Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Calcif. Tissue Int.

31, 45-47 (1980)


Calcified Tissue
International
,~ 1980 by Springer-Verlag

Use of Dermestid Beetles for Cleaning Bones

E. H e f t i , U . T r e c h s e l , H. R f i f e n a c h t , a n d H . F l e i s c h
Department of Pathophysiology. University of Berne. Murtenstrasse 35, 3010 Berne. Switzerland

Summary. Various parts of the skeleton of normal Material and Methods


and osteoporotic rats were compared with respect
to t h e i r d r y w e i g h t , a s h w e i g h t , a n d c a l c i u m c o n t e n t Dermestid Beetles
w h e n t h e b o n e s w e r e c l e a n e d b y Dermestes mac,-
latus b e e t l e s o r m a n u a l l y . B o t h t e c h n i q u e s g a v e The Dermestes maculatus beetles were a gift from Ciba-Geigy
similar results. This was also true when whole body research laboratories and bred in our institute. They were kept at
a temperature between 22~ and 28~ since lower temperatures
calcium measured by neutron activation and total
decrease their activity [3]. No attempt was made to regulate the
skeletal calcium from bones cleaned by the beetles humidity. The animals were kept in steel containers with a size of
were compared. Thus dermestid beetles are useful 30 • 50 • 30 cm. Macrolon plastic cages are not suitable because
as a t e c h n i q u e to c l e a n b o n e s , e s p e c i a l l y f o r t h e the larvae are able to burn holes through the walls of the boxes.
p a r t s o f t h e s k e l e t o n w h i c h a r e difficult to d i s s e c t b y A lid of fine plastic mesh. which permits free circulation of air,
hand. was used to cover the boxes [1]. Each box contained a few thou-
sand beetles since the population should be sufficiently large to
ensure rapid cleaning [3]. The danger of infestation and spread of
Key words: Dermestid beetles -- Cleaning bones --
the beetles to other rooms is small [2], as these insects feed only
Rats. on dead animal parts (cadavers, fur, feathers, leather) and as
room temperature reduces their activity. The beetles were fed
on greaves (remainders of industrial fat production) when no ca-
davers had to be cleaned.
Introduction

T h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f s m a l l a n i m a l b o n e s is a t e d i o u s Cleaning of Bones by the Dermestid Beetles


and time-consuming procedure. Some decades ago,
The rats were prepared by removing manually the skin and the
H a l l a n d R u s s e l l [1] s h o w e d t h a t d e r m e s t i d b e e t l e s
intestine. The animals were then put on a grid in the cages with-
and their larvae clean bones of small mammals out any additional preparations. It was found that after 24-48 h
within a reasonable time. Various authors con- the skeleton was free from soft tissues with the ligaments still
f i r m e d t h e e f f i c i e n c y o f this m e t h o d [2-4]. It w a s n o t holding most bones in position. It is necessary to remove the
s h o w n , h o w e v e r , if t h e b o n e s c l e a n e d b y t h e b e e t l e s skeleton at this moment, since longer exposure results in partial
w e r e s u i t a b l e f o r f u r t h e r q u a n t i t a t i v e a n a l y s i s o f pa- destruction of parts of the skeleton, the beetles attacking bone
r a m e t e r s s u c h as d r y w e i g h t , a s h w e i g h t , o r m i n e r a l when they are deprived of other food.
content.
I n this p a p e r w e i n v e s t i g a t e d w h e t h e r this t e c h -
nique could be used for this purpose by comparing Design for Assessing the Accuracy of the Method
the results obtained on various bones with those ob-
In order to establish whether the dry weight, ash weight, or cal-
t a i n e d a f t e r h a n d - c l e a n i n g . F u r t h e r m o r e , t o t a l skel- cium content of the bones processed by the beetles was different
etal calcium measured after cleaning by beetles was from that of bones processed by hand, we used a group of 22
c o m p a r e d to w h o l e b o d y c a l c i u m d e t e r m i n e d b y normal Wistar rats (150-450 g). Furthermore, a group of rats in
neutron activation. which osteoporosis was induced with low Ca diet. pregnancy.
and lactation [5, 6] was used in order to determine if the results
also apply to bones with this abnormality. One leg of the cadav-
ers was removed and cleaned by hand. The remaining portions of
Send offprint requests to E. Hefti at the above address. the cadavers were presented to the beetles. Hand-cleaned and

0171-967X/80/0031-0045 $01.00
46 E. Hefti et al.: Dermestid Beetles for Cleaning Bones

