity and the Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights’
20 European Journal of International Law 1.

McCrudden, Christopher and Chambers, Gerald (eds.) (1995) Individual Rights and the Law in
BritainOxford: Clarendon Press.

McDougal, Myres and Haber, David (1948) Property, Wealth, Land: Allocation, Planning and
Development;

McKinnon, Don (2006) ‘The Rule of Law in Today's Africa’ 32 Commonwealth Law
Bulletin649.

McLellan, David (1972) Karl Marx: Early TextsOxford: Blackwell.

Memon, Amina, Vrij, Aldert, and Bull, Ray (eds.) (2003) Psychology and Law: Truthfulness,
Accuracy, and Credibility (2nd edn) Chichester: Wylie.

Mendes, E. P. (1996) Asian Values and Human Rights: Letting the Tigers FreeOttawa: Human
Research and Education Center.

Mendelsohn, Oliver and Baxi, Upendra (eds.) (1994) The Rights of Subordinated PeoplesDelhi:
Oxford University Press.

Menski, Werner (2006a) Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and
AfricaLondon: Platinum. (2nd edn) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mercuro, Nicholas and Medema, Steven G. (eds.) (2006) Economics and the Law: From Posner to
Postmodernism and BeyondPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

93
Merry, Sally (1988) ‘Legal Pluralism’, 22 Law and Society Rev. 869.

Merry, Sally (2001) ‘Law: Anthropological Aspects’ 12 IESBS8489.

Merryman, John (1954) ‘The Authority of Authority’ 6 Stanford L. Rev. 613.

Merryman, John (1974) ‘Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation’ in Hazard, and Wagner,
(eds.).

Merryman, John (2000a) ‘Law and Development Memoirs I: The Chile Law Program’ 48
American Journal of Comparative Law481.

Merryman, John (2000b) ‘Law and Development Memoirs II: SLADE’ 48 Am. Jo Comp. L. 713.

Merryman, John (2003) ‘SLADE: A Memoir’ in Friedman and Pérez-Perdomo Chapter 14.

Merton, Robert K. (1949/1967) On Theoretical SociologyNew York: Free Press.

Mertus, Julie (1999) ‘Mapping Civil Society Transplants: A Preliminary Comparison of Eastern
Europe

Meyer, Lukas, Paulson, Stanley, and Pogge, Thomas (eds.) (2003) Rights, Culture, and the
LawOxford: Oxford University Press.

Middleton, John and Tait, David (eds.) (1958) Tribes without RulersLondon: Routledge and
Kegan Paul.

Mifsud Bonnici, Jeanne (2007) Self-Regulation in CyberspaceMalta: (Doctoral dissertation).

Mill, John Stuart (1973) A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive (Collected Works, Vols
7–8, (ed.) Robson, J. M.et al. Toronto: 1st edn, London 1843).

Miller, Daniel and Slater, Don (2000) The Internet: An Ethnographic ApproachOxford: Berg.

Miller, Jonathan (2003) ‘A Typology of Legal Transplants’ 51 Am. Jo. Comparative Law839.

Miller, Lucinda (2007) ‘The Common Frame of Reference and the Feasibility of Common

Milne, Alan (1974) ‘Bentham's Principle of Utility and Legal Philosophy’ in James, M. (ed).

Mistelis, L. (2000) ‘Regulatory Aspects: Globalization, Harmonization, Legal Transplants, and

Law Reform – Some Fundamental Observations’ 34 The International Lawyer1055.

Misztal, Bronislaw and Shupe, Anson (eds.) (1992) Religion and Politics in Comparative
Perspective: Revival of Religious Fundamentalism in East and WestWestport, CT: Praeger.

94
Molotch, Harvey (2003), Where Stuff Comes FromNew York: Routledge.

Moore, Charles (ed.) (1967) The Chinese Mind: Essentials of Chinese Philosophy and
CultureHonolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Moore, George Edward (1903) Principia EthicaCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moore, Ray. A. and Robinson, Donald L. (2004) Partners for Democracy: Crafting the Japanese
State after MacArthurOxford: Oxford University Press.

Moore, Sally Falk (1978) Law as ProcessBoston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Moore, Sally Falk (ed.) (2005) Law and Anthropology: A ReaderMalden, MA: Blackwell.

Moorehead, Richard, Sherr, Avrom, and Paterson, Alan (2003) ‘What Clients Know: Client
Perspectives on Legal Competence’ 10 Int. Jo. of the Legal Profession5.

Moosa, Ebrahim (ed.) (2000) Revival and Reform in IslamBoston, MA: One World.

Morgan, Bronwen (2007) ‘The Berlin Mega-meeting: Counter-trend to the Nuffield Inquiry
Findings?’

Morgan, Bronwen and Yeung, Karen (2007) An Introduction to Law and Regulation

Mukhopadhyay, Maitrayee and Singh, Navsharan (eds.) (2007) Gender Justice, Citizenship and
DevelopmentNew Delhi:

Mulgan, Geoff (1991) Communication and Control: Networks and the New Economics of
CommunicationNew York:

Munger, Frank (1995/6) ‘Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and
Society Research’ Paper prepared for Law and Society Summer Institute, Niagara Ontario.

Murphy, Craig N. (2006) The United Nations Development Programme:

Myrdal, Gunnar (1944) An Asian Drama: An Inquiry Into The Poverty of NationsNew York:
Pantheon.

Nader, Laura (1984) ‘A User Theory of Law’ 38 Southwestern Law Jo. 951.

Nader, Laura (2002) The Life of the Law: Anthropological ProjectsBerkeley: University of
California Press.

Nader, Laura (ed.) (1969) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.

Naffine, Ngaire (1990) Law and the SexesLondon: Allen and Unwin.
95
Nagel, Thomas (2005), ‘The Central Questions’ London Review of Books, 27, 3 Feb. 2005

Nair, M. M. (1986) A Handbook of Jurisprudence and Legal TheoryKerala: Travancore Law

House.

Nardin, Terry (1983) Law, Morality, and the Relations of StatesPrinceton: Princeton University
Press.

Nardin, Terry and Williams, Melissa (eds.) (2006) Humanitarian Intervention (Nomos XLVII)
New York:

Nash, Christopher (ed.) (1986) Narrative and CultureLondon: Routledge.

Nelken, David (1981) ‘The “Gap Problem” in the Sociology of Law: A Theoretical Overview’, 1

Nelken, David (2003) ‘Comparatists and Transferability’ in Legrand, and Munday, (eds.)

Nelken, David (2007) ‘Defining and Using the Concept of Legal Culture’ in Örücü, and Nelken,
(eds.) Chapter 5.

Nelken, David (ed.) (1997) Comparing Legal CulturesAldershot: Dartmouth.

Nelken, David and Feest, Johannes (eds.) (2001) Adapting Legal CulturesOxford: Hart.

Nelson, John H., Megill, Allan, and McCloskey, Donald M. (eds.) (1987) The Rhetoric of the
Human SciencesMadison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Newton, Scott (2007) ‘Law and Power in Rwanda in the Shadow of Genocide’ 2 Jo Comparative
Law151.

Nkrumah, Kwame (1961) I Speak of Freedom: A Statement of African IdeologyNew York:

Praeger.

