MEDICAL LAW &

ETHICS
ANDI ERLINA
MAGISTER ADMINISTRASI RUMAH SAKIT

UNIVERSITAS YARSI
 PRODI MAGISTER ADMINISTRASI RUMAH SAKIT
1. MATA KULIAH : HUKUM & ETIKA KESEHATAN
2. SEMESTER : I (Satu)
3. PJ. MATA KULIAH : dr. Andi Erlina, MARS, MH, CMC
4. UJIAN : Akhir Semester
5. BENTUK UJIAN : Tugas Individu
6. WAKTU PENGERJAAN : 1 (satu) minggu,
5 – 12 Januari 2024
A. JELASKAN TUJUAN HUKUM !

B. JELASKAN TUJUAN DAN MANFAAT HUKUM

KESEHATAN UNTUK :
B1. ORGANISASI
B2. PASIEN & KELUARGA
B3. PELAYANAN KESEHATAN
 MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE VS
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
C. JELASKAN PERBEDAAN
INSPANNING VERBINTENIS &
A. JELASKAN RESULTAAT VERBINTENIS,
PERBEDAANNYA ! BERIKAN CONTOHNYA
MASING-MASING !
B. BERIKAN MASING-MASING
CONTOH & D. SEBUTKAN 5 HAL POKOK
PENJELASANNYA / REGULASI MEDIASI DALAM
ARGUMENTASINYA ! PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA
MEDIK DI RS !
 MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE VS
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
D. CASE STUDY
 In October 2020, Mrs T contacted her GP
with an episode of post-menopausal
bleeding. She was referred under the 'two
week wait' suspected cancer pathway to
Hospital.
 Mrs T underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy in
November 2020, which revealed no
apparent sign of malignancy, but which
was reported that excessive thickening of
the endometrial tissue, known as uterine
hyperplasia, was 'difficult to exclude' but
fell short of making a diagnosis.
 Mrs T was reviewed in clinic by a Consultant
Obstetrician who informed her that she had
atypical endometrial hyperplasia, a
gynecological condition that presents a
significant risk of uterine cancer, advised
that she should undergo a complete
hysterectomy, to include removal of her
ovaries, since one in two patients diagnosed
with this condition already have cancer.
 No other treatment options were offered and
the Consultant booked her in for surgery the
same day. The information provided during the
appointment, together with the urgency of the
Obstetrician's recommendations, led Mrs T to
believe she already had cancer, and she
agreed to surgery, as she was fearful and
distressed by his advice.
 Mrs T underwent a laparoscopic hysterectomy in December 2020. She had to attend
hospital alone during the Covid-19 pandemic and was placed on a mixed ward which left
her feeling vulnerable, particularly as she had a chronic underlying health condition.
Following the surgery, Mrs T was in significant pain and relied on her husband to look
after her. Her recovery was further complicated by a wound infection at the operation site.
 Histopathology from the hysterectomy in late December 2020 reported as showing that
there was no evidence of cancer cells present in the tissue that had been removed
during the operation.

 The Trust reviewed the previous biopsy and noted that there was no evidence of atypical
thickening of the womb lining and that Mrs T had been advised to undergo unnecessary
surgery.

 Two weeks after her surgery, Mrs T received a phone call from the hospital requesting her
urgent attendance to see the Consultant. She was not provided with a reason for the
appointment and feared the worst, that the cancer was more advanced than previously
thought.
 In January 2021, the Consultant met with Mrs
T under the Trust's duty of candour. He
informed her that he had misread the first
histopathology report, she had never been
at increased risk of cancer and that the
hysterectomy procedure had been
unnecessary. He acknowledged that Mrs T LAKUKAN REVIEW /
should have been offered alternative CRITICAL ANALYSIS
treatment such as an IUD (coil) which may TERHADAP KASUS
TERSEBUT
well have resolved her symptoms.
BERDASARKAN
 Because of the unnecessary hysterectomy, PERATURAN
Mrs T has experienced distress and anxiety PERUNDANGAN TERKAIT
as well as a range of unpleasant and DALAM RUANG LINGKUP
uncomfortable side effects, including an HUKUM KESEHATAN !
exacerbation of symptoms associated with
her underlying condition. Mrs T suffered
avoidable scarring of the lower abdomen,
psychological injury and sexual dysfunction.
 MEDICAL & A. JELASKAN MAKSUD &
HOSPITAL ETHICS TUJUAN ETIKA KESEHATAN !
B. JELASKAN & BERIKAN
CONTOH PILAR-PILAR
DALAM ETIKA PELAYANAN
KESEHATAN (MEDICAL
ETHICS) DAN TINJAUANNYA
DALAM PERSPEKTIF ISLAM !
C. SEBUTKAN DAN JELASKAN 4
NILAI RS SYARIAH DALAM
KODE ETIK RS SYARIAH !
 INFORMED CONSENT

