Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Morgan Stanley RFP - Final
Morgan Stanley RFP - Final
Morgan Stanley RFP - Final
A proven partner
Richard Myers
Head of IFM, Hong Kong
+852 9160 7522
richard.myers@ap.jll.com
Cover Letter
Part 1 Declaration
Part 2 Format of Response
Part 3 General Requirement
Part 4 Alternative Proposal
Appendix A Company Information
Appendix B Terms and Conditions Compliance
Appendix C Price Schedule
Supporting Documents
Attachment A Service Requirement & Service Level.
Attachment B Savings & Innovation.xls
Attachment C Gantt Chart
Attachment C2 Gantt Chart for Alternative Proposal
Attachment D Certificate of Verification of JLL Global general liability.pdf
Attachment E Annual Reports
Table of Contents
Cover Letter
Part 1 – Declaration
Part 2 – Format of Response
Executive Summary
1
Regional Unmatched regional coverage – Leveraging our regional infrastructure, our
& Local team is able to provide consistent quality services as one firm, one culture,
sharing the common goals and objectives of Morgan Stanley. The regional
Infrastructure –
scale will allow Jones Lang LaSalle to provide benefits like partial funding of a
Integrated regional account director and full absorption of OneView Financials platform,
Operations JD Edwards, to support your business. This is an investment by Jones Lang
LaSalle to demonstrate that we are working in partnership.
Operational infrastructure - Taking comfort in Jones Lang LaSalle’s robust
operational and support services infrastructure including HR, Finance and I.T.,
Morgan Stanley can leverage our extensive facilities infrastructure and teams,
both on the ground and in our head offices, to deliver on key goals and
regional consistency.
Performance management culture – We have complete familiarity with KPI /
SLA driven contracts, meaning for Morgan Stanley that our teams’
compensation is directly tied to the results we deliver through our unique
IPMP performance system. Our success is your success.
Thought leadership – Our teams actively participate and present at industry
forums, generate research White Papers, benchmarking studies and more -
our senior leadership team is widely acknowledged in facilities management
forums such as IFMA (HK Chapter) where the current President and Vice
President are Jones Lang LaSalle colleagues, and in Australia where Chris
Hunt is a serving member of the FMAA Board of Directors.
2
risk for non-performance under a three-country award and our alternate
proposal.
Benefit from a Our integrated technology platform - OneView by Jones Lang LaSalle for
truly integrated all aspects of service delivery
technology Better asset and maintenance platform – We have taken feedback from
platform Morgan Stanley and we would like to introduce 360Facility to replace Maximo
as the Morgan Stanley’s regional asset and maintenance platform. We will
also transition the Australian operations from Maximo to 360Facility at no cost
to Morgan Stanley.
Centralised 24/7 helpdesk - Morgan Stanley can leverage our existing
regional helpdesk centres based in India and China with English, Mandarin,
Cantonese, and Hindi language support, as an alternate to it being based in
Hong Kong. This potentially results in a potential gross save of some
US$130,000.
Effectively manage budgets through OneView Financials – Through the
implementation of JD Edwards, a standard accounting approach allows teams
to accurately benchmark costs to a high level of detail. We will introduce JD
Edwards with no cost to Morgan Stanley as part of the exercise of moving
from agent to principal.
Integrated data reporting solution - the full benefit of synthesizing a
complete, harmonious view of multi-countries’ data at a portfolio,
geographical, site or business unit level. This package will be added to our
proposed alternate technology solution at minimal cost to Morgan Stanley.
3
training that is tailored to our clients’ needs to ensure that every employee has the
skills needed to deliver the level of service required by Jones Lang LaSalle and
expected of Morgan Stanley. Many of our senior employees on the Morgan Stanley
account have gone through many of these accredited courses.
“For the past 8 years Jones Lang LaSalle has invested to build a facilities
management capability unrivalled across Asia Pacific. Today, we have a
platform built and operating across the region that can service the needs of
Morgan Stanley today and into the future. My personal commitment to Morgan
Stanley is to allow you to leverage our facilities platform to drive down costs
whilst maintaining best-in-class facilities at standards commensurate with your
business expectations.”
Jordi Martin
Managing Director, Integrated Facilities Management
Asia Pacific
4
Section 1 -
Introduction
This is not an isolated assignment for Jones Lang LaSalle – it is an opportunity for
us to further build on our long-term commitment to Morgan Stanley across Asia
Pacific. Morgan Stanley and Jones Lang LaSalle enjoy a successful relationship in
parts of the Asia Pacific region and we look forward to leveraging this knowledge
to include China, bringing in a platform and understanding that creates value and
reduces risk to Morgan Stanley. For our existing markets of Australia and Hong
Kong, we have proposed changes to our account management structure as well as
technology platform to take on board the feedback we have received from Morgan
Stanley as part of our existing partnership.
As the only wholly-owned, global integrated real estate firm, Jones Lang LaSalle
provides a unique proven platform to Morgan Stanley that is difficult for our
competitors to match.
Section 1- 1
Jones Lang LaSalle clearly understands the intent of this request for proposal.
Morgan Stanley is looking at the service provider to take ownership, demonstrate
leadership, standardize service levels and achieve cost efficiencies.
Through our existing partnership in Australia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, the
Philippines, Singapore and Taiwan and recent new partnership in India, our
learnings’ gained in these countries will help to ensure standardized and consistent
service levels are provided across the region. If we are awarded China, we would
transfer knowledge and learnings from other locations and Morgan Stanley can
leverage on our banking experience of 6.7 million square feet in China.
This standardization and consistency will manifest itself in the provision of
services that allows Morgan Stanley to step away from the day-to-day operational
activities, enabling its management team to focus on the supervision of the service
provider and setting the longer term strategies to address the changing business
needs of Morgan Stanley. In our delivery model, this will be the primary
responsibility of our Account Manager or Regional Account Director.
A Measure of Success
Morgan Stanley will measure the success of our relationship by our ability to meet
or exceed expectations, through regular formal meetings, results from agreed
SLA’s and KPI’s, ensuring we are held accountable through the provisions in the
MSA and Task Orders at all times.
Jones Lang LaSalle will comply with the new service levels and key performance
indicators to meet or exceed the required benchmark of acceptance, stated in the
MSA as 85%. We understand fully that failure to meet these levels will have
financial ramifications through the Fee at Risk element.
Whilst the KPI’s will be reported monthly, an evaluation of our services will also
be reviewed on a quarterly basis (Quartely Business Reviews - QBRs) and annual
basis (Annual Contract Survey - ACS) as they are in Hong Kong and Australia
today.
Management staff involved in delivery to Morgan Stanley will be measured on the
level of satisfaction and KPIs as driven by the contract and formally documented
through their Individual Performance Management Plans (IPMP). Key account
requirements, objectives or initiatives are brought in to the individuals IPMP, so
they can be measured against the success of meeting them. The teams in Hong
Kong and Australia today are focused on key Morgan Stanley objectives, which sit
in their IPMP, so there is an alignment of account needs’ and financial reward.
These results have been shared in the past and this practice is set to continue. One
such key objective that will fall in to staffs’ IPMP for 2011 will be the successful
implementation of the Morgan Stanley Account Plan, a regional initiative to
drive further value in to the account.
Section 1- 2
Through listening to Morgan Stanley’s needs and sharing practices learnt from
other locations we manage for Morgan Stanley, we were awarded the contract
for India.
Successful re-award of the contracts for Singapore and Taiwan.
Australia - we have successfully integrated the Jones Lang LaSalle and
Morgan Stanley business continuity plans ensuring a seamless coordinated
approach. We intend to improve upon this by further integration of Jones Lang
LaSalle procedures such as Tenancy reopening check list (Created by JLL) to
be incorporated into Morgan Stanley regional BCP.
Hong Kong - In 2008 we successfully migrated the Morgan Stanley offices
from Central to your new premises at the International Commerce Centre. As
part of this we also took the lead in closing over the many snagging issues.
In addition, as part of Morgan Stanley’s Environmental Programme, we have
managed the implementation of several initiatives in the region to assist the
Asia offices in achieving the firm’s global energy reduction targets. Initiatives
were put in place realizing annual reductions of almost 1.3 million kWh.
Singapore - Through the review of vendor contracts and operational processes
in, we have realised a savings of some US$65,000 in the last 24 months.
Taiwan – We have implemented a few initiatives which have resulted in
energy savings from lighting and service levels improvement. Take for
instance, improved indoor air quality by free installation of UV ray sterilizer on
the AHU at the occupied floors by BMO per request. The improvement of air
quality was certified by the examination before and after installation
Section 1- 3
In addition to the current management team we have today in Hong Kong and
Australia and have proposed for China, we have also identified an experienced and
capable Account Manager. Your Account Manager, Louie Liu, a seasoned
professional, will be supported by the existing core teams in Hong Kong and
Australia and the new team in China to deliver consistency and standardization
across the three locations.
Louie would take the responsibility for initiating and facilitating review meetings
on a monthly, quarterly and annual basis, looking outside the account to bring in
good practices from other similar accounts managed by Jones Lang LaSalle and be
ultimately accountable for the overall performance of the contract with Morgan
Stanley, whilst taking on a hands-on approach to understanding your strategy and
overall direction.
In our alternate proposal, we propose to upgrade the three-Country Account
Manager role to a much more senior (Regional Account Director) role with similar
experience of managing regional operations for a financial institution, if Morgan
Stanley see the benefits. We have identified the senior candidate, Alex Perkins and
presented his credentials under Part 4 Alternate Proposal. We propose this at no
additional cost to Morgan Stanley.
The proposed alternate model will ensure greater ownership which will result in
deeper partnership with us, greater regionalization which in effect will lead to
further consistency, quicker issue resolution and ownership and delivery of
programs at a regional level and commitment on savings from third party vendor
contracts which will be owned and managed by the Regional Account Director.
Project “Harmonize
Regional Account Management Plan Set the scene and outline how we expect to deliver
services to clients by providing specific actions and
milestones
Monthly Meetings (with Client and Vendors) To ensure consistent format is followed
Annual FM Planner A working plan incorporating site specific critical
Section 1- 4
The Tools Objectives
dates (eg key contracts renewals, major events)
Savings Tracker Standard template established for tracking cost
reduction initiatives and results
Management Dashboard Tracker to record key operating issues, innovations
and initiatives
Critical Environment Management review Audit discipline to ensure critical space and
equipment are supported by rigorous management
Scorecard
CEM C/R
Ops AIDE
Initiatives
We will continue the work under Project Harmonize in 2011 and beyond. This
marries well with the initiatives in the Morgan Stanley Account Plan. In the past
we have rolled out a consistent Monthly Management Report and held regular
QBR’s. These can be in future be managed, monitored and reported by the
proposed Regional Account Director.
Section 1- 5
Moving from Agent to Principal
We appreciate the requirement of Morgan Stanley to go from Jones Lang LaSalle
serving as an ‘agent’ to principal for key contracts. We are well placed to manage
this through our Supply Chain Management (SCM) team which sits as part of our
best practice group – Engineering & Operations Solutions. We are some way
down the track with this exercise in Singapore, and are commencing a similar
exercise in Taiwan.
Our vendor assessment process gives adequate importance to the vendor’s
reputation in providing quality resources and contract agreements are based on
extensive works carried out in the area of procurement by Jones Lang LaSalle with
documents covering key clauses to ensure good conduct of the contractors. These
are reviewed periodically to ensure contracts we use keep up with market practices
to ensure that clients and Jones Lang LaSalle’s interest are aligned.
We will agree with Morgan Stanley on the contracts that are to transfer to principal
and the timing of this exercise, agreeing and meeting expectations. These efforts
in migrating will be driven from head office and regional resources so as not to
impact the on-site teams’ daily operations.
Section 1- 6
Section 2 -
Delivery Approach
2.2 General
Transition. Set the right foundation to disseminate policies, processes, tools and
reporting requirements across the region. We will work with you during transition
for China and also leverage on our existing knowledge of Morgan Stanley in
Australia and Hong Kong
Section 2 - 1
This program is designed to audit accounts and solicit best practices that can be
applied elsewhere. Teams of senior-level practice leaders conduct reviews each
year in order to identify innovations, capture issues applicable across our client
base and accelerate sharing of new ideas and practices. The program will allow
Morgan Stanley to reap the benefits of other corporate clients such as Procter &
Gamble, IBM, Nortel, ANZ, Sun, Deutsche Bank, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs and
Intel. In 2010, we have performed this audit for all the Morgan Stanley locations in
Australia and Hong Kong
Section 2 - 2
2.3 Compliance to Service Requirement
Through our close understanding of your operations and having undertaken a
detailed study of your requirements, especially in terms of the technical
documentation, in addition to feedback from you, we have included a dedicated
regional engineer within our structure who will focus on service delivery as
defined in the scope document provided to us. There will also be focus on
consistent service levels and best practices at all sites.
Section 2 - 3
Guiding Principles
It is important for a successful partnership that both Morgan Stanley and Jones
Lang LaSalle objectives are fully aligned.
Morgan Stanley’s business and outsourcing objectives for the portfolio need to be
communicated to the Jones Lang LaSalle team so that we are clear as to the key
drivers and what objectives Morgan Stanley need to achieve. These objectives are
then translated into goals for the account based team and become part of the
Account Plan for the facilities management team.
The use of Key Performance Indicators is key to driving the focus and behaviour
of the team. The key indicators will also be transferred to the 3rd party vendors
working on the account through their service contracts.
Training
Morgan Stanley will continue to benefit from access to facilities management staff
who are up to date on the latest developments and best practice within their area of
expertise. We maintain an extensive curriculum of training and development
courses, which includes modules from our Back to Basics, Real Estate
Management Academy and Engineering Fundamentals programs designed
specifically to meet the business and critical needs of our clients. They are
designed to provide our employees with the tools and skills necessary to achieve
your goals. These programs are currently provided to our onsite staff at Morgan
Stanley’s sites. A typical training schedule is shown below (Training Program for
Hong Kong 2011):
Section 2 - 4
Training Program for Hong Kong
MAIN HEADING Tentative Date Course Duration Attendees Trainer
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ACEDAMY 21-Jan-11 CEM 1 4 Hrs (1400-1800) Engineer / Operation staff Mr. Bill Wong
Contractor SoW 45 Mins (1500-1545)
BACK TO BASICS 18-Feb-11 IT Disaster Recovery Plan 45 Mins (1545-1630) Facility Manager Mr. Bill Wong
Vendor Meetings 45 Mins (1630-1715)
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ACEDAMY Risk Assessment 2 Hrs (1400-1600)
25-Mar-11 Facility Manager, Engineer Mr. Nathan Lau
ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS BMS Fundamentals 2 Hrs (1600 -1800)
ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS 15-Apr-11 CEM Basic / Vendor Inductions 3 Hrs (1500-1800) Operation Staff Mr. Nathan Lau
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ACEDAMY 20-May-11 Fire System Fundamentals 2.5 Hrs (1530-1800) Facility Manager, Engineer Mr. Samson Pang
ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS AC Fundamentals 1.5 Hrs (1500-1630)
17-Jun-11 Risk Reporting 30 Mins (1630-1700) Facility Manager, Engineer Mr. Samuel Ma
BACK TO BASICS
Maintenance Plan 30 Mins (1700-1730)
ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS 22-Jul-11 UPS Fundamentals 2.5 Hrs (1530-1800) SIC / TIC Mr. David Yiu
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ACEDAMY 19-Aug-11 Generator Fundamentals 2 Hrs (1500-1700) Operation Staff Mr. Bill Wong
Premises Inspection 45 Mins (1500-1545)
BACK TO BASICS 23-Sep-11 Risk Reporting 45 Mins (1545-1630) Facility Manager, Engineer Mr. Jarvis Wong
House Rule 45 Mins (1630-1715)
ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS 21-Oct-11 BMS Fundamentals 2 Hrs (1530-1730) Facility Manager, Engineer Mr. Nathan Lau
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ACEDAMY 18-Nov-11 CEM 1 4 Hrs (1400-1800) Operation Staff Mr. Bill Wong
Safe Work Method Statement
Employee Risk Review
BACK TO BASICS 16-Dec-11 3 Hrs (1500-1800) Operation Staff Mr. Jeffrey Yung
MSDS
Lockout Tagout
Section 2 - 5
Resources and Succession Planning
We engage in active succession planning from on-site mid-management levels
upwards to the Account Manager level. Our dedicated human resource teams
working closely with the managers and individual country leads will map out the
succession plans and submit these for management review on a periodic basis. We
also establish Personal Development Plans (PDPs) for our staff. This is an existing
practice on the account now in both Australia and Hong Kong.
Performance Measurement
Our performance management process includes the development of an Individual
Performance Management Plan (IPMP) for each of our staff working on the
account. Our IPMP, which are performance contracts for our staff, sets
performance goals which will be aligned to the objectives of Morgan Stanley to
drive superior business results.
