Title: Reimagining History: The Politics of Representation in Nangeli's Tale

Author(s): V. K. Karthika

Source: Economic and Political Weekly (Engage), Vol. 59, Issue No. 2, 13 Jan, 2024.

ISSN (Online): 2349-8846

Published by: Economic and Political Weekly (Engage)

Article URL: /engage/article/reimagining-history-politics-representation-0

Author(s) Affiliation: V. K. Karthika (karthika.leedsuniversity@gmail.com) teaches at the

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology-Trichy.

Articles published in EPW Engage are web exclusive.

1 , Vol.59, Issue No.2

Reimagining History: The Politics of
Representation in Nangeli's Tale
V. K. Karthika

Caste Representations: Prejudices and Preoccupations

In a period when history and the historicity are being restructured and redefined, it is interesting
to revisit the manifesto of a group of Puerto Rican historians in the 1970s, which is cited in
Bhattacharya (1983: 3):

We face the problem that the history presented as ours is only part of our history.... What of the
history of the ‘historyless’, the anonymous people who in their collective acts, their work, daily
lives and fellowship, have forged our society through the centuries?

Whose history is being written and the agency and authenticity of that history always have been
problematic. “People’s history” or “history from below” focussed on the experiences and
perspectives of the marginalised. The renaissance spirit of reinventing and rereading the cultural

2 , Vol.59, Issue No.2

texts enabled the humanity to look at issues of the people at the social periphery through a lens
of criticality and to percolate the unrecorded struggles, anxieties, and aspirations of the
marginalised. As Bhattacharya (1983: 15) argues “History of ‘the people,’ or the history of ‘the
oppressed,’ or ‘history from below’-by whatever name one calls it promises to offer a new
perspective on our past.” Art being a representation of life always reflected and accommodated
the historical, cultural, and social changes of its period of production. Myths and legends are
always marked in the cultural memory of a people, and they parade back from the past to the
present occasionally through the means of several artistic means or devices.

Visual arts like films and graphic arts like paintings and comics are also sites of such legends,
myths, and chronicled or unaccounted history being retold. In the present era, in which logical
debates on violation of human rights persevere, caste and caste-based violence in the
contemporary society marshal certain vignettes from the history into the modern minds that
engage in the discourse. Various art forms also become engrossed in this caste debate and a
critical discourse analysis of them unveils the hidden agendas of certain representations. Most of
such discourses are camouflaged as a revolt against caste discrimination, but they carry within
them the undertones of the very casteist sentiments that they allegedly challenge or protest
against. When such subtle references manifest in language, one needs a critical mindset to
problematise them and to identify the subtilities involved in such “mis”- representations. However,
when the references are trafficked into the minds of the consumers without them realising the
biased and prejudiced position that they are endowed with through the careful weaving of the
narrative, be it literature, visual arts, graphic arts, or digital arts, it takes considerable effort to
decode these naturalised and acculturated elements and critique them. In short, appearance
becomes deceptive and to comprehend the inherent layers of meaning of such cultural texts one
has to chisel one’s own sensibilities and sensitivity towards critical questions like caste and
gender.

A recent example of a visual narrative subverting the question of caste-based violence when it
was an apparent documentation of the historical violations and massacre of human rights that
happened in the 19th-century Kerala was the Malayalam film Pathonpatham Noottand (The 19th

3 , Vol.59, Issue No.2

Century) directed by Vinayan. While the movie had managed to portray the divided Kerala
society and the Savarna cruelty being enforced upon the lower caste, focussing more on the
Ezhava community, the film’s portrayal of the legend of Nangeli becomes a concern. The story
of Nangeli, a popular legend in Kerala especially the southern part of Kerala, does not feature in
any of the historical documents including the Mathilakam Records, which documented all the
administrative action plans and rules of the erstwhile state of Travancore. Before going into the
visual narrative’s lacunae in the depiction of the legend and the caste struggle that it accentuates,
it is important to sketch the legend itself.