Fig. 1. Final dried skeleton


cleaned by dermestid beetles

beetle-cleaned tibiae and femora were dried at 85~ for 3 days m a j o r o f the f e m u r a n d the s u l c u s b e t w e e n the c o n -
and weighed. Afterwards the bones were ashed at a temperature d y l e s . F i g u r e s 2B a n d 2C s h o w the a s h w e i g h t a n d
of 700~ for another 3 days and reweighed. Finally, for calcium
c a l c i u m c o n t e n t o f the s a m e b o n e s . B o t h are a l m o s t
measurements the ash was dissolved in l N HCI.
To establish whether the technique was also applicable lbr the identical if c l e a n e d b y h a n d o r b y d e r m e s t i d b e e t l e s ,
spine, sections of two or three sacral vertebrae were measured the s l o p e o f the line b e i n g a b o u t 1. This is also true
with in vitro neutron activation [7] before and after cleaning by for o s t e o p o r o t i c r a t s , the ratio o f ash w e i g h t o f nor-
the beetles. mal v e r s u s b e e t l e - c l e a n e d t i b i a e being 0.999 -+ 0.016
Finally, the total body calcium of 5 normal and 5 osteoporotic (+_ SD) in t h e s e a n i m a l s .
rats measured with neutron activation analysis was compared to To i n v e s t i g a t e w h e t h e r p r o l o n g e d e x p o s u r e o f the
the whole skeletal calcium cleaned by derrnestid beetles and
measured after ashing. This is possible since total body calcium b o n e s to the d e r m e s t i d b e e t l e s l e a d s to the d e s t r u c -
is a good estimate for the' skeletal calcium as 99% of the total tion a n d loss o f b o n e , we c o m p a r e d d r y a n d ash
body calcium is contained in the skeleton. w e i g h t s o f v a r i o u s b o n e s , c l e a n e d for 1 d a y with
c o r r e s p o n d i n g b o n e s e x p o s e d to the b e e t l e s for up
to 5 d a y s . In long b o n e s the r a t i o b e t w e e n b o n e s
c l e a n e d for 1 d a y a n d t h o s e c l e a n e d for 5 d a y s w a s
Calcium Determination
1.001 --+ 0.028 for d r y weight a n d 1.013 -+ 0.038 for
Chemical calcium determination was done with a Corning Cal- a s h weight ( + S D , N = 20). H o w e v e r , this is not the
cium Analyzer (model 940). Whole body calcium determinations c a s e f o r m o r e v u l n e r a b l e p a r t s o f the s k e l e t o n , s u c h
were performed with neutron activation, the rats being irradiated as the iliac c r e s t a n d v e r t e b r a e , w h e r e m a c r o s c o p i c
with thermal neutron produced by a nuclear reactor, and the cal- lesions w e r e o b s e r v e d a f t e r l e a v i n g s k e l e t o n s w i t h
cium y-rays measured with a NaI crystal scintillation counter. the b e e t l e s for s e v e r a l d a y s . T h u s o f s e v e n v e r t e -
The technique is described in detail elsewhere [8].
b r a e a n a l y z e d b e f o r e a n d a f t e r e x p o s u r e , two w e r e
macroscopically damaged. The two damaged verte-
brae s h o w e d a c a l c i u m ratio o f 1.20 for c a l c i u m be-
Results f o r e / a f t e r c l e a n i n g . T h e o t h e r five b o n e s w e r e ap-
parently intact. The calcium analysis of these bones
F i g u r e 1 s h o w s the c l e a n e d s k e l e t o n a f t e r d r y i n g , gave a ratio o f 1.004 -+ 0.032 ( m e a n + SD) for cal-
l i g a m e n t s still h o l d i n g m o s t b o n e s in p o s i t i o n . c i u m b e f o r e / c a l c i u m a f t e r c l e a n i n g . It has to be
F i g u r e 2A s h o w s the d r y weight o f tibiae a n d fe- m e n t i o n e d , h o w e v e r , that s u c h a d e s t r u c t i o n o f
m o r a c l e a n e d b y b e e t l e s a n d b y h a n d . T h e s l o p e is b o n e o c c u r r e d o n l y if the c a r c a s s was e x p o s e d
s l i g h t l y a b o v e 1, s h o w i n g that the d r y weight o f the w h e n the a n i m a l s w e r e d e p r i v e d o f o t h e r f o o d . It
long b o n e s has a t e n d e n c y to be h i g h e r if c l e a n e d b y was n e v e r s e e n if the b o n e s w e r e w i t h d r a w n w h e n
hand. T h i s is e x p l a i n e d b y the fact that a l t h o u g h the m o s t o f the l i g a m e n t s w e r e still p r e s e n t .
soft t i s s u e s w e r e r e m o v e d a l m o s t c o m p l e t e l y b y the F i n a l l y , the t e c h n i q u e is a l s o valid for total s k e l e -
d e r m e s t i d b e e t l e s , the b o n e s c l e a n e d b y h a n d al- tal c a l c i u m s i n c e the ratio o f t h e t o t a l b o d y c a l c i u m
w a y s s h o w e d r e s i d u a l p a t c h e s o f c o n n e c t i v e tissue a n d c a l c i u m o f the s k e l e t o n p r o c e s s e d b y the
in fine c a v i t i e s , for e x a m p l e , n e x t to t h e t r o c h a n t e r b e e t l e s was 1.024 + 0.055 in n o r m a l rats a n d 0.984
E. Hefti et al.: Dermestid Beetles for Cleaning Bones 47