Noonan, John T. (1984) BribesNew York: Macmillan.

Norman, T. J. (1990) Review of Pogge Realizing Rawls.

North, Douglass C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic

PerformanceCambridge:

Northrop, Filmer (1960) The Meeting of East and WestNew York: MacMillan.

Nussbaum, Martha (1999) Sex and Social JusticeOxford: Oxford University Press.

Nussbaum, Martha (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities

ApproachCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96
Nussbaum, Martha (2001) ‘The Costs of Tragedy: Some Moral Limits of Cost-benefit Analysis’
in Adler, and Posner, (eds.) at p. 169.

Nussbaum, Martha and Glover, Jonathan (eds.) (1995) Women, Culture and Development: A
Study of Human CapabilitiesOxford: Oxford University Press.

Nyerere, Julius (1966) Freedom and UnityDar-es-Salaam: Oxford University Press.

Nyerere, Julius (1968) Ujamaa: Essays on SocialismDar-es-Salaam: Oxford University Press.

O'Donnell, Guillermo, Vargas Cullell, Jorge and Iazzetta, Osvaldo M. (eds.) (2004) The Quality
of Democracy: Theory and ApplicationsNotre Dame, Ind:

O'Neill, Nick, Rice, Simon and Douglas, Roger (2004) Retreat from Injustice: Human Rights Law
in AustraliaLeichhart, NSW: Federation Press.

O'Neill, Onora (1974) ‘Lifeboat Earth’ 4 Philosophy and Public Affairs273 reprinted in Beitz, et
al. (1985) at p. 262.

O'Neill, Onora (1986) Faces of HungerLondon: Allen and Unwin.

O'Neill, Onora (2000) Bounds of JusticeCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

O'Neill, Onora (2002) A Question of Trust BBC Reith Lectures, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.

Ogus, Anthony (2006) Costs and Cautionary Tales: Economic Insights for the LawOxford: Hart
Publishing.

Ojwang, J. Beckton and Mugambi, J. Kanyua (eds.) (1989) The S. M. Otieno CaseNairobi:
Nairobi University Press.

Okin, Susan Moller with respondents (1999) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?Joshua, Cohen,
Matthew, Howard and Nussbaum, Martha C. (eds.) Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

Okupa, Effa (1998) International Bibliography of African Customary Law: ius non
scriptumHamburg: LIT verlag.

Ørebech, Peter, Bosselman, Fred, Bjarup, Jes, Callies, David, Chanock, Martin, and Peterson,
Hanne (2005) The Role of Customary Law in Sustainable DevelopmentCambridge: Cambridge
University Press.

Örücü, Esin (1987) ‘An Exercise on the Internal Logic of Legal Systems’, 7 Legal Studies310.

97
Örücü, Esin (1992) ‘The Impact of European Law on the Ottoman Empire and Turkey’. in
Mommsen, and Moor, (eds.) at p. 39.

Örücü, Esin (1994) ‘Diverse Issues, Continuing Debates’ in Bainham, Andrew (ed.) at p. 449.

Örücü, Esin (1995) ‘A Theoretical Framework for Transfrontier Mobility of Law’ in Jagtenberg,
R., Örücü, E. and Roo, A. J. (eds.) at p. 5.

Örücü, Esin (1996b) ‘Mixed and Mixing Systems: A Conceptual Search’ in Attwooll, Örücü,

Örücü, Esin (1999) Critical Comparative Law

Örücü, Esin (2000) ‘Turkey Facing the European Union – Old and New Harmonies’ 25 European

Örücü, Esin (2004) The Enigma of Comparative Law: Variations on a Theme for the 21st
CenturyLeiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

Örücü, Esin and Nelken, David (eds.) (2007) Comparative Law: A HandbookOxford: Hart.

Örücü, EsinAttwooll, E. and Coyle, S. (eds.) (1996) Studies in Legal Systems: Mixed and
MixingLondon: Kluwer Law International.

The Oxford Atlas of the World (1994) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Palley, Claire (1966) The Constitutional History and Law of Southern Rhodesia, 1888–1965;
With Special Reference to Imperial ControlOxford: Clarendon Press.

Palmeter, David (ed.) (2003) The WTO as a Legal System: Essays on International Trade Law
and PolicyLondon:

Parekh, Bhiku (ed.) (1993) Jeremy Bentham: Critical AssessmentsLondon: Routledge. 4 vols.

Parker, Christine, Scott, Colin, Lacey, Nicola, and Braithwaite, John (eds.) (2004) Regulating
LawOxford.

Passmore, John (1970) The Perfectibility of ManLondon: Duckworth.

Patchett, Keith (1987) ‘The Role of Law in the Development Process’ 48 Commonwealth Legal
Newsletter33.

Paton, George W. (1951, 2nd edn)(1972, 4th edn. with David Derham) A Textbook of
JurisprudenceOxford:

Patterson, Dennis (ed.) (1996) A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal TheoryOxford:
Blackwell.

98
Peacock, J. (2001) ‘Values, Anthropology of’ 24 IESBS16145.

Pearl, David and Menski, Werner, (1998) Muslim Family Law (3rd edn) London: Sweet &
Maxwell.

Peerenboom, Randall P., Petersen, Carole J. and Chen, Albert H. Y. (eds.) (2006) Human Rights
in Asia: A Comparative Study of Twelve Asian Jurisdictions, France and the USALondon: New
York:

Penner, James, Schiff, David, and Nobles, Richard (eds.) (2002) Jurisprudence and Legal
TheoryLondon:

Pérez Perdomo, Rogelio (ed.) (1993) Sociology of Law in Non-Western CountriesOnati: Onati

Perry-Kessaris, Amanda (2003) ‘Finding and Facing Facts about Legal Systems and Foreign
Direct Investment in South Asia’ 23 Legal Studies649.

Petersen, Hanne and Zahle, Henrik (eds.) (1995) Legal Polycentricity: Consequences of Pluralism
in Law. Aldershot;

Petersen, Hanne, Lise Kjaer, Anne, and Madsen, Mikael (eds.) (2008) Paradoxes of European
IntegrationAldershot: Ashgate.

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich and Harrison, James (2005) Reforming the World Trading System:

Phillips, Anne (2007) Multiculturalism without CulturePrinceton: Princeton University Press.

Pintore, Anna and Jori, Mario, (eds.) (1997) Law and Language: The Italian Analytical School.
Liverpool: Deborah Charles.

Pistor, Katarina and Wellons, Philip A. (1999) The Role of Law and Legal Institutions in Asian
Economic Development 1960–1995Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pocock, John G. A. (1968) Time, Institutions and Action: An Essay on Traditions and their
UnderstandingLondon: Methuen.

Pocock, John G. A. (1971) Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and
HistoryLondon: Methuen.

Podgorecki, Adamet al. (1973) Knowledge and Opinion About LawLondon: Martin Robertson.

Pogge, Thomas and Barry, Christian (eds.) (2005) Global Institutions and Responsibilities:
Achieving Global JusticeMalden, MA: Oxford: Blackwell.

Pogge, Thomas (1989) Realizing RawlsIthaca: Cornell University Press.