The Legend of Nangeli

Nangeli was a lower caste (Ezhava) woman from Cherthala, a place in Travancore, in the
southern part of Kerala, who chopped off her breasts in protest against the caste system that
demanded “breast tax” from the lower caste women. As the land tax was low in Travancore, the
rulers had imposed many inhuman taxes on the lower caste to lush their treasuries and thus
there were Thalakkaram (general tax), Valakkaram (tax on the fishing net), Meesakkaram (tax on
the moustache), and Mulakkaram or “breast tax” (tax on breasts of women) was one among
them. The upper caste men, the tax collectors, in fact used to keep surveillance of the breasts of
a girl as she grows up (Pillai 2017) and by measuring the size and dimensions the tax amount
was determined. Women of lower caste were not allowed to clothe their breasts during those
days and having the torso uncovered did not induce shame (Iqbal 2017). However, towards of
the end of the 18th century, women of upper castes were allowed to use upper clothes, a shawl,
and this became more or less the symbol of their caste privilege (Pillai 2017). Dalit women had
to pay the “breast tax” when they achieved puberty, and Nangeli and her husband
Chirukandan might have been paying it for a long time. However, in 1803, one day, the
suppressed anger and spirit of rebellion provoked Nangeli to challenge this inhuman and brutal
system of caste-based taxing and the Savarna gaze of measuring the size of the breasts and
defining the amount to be paid. Thus, instead of offering the customary tax, rice on a plantain
leaf, when the Pravarthiyar (the village tax collector) came, Nangeli used a sickle to cut off her
breasts and placed them on the plantain leaf, then bled to death. The horrified rulers fled the
place and later her body was cremated. Her husband Chirukandan, in grief, entered her funeral
pyre and died too (Mehrotra 2022). The very next day, King Sri Moolam Thirunal, issued a

4 , Vol.59, Issue No.2

proclamation that withdrew the breast tax and allowed the lower caste women to wear a shawl
to cover their breasts, thus providing Nangeli’s sacrifice a clear social output that saved the
dignity of people of caste and among them particularly of women. The place where Nangeli died
is now known as Mulachiparambu (the land of the breasted woman).

Portrayals and Perspectives

The Nangeli legend has got many artistic renditions before it was captured in the film
Pathonpatham Noottand. Sen’s graphic narrative, A Travancore Tale, which was published with a
tagline, “Remembering Nangeli on Rohith Vemula’s Shahadat day,” in 2017 graphically
represented the legend of Nangeli. However, if one examines the narrative and techniques of
narration, the very representation of caste discrimination becomes questionable. Why should the
artist in order to reveal the horror of the incident portray the bleeding breasts so closely? Is it
not again the eroticisation of the Dalit body? Pathonpatham Noottand is also not very different in
this aspect. When the film acknowledges the belligerence of Nangeli in mutilating and killing
herself as a response to the sexist and casteist violence inflicted upon women of her caste, the
film narrative does not do justice to the legend of Nangeli and the cause for which she bled and
died. What the film shows is in fact an eroticisation of the Dalit woman’s body; the nudity,
bloodshed, and the ensuing death are portrayed with the intention to evoke pity among the
spectators but in fact the sexualised and voyeuristic depiction does the contrary by catering to the
Savarna male gaze. Many discourses that apparently talk about the upper caste atrocities become
counter discourses by not being sensitive to the actual struggles of the Dalits.

The story of Nangeli was captured, without missing any elements of anguish, and unrest
preserving the true cause of her revolt, by Chithrakaran Murali—an artist based in
Kerala—through his paintings titled Nangeliyude Thyagam (Nangeli’s Sacrifice) and The Great
Nangeli. These paintings are different from any of the aforesaid depictions of the same story
because the artist here approaches the matter with great concern and sensitivity, which focus on
the caste system that violated human rights. His artistic sensibility and knowledge of historical
aspects of the Kerala society enable him to approach the subject matter with enough seriousness.
Thus, Nangeli’s Sacrifice I and II are paintings that critique the caste system that existed in the
Kerala society, and it also documents—through the written description that the artist provides

5 , Vol.59, Issue No.2

along with the painting—the unjust laws that were violating all human rights and were victimising
the lower caste people by depriving them of the rights to live with dignity. The Nangeli paintings
in his seriesAmana: Charithrathilillatha Chithrangal (Amana: The Hidden Pictures of History),
along with many similar incidents of caste-based violence being pictured, are attempts to retell
the history of oppression by problematising the hitherto depictions of this legend. The illustrious
combinations of colours that Murali uses in his paintings do not eroticise the narrative, but in fact
it poignantly and objectively emphasises the sacrifice of the Ezhava woman Nangeli.

