Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ashok Taru Mallick Consumer Petition
Ashok Taru Mallick Consumer Petition
Ashok Taru Mallick Consumer Petition
Be that as it may, the fact remains that the said ill-fated vehicle met
with an accident on the road in the North-east direction about 24 kms
from Mekhliganj Police Station. Yet even after providing the documents
for substantiating the claim, the insurance company rejected the claim
of the complainant. The closure of the claim has caused the
complainant severe loss.
MEMO OF PARTIES
ALSO AVAILABLE AT
Registered office at ‘Natraj, 301, Junction of Western Express
Highway & Andheri – Kurla Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai -
400069
ALSO AVAILABLE AT
Corporate office at Sadhana House, 2 nd Floor, 570, P.B. Marg,
Behind Mahindra Towers, Worli, Mumbai – 400018
BEFORE THE LEARNED DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT SILIGURI
Consumer Case No. _________ of 2024
…. Opposite Party
2. That the Opposite Party (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as
the ‘O.P.’) is a reputed insurance company having its branch office and
registered office at the aforementioned addresses as mentioned in the
cause title of the complaint.
3. That the Performa Opposite Party) hereinafter for the sake of brevity
referred to as the ‘P.O.P.’) is a reputed Finance company having its
branch office and registered office at the aforementioned addresses as
mentioned in the cause title of the complaint.
PARTICULARS OF GRIEVANCES
4. That the Complainant is the registered owner of one Motor Car (Maruti
Suzuki WagonR VXI 1.0L) bearing Registration No. WB74BA8731,
Chassis No. MA3JMT31SKJ226961, Engine No. K10BN8301119.
6. That the complainant purchased the said vehicle on loan from P.O.P.
vide Loan Agreement bearing Agreement No. 6678930 dated 19.12.2019
7. That the complainant had taken the said policy from the O.P. Insurance
Company with an expectation that at the time of any accident or any
untoward incident, the O.P. Insurance Company will provide financial
assistance to the complainant in lieu of the said insurance policy.
13. That the vehicle of the complainant was assessed by Sevoke Motors Pvt.
Ltd. and declared to have suffered total loss.
Photocopy of Job Slip issued by Sevoke Motors Pvt. Ltd.
dated 10.06.2020 is annexed herewith and marked as
“Annexure – I”
14. That the complainant after being discharged wrote a letter to the Claims
Manager of the O.P. Insurance Company stating and clarifying the
matter and requesting the O.P. to disburse the claim.
Photocopy of the said letter sent by Complainant to O.P. is
annexed herewith and marked as “Annexure – J”
15. That the complainant received a final reminder letter from the O.P.
requesting the complainant to submit Driver ML Report by 22.01.2021.
Whereas, due to circumstances beyond the control of the complainant,
he was unable to procure the ML report.
Photocopy of the final reminder letter sent by O.P. to the
Complainant is annexed herewith and marked as
“Annexure – K”
16. That on 29.01.2021 the O.P. sent a claim closure letter stating “Rejected
due to documents pending”.
Photocopy of the Claim Closure Letter sent by O.P. to the
Complainant is annexed herewith and marked as
“Annexure – L”
17. That after the claim was rejected by the O.P. Insurance Company the
complainant suffered a major financial hardship and the result of which
the complainant was unable to pay the EMI of the said vehicle to the
P.O.P. Finance Company.
18. That a letter dated 07.03.2022 was sent by the P.O.P. Finance Company
recalling the loan agreement with the complainant due to the
irregularity and default in payment of EMI by the complainant. The
complainant was directed to pay a hefty sum of Rs. 5,67,266/- (Rupees
Five Lakhs Sixty Seven Thousand Two Hundred and Sixty Six) only and
if the complainant failed to pay the said amount the P.O.P. threatened
to initiate appropriate legal against the complainant.
Photocopy of the letter dated 07.03.2022 from P.O.P. is
annexed herewith and marked as “Annexure – M”
19. That the complainant received a notice dated 01.03.2023 from Udit
Sharma and Associates, legal representative of P.O.P. Finance
Company, invoking Arbitration Proceedings.
