Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bridge Engineering Intro 19may2024 (Ir Low HF)
Bridge Engineering Intro 19may2024 (Ir Low HF)
Crosshead Bearing
PERMANENT TRANSIENT
(VARIABLE)
Soil
Pressure
11,400
500 3500 3500 500
3500
Walkway Marginal Traffic Lane Traffic Lane Marginal Walkway
Carriageway
Strip Strip
Notional Lane Notional Lane Notional Lane
50mm Premix 200THK SLAB
11,400
500 3500 3500 500
3500
Walkway Marginal Traffic Lane Traffic Lane Marginal Walkway
Carriageway
Strip Strip
Notional Lane Notional Lane Notional Lane
50mm Premix 200THK SLAB
For determination of general effects, the tandems travel along the axis of the
notional lanes
UiTM Guest Lecture: Intro to Bridge Engineering 12
LOAD MODEL (NORMAL TRAFFIC LOAD) - EC
5.5kN/m2
For local verifications,
the heaviest tandem
should be positioned
5.5kN/m2 to get the most
unfavourable effect.
5.5kN/m2
5.5kN/m2
(ii) Special Order Vehicle, SOV model vehicles (SOV250, SOV350, SOV450 and SOV600)
(BS EN 1991-2:2003
Clause 4.3.4 + UK NA.2.16)
1.25m
• Wind Load on a bridge depends on the geographical location, local topography, height of
bridge above ground, and the horizontal dimensions and cross section of the bridge. In
Malaysia, the basic hourly mean wind speed can be taken as 25m/s (or 30m/s for 3s gust)
• Maximum wind load shall be applied to bridges without live load. Lower wind load is
allowed for bridge structure with live load (but larger area of exposure with live load taken
as 2.5m above carriageway).
• Wind Load to be applied in all directions;
- Transverse
- Longitudinal
- Vertical
• Hydraulic Forces on bridge substructures shall be considered if piers are located within a
river channel. Hydraulic force depends on the speed of river current and the shape of the
substructures (drag coefficient). It should be applied in the direction parallel to river flow.
(ii) Difference in temperature between top surface and other levels in the superstructure.
These temperature difference/ gradient effect result in load effects within the superstructure.
+13.5oC -8.4oC
-0.5oC
+3.0oC
-1.0oC
+2.5oC -6.5oC
30m
Precast Beams
FREE FIX
30000
• A basic form of bridge is consisted of Precast Beams with Cast In-Situ Deck Slab,
Simply-Supported on Bearings at Abutment.
• Two RC End Diaphragms are designed to tie the beams at abutment only; with no
intermediate diaphragms – a modern design to avoid expensive formwork over river.
• Dowel bars are installed at Fixed End with shear blocks.
UiTM Guest Lecture: Intro to Bridge Engineering 21
UNDERSTANDING A BRIDGE STRUCTURE
Abut Abut
A B
30m
Precast Beams 8000 Carriageway
Walkway Notional Lane Notional Lane Notional Lane Walkway
FREE FIX
200mm Slab
• This bridge has 8 nos of precast prestressed I17 spanning longitudinally between
abutments with a deck slab (200mm) spanning transversely across the beam top.
• For longitudinal bending, the slab acts as top flange of the beams, and since the slab has a
bending stiffness much lower than that of a beam, it flexes much more transversely than
longitudinally, to span between beams a straightforward beam-and slab scheme.
• For UDL (uniformly distributed load), eg. self weight, all the bridge beams deflect
simultaneously and support those loads belong to their own tributary.
Similar to the
1.4m
1.4m beam-and-slab
Tributary
1.4m
behavior of a building
if subjected to UDL
Precast Beam @ 1.4m c/c
• Load Distribution between directly loaded members and other members further away
will occur as a consequence of the rigidity or stiffness of the transverse deck slab.
• The stiffer (or thicker) the slab, the more beams will be able to share the loads. The
maximum load to the nearest beam will also be reduced because the same amount of the
load is now shared by more beams.
• This structural interaction between beams and slabs depend greatly on their relative
stiffness and it requires a more rigorous analysis in 3-dimensional environment. Nowadays,
this is carried out by computer programme and software.
MY CONTACT EMAIL:
lowhf@osdconsultants.com.my
http://linkedin.com/in/hin-foo-low-a33332236
UiTM Guest Lecture: Intro to Bridge Engineering 24