Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sas 12 Den 032
Sas 12 Den 032
Sas 12 Den 032
A. LESSON PREVIEW/REVIEW
Introduction
Did you know that tumors does not only originate from the epithelium but can also originate from the
mesenchyme, or can be both epithelial and mesenchymal origin? With this lesson, you will know
more about odontogenic tumors aside from epithelial tumors.
1. What is
cementoblastoma?
B. MAIN LESSON
Activity 2: Content Notes
Mesenchymal tumors include entities originating from mesodermal-derived precursor cells that
develop into bone, cartilage, or other connective tissues, such as blood vessels, adipose
tissue, smooth muscle, or fibroblasts; in the CNS they most commonly arise from the
meninges rather than the CNS parenchyma.
ODONTOGENIC TUMORS
DISEASES CLINICAL FEATURES CAUSES RADIOGRAPHIC
FEATURES
Odontogenic Odontogenic myxoma is a benign Odontogenic Radiographically, this
Myxoma mesenchymal lesion that mimics myxomas (OMs) are lesion is always lucent,
microscopically the dental pulp or benign tumors although the pattern may
follicular connective tissue. It is a derived from be quite variable. It may
relatively common odontogenic embryonic appear as a well-
tumor, representing 1% to 17% of mesenchymal circumscribed or diffuse
all tumor types. elements of dental lesion. It often is
The age range in which this anlage. OM appears multilocular with a
lesion appears extends from 10 to originate from honeycomb pattern. Other
to 50 years, with a mean of about dental papilla, radiographic patterns and
30 years. There is no gender follicle, or descriptors include
predilection, and the lesions are periodontal “honeycomb,” “soap
seen anywhere in the mandible ligament. The bubble,” or “tennis racket.”
and maxilla with about equal evidence for its Cortical expansion or
frequency. odontogenic origin perforation and root
arises from its displacement or resorption
almost exclusive may be seen.
location in the tooth
bearing areas of the
jaws, its occasional
association with
missing or
Figure 1: Odontogenic myxoma showing characteristic multilocularity (left Figure 2: Central Odontogenic Fibroma
photo); clinical manifestation at the mandible ©Regezi et al; ©sciencedirect of the mandible ©Head and Face Medicine
Figure 3: Cementifying Fibroma. Extraoral presentation (left photo); intraoral presentation (middle photo);
radiographic presentation showing the affected antrum of highmore. ©jisppd.com
ODONTOGENIC TUMORS
DISEASES TREATMENTS/MANAGEMENTS
Odontogenic Myxoma Surgical excision (conservative to radical) is the treatment of choice.
However, because of its loose, gelatinous consistency and absence of a
capsule, recurrence is more likely if the lesion is treated too conservatively.
Although these lesions exhibit some aggressiveness and have a moderate
recurrence rate, the prognosis is very good. Repeated surgical procedures
do not appear to stimulate growth or metastasis. Follow-up examinations
should be performed for a minimum of 5 years.
Central Odontogenic Treatment of odontogenic fibroma is enucleation or excision, and recurrence
Fibroma is very uncommon. An exception in terms of recurrence potential is the
odontogenic fibroma with a central giant cell lesion component, in which a
23% rate of recurrence has been reported.
Cementifying
Fibroma Treatment of cemento-ossifying fibroma generally has been by conservative
enucleation or curettage or radical surgery depending on the size and
location of the individual lesion. They are characterised by easy shell out
from the surrounding bone. Mandibular central cemento-ossifying fibromas
usually shell out easily at surgery, but maxillary central cemento-ossifying
fibromas are more difficult to remove completely than mandibular central
cemento-ossifying fibromas. This may be attributable to the difference in
bone character between the mandible and maxilla and to the available apace
ODONTOGENIC TUMORS
DISEASES CLINICAL FEATURES CAUSES RADIOGRAPHIC
FEATURES
Ameloblastic Ameloblastic fibroma and Ameloblastic fibro- Radiographically, these
Fibroma and ameloblastic fibro-odontoma are odontoma is a lesion lesions are well
Ameloblastic considered together because they similar to circumscribed and
Fibro- appear to be slight variations of the Ameloblastic Fibroma, usually are surrounded
odontoma same benign neoplastic process. but also showing by a sclerotic margin.
