Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ticon The Design of Moldings in Engineering Plastics Farbig
Ticon The Design of Moldings in Engineering Plastics Farbig
engineering plastics
Guidelines for the design of moldings in
COPYRIGHT:
All rights reserved, in particular for reproduction and copying, and for distribution as well as for
translation. No part of this publication may be reproduced or processed by means of electronic
systems, reproduced or distributed (by photocopying, microfilm or any other process), without written
permission by Ticona.
NOTICE TO USERS:
To the best of our knowledge, the information contained in this publication is accurate, however we do
not assume any liability whatsoever for the accuracy and completeness of such information. The
information contained in this publication should not be construed as a promise or guarantee of specific
properties of our products.
Further, the analysis techniques included in this publication are often simplifications and, therefore,
approximate in nature. More vigorous analysis techniques and prototype testing are strongly
recommended to verify satisfactory part performance. Anyone intending to rely on any recommendation
or to use any equipment, processing technique or material mentioned in this publication should satisfy
themselves that they can meet all applicable safety and health standards.
It is the sole responsibility of the users to investigate whether any existing patents are infringed by the
use of the materials mentioned in this publication.
Properties of molded parts can be influenced by a wide variety of factors including, but not limited to,
material selection, additives, part design, processing conditions and environmental exposure. Any
determination of the suitability of a particular material and part design for any use contemplated by the
user is the sole responsibility of the user. The user must verify that the material, as subsequently
processed, meets the requirements of the particular product or use. The user is encouraged to test
prototypes or samples of the product under the harshest conditions to be encountered to determine the
suitability of the materials.
Material data and values included in this publication are either based on testing of laboratory test
specimens and represent data that fall within the normal range of properties for natural material or were
extracted from various published sources. All are believed to be representative. These values alone do
not represent a sufficient basis for any part design and are not intended for use in establishing
maximum, minimum, or ranges of values for specification purposes. Colorants or other additives may
cause significant variations in data values.
We strongly recommend that users seek and adhere to the manufacturer’s current instructions for
handling each material they use, and to entrust the handling of such material to adequately trained
personnel only. Please call the numbers listed for additional technical information. Call Customer
Services at the number listed for the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) before
attempting to process our products. Moreover, there is a need to reduce human exposure to many
materials to the lowest practical limits in view of possible adverse effects. To the extent that any
hazards may have been mentioned in this publication, we neither suggest nor guarantee that such
hazards are the only ones that exist.
The products mentioned herein are not intended for use in medical or dental implants.
Ticona GmbH
Information Service
Tel. +49 (0) 180-584 2662 (Germany)
+49 (0) 69-305 16299 (Europe)
Fax +49 (0) 180-202 1202 (Germany and Europe)
e-mail infoservice@ticona.de
Internet www.ticona.com
Contents 1. Introduction
3. Guidelines for
-
processing conditions
-
modified with reinforcing materials putable. To illustrate the points we wish to make, we will
refer to examples of components which for different
Celanex reasons have failed in service. We will discuss the causes
Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) of failure and suggest, as far as possible, how to remedy
the defects on the basis of the "design guidelines".
Hostalen GUR
Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene
(PE-UHMW)
=
registered trademark
2. General comments
A qualitative comparison between the molding shrinkage
of partially crystalline and of amorphous thermoplastics
on molding design (figs. 1, 2 and 3) makes it clear that differences, e.g. in
mold wall temperature, lead to greater differential mold
ing shrinkage partially crystalline thermoplastics
MS in
An important requirement molding dimen
is that actual than in amorphous materials. To this extent, moldings
sions should conform to the required shape (drawing made from amorphous thermoplastics are less prone to
dimensions) within the permissible tolerance limits for warpage.
plastics. By "permissible tolerance limits for plastics" we
mean limits which take into account the fact that plastics Fig. 1 : Molding shrinkage MS as a function of cavity
generally have a higher coefficient of thermal expansion pressure.
than metals, that mold shrinkage and post-shrinkage pro
duce time-dependent dimensional changes in the molding
etc. As a result, it is not usually possible to achieve ISO
To produce moldings that are as free as possible from Fig. 2: Molding shrinkage MS as a function of mold
-a
'; Note:
I
to
^
Shrinkage
Wall thickness s holding pressure times ÎNI to tN4 would have to be set
per cavity, which is not technically possible. The holding
a partially crystalline thermoplastics pressure time to be set would thus represent only a com
b amorphous thermoplastics promise and would have an adverse effect on molding
quality.