Section 2 - 6
Deliverables and Measurement
Performance measurement and management are fundamental elements of meeting
and exceeding Morgan Stanley’s expectations in delivering real estate services.
Jones Lang LaSalle will implement our standard regional programs (which are
already in place for the countries under our management) such as our Ops-Aide
and CEM Audit.
Jones Lang LaSalle currently provide Facilities Management Services to Morgan
Stanley in Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and recently India. We also
provide remote management to Morgan Stanley sites in Indonesia and Philippines.
We will continue to collaboratively establish measures with Morgan Stanley that
link the goals and objectives of our team directly to your goals and objectives and
set these as part of the account team’s IPMP objectives.
Section 2 - 7
The regional and local teams will interact with the various stakeholders in Morgan
Stanley through these forums. The structure comprises of 3 levels:
Strategic - In the form of a Quarterly/Semi-Annual Business Review. There
will be discussion on the overall contract delivery, strategic direction of the
account, as well as the overall performance metrics.
Operational – A monthly and more formal communication between the Jones
Lang LaSalle team and the Morgan Stanley team. There will be discussion on
operational initiatives, progress against action plans, financial update and
performance measurement.
Tactical - Daily informal discussions between the local Jones Lang LaSalle
team and the Morgan Stanley team. In addition, there will be weekly meetings,
focus on any tactical operational issues - day to day issues and actions.
We will work with Morgan Stanley in creating a Governance dashboard which can
be accessed via OneView Portal. An example is provided below. It will give the
senior team a snapshot on the overall health of the relationship and operations and
will be a key tool for the Governance forums.
Governance Dashboard
Section 2 - 8
approach. Through our strategic planning, performance management and reporting
systems we continuously monitor our performance against mutually established
metrics developed at contract commencement.
Our account management structure provides several levels at which Morgan
Stanley can address performance issues. Jones Lang LaSalle has processes in place
for both preventing and resolving problems, even at off-site.
Hong Kong Current Escalation Process Hong Kong Escalation Process (3 locations award)
Currently, Richard Myers, Head of IFM, Hong Kong has oversight of and regular
updates on activities from the onsite team. Should any problems arise, Stephen
Marr (Chief Engineer) / Phoebe Shum (Facilities Manager) and Morgan Stanley
will escalate issues to Richard Myers (FM lead), and, if required, Richard will
escalate the issue to Bruce Farquharson, EOS Operations Director of North Asia,
for resolution and feedback to Morgan Stanley. And if required the issue will be
further escalated to Ian Bottrell, our Facilities Management Hub lead for North
Asia. We currently do have a similar process in Australia as well.
Section 2 - 9
In the event we are awarded 3 locations, using Hong Kong as an illustration, we
seek to prevent problems by ensuring that the proposed Account Manager, Louie
Lui has oversight of and regular updates on activities from the onsite team. Should
any problems arise, the level and direction of escalation will vary depending on the
scale and impact of the problem. In Hong Kong, Stephen Marr (Chief Engineer) /
Phoebe Shum (Facilities Manager) and Morgan Stanley will escalate issues to
Richard Myers (FM lead), and, if required, Richard will escalate the issue to Bruce
Farquharson, EOS Operations Director of North Asia, for resolution and feedback
to Morgan Stanley. And if required the issue will be further escalated to Ian
Bottrell, our Facilities Management Hub lead for North Asia.
Section 2 - 10
A formal action plan of the ideas learnt and to be adopted is then formalised and
shared with the client at the end of the Peer Review session. We have recently
conducted Peer Reviews for clients like Accenture, ANZ Bank, DBS Bank
amongst other large clients in the region.
Section 2 - 11
The concept is to divide site teams into small functionally-related work groups for
Workplace Services, Engineering and Operations and to encourage each team to
contribute towards continuous improvement. This process is linked with a
quarterly Rewards & Recognition (R&R) program, where the best CIWG teams
are rewarded based on their projects.
CIWG conferences are conducted on a country/city level, on a quarterly basis.
Teams need to present their innovation/improvement project in a presentation
format. All innovation/improvement projects are fully evaluated by a judging
panel, comprising of senior members of the Facilities Management business along
with invited client guests or guests from other Jones Lang LaSalle business units.
Identification of Issue Information flow between day team and 24/7 team
Fragmented Information – Large amount of information in different locations
Contractor Performance – Very hard to monitor contractor performance
Paper trail and waste – Confidentiality and corporate responsibility
Filling Space Shortage – No space required
Access Issues – Easy to establish all access documentation
Possible Solutions 1. Folder with all information – Too fragmented
2. Email with all information – Risk of over communicating
3. Handover at beginning of shift – Too lengthy/Information loss
Solution Implemented Place all relevant information at one location accessible to all
Briefcase to contain:
- All quotes for agreed works to take place
- All risk Assessments for agreed work
- All method statements for agreed work
- Critical emails relating to agreed works
- Access to base building if required for works
- Work summary for agreed works
- Permit to work
Outcomes All work recorded and documented
Better traceability when past information is required
Enhanced CEM scores by providing extensive documentation
Section 2 - 12
Initiative / Date
Description Value Creation
Innovation/ Implemented
Client Services Facilities team created a cost / Feb 2010 Standardize charging cost and
- enhancement manpower setup menu for events easy reference for Catering
of policies and / meeting room setup Team to explain the charging
procedures cost to BUs.
Engineering Take the initiatives to establish Q3 2009 to Provision of standardize
operations guidelines i.e. cleaning Q1 2010 operation guidelines to MSHK
/ handymen / technicians and and information shared among
create a handbook for material all CS teams for the use of
specifications other countries in the region
For full details of initiatives and savings program we have put in placed for
Australia and Hong Kong, please refer to Attachment B - Savings &
Innovations.xls.
Section 2 - 13
Section 3 -
Implementation Timeline
Section 3 - 1
We will schedule and implement a process for regular, effective
communication. We will hold regular, weekly transition status update calls,
provide minutes and action items for any team members that are not able to
attend, and create a dedicated extranet site to keep all team members and
transitioning employees informed of all transition activity.
Implementation of both reactive and planned maintenance requirements
for all countries (including the incumbent countries). We will ensure the
implementation and the roll out of both planned and reactive maintenance
systems and provide guidance on end-user communication and training.
Section 3 - 2
The Transition tracker covers all critical aspects of the transition from Mobilisation
through to Help Desk and Financial Management Establishment. Typically, the
implementation is completed when all milestones have been accepted by Morgan
Stanley and the transition survey has been issued.
Typically, the transition team will continue to at least 1 month after the full service
date to close out all remaining transition items, a process Morgan Stanley should
have experienced in India recently.
Transition-In Tasks to be completed for both new countries and countries where we are incumbent
Transition Team
Section 3 - 3
Transition-In Tasks to be completed for both new countries and countries where we are incumbent
Relationship/ Contract Governance
Planned Maintenance
Facilities Management
Confirm all existing suppliers and status of current arrangements with Morgan Stanley
Agree with the Morgan Stanley on which vendor contracts can be novated and to move from agency
to principal.
Our proposed transition period of the agency model contracts to the principle model will be 4 months
for the selected number of contracts agreed with Morgan Stanley.
Ensure all vendors comply with Jones Lang LaSalle requirements (e.g. Insurance)
Notify vendors on change to Jones Lang LaSalle
Arrange and conduct (will be a transformation requirement) Induction training for critical vendors
Maintain register of vendors
Section 3 - 4
Transition-In Tasks to be completed for both new countries and countries where we are incumbent
Financial Management
Section 3 - 5
Transition Kick Off Workshop will address all potential risks and ensure
contingencies as agreed between both parties.
Likelihood of
Identified Risk Severity Contingency Strategy
Occurrence
Section 3 - 6
Likelihood of
Identified Risk Severity Contingency Strategy
Occurrence
Lessons learnt
We will leverage our understanding of your needs and lessons learnt from our
recent transition in India.
Set the expectation of Morgan Stanley before commencement of transition. We
will explain our roles & responsibilities and the time that will be spent by the
transition manager on site.
Focus on our deliverables while ensuring that Morgan Stanley is kept informed
of the steps we undertake.
Section 3 - 7
Immediate implementation of leading practices, improvements and innovations
Ability to apply “lessons learned” from previous Morgan Stanley and other
transitions and avoid the “pitfalls” inherent in a transition.
Transition Program
Transition Communication
Our communication plans ensure that we communicate relevant information to the
correct people at appropriate stages/times within the transition process. They also
contain a schedule of communication events to ensure that key stakeholders are
always kept properly informed, ensuring their continued buy-in and support.
Section 3 - 8
In addition, we propose to optimise our communication and performance
monitoring with Morgan Stanley using the following means:
Morgan Stanley and Jones Lang LaSalle Functional and Country Specialists
Purpose: This session will ensure that the Transition Plan can be fine tuned if necessary
and that all Jones Lang LaSalle staff are fully conversant with Morgan Stanley
requirements. This ensures that from day one both of the actual transition
teams are familiar with each other and ready to hit the ground running, thereby
maximising productivity and reducing the risk of miscommunication.
Purpose: Review the Transition status, direction and future service delivery activities
Morgan Stanley Nominated Functional Transition Leads (both regional and in-
country)
Frequency: As required
Section 3 - 9
Internal Jones Lang LaSalle Meetings
Attendees: Jones Lang LaSalle Transition Team
Agreement with Morgan Stanley on formats, timing and any system training
requirements
Purpose: To ensure all employees and key stakeholders of Morgan Stanley are fully
engaged in relation to the changeover to Jones Lang LaSalle and the
implications it may have to their working environment (e.g. Help Desk).
Section 3 - 10
Training Completed During Transition Training Completed During Transformation
Development and Confirmation of all agreed Morgan Stanley review and sign off
workflows and processes on agreed workflows
Help Desk
Effective Communications roll out of the Help Pilot test as required
Desk
Recuritment of all agreed key positions Acceptance that all key roles have
Human been filled and there is no impact to
Staff on site and ready to operate on Day 1
service delivery on day 1
Resources
Completion of Completion of all transition tasks as per the Acceptanace by Morgan Stanley on
transition Transition Tracker the completion of the transition
Section 3 - 11
Acceptance Test (min) by the
Milestone Milestone Identification and Measures
Morgan Stanley Transition Lead
Section 3 - 12
Section 4 -
Project Team
Section 4 - 1
The Account team will comprise of the following:
Account Manager (1 FTE) – The Account Manager will be responsible for all
aspects of contract service delivery. We have proposed Louie Lui who has 15 years
in real estate industry – with his last 6 years dealing with banking and financial
clients. Louie will have responsibility for ensuring:
Quality of Facilities Management Services delivered including management of
the overall team in Australia, China and Hong Kong
Senior leadership interaction and ownership of account strategy
Reporting into the governance board on delivery of Morgan Stanley’s
objectives
Regional Engineer (1 FTE) - As part of the account team, we have proposed a
Regional Engineer who will be responsible for all aspect of engineering service
delivery for the 3 locations. He/She will be responsible for the complete rollout of
the CEM program, taking complete responsibility for managing and implementing
best practices and acting as the regional point of escalation for any engineering
issue for the 3 locations. This person will also be involved in energy conservation
management and green environment management.
Regional Finance Team –Admin & Finance Manager (1 FTE) will be
responsible for all aspects of financial management, including budgeting,
reporting, accounts payable processing, capital planning, invoice issue resolution
and compliance matters. The Finance Manager is supported by 1 JDE Finance
Officer and will work closely with in country Finance Managers/ Accounts
Payable Specialists.
At the country level, the Facilities Manager/Chief Engineer will head up the
proposed on-site team. Besides the dedicated Jones Lang LaSalle resources and
vendor partners on-site, he/she will be able to tap onto the Jones Lang LaSalle in-
country head office and IFM infrastructure for operations, human resources and
finance support.
Section 4 - 2
site in Adelaide, Brisbane and Perth. Finally, we have David Mitchinson, Project
Manager, currently based at The Bond supporting the Morgan Stanley projects
team.
We have not included pricing for an on-site Handyman at any location as we
propose the 24/7 Critical Environment Officers provide this support out of hours.
It should be further clarified that remote sites will have a different management
model and we will utilise our sub-contractors to provide handyman duties.
We have also excluded the Administration Manager as discussed during the
Clarifications as the services currently being provided, this is out of the existing
RFP scope.
Section 4 - 3
oversee the soft services vendor staff consisting of housekeeping, receptionist and
driver.
In addition, we have dedicated team of technical resources based to look after
Morgan Stanley’s operations and maintenance requirements. Our network of OEM
vendor partners will provide ad hoc or scheduled maintenance as applicable.
The team will have strong leadership and senior management oversight from
Natina Wong. Natina will ensure that the team receives all the support (from
training, advice, resourcing, admin, HR, etc) from the head office. She will also be
the point of contact for any major escalations and will be participating in monthly
and quarterly reviews with the management team of Morgan Stanley.
Proposed Delivery Team – China (Phase 2 – Office move from Bund Center to SWFC and Kerry
Parkside)
Section 4 - 4
Delivery team for Hong Kong
We propose the Hong Kong delivery team to remain as per the existing Jones Lang
LaSalle team delivering the services currently to Morgan Stanley. It will be
headed by the Chief Engineer, Stephen Marr, supporting Property Operations
function and the Facilities Manager supporting Facilities function. Phoebe Shum,
being our Facilities Manager at present, will be relocating to Shanghai Jones Lang
LaSalle IFM business, we are having a candidate interviewing with Morgan
Stanley. The two team leaders are supported by Christina Wong, Administration
Manager for Finance/Admin/Compliance who is primarily responsible for
invoicing, billing and petty cash claims. Anna Lung is the Assistant Facilities
Manager in charge of the Soft Services and Eric Ng is another Assistant Facilities
Manager to manage our vendor partner for housekeeping.
Min Thura Aung, our Comms Manager, will be responsible for all Morgan Stanley
Comms Area Engineering services, supported by a dedicated team of in house
engineer and technical staff.
The helpdesk function will be supported by 2 full-time helpdesk officer 2 part-time
helpdesk officer which is the existing arrangement we have for Morgan Stanley.
In addition, we have introduced a MAC Engineer who will report to the Chief
Engineer to manage all MAC requirements. The MAC Engineer will be
responsible for:
daily liaison works with the BUs
works scheduling
works budget and forecast
space planning and furniture management
records maintenance
Part-time Technical Support will be provided for weekend moves works and
the scope of services will include supervision of MAC vendors, escorting of
MAC vendors and coordination with BUs and Building Management during the
move. We will be charging a daily rate of HK$2,340 for each technical support
during the weekend and the overnight shift will be HK$3,510.
In our proposed MAC team structure, we have not put in any IT MAC position
as we plan to absorb all the IT MAC works within our existing Hong Kong
team by ensuring all the technicians and handymen are trained adequately to
provide IT MAC services.
Section 4 - 5
Proposed Delivery Team – Hong Kong (Standalone country award)
Section 4 - 6
Proposed Delivery Team – Hong Kong (2 or 3 locations ward)
Section 4 - 7
In the event we are awarded 2 or more countries, we would be adding 2 full time
helpdesk officer.
4.2 Key Roles (a short bio on the key individuals in the project)
The proposed Account Manager, Louie Lui will be responsible for strategizing a
road map with Morgan Stanley for long term sustainable service delivery. As
Morgan Stanley single point of contact for facilities in Australia, China and Hong
Kong, He will be supported by the Facility Managers in each of the locations. Our
model envisages local delivery with support in the form of best practices,
technology and training from the regional team.
The Facility Managers will drive operations by translating strategies and agreed
deliverables into actions, and overseeing their execution by the dedicated, on-site
team located in Morgan Stanley’s premises. Following are the profiles of key team
members who will be working on the Morgan Stanley Account.
Section 4 - 8
Name and designation Credentials
David Mitchinson Over 20 years’ experience in project management and architectural
design
Project Manager
(Australia) Responsible for management and delivery of multiple projects within
Morgan Stanley environment throughout Australia
Past PM experiences include clients such as The Royal Bank of Scotland
and Goldman Sachs in London.
David was also Director of Architectural Design and Project Management
for Fisheye Architecture Limited
Kenta Plaxton Over 8 years’ experience in the construction and real estate industry
Facilities Manager Completed a B. Building (Construction Management) and training in Risk
(Australia) Management, Contractor Management, and Critical Environment
Management
Areas of specialisation include facilities services, critical environments,
project work, planned preventative maintenance
Past experiences include construction management on large construction
projects, facilities management at a national and regional level on a global
account (CA).