Photocopy of the notice from Udit Sharma and Associates is
annexed herewith and marked as “Annexure – N”
20. That it is relevant to mention here that at the time of making the claim
the complainant had provided all the relevant documents possible to the
O.P. Company as per their requisition on each and every occasion the
complainant has clarified all their queries for the settlement of the
claim.
21. That it is pertinent to mention here that the complainant could not
provide the O.P. Insurance Company with the Driver M.L. Report as he
could not procure it himself.
22. That it is pertinent to mention here that even after receipt of all
necessary and relevant documents and clarifications which were
required by the O.P. Insurance Company for the processing of the claim,
the O.P. Insurance company deliberately rejected the claim on the
ground that documents were pending. This is very contradictory to the
law of land and also amounts to utter deficiency of service and unfair
trade practice on the part of the Opposite Party. The Opposite party
does not have the right to refuse a claim arbitrarily without giving valid
legal reason.
24. That the complainant has suffered immense financial loss due to
rejection of the claim of the complainant. The complainant had taken
the said insurance policy from the opposite party and paid the premium
of the same with an anticipation that in the event of exigencies the
opposite party would render their assistance by providing adequate
compensation but the opposite party have miserably failed and
neglected to render their services to the complainant and due to their
deficiency in service the complainant is suffering a huge monetary loss.
25. That your complainant is unable to pay the Loan amount to the P.O.P.
Finance company and is getting notices from P.O.P. and its legal
representative because of the deficiency in rendering of service by the
Insurance Company and as the insurance company rejected the claim
unlawfully, your complainant is suffering from irreparable losses at all
fronts.
26. That the because of the latches of the Insurance Company and their
careless behavior towards your complainant when they should have
ensured the basic requirement of their consumer have significantly been
deficient, essentially establishing their deficiency has cost your
Complainant the loss of valuable time and resources.
CAUSE OF ACTION
27. That the cause of action arose on 16.05.2020 when the complainant
met with an accident while driving the said vehicle, on various dates on
which communications were made both from the complainant and the
O.P., on 29.01.2021 the O.P. have rejected the claim of the complainant,
on 07.03.2022 when the P.O.P. recalled the loan agreement between the
P.O.P. and complainant, and finally on 01.03.2023 when the legal
representative of P.O.P. sent a notice invoking the arbitration
proceedings and the cause of action is still continuing because O.P. has
not released the claim of the complainant.
29. That the Complainant has suffered mental agony, monetary losses and
damages due to unfair trade practices and deficiency in service on the
part of the O.P. and that the complainant is entitled to receive the
insured amount, compensation for the losses suffered by the
complainant, compensation for mental pain, agony and harassment
suffered by the complainant, legal and litigation costs, interest on the
total amount due.
30. That the grievance/dispute of the complainant is well within the
jurisdiction of this Ld. Commission and the O.P. also has office within
the jurisdiction of this Ld. Commission.
31. That the court fees have been paid accordingly and deficit court fees if
found will be paid accordingly.
32. That the complainant craves the leave of this Ld. Commission to amend
any of the averments of this complaint.
33. That the complainant has not filed any suit, complaint in any other
Courts of Law, Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Hon’ble
Tribunals or Hon’ble Commissions in India under the same cause of
action.
34. That under the above circumstances the complainant prays that Your
Honour would be graciously be pleased to enquire into the matter for
protection of the consumer’s interest and pass order/s in favour of the
complainant and direct:-
B) Direct the Opposite party to pay the storage fee for the damaged
vehicle being compounded in the service center from 10.06.2020
@ Rs. 400/- (Rupees Four Hundred) only per day till the date of
payment;
H) And other relief/relieves as Your Honour may deem fit and proper
And for this act of kindness Your Complainant as in duty bound shall
ever pray.
AFFIDAVIT
_____________________________
Signature of the declarant
Identified by me:
Advocate
BEFORE THE LEARNED DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT SILIGURI
Consumer Case No. _________ of 2024
KAMLESH RAY
…. Complainant
-Versus-
SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
…. Opposite Party