99
Pogge, Thomas (2001b) ‘Rawls and International Justice’ 51 Philosophical Qrtrly251.

Pogge, Thomas (2002) World Poverty and Human Rights (2nd edn 2008) Cambridge: Polity
Press.

Pogge, Thomas (2007a) John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice, translated by Kosch,
Michelle, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pogge, Thomas (ed.) (2001a) Global JusticeOxford: Blackwell.

Pogge, Thomas (ed.) (2007b) Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right:

Polanski, Przemyslaw P. (2007) Customary Law of the InternetThe Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press.

Pollock, Sir Frederick (1882) Essays in Jurisprudence and Ethics, London: Macmillan.

Posner, Richard (1996) Law and Legal Theory in England and America. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.

Posner, Richard A. (2007) Economic Analysis of Law (7th edn) Austin, Texas: Wolters Kluwer
for Aspen Publishers.

Postema, Gerald (1986) Bentham and the Common Law TraditionOxford: Clarendon Press.

Postema, Gerald (ed.) (2002) Bentham: Moral, Political and Legal PhilosophyAldershot: Ashgate.

Pound, Roscoe (1910) ‘Law in Books and Law in Action’ 44 American Law Review12.

Pound, Roscoe (1917) ‘The Limits of Effective Legal Action’ 3 American Bar Association
Journal56.

Postema, Roscoe (1959) Jurisprudence (5 vols.) St Paul, MN: West.

Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds.) (1991) The New Institutionalism in
Organisational AnalysisChicago: University of Chicago Press.

Power, Michael (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of VerificationOxford: Clarendon Press.

Pozen, Robert (1976) Legal Choices for State Enterprises in the Third WorldNew York: New
York University Press.

Pradhan, R. (ed.) (2003) Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law in Social, Economic, and Political
DevelopmentKathmandu: Commission on Folk Law and Legal Pluralism Press.

Quine, William van Orme (1951) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ 60 Philosophical Review20.

100
Quine, William van Orme (1953) From a Logical Point of ViewCambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.

Quine, William van Orme (1969) Ontological Relativity and Other EssaysNew York: Columbia
University Press.

Quinn, Michael (2008) ‘A Failure to Reconcile the Irreconcilable?

Radinowicz, Leon (1957) Sir James Fitzjames StephenLondon: Selden Society Lecture.

Rahman, Fazlur (2000) Revival and Reform in Islam: A Study of Islamic Fundamentalism
(Moosa, Ebrahim (ed.)) Boston, MA: One World.

Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2003) International Law from Below: Developing Social Movements
and Third World ResistanceCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ramadan, Tariq (2004) Western Muslims and the Future of IslamOxford: Oxford University
Press.

Ramasatry, Anita (2002) ‘What Local Lawyers Think: A Retrospective on the EBRD's Legal
Indicator

Ranney, Austin (1996) Courts and the Political Process. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Government
Studies.

Rawls, John (1955) ‘Two Concepts of Rules’, 64 Philosophical Review72.

Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of JusticeCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; Oxford:
Oxford University Press.

Rawls, John (1980) ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’ (reprinted in Collected Papers
Chapter 16).

Rawls, John (1985) ‘Justice as Fairness: Political, not Metaphysical’ (reprinted in Collected
Papers, Chapter 18).

John, Rawls (1987) ‘The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus’ (reprinted in Collected Papers,
Chapter 20).

Rawls, John (1993) Political LiberalismNew York: Columbia University Press.

Rawls, John (1995) ‘Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas’, 92 Jo of Philosophy132.

Rawls, John (1999a) ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ (1997) in Collected Papers Chapter
26.

101
Rawls, John (1999b) Collected Papers (ed.) Freeman, S., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.

Rawls, John (1999c) The Law of PeoplesCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Raz, Joseph (1970) The Concept of a Legal SystemOxford: Clarendon Press.

Raz, Joseph (1979b) The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and MoralityOxford: Clarendon Press.

Raz, Joseph (1994a) ‘Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence’ in Raz (1994b)
Chapter 4.

Raz, Joseph (1994b) Ethics in the Public DomainOxford: Oxford University Press.

Raz, Joseph (1998) ‘Multiculturalism’ 11 Ratio Juris193.

Raz, Joseph (1999) Engaging Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Raz, Joseph (2001) Value, Respect, and AttachmentCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reed, Chris (2004) Internet Law: Text and Materials (2nd edn) Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Reimann, Mathias (1996) ‘The End of Comparative Law as an Autonomous Discipline’, 11

Tulane Civil and European Law Forum49.

Reimann, Mathias (2002) ‘The Progress and Failure of Comparative Law’ 50 Am. Jo.
Comparative Law671.

Reimann, Mathias (ed.) (1993) The Reception of Continental Ideas in the Common Law
WorldBerlin: Duncker and Humblot.

Reimann, Mathias and Zimmerman, Reinhard (eds.) (2006) The Oxford Handbook of
Comparative LawOxford: Oxford University Press.

Reinicke, Wolfgang H., and Deng, Francis, (2000) Critical Choices: The United Nations,

Renteln, Alison Dundas (1990) Relativism and the Search for Human RightsLondon: Sage. (See
also 90 American Anthropologist 64 (1988).)

Renteln, Alison Dundas (2004) The Cultural DefenseNew York: Oxford University Press.

Resnick, Judith (2001) ‘Procedure: Legal Aspects’ 18 IESBS12140.

Rezsohazy, R. (2001) ‘Values, Sociology of ’ 24 IESBS116153.

102
Richards, Ivor A. (1943/67) How To Read a PageLondon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Riles, Annelise (2000) The Network Inside OutAnn Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Riles, Annelise (2002) ‘The Virtual Sociality of Rights: The Case of Women's Rights are Human
Rights’ in Likosky, (ed.).

Riles, Annelise (2004) ‘Anthropology, Human Rights and Legal Knowledge: Culture in the Iron
Cage’

Riles, Annelise (2006) Documents: Artifacts of Modern KnowledgeAnn Arbor: University of

Michigan Press.

Riles, Annelise (ed.) (2001) Rethinking the Masters of Comparative LawOxford: Hart.

Risse, Mathias (2005) ‘How Does the Global Order Harm the Poor?’ 33 Philosophy and Public
Affairs349.

Roberts, Simon (1979) Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal

AnthropologyHarmondsworth: Penguin.

Roberts, Simon (1998) ‘Against Legal Pluralism.

Roberts, Simon (2005) ‘After Government? On Representing Law Without the State’ 68 MLR1.

Roberts, Simon and Palmer, Michael (2005) Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of
Decision-Making (2nd edn) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Robinson, Mary (2007) A Voice for Human Rights (Boyle, Kevin (ed.)) Philadelphia: University
of Pennsylvania Press.

Robinson, Richard (1950) DefinitionOxford: Oxford University Press.

Rodley, Nigel (1999) The Treatment of Prisoners Under International Law (2nd edn) Oxford
University Press.

Roe, Mark J. (2006) ‘Legal Origins, Politics, and Modern Stock Markets’ 120 Harvard L. Rev.
460.

Rogers, Ben (1999) ‘John Rawls’ Prospect, June.

Rogers, Everett M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations (4th edn) (1st edn 1962) New York: The Free
Press.

Rorty, Richard (1987) ‘Science as Solidarity’ in Nelson, Megill, and McCloskey, (eds.).