Section 4 - 9
Name and designation Credentials
Teresa Liang Over 11 years relevant work experience in integrated facilities
management and project management
Proposed Facilities
Manager (Beijing, Expertise includes Account Management, Engineering, Environmental
China) Health & Safety Management, HVAC and General Workplace
Management
Good communication and coordination skill, excellent interpersonal skills
and good team management skills
Skilled in project management, ISO 9000/14000/18000 system, local
health and safety regulations.
Mechanical Engineering Degree
Fluent in English and Mandarin, Basis Japanese
Morgan Stanley will benefit in drawing support from our in-country and specialist
teams. Our in-country and specialist infrastructure teams include our operations
group, Subject Matter Experts, IT, HR & finance which are all critical elements of
any service delivery platform.
We have provided their brief bio below.
Specialist Support Team
Name and designation Credentials
Greg Wallace 20 years of engineering expertise, with 9 years in real estate industry
Critical Environment Chairman of the Australasian Critical Environment Management Board
Management (Australia) and is also a member of the Regional Board.
Responsible for ensuring that Jones Lang LaSalle’s Engineering and
Operations service delivery is maintained at the highest level and
continues to exceed the expectations of our clients.
Current role provides Engineering & Operations Management at a
national level for our Retail and IFM business lines.
Jon Lockhart More than 22 years of experience in Facilities Management across the
Commercial & Industrial sectors
Health & Safety
(Australia) Areas of focus include Risk Management, Occupational Health and
Safety and Incident Management.
Past experiences include Regional facilities management roles with
American Express and Australian Mutual Provident.
Tertiary qualifications in Electrical Engineering, and Business
Management.
Section 4 - 10
Name and designation Credentials
Chris Wallbank 30 Years experience in sustainable developments
Energy & Sustainability 15 years focused on building performance improvements with new and
(Australia) existing property
Current responsibilities include to champion sustainable programs and to
demonstrate the tangible benefits of a well documented and cost effective
sustainability program for new and existing clients
Projects include design of numerous landmark commercial, retail, hotel,
education and health care developments throughout Australia.
Allen Liang With over 18 years experience in all aspects of electrical engineering,
facilities and project management
Energy & Sustainability
(North Asia) Over 10 years of experience in energy and sustainability.
Areas of specialization include electrical distribution, building automation
and energy management system for commercial, industrial, and mission
critical facilities.
Certified by the US Green Building Council as a Leadership in Energy &
Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP) and Six Sigma
Green Belt Certified.
Section 4 - 11
In-Country Support Team
Name and designation Credentials
Chris Hunt Responsible for Integrated Facilities Management throughout Australia
Regional Director, and New Zealand for Jones Lang LaSalle
Australasia Hub Lead
Holds formal qualifications in Engineering and Business Management and
is currently completing an MBA with the University of South Australia.
Over 10 years experience at Jones Lang LaSalle including two year
assignment in India, where he established Jones Lang LaSalle IFM
business as market leader.
Founding member and shareholder in the UK based Procord FM
Company which was formed as a result of an MBO from IBM.
Specific interest in leading and developing new talent within the Real
Estate services industry and also retains a keen interest in the business
continuity aspects of managing Mission Critical Environments.
Sheryl Matthews Brings 25 years experience in the property industry and holds a bachelor
of business from the University of Southern Queensland.
Director of Operation,
Australasia In her 12 years with the firm she has worked in the Property Management
business and also spent an extended period leading the IFM business in
South East Asia.
Has played a valuable role in the transition of Telstra and her drive, wit,
skill and personality were vital to this successful transition.
Section 4 - 12
Name and designation Credentials
Julius Lau Over 16 years work experience in China based in Beijing, including 10
years with Jones Lang LaSalle
Head of IFM (China)
Oversees the IFM business in China taking on a strategic capacity for
more than 30 accounts covering more than 18.5 million sf
Experience in project management, Facilities management and
Transactions management
Also acted as the Regional Account Director for NCR for the Asia Pacific
region working out of the Beijing and Sydney hubs for over 4 years
Natina Wong Over 17 years experience in facilities operations and corporate real estate
Head of IFM - More than 10 years senior management experience with strong customer
Commercial Hub (China and service delivery focus, strong results orientation and track record of
execution
Broad FM experience with MNC like Nortel, Sun Microsystems and JP
Morgan
Certified Facility Manager
Member of the International Facility Management Association
External Moderator, DFM, City University SCOPE, Hong Kong
Former Director, IFMA Hong Kong Chapter
Richard Myers Over 20 years experience in corporate real estate involved in design,
project management and facility management
Head of IFM (Hong
Kong) Oversees the IFM business in Hong Kong taking on a strategic capacity
for more than 35 accounts
Ensures contract deliverability and client satisfaction
Extensive experience in managing large and complex facilities
Ability to identify key business issues and apply appropriate real estate
strategies and tactical planning expertise
Able to draw on the full regional resources and expertise of Jones Lang
LaSalle as required
Masters Degree in Facility Management, CFM, MRICS
Samuel Ma 20 years of Corporate services and facilities management experience,
Operations Director and, including 10 years of experience in the banking industry
(Hong Kong) Current role include assisting the FM head in driving Operations
Compliance, Engineering & Operations Solutions
Past experiences include setting up on-site facilities management team
and necessary management process, managing multiple MNC accounts,
launching best practice for operational efficiencies, and compliance for
Facility and Engineering Management
Professional interest: Engineering services management, Technology
adoption in technical service industry and Maintenance Management
University of Warwick, Master of Science (Engineering Management)
Section 4 - 13
4.3 Resource Plan (in the format as per Appendix)
The resource plan has been determined keeping in mind the various services
required at all Morgan Stanley sites. The approach to service delivery is through an
account management structure. As already indicated within the section ‘2.5
Account Management’ of ‘Delivery Approach’ we have identified Louie Lui, as
the Account Manager for the contract who will be responsible for all client
management and be responsible for delivery of services on a day to day basis.
Louie will be supported by a dedicated onsite team. He will act as Single Point of
Contact for Australia, China and Hong Kong and will be present at all meetings
and is ultimately accountable for the overall performance of the contract with
Morgan Stanley, and will take a hands-on approach to your strategy and overall
direction.
He will ensure that the SLAs, along with standards and processes, are developed,
implemented and maintained throughout the course of the contract term. He has the
full responsibility to support Morgan Stanley and provide consistent, high quality
real estate services to your portfolio and ensure your complete satisfaction with our
relationship.
The proposed teams have been configured to meet the requirements of service
delivery across the 3 locations while keeping in mind the cost of doing business for
the Morgan Stanley.
Depending on the number of the sites, the size and complexity of the facilities in
each country, the Facilities lead/Chief Engineer at a county level will either
manage the team directly to deliver these services or be assisted by a Facilities
Coordinator, Assistant Facilities Manager or Engineer.
Each site will have a site lead that will be responsible for monitoring attendance
and delivery of on ground services to Morgan Stanley. The site leads will all
report to the facilities lead at a country level and who in turn reports to the Account
Manager who will monitor their performance based on the standards agreed in the
contract. The approach taken while deciding on the site team deployment is that
the team should work as an independent unit for all day to day operational
requirements. They will be supported by the core team and the respective Jones
Lang LaSalle corporate team as required.
Section 4 - 14
Resource Plan for Australia
Senior FM / Engineer 1 1
Facilities Manager 0.6 0.4 0.25 1.25
Office Administrator 1 1
Project Manager 1 1
24/7 Critical Environment 3.5 3.5 7
Account Director 0.1 0.1
FM (MS & MSSB) - Mel 0.25 0.25
FM (MS & MSSB) - Bne 0.2 0.2
FM (MS & MSSB) - Adl 0.2 0.2
FM (MS & MSSB) - Per 0.2 0.2
Total 5.1 5.9 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.2 0.2 12.2
* Phase 1 / ** Phase 2
Our delivery model in China will be separated in two phases due to Morgan
Stanley move from Bund Center Shanghai to SWFC and Kerry Parkside in
Shanghai, China.
Section 4 - 15
Resource Plan for Hong Kong
International
Position Commerce Centre
Chief Engineer 1
Comms Manager 1
Engineers 4
Technical / MAC Officer 3
Senior Technicians / Technicians 12
Facilities Manager 1
Assistant Facilities Manager 2
Senior Facilities Officer / Facilities Officer 2
Handymen 5
Administration Manager 1
Finance Office 1
Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) 2
Helpdesk Officer (Part-Time) 2
Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) (only if 2 or more locations are awarded) 2
Total 37 (39)
All the best practices rolled out at the country level will be percolated to the sites
through the Account Manager via the facilities leads. They will in turn be
encouraged to generate recommendations that deliver improvement through our
CIWG program. Where possible these best practices will be implemented at all
Morgan Stanley sites.
Section 4 - 16
improvement initiatives and introduces performance measures that drive
continuous improvement.
Together, we can identify certain areas of service delivery where Six Sigma
methodology is needed and implement process improvements that reduce cycle
time and cost, provide increased response time to internal clients and increase the
stature of the shared services organization in the view of senior management.
Section 4 - 17
Section 5 -
Commercial Offer
5.1 Fee
Management fee – this is worked out as a percentage (%) mark-up of staff costs.
Our management fee comprises of two key components:
Profit
Overheads
- Local Facilities Management infrastructure: This is the team at a local
level which will be supporting the on site resources with best practices,
tools and procedures, operational and management support
- Regional best practices group: This team will be interacting with the
Morgan Stanley Corporate Services to ensure the on site team is fully
conversant with Morgan Stanley’s internal practices and or any joint
practices the two teams will produce. This team will also be part of various
training programs and compliance reviews from time to time
- Regional Management: This is the regional management team which
supports the overall performance of the account, acts as a point of
escalation and runs the governance process together with senior level
engagement from the Morgan Stanley Corporate Services team.
With the size of our business across the region, the overheads cost represent only a
small % loading to each account. The overhead cost component is allocated out to
each account on the basis of the account portfolio size keeping in mind the existing
client base and future capacity of this team.
Management Fee
Section 5 - 1
Singapore and Taiwan. We will be entitled to 85% of the proposed management
fee as a base management fee for managing Morgan Stanley’s portfolio financially
and administratively. The 15% management fee under the risk and reward program
has to be earned by Jones Lang LaSalle through achievement of pre-agreed key
performance indicators (KPIs). We are challenging ourselves to a potential
minimum save of 5% on controllable costs with fee at risk for non-performance.
The measurement of KPIs will be evaluated on a country by country basis and
totaled up to a regional score in the event we are awarded all 3 locations –
Australia, China and Hong Kong. Key countries may carry a heavier weighting
compared to others. We can mutually agree on the final model.
Share of Saves: 20% of any saves achieved above an agreed threshold.
Administration Fee: this fee is worked out as a percentage (%) mark-up of the
total managed spend for taking on principal role. If Morgan Stanley awards all the
locations to Jones Lang LaSalle, we are happy to reduce the percentage to 2.5%
(our existing arrangement with Singapore and Taiwan is 3%) and provide financial
management and reporting through OneView Financials powered by JD Edwards
to Morgan Stanley at no additional cost. One of the benefits of OneView
Financials include standard accounting approach which allows teams to accurately
benchmark costs to a high level of detail. This in turn used to help Morgan Stanley
drive best practice, in terms of both service delivery and cost.
Administration Fee
Implementation and Transition Fee - One time cost which would be charged
during the transition phase, prior to going live with the operations. This would
include travel expenses for China only.
Section 5 - 2
Combination Australia China Hong Kong
- 360Facility, Satellite Helpdesk
e) Australia $0
- 360Facility, Property Service Centre
f) China US$5,000
- 360Facility, Property Service Centre
g) Hong Kong $0
- 360Facility, Property Service Centre
Section 5 - 3
Appendix 1 -
References
(1)
Company name
Our clients are happy to act as referees should Morgan Stanley wish
to talk to them and the preferred mode of contact is through Richard
Contact tel / email Myers, our point of contact for this RFP. We would be happy to
arrange a call if you wish to contact our client.
Facility Management,
Building Maintenance,
Project Management,
Landlord liaison,
Preventive Maintenance
Energy Management
1
(2)
Company name
(Hong Kong)
Our clients are happy to act as referees should Morgan Stanley wish
to talk to them and the preferred mode of contact is through Richard
Contact tel / email Myers, our point of contact for this RFP. We would be happy to
arrange a call if you wish to contact our client.
Facility Management,
Client Hospitality
Security Services
Catering Management
Project Management,
Landlord liaison,
Preventive Maintenance
Energy Management
2
(3)
Company name
(China)
Our clients are happy to act as referees should Morgan Stanley wish
to talk to them and the preferred mode of contact is through Richard
Contact tel / email Myers, our point of contact for this RFP. We would be happy to
arrange a call if you wish to contact our client.
Facility Management,
Building Maintenance,
Helpdesk
Landlord liaison,
Preventive Maintenance
Energy Management
3
Appendix 2 -
On-Site Team CVs
Please refer to the Part 2 section 4.2 Key Roles for the CV’s of our proposed On-
Site team.
1
Part 3 – General Requirement
Part 3 -
General Requirement
1
leaseback. Our existing industrial agency businesses are undergoing training
and development programs to increase occupier related skill levels.
2
(ii) Financial Information
Copies of audited accounts for the last 2 years.
Further finance information including debt rating and annual report of the firm are
available on our global website –
(http://www.joneslanglasalle.com/Pages/InvestorRelations.aspx).
Last 2 years Annual reports enclosed as Attachment E for reference.
3
Jones Lang LaSalle (NYSE:JLL) is a financial and professional services firm
specializing in real estate. The firm offers integrated services delivered by expert
teams worldwide to clients seeking increased value by owning, occupying or
investing in real estate. With 2008 global revenue of $2.7 billion, Jones Lang
LaSalle serves clients in 60 countries from 750 locations worldwide, including 180
corporate offices. The firm is an industry leader in property and corporate facility
management services, with a portfolio of approximately 1.4 billion square feet
worldwide. LaSalle Investment Management, the company’s investment
management business, is one of the world’s largest and most diverse in real estate
with more than $46 billion of assets under management.
Jones Lang LaSalle has over 50 years of experience in Asia Pacific, with over
17,200 employees operating in 74 offices in 14 countries across the region.
Jones Lang LaSalle’s Mission & Value which is followed at every site in every
country where we operate is as follows:
Mission Statement
To deliver exceptional strategic, fully integrated services and solutions for real estate
owners, occupiers and investors worldwide.
Vision
To be the chosen real estate expert and strategic advisor to the leading owners,
occupiers and investors around the world.
Values
Our firm’s three core values are: Serve our Clients, Support our People and Aspire to
Leadership. These values drive our culture and are the main key components of our
quality assurance program.
For further information, please visit our Web site, www.joneslanglasalle.com
4
Asia Pacific Organizational Chart
(3) Provide a copy of the organisation structure for the division which will carry out this
project
5
management team has worked together for multiple years and is one of the most
experienced and stable leadership group in the region.
Jones Lang LaSalle's Engineering & Operations Solutions team (EOS) is a
professional support team acting as a knowledge and skills centre for the
delivery of international best practices to all Jones Lang LaSalle client and
services teams across Asia Pacific. EOS is a US$6 million investment by the
firm in ensuring accounts like Morgan Stanley receive full acess to global and
regional practices, technology, etc. Composed of subject matter specialists from
key areas such as Critical Enivronment Management (CEM), Energy
Management, Risk Managament, and EOS ensures the infusion of our global
experience and best-practices across the Management Solutions services –
Asset, Property and Integrated Facilities Management – and into local markets
so our clients can have the competitive edge in a rapidly evolving business
environment. With representation in all four hubs and support from in-country
operational resources Morgan Stanley can be assured of quicker and direct
implementation of initiatives.
6
Key to the success of the EOS team’s delivery is its geographic spread across the
Asia Pacific region for quicker and direct implementation of initiatives.
We have provided the FM country support infrastructure for Australia, China and
Hong Kong below.
Australia IFM Country Team
The Australia team is led by Chris Hunt, who is also the Australasia Hub lead. The
team manages more than 39 million sq ft of space for banks, logistics firms,
industrial and institutional clients.
7
China IFM Country Team
The China team is led by Julius Lau who is currently based in Beijing. The China
team is divided into 3 hubs – Northern, Central and Southern to support the diverse
geographical spread of our client portfolios in China. The team currently manages
more than 18 million sq ft of space, including 6.7 million sq ft of banking and
financial space. Some of our key banking clients include Citi, HSBC, JP Morgan,
Royal Bank of Scotland, and Standard Chartered Bank.
With a long and extensive track record in providing facility management services
both in the region and China, we have developed a series of tools, technologies,
processes, governance and procedures. Below is a snapshot of what we have
accomplished in China in 2010:
We have successfully completed transition for 14 clients. The portfolio
involved exceeds 3.5 million square feet.