Except for the presence of an inductive changes They may be unilocular
odontoma, people afflicted with that lead to the or multilocular and may
either of these two lesions share formation of both be associated with the
similar features of age, gender, and dentin and enamel. crown of an impacted
location. The biological behaviors of Some lesions tooth. An opaque focus
these lesions are also similar. Both diagnosed as that appears within the
are benign mixed odontogenic ameloblastic fibro- ameloblastic fibro-
tumors composed of neoplastic odontoma are odontoma is due to the
epithelium and mesenchyme with probably developing presence of an
microscopically identical soft tissue odontoma, but the odontoma. This lesion
components. others should not be therefore appears as a
The mandibular molar-ramus area considered as combined lucent-
Figure 6: Ameloblastic Fibroma (left photo) and Ameloblastic Fibro-odontoma (right photo) ©hindawi;
©sciencedirect
ODONTOGENIC TUMORS
DISEASES TREATMENTS/MANAGEMENTS
Ameloblastic Fibroma Because of tumor encapsulation and the general lack of invasive capacity,
and Ameloblastic this lesion is treated through a conservative surgical procedure such as
Fibro-odontoma curettage or excision. Recurrences have been documented, but they are
uncommon.
A rare malignant counterpart known as ameloblastic fibrosarcoma has been
documented as arising in the jaws de novo or from preexisting or recurrent
ameloblastic fibroma. In this lesion, the mesenchymal component has the
appearance of a fibrosarcoma, and the epithelial component appears as it
Case Report
This was a case report of a 16-year-old male patient who reported to the Department of Oral Medicine,
GDC, Ahmedabad with the chief complaint of swelling and mild pain in the right side of the jaw since 6
months, with a history of extraction of 46 because of pain before 6 months in a private dental clinic.
On clinical examination, there was diffuse bony hard swelling present in the right body of mandible with
normal overlying skin. Intra-orally, there was diffuse bony hard swelling in 46 region with normal
overlying mucosa and expanded buccal and lingual cortical plates. Adjacent teeth were immobile and
undisplaced.
Radiological examination revealed a well-defined round radiopacity with radiolucent rim in the right
body of mandible. Mandibular occlusal radiograph revealed expansion of buccal and lingual cortical
plates. He had pre-extraction intraoral periapical radiography (IOPA) radiograph of 46 region, which
showed a well-defined radiopacity surrounded by radiolucent rim attached to roots of 46.
Histopathologically it showed a well-circumscribed tumor composed of cementum like tissue
surrounded by a fibrous capsule.
Questions:
1. What is the patient’s condition?
2. Radiographically, what is the most obvious manifestation of this case that lead you to a correct
diagnosis?
● Stop and check your answers against the Key to Corrections found at the end of this Activity
Sheet. Write your score/s on your paper.
C. LESSON WRAP-UP
Activity 6: Thinking about Learning
A. Work Tracker
You are done with this session! Let’s track your progress. Shade the session number you just
completed.
How much does your personal preference for topics and activities affect the quality of your effort and
your output?
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
What is the strategy that you’ve never tried before that you think will help you better understand the
lesson? Describe it.
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
FAQs:
What are the difference between cementifying fibroma and fibrous dysplasia?
The differentiating features between cementifying fibroma and fibrous dysplasia are:
• Cementifying fibroma is round in shape and causes nodular or dome shaped jaw expansion
while fibrous dysplasia is rectangular and causes elongated fusiform expansion.
• The margins are sharply defined in cementifying fibroma while the margins are instinct, blending
with normal bone in fibrous dysplasia.
• Cementifying fibroma has a wide age range from 7–58 years while the mean age in fibrous
dysplasia is 20 years.
• Cementifying fibroma is mostly seen in mandible (70%) while fibrous dysplasia shows marked
predilection for maxilla. (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
KEY TO CORRECTIONS:
Activity 3
Activity 5:
1. D 2. B 3.D 4. A 5. D
_________________
Prepared by:
MIGNONETH GAY P. ESTRERA, DMD
Professor/Clinic Instructor
Southwestern University PHINMA - College of Dentistry