103
Rorty, Richard (1989) Contingency, Irony, and SolidarityCambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Rorty, Richard (1991) Objectivity, Relativism and TruthCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rosen, Frederick (1983) Jeremy Bentham and Representative DemocracyOxford: Oxford

University Press.

Rosen, Frederick (1996) Introduction to BenthamIntroduction to the Principles of Morals and

LegislationOxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosen, Frederick (1997) ‘Utilitarianism and the Punishment of the Innocent: The Origins of a
False Doctrine’ 9 Utilitas23.

Rosen, Lawrence (1989) The Anthropology of Justice: Law as Culture in Islamic

SocietyCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rosen, Lawrence (2000) The Justice of IslamOxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosenstock-Huessy, Eugen (1938) Out of Revolution: Autobiography of Western ManNew York:

Morrow.

Roshier, Bob and Teff, Harvey (1980) Law and Society in EnglandLondon: Tavistock
Publications.

Ross, Hamish (2001) Law as a Social InstitutionOxford: Hart.

Rossi, Peter H. and Nock, Stephen (1982) Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey
ApproachBeverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Rossi, Peter H. and Berk, Richard A (1997) Just Punishments: Federal Guidelines and Public
Views ComparedNew York:

Rothman, David (1971) The Discovery of the AsylumBoston: Little, Brown.

Rowland, Stephen (2006) The Enquiring UniversityMaidenhead: Open University Press.

,Royal Anthropological Institute (1950) Notes and Queries in Anthropology (6th edn.), London.

Rubin, Paul H. (1994) ‘Growing a Legal System in the Post-Communist Economies’ 27 Cornell
Int. L. J. 1.

Rudé, G. (1959) The Crowd in the French RevolutionOxford: Clarendon Press.

Ryle, Johnet al., (1982) Warriors of the White Nile: The DinkaAmsterdam: Time-Life Books.

104
Sacco, Rudolfo (1991) ‘Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law II’, 39 Am.
Jo. Comparative Law343.

Sachleben, Mark (2006) Human Rights Treaties: Considering Patterns of Participation 1948–
2000New York: Routledge.

Sachs, Jeffrey (2005) The End of Poverty: How We Can Make It Happen In Our LifetimeLondon:
Penguin.

Said, Edward (1994) Orientalism (1st edn, 1978) New York: Vintage Books.

Salamon, Lester M. (ed.) (2002) The Tools of GovernmentOxford: Oxford University Press.

Sandel, Michael (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of JusticeCambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Sandel, Michael (ed.) (1984) Liberalism and its CriticsOxford: Blackwell.

Sands, Philippe (2005) Lawless World: America and the Making and Breaking of Global
RulesLondon: Allen Lane; Penguin.

Santos, Alvaro (2006) ‘The World Bank's Uses of “The Rule of Law” Promise in Economic

Santos, Boaventura and Rodriguez-Garavito, Cesar (2005) Law and Globalization from Below:
Towards a Cosmopolitan LegalityCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (1995) Toward a New Common SenseLondon: Routledge.

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (2002) Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalisation
and Emancipation (2nd edn) London: Butterworth.

Sarat, Austin and Felstiner, William (1995) Divorce Lawyers and Their ClientsNew York: Oxford
University Press.

Sarat, Austin and Silbey, Susan (1988) ‘The Pull of the Policy Audience’ 10 Law and Policy97.

Sarkar, A. K. (1973) (ed.) Summary of Salmond's Jurisprudence (3rd edn 1981) Bombay:
Tripathi.

Sarkar, Subodh C. (1913, 1971) Sarkar on Evidence (1st edn 1913; 12th edn 1971 (eds.) , P. C.
and Sarkar, S.) Calcutta: Sarkar and Sons.

Sartorius, Rolf (1969) ‘Utilitarianism and Obligation’ 66 Jo. Philosophy67.

Sauter, Wolf and Vos, Ellen (1998) ‘Harmonisation under Community Law:

105
Scanlon, Thomas M. (1998) What We Owe Each OtherCambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard
University.

Schacht, Joseph (1964) Introduction to Islamic LawOxford: Oxford University Press.

Schama, Simon (2005) Rough CrossingsLondon: BBC Books.

Schauer, Frederick (1991) Playing by the Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schauer, Frederick (2006) ‘(Re)Taking Hart’ 119 Harvard L. Rev. 852 (Review of Lacey (2004)).

Schlemmer-Schulte, Sabine and Tung, Ko-Yung (2001) Liber amicorum Ibrahim F. I. Shihata:
International Finance and Development LawThe Hague: Kluwer Law International.

Schlesinger, Rudolph B. (ed.) (1968) Formation of Contracts – A Study of the Common Core of
Legal Systems. 2 vols. Dobbs Ferry, New York: Oceana.

Schlesinger, Rudolph B.et al. (1998) Comparative Law: Cases, Text, Materials (6th edn) New
York:

Schofield, Philip (2006) Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy
BenthamOxford:

Schum, David (1994/2001) Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic ReasoningNew York: Wylie;

reprinted (2001) Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Scott, Colin (2004) ‘Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the Post-regulatory State’
in Jordana, and Levi-Faur, (eds.).

Scott, W. Richard (1995) Institutions and OrganizationsThousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.

Scott, W. Richard (2001) ‘Organization: Overview’ 16 IESBS10910.

Scott, W. Richard (1998) (4th edn) Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open SystemsUpper

Sedley, Sir Stephen (2005) ‘Are Human Rights Universal and Does it Matter?’ Holdsworth
Lecture,

Seidman, Robert (1965) ‘The Inarticulate Premiss’ 3 Jo. Modern African Studies567.

Seidman, Robert (1978) The State, Law and DevelopmentLondon: Croom Helm.

Seidman, Ann and Seidman, Robert (1994) State and Law in the Development ProcessNew York:

Selznick, Philip (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal
OrganizationsBerkeley, CA:
106
Sen, Amartya and Drèze, Jean (1999) The Amartya Sen and Jean Drèze OmnibusNew Delhi:
Oxford University Press.

Sen, Amartya (1981) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation Oxford:
Clarendon Press.

Sen, Amartya (1997) ‘Human Rights and Asian Values: What Lee Kuan Yew and Li Peng

Sen, Amartya (1999) Development as FreedomOxford: Oxford University Press.

Sen, Amartya (2004), ‘Elements of a Theory of Human Rights’ 32 Philosophy and Public
Affairs315.

Senghaas, Dieter (2007) On Perpetual Peace: A Timely AssessmentNew York: Berghan Books.

Shah, Prakash and Menski, Werner (eds.) (2006) Migration, Diasporas and Legal Systems in
EuropeLondon: Routledge Cavendish.

Shapiro, Martin (1981) Courts: A Comparative and Political AnalysisChicago: University of

Chicago Press.

Sherr, Avrom, Paterson, Alan and Moorehead, Richard (1994) The Quality Agenda Volume One:

Sherr, Avrom, Webley, Lisa, Rogers, S., Paterson, Alan and Domberger, Simon (2000) Quality
and Cost: Final Report on the Contracting of Civil, Non-Family Advice and AssistancePilot
Norwich: Stationery Office.