We have developed a Relocation Guideline and supported the office relocation
for our clients. The biggest office move projects involved more than 1,500
employees. We are aware that Morgan Stanley is planning a major move in
Shanghai in Q3 2011. Our past experiences in supporting our clients in this
area would definitely help Morgan Stanley.
We have implemented an Integrated testing, otherwise known as “Pull the
Plug” or “End to End” testing cross the board for key accounts in China. This
testing allows us to verify that all critical systems installed for a data centre can
be confirmed as working correctly and interactively in the event of a power
outage or other failure.
We have established training material for occupational risks and continued to
drive and lead environmental programs for our clients.
8
We have achieved a realised savings of over RMB 4 million for our
commercial clients in 2010 alone.
(4) Provide an organisation chart for the project team(s) proposed to fulfill the Statements of
Requirement and show clearly their relationship with main management structure in the
organisation.
As mentioned earlier in Part 2 Section 4 Project Team , the Jones Lang LaSalle
account delivery support infrastructure to Morgan Stanley is currently at 4 levels.
• Level 1: Dedicated on-site resources comprising of Jones Lang LaSalle and
Vendor resources working on the Morgan Stanley account.
• Level 2: Jones Lang LaSalle in-country IFM Operations and Management team
(Country head, Operation leads, Critical Systems, Health & Safety,
Sustainability)
• Level 3: JLL Best Practices Platform i.e. the Engineering and Operations
Solutions (EOS) group, a central team of 91 functional specialist resources
across the region. Specialisations include Transition, Health & Safety, Energy
& Sustainability, Engineering & Operations, Supply Chain, Technology, Risk
Management & Compliance and Critical Environment Management
• Level 4: Jones Lang LaSalle Country Infrastructure Resources which includes
HR, IT, and Finance
The main management structure is level 2 which we have provided the details
earlier.
9
Proposed Delivery Team – Overview (3 locations award)
Our proposed Account Manager, Louie Lui would be charged with the
responsibility of ensuring consistent quality in our service delivery. The Account
Manager will be additionally supported by Nathan Taylor – Graduate Regional
Account Director, who will have the responsibility for providing operational
support regionally and will be the point of escalation.
The Account Manager will direct strategy development and key initiatives
affecting service delivery, and will have full accountability for achieving Morgan
Stanley’s financial and operational goals. We have detailed the on-site team’s
relationship with our management team in the earlier part of our proposal under 2.5
Account Management and 2.7 Off-Site Management/Support Services.
10
Proposed Delivery Team – China (Phase 1)
Proposed Delivery Team – China (Phase 2 – Office move from Bund Center to SWFC and Kerry
Parkside)
11
Proposed Delivery Team – Hong Kong (Standalone country award)
12
Proposed Delivery Team – Hong Kong (2 or 3 locations ward)
13
(iv) Experience / Track Record
Describe track record for carrying out projects similar to that proposed. Include details of
resources and skill-sets used. State if these resources were in-house or contract staff
We provide comprehensive facilities management services to corporations and
institutions that outsource the management of the real estate they occupy.
Properties under management range from corporate headquarters to industrial
complexes. In Asia Pacific, we manage more 130 corporate accounts with over
155 million square feet under management.
Some of our key regional clients in the Asia Pacific region with similar scope of
work have been shown below:
14
Our Client Experiences
Service(s) Provided
Workplace Services
Budget & Financial
Portfolio Planning
Operational Risk
Representation
Procurement &
Administration
Capital Works
Unscheduled
Development
Coordination
Management
Management
Management
Management
Management
Maintenance
Maintenance
Occupancy
Scheduled
Project &
Strategic
Planning
Contract
Services
Account
Since
Tenant
Lease
Lease
Client Countries
Client Supported
ANZ Bank AUS, HK, SG, NZ ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 2002
AUS, CHN, HK, IND, JP,
Citi KR, MSIA, SG, TWN, ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 2002
THA
AUS, CHN, HK, IND, JP,
Computer Associates
KR, MSIA, SG, TWN
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 2005
15
Appended below are Our key client statistics with similar complexity of operations
as Morgan Stanley at a country level
Australia
JP Morgan 214,608 Commercial 4.6 FTEs Self-performed
office space FM (1 FTE)
FC (1 FTE) *all the downstream
FA (1 FTE) services are
AFM (1 FTE) subcontracted - JLL is
Security Admin (Part Time 3 Agent.
days per week)
China
16
Type of Details of resources and skill- Self-performed /
Client Sq Ft facilities sets used. Subcontracted *
experience
Hong Kong
17
Type of Details of resources and skill- Self-performed /
Client Sq Ft facilities sets used. Subcontracted *
engineering exp
18
Banking and Finance Experience in Facilities Management
We manage facilities for 24 other financial institutions across the Asia Pacific
region. We are confident that the best practices learnt from the management of
such accounts will be transferred to Morgan Stanley’s portfolio.
(v) References
Provide references in three organizations (preferably in the Financial Services Industry) of
similar size and geographic spread where projects of similar nature have been carried out
with values of those contracts. Referees must be accessible for Morgan Stanley to contact
and get direct feedback.
Please refer to our response in Appendix 1 - References
(vi) Personnel
Provide list of key personnel to be involved in the project including their CV’s. It should be
noted that following the award of the contract, personnel nominated at that time cannot be
changed without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley. Likewise, Contractor’s
personnel deemed unsuitable by Morgan Stanley will be removed from the project team.
Please refer to our response for Section 4.2 Key Roles for short bio of our
proposed team.
(vii) Sub-Contractor
It is intended that no element of this service should be sub-contracted without the prior
written consent of Morgan Stanley unless otherwise stated in this RFP. If you are proposing
sub-contracting / letting or assigning any element of the service, please state your reasons.
In addition, please detail who will perform these services and complete every section in the
Request for Proposal with specific reference to each sub-contracted service.
19
Jones Lang LaSalle self performs the complete management of the contract, which
is the existing arrangement we have in Australia and China. This model has proven
to be effective and we would continue using this approach. In the new model as a
“principal” party to the contract we would be liable for all deliverables to Morgan
Stanley. We have developed partners through a careful tender process for services
such as housekeeping, mechanical, & electrical services amongst others. Over the
years, Jones Lang LaSalle has worked with the management of many of the vendor
organizations to raise their expertise, through training and corporate processes and
procedures.
We are committed to strengthening and developing its supplier relationships in
order to provide value to our clients,. Our Supply Chain Management (SCM) team,
led out of Singapore, facilitates the delivery of procurement activity across the
region for all clients.
Initially the SCM team will determine whether to self perform or work with
strategic partners. To determine self delivery against alliance strategy, the SCM
team undertakes a decision process designed to enhance best value for our client
We adopt a transparent approach with our clients in partnering with the sub
vendor. We employ a structured process which will enable us to shortlist the most
appropriate sub vendor for Morgan Stanley, which is a core task of transition
process. In consultation with Morgan Stanley we will establish the process for
determining the vendors who would partner with us for service delivery at your
facility. We can do a formal RFP process for the same or advise our inputs which
will enable you to decide our sub-vendors. In the event Morgan Stanley would like
us to finalize and deploy a vendor based on our experience, we would be glad to do
so. We would like to state that irrespective of the sub-vendor, we would have full
(100%) accountability for our services.
All the key management Staff at site will be under Jones Lang LaSalle’s payroll
and the rest of the services like Housekeeping, M&E, Engineering Operations and
Maintenance Staff, Pest Control, Landscaping, Concierge Services, Security, etc
are outsourced/sub-contracted. For details on who will perform these services,
please refer to Attachment A - Service Requirement & Service Level.xls
20
(viii) Value Added Services: [TECHNOLOGY for FACILITY MANAGEMENT]
It is intended to utilize the facility management technology tools for the services to be carried
out under this contract. The vendor is to submit with their tender details of the tools available
and that would be used for this contract along with sample documentation of what can be
achieved with this tool.
21
The second tier works in the background to analyze and churn out data suitable for
end users.
OneView Analytics is also able to integrate data from Morgan Stanley owned
systems, such as Ariba, Omega, and Clarity.
My Facility Property
Satellite Service OneView
System Helpdesk (HK)* Centre** 360 Facility Financials
360 Facility
We regularly evaluate software solutions against functional needs of our delivery
teams. As part of our ongoing improvements and feedback from Morgan Stanley,
we would like to introduce 360Facility to replace Maximo as the Morgan Stanley’s
regional asset and maintenance platform. 360Facility would be able to provide
Morgan Stanley with the functionality of forecasting and budgeting. We will also
transition the Australian operations from Maximo to 360Facility at no cost to
Morgan Stanley.
22
360Facility, one of our CMMS system provides an integrated set of modules that
when deployed together provide a complete solution for maintenance, service
delivery, equipment and warranty tracking. It is web-based and includes on-board
mobile capabilities as part of the core software.
The system provides quick and ready access to work orders and preventive
maintenance routines. 360Facility also provides an essential foundation for our
team and its subcontractor partners to manage all work within a single work order
system.
Fully customizable reports include: request/work order summary, request/work
order detail, daily schedule of activities, full schedule of activities, labor
utilization, work order summary by account, work order review, invoice back up,
work order labor and materials summary, service level tracking, asset listing,
schedule listing, company listing, inspection summary and inspection detail.
360Logbook: Action
items created and
assigned as
inspection data is
being recorded, with
defined responsibility
and tracking of correct
action items.
23
The 360 platform gives us the ability to:
Improve customer service: Improves response time through real-time dispatch
of work and communication of progress back to the site team: the right
information is delivered to the right person at the right time
Improve service level management: Record service times and response
intervals to manage specific service level agreement objectives
Increase customer satisfaction: Provide a consistent, standard and high-quality
customer experience
Increase employee satisfaction: Require less paperwork (when using wireless
technology) and provide an intuitive system to operate
Increase control over preventive maintenance: More control of tasks and
labor hours associated with preventative maintenance and reactive maintenance
leads to opportunities to reduce labor costs
Improve management awareness: Improve visibility of the performance of
employees, contractors and facilities
Universal access to information: Since the system was built for the Internet
from the ground up, anyone with access to the Internet can be given access the
system
Reduce equipment failures: Timely inspection programs can uncover
problems while they are still minor and before they cause major equipment
failures. As a result, routine adjustments and minor repairs take the place of
catastrophic failures. Unplanned breakdowns can typically be reduced by up to
50 percent.
Increase planned work: Inspections and preventive maintenance work orders
are planned and become a key part of a proactive planned maintenance
operation. Sufficient lead-time from early detection allows for effective
planning of parts, crafts, and special equipment.
Decrease emergency repairs: An effective CMMS program allows the
maintenance staff to be alert for situations that cause problems. As a result, the
need for emergency repairs lessens.
24
Capture charge type breakdown
Assigning business unit or charge code to work orders
Ability to choose from selection of vendors for a given work type
Insurance and warranty contract tracking
Helpdesk operator prompts, flashes, service notes during call logging
Track and record response times (separate to completion time)
25
Workflow Management
26
Step 4. Notification Dispatched to Requestor
As soon as a work order is dispatched, the initial notification is automatically sent
to the requester via email. The notification advises the requester what action has
been taken as a result of their request. Notifications can also be automatically sent
to anyone who wishes to track all activity within any building, tenancy or the entire
account.
Helpdesk Analytics
Our helpdesk performance-benchmarking tool enables interactive analysis for a
variety of dimensions and measures across the entire service request database. The
tool enables analysis on various key performance indicators such as:
Completion performance of work orders by month and by work type category
Contractor performance
Number of complaints
Cost of unscheduled services
Trend of service requests over time
27
Benchmarking service and cost
Customer satisfaction.
Portfolio Reports.
This is a powerful tool in ensuring that the tenants are being serviced well and are
satisfied with the responses that they get from the management team and the
building contractors.
Helpdesk Queries
This filter based reporting tool enables customised service request queries to be
generated. It can display detailed information about each service request, from the
initial service requestdescription to the ongoing history notes, allowing review of
unresolved issues and targeting these to ensure caller satisfaction.
28
OneView Financials
Our proposed solution to Morgan Stanley to more effectively manage their vendors
payments and facility costs would be to leverage on our OneView Financial
Platform. We have also previously presented to Morgan Stanley’s Australia team
to streamline the financial processes and reporting via this system which is
powered by JD Edwards.
OneView Financials is our globally deployed accounting and sourcing platform
used for all significant global, regional and national clients. The system is managed
by a global/regional management structure, ensuring that process and control
standards are maintained globally and benefit from our global investments for
continual improvements to the platform. Recent examples of this are Jones Lang
LaSalle’s SAS70 type II audit of the internal controls and processes employed for
the Accounts Payable process employed on OneView Financials. This audit is
performed by KPMG and has a global scope, meaning that Jones Lang LaSalle
must ensure the processes and control environments are robust and uniformly
executed in order to deliver this standard.
Process example: Management, Development, Control & Support of OneView Financials & Sourcing
29
Process example: Accounts Payable
Our standard processes – or Global Enterprise Models – determine how
transactions are process on OneView Financials. Compliance requirements within
Sarbanes-Oxley have heightened the focus placed on understanding financial
reporting controls and identified a SAS70 Type II report as the only acceptable
method for a third party to assure a service organisation’s controls.
In order to declare sound internal controls, SAS70 is the way to measure them to a
standard. This is done via the Integrated Facilities Management global audit, and
this relies on a number of key internal controls being in place globally. The control
objectives highlighted below are supported by the security environment on
OneView Financials. Access to OneView Financials (Enterprise 1) is limited to
authorised individuals for an account and access is granted based on assigned job
function and must be approved by a Regional Global Platform Finance Manager or
Director. This ensures that for each process step, necessary segregation of duties
can be applied.
The process illustration below represents our Global Enterprise Model for general
Facility Management Expenses.
30
Integrated data reporting solution
For regional reporting we will use our One View Analytics platform as the
business intelligence platform to provide Morgan Stanley with fact driven
operational insight from one single system. We understand that Morgan Stanley
has a number of internal technology applications in the areas of procurement,
financials, and budgeting. We recognise that some of these applications will still
play a vital part in Morgan Stanley’s corporate real estate operation.
We have proposed to use OneView Analytics in our alternate proposal only in
order to reap the full benefit of synthesizing a complete, harmonious view of multi-
countries’ data at a portfolio, geographical, site or business unit level.
We will provide a secured portal for the monthly upload of data from the Morgan
Stanley systems. These data will then be consolidated into our reporting database
along with the Morgan Stanley data from our Jones Lang LaSalle systems to
populate the necessary reports and dashboards.
Proposed System Data Flow Details - Utilising data from both Jones Lang LaSalle and Morgan Stanley
systems.
31
Depending on the number of countries Jones Lang LaSalle will be awarded and the
systems Morgan Stanley would like us to implement, the one-off implementation
cost and on-going cost will vary. Appended below is an overview in US dollars:
Combination Implement Cost On-Going Cost p.a.
a) Australia, China and Hong Kong
- OneView Financials, Satellite Helpdesk, 360Facility 20,000 17,392 *
b) Australia and China
- 360Facility, Property Service Centre 16,000 19,527
c) Australia and Hong Kong
- 360Facility, Satellite Helpdesk 12,000 15,961*
d) China and Hong Kong
- 360Facility, Satellite Helpdesk 19,500 16,384*
e) Australia
- 360Facility, Property Service Centre 4,500 8,811
f) China
- 360Facility, Property Service Centre 12,000 10,716
g) Hong Kong
- 360Facility, Property Service Centre 7,500 27,864
*Exclude the salary cost of the helpdesk officers which is included under Facilities Management Services
Cost.
32
Part 4 – Alternative Proposal
Part 4 -
Alternative Proposal
Delivery Team
Through different client experiences, we have learnt how to establish client-
specific, regional Account Team structures that strike the right balance between
coordination/control on a regional level and flexibility/customization for differing
client business unit needs and accommodate regional to local level variations.
We have had discussions with Morgan Stanley in the past on various account
management models and to some extent there was a broad agreement that while
delivery will happen at the country level, there will always be programs, processes
and controls that will need to be delivered consistently and hence the need for a
regional account management structure.
We follow a ‘lite’ touch regional program management model for clients like JP
Morgan , Goldman Sachs, Citi etc whereas for other financial institutions like
Barclays, Deutsche Bank, ANZ, RBS, we follow a deeper regional model with
direction and management of the account from the regional team. With a regional
model covering all countries under our management, we would seek to upgrade the
role of an Account Manager (AM) to Regional Account Director (RAD) if Jones
Lang LaSalle is given a 3-country award. As a demonstration of our commitment
to Morgan Stanley, we will be funding a large proportion of the RAD costs.