In practice, these maximum requirements can only be The pressure drop Ap is described by Hagen-Poisseuille's
approximately met. Thus measurements of pressure law:
versus shrinkage along the flow path of a flat rectangular
G, V^1
Pi Ü X^ S
/ > \
-a '
>"" ^
"
. 5
* G4
S /
/
\p
*NI IN*
AMS
Shrinkage
Pressure
Table 1 Note:
Because the melt stream is split up with multi-point gating
Increase in ...
Causes pressure drop to ... (fig. 8), a weld line is formed in the center of the molding
where the flow fronts unite. In most cases, this is a weak
Flow path length 1 increase (-)
point and frequently also causes a visible flow mark. The
Viscosity r\ increase (-) same effect generally occurs behind any obstacle around
additional ribs).
Fig. 8: Shortening flow path length by suitable gate melt flowability or the level of pressure, the depth of the
location; multi-point gating. venting channels should be between a few wm and a
maximum of 0.03 mm. The venting channels should be
Weld line polished to avoid deposits in these areas. Venting chan
nels are at risk from corrosion and must be protected by
selection of an appropriate steel or suitable surface
coating.
run), weld strength can be significantly increased. shrinkage and at cross-sectional transition points can in
some circumstances cause surface marks or even increase the
Fig. 10: Improvement in weld strength by diverting notch effect. Cross-sectional changes are therefore not
the flow front. generally permissible without certain provisos. Often just
a few tenths of a millimeter judiciously ground off the core,
'
'
' / f / / I
Y -~
No. 1: Sheet
Lw- or where Jl =
Lw -
L
i _
"
MS
100
MS
r ^
J1=L w Soft cc Solidified frame
100
Contour shrunk
As a result of the rapid cooling in the corner
more
Jjr
MSr (radius r), thickness shrinkage MSj and circum direction (stretching flow). If this elongation is frozen-in,
ferential or tangential shrinkage MSt. Because of the orientation will be produced at right angles to the flow
change in length At in the tangential direction, there is direction. By using wide gates (film gates), this distor
a change in the (right) angle y>. This causes the mold tion/stretching effect can be diminished or eliminated
ing to deviate from the required shape. Differential completely, depending on the width of the gate. As a
shrinkage a MS MSr MSt generally leads to
= -
result, the warpage tendency will generally be less with
twisting or arching of the surface [4]. this type of gating [4].
Fig. 14
1 h
t t t
1 \-
t t 1
1 1-
Gate
No. 3: Stepped sheet
S2>S|
Problem
Cause:
The extent of shrinkage depends on wall thickness
(fig. 15). The side with wall thickness Si shrinks less
which 7-
and is thusrelatively longer can cause folding
and also warpage in region $2-
Corrective measure:
c
Try as far as possible to ensure uniform wall thickness. "a
o
s
Note:
Corrective measure:
.ivi- i')x-
Problem
shrinkage.
Cause:
The extent of shrinkage is
dependent on mold wall
temperature (fig. 16). The side with the higher mold
wall temperature $^2 shrinks (shortens) more than
i
the side with mold wall temperature $wi (bimetallic ft
effect) and the molding arches.
-i
Corrective measure: s
T3
Try as far as possible to ensure uniform mold wall
I
temperatures.