Shihata, Ibrahim F. (1991) The World Bank in a Changing WorldDordrecht: Nijhoff.

Shils, Edward (1981) TraditionChicago: University of Chicago Press.

Shivji, Issa (1989) The Concept of Human Rights in AfricaLondon: Codesria.

Shivji, Issa (1998) Not Yet Democracy: Reforming Land Tenure in TanzaniaLondon:
International Institute for Environment and Development.

Shivji, Issa (ed.) (1986) The Limits of Legal RadicalismDar-es-Salaam: Faculty of Law.

Short, J. F. (2001) ‘Crime: Sociological Aspects’ 5 IESBS2934.

Shue, Henry (1980) Basic RightsPrinceton: Princeton University Press.

Shute, Stephen and Hurley, Susan (eds.) (1993) On Human Rights (The Oxford Amnesty
Lectures)

107
Siddiqi, Muhammad Nejatullah (1997) Banking Without InterestLeicester: The Islamic
Foundation.

Sidgwick, Henry (1907) The Methods of EthicsLondon: MacMillan.

Siedentop, Larry (2000) Democracy in EuropeLondon: Penguin.

Siems, M. M. (2005) ‘What Does Not Work in Comparing Securities Laws: A Critique of La
Porta et al.'s Methodology’ 16 International Company and Commercial Law Rev. 300.

Silbey, Susan and Sarat, Austin (1987) ‘Critical Traditions in Law and Society Research’ 21

Simmonds, Nigel (1986, 1st edn) Central Issues in Law and Jurisprudence: Justice, Law and
RightsLondon:

Simmons, Paul A. (1992) ‘Government by Unaccountable Private Non-Profit Corporation’ 10 Jo.

of Human Rights67.

Simpson, A. W. Brian (2001) Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of
the European ConventionOxford: Oxford University Press.

Simpson, A. W. Brian (ed.) (1984) Biographical Dictionary of the Common LawLondon:

Butterworth.

Singer, Peter (1972) ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’ in 1 Philosophy and Public Affairs229.

Singer, Peter (1975/1990/1) Animal LiberationNew York: Random House.

Singer, Peter (1977) ‘Reconsidering the Famine Relief Argument’ in Brown, and Shue, (eds.)

Singer, Peter (1979/1993) Practical EthicsCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Singer, Peter (1980) MarxOxford: Oxford University Press.

Singer, Peter (1983) The Expanding Circle: Ethics and SociobiologyOxford: Oxford University
Press.

Singer, Peter (2002/2004) One World: The Ethics of Globalization (2nd edn), New Haven: Yale
University Press.

Singer, Peter (ed.) (1991) A Companion to EthicsOxford: Blackwell.

Slaughter, Anne-Marie (1994) ‘A Typology of Transjudicial Communication’ 29 U. Richmond

Law Rev. 99.

Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2004) A New World OrderPrinceton: Princeton University Press.

108
Smart, J. J. C. (1967) ‘Utilitarianism’ 7 Encyclopedia of PhilosophyEdwards, P. (ed.).

Smelser, Neil and Baltes, Paul (eds.) (2001) International Encyclopedia of the Social and
Behavioral SciencesNew York:

Smigel, Erwin O. (1964) The Wall Street Lawyer, Professional Organization Man?New York:
Free Press.

Smith, Adam (1776) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of NationsDublin:
Whitestone.

Smits, Jan M. (2007) ‘Convergence of Private law in Europe: Towards a new ius commune?’

Snyder, Francis G. (1980) ‘Law and Development in the Light of Dependency Theory’ 14 Law
and Society Rev. 723.

Snyder, Francis G. (1993) ‘The Effectiveness of European Community Law: Institutions,

Processes, Tools

Soros, George (2002) George Soros on GlobalizationNew York: Public Affairs.

Soueif, Ahdaf (1999) The Map of LoveLondon: Bloomsbury.

Stade, R. (2001) ‘Diffusion: Anthropological Aspects’ 6 IESBS3673.

Starr, June and Collier, Jane (1989) History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in
Legal AnthropologyIthaca: Cornell University Press.

Stein, Peter (1980) Legal Evolution: The Story of an IdeaCambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Stein, Peter (1984) ‘Maine, Sir Henry James Sumner’ in Simpson, (ed.) at p. 341.

Stein, Peter (1988) The Character and Influence of the Roman Civil Law: Historical
EssaysLondon: Hambledon Press.

Steiner, Henry and Alston, Philip (eds.) (1996) International Human Rights in Context: Law,
Politics, Morals (3rd edn 2008 with Ryan Goodman) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stephen, J. Fitzjames (1883) A Digest of the Law of Evidence (12th edn 1948) London:
Macmillan.

Stern, Vivien (1998) A Sin Against the Future: Imprisonment in the WorldHarmondsworth:
Penguin.

109
Stevens, Robert B (1983) Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the
1980sChapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Stewart, Ann (2007) ‘Who Do We Care About? Reflections on Gender Justice in the Global
Market’ 58 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly359.

Stewart, Ann (forthcoming 2009) Gender, Law and Justice in a Global MarketCambridge:

Steyn, Johan (2004) ‘Guantanamo Bay: The Legal Black Hole’ 53 Int. and Comp. L. Qtrly1.

Stone, Christopher (1996) Should Trees have Standing?: And Other Essays on Law, Morals and
the EnvironmentDobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana.

Stone, Julius (1950) The Province and Function of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.

Stone, Julius (1959) ‘The Ratio of the Ratio Decidendi’ 22 MLR597.

Stone, Julius (1966) Law and the Social Sciences in the Second Half CenturyMinneapolis: U.
Minnesota Press.

Stone, Julius (1966) Social Dimensions of Law and JusticeLondon: Stevens.

Stone, Julius (1967) ‘Trends in Jurisprudence in the Second Half Century’ printed in Hathaway
(1980).

Stotzky, Irwin P. (1993) Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the
JudiciaryBoulder: Westview Press.

Strang, David and Soule, Sarah A. (1998) ‘Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements:
From Hybrid Corns to Poison Pills’, 24 Annual Review of Sociology265.

Suchman, M. C. (2001) ‘Organizations and the Law’ 16 IESBS10948.

Sugarman, David (2005) ‘Hart Interviewed: H. L. A. Hart in Conversation with David Sugarman’
32 Jo. of Law and Society267.

Summers, Robert S. (1971) ‘The Technique Element in Law’ 59 California L. Rev. 733.

Summers, Robert S. (1993) ‘A Formal Theory of the Rule of Law’ 6 Ratio Juris127.

Summers, Robert S. (1999) ‘Propter Honoris Respectum: The Principles of the Rule of Law’ 74
Notre Dame L. Rev. 1691.

Sumner, William Graham (1906) FolkwaysNew York: Ginn.

110
Supiot, Alain (ed.) (2001) Beyond Employment: Changes in Work and the Future of Labour Law
in Europe (The Supiot Report) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sutton, Francis X (ed.) (1990) A World to Make: Development in PerspectiveNew Brunswick,

NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Symposium (1956) on The Reception of Foreign Law in Turkey, Annales de la Faculté de Droit
d'Istanbul No.6; Symposium in 9 Int. Social Science Bulletin.

