Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dơnload Whitcup and Nussenblatt's Uveitis: Fundamentals and Clinical Practice 5th Edition Scott M. Whitcup MD Full Chapter
Dơnload Whitcup and Nussenblatt's Uveitis: Fundamentals and Clinical Practice 5th Edition Scott M. Whitcup MD Full Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/fundamentals-of-surveying-practice-
exam-5th-edition-george-m-cole/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/clinical-cases-in-uveitis-
differential-diagnosis-and-management-1st-edition-harpal-s-
sandhu/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/bradley-and-daroffs-neurology-in-
clinical-practice-2-volume-set-8th-edition-joseph-jankovic-md/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/fundamentals-of-clinical-
trials-5th-edition-lawrence-m-friedman-curt-d-furberg-david-
demets-david-m-reboussin-christopher-b-granger/
Practice of Clinical Echocardiography Catherine M. Otto
https://ebookmeta.com/product/practice-of-clinical-
echocardiography-catherine-m-otto/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-ultimate-french-review-and-
practice-5th-premium-edition-david-m-stillman/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/stroke-pathophysiology-diagnosis-
and-management-5th-edition-j-p-mohr-ms-md-stroke-pathophysiology-
diagnosis-and-management-5th-edition-j-p-mohr-ms-md/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/fundamentals-of-structural-
analysis-solution-manual-5th-edition-kenneth-m-leet/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/primary-mathematics-3a-hoerst/
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
CHAP. IX.
After the body of the universe, also, many things are generated by
the nature of it. For the concord of similars, and the contrariety of
dissimilars, effect not a few things. Farther still, the assemblage of
many things into the one animal of the universe, and the powers in
the world, whatever the number and quality of them may be, effect,
in short, one thing in wholes and another in parts, on account of the
divided imbecility of parts. Thus, for instance, the friendship, love,
and contention which subsist in energy in the universe, become
passions in the partial natures by which they are participated. Those
things, likewise, that are preestablished in forms and pure reasons in
the nature of wholes, participate of a certain material indigence, and
privation of morphe, in things which subsist according to a part. And
things which are conjoined to each other in wholes are separated in
parts. Hence partible natures, which participate of wholes in
conjunction with matter, degenerate from them in all things, and
also from what is beautiful and perfect. But some parts are
corrupted, in order that wholes may be preserved in a condition
conformable to nature. Sometimes, likewise, parts are compressed
and weighed down, though at the same time wholes remain
impassive to a molestation of this kind.
CHAP. X.
Moreover, you inquire, and at the same time doubt, “how it comes
to pass that the Gods do not hear him who invokes them, if he is
impure from venereal connexions; but, at the same time, they do
not refuse to lead any one to illegal venery.” You have, indeed, a
clear solution of these things from what has been before said; if they
are done contrary to [human] laws, but are effected according to
another order and cause more excellent than laws. Or if it happens
that things of this kind are conformable to the mundane harmony
and friendship, yet produce a conflict in parts through a certain
sympathy. Or if the communication of good, which is beautifully
imparted, is perverted by those that receive it to the contrary.
CHAP. XII.
CHAP. I.
The doubt mentioned by you in the next place, is, as I may say, an
inquiry which is made in common both by the learned and the
unlearned, I mean concerning sacrifices, “what utility or power they
possess in the universe, and with the Gods, and on what account
they are performed, appropriately indeed to the powers who are
honoured by them, but usefully to those by whom the gifts are
offered.” In the same place, also, another objection occurs, viz. “that
the interpreters of prophecies and oracles ought to abstain from
animals, lest the Gods should be polluted by the vapours arising
from them. For this is contrary to the assertion, that the Gods are
especially allured by the vapours of animals.”
CHAP. II.