Note:
molded pan with *W *W2
In a surfaces having different textures
Mold wall temperature
(e. g. one side polished, the other grained), warpage
can occur despite uniform mold wall temperatures
10
No. 5: Angle
Void
$W1 $W2
s* = i/2-s 1,4- s
Problem Fig. 17
Cause:
Despite uniform mold wall temperatures $wi $W2> =
reduced cooling
Corrective measures:
Note:
Because of the reduction in wall thickness, an undercut
"H" is formed in the relevant demolding direction.
11
No. 6: T-profile
i
T
Problem
Cause:
Sink mark as a result of excessive web width a and
O
Corrective measures:
Increase effective
holding pressure (figs. 18 and 20).
Web width a
Increase mold wall temperature $w (fig. 18).
Choose more suitable design solution (fig. 19).
Use a blowing agent (e. g. Hostatron system Fig. 19
1 to 1.5 s
*; Note:
Demolding in the rib direction is possible only with splits Wall thickness reduction
because of the undercut H. in the transition*)
12
Fig. 20 Fig. 21 : Gating for an eye on a wall.
o
S
The reason for the expected sink marks is not the web
width a but the dimension x:
P>
Fig. 22 Fig. 23
Lj
Cause:
Transversely fed ribs, fig. 23, are often incompletely
formed in the vicinity of the gate. Since the melt
takes the path of least flow resistance, the melt can
come to a standstill in thin ribs and thus freeze pre
Rib maturely. This prevents the rib region being filled.
Corrective measures are not always possible in such
cases.
Cause:
Feeding through the rib, fig. 22. As a result of the
so-called fountain effect (nodal point in fig. 22),
a clearly visible matt line is formed above the rib area
Corrective measure:
13
No. 7: Box with base
1X..IU
\,S
1 L
V"\ "~
1
h-,--
(fig. 24):
Cause:
Walls:
See no. 5.
Increase wall thickness towards the center
Fig. 25
& -s
Unfavorable Corrective measure
a
V; :v
<* *>*
I
Ejectors
^ZZZZZZ3_j, i
Hat
ejectors
Note: Nate:
Watch forpossible undercut. Ifpossible do not me ejectors in the comers of the
box because where there is an ejector, mold cooling is
inadequate (fig. 25).
14
No. 8: Box with partition wall
S I S
/ /
/
Problem Fig. 27
Fig. 26 Fig. 28
As a general rule:
' 1 /
/
/ ! ;
/ /
Thick ribs "pull" walls inwards
SB
^1
"o
z
f^^222^
t t t /
;
Wall thickness
15
No. 9: Snap-fit element
Problem
Cause:
See no. 5.
Corrective measures:
16
No. 10: Internally stressed cylinder
/ // / / /^
-f u __1Î-
Cutl 7
/
-^ *-
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ à
Cut 2
m &"
Void
Note:
To make a quality assessment of the internal stress con
dition or warpage tendency of a molding, cuts are made
through it. Depending on the extent to which deforma
tion has been restricted, the cuts will liberate internal
stresses which thenoften produce clearly visible warping.
To match up the cut faces again (cuts 1 and 2), opposing
forces 5?^ are required, i. e. the deformation is (theoreti
cally) reversed. With this experiment, the internal stress
condition of a molding can be readily assessed in terms
of quality.
17
No. 1 1 : Screw boss
,'Smk "ii.tr''
/ / "
y / '
' *
*. / / / (
'/'
./ ^
/ /
X
''
S ' '
*
'
V//. r / / / A
'., / /
/ /
/
/
/
/
/ /
/
X
/ / /
/ /
/
/
( {
Problem Note:
If the beat content zs too high or there zs inadequate
Formation of a sink mark. cooling, a glossy mark may form in region 1 (fig. 30).
The same also applies to ejector pins (fig. 31).