Symposium (1992) ‘Do Lawyers Impair Economic Growth?’ 17 Law and Social Inquiry No.4

Symposium (1995) ‘Donald Black and the Sociology of Law’ 20 Law and Social Inquiry777–870.

Symposium (2006) ‘Empirical Studies of the Legal Profession: What Do We Know about
Lawyers’ Lives?' 84 N. Carolina L. Rev No. 5 1415.

Symposium (2007) ‘Globalization of the Legal Profession’ 14 Indiana Jo. Global Legal Studies1.

Szabo, D. (2001) ‘Criminal Justice, Sociology of’ 5 IESBS2954.

Tabandeh, Sultanhussein (1970) A Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human

RightsLondon: Goulding.

Taha, Mahmoud Mohamed (1987) The Second Message of Islam (trs. and ed. An Na'im,
Abdullahi). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

Tamanaha, Brian (1993) Understanding Law in Micronesia: An Interpretive Approach to

Transplanted LawOxford: Oxford University Press.

Tamanaha, Brian (1995) ‘The Lessons of Law-and-Development Studies’, 89 Am. Jo. Int. L. 470.
(Review Article).

Tamanaha, Brian (1997) Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and a Social Theory of
LawOxford: Oxford University Press.

Tamanaha, Brian (2001) A General Jurisprudence of Law and SocietyOxford: Oxford University
Press.

Tamanaha, Brian (2004) On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, TheoryNew York: Cambridge
University Press.

Tamanaha, Brian (2006) Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of LawNew York:
Cambridge University Press.

111
Tamanaha, Brian (2007) ‘Enhancing Prospects for General Jurisprudence’ 15 University of Miami
International and Comparative Law Rev69.

Tanenbaum, Sandra J. (2006) ‘Evidence by Any Other Name: Commentary on Tonnelli (2006)’
12 Jo. Of Evaluation of Clinical Practice273.

Tarde, Gabriel (1979) Les lois de l'imitation (lst edn 1890) Paris: Slatkine Reprints.

Tasioulas, John (2002a) ‘Human Rights, Universality and the Values of Personhood: Retracing
Griffin's Steps’ 10 European Jo. of Philosophy79.

Tasioulas, John (2002b) ‘From Utopia to Kazanistan: John Rawls and the Law of Peoples’ 22
Oxford Jo. Legal Studies367.

Tasioulas, John (2002c) ‘International Law and the Limits of Fairness’ 13 European Jo. of
International Law993.

Tasioulas, John (2005) ‘Global Justice without End’ 36 Metaphilosophy3.

Tasioulas, John (2006) ‘Punishment and Repentance’ 81 Philosophy279.

Tasioulas, John (2007a) ‘The Moral Reality of Human Rights’ in Pogge, (ed.) at p. 75.

Tasioulas, John (2007b) ‘Customary International Law and the Quest for Justice’ in Perreau-
Saussine, and Murphy, (eds.) at p. 307.

Tasioulas, John (2008) ‘The Legitimacy of International Law’ in Besson, and Tasioulas, (eds.)
Chapter 3.

Taylor, Charles (1995) Philosophical ArgumentsCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Taylor, Charles (1999) ‘Conditions of an Unenforced Consensus on Human Rights’ in Bauer, and
Bell, (eds.).

Taylor, Charles (2007) A Secular AgeCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Taylor, Veronica (2007) ‘Law Reform Olympics: Measuring the Effects of Law Reform in
Transitional Economies’ in Lindsey, (ed.) Chapter 4.

Teitel, Ruti (2000) Transitional JusticeOxford: Oxford University Press.

Terry, Laurel S. (2007) ‘The Bologna Process and its Implications for U.S. Legal Education’ 57
Jo. Legal Education237.

Téson, Fernando R. (1998) A Philosophy of International LawBoulder: Westview Press.

112
Téson, Fernando (1999) ‘The Rawlsian Theory of International Law’ 9 Ethics and International
Affairs79.

Teubner, Gunther (1992) ‘The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism’ 13 Cardozo Law
Rev. 1443.

Teubner, Gunther (ed.) (1997a) ‘Global Bukowina’: Legal Pluralism in World Society' in Teubner
(1997b).

Teubner, Gunther (ed.) (1997b) Global Law Without a StateAldershot: Dartmouth.

Thatcher, Margaret (1993) The Downing Street YearsLondon: HarperCollins.

Thomas, Philip (ed.) (1996) Legal FrontiersAldershot, Hants; Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.

Thomas, Philip (ed.) (1997) Socio-Legal StudiesAldershot: Dartmouth.

Thompson, Edward P. (1963) The Making of the English Working ClassLondon: Victor Gollancz.

Thompson, Edward P. (1975) Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black ActLondon: Allen
Lane.

Tibi, Bassam (1993) ‘Islamic Law/Shar'ia and Human Rights: International Law and Relations’ in
Lindholm, and Vogt, (eds.) Chapter 5.

Tonelli, Mark R. (2006) ‘Integrating Evidence into Clinical Practice: An Alternative to Evidence-
based Approaches’ 12 Jo. of Evaluation of Clinical Practice248.

Toynbee, Arnold Joseph (1947) The Study of HistoryOxford: Oxford University Press.

Transparency International (2007) Global Corruption Report: Corruption in Judicial

SystemsCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Trubek, David and Galanter, Marc (1974) ‘Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Reflections on the
Crisis of Law and Development Studies in the United States’ 1974 Wisconsin L. Rev.1062.

Trubek, David and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) (2006) The New Law and Economic DevelopmentNew
York:

Tsagourias, Nicholas (ed.) (2007) Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European

ModelsCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tufte, Edward R (1983) The Visual Display of Quantititative InformationCheshire Conn.: The
Graphics Press.

113
Tufte, Edward R (1990) Envisioning InformationCheshire, Conn: The Graphics Press.

Tufte, Edward R (1997) Visual ExplanationsCheshire, Conn: The Graphics Press.

Tur, Richard and Twining, William (eds.) (1986) Essays on KelsenOxford: Oxford University
Press.

Twining, William (1957) ‘Some Aspects of Reception’, Sudan Law Jo. and Reports229.

Twining, William (1963) ‘The Restatement of African Customary Law: A Comment’ 1 Jo.
Modern African Studies221.

Twining, William (1964) The Place of Customary Law in the National Legal Systems of East
AfricaChicago:

Twining, William (1968) The Karl Llewellyn PapersChicago: University of Chicago Law School.

Twining, William (1973) Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement. London: Weidenfeld and
Nicolson

Twining, William (1974a) ‘Law and Social Science: The Method of Detail’, New Society, 27
June.

Twining, William (1975) ‘The Contemporary Significance of Bentham's Anarchical Fallacies’ 61

Twining, William (1976) Academic Law and Legal DevelopmentLagos: Faculty of Law,
University of Lagos (Taylor Lectures, 1975).

Twining, William (1979), ‘Academic Law and Legal Philosophy: The Significance of Herbert
Hart’ 95 Law Quarterly Rev. 557 (reprinted in GJB Chapter 4).

Twining, William (ed.) (1986) Legal Theory and Common LawOxford: Blackwell (LTCL).