Our alternate account team will be headed up by the proposed RAD, Alex Perkins
who will be accountable for the facilities management service delivery, driving
consistency, risk management and the savings initiatives in all the countries Jones
Lang LaSalle is currently managing as well as China. Alex will be supported by
country leads in Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Philippines,
Singapore and Taiwan.
Alternate Structure
1
Similarly, in the alternate proposal, the Account team (level 1) for Morgan Stanley
will be able to draw on support from the Governance Board, level 2 – local IFM
management, level 3 – Best Practices group (EOS) and level 4 – local country
management as outlined in the earlier section under Part 2 Section 4 Project Team.
Alex will have budget and delivery ownership and will act as a single point of
contact for Jones Lang LaSalle. We are challenging ourselves to a potential
minimum save of 5% on controllable costs with fee at risk for non-performance.
The role will additionally need to manage key strategic vendor relationships
focusing on quality of talent available on the account, quick escalation and
resolution of major issues, ownership of the savings commitment and roadmap and
any other regional programs that will need to be implemented from time to time.
In summary, we believe the proposed alternate model will ensure the following for
Morgan Stanley:
• Greater ownership which will result in deeper partnership with a provider like
Jones Lang LaSalle
• Greater regionalization which in effect will lead to consistency, quicker issue
resolution and ownership and delivery of programs at a regional level
• Commitment on savings from third party vendor contracts which will be
owned and managed by the Regional Account Director.
Fee
From our previous experience with Morgan Stanley in many countries, the model
has been a basic outsourcing model with Jones Lang LaSalle earning its
management fee as a mark up on the staff costs. While there is nothing wrong with
the model, we believe some refinement of the model will be beneficial for both
Morgan Stanley as well as Jones Lang LaSalle. The refinement could be in the risk
and reward mechanism such that
2
• If Jones Lang LaSalle beats the target KPIs, there should be potential upside
which can go up to 25% of the base management fee
• If Jones Lang LaSalle underperforms on the KPIs, JLL to forfeit 25% part of
the management fee
Technology
We have worked on the feedback received from Morgan Stanley in the past around
financial reporting capabilities of Maximo as well as financial reports in general.
We are making significant changes to our existing platform to address the existing
concerns. We have provided the details of all our technology systems in Part 3
General Requirement.
In summary, below is our proposed technology solution to Morgan Stanley under
the alternate proposal.
3
Appendix A –
Company Information
Appendix A -
Company Information
1. Please provide contact information for your company in respect of this Tender and any
subsequent communication.
Details Response
Company Name Jones Lang LaSalle Ltd
Company Address 28th Floor, One Pacific Place
88 Queensway, Hong Kong.
Company website http://www.joneslanglasalle.com/Pages/Home.aspx
Pre-existing Business
2. Please provide details of any pre-existing business with any member of the Morgan Stanley
group of companies by product, service and spend, and identify any cost savings or benefits
that may be associated with any consolidation or amalgamation of such contracts with the
services that are the subject of this Tender.
1
Business Line APAC EMEA Americas
Valuations & Advisory 69,628 224,495
Hotels 15,542 62,500
PDS 162,423 312,479
Leasing 90,393 48,091 3,101,457
Property, Asset Management - 76,041
Grand Total 769,095 348,626 3,748,658
Most of our revenues with Morgan Stanley are standalone transactions across the
globe. However, if we are awarded the full RFP scope, we will be happy to
discount our existing management fee by 5% across all countries. Our proposed fee
for the 3 countries is on the lower side of our existing benchmarks for similar
financial organizations. We are happy to receive feedback and further our
proposition.
Reciprocal Trading
3. Please provide details of any current or past (last 2 years) trading relationship (sales and
purchases) between your company and Morgan Stanley on either a group or individual
company basis.
Jones Lang LaSalle does not have any Reciprocal Business relationship with
Morgan Stanley in Asia Pacific.
Insurance
4. Please provide details of insurance policies held including copies of cover notes / policies
with your response. Details of the following should be provided as a minimum:
For Australia
Type of Insurance Level of Cover Provided (AUD)
Employers Liability USD 1 mil per occurrence and USD 2 mil in aggregate (per annum)
Public Liability USD 1 mil per occurrence and USD 2 mil in aggregate (per annum)
Product Liability USD I mil per occurrence and USD 2 mil in aggregate (per annum)
Coverage provided is for Product and operations Liability as the scope
requirements require us to provide services rather than products
For China
Type of Insurance Level of Cover Provided (RMB)
Employers Liability USD 1 mil per occurrence and USD 2 mil in aggregate (per annum)
2
Type of Insurance Level of Cover Provided (RMB)
Public Liability USD 1 mil per occurrence and USD 2 mil in aggregate (per annum)
Product Liability USD I mil per occurrence and USD 2 mil in aggregate (per annum)
Coverage provided is for Product and operations Liability as the scope
requirements require us to provide services rather than products
5. It is important to Morgan Stanley that we conduct business in a manner that safeguards our
employees, third parties and the public - as well as the environment.
Corporate Governance
We are proud of the rigor and quality of our firm’s corporate governance and the
benefits these policies produce for our stakeholders. We comply with the laws of
the world’s most stringent regulatory authorities. These include the New York
Stock Exchange, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Royal
Institute of Chartered Surveyors, and financial services authorities in the U.K.,
Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, and other countries.
Our Board of Directors has ultimate responsibility for the management of our
business. The Board elects our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Operating and Financial Officer, as well as other senior officers. The management
team, with the Board’s oversight, is responsible for conducting the Company’s
business to enhance our company’s long-term value. The Board performs many of
its functions through three Committees comprised of non-executive, independent
directors: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating
and Governance Committee. We publish key information about our corporate
governance guidelines on our public Web site.
3
The Audit Committee
The Audit Committee monitors the integrity of the Company’s financial
statements, the quality of its internal disclosure controls, its enterprise risk
management processes, compliance with the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley statute, the
performance of the Company’s internal audit function and its independent
registered public accounting firm and the Company’s compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements.
Jones Lang LaSalle Property Consultants Pty. Ltd. is a subsidiary of Jones Lang
LaSalle Incorporated, a company listed on the New York Stock Exchange and as
such is subject to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Full details of our
Corporate Governance protocols and initiatives including the governance structure
can be found on the following page of our corporate website - Board of Governors
& Corporate Governance. In addition Jones Lang LaSalle strictly enforces
4
compliance with its Code of Business Ethics a copy of which can be downloaded
from our website –
http://www.joneslanglasalle.com/InvestorPDFs/JLLCodeofEthics.pdf
Jones Lang LaSalle management and staff are fully dedicated to ensuring all
aspects of Health and Safety (H&S) management are addressed to the highest
standard for the benefit and welfare of our clients, employees, sub-contractors and
the public.
As a business, we are committed to:
Promoting a culture in which each Jones Lang LaSalle employee acts
proactively to improve the safety, health and well-being of their colleagues as
well as others that work or visit the properties where we operate
Targeting zero harm to people through our business activities
Meeting or exceeding occupational safety regulations and legal requirements
that relate to our operation and occupancy of properties
Complying with our clients’ safety policies and programs
Achieving continuous improvement to our safety, health and well-being
performance
Fostering a culture that encourages the reporting, analysis and elimination of
health and safety issues
To fulfill these commitments we have developed and implement health and safety
management systems and processes that enable us to:
• Set, achieve and report against objectives to demonstrate continual
performance improvement.
• Identify, assess and manage hazards, consequences and risks from our
activities
• Train and deploy competent people and allocate responsibilities and tasks
commensurate with their individual skills
• Review the safety implications of our activities.
• Learn and benefit from our experiences and the experiences of others.
5
We are committed to complying with and staying current with environmental,
safety and health regulations that are relevant to our industry. In addition, we are
dedicated to the safety of our employees, our client’s employees and the people
located in and visiting the properties and projects we manage.
6
Vendor inductions are also undertaken to communicate Jones Lang LaSalle and
Morgan Stanley H&S policies and procedures, house rules and what is required of
any contractors when working on your sites. Our vendor induction provides clarity
and understanding of general, work specific and site specific safety obligations
related to new and existing sites. For each new site, before the commencement of
facility management activities, or for non-operational sites upon their de-
commissioning, site risk assessments are undertaken to identify risk components
and to permit development and communication of ongoing risk control processes.
We have created a DVD-based Contractor Safety
Induction Programme that is mandatory viewing for all
contractors before site works begin. Similarly an
Employee Workplace Safety Induction DVD has been
created and is used as part of our own staff induction and
training process.
Our health and safety management process fully takes
into account our client environmental, health and safety
management policies and requirements. Therefore a fundamental element of our
programme is to ensure total understanding of any such requirements and their
integration into our organisational arrangements.
Responsibility for environmental, health and safety management cascades through
Jones Lang LaSalle from the Chief Executive through to each individual.
Responsibilities are allocated based on the principle that you are responsible for the
work under your control, for those working under your control and for the people
who could be affected by your work. It is therefore the responsibility of all
managers to ensure the health and safety of staff and others who may be affected
by those activities under their control.
In addition to the above, we have carried out the following activities to assist
Morgan Stanley in reinforcing the importance of H&S:
Provided regular updates to H&S Gap Analysis for all buildings
Participated in regular meetings to review Morgan Stanley’s Emergency
Procedures
Assisted in roll out of AED Programme for Region
Environment
Please give details of the policies your company has governing the Environment. If you have a
policy booklet, please provide this with your response.
7
implementation of those initiatives required to optimise our own sustainable
performance.
The Environmental Sustainability Board has been operating since this time and has
outlined our Environmental Policy, which is a high-level statement of our beliefs
about environmental sustainability and how we intend to act on these beliefs.
Subsequently endorsed by our Global Executive Committee and the Jones Lang
LaSalle Board of Directors, the policy is built around the following five goals:
Reduce the environmental impacts of our business operations
Deliver the best possible solutions to our clients
Drive thought leadership and innovation on industry issues
Train employees to deliver improvement internally and for our clients
Meet or exceed the requirements of environmental laws and regulations
A key initiative is the auditing of our carbon footprint – a measure of human
activities on the environment in terms of the volume of greenhouse gases
produced, measured in units of carbon dioxide – for our corporate offices and of
our staff travel across the globe. Equipped with this knowledge, we can work
together to neutralise our impact.
Our internal goal is to reduce our own carbon footprint while continuing to focus
on the bigger impact that we can have with our clients such that we consistently
achieve a total savings for our clients that exceeds ten times our internal footprint.
We have met this goal each of the last two years through the results that we have
delivered to our clients and through the actions that we have taken in our own
portfolio through our A Cleaner Tomorrow (ACT) programme described below.
Our ACT: A Cleaner Tomorrow programme focuses on energy conservation, water
conservation, emissions reduction, solid waste reduction, recycling and recycled
materials use with the following goals:
• Measure our carbon footprint and continue to reduce our impact
• Occupy sustainable certified space (LEED, BREEAM, Energy Star, etc.)
where possible
• Reduce the CO2 impact of corporate travel by investing in communication
and technology tools, and flexible work practices
• Engage and educate our people to create permanent sustainable behavioural
change
This programme is managed through assigned site champions in all of our office
locations who then drive implementation through a series of activities such as
recycling programmes, employee training and awareness, office equipment
surveys, kitchen waste management, reduction of disposable materials etc
8
As part of Morgan Stanley’s Environmental Programme, we have managed the
implementation of several initiatives in the region to assist the Asia offices in
achieving the firm’s global energy reduction targets. In HK alone, initiatives were
put in place realizing annual reductions of almost 1.3 million kWh with related
savings in excess of US$100,000 per year. We also participated in a waste audit in
Hong Kong which provided valuable data on current recyclable potential.
Meanwhile, the Facilities team are ensuring all cleaning and touch up works is
carried out with environmentally friendly products.
9
Appendix B – Terms
and Conditions Compliance
Appendix B -
Terms and Conditions
Compliance
Bidder is required confirm compliance to MS’ standard terms and conditions of contract and
provide details explanation for where you are not able to comply with.
1
Appendix C – Price Schedule
Appendix C -
Price Schedule
A. Australia, China and Hong Kong
b) Implementation Fee
Description Australia Amount (AUD) China Amount (RMB) Hong Kong Amount (HKD)
Implementation and Transition Fee 0 34,000 0
1
B. Australia and China
The fee shall be staff cost based. The preferred pricing model is a hybrid of “Cost Plus” and “Pass-through” with fee at risk and incentives as
described below:
Australia Fee China Fee
Contract Component Details (AUD p.a or %) (RMB p.a or %)
Contractor’s Staffing Cost According to the level of resources agreed for the 1,379,579 2,758,765
defined scope of services at the commencement of
the Services for the Buildings, this includes insurance
and any statutory requirements.
Management Fee A percentage of Contractor’s Staffing Cost. This shall 12% 20%
include Contractor’s Profit
Fee at Risk (Part 1) A percentage of Management Fee at risk subject to 15% 15%
satisfactory performance of the services (refer to
Service Level Agreement of the Agreement)
Fee at Risk (Part 2) A percentage of Management Fee at risk subject to 5% 5%
completion of agreed milestone for implementation of
regional best practices (milestones to be agreed and
reviewed in the management meetings)
Administration Fee for x% of the managed spend will be charged for acting 2.5% of the managed spend 5% of the managed spend
Principal Contract as principal contractor
Shared Saving Ratio Contractor’s share of savings recognized by cost 20% for a 1 year period only 20% for a 1 year period only
saving initiatives approved by Morgan Stanley after the savings have been after the savings have been
proven. proven.
b) Implementation Fee
Description Australia Amount (AUD) China Amount (RMB)
Implementation and Transition Fee 0 34,000
2
C. Australia and Hong Kong
The fee shall be staff cost based. The preferred pricing model is a hybrid of “Cost Plus” and “Pass-through” with fee at risk and incentives as
described below: -
Australia Fee Hong Kong Fee
Contract Component Details (AUD p.a or %) (HKD p.a or %)
Contractor’s Staffing Cost According to the level of resources agreed for the 1,370,909 11,729,464
defined scope of services at the commencement of
the Services for the Buildings, this includes insurance
and any statutory requirements.
Management Fee A percentage of Contractor’s Staffing Cost. This shall 12% 9%
include Contractor’s Profit
Fee at Risk (Part 1) A percentage of Management Fee at risk subject to 15% 15%
satisfactory performance of the services (refer to
Service Level Agreement of the Agreement)
Fee at Risk (Part 2) A percentage of Management Fee at risk subject to 5% 5%
completion of agreed milestone for implementation of
regional best practices (milestones to be agreed and
reviewed in the management meetings)
Administration Fee for x% of the managed spend will be charged for acting 2.5% of the managed spend 3% of the managed spend
Principal Contract as principal contractor
Shared Saving Ratio Contractor’s share of savings recognized by cost 20% of for a 1 year period 20% for a 1 year period only
saving initiatives approved by Morgan Stanley only after the savings have after the savings have been
been proven. proven.
b) Implementation Fee
Description Australia Amount (AUD) Hong Kong Amount (HKD)
Implementation and Transition Fee 0 0
3
D. China and Hong Kong
The fee shall be staff cost based. The preferred pricing model is a hybrid of “Cost Plus” and “Pass-through” with fee at risk and incentives as
described below: -
China Fee Hong Kong Fee
Contract Component Details (RMB p.a or %) (HKD p.a or %)
Contractor’s Staffing Cost According to the level of resources agreed for the 2,695,627 11,729,464
defined scope of services at the commencement of
the Services for the Buildings, this includes insurance
and any statutory requirements.
Management Fee A percentage of Contractor’s Staffing Cost. This shall 20% 9%
include Contractor’s Profit
Fee at Risk (Part 1) A percentage of Management Fee at risk subject to 15% 15%
satisfactory performance of the services (refer to
Service Level Agreement of the Agreement)
Fee at Risk (Part 2) A percentage of Management Fee at risk subject to 5% 5%
completion of agreed milestone for implementation of
regional best practices (milestones to be agreed and
reviewed in the management meetings)
Administration Fee for x% of the managed spend will be charged for acting 5% of the managed spend 3% of the managed spend
Principal Contract as principal contractor
Shared Saving Ratio Contractor’s share of savings recognized by cost 20% for a 1 year period only 20% for a 1 year period only
saving initiatives approved by Morgan Stanley after the savings have been after the savings have been
proven. proven.
b) Implementation Fee
Description China Amount (RMB) Hong Kong Amount (HKD)
Implementation and Transition Fee 34,000 0
4
E. Australia only
The fee shall be staff cost based. The preferred pricing model is a hybrid of “Cost
Plus” and “Pass-through” with fee at risk and incentives as described below: -
Australia Fee
Contract Component Details (AUD p.a or %)
Contractor’s Staffing Cost According to the level of resources agreed for the 1,379,579
defined scope of services at the commencement of
the Services for the Buildings, this includes insurance
and any statutory requirements.