A. JELASKAN DEFINISI
INFORMED CONSENT (IC)
SESUAI PERATURAN C. SIAPA SAJA YANG BERHAK
PERUNDANGAN YANG MENANDATANGANI IC !
BERLAKU !
D. SEBUTKAN 3 KONDISI
B. SEBUTKAN HAL YANG HARUS
PENGECUALIAN TIDAK
ADA DALAM IC !
DIPERLUKANNYA IC !
 HOSPITAL
REGULATION
UU KESEHATAN 17/2023
C. HAK & KEWAJIBAN
A. DEFINISI &
RUMAH SAKIT
RUANG LINGKUP
JELASKAN DEFINISI & SEBUTKAN !
RUANG LINGKUP
PELAYANAN RUMAH SAKIT !
D. HAK & KEWAJIBAN
B. TANGGUNG JAWAB PASIEN
JELASKAN TANGGUNG
SEBUTKAN !
JAWAB PEMILIK &
PIMPINAN RUMAH SAKIT !
 HUKUM & ETIKA RUMAH SAKIT

A. JELASKAN CODE OF CONDUCT RUMAH SAKIT !

B. SEBUTKAN TUGAS & FUNGSI KOMITE ETIK RUMAH

SAKIT !

C. SEBUTKAN MIN. 5 PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK

KEDOKTERAN !
 HUKUM
ADMINISTRASI SEBUTKAN 3 PERATURAN
PERUNDANGAN TENTANG :
RUMAH SAKIT A. ORGANISASI RUMAH SAKIT
B. TENAGA MEDIS
C. SDM RUMAH SAKIT
D. SARANA PRASARANA
RUMAH SAKIT
E. ALAT KESEHATAN
F. LINGKUNGAN RUMAH SAKIT
 HUKUM OBAT
& MAKANAN
JELASKAN TANGUNG JAWAB
PEMERINTAH TERHADAP
‫ض َحل اًل َط ِيبا ۖا َّو َْل‬ ِ ‫اس ُكلُ ْوا ِم َّما ِفى ْاْلَ ْر‬ ُ َّ‫ٰٓياَيُّ َها الن‬
OBAT & MAKANAN !

‫۝‬ ١ ‫َُُو ُّم ِب ْين‬ َ ْْ ‫ش ْيط ِۗ ِن اِنَّٗ لَ ُك‬

َّ ‫ت ال‬
ِ ‫طو‬ُ ‫تَت َّ ِبعُ ْوا ُخ‬ JELASKAN PERATURAN
Wahai manusia, makanlah sebagian (makanan) di bumi yang halal PERUNDANGAN TENTANG ZAT
lagi baik dan janganlah mengikuti langkah-langkah setan.
Sesungguhnya ia bagimu merupakan musuh yang nyata. ADIKTIF, TERUTAMA
Al-Baqarah Ayat 168 TEMBAKAU !

JELASKAN REGULASI TENTANG

OBAT TRADISIONAL !

JELASKAN REGULASI PELAYANAN

FARMASI DI RUMAH SAKIT DALAM
MENJAMIN MUTU &
KESELAMATAN PASIEN !
Important Left
in Mind
A. SEBUTKAN 3 MANFAAT
YANG BPK/IBU DAPATKAN
DALAM PEMBELAJRAN
MATA KULIAH HUKUM &
ETIKA KESEHATAN
B. PERUBAHAN INSIGHT /
PERSPEKTIF APA YANG
DIPEROLEH SETELAH
SELESAINYA MATA KULIAH
HUKUM & ETIKA
KESEHATAN ?