Twining, William (1993a) ‘Karl Llewellyn's Unfinished Agenda: Law and Society

Twining, William (1993b) ‘Constitutions, Constitutionalism and Constitution-making’ in Stotzky,

(ed.) Chapter 25.

Twining, William (1994) Blackstone's Tower: The English Law SchoolLondon:

Twining, William (1996), ‘Rethinking Law Schools’, 21 Law and Social Inquiry1007.

Twining, William (1997a) ‘Other People's Power: The Bad Man and English Positivism 1897–
1997’ 63 Brooklyn L. Rev. 189. (reprinted in GLT, Chapter 5).

114
Twining, William (1997b) Law in Context: Enlarging a Discipline. Oxford: Oxford University
Press (LIC).

Twining, William (1998) ‘Thinking about Law Schools: Rutland Reviewed’ 25 Jo. Law and
Society1.

Twining, William (2000a) ‘Comparative Law and Legal Theory: The Country and Western
tradition.

Twining, William (2000b) Globalisation and Legal TheoryLondon: Butterworth and Evanston:

Twining, William (2002a) ‘Cosmopolitan Legal Studies’, 9 Int. Jo. Legal Profession1.

Twining, William (2002b) ‘Reviving General Jurisprudence’. in Likosky, M. (ed.) Ch. 3

(reprinted

Twining, William (2002c) The Great Juristic Bazaar: Jurists' Texts and Lawyers'
StoriesAldershot:

Twining, William (2002d) ‘Talk About Realism’ in The Great Juristic Bazaar Chapter 5.

Twining, William (2003b) ‘The Province of Jurisprudence Re-examined’ (Julius Stone Lecture) in
Dauvergne, (ed.) Chapter 2.

Twining, William (2003c) ‘The Role of Academics in the Legal System’ in Cane, and Tushnet,
(eds.) 920.

Twining, William (2005a) ‘Diffusion of Law: A Global Perspective’ 49 Jo. Legal Pluralism1.

Twining, William (2005b) ‘Have Concepts, Will Travel’ 1 Int. Jo. Law in Context5.

Twining, William (2005c) ‘Human Rights: Southern Voices’ 11 Review of Constitutional

Studies203.

Twining, William (2005d) ‘Social Science and Diffusion of Law’ 32 Jo. Law and Society, 203.

Twining, William (2006a) ‘Diffusion and Globalization Discourse’ 47 Harvard International Law
Jo. 507.

Twining, William (2006b) ‘Glenn on Tradition. An Overview’ 1 Jo. Comparative Law107.

Twining, William (2006c) Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays (2nd edn) (1st edn 1990)

Twining, William (2006d) ‘Schauer on Hart’ 119 Harvard L Rev Forum122.

Twining, William (2007a) ‘Globalisation and Comparative Law’ in Őrűcű, and Nelken, (eds.)
115
Twining, William (2007b) ‘Law and Development: Sketches for a Memoir’ (unpublished).

Twining, William (2007c) ‘The Challenge of Authority – a Post-Modern Foundationalist?’ Public

Twining, William (2007d) ‘General Jurisprudence’ 15 University of Miami International and

Twining, William (2008a) ‘The Law in Context Movement’ in Cane, and Conaghan, (eds.).

Twining, William and Miers, David (1999) How to Do Things With RulesLondon: Butterworth,
(4th edn) (HTDTWR).

Twining, William and Emma V, Quick (eds.) (1994) Legal Records in the
CommonwealthAldershot: Ashgate.

Twining, William and Hampsher-Monk, Iain (eds.) (2003) Evidence and Inference in History and
Law: Interdisciplinary DialoguesEvanston: Northwestern University Press.

Twining, William and Twining, Penelope (1973) ‘Bentham on Torture’ in James, (ed.).

Ul Haq, Mahbub (1995) Reflections on Human DevelopmentNew York: Oxford University Press.

Ullmann-Margalit, Edna (1977) The Emergence of NormsOxford: Oxford University Press.

,UNCS (Habitat) (1997a) The Istanbul Declaration and the Habitat AgendaNew York: Habitat.

,UNCS (Habitat) (1997b) The Challenge of Sustainable CitiesNew York: Habitat.

Unger, Roberto M. (1996) What Should Legal Analysis Become?New York: Verso.

,United Nations Development Programme (2003b) Indicators for Monitoring the Millennium
Development Goals New York:

,United Nations Development Programme (2005) A Time for Bold Ambition: Together We Can

www.undp.org/mdg/countryreports2.shtml

,United Nations (2000) Millennium Declaration

http://un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf.

,United States Institute of Peace (2005) Sudan Peace Agreementswww.usip.org/library/pa/-

sudan.html/.

Upham, Frank (1987) Law and Social Change in Postwar JapanCambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.

116
Ven, A. H. (1986) ‘Central problems in the management of innovation’ 32 Management
Science590.

Walle, Nicholas (2001) African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis 1979–
99Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doren, John (1988) ‘Death African Style: The Case of S. M. Otieno’ 36 American Jo.
Comparative Law329.

Hoecke, Mark (1986) What is Legal Theory?Leuven: Acco.

Hoecke, Mark (2002) Law as CommunicationOxford: Hart.

Vico, Giambattista (1744/2002) The First New Science (ed. and trs. Pompa, Leon) New York:
Cambridge University Press.

Vinogradoff, Sir Paul (1920–22), Outlines of Historical Jurisprudence 2 vols London: Oxford
University Press.

Vizard, Polly (2006) Poverty and Human Rights: Sen's ‘Capability Perspective’ ExploredOxford:
Oxford University Press.

Voll, John (1990) Preface to An Na'im Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human
Rights and International LawSyracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

Waldron, Jeremy (1987) Nonsense Upon Stilts: Bentham, Burke, and Marx on the Rights of
ManLondon: Methuen.

Waldron, Jeremy (1994) ‘Vagueness in Law and Language: Some Philosophical Issues’ 82
California L. Rev. 509.

Waldron, Jeremy (1999) The Dignity of LegislationCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Waldron, Jeremy (2001) Law and DisagreementOxford: Oxford University Press.

Walker, Clive (2002) Blackstone's Guide to the Anti-terrorism Legislation. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.

Walker, Neil (2005) ‘Legal Theory and the European Union: A 25th Anniversary Essay’ 25
Oxford Jo. Legal Studies581.

Walker, Neil (ed.) (2003) Sovereignty in TransitionOxford: Hart.

Wallerstein, Immanuel (1979) The Capitalist World EconomyNew York: Cambridge University
Press.

117
Wallerstein, Immanuel (1980) ‘The Withering Away of States’ 8 International Journal of
Sociology of Law369.

Wallerstein, Immanuel (1984) The Politics of the World-Economy: The States, Movements, and
Civilizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wallerstein, Immanuel (1991) Unthinking Social ScienceCambridge: Polity Press.

Wallerstein, Immanuel (2002) ‘Legal Restraints in the Capitalist Economy’ in Likosky, (ed.).

Walton, Douglas (1989) Informal Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walzer, Michael (1983) Spheres of JusticeNew York: Basic Books.

Walzer, Michael (1985) ‘The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics’ in Beitz, et
al. (1985) 217.

Ward, Barbara (1966) Spaceship EarthNew York: Columbia University Press.