Management Fee A percentage of Contractor’s Staffing Cost. This shall 12%
include Contractor’s Profit
Fee at Risk A percentage of Management Fee at risk subject to 15%
satisfactory performance of the services (refer to
Service Level Agreement of the Agreement)
Administration Fee for x% of the managed spend will be charged for acting 2.5% of the managed spend
Principal Contract as principal contractor
Shared Saving Ratio Contractor’s share of savings recognized by cost 20% for a 1 year period only
saving initiatives approved by Morgan Stanley after the savings have been
proven.
b) Implementation Fee
5
F. China only
The fee shall be staff cost based. The preferred pricing model is a hybrid of “Cost
Plus” and “Pass-through” with fee at risk and incentives as described below: -
China Fee
Contract Component Details (RMB p.a or %)
Contractor’s Staffing Cost According to the level of resources agreed for the 2,758,765
defined scope of services at the commencement of
the Services for the Buildings, this includes insurance
and any statutory requirements.
Administration Fee for x% of the managed spend will be charged for acting 5% of the managed spend
Principal Contract as principal contractor
Shared Saving Ratio Contractor’s share of savings recognized by cost 20% for a 1 year period only
saving initiatives approved by Morgan Stanley after the savings have been
proven.
b) Implementation Fee
6
G. Hong Kong only
The fee shall be staff cost based. The preferred pricing model is a hybrid of “Cost
Plus” and “Pass-through” with fee at risk and incentives as described below: -
Hong Kong Fee
Contract Component Details (HKD p.a or %)
Contractor’s Staffing Cost According to the level of resources agreed for the 11,300,270
defined scope of services at the commencement of
the Services for the Buildings, this includes insurance
and any statutory requirements.
Administration Fee for x% of the managed spend will be charged for acting 3% of the managed spend
Principal Contract as principal contractor
Shared Saving Ratio Contractor’s share of savings recognized by cost 20% for a 1 year period only
saving initiatives approved by Morgan Stanley after the savings have been
proven.
b) Implementation Fee
Description Hong Kong Amount (HKD)
Implementation and Transition Fee 0
H. Assumption Schedule
1. All costs proposed in our response include the applicable statutory provident
fund rates, e.g. CPF, Superannuation, etc. In the event that the local rates
change due to local regulation, the cost difference will be passed on to Morgan
Stanley.
2. All costs proposed in our response are before any local taxes, such as GST,
VAT, China Business Tax, etc.
3. Deployment of resources is based on the scope of work and service levels
specified in the RFP. For example in Australia,
a. The requirement for a Jones Lang LaSalle Office Administrator to be
accountable for the staff inductions, processing of Amex, Blackberry,
Vodafone and cab charges, demands at least one full time position has
7
not been covered in this RFP. Hence we have not included in the
proposed resourcing model.
b. The consolidation project for MSSB and The Bond personnel
relocating to additional floors being leased from Chifley has not been
taken into consideration in the deployment of manpower for the
proposed delivery team.
4. We have retained the incumbent teams in Australia and Hong Kong and have
provided the current salary as year 1 staff cost. The next staff salary review is
in Mar/Apr 2011 and we have assumed that we will be conducting the review
on a joint effort basis with Morgan Stanley.
5. All pricing presented in Part 2 section 5 and Part 3 have been converted to US
dollars using the following exchange rate.
a. Australia - 1.1111
b. China - 6.8
c. Hong Kong - 7.8
8
Attachment to Appendix C (Price Schedule) [Bidder Name: Jones Lang LaSalle]
1 TBA Senior Facilities Manager TBA 37.5 1.0 100,360 9,032 6,022 6,022 13,147 1,676 8,000 144,258.77 - Not Applicable - 8,360
2 TBA Facilities Manager TBA 37.5 1.0 75,400 6,786 4,524 4,524 9,877 1,259 8,000 110,370.58 - Not Applicable - 6,281
3 TBA Office Administrator TBA 37.5 1.0 55,000 4,950 3,300 3,300 7,205 919 8,000 82,673.50 - Not Applicable - 4,582
4 TBA Project Manager TBA 37.5 1.0 109,720 9,875 6,583 6,583 14,373 1,832 8,000 156,966.84 160 9,140
5 TBA 24/7 Critical Environment Officers TBA 39.0 7.0 62,400 5,616 3,744 3,744 10,218 1,042 8,000 663,348.56 - Not Applicable - 36,385
6 TBA Account Director TBA 3.8 0.1 150,000 13,500 9,000 9,000 2,505 8,000 19,200.50 - Not Applicable - 1,250
7 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Mel TBA 20.0 0.5 83,500 7,515 5,010 5,010 10,939 1,394 8,000 60,683.98 - Not Applicable - 3,478
8 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Bne TBA 8.0 0.2 83,500 7,515 5,010 5,010 10,939 1,394 8,000 24,273.59 - Not Applicable - 1,391
9 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Adl TBA 8.0 0.2 83,500 7,515 5,010 5,010 10,939 1,394 8,000 24,273.59 - Not Applicable - 1,391
10 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Per TBA 8.0 0.2 83,500 7,515 5,010 5,010 10,939 1,394 8,000 24,273.59 - Not Applicable - 1,391
1 TBA Senior Facilities Manager TBA 37.5 1.0 104,374 9,394 6,262 6,262 13,673 1,743 8,320 150,029.12 - Not Applicable - 8,694
2 TBA Facilities Manager TBA 37.5 1.0 78,416 7,057 4,705 4,705 10,272 1,310 8,320 114,785.40 - Not Applicable - 6,532
3 TBA Office Administrator TBA 37.5 1.0 57,200 5,148 3,432 3,432 7,493 955 8,320 85,980.44 - Not Applicable - 4,765
4 TBA Project Manager TBA 37.5 1.0 114,109 10,270 6,847 6,847 14,948 1,906 8,320 163,245.52 166 9,505
5 TBA 24/7 Critical Environment Officers TBA 39.0 7.0 64,896 5,841 3,894 3,894 10,627 1,084 8,320 689,882.50 - Not Applicable - 37,841
6 TBA Account Director TBA 3.8 0.1 156,000 14,040 9,360 9,360 0 2,605 8,320 19,968.52 - Not Applicable - 1,299
7 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Mel TBA 20.0 0.5 86,840 7,816 5,210 5,210 11,376 1,450 8,320 63,111.33 - Not Applicable - 3,617
8 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Bne TBA 8.0 0.2 86,840 7,816 5,210 5,210 11,376 1,450 8,320 25,244.53 - Not Applicable - 1,447
9 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Adl TBA 8.0 0.2 86,840 7,816 5,210 5,210 11,376 1,450 8,320 25,244.53 - Not Applicable - 1,447
10 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Per TBA 8.0 0.2 86,840 7,816 5,210 5,210 11,376 1,450 8,320 25,244.53 - Not Applicable - 1,447
1 TBA Senior Facilities Manager TBA 37.5 1.0 108,549 9,769 6,513 6,513 14,220 1,813 8,653 156,030.29 - Not Applicable - 9,042
2 TBA Facilities Manager TBA 37.5 1.0 81,553 7,340 4,893 4,893 10,683 1,362 8,653 119,376.82 - Not Applicable - 6,793
3 TBA Office Administrator TBA 37.5 1.0 59,488 5,354 3,569 3,569 7,793 993 8,653 89,419.66 - Not Applicable - 4,955
4 TBA Project Manager TBA 37.5 1.0 118,673 10,681 7,120 7,120 15,546 1,982 8,653 169,775.34 173 9,885
5 TBA 24/7 Critical Environment Officers TBA 39.0 7.0 67,492 6,074 4,050 4,050 11,052 1,127 8,653 717,477.80 - Not Applicable - 39,354
6 TBA Account Director TBA 3.8 0.1 162,240 14,602 9,734 9,734 0 2,709 8,653 20,767.26 - Not Applicable - 1,351
7 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Mel TBA 20.0 0.5 90,314 8,128 5,419 5,419 11,831 1,508 8,653 65,635.79 - Not Applicable - 3,762
8 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Bne TBA 8.0 0.2 90,314 8,128 5,419 5,419 11,831 1,508 8,653 26,254.31 - Not Applicable - 1,505
9 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Adl TBA 8.0 0.2 90,314 8,128 5,419 5,419 11,831 1,508 8,653 26,254.31 - Not Applicable - 1,505
10 TBA Facilities Manager (MS & MSSB) - Per TBA 8.0 0.2 90,314 8,128 5,419 5,419 11,831 1,508 8,653 26,254.31 - Not Applicable - 1,505
Helpdesk - Property Satellite Centre 8,670 1.0 8,670 A) Australia, China and Hong Kong 60,585
Helpdesk - MyFacility Satellite Helpdesk n.a. B) Australia and China 69,255
360Facility 1,120 1.0 1,120 C) Australia and Hong Kong 60,585
E) Australia only 69,255
TOTAL 69,255
1 TBA Facilities Manager BJ TBA 40.0 1 264,000 59,424 7,316 0 4,550 335,290.00 - Not Applicable - 44,000
2 TBA Assistant Facilities Manager BJ TBA 40.0 1 216,000 59,424 6,484 0 4,550 286,458.00 - Not Applicable - 36,000
3 TBA Facilities Officer BJ TBA 40.0 1 96,000 42,528 4,404 0 4,550 147,482.00 85 16,000
4 TBA Senior Technician BJ TBA 40.0 1 72,000 31,896 3,988 5,815 4,550 118,249.38 68 12,000
5 TBA Technician BJ TBA 40.0 3 42,000 18,612 3,468 3,392 4,550 216,066.92 41 21,000
6 TBA Assistant Facilities Manager SH TBA 40.0 1 216,000 55,788 6,484 0 4,418 282,690.05 - Not Applicable - 36,000
7 TBA Senior Facilities Officer ZH TBA 40.0 1 132,000 55,788 5,028 0 4,418 197,234.05 - Not Applicable - 22,000
8 TBA Facilities Officer SH TBA 40.0 2 96,000 42,240 4,404 0 4,418 294,124.09 85 32,000
9 TBA Senior Techcian SH TBA 40.0 2 72,000 31,680 3,988 0 4,418 224,172.09 65 24,000
10 TBA Technician SH TBA 40.0 2 42,000 18,492 3,468 3,392 4,418 143,540.71 41 14,000
11 TBA Receptionist ZH TBA 40.0 1 42,000 18,492 3,468 3,392 4,418 71,770.35 41 7,000
12 TBA Senior Techcian ZH TBA 40.0 1 72,000 31,680 3,988 5,815 4,418 117,901.43 68 12,000
17 2,434,979 276,000
Total iinvoiced amt exclude mgt fee 2,710,979
2) Facilities Management Services Cost - Year 2 (All costs shown are in RMB) 8%
Staffing Level Direct Benefit Indirect Benefit Overhead Hourly Rates
Item Staff Name Job Title Start Date Basic Hrs No. of Staff Annual Base Superannuation / Health Plan Pls specify (%) Annual /Sick Pls specify Admin OH Total Staff Standard Hourly Rate Year End Bonus (per
/ Week / Proposed Salary (12 month Provident Fund Leave (Backfill) (%) Cost Annum for total
Staff based) number of FTEs)
1 TBA Facilities Manager BJ TBA 40.0 1 285,120 64,178 7,901 0 4,914 362,113.20 - Not Applicable - 47,520
2 TBA Assistant Facilities Manager BJ TBA 40.0 1 233,280 64,178 7,003 0 4,914 309,374.64 - Not Applicable - 38,880
3 TBA Facilities Officer BJ TBA 40.0 1 103,680 45,930 4,756 0 4,914 159,280.56 92 17,280
4 TBA Senior Technician BJ TBA 40.0 1 77,760 34,448 4,307 6,281 4,914 127,709.34 73 12,960
5 TBA Technician BJ TBA 40.0 3 45,360 20,101 3,745 3,664 4,914 233,352.28 44 22,680
6 TBA Assistant Facilities Manager SH TBA 40.0 1 233,280 60,251 7,003 0 4,771 305,305.25 - Not Applicable - 38,880
7 TBA Senior Facilities Officer ZH TBA 40.0 1 142,560 60,251 5,430 0 4,771 213,012.77 - Not Applicable - 23,760
8 TBA Facilities Officer SH TBA 40.0 2 103,680 45,619 4,756 0 4,771 317,654.02 92 34,560
9 TBA Senior Techcian SH TBA 40.0 2 77,760 34,214 4,307 0 4,771 242,105.86 70 25,920
10 TBA Technician SH TBA 40.0 2 45,360 19,971 3,745 3,664 4,771 155,023.96 44 15,120
11 TBA Receptionist ZH TBA 40.0 1 45,360 19,971 3,745 3,664 4,771 77,511.98 44 7,560
12 TBA Senior Techcian ZH TBA 40.0 1 77,760 34,214 4,307 6,281 4,771 127,333.54 73 12,960
17 2,629,777 298,080
Total iinvoiced amt exclude mgt fee 2,927,857
3) Facilities Management Services Cost - Year 3 (All costs shown are in RMB)
Staffing Level Direct Benefit Indirect Benefit Overhead Hourly Rates
Item Staff Name Job Title Start Date Basic Hrs No. of Staff Annual Base Superannuation / Health Plan Pls specify (%) Annual /Sick Pls specify Admin OH Total Staff Standard Hourly Rate Year End Bonus (per
/ Week / Proposed Salary (12 month Provident Fund Leave (Backfill) (%) Cost Annum for total
Staff based) number of FTEs)
1 TBA Facilities Manager BJ TBA 40.0 1 307,930 69,312 8,533 0 5,307 391,082.26 - Not Applicable - 51,322
2 TBA Assistant Facilities Manager BJ TBA 40.0 1 251,942 69,312 7,563 0 5,307 334,124.61 - Not Applicable - 41,990
3 TBA Facilities Officer BJ TBA 40.0 1 111,974 49,605 5,137 0 5,307 172,023.00 99 18,662
4 TBA Senior Technician BJ TBA 40.0 1 83,981 37,203 4,652 6,783 5,307 137,926.08 79 13,997
5 TBA Technician BJ TBA 40.0 3 48,989 21,709 4,045 3,957 5,307 252,020.46 48 24,494
6 TBA Assistant Facilities Manager SH TBA 40.0 1 251,942 65,071 7,563 0 5,153 329,729.67 - Not Applicable - 41,990
7 TBA Senior Facilities Officer ZH TBA 40.0 1 153,965 65,071 5,865 0 5,153 230,053.79 - Not Applicable - 25,661
8 TBA Facilities Officer SH TBA 40.0 2 111,974 49,269 5,137 0 5,153 343,066.34 99 37,325
9 TBA Senior Techcian SH TBA 40.0 2 83,981 36,952 4,652 0 5,153 261,474.33 75 27,994
10 TBA Technician SH TBA 40.0 2 48,989 21,569 4,045 3,957 5,153 167,425.88 48 16,330
11 TBA Receptionist ZH TBA 40.0 1 48,989 21,569 4,045 3,957 5,153 83,712.94 48 8,165
12 TBA Senior Techcian ZH TBA 40.0 1 83,981 36,952 4,652 6,783 5,153 137,520.23 79 13,997
17 2,840,160 321,926
Helpdesk - Property Satellite Centre 63,138 1.0 63,138 A) Australia, China and Hong Kong 260,648
Helpdesk - MyFacility Satellite Helpdesk n.a. B) Australia and China 323,786
360Facility 9,733 1.0 9,733 D) China and Hong Kong 260,648
F) China only 323,786
TOTAL 323,786
Regional Team
1 Account Manager TBA 45.0 1 1,008,000 12,000 15,120 15,120 20,160 20,160 1,090,560.00 - Not Applicable - 94,500
2 Regional Engineer TBA 45.0 1 840,000 12,000 12,600 12,600 16,800 16,800 910,800.00 - Not Applicable - 74,900
3 Regional Admin & Finance Manager TBA 45.0 1 420,000 12,000 6,300 6,300 8,400 8,400 461,400.00 - Not Applicable - 37,450
4 Regional JDE Finance Officer TBA 45.0 1 300,000 12,000 4,500 4,500 6,000 6,000 333,000.00 - Not Applicable - 26,750
Hong Kong Team -
5 Chief Engineer on board 45.0 1 1,060,800 12,000 15,912 15,912 21,216 21,216 1,147,056.00 - Not Applicable - 94,588
6 Comms Manager on board 45.0 1 660,000 12,000 9,900 9,900 13,200 13,200 718,200.00 - Not Applicable - 58,850
7 Comms Engineer on board 45.0 1 447,600 12,000 6,714 6,714 8,952 8,952 490,932.00 - Not Applicable - 39,911
8 MAC Engineer on board 45.0 1 420,000 12,000 6,300 6,300 8,400 8,400 461,400.00 - Not Applicable - 37,450
9 General Office Engineer on board 45.0 1 423,600 12,000 6,354 6,354 8,472 8,472 465,252.00 - Not Applicable - 37,771
10 Landlord Engineer on board 45.0 1 374,400 12,000 5,616 5,616 7,488 7,488 412,608.00 - Not Applicable - 33,384
11 Technical Officer on board 54.0 2 218,400 11,830 3,276 3,276 4,368 4,368 491,036.00 293 38,948
12 Assistant Technical Officer on board 54.0 1 175,200 9,490 2,628 2,628 3,504 3,504 196,954.00 293 15,622
13 Senior Techincians on board 54.0 2 193,800 10,498 2,907 2,907 3,876 3,876 435,727.00 235 34,561
14 Technicians on board 54.0 10 163,560 8,860 2,453 2,453 3,271 3,271 1,838,687.00 235 145,841
15 Facilities Manager on board 45.0 1 744,000 12,000 11,160 11,160 14,880 14,880 808,080.00 - Not Applicable - 66,340
16 Asst. Facilities Manager (Admin) on board 45.0 1 360,000 12,000 5,400 5,400 7,200 7,200 397,200.00 - Not Applicable - 32,100
17 Asst. Facilities Manager (Facilities) on board 45.0 1 436,800 12,000 6,552 6,552 8,736 8,736 479,376.00 - Not Applicable - 38,948
18 Asst. Facilities Manager (Hsekeeping) on board 45.0 1 304,800 12,000 4,572 4,572 6,096 6,096 338,136.00 - Not Applicable - 27,178
19 Senior Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 276,000 12,000 4,140 4,140 5,520 5,520 307,320.00 293 24,610