Causes: Because of the expanding effect of thread-catting screws
Poor heat conduction from the core hole. and hence the risk of crack formation, the core hole dia
Vacuum effect through the cylindrical core. meter d in region 2 (fig. 30) should be enlarged. The
Fig. 30
Cooling
Corrective
measure:
cooled
ejector
<>
Cooling channels in the
vicinity of the ejectors
<-^2
18
No. 12: Sheathed metal shaft
Problem Note:
As a of creep stress on the plastic sheathing, cracking
result
Cracking in the plastic sheathing of a metal shaft. can occur in the relatively long term (months to years!).
Corrective measures:
& = 80 to 100C).
Provide the pressfit joint with a separately made
plastic bushing [13].
W
No. 13: Threaded spindle with handwheel
Stce! h^h
/ Tbuwl
/
/
i
ld; y>/jr//'Ayy
V/A\/\/
, I
/ / w / /rr/7^
f'& 7 yl 'I/ I
3-
/ / IT / /'S///\\/{t
//WYSri^LA^^ /
\ ', '
/ y / '
Note:
To tot design strength, a thermal cycling test (e.g. at -30
and + 80C) has proved suitable.
20
No. 14: Cylinder with internal tube under internal pressure stress
Supporting fin
Cylinder
v'^ ^
Flexural Supporting
stress fin
X Tensile stress
Corrective measures:
deformation (i. e. without supporting fins) and an of restriction can be kept down to reasonable limits by
internal pressure stress of pi pa p> only the dia
= =
increasing the wall thickness s2. In the "K"
region,
meter d2 of the cylinder would increase by adequately dimensioned radii should be provided to
minimize notch effect (but risk of sink marks).
M2 =
^dl or
Ad2 _
p d2
100%
2 s2 E d2 :~2-s2-E Verify optimization steps through long-term trials under
simulated practical conditions (acceleration is possible
Since the cylinder and internal tube are supported by by using higher temperatures). Avoid the present design
fins, this diameter increase is largely prevented. As a as far as possible. A possible design solution for joining
result, tensile stresses are set up in the fins, which are the internal tube to the cylinder while largely avoiding
increased by the notch effect at "K". Superimposed on shrinkage restriction is shown in fig. 33.
these stresses may be
shrinkage stresses arising perhaps
from non-uniform cooling conditions. The cylinder Fig. 33
and internal tube undergo a shape deviation when
there is sufficiently high flexural stress in the "K"
regions.
e
Note:
When the supporting fins exceed a certain thickness,
sink marks are formed on the cylinder surface and inside
21
No. 15: Screwed joint
Plastic
'
Metal
Problem Fig. 35
Causes:
Expanding action of a countersunk screw due to
initial screw stress (fig. 34).
Distance a is too short.
Corrective measures:
Position of gate
more favorable than ,
Move weld line by relocating gate (fig. 35). since a2 > a,
Use cylindrical screw (figs. 36 a and 36 b).
Increase distance a.
Fig. 36 a Fig. 36 b
Note:
As a result ofstress relaxation, the screwed joint can loosen.
Cn
For this reason, it is advisable to me shoulder screws A
(fig. 36 a) or split metal sleeves (fig. 37) (see also photo 13,
page 34).
Fig. 34
Fig. 37
split metal
sleeve
Pr =
Pa when = 45
22
No. 16: Split piston ring
0.5
Section A B
Section A B
Problem Fig. 38
Cause:
Angular deviation, see section A -
B (see also no. 5).
Corrective measure:
Section A-B
23
No. 17: Clip
Crack
Reinforcing rib
Problem Fig. 39 a
Cause:
Restricted deformation due to a reinforcing rib which
6 -*
Sperm.
Corrective measures:
>e~
J_
kperm. U2
1 l
24
No. 18: Non-detachable snap-fit joint
Possible
Weld line cracks
Spring element
Problem Fig. 40
Rounded corners
Causes:
Cracking due to sharp, unrounded edges in the
joint opening.