Ward, Ian (2003a) Justice, Humanity, and the New World OrderAldershot: Ashgate.

Ward, Ian (2003b) A Critical Introduction to European Law (2nd edn) London: Butterworth.

Watson, Alan (1974) Legal Transplants (revised edn. 1993) Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

Watson, Alan (1976) ‘Legal Transplants and Law Reform’ 92 Law Qtrly Rev. 79.

Watson, Alan (2000a) Legal Transplants and European Private Law Ius Commune Lecture,
Maastricht.

Watson, Alan (2000b) Law Out of ContextAthens: U. Georgia Press.

Watson, Alan (2007) Comparative Law: Law, Reality and SocietyLake Mary, FL: Vandeplas
Publications.

Wattles, Jeffrey (1996) The Golden RuleNew York: Oxford University Press.

Webber, Jeremy (1995) ‘Relations of Force and Relations of Justice: The Emergence of
Normative Community Between Colonists and Aboriginal Peoples’, 33 Osgoode Hall L. Jo. 624.

Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1999) The Constitution of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Wei-Ming, Tu (1985) Confucian Thought: Self-hood as Creative TransformationAlbany: State

University of New York Press.

118
Weldon, T. D. (1953) The Vocabulary of Politics. Harmonsworth: Penguin.

Westbrook, David A. (2006) ‘Theorizing the Diffusion of Law: Conceptual Difficulties’ 47 Harv.
International Law Jo. 489.

Westbrook, J. L. (1999) ‘The Globalisation of Currency Reform’, New Zealand Law Review401.

Weston, Burns and Marks, Stephen P. (eds.) (1999) The Future of International Human
RightsArdsley, NY: Transnational.

Weyrauch, Walter (1964) The Personality of LawyersNew Haven: Yale University Press.

Weyrauch, Walter and Bell, Maureen A. (1993) ‘Autonomous Lawmaking: The Case of the
Gypsies’ 103 Yale Law Jo. 323.

Weyrauch, Walteret al. (ed.) (1997) Symposium on Gypsy Law (Romaniya) 45 American Jo
Comparative Law2.

Whitaker, Ben (ed.) (1973) The Fourth World: Victims of Group OppressionNew York: Schocken
Books.

Whitman, James Q. (1999) Review of Wieacker (1995) 17 Law and History Review400.

Whitman, James Q. (2003) ‘The Neo-Romantic Turn’ in Legrand, and Munday, (eds.) at p. 312.

Whitman, James Q. (2005) ‘The Comparative Study of Criminal Punishment’ 1 Annual Review
of Law and Social Science17.

Widner, Jennifer A. (2001) Building the Rule of Law: Francis Nyalali and the Road to Judicial
Independence in AfricaNew York: Norton.

Wieacker, Franz (1981) ‘The Importance of Roman Law for Modern Western Civilization and
Western Legal Thought’, IV Boston College International and Comparative Law Review257.

Wieacker, Franz (1990) ‘Foundations of European Legal Culture’ 38 American. Jo. Comparative
Law1.

Wiggins, David (2006) Ethics: Twelve Lectures on the Philosophy of MoralityCambridge, MA:
Cambridge University Press.

Wigmore, J. H. (1928) A Panorama of the World's Legal Systems (3 vols.) St. Paul, MN: West.

Williamson, John (1994a) The Political Economy of Policy ReformWashington DC: Institute for
International Economics.

119
Williamson, John (1994b) ‘In Search of a Manual for Technopols’ in Williamson, J. (ed.) Chapter
2.

Wilson, Geoffrey (ed.) (1995) Frontiers of Legal ResearchChichester: Chancery Lane Publishing.

Wilson, Richard (ed.) (1997) Human Rights, Culture and ContextLondon: Pluto Press.

Wing, Adrien K. (ed.) (2000) Global Critical Race Feminism: An International ReaderNew York:
New York University Press.

Wise, Edward M. (1990) ‘The Transplant of Legal Patterns’, 38 Am. Jo. Comp. L.1.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (Ogden, C. K., trs.1990) London:

Routledge.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953) Philosophical Investigations (Anscombe, G. E. M. trs.) Oxford:

Basil Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1969) (2nd edn) Preliminary studies for the ‘Philosophical Investigations’
generally known as The Blue and Brown BooksOxford: Blackwell.

Wolfe, Tom (1988) The Bonfire of the VanitiesNew York: Bantam Books.

Wollheim, Richard (1954) ‘The Nature of Law’ 2 Political Studies128.

Wood, Philip (2005) Maps of World Financial Law (5th edn) London: Allen and Overy.

Woodman, Gordon (2003) ‘Why There Can be No Map of Law’ in Pradhan, (ed.).

Woodman, Gordon (2006) ‘The Cthonic Legal Tradition – on Glenn's Legal Traditions of the
World’ 1 Jo. Comparative Law123.

Woodman, Gordon R, Wanitzek, Ulrike, Sippel, Harald (eds.) (2004) Local Land Law and
Globalization: A Comparative Study of Peri-urban Areas in Benin, Ghana, and TanzaniaMunster:
Lit Verlag.

Woodruffe, John G. and Ali, Ameer (1979–81) The Law of Evidence (14th edn.) Allahabad: Law

Woodward, Peter (1990) Sudan 1898–1989: The Unstable StateBoulder: Lynne Rienner.

,World Bank (2007) Governance Matters VI: Governance Indicators for 1996–2006New York.

Wrase, Michael (2006) ‘Rechtsoziologie und Law and Society – die deutsche Rechtssoziologie
zweschen Krise und Neuaufbruch’ 27 Zetschrift fur Rechtssoziologie289.

120
Wrong, Dennis H. (1994) The Problem of Order: What Unites and Divides SocietyNew York:
The Free Press.

Yilmaz, Ihsan (2005) Muslim Laws, Politics and Society in Modern Nation StatesAldershot:
Ashgate.

Zakaria, Fareed (1994) ‘Culture is Destiny: A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew’ 73 Foreign
Affairs2.

Zander, Michael (1973) Cases and Materials on the English Legal SystemLondon: Weidenfeld &
Nicolson; (10th edn 2007 Cambridge University Press).

Zedner, Lucy (2003) ‘The Concept of Security: An Agenda for Comparative Analysis’ 23 Legal
Studies153.

Zedner, Lucia (2007a) ‘Preventive Justice or Pre-Punishment? The case of Control Orders’ 60
Current Legal Problems174.

Zedner, Lucia (2007b) ‘Seeking Security in Eroding Rights: The Side-Stepping of Due Process’ in
Goold, and Lazarus, (eds.).

Zeigert, Klaus A. (2002) ‘The Thick Description of Law’ in Banakar, and Travers, (eds.).

Ziemele, Ineta (ed.) (2004) Reservations to Human Rights Treaties and the Vienna Convention
Regime: Conflict, Harmony or ReconciliationLeiden: Boston: M. Nijhoff.

Zweigert, Konrad and Kötz, Hein (1971) An Introduction to Comparative Law (First edition in
German, Vol. I, 2nd edn 1987, 3rd edn. trans. Weir, Tony 1998) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zweigert, Konrad and Kötz, Hein (1998) (3rd edn) An Introduction to Comparative Law trans.
Weir, Tony, Oxford: OUP.

121