20 Finance Officer on board 45.0 1 310,800 12,000 4,662 4,662 6,216 6,216 344,556.00 293 27,713
21 Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 163,200 8,840 2,448 2,448 3,264 3,264 183,464.00 293 14,552
22 Handymen on board 45.0 5 123,840 6,708 1,858 1,858 2,477 2,477 696,084.00 235 55,212
23 Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) (only if 2 or moreon
locations
board are awarded)
45.0 2 236,400 12,000 3,546 3,546 4,728 4,728 529,896.00 293 42,158
24 Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) on board 45.0 2 236,400 12,000 3,546 3,546 4,728 4,728 529,896.00 293 42,158
25 Helpdesk Officer (Part-Time) on board 45.0 2 78,000 4,225 1,170 1,170 1,560 1,560 175,370.00 80 13,910
43 14,242,990.00 1,155,405
Total iinvoiced amt exclude mgt fee 15,398,395
Contractor's
Combination Staff Cost Operating Exp Staffing Ccost
A) Australia, China and Hong Kong 14,242,990 362,154 14,605,144
C) Australia and Hong Kong 11,447,230 282,234 11,729,464
D) China and Hong Kong 11,447,230 282,234 11,729,464
G) Hong Kong only 10,917,334 382,936 11,300,270
2) Facilities Management Services Cost - Year 2 (All costs shown are in HKD) 4%
Staffing Level Direct Benefit Indirect Benefit Overhead Hourly Rates
Item Staff Name Job Title Start Date Basic Hrs No. of Staff Annual Base Superannuation / Health Plan Employee Annual /Sick Severance Admin OH Total Staff Cost Standard Hourly Rate Year End Bonus
/ Week / Proposed Salary (12 month Provident Fund Compensation Leave (Backfill) payment (8.33% of basic +
Staff based) Insurance MPF + LP charges)
Regional Team
1 Account Manager TBA 45.0 1 1,048,320 12,000 15,725 15,725 20,966 20,966 1,133,702.40 - Not Applicable - 93,475
2 Regional Engineer TBA 45.0 1 873,600 12,000 13,104 13,104 17,472 17,472 946,752.00 - Not Applicable - 77,896
3 Regional Admin & Finance Manager TBA 45.0 1 436,800 12,000 6,552 6,552 8,736 8,736 479,376.00 - Not Applicable - 38,948
4 Regional JDE Finance Officer TBA 45.0 1 312,000 12,000 4,680 4,680 6,240 6,240 345,840.00 - Not Applicable - 27,820
Hong Kong Team 0 -
5 Chief Engineer on board 45.0 1 1,103,232 12,000 16,548 16,548 22,065 22,065 1,192,458.24 - Not Applicable - 98,372
6 Comms Manager on board 45.0 1 686,400 12,000 10,296 10,296 13,728 13,728 746,448.00 - Not Applicable - 61,204
7 Comms Engineer on board 45.0 1 465,504 12,000 6,983 6,983 9,310 9,310 510,089.28 - Not Applicable - 41,507
8 MAC Engineer on board 45.0 1 436,800 12,000 6,552 6,552 8,736 8,736 479,376.00 - Not Applicable - 38,948
9 General Office Engineer on board 45.0 1 440,544 12,000 6,608 6,608 8,811 8,811 483,382.08 - Not Applicable - 39,282
10 Landlord Engineer on board 45.0 1 389,376 12,000 5,841 5,841 7,788 7,788 428,632.32 - Not Applicable - 34,719
11 Technical Officer on board 54.0 2 227,136 12,000 3,407 3,407 4,543 4,543 510,071.04 304 40,506
12 Assistant Technical Officer on board 54.0 1 182,208 9,870 2,733 2,733 3,644 3,644 204,832.16 304 16,247
13 Senior Techincians on board 54.0 2 201,552 10,917 3,023 3,023 4,031 4,031 453,156.08 244 35,943
14 Technicians on board 54.0 10 170,102 9,214 2,552 2,552 3,402 3,402 1,912,234.48 244 151,675
15 Facilities Manager on board 45.0 1 773,760 12,000 11,606 11,606 15,475 15,475 839,923.20 - Not Applicable - 68,994
16 Asst. Facilities Manager (Admin) on board 45.0 1 374,400 12,000 5,616 5,616 7,488 7,488 412,608.00 - Not Applicable - 33,384
17 Asst. Facilities Manager (Facilities) on board 45.0 1 454,272 12,000 6,814 6,814 9,085 9,085 498,071.04 - Not Applicable - 40,506
18 Asst. Facilities Manager (Hsekeeping) on board 45.0 1 316,992 12,000 4,755 4,755 6,340 6,340 351,181.44 - Not Applicable - 28,265
19 Senior Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 287,040 12,000 4,306 4,306 5,741 5,741 319,132.80 304 25,594
20 Finance Officer on board 45.0 1 323,232 12,000 4,848 4,848 6,465 6,465 357,858.24 304 28,822
21 Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 169,728 9,194 2,546 2,546 3,395 3,395 190,802.56 304 15,134
43 14,802,503.20 1,196,816
15,999,320
3) Facilities Management Services Cost - Year 3 (All costs shown are in HKD)
Staffing Level Direct Benefit Indirect Benefit Overhead Hourly Rates
Item Staff Name Job Title Start Date Basic Hrs No. of Staff Annual Base Superannuation / Health Plan Employee Annual /Sick Severance Admin OH Total Staff Cost Standard Hourly Rate Year End Bonus
/ Week / Proposed Salary (12 month Provident Fund Compensation Leave (Backfill) payment (8.33% of basic +
Staff based) Insurance MPF + LP charges)
Regional Team
1 Account Manager TBA 45.0 1 1,090,253 12,000 16,354 16,354 21,805 21,805 1,178,570.50 - Not Applicable - 97,214
2 Regional Engineer TBA 45.0 1 908,544 12,000 13,628 13,628 18,171 18,171 984,142.08 - Not Applicable - 81,012
3 Regional Admin & Finance Manager TBA 45.0 1 454,272 12,000 6,814 6,814 9,085 9,085 498,071.04 - Not Applicable - 40,506
4 Regional JDE Finance Officer TBA 45.0 1 324,480 12,000 4,867 4,867 6,490 6,490 359,193.60 - Not Applicable - 28,933
Hong Kong Team 0 -
5 Chief Engineer on board 45.0 1 1,147,361 12,000 17,210 17,210 22,947 22,947 1,239,676.57 - Not Applicable - 102,306
6 Comms Manager on board 45.0 1 713,856 12,000 10,708 10,708 14,277 14,277 775,825.92 - Not Applicable - 63,652
7 Comms Engineer on board 45.0 1 484,124 12,000 7,262 7,262 9,682 9,682 530,012.85 - Not Applicable - 43,168
8 MAC Engineer on board 45.0 1 454,272 12,000 6,814 6,814 9,085 9,085 498,071.04 - Not Applicable - 40,506
9 General Office Engineer on board 45.0 1 458,166 12,000 6,872 6,872 9,163 9,163 502,237.36 - Not Applicable - 40,853
10 Landlord Engineer on board 45.0 1 404,951 12,000 6,074 6,074 8,099 8,099 445,297.61 - Not Applicable - 36,108
11 Technical Officer on board 54.0 2 236,221 12,000 3,543 3,543 4,724 4,724 529,513.88 316 42,126
12 Assistant Technical Officer on board 54.0 1 189,496 10,264 2,842 2,842 3,790 3,790 213,025.45 316 16,897
13 Senior Techincians on board 54.0 2 209,614 11,354 3,144 3,144 4,192 4,192 471,282.32 254 37,381
14 Technicians on board 54.0 10 176,906 9,582 2,654 2,654 3,538 3,538 1,988,723.86 254 157,742
15 Facilities Manager on board 45.0 1 804,710 12,000 12,071 12,071 16,094 16,094 873,040.13 - Not Applicable - 71,753
16 Asst. Facilities Manager (Admin) on board 45.0 1 389,376 12,000 5,841 5,841 7,788 7,788 428,632.32 - Not Applicable - 34,719
17 Asst. Facilities Manager (Facilities) on board 45.0 1 472,443 12,000 7,087 7,087 9,449 9,449 517,513.88 - Not Applicable - 42,126
18 Asst. Facilities Manager (Hsekeeping) on board 45.0 1 329,672 12,000 4,945 4,945 6,593 6,593 364,748.70 - Not Applicable - 29,396
19 Senior Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 298,522 12,000 4,478 4,478 5,970 5,970 331,418.11 316 26,618
20 Finance Officer on board 45.0 1 336,161 12,000 5,042 5,042 6,723 6,723 371,692.57 316 29,974
21 Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 176,517 9,561 2,648 2,648 3,530 3,530 198,434.66 316 15,739
22 Handymen on board 45.0 5 133,945 7,255 2,009 2,009 2,679 2,679 752,884.45 254 59,717
23 Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) (only if 2 or moreon
locations
board are awarded)
45.0 2 255,690 12,000 3,835 3,835 5,114 5,114 571,177.11 316 45,598
24 Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) on board 45.0 2 255,690 12,000 3,835 3,835 5,114 5,114 571,177.11 316 45,598
25 Helpdesk Officer (Part-Time) on board 45.0 2 84,365 4,570 1,265 1,265 1,687 1,687 189,680.19 87 15,045
-
43 15,384,043.33 1,244,689
4) Operating Expense (pls specify) 16,628,732
Operating / Administrative & Other Unit Cost Quantity Annual Total
Helpdesk - Property Satellite Centre 182,696 1 182,696 A) Australia, China and Hong Kong 362,154
Helpdesk - MyFacility Satellite Helpdesk 40,997 2 81,994 C) Australia and Hong Kong 282,234
360Facility 34,640 1 34,640 D) China and Hong Kong 282,234
G) Hong Kong only 382,936
TOTAL 544,849
Regional Team
1 Account Manager TBA 45.0 1 1,336,734 12,000 13,367 13,367 26,735 26,735 1,428,938 - Not Applicable - 432,600
2 Regional Engineer TBA 45.0 1 840,000 12,000 8,400 8,400 16,800 16,800 902,400 - Not Applicable - 74,900
3 Regional Admin & Finance Manager TBA 45.0 1 420,000 12,000 4,200 4,200 8,400 8,400 457,200 - Not Applicable - 37,450
4 Regional JDE Finance Officer TBA 45.0 1 300,000 12,000 3,000 3,000 6,000 6,000 330,000 - Not Applicable - 26,750
Hong Kong Team
5 Chief Engineer on board 45.0 1 1,060,800 12,000 10,608 10,608 21,216 21,216 1,136,448 - Not Applicable - 94,588
6 Comms Manager on board 45.0 1 660,000 12,000 6,600 6,600 13,200 13,200 711,600 - Not Applicable - 58,850
7 Comms Engineer on board 45.0 1 447,600 12,000 4,476 4,476 8,952 8,952 486,456 - Not Applicable - 39,911
8 MAC Engineer on board 45.0 1 420,000 12,000 4,200 4,200 8,400 8,400 457,200 - Not Applicable - 37,450
9 General Office Engineer on board 45.0 1 423,600 12,000 4,236 4,236 8,472 8,472 461,016 - Not Applicable - 37,771
10 Landlord Engineer on board 45.0 1 374,400 12,000 3,744 3,744 7,488 7,488 408,864 - Not Applicable - 33,384
11 Technical Officer on board 54.0 2 218,400 11,830 2,184 2,184 4,368 4,368 486,668 293 38,948
12 Assistant Technical Officer on board 54.0 1 175,200 9,490 1,752 1,752 3,504 3,504 195,202 293 15,622
13 Senior Techincians on board 54.0 2 193,800 10,498 1,938 1,938 3,876 3,876 431,851 235 34,561
14 Technicians on board 54.0 10 163,560 8,860 1,636 1,636 3,271 3,271 1,822,331 235 145,841
15 Facilities Manager on board 45.0 1 744,000 12,000 7,440 7,440 14,880 14,880 800,640 - Not Applicable - 66,340
16 Asst. Facilities Manager (Admin) on board 45.0 1 360,000 12,000 3,600 3,600 7,200 7,200 393,600 - Not Applicable - 32,100
17 Asst. Facilities Manager (Facilities) on board 45.0 1 436,800 12,000 4,368 4,368 8,736 8,736 475,008 - Not Applicable - 38,948
18 Asst. Facilities Manager (Hsekeeping) on board 45.0 1 304,800 12,000 3,048 3,048 6,096 6,096 335,088 - Not Applicable - 27,178
19 Senior Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 276,000 12,000 2,760 2,760 5,520 5,520 304,560 293 24,610
20 Finance Officer on board 45.0 1 310,800 12,000 3,108 3,108 6,216 6,216 341,448 293 27,713
21 Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 163,200 8,840 1,632 1,632 3,264 3,264 181,832 293 14,552
22 Handymen on board 45.0 5 123,840 6,708 1,238 1,238 2,477 2,477 689,892 235 55,212
23 Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) (only if 2 or moreon
locations
board are awarded)
45.0 0 0 -
24 Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) on board 45.0 0 0 -
25 Helpdesk Officer (Part-Time) on board 45.0 0 0 -
37 13,238,242 1,395,279
Total iinvoiced amt exclude mgt fee 14,633,521
2) Facilities Management Services Cost - Year 2 (All costs shown are in HKD) 4%
Staffing Level Direct Benefit Indirect Benefit Overhead Hourly Rates
Item Staff Name Job Title Start Date Basic Hrs No. of Staff Annual Base Superannuation / Health Plan Employee Annual /Sick Severance Admin OH Total Staff Cost Standard Hourly Rate Year End Bonus
/ Week / Proposed Salary (12 month Provident Fund Compensation Leave (Backfill) payment (8.33% of basic +
Staff based) Insurance MPF + LP charges)
Regional Team
1 Account Manager TBA 45.0 1 1,390,203 12,000 13,902 13,902 27,804 27,804 1,485,616 - Not Applicable - 123,960
2 Regional Engineer TBA 45.0 1 873,600 12,000 8,736 8,736 17,472 17,472 938,016 - Not Applicable - 77,896
3 Regional Admin & Finance Manager TBA 45.0 1 436,800 12,000 4,368 4,368 8,736 8,736 475,008 - Not Applicable - 38,948
4 Regional JDE Finance Officer TBA 45.0 1 312,000 12,000 3,120 3,120 6,240 6,240 342,720 - Not Applicable - 27,820
Hong Kong Team 0 -
5 Chief Engineer on board 45.0 1 1,103,232 12,000 11,032 11,032 22,065 22,065 1,181,426 - Not Applicable - 98,372
6 Comms Manager on board 45.0 1 686,400 12,000 6,864 6,864 13,728 13,728 739,584 - Not Applicable - 61,204
7 Comms Engineer on board 45.0 1 465,504 12,000 4,655 4,655 9,310 9,310 505,434 - Not Applicable - 41,507
8 MAC Engineer on board 45.0 1 436,800 12,000 4,368 4,368 8,736 8,736 475,008 - Not Applicable - 38,948
9 General Office Engineer on board 45.0 1 440,544 12,000 4,405 4,405 8,811 8,811 478,977 - Not Applicable - 39,282
10 Landlord Engineer on board 45.0 1 389,376 12,000 3,894 3,894 7,788 7,788 424,739 - Not Applicable - 34,719
11 Technical Officer on board 54.0 2 227,136 12,000 2,271 2,271 4,543 4,543 505,528 304 40,506
12 Assistant Technical Officer on board 54.0 1 182,208 9,870 1,822 1,822 3,644 3,644 203,010 304 16,247
13 Senior Techincians on board 54.0 2 201,552 10,917 2,016 2,016 4,031 4,031 449,125 244 35,943
14 Technicians on board 54.0 10 170,102 9,214 1,701 1,701 3,402 3,402 1,895,224 244 151,675
15 Facilities Manager on board 45.0 1 773,760 12,000 7,738 7,738 15,475 15,475 832,186 - Not Applicable - 68,994
16 Asst. Facilities Manager (Admin) on board 45.0 1 374,400 12,000 3,744 3,744 7,488 7,488 408,864 - Not Applicable - 33,384
17 Asst. Facilities Manager (Facilities) on board 45.0 1 454,272 12,000 4,543 4,543 9,085 9,085 493,528 - Not Applicable - 40,506
18 Asst. Facilities Manager (Hsekeeping) on board 45.0 1 316,992 12,000 3,170 3,170 6,340 6,340 348,012 - Not Applicable - 28,265
19 Senior Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 287,040 12,000 2,870 2,870 5,741 5,741 316,262 304 25,594
20 Finance Officer on board 45.0 1 323,232 12,000 3,232 3,232 6,465 6,465 354,626 304 28,822
21 Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 169,728 9,194 1,697 1,697 3,395 3,395 189,105 304 15,134
22 Handymen on board 45.0 5 128,794 6,976 1,288 1,288 2,576 2,576 717,488 244 57,420
23 Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) (only if 2 or moreon
locations
board are awarded)
45.0 0
24 Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) on board 45.0 0
25 Helpdesk Officer (Part-Time) on board 45.0 0
-
37 13,759,485 1,125,146
3) Facilities Management Services Cost - Year 3 (All costs shown are in HKD)
Staffing Level Direct Benefit Indirect Benefit Overhead Hourly Rates
Item Staff Name Job Title Start Date Basic Hrs No. of Staff Annual Base Superannuation / Health Plan Employee Annual /Sick Severance Admin OH Total Staff Cost Standard Hourly Rate Year End Bonus
/ Week / Proposed Salary (12 month Provident Fund Compensation Leave (Backfill) payment (8.33% of basic +
Staff based) Insurance MPF + LP charges)
Regional Team
1 Account Manager TBA 45.0 1 1,445,811 12,000 14,458 14,458 28,916 28,916 1,544,560 - Not Applicable - 128,918
2 Regional Engineer TBA 45.0 1 908,544 12,000 9,085 9,085 18,171 18,171 975,057 - Not Applicable - 81,012
3 Regional Admin & Finance Manager TBA 45.0 1 454,272 12,000 4,543 4,543 9,085 9,085 493,528 - Not Applicable - 40,506
4 Regional JDE Finance Officer TBA 45.0 1 324,480 12,000 3,245 3,245 6,490 6,490 355,949 - Not Applicable - 28,933
Hong Kong Team 0 -
5 Chief Engineer on board 45.0 1 1,147,361 12,000 11,474 11,474 22,947 22,947 1,228,203 - Not Applicable - 102,306