Nor is that which so greatly disturbs you, and for which you so
strenuously contend, attended with any difficulty, I mean abstinence
from animals,[95] if it is rightly understood. For those who worship
the Gods do not abstain from animals, lest the Gods should be
defiled by the vapours arising from them. For what exhalation from
bodies can approach those who, before any thing material can come
into contact with their power, intangibly amputate matter? Nor is it
the power of the Gods only that abolishes all bodies, and causes them
to vanish, without any approximation to them; but a celestial body,
also, is unmingled with all the material elements;[96] nor does it
receive into itself any thing extraneous, nor impart any portion of
itself to things of a foreign nature. How, therefore, can any terrestrial
vapour, which is not elevated five stadia from the earth before it
again flows down to the earth, either nourish a circulating and
immaterial body, or, in short, produce in it a certain defilement, or
any other passion? For it is acknowledged that an etherial body is
void of all contrariety, is liberated from all mutation, is entirely pure
from the possibility of being transmuted into any thing else, and is
perfectly free from a tendency to, and from the middle, because it is
either without any tendency, or is convolved in a circle. Hence, it is
not possible that bodies, which consist of different powers and
motions, which are all-variously changed, and are moved either
upwards or downwards, should have any communion of nature or
power with celestial bodies, or that any exhalation of the former
should be mingled with the latter. As the former, therefore, are
entirely separated from the latter, they will not effect any thing in
them. For celestial bodies being unbegotten, are not capable of
receiving any mutation from generated natures. How, therefore, can
the Gods be defiled by such like vapours, who suddenly, as I may say,
at one stroke, amputate the vapours ascending from all matter and
material bodies?
This, therefore, it is not fit to suspect of the Gods [viz. that they
can be defiled by vapours]; but it is much more requisite to think
that things of this kind are foreign to us and to our nature. For things
which are divided, and also material and kindred natures, are able to
have a certain communion with each other in acting and suffering;
but things which are essentially different, and such as are entirely
transcendent, and which employ other natures and powers, these
cannot act on or receive any thing from each other. The defilement,
therefore, produced by material natures, falls on things which are
detained by a material body; and from these it is necessary those
should be purified who are capable of being defiled by matter. But
how can those beings be defiled by material essences who neither
have a divisible nature nor possess the power of receiving in
themselves the passions of matter? How, likewise, can divinity, who
has nothing in common with us, in consequence of antecedently
existing superior to human imbecility, be polluted by my passions, or
by those of any other man?
Neither of these, therefore, at all pertains to the Gods; neither our
being filled with material bodies; (for there is nothing, in short, of
this kind with them, nor are they defiled by our stains, since they are
entirely pure and incorruptible), nor if there are certain material
vapours of bodies which are emitted about the earth; for these
vapours are most remote from the essence and power of the Gods.
Hence the whole hypothesis of contrariety is subverted if no part of it
pertains to the Gods. For how, in short, can that which is not possess
in itself a certain contest [with any thing]? You in vain, therefore,
suspect things of this kind to be absurd, and you adduce doubts
unworthy of the Gods, since they cannot be reasonably applied even
to good men. For no man who possesses intellect, and is free from
passion, would ever permit himself to be allured by the exhalation of
vapours, and much less would any one of the beings more excellent
than man suffer himself to be thus allured. These things, however,
will be discussed shortly after. But now, since this contrariety is,
through many solutions, subverted, we shall here finish what we
have to say about the first doubt.
CHAP. V.
But the greatest thing in sacrifices, viz. their efficacious power, and
why especially they are so very beneficial that without them we are
neither liberated from pestilence, nor famine, nor sterility of fruits,
nor obtain seasonable showers of rain, nor things of much greater
consequence than these, I mean such as contribute to the
purification of the soul, or an emancipation from generation; these
are not at all indicated by such modes of sacrifices as you adduce.
Hence no one can justly approve of them, because they assign a
cause of the works performed in sacrifices unadapted to their dignity.
And if some one should approve of them it will be only in a
secondary way, and as suspended from primary, more ancient, and
venerable causes.
CHAP. VII.