The paintings titledNangeli’s Sacrifice I and II depict Nangeli bleeding to death after mutilating
herself and her very act of cutting off her breasts. Even though the narrative includes bloodshed,
the use of colours and the foregrounding technique used by the artist do not focus on the female
body or the organs but the Savarna gaze that is blindfolded by her very act. The next painting
in the Nangeli series, which is titled as The Great Nangeli, is a depiction of the whole point of
her struggles and sacrifice by giving her a goddess image and positioning her above the image of
Sree Padamanabha (the deity Vishnu). In his interview with the BBC (2016), Murali states: “I
did not want to depict it as a bloody event; instead, my aim was to glorify her act as an
inspiration to humanity, a representation that would command respect.” However, the goddess
image given to her is not using the usual upper caste ideals of a female deity. It is her act that
defines her divinity not the paraphernalia usually associated with Hindu gods and goddesses. It is
her rebellion against the caste system that projects her as a superhuman who stands above the
powers of Sree Padamanabha. Resurgence of Nangeli is envisaged by the artist through this
painting that also implies the attempts to veto the Savarna agency by portraying the Sree
Padamanabha figure at the feet of Nangeli and in the pool of blood her gallant act has
produced. Thus, the painting clearly moves away from the fight of Nangeli and her belligerence
being historically claimed as a fight to protect the female dignity by fighting for the rights to
clothe the breasts.

Hence, what makes Murali’s art different from that of Vinayan and Sen is the politics of caste it
dares to unveil deliberately. Through the portraits of Nangeli and fixing them within another
few dozens of similar paintings collected as Amana, he clearly marks his stance against the caste

6 , Vol.59, Issue No.2

politics of Kerala that celebrated the monarchy and the kindness and selflessness of the rulers at
the cost of consciously ignoring the struggles of the lower caste men and women who were
tormented by the inhuman justice system and rules and regulations that were shaped by the
privileged for the privileged.

Caste, Gender, and Recontextualisation

The legend of Nangeli, as the historian Manu S Pillai (2017) points out, eventually was debated
in the context of fighting for the cause of women challenging the patriarchal ideology that
hitherto shaped the dominant norms. It was at this juncture that the female question of dignity
and the indifferent attitudes of the upper caste towards the dignity of women and also the
question of the male gaze came into discussions. These deliberations underlined the significance
of Nangeli’s sacrifice as a revolutionary act as it not only challenged the system of levying tax on
breasts but was also seen as her revolution against the caste system that further divided men and
women. Iqbal (2020) argues that by amputating her breasts, “Nangeli proves that it is not about
man and woman being equal or not, but about being unique in their respective roles.” He
further maintains that

Apart from fighting the prevalent caste system and discrimination, Nangeli combines two protests
in one act. By cutting off her breasts, she removes the ‘sex organs’ to protest the lecherous gaze
of upper-caste men (or, in today’s context, any brazen male gaze). By removing her breasts,
Nangeli also equates women to men—or a social equality. (Iqbal 2020)

When Sen’s graphic novel A Travancore Tale and Vinayan’s film Pathonpatham Noottand
visualise Nangeli as the warrior of the female dignity, as the one who fought for the right to wear
clothes, the stark reality of the unjust caste system that she battled against submerges. In Murali’s
paintings, it is not the body politics that is primarily being dealt with. Murali tersely but
disparagingly questions the caste-based discrimination to which Nangeli was subjected to and
valorously fought against. Her body, in Murali’s art, is just a medium to carry out her revolt and
not the reason for the revolt. Pillai (2019) argues:

When Nangeli stood up, squeezed to the extremes of poverty by a regressive tax system, it was a
statement made in great anguish about the injustice of the social order itself. Her call was not to

7 , Vol.59, Issue No.2

celebrate modesty and honour; it was a siren call against caste and the rotting feudalism that
victimised those in its underbelly who could not challenge it. She was a heroine of all who were
poor and weak, not the archetype of middle-class womanly honour she has today become. But
they could not admit that Nangeli’s sacrifice was an ultimatum to the order, so they remodelled
her as a virtuous goddess, one who sought to cover her breasts rather than one who issued a
challenge to power. The spirit of her rebellion was buried in favour of its letter, and Nangeli
reduced to the sum of her breasts.