6 Comms Manager on board 45.0 1 713,856 12,000 7,139 7,139 14,277 14,277 768,687 - Not Applicable - 63,652
7 Comms Engineer on board 45.0 1 484,124 12,000 4,841 4,841 9,682 9,682 525,172 - Not Applicable - 43,168
8 MAC Engineer on board 45.0 1 454,272 12,000 4,543 4,543 9,085 9,085 493,528 - Not Applicable - 40,506
9 General Office Engineer on board 45.0 1 458,166 12,000 4,582 4,582 9,163 9,163 497,656 - Not Applicable - 40,853
10 Landlord Engineer on board 45.0 1 404,951 12,000 4,050 4,050 8,099 8,099 441,248 - Not Applicable - 36,108
11 Technical Officer on board 54.0 2 236,221 12,000 2,362 2,362 4,724 4,724 524,789 316 42,126
12 Assistant Technical Officer on board 54.0 1 189,496 10,264 1,895 1,895 3,790 3,790 211,130 316 16,897
13 Senior Techincians on board 54.0 2 209,614 11,354 2,096 2,096 4,192 4,192 467,090 254 37,381
14 Technicians on board 54.0 10 176,906 9,582 1,769 1,769 3,538 3,538 1,971,033 254 157,742
15 Facilities Manager on board 45.0 1 804,710 12,000 8,047 8,047 16,094 16,094 864,993 - Not Applicable - 71,753
16 Asst. Facilities Manager (Admin) on board 45.0 1 389,376 12,000 3,894 3,894 7,788 7,788 424,739 - Not Applicable - 34,719
17 Asst. Facilities Manager (Facilities) on board 45.0 1 472,443 12,000 4,724 4,724 9,449 9,449 512,789 - Not Applicable - 42,126
18 Asst. Facilities Manager (Hsekeeping) on board 45.0 1 329,672 12,000 3,297 3,297 6,593 6,593 361,452 - Not Applicable - 29,396
19 Senior Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 298,522 12,000 2,985 2,985 5,970 5,970 328,433 316 26,618
20 Finance Officer on board 45.0 1 336,161 12,000 3,362 3,362 6,723 6,723 368,331 316 29,974
21 Facilities Officer on board 45.0 1 176,517 9,561 1,765 1,765 3,530 3,530 196,669 316 15,739
22 Handymen on board 45.0 5 133,945 7,255 1,339 1,339 2,679 2,679 746,187 254 59,717
23 Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) (only if 2 or moreon
locations
board are awarded)
45.0 0
24 Helpdesk Officer (Full-Time) on board 45.0 0
25 Helpdesk Officer (Part-Time) on board 45.0 0
-
37 14,301,225 1,170,152
4) Operating Expense (pls specify) 15,471,377
Operating / Administrative & Other Unit Cost Quantity Annual Total
TOTAL 495,616
Critical Environment Mgmt $3.5M 349,224 CEM cost will depend on the size of data center and client Cleaning A 327,500 A Cleaning cost will depend on MS cleaning requirements.
requirements
We provide e.g. number
energy annual
tracking shutdown,
on utility spendservice level etc.
but additional Benchmark cleaning
Pest Control cost cost across our
will depend existing
on MS accounts
cleaning is averaging
requirements.
$264K consultancy on LEED certification, energy saving project will A 2,540 A Benchmark cleaning cost across our existing accounts is averaging
Energy Mgmt need to be review on a case by case basis Pest Control 3.12 RMB/sqm/Annum
Diesel Generators O O O O O Tea Lady Services O 40,002 A This will depend on number of tea ladies required by MS
The indicative cost will be for HVAC system will be based on
model type, quantity, model etc. For a typical PPM on a chiller Cost for catering can range from RMB 8 per meal to RMB 25 per
A A on site it will be 1 day with a team of 4 doing oil/gas filter, gasket O O O A O meal. This will largely depend on MS catering requirements e.g.
change will be RMB 2080 with materials and labour included. number of dishes, drinks, fruits offered
HVAC (this exclude tax and sub contractor fee) Catering (Coordination)
The indicative cost for maintenance on Electrical system
Largely based on the the number of calls expected and if MS wants
depends on what electrical system it is. Call out rate range from
A A $841K O A a dedicated helpdesk service or leverage out centralise helpdesk
RMB 80 to RMB 150 depending on the level and experience of
service in Dalian
Electrical technician required Helpdesk Services
Call out rate range from RMB 80 to RMB 150 depending on the
Fire & Life Safety
A A level and experience of technician required Event Coordination / Meeting Room Mgmt
O O O Need further clarification on requirements
Call our rate for PPM service on UPS range from RMB 80 to
A A A A RMB 150. Typical maintenance on UPS will be one day work O O O O Need further clarification on requirements
UPS Maintenance with a team of two technicians. Office supplies (Pantry) & equipment
For mail room service if volumn is significant we can negotiation for
DHL/EMS to dedicate a parcel manager free of charge for MS. If
volumn is not significant additon fee will be required. If there
A A A A A O O O O
additional requriements, such as personal delivery of package
additional aiyi (cleaning staff) are required to dispatch mail &
Workplace Services
CCTV & Access Control Mailroom package to MS employee
Call out rate range from RMB 80 to RMB 150 depending on the
Hard Services
Key:
Principal
Agent
Out of Scope
Assumptions:
1
Date implemented
Initiative Description Results / $ Saves (in Local Currency) Value Creation (Where applicable) Location
(Month / Year)
Reconfiguring the support of Introduction of a new Australian Legislation increasing Q1 2010 AUD10,000 . A new roster was developed providing 24x7 coverage by Australia
24x7 technicians to manage rostered employees holidays from 4 weeks leave to 5 weeks 7 JLL technicians across 2 sites whilst offering support
critical environment effective on 1 January 2010: JLL took the opportunity to on after-hours vendor site access and performance
support and procatively launch an initiative to reduce the management.
requirement to employ security guards to cover out of hours . Provided more pro-active management for the
work. monitoring of site alarms, critical environment
maintenance, after hours project works, IT cabling and
patching management
. Improved risk management and provided a more
efficient, cost effective means of managing critical
environment.
. Improved the management of Permits to Work for all
areas.
. Developed a "Weekend Work Briefcase" to improve
handover of tasks and weekend project works for all
sites, ensuring all relevant documentation and
communications are stored in one easy to access
location.
Sourcing Strategy The objective was to put more services under contract as Jul-10 Too early to assess as tender process . Savings are anticipated on Data Cabling and Australia
traditionally 80% of the maintenance work was being not complete for all services. Handyman. Due to increased, more comprehensive
undertaken on ad hoc basis. The main drivers for the scope of works and the additional MSSB sites savings
strategy were cost, rolling in the Morgan Stanley Smith not anticipated for Electrical. Similarly for Fire Services.
Barney (MSSB) sites and risk minimization. Major contracts . Improved risk management
include Fire Services, Electrical, Data Cabling, Handyman
Energy Cost Optimization Visit and investigate the usage pattern of air-conditioning Jan-Sep 2010 $55K annually - siwtched off all copy room extract fans Hong Kong
systems for all functional area - switch off indesk cooling
- switch off pantry FCUs
- reduce the pump speed for half of L39 indesk cooling
system
Modification of Chiller System May-10 $240K annually Added interconnection pipework and switched off B Hong Kong
chillers
Reduce the lighting level in general office area in progress $55K annually Delamping in office areas Hong Kong
UPS rationalization Sep-10 $118K annually Hong Kong - DCB
Visit and investigate the condition of Data Centre and adjust Jun-Dec 2010 $334K annually - increase room temperature of comms room Hong Kong
the room temperature - increase chilled water termperature
-
Hong Kong
Operating Cost Optimization Pantry wooden floor polishing work Sep-10 $84K annually - having in house cleaning & handymen team to perform Hong Kong
the polishing work
Carpet Spot Clean Apr-10 $300K annually - getting overnight cleaner (free of charge) to provide Hong Kong
carpet spot cleaning
Continuous Improvement Work CIWG is a program that is run by FM management in each Q1 2010 Morgan Stanley JLL team have participated in CIWG Appreciating the value of the CIWG Australia
Groups (CIWG) country. The objective of the program is to encourage all along with other accounts. The Morgan Stanley team sessions, Morgan Stanley has agreed to
accounts to identify initiatives that will improve processes presented their solution for the "weekend briefcase" host the session scheduled for April 2011
and efficiencies or reduce costs. which was an improved handover of tasks and weekend
project works which also included ensuring the storage of
all relevant documentation and easy to access, central
communications. The team had the benefit of exposure to
the intiatives identified on other client accounts; they are
then able to consider whether these can be implememted
at Morgan Stanley.
New roster implemented for As well as producing costs savings the new roster meant Q2 2010 Utility shift enabled us to upskill these members of staff Provided approval to use a roster specialist Australia
24x7 team. that the team were rostered on to do a day shift (utility shift) so we are now able to use them to complete more tasks. to work through complicated requirements.
every 6 weeks. It also meant that security guards were not Reduction of reliance of security guards meant that we
required. use staff trained in risk management and other duties for
a more productive shift.
Weekend Works Briefcase and As all works in the critical environment are done after hours Q2 2010 Strengthens Critical Environment Management for Buy-in obtained from MS IT for new Australia
Permit to Work System it is important that the technicians managing contractors are Morgan Stanley and therefore risk management. This has procedures.
fully informed. The briefcase allows smooth communication also encompassed IT contractors that are managed by
between day and shift staff. The Permit to work system is the JLL Team (this process filled a gap that we had
JLL best practice in managing method statements and tasks recognised with this).
that are being performed onsite. No contractor is allowed
onsite without fillling in a permit to work form.
Marsh USA is the appointed insurance broker on behalf of Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. (“JLL”) with
respect to the IFM/PDS insurance program.
Marsh has placed the following insurance policy for JLL effective November 15, 2010.
The Foreign Commercial General Liability policy provides coverage for third party claims alleging
bodily injury and/or property damage arising from the insured’s operations. Coverage is written on
an “occurrence basis”. The “occurrence” form provides coverage for injury and damage that occurs
during the policy period. Automobile liability is provided for owned, hired and non-owned
automobile liability Excess/DIC of statutory coverage. Local liability policies are issued as part of
the AIU program where statutorily required. The insurer has the right and duty to defend any claim
that is reported under the policy. The coverage territory is anywhere in the world excluding The
United States of America (including its territories and possessions) and Canada and Puerto Rico and
those countries against which the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the
Treasury administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions. Primary Employers Liability is
included on the locally placed admitted general liability policy where required.
Foreign Voluntary Compensation/Employers Liability
• Policy Period: November 15, 2010 to November 15, 2011
• Policy Number: 83-55133
• Insurer: The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (AIG)
A.M. Best’s Rating: A p, XV
Standard & Poor’s Rating: A+
• Limits of Insurance
o Worker’s Compensation: Statutory Benefits
o Employer’s Liability: US$1,000,000 Bodily Injury by accident or disease;
each employee / policy limit
o Excess Repatriation Expenses: US$250,000 Per Person
The Foreign Worker’s Compensation policy provides coverage anywhere in the world, including
international waters or airspace, but excluding (a) the United States of America (including its
territories and possessions), (b) Puerto Rico, and (c) Canada and those countries against which the
Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury administers and enforces
economic and trade sanctions. No coverage is afforded under Coverage B-Employers’ Liability for
claims made, suits brought, judgments rendered or payments made in the following countries:
Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Turkey. Primary Employers Liability is
included on the locally placed admitted general liability policy where customary.
Umbrella Liability
• Policy Period: November 15, 2010 to November 15, 2011
• Policy Number: AUC 59944289-02
• Insurer: Steadfast Insurance Company (Zurich)
A.M. Best’s Rating: A g, XV
Standard & Poor’s Rating: AA-
• Limits of Insurance
o US$10,000,000 Each Occurrence
o US$10,000,000 Aggregate (per location)
The Umbrella is excess over the Foreign Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability
insurance. The coverage territory is the same as the primary coverage except this insurance will not
apply to loss, injury, damage, claim or suit arising directly or indirectly as a result of or in connection
with Terrorism that occurs in the following countries: Afghanistan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bosnia-
Herzegovina, Burma, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Congo, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba,
Haiti, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kenya, North Korea, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya,
Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Palestinian Authority, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Somali, Sudan,
Thailand, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Yemen or Zimbabwe.
Insurers
The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania is a Chartis Company. Chartis is the marketing
name for the worldwide property-casualty and general insurance operations of Chartis Inc. For
additional information, please visit the Chartis website at http://www.chartisinsurance.com. All
products are written by insurance company subsidiaries or affiliates of Chartis Inc. Chartis is the
world’s leading international insurance and financial services organization, with operations in more
than 130 countries and jurisdictions. Chartis’ common stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange, as well as the stock exchanges in London, Paris, Switzerland and Tokyo.
Sincerely,
Helen Kavanagh
_________________________________
Helen Kavanagh
Vice President
Marsh USA
Telephone: (617) 385-0218
Email: Helen.C.Kavanagh@marsh.com
Attachment E -
Annual Reports
1
COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE 2011
All information contained herein is from sources deemed reliable, however no
representation or warranty is made to the accuracy thereof.
www.joneslanglasalle.com