C A L C I UM
600
~ 1000-

O y9 0000 oo9000
C

T
r
C
0
.0

U
"D
C
r
500"

0 J
/
//
j
,Br.

5OO
" 9 Femur
9 Tibia

1;00
0
0
/
/
~

260
,Femur
.Tibia

460 600
50-

0
o
////
//
mur
5'0 16o 1~o 260
ia

0
A Beetle cleaned bones(rag) B B e e t l e cleaned bones (mg) C Beetle cleaned b o n e s (rag)

Fig. 2. Comparison of rat femur and tibia cleaned manually and cleaned by beetles. A Dry weight. 3' = 13.02 + 1.040 x, Y-' = 0.982. N =
43. B Ash weight. 3' = 1.50 + 1.006 x, r2 = 0.992, N = 42. C Calcium content, y = - 1.45 + 1.028 x, r 2 = 0.998, N = 32

_+ 0.034 (mean -+ SD) in osteoporotic rats. The ab- sistance with the illustrations and Mrs. B. Gyger for preparing
solute amount of total body calcium was 3725 -+ 209 the manuscript. This work was supported by the Swiss National
mg in the normal and 2684 -+ 301 mg (mean -+ SD) in Science Foundation (3.725.76) and by the Ausbildungs- und
F6rderungsfonds der Arbeitsgemeinschaft ftir Osteosynthese
the osteoporotic rats.
(AO), Switzerland.

Discussion References

1. Hall, E.R., Russell, W.C.: Dermestid beetles as an aid in


Thus dermestid beetles are able to clean bones effi-
cleaning bones, J. Mammal. 14:58-59, 1933
ciently within a short time, and the bones obtained 2. Hooper, E.T.: Use of dermestid beetles instead of cooking
are suitable for further analysis. This is especially pots, J. Mammal. 31:100-102, 1950
useful for parts of the skeleton that can be dissected 3. Russell, W.C.: Biology of the dermestid beetle with refer-
by hand only with great difficulty, such as spine or ences to skull cleaning, J. Mammal. 28:284-287, 1947
skull. So far this method has been used for cleaning 4. de la Torre, L.: A method for cleaning skulls of specimens
preserved in alcohol, J. Mammal. 32:231-232, 1951
the skeletons of about 200 rats in our laboratory.
5. Rasmussen, P.: Calcium deficiency, pregnancy and lactation
No bone substance is destroyed if the skeletons in rats. Some effects on blood chemistry and the skeleton,
are carefully o b s e r v e d during the cleaning process Calcif. Tissue Res. 23:87-94, 1977
and the bones are r e m o v e d while the ligaments are 6. Rasmussen, P.: Calcium deficiency, pregnancy and lactation
still partially intact. Since the speed of cleaning is a in rats. Microscopic and microradiographic observations on
function of population composition, population bones, Calcif. Tissue Res. 23:95-102. 1977
size, amount of offered food, temperature, and 7. Guinn, V.P., Hoste, J.: Elemental analysis of biological mate-
rials by neutron activation analysis (IAEA-SM-227/102). Pro-
light, exposure of the bones to the beetles for a
ceedings of an International Symposium on Nuclear Activa-
fixed, predetermined time is not possible. Even if tion Techniques in Life Sciences, International Atomic En-
the bones are attacked by the animals, it is easily ergy Agency, Vienna. Austria, 1978
seen by eye, since the process is such that pieces of 8. Schubiger, P.A., Jakob, K., Ferreira-Marques, F.M., Hefti,
conspicuous size b e c o m e detached. E., Trechsel, U., Miihlbauer, R., Fleisch, H.: Determination
of whole body calcium in vivo in rats by neutron activation
analysis, Int. J. Nucl. Med. Biol. in press.
Acknowledgments. We wish to thank Dr. P. Schubiger for per-
forming the neutron activation analyses, Mrs. C. Stieger for as- Received September 25. 1979 / Accepted October 26, 1979

You might also like