Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lec 01
Lec 01
Lec 01
Sobolev spaces
Rainer Mandel, Zois Moitier
Karlsruhe, 13.04.2021
Lecture+Tutorials: 3+1
Lecture: myself+notes (Tue 12am),
Tutorials: Zois Moitier (Thu 6pm)
Tutorials: Discussions, explanations, exercise sheets
Prerequisits: Calculus, bit of Functional analysis
Aim: Basics of Sobolev Spaces and applications to PDEs
Lecture+Tutorials: 3+1
Lecture: myself+notes (Tue 12am),
Tutorials: Zois Moitier (Thu 6pm)
Tutorials: Discussions, explanations, exercise sheets
Prerequisits: Calculus, bit of Functional analysis
Aim: Basics of Sobolev Spaces and applications to PDEs
Lecture+Tutorials: 3+1
Lecture: myself+notes (Tue 12am),
Tutorials: Zois Moitier (Thu 6pm)
Tutorials: Discussions, explanations, exercise sheets
Prerequisits: Calculus, bit of Functional analysis
Aim: Basics of Sobolev Spaces and applications to PDEs
Lecture+Tutorials: 3+1
Lecture: myself+notes (Tue 12am),
Tutorials: Zois Moitier (Thu 6pm)
Tutorials: Discussions, explanations, exercise sheets
Prerequisits: Calculus, bit of Functional analysis
Aim: Basics of Sobolev Spaces and applications to PDEs
Lecture+Tutorials: 3+1
Lecture: myself+notes (Tue 12am),
Tutorials: Zois Moitier (Thu 6pm)
Tutorials: Discussions, explanations, exercise sheets
Prerequisits: Calculus, bit of Functional analysis
Aim: Basics of Sobolev Spaces and applications to PDEs
Lecture+Tutorials: 3+1
Lecture: myself+notes (Tue 12am),
Tutorials: Zois Moitier (Thu 6pm)
Tutorials: Discussions, explanations, exercise sheets
Prerequisits: Calculus, bit of Functional analysis
Aim: Basics of Sobolev Spaces and applications to PDEs
Content:
(1) (1L) Introduction and Preliminaries
(2) (2L) Weak derivatives and Sobolev spaces
(3) (2L) Lax-Milgram Theorem and Riesz’ representation Theorem
(4) (2L) Extension Theorem, Sobolev’s Embedding Theorem
(5) (2L) The Rellich-Kondrachov Theorem
(6) (1L) Poincaré’s Inequality
(7) (2L) Trace Theorem
(8) . . .
Example (p = 2):
W 1,2 (Ω) = u ∈ L2 (Ω) : ∂i u ∈ L2 (Ω) ∀i ∈ {1, . . . , N}
W 1,2 (Ω) = u ∈ L2 (Ω) : ∂i u ∈ L2 (Ω) ∀i ∈ {1, . . . , N}
W 1,2 (Ω) = u ∈ L2 (Ω) : ∂i u ∈ L2 (Ω) ∀i ∈ {1, . . . , N}
W 1,2 (Ω) = u ∈ L2 (Ω) : ∂i u ∈ L2 (Ω) ∀i ∈ {1, . . . , N}
W 1,2 (Ω) = u ∈ L2 (Ω) : ∂i u ∈ L2 (Ω) ∀i ∈ {1, . . . , N}
W 1,2 (Ω) = u ∈ L2 (Ω) : ∂i u ∈ L2 (Ω) ∀i ∈ {1, . . . , N}
W 1,2 (Ω) = u ∈ L2 (Ω) : ∂i u ∈ L2 (Ω) ∀i ∈ {1, . . . , N}
γu = g.
γu = g.
This problem can be solved with the aid of Functional Analysis,
sometimes even uniquely.
Aim:
kTxkY
kT k := kT kX →Y = sup < ∞.
x,0 kxkX
kTxkY
kT k := kT kX →Y = sup < ∞.
x,0 kxkX
where ∂Ω = M
S
i=1 Ui . Here, the Ui ’s are disjoint neighbourhoods
as above with ψi ∈ C m,α (RN−1 ; R).
Z
g dσUi
∂Ω∩Ui
Z q
:= g(x 0 , ψi (x 0 )) 1 + |∇ψi (x 0 )|2 dx 0 .
{x 0 ∈RN−1 :(x 0 ,ψi (x 0 ))∈Ui }
NB: If you are not satisfied with Thu 6pm-8pm, please participate in
the Doodle poll.