How then did this recontextualisation happen? It could probably be a result of the reading of
history that followed: the historical Channar Lahala (Channar Revolt) (Mehrotra 2022) through
which people of caste fought for their rights to clothe their torso. Nangeli might have been in the
historical imagination as a precursor of this movement, but certainly, breast tax was more about
caste than breasts. One cannot negate that this tax actually was a clandestine tool to proclaim the
gender differences as men were paying Thalakkaram (head tax) and women had to pay
Mulakkaram (breast tax). It is gender discrimination not in terms of clothing but that of defining
the bodies. Women were not taxed for their heads but for their breasts. The question that
Nangeli’s legend brings to the social forefront to debate and discuss is all about what is it that
defines a woman? Severing her breasts was her protest indeed and also it was her endeavour to
desexualise herself, thereby claiming her space not as a man or a woman but as a human in the
society. This essence is what is captured in the paintings of Murali when he problematises the
caste discrimination and caste-based violence along with the sharp depiction of the utter
insensitivity and indifference of the Savarna towards whom they termed as the “avarnas”. The
three texts that narrated the same legend unbridle the ideological loading along with their
historical perspectives. Issues in the artistic perception of a social history is connected to the
artist’s own ideological stance.

Casteism and the abiding prejudices are inherited. This legacy of the caste nomenclature and the
passive but deep-rooted aversion towards people who belong to the lower caste cannot be
annihilated easily from the society without being taught/trained to do so. Sadly, such discourses
are absent from our textbooks, and children grow up with this legacy of casteism along with a
set of other rotten value system and conservative ideals. Platforms that enable healthy debates
must be our classrooms, but they are very rare and many a time those historical struggles are

8 , Vol.59, Issue No.2

eliminated from the curriculum. Many such discourses or textbook entities are perceived as
“objectionable content” by the prevalent system. The removal of a chapter titled “Caste, Conflict
and Dress Change” from the social science curriculum of Class IX students by the Central Board
of Secondary Education? following the order of Madras High Court in 2019 is a testimony for
the “enforced amnesia” (Palit 2019) about caste struggles. When the state decides how to manage
and manipulate history and edit out those unfavourable segments that may threaten their agenda,
it is important that there emerge more artistic interventions, like that of Murali’s Nangeli
paintings, to demystify the legacy of caste system and emboss unbiased representations of those
pertinent questions through art.

References:

BBC (2016): “The woman who cut off her breasts to protest a tax,” 16 July,
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-36891356.

Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi (1983): “History from Below,” Social Scientist, Vol 11, No 4, pp

3–20.

Chithrakaran, Murali (2018): Nangeli's Sacrifice. http://chithrakaran.blogspot.com/2018/02/35.html.

C T, Vinayan (2022): Pathonpatham Noottand, Gokulam Gopalan Films.

Iqbal, Sabin (2020): “The Legend of Nangeli,” OPEN, 13 August,

https://openthemagazine.com/cover-story/the-legend-of-nangeli/.

Mehrotra, Deepti (2022): “Nangeli—the forgotten Dalit woman who stood up against Travancore’s ‘breast
tax,” The Print, 8 March, https://theprint.in/pageturner/excerpt/nangeli-the-forgotten-dalit-woman-
who-stood-up-against-travancores-breast-tax/862452/.

Palit, Maya (2016): “The CBSE Just Removed an Entire History of Women’s

Caste Struggle,” The Wire, 24 December, https://thewire.in/education/cbse- removed-history-

womens-caste-struggle.

Pillai S, Manu (2017): “The woman who cut off her breasts,” The Hindu,

9 , Vol.59, Issue No.2

 18 February, https://www.thehindu.com/society/history-and-culture/the-woman-who-cut-off-her-
breasts/article17324549.ece.

Pillai S, Manu (2019): “Revisiting Nangeli, the Woman with No Breasts,” Newsclick, 3

November, https://www.newsclick.in/Nangeli-Basava-Manu-Pillai-Indian-History-Travancore-
breast-tax.

Sen, Orijit (2017): “A Travancore Tale,” Guftugu. https://guftugu.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Orijit-.jpg.

10 , Vol.59, Issue No.2