Cracking in the center of one side of the opening
promoted by a weld line.
i. element rigid Wall thickening
y too great, e. spring
Ratio too
25
No. 19: Deflection of differently shaped profiles
Load IF
|F
J
1 rssssf^
i
B, H, s =
constant
r3
\
"si m
\
relative deflection f
Problem Fig. 41
F-P F /f
f =
3E-J
26
No. 20: Torsional rigidity of different U profiles
1.53
I
13.56
i
14.06
1 I 1
27.29 29.76 28.10
n
10.58
Problem Fig. 42
180 Mt-l
Q-
JT "G-Jp
To keep the angle of torsion Q as low as possible, the
product of the shear modulus G and polar moment of
inertia Jp should be as large as possible (G Jp =
"torsional rigidity").
27
No. 21: Snap-in hook with engaging lug and cut-out
1
f
II \ ; >.
\
p ;\'
Possible
\
cracks
/
/ s
^
X*
Problem
Causes:
Design toorigid because li is too short.
Notch effect due to sharp edges of the cut-out
i
^G\ J
promotes cracking.
^^ ill j1 1
i,
Corrective measures:
Rounded
~~~~
-
.
l
edges (r)
Try to attain a more flexible design (la > li and if
possible reduce s), i. e. reduce the localized elonga-
Î
done-
-^[8] (fig. 43). n X
S
f
^
28
No. 22: Components anchored in a baseplate (outsert molding)
Problem
Cause:
Tight anchorage of the plastic component in the
baseplate (outsert technique) leads to shrinkage
stresses (which can also cause a metal baseplate to
Corrective measures:
(fig. 44).
_
Note:
Accurate positioning of the component is not guaranteed
when using an elongated hole in the baseplate.
Stretch out thick ribs must workclosely with material suppliers, mold makers
Avoid flat surfaces and injection molders, drawing on a collective pool of
Radius corners and edges experience.
29
4. Examples of applications
Photo 1: Lantern gearwheel made from Hostafonn with
feather key and internal hexagonal screw. Became of the
sharp-edged design of the key and weakening of the cross-
section due to the thread, stress is increased by the notch
effect. The crack originates in the notched base of the key.
For corrective measures see photo 2.
30
Photo 4: Internally stressed cylinder made from Hostaform
(see also section 3, no. 10).
In addition to void formation, sink marks and warpage,
it is possible to discern angular distortion in the base region
on the right of the photo liberated by a saw cut. The angu
lar distortion is an indication of the internal stresses in that
Note:
The cracks were made visible by the dye penetration
method. / Flash: cracking from inside to outside.
Note:
The use of blowing agents in processing Hostaform,
Celanex and Hostalen GUR is generally not recom
mended.
31
Photo 7: Brake cable conduit made from Hostaform
(modified with MoS2) in warped condition. Corrective
measure: the tendency to warp can be overcome by reduc
32
Photo 10: Fire extinguisher head made from glass-fiber-
reinforced Hostaform. Cracking due to restricted deforma
tion (design- and material-dependent) and notch effect (\)
in the rib base. Unfavorable design. Improvement possible
33
Photo 13: Fixing lug on a radiator fan shroud made from
Hostalen PP with split metal sleeve. This design will
effectively counter any loosening of the screw joint under
service stress (extreme temperature variations, vibration).
Service temperature range: -40 to +80C.
Photo 15: Furniture door look with aflat spring made from
Hostaform. spring A, the rigid design of the spring ele
In
34
Photo 16: Gearwheel made from Hostaform (dk 11 mm)
=
at 3.
35
Photo 19: Switch lever with spherical bearing point made
from Hostaform. Because of uneven wall thickness distribu
tion and large material accumulation it is difficult to injec
tion mold a uniformly curved sphere (left). Corrective
measure: a design suitable for plastics can be achieved by
36
5. Explanation ofsymbols 6. Literature
Unit
[1] Hoechst AG: C.3.3 Design of moldings made from
Symbol Explanation
engineering plastics.
E N/mm2 elastic modulus
[2] ISO basic tolerances for linear dimensions
F N load
DIN 7151.
G N/mm2 shear modulus
H mm undercut
[3] R. P.Hegler: Faserorientierung beim Verarbeiten
J mm4 axial moment of inertia
kurzfaserverstärkter Thermoplaste,
JP mm4 polar moment of inertia Kunststoffe 74 (1984) 5, pp. 271 -277.
L,l mm length on the molding,
flow path length
N
[4] W. Woebcken: Orientierungserscheinungen in
Mt mm torque Preß- und Spritzgießteilen,
P N/mm2 initial screw stress
Kunststoffe 51 (1961) 9, pp. 547-562.
V cmVs time-dependent volume flow
MS % molding shrinkage
dimensions on the molding
[5] U. Haack,J. Riecke: Verstärktes und gefülltes
a, b, d, t mm
f mm deflection
Polypropylen Eigenschaften, Anforderungen und
-
r mm radius
Problemlösungen in der Elektrogeräteindustrie,
Plastverarbeiter (1982) 9-12.
P bar, N/mm2 pressure, injection pressure
s mm wall thickness
[6] N. N. : Kupfer-Knetlegierungen, Informationsschrift
a,<p 0
angle on molding der Zollern Stahl und Metall GmbH & Co.,
A signifies change in the value
of the variable which follows it,
72488 Sigmaringen.
e.g. 41, Zip
[7] N. Klein: Neuere Untersuchungen über das Warm
perm. elongation, permissible
lagern von Präzisions-Spritzgußteilen aus Acetal-
elongation
melt
Copolymerisat,
n Pa- s dynamic viscosity of the Plastverarbeiter (1971) 3.
& C temperature
o
0 twisting angle
shear rate, velocity gradient
[8] Hoechst AG: B. 3. l Design calculations for snap-fit
joints in plastic pans.
similar, proportional
(axial pitch) bei
[9] R. Bald et al.: Steifigkeitsprobleme großflächigen
approximately, approximately Karosserieteilen aus Chemiewerkstoffen,
equal to ATZ 83 3.
(1981)
O gate location
directing of force, jointing
direction
[10] Patent specification DE 27 14 020 CE.
precision in Hostaform.
37
Engineering plastics
Design Calculations Applications
Publications so far in this series:
A. Engineering plastics
A. 1.1 Grades and properties -
Hostaform
A. 1.2 Grades and properties -
Hostacom
A. 1.4 Grades and properties -
Hostalen GUR
A. 1.5 Grades and properties -
Celanex,
Vandar, Impet
A.2.1 Calculation principles
A.2.2 Hostaform -
Characteristic values and
calculation examples
A.2.3 Hostacom -
Characteristic values and
calculation examples
B. Design of technical mouldings
B. 1.1 Spur gears with gearwheels made from
Hostaform, Celanex and Hostalen GUR
B.2.2 Worm gears with worm wheels made from
Hostaform
B.3.1 Design calculations for snap-fit joints in plastic
parts
B.3.2 Fastening with metal screws
38
In this technical information brochure, Hoechst aims to
39
Hostaform ® , Celcon ®
polyoxymethylene copolymer (POM)
Celanex®
thermoplastic polyester (PBT)
Impet ®
thermoplastic polyester (PET)
Vandar®
thermoplastic polyester alloys
Riteflex®
thermoplastic polyester elastomer (TPE-E)
Vectra ®
liquid crystal polymer (LCP)
Fortron ®
polyphenylene sulfide (PPS)
Celstran ® , Compel ®
long fiber reinforced thermoplastics (LFRT)
GUR ®
ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (PE-UHMW)
Europe
Ticona GmbH
Information Service
Tel.: +49 (0) 180-5 84 26 62 (Germany)
+49 (0) 69-30 51 62 99 (Europe)
Fax: +49 (0) 180-2 02 12 02
eMail: infoservice@ticona.de
Internet: www.ticona.com
Americas
Ticona LLC
Product Information Service
Tel.: +1-800-833-4882
Fax: +1-908-598-4306
eMail: prodinfo@ticona.com
Internet